29.10.2014 Views

The Handbook of Discourse Analysis

The Handbook of Discourse Analysis

The Handbook of Discourse Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Discourse</strong> in Educational Settings 503<br />

25 <strong>Discourse</strong> in Educational<br />

Settings<br />

CAROLYN TEMPLE ADGER<br />

0 Introduction<br />

In an early study <strong>of</strong> language use in schools, Shuy and Griffin (1981) noted that<br />

whatever else goes on there, what they do in schools on any day is talk. To a great<br />

extent, the fabric <strong>of</strong> schooling is woven <strong>of</strong> linguistic interaction. One <strong>of</strong> the central<br />

concerns <strong>of</strong> discourse analysis in educational settings has been to uncover the ways<br />

in which talk at school is unique and thus what children must be able to do linguistically<br />

in order to succeed there. Attention focuses on the socialization functions that<br />

schools serve, especially but not exclusively those connected to teaching and learning.<br />

Another analytic perspective cross-cuts that one: discourse analysis is helping to<br />

explicate the actions in which the primary goal <strong>of</strong> schools – learning – is realized.<br />

This chapter <strong>of</strong>fers a selective overview <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the chief analytic constructs that<br />

have been employed in describing classroom interaction and some <strong>of</strong> the topics <strong>of</strong><br />

discourse study in educational settings. It closes by considering how insights from<br />

discourse analysis in schools can help to make them better.<br />

1 Focus on Linguistic Practices in Schools<br />

Since the early 1970s, research on language in schools has moved from a focus on<br />

discrete chunks <strong>of</strong> language to a concern with “communication as a whole, both to<br />

understand what is being conveyed and to understand the specific place <strong>of</strong> language<br />

within the process” (Hymes 1972: xxviii). Highly inferential coding <strong>of</strong> classroom<br />

linguistic activity receded (though it persists still) as scholars with disciplinary roots<br />

in anthropology, social psychology, sociology, and sociolinguistics began to focus on<br />

structural cues by which interactants understand what is going on (e.g. Gumperz and<br />

Herasimchuk 1975; McDermott et al. 1978; Mehan 1979). An early sociolinguistic<br />

study <strong>of</strong> instructional interaction in primary classrooms (Griffin and Shuy 1978) combining<br />

ethnographic, ethnomethodological, and pragmatic perspectives and research

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!