29.10.2014 Views

The Handbook of Discourse Analysis

The Handbook of Discourse Analysis

The Handbook of Discourse Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Language and Medicine 497<br />

socially or morally wrong.” For an<br />

opposing view, see Brandt (1988).<br />

30 Crookshank (1923: 343), in his quaint<br />

idiom, states: “In modern Medicine<br />

this tyranny <strong>of</strong> names is no less<br />

pernicious than is the modern form<br />

<strong>of</strong> scholastic realism [the view that<br />

diseases are “morbid entities” <strong>of</strong><br />

the phenomenal world]. Diagnosis,<br />

which, as Mr Bernard Shaw has<br />

somewhere declared, should mean<br />

the finding out <strong>of</strong> all there is wrong<br />

with a particular patient and why,<br />

too <strong>of</strong>ten means in practice that<br />

formal and unctuous pronunciation<br />

<strong>of</strong> a Name that is deemed appropriate<br />

and absolves from the necessity <strong>of</strong><br />

further investigation.”<br />

31 For a history <strong>of</strong> this epistemological<br />

dualism that subordinates subjective<br />

awareness (the patient’s) to direct<br />

observation (the physician’s), see<br />

Sullivan (1986).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Anspach, R. R. (1988). Notes on the<br />

sociology <strong>of</strong> medical discourse: the<br />

language <strong>of</strong> case presentation. Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Health and Social Behavior, 29,<br />

357–75.<br />

Beckman, H. B. and Frankel, R. M. (1984).<br />

<strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> physician behavior on<br />

the collection <strong>of</strong> data. Annals <strong>of</strong><br />

Internal Medicine, 101, 692–6.<br />

Benthall, J. and Polhemus, T. (eds). (1975).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Body as a Medium <strong>of</strong> Expression.<br />

London: Allen Lane.<br />

Bourhis, R., Roth, S., and MacQueen, G.<br />

(1989). Communication in the hospital<br />

setting: a survey <strong>of</strong> medical and<br />

everyday language use amongst<br />

patients, nurses, and doctors.<br />

Social Science and Medicine, 28(4),<br />

339–47.<br />

Boyd, J. W. (1996). Narrative aspects <strong>of</strong> a<br />

doctor–patient encounter. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Medical Humanities, 17(1), 5–15.<br />

Brandt, A. (1988). AIDS and metaphor:<br />

toward the social meaning <strong>of</strong><br />

epidemic disease. Social Research, 55,<br />

413–32.<br />

Brock, H. and Ratzan, R. (eds). (1988).<br />

Literature and Medicine, 7: special issue<br />

on “Literature and Bioethics.”<br />

Burnside, J. (1983). Medicine and war:<br />

a metaphor. Journal <strong>of</strong> the American<br />

Medical Association, 249, 2091.<br />

Burton, D. (1982). Through glass darkly:<br />

through dark glasses. In R. Carter<br />

(ed.), Language and Literature. An<br />

Introductory Reader in Stylistics<br />

(pp. 195–212). London: Allen and<br />

Unwin.<br />

Carter, A. H. (1989). Metaphors in the<br />

physician–patient relationship.<br />

Soundings, 72(1), 153–64.<br />

Carter, A. H. and McCullough, L. W.<br />

(eds). (1989). Soundings, 72(1), 7–164:<br />

Special section on “Metaphors,<br />

language, and medicine.”<br />

Cassell, E. (1976). Disease as an “it”:<br />

concepts <strong>of</strong> disease revealed by<br />

patients’ presentation <strong>of</strong> symptoms.<br />

Social Science and Medicine, 10,<br />

143–6.<br />

Cassell, E. J. (1985). Talking with Patients.<br />

Vol. 1: <strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Doctor–Patient<br />

Communication; Vol. 2: Clinical<br />

Technique. Cambridge, MA and<br />

London: MIT Press.<br />

Chambers, T. (1996a). Dax redacted:<br />

the economics <strong>of</strong> truth in bioethics.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Medicine and Philosophy, 23,<br />

287–302.<br />

Chambers, T. (1996b). From the ethicist’s<br />

point <strong>of</strong> view: the literary nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> ethical inquiry. Hastings Center<br />

Report, January–February,<br />

pp. 25–33.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!