The Handbook of Discourse Analysis
The Handbook of Discourse Analysis The Handbook of Discourse Analysis
22 Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen 1 M: It is complete; though it seems it isn’t. what do you reckon. C: Well I think I’ve got this one; 5 and I got it as you were reading it ou:t. → Is the answer ho:le. (0.6) → M: Is the answer ho:le. C: yes. 10 M: er: no. C: ↑oh! In auditory terms, judging register here involves (1) determining how high the caller’s turn Is the answer ho:le is in relation to her voice range, (2) determining how high the moderator’s repeat Is the answer ho:le is in relation to his voice range, and (3) comparing the two relatively. Register comparison across speakers is particularly difficult when the speakers have naturally different voice ranges, as here. However, the fact that the moderator comes off in line 8 as quoting what his caller has just said in line 6 suggests that his TCU is a good rendition of hers and consequently that the relative heights at which they are speaking are similar. Normalized measurements of fundamental frequency will back up this auditory judgment. Figure 1.1 shows a graph of fundamental frequency readings taken every one-tenth of a second for the two turns in question. 18 16 Semitones/Individual base 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 13.8 13.9 14 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 14.6 14.7 14.8 14.9 15.6 15.7 15.8 15.9 16 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 Seconds C1: is the answer hole M1: is the answer hole Figure 1.1
Intonation and Discourse 23 In order to normalize the readings and thus make different individual voices comparable, the Hertz values have been expressed here as semitones above the lowest pitch which each speaker is accustomed to use. Seen this way, it is quite obvious that the moderator is speaking at approximately the same height in his voice range as the caller is speaking in her voice range. Compare now a similar interactional situation where there is a noticeable shift of register in the moderator’s repetition of a caller’s prior turn: (3) Brain Teaser: Julie Salt 1 M: h you can find reference, in any Latin dictionary – to a brigade. C: .hh ↑troops! 5 (0.5) → M: {h}↑troops! erm → {h}↑troops! is wrong. 10 C: oh. hheh Here the fact that the moderator has shifted to an exceptionally high register on troops is obvious from comparing it to the prior you can find reference in any Latin dictionary to a brigade (lines 1–3) or to the following erm (line 7) and is wrong (line 9). The normalized f 0 curves obtained from acoustic analysis of these turns are shown in figure 1.2. 30 Semitones/Individual base 25 20 15 10 5 0 16.8 16.9 17 17.1 17.2 18 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 18.5 18.7 18.8 18.9 19 19.3 19.4 19.5 19.6 19.7 19.8 19.9 20 20.1 20.2 20.3 Seconds C4: troops M1: troops erm troops is wrong Figure 1.2
- Page 1: The Handbook of Discourse Analysis
- Page 4 and 5: Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics
- Page 6 and 7: Copyright © Blackwell Publishers L
- Page 9 and 10: Contents Contributors x Introductio
- Page 11 and 12: Contents ix B Culture, Community, a
- Page 13 and 14: Contributors xi non-truth condition
- Page 15 and 16: Contributors xiii Suzanne Fleischma
- Page 17 and 18: Contributors xv creation of gendere
- Page 19 and 20: Contributors xvii argumentation the
- Page 21 and 22: Contributors xix published several
- Page 23 and 24: Introduction 1 Introduction DEBORAH
- Page 25 and 26: Introduction 3 developed in Georget
- Page 27 and 28: Introduction 5 scholars at the time
- Page 29 and 30: Introduction 7 discourse analysis a
- Page 31 and 32: Introduction 9 discourse, and Cotte
- Page 33: Intonation and Discourse 11 I Disco
- Page 36 and 37: 14 Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen performa
- Page 38 and 39: 16 Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen contrast
- Page 40 and 41: 18 Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen of an in
- Page 42 and 43: 20 Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Focusing
- Page 46 and 47: 24 Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Figure 1
- Page 48 and 49: 26 Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen that spe
- Page 50 and 51: 28 Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen 5 hi!
- Page 52 and 53: 30 Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (see als
- Page 54 and 55: 32 Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Chafe, W
- Page 56 and 57: 34 Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen {h} High
- Page 58 and 59: 36 J. R. Martin and genre theory (H
- Page 60 and 61: 38 J. R. Martin Identification is c
- Page 62 and 63: 40 J. R. Martin As far as ideation
- Page 64 and 65: 42 J. R. Martin She also raises the
- Page 66 and 67: 44 J. R. Martin movers (before he,
- Page 68 and 69: 46 J. R. Martin Genre Genre// Field
- Page 70 and 71: 48 J. R. Martin NOTES 1 For related
- Page 72 and 73: 50 J. R. Martin Norwood, N.J.: Able
- Page 74 and 75: 52 J. R. Martin Kâte. Australian J
- Page 76 and 77: 54 Deborah Schiffrin 3 Discourse Ma
- Page 78 and 79: 56 Deborah Schiffrin simple and emp
- Page 80 and 81: 58 Deborah Schiffrin In (3), becaus
- Page 82 and 83: 60 Deborah Schiffrin 1.4 Comparison
- Page 84 and 85: 62 Deborah Schiffrin and semantical
- Page 86 and 87: 64 Deborah Schiffrin shows that tea
- Page 88 and 89: 66 Deborah Schiffrin parallel claus
- Page 90 and 91: 68 Deborah Schiffrin see E. Abraham
- Page 92 and 93: 70 Deborah Schiffrin Bolinger, D. 1
Intonation and <strong>Discourse</strong> 23<br />
In order to normalize the readings and thus make different individual voices comparable,<br />
the Hertz values have been expressed here as semitones above the lowest<br />
pitch which each speaker is accustomed to use. Seen this way, it is quite obvious that<br />
the moderator is speaking at approximately the same height in his voice range as the<br />
caller is speaking in her voice range.<br />
Compare now a similar interactional situation where there is a noticeable shift <strong>of</strong><br />
register in the moderator’s repetition <strong>of</strong> a caller’s prior turn:<br />
(3) Brain Teaser: Julie Salt<br />
1 M: h you can find reference,<br />
in any Latin dictionary –<br />
to a brigade.<br />
C: .hh ↑troops!<br />
5 (0.5)<br />
→ M: {h}↑troops!<br />
erm<br />
→<br />
{h}↑troops!<br />
is wrong.<br />
10 C: oh. hheh<br />
Here the fact that the moderator has shifted to an exceptionally high register on troops<br />
is obvious from comparing it to the prior you can find reference in any Latin dictionary to<br />
a brigade (lines 1–3) or to the following erm (line 7) and is wrong (line 9). <strong>The</strong> normalized<br />
f 0 curves obtained from acoustic analysis <strong>of</strong> these turns are shown in figure 1.2.<br />
30<br />
Semitones/Individual base<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
16.8<br />
16.9<br />
17<br />
17.1<br />
17.2<br />
18<br />
18.1<br />
18.2<br />
18.3<br />
18.4<br />
18.5<br />
18.7<br />
18.8<br />
18.9<br />
19<br />
19.3<br />
19.4<br />
19.5<br />
19.6<br />
19.7<br />
19.8<br />
19.9<br />
20<br />
20.1<br />
20.2<br />
20.3<br />
Seconds<br />
C4: troops M1: troops erm troops is wrong<br />
Figure 1.2