28.10.2014 Views

xavGE

xavGE

xavGE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Managing risk<br />

certain actions. Government agencies,<br />

such as the SEC, may also bring civil<br />

actions to force the defendant to give<br />

up illegally obtained profits or pay<br />

monetary penalties or to compel or<br />

stop certain actions.<br />

• Administrative—Government agencies<br />

bring administrative proceedings before<br />

administrative judges, who follow the<br />

rules promulgated by the applicable<br />

agency. For certain violations of the<br />

federal securities laws, the SEC may<br />

bring administrative proceedings to<br />

impose civil penalties or an order<br />

to bring immediate halt to allegedly<br />

improper conduct.<br />

• Criminal—Only the U.S. Department<br />

of Justice can institute federal criminal<br />

proceedings. Defendants who are<br />

convicted in criminal proceedings face<br />

substantial fines and, in the case of<br />

individuals, terms of imprisonment.<br />

None of these mechanisms is exclusive and<br />

a party may be forced to defend against<br />

more than one type of proceeding.<br />

Liability for corporate disclosures: The<br />

securities laws do not impose a general<br />

duty to disclose material information<br />

about the company. Rather, such disclosure<br />

is required only when there is a legal duty<br />

to do so. This duty arises in connection<br />

with the purchase and sale of securities,<br />

whether in registered or private offerings<br />

or in secondary market trading. The<br />

company and its directors and officers<br />

can be liable for material misstatements<br />

and omissions in public disclosures. This<br />

liability risk is mitigated by conducting<br />

appropriate due diligence prior to the IPO<br />

and establishing robust internal reporting<br />

and disclosure controls and procedures<br />

in connection with ongoing reporting<br />

obligations.<br />

Liability relating to insider trading:<br />

Insider trading liability arises under Rule<br />

10b-5 when a party trades the company’s<br />

securities (or “tips” others to do so) while<br />

aware of material nonpublic information.<br />

The number of insider trading enforcement<br />

actions by the SEC has increased steadily<br />

over the last five years, and it is expected<br />

that this aggressive enforcement trend will<br />

continue. To reduce the risk that trading<br />

by those parties in its securities may be<br />

claimed to violate the prohibition against<br />

insider trading, the company should<br />

observe the following guidelines:<br />

• Only trade during “window periods”<br />

tied to the release of the company’s<br />

interim and annual earnings reports<br />

and other material information and the<br />

public filing of such information with<br />

the SEC and the relevant securities<br />

exchange.<br />

• Develop and promote a written<br />

policy and code of ethics with clear<br />

guidelines prohibiting insider trading<br />

and addressing general standards of<br />

conduct, protection of confidential<br />

information and whistleblowing.<br />

• Develop robust compliance programs.<br />

• Conduct periodic training on<br />

contemporary regulations,<br />

requirements and developments for all<br />

employees, including directors, officers<br />

and other management.<br />

Meanwhile, directors, officers and<br />

employees should observe the following<br />

guidelines:<br />

• Do not trade when aware that a<br />

material event or trend is developing<br />

or will occur but is not yet ripe for<br />

disclosure.<br />

• Do not selectively disclose material<br />

nonpublic information to others.<br />

• Trade only in “window periods”<br />

in compliance with any internal<br />

procedures, after all important<br />

corporate developments have been<br />

disclosed to the market.<br />

• Trade pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan<br />

(see Section 6.3).<br />

Sarbanes-Oxley provisions: The<br />

Sarbanes-Oxley Act enhanced the SEC’s<br />

enforcement powers, expanded areas<br />

of personal exposure for directors and<br />

executive officers and created new criminal<br />

provisions. These provisions include:<br />

• giving the SEC the authority to freeze<br />

possible “extraordinary payments”<br />

to directors, officers, agents and<br />

employees during the course of an<br />

investigation involving “possible”<br />

violations of the federal securities laws;<br />

• mandating forfeiture of certain CEO<br />

and CFO bonuses and profits in<br />

connection with restatements;<br />

• giving the SEC the authority to seek<br />

equitable relief for the benefit of<br />

investors, which it has invoked to seek<br />

disgorgement of all compensation<br />

received after alleged occurrence of<br />

fraud, not just bonuses and incentive<br />

compensation;<br />

• giving the SEC the authority to bar<br />

persons from serving as directors or<br />

officers of public companies in cease<br />

and desist proceedings; and<br />

• creating civil and criminal penalties<br />

for false certifications by officers of<br />

periodic reports.<br />

Corporate compliance programs: A<br />

corporate compliance program is a written<br />

and operational commitment to companywide<br />

compliance with all applicable laws. A<br />

compliance program protects the company<br />

and management in three major ways:<br />

• It reduces the chance that employees<br />

will engage in criminal misconduct.<br />

• If employees do break the law, it can<br />

help mitigate the consequences for<br />

the company. The U.S. Department<br />

of Justice, the SEC and many other<br />

agencies are more lenient on companies<br />

with effective compliance programs<br />

when making charging decisions and<br />

assessing penalties.<br />

• It establishes behavioral and<br />

professional expectations for<br />

employees, allowing the company<br />

to set standards in advance and<br />

facilitating termination of employees<br />

for misconduct when rules are not<br />

followed.<br />

8.2 Class action and derivative lawsuits<br />

Marsh<br />

Imagine the shock if the newly public<br />

company were to be served with a federal<br />

securities class action lawsuit within three<br />

days following the IPO. This happened to a<br />

significant new issuer in 2012. In fact, most<br />

securities claims are filed within three<br />

years of an IPO and there is a significantly<br />

higher probability that a securities class<br />

action will arise if an IPO is involved. As<br />

such, when managing risk in a newly public<br />

company, it is critical to understand the<br />

primary civil liability exposures faced by<br />

directors and officers.<br />

Direct class actions: The primary exposure<br />

for directors and officers of U.S.-listed<br />

companies continues to come from federal<br />

NYSE IPO Guide<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!