28.10.2014 Views

xavGE

xavGE

xavGE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A public company and its shareholders<br />

requires listed companies to adopt a<br />

code of business conduct and ethics for<br />

directors, officers and employees that<br />

address conflicts of interest.<br />

• Auditors care—Auditors are obligated<br />

to have sufficient understanding of the<br />

company’s business activities to assess<br />

whether the company’s disclosures<br />

on related party transactions are<br />

adequate. Accounting requirements<br />

dictate certain disclosures about<br />

related party transactions. Audit rules<br />

set forth specific auditing procedures<br />

on how to determine the existence<br />

of related parties and transactions<br />

with them, how to examine identified<br />

related party transactions and<br />

how to respond to management’s<br />

representations that a transaction was<br />

consummated at arm’s length. These<br />

audit procedures are quite detailed and<br />

can involve a review of the company’s<br />

board minutes, proxy information<br />

and other material filed with the<br />

SEC, stockholder listings and other<br />

potential sources of information.<br />

How to deal with the issue: The company<br />

should develop policies and procedures<br />

for the review, approval or ratification of<br />

related party transactions. Clear policies<br />

are essential to provide directors and<br />

officers with guidance on related party<br />

transactions and how the company will<br />

deal with them. Although the securities<br />

laws do not mandate the specific features<br />

of the policy, they require disclosure of it<br />

in certain filings and suggest that it may be<br />

appropriate to include the following:<br />

• Types of transactions covered by the<br />

policies and procedures—The company<br />

should consider what makes most<br />

sense given its business requirements,<br />

corporate structure and operating<br />

style. Also, it pays to be aware of<br />

“hot-button” issues when describing<br />

the types of transactions covered.<br />

For example, the SEC is especially<br />

sensitive about transactions involving<br />

family members, so the company may<br />

consider developing a nepotism policy.<br />

• Standards to be applied pursuant to<br />

the policies and procedures—Policies<br />

should hold all related parties to<br />

the same standards as third parties.<br />

Although there may be situations<br />

where a limited market makes it<br />

difficult to establish what the terms<br />

and manner of settlement of a<br />

particular transaction would be with<br />

a third party, the company should<br />

nevertheless attempt to set forth<br />

objective business criteria against<br />

which the related party transaction can<br />

be reviewed.<br />

• The persons (or groups of persons on<br />

the board of directors or otherwise)<br />

who are responsible for applying such<br />

policies and procedures—The company<br />

should consider the board committee<br />

responsible for administering the<br />

policy. Usually the audit committee<br />

is charged with this task, but it may<br />

also make sense for the nominating<br />

and corporate governance committee<br />

to be responsible for matters relating<br />

to directors. Also, the company should<br />

establish when the responsible persons<br />

will review related party transactions.<br />

Although subsequent review may be<br />

acceptable, best practice mandates<br />

prior review.<br />

In order to enable board members<br />

or delegates to make informed advance<br />

decisions on related party transactions,<br />

company procedures need to ensure that<br />

the information presented to them is<br />

sufficient in scope and quality:<br />

• Sources of information—The first<br />

source of information should be the<br />

related parties themselves. For example,<br />

an annual questionnaire distributed to<br />

directors and officers should capture<br />

basic information about transactions<br />

between directors and officers, their<br />

family members and the company.<br />

Furthermore, directors and officers<br />

should have an ongoing obligation to<br />

inform the company in advance of any<br />

potential related party transaction<br />

and to provide updates of parties<br />

related to them, their employment<br />

and relationships with charitable<br />

organizations. The company may also<br />

consider instituting independent<br />

information-gathering procedures,<br />

which may include periodic review of<br />

news articles or Internet searches.<br />

• Application of information—The<br />

company may consider developing<br />

a related party master list to be<br />

distributed, with any updates, to the<br />

relevant members of management<br />

such as the CFO and business unit and<br />

department leaders responsible for<br />

purchasing or selling. The company<br />

may also develop a “watch list” of<br />

potentially related persons, using the<br />

sources of information described above<br />

to check whether their status changes.<br />

Tasks: In preparing for the IPO, the<br />

company and its lawyers should do the<br />

following:<br />

• Review both existing related party<br />

arrangements and any plans for new<br />

ones as soon as possible. Consider<br />

the impact of such arrangements on<br />

disclosure and governance standards.<br />

• Identify arrangements between officers,<br />

insiders and their close relatives on<br />

the one hand, and the company on<br />

the other; these arrangements will<br />

generally have to be disclosed.<br />

• Confirm that the compensation<br />

committee approves all elements<br />

of compensation paid to executive<br />

officers. Compensation exceeding<br />

$120,000 paid to executive officers<br />

must be disclosed if not approved (or<br />

recommended for approval) by the<br />

compensation committee or a group of<br />

independent directors performing that<br />

function.<br />

• Unwind loans to directors and officers<br />

before the initial IPO registration<br />

statement is filed with the SEC.<br />

• Develop written related party<br />

transaction policies and procedures.<br />

If the company already has a code of<br />

conduct or other policies addressing<br />

this issue, it may be preferable to<br />

integrate related party transactions<br />

policies with such existing policies.<br />

Although the securities laws do not<br />

require that policies and procedures<br />

be in writing, best practice mandates<br />

written policies.<br />

7.6 Share ownership mechanics<br />

Morrow & Co., LLC<br />

(a) Types of share ownership<br />

Shareholders can be divided into two<br />

broad groups: “registered” holders and<br />

“beneficial” holders. A registered holder<br />

NYSE IPO Guide<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!