xavGE
xavGE
xavGE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
IR and communications<br />
serve as a fundamental service for investor<br />
relations officers at a majority of U.S.-<br />
listed companies. The type of information<br />
and support provided by this program on a<br />
regular basis include:<br />
• day-of-trading feedback from active<br />
market participants that provides color<br />
and context on unusual volatility or<br />
trading volume;<br />
• updates on material institutional<br />
ownership changes as they are<br />
uncovered and a systematic update of<br />
institutional ownership on a monthly<br />
basis;<br />
• insights on the motivation behind<br />
institutional ownership changes<br />
and the strengths, weaknesses,<br />
opportunities and vulnerabilities of the<br />
structure of the shareholder base; and<br />
• access to resources—human, dataoriented<br />
and technical—that an<br />
investor relations officer can leverage to<br />
extend the capabilities of the investor<br />
relations team.<br />
Publicly traded companies in the<br />
United States are considered by the<br />
investment community to be among<br />
the most transparent in the world. The<br />
investor relations profession is well<br />
advanced and the quality of communication<br />
from companies to investors is second<br />
to none. The transparency provided to<br />
companies listed in the United States by<br />
the investment market, however, lacks<br />
timeliness and its opaqueness continually<br />
frustrates investor relations officers whose<br />
organizations are in continuous need of<br />
information regarding the trading and<br />
ownership of their equities.<br />
The two principal areas of frustration<br />
in terms of information flow for publicly<br />
traded companies are:<br />
1. the time lag in the disclosure of<br />
institutional ownership positions with<br />
the SEC; and<br />
2. the fragmentation of equity trading<br />
in the United States and the resulting<br />
inability to get a clear signal from the<br />
market to determine drivers of trading<br />
on a daily basis.<br />
Let’s first address the time lag<br />
in the reporting of institutional<br />
ownership. SEC Rule 13f-1 mandates<br />
that institutional investment managers<br />
with at least $100 million in equity<br />
assets disclose to the SEC their entire<br />
portfolios of equity securities and some<br />
equivalents on a quarterly basis. These<br />
filings, commonly referred to as 13Fs,<br />
are to state the investment managers’<br />
complete equity portfolios as of the end<br />
of each calendar quarter. However, the<br />
SEC allows investment managers 45<br />
days following the end of each quarter<br />
to submit the filing. For example, an<br />
investment manager’s Form 13F stating<br />
its holdings as of June 30, 2013, would<br />
not need to be submitted to the SEC<br />
prior to August 15, 2013.<br />
The second issue of fragmentation<br />
has been a steady topic of discussion at<br />
exchange operators, regulators, trading<br />
firms, institutional investors and publicly<br />
traded companies themselves. Equities<br />
in the United States now get traded on<br />
more than 50 venues, which include<br />
multiple exchanges, private alternative<br />
trading systems (commonly referred<br />
to as “dark pools”) and internally at<br />
specific broker-dealers. Additionally,<br />
the size of the average trade in a U.S.-<br />
listed equity has been in steady decline<br />
over the past 10 years and has moved<br />
from an average size of more than 1,000<br />
shares to less than 300 shares today.<br />
The fragmentation of the market overall<br />
and the fragmentation of the actual<br />
transactions have made understanding<br />
the drivers of day-to-day trading in<br />
equities challenging.<br />
The role of a company’s market<br />
intelligence and surveillance provider<br />
is to overcome the hurdles put in<br />
place by SEC regulations relating to<br />
institutional ownership and today’s<br />
equity market structure. To do this, the<br />
market intelligence and surveillance<br />
provider undertakes a thorough research<br />
process that starts with a complete<br />
understanding of the registration of<br />
ownership of a company’s security<br />
via the Depository Trust & Clearing<br />
Corporation (DTCC). The vast majority<br />
of investors, institutional and retail alike,<br />
hold equities in “street name” via banks<br />
and brokers that act as custodians of<br />
their assets. These custodians, in turn,<br />
have accounts at DTCC that allow for<br />
the electronic transfer of assets when<br />
equities are bought and sold. In the<br />
United States, the settlement of a trade,<br />
the time at which a buyer delivers cash<br />
to the seller and the seller delivers shares<br />
to the buyer, occurs three days following<br />
a trade, which is known as T13. This<br />
transfer of assets almost always occurs<br />
via DTCC. The issuer of the equity,<br />
the publicly listed company, has access<br />
to these DTCC records for a nominal<br />
annual fee. The market intelligence and<br />
surveillance provider, who will gain<br />
access to the DTCC settlement records<br />
with an issuer’s permission, utilizes<br />
DTCC settlement records as a roadmap<br />
for the research process to uncover<br />
the ultimate buyers and sellers of the<br />
company’s shares.<br />
U.S.-listed companies are also at a<br />
disadvantage in that there is no regulation<br />
mandating that custodians holding the<br />
company’s shares via DTCC disclose<br />
the identities of the investors behind<br />
their DTCC accounts. This means that<br />
the market intelligence and surveillance<br />
provider must utilize its expertise to<br />
understand the multitude of relationships<br />
between institutional investor portfolios<br />
and each DTCC nominee to get an initial<br />
understanding of who may be buying or<br />
selling shares. The inability to access<br />
information via custodians requires the<br />
market intelligence and surveillance<br />
provider to then engage in an outreach<br />
or survey process to the institutional<br />
community to gain information on the<br />
current holdings of their portfolios.<br />
Although institutions are not required<br />
to disclose this information, many are<br />
comfortable doing so to a credible and<br />
established market intelligence and<br />
surveillance provider who will also<br />
furnish a letter of authorization from the<br />
issuer stating its role in conducting this<br />
research.<br />
Identifying the buyers and sellers of<br />
a U.S.-listed equity is an ongoing and<br />
iterative process for any market intelligence<br />
and surveillance provider. Given the<br />
lack of mandated disclosure rules in<br />
the United States outside of Rule 13f-1,<br />
an issuer should not expect that every<br />
institutional position reported by a market<br />
intelligence and surveillance provider is<br />
an exact accounting. However, the issuer<br />
should expect high-quality information.<br />
Most issuers define accuracy of market<br />
58 NYSE IPO Guide