28.10.2014 Views

xavGE

xavGE

xavGE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IR and communications<br />

serve as a fundamental service for investor<br />

relations officers at a majority of U.S.-<br />

listed companies. The type of information<br />

and support provided by this program on a<br />

regular basis include:<br />

• day-of-trading feedback from active<br />

market participants that provides color<br />

and context on unusual volatility or<br />

trading volume;<br />

• updates on material institutional<br />

ownership changes as they are<br />

uncovered and a systematic update of<br />

institutional ownership on a monthly<br />

basis;<br />

• insights on the motivation behind<br />

institutional ownership changes<br />

and the strengths, weaknesses,<br />

opportunities and vulnerabilities of the<br />

structure of the shareholder base; and<br />

• access to resources—human, dataoriented<br />

and technical—that an<br />

investor relations officer can leverage to<br />

extend the capabilities of the investor<br />

relations team.<br />

Publicly traded companies in the<br />

United States are considered by the<br />

investment community to be among<br />

the most transparent in the world. The<br />

investor relations profession is well<br />

advanced and the quality of communication<br />

from companies to investors is second<br />

to none. The transparency provided to<br />

companies listed in the United States by<br />

the investment market, however, lacks<br />

timeliness and its opaqueness continually<br />

frustrates investor relations officers whose<br />

organizations are in continuous need of<br />

information regarding the trading and<br />

ownership of their equities.<br />

The two principal areas of frustration<br />

in terms of information flow for publicly<br />

traded companies are:<br />

1. the time lag in the disclosure of<br />

institutional ownership positions with<br />

the SEC; and<br />

2. the fragmentation of equity trading<br />

in the United States and the resulting<br />

inability to get a clear signal from the<br />

market to determine drivers of trading<br />

on a daily basis.<br />

Let’s first address the time lag<br />

in the reporting of institutional<br />

ownership. SEC Rule 13f-1 mandates<br />

that institutional investment managers<br />

with at least $100 million in equity<br />

assets disclose to the SEC their entire<br />

portfolios of equity securities and some<br />

equivalents on a quarterly basis. These<br />

filings, commonly referred to as 13Fs,<br />

are to state the investment managers’<br />

complete equity portfolios as of the end<br />

of each calendar quarter. However, the<br />

SEC allows investment managers 45<br />

days following the end of each quarter<br />

to submit the filing. For example, an<br />

investment manager’s Form 13F stating<br />

its holdings as of June 30, 2013, would<br />

not need to be submitted to the SEC<br />

prior to August 15, 2013.<br />

The second issue of fragmentation<br />

has been a steady topic of discussion at<br />

exchange operators, regulators, trading<br />

firms, institutional investors and publicly<br />

traded companies themselves. Equities<br />

in the United States now get traded on<br />

more than 50 venues, which include<br />

multiple exchanges, private alternative<br />

trading systems (commonly referred<br />

to as “dark pools”) and internally at<br />

specific broker-dealers. Additionally,<br />

the size of the average trade in a U.S.-<br />

listed equity has been in steady decline<br />

over the past 10 years and has moved<br />

from an average size of more than 1,000<br />

shares to less than 300 shares today.<br />

The fragmentation of the market overall<br />

and the fragmentation of the actual<br />

transactions have made understanding<br />

the drivers of day-to-day trading in<br />

equities challenging.<br />

The role of a company’s market<br />

intelligence and surveillance provider<br />

is to overcome the hurdles put in<br />

place by SEC regulations relating to<br />

institutional ownership and today’s<br />

equity market structure. To do this, the<br />

market intelligence and surveillance<br />

provider undertakes a thorough research<br />

process that starts with a complete<br />

understanding of the registration of<br />

ownership of a company’s security<br />

via the Depository Trust & Clearing<br />

Corporation (DTCC). The vast majority<br />

of investors, institutional and retail alike,<br />

hold equities in “street name” via banks<br />

and brokers that act as custodians of<br />

their assets. These custodians, in turn,<br />

have accounts at DTCC that allow for<br />

the electronic transfer of assets when<br />

equities are bought and sold. In the<br />

United States, the settlement of a trade,<br />

the time at which a buyer delivers cash<br />

to the seller and the seller delivers shares<br />

to the buyer, occurs three days following<br />

a trade, which is known as T13. This<br />

transfer of assets almost always occurs<br />

via DTCC. The issuer of the equity,<br />

the publicly listed company, has access<br />

to these DTCC records for a nominal<br />

annual fee. The market intelligence and<br />

surveillance provider, who will gain<br />

access to the DTCC settlement records<br />

with an issuer’s permission, utilizes<br />

DTCC settlement records as a roadmap<br />

for the research process to uncover<br />

the ultimate buyers and sellers of the<br />

company’s shares.<br />

U.S.-listed companies are also at a<br />

disadvantage in that there is no regulation<br />

mandating that custodians holding the<br />

company’s shares via DTCC disclose<br />

the identities of the investors behind<br />

their DTCC accounts. This means that<br />

the market intelligence and surveillance<br />

provider must utilize its expertise to<br />

understand the multitude of relationships<br />

between institutional investor portfolios<br />

and each DTCC nominee to get an initial<br />

understanding of who may be buying or<br />

selling shares. The inability to access<br />

information via custodians requires the<br />

market intelligence and surveillance<br />

provider to then engage in an outreach<br />

or survey process to the institutional<br />

community to gain information on the<br />

current holdings of their portfolios.<br />

Although institutions are not required<br />

to disclose this information, many are<br />

comfortable doing so to a credible and<br />

established market intelligence and<br />

surveillance provider who will also<br />

furnish a letter of authorization from the<br />

issuer stating its role in conducting this<br />

research.<br />

Identifying the buyers and sellers of<br />

a U.S.-listed equity is an ongoing and<br />

iterative process for any market intelligence<br />

and surveillance provider. Given the<br />

lack of mandated disclosure rules in<br />

the United States outside of Rule 13f-1,<br />

an issuer should not expect that every<br />

institutional position reported by a market<br />

intelligence and surveillance provider is<br />

an exact accounting. However, the issuer<br />

should expect high-quality information.<br />

Most issuers define accuracy of market<br />

58 NYSE IPO Guide

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!