28.10.2014 Views

xavGE

xavGE

xavGE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The IPO on-ramp under the JOBS Act<br />

(c) Scaled disclosures<br />

EGCs may “scale back” financial and<br />

compensation disclosures in their IPO<br />

registration statements and subsequent<br />

filings under the Exchange Act. In particular,<br />

IPO registration statements for EGCs may<br />

contain:<br />

• two years of audited financial<br />

statements, including those of acquired<br />

businesses, rather than the three-year<br />

requirement described in Section 2.2(a);<br />

• selected financial information for the<br />

years including and after the earliest<br />

audited period presented (i.e., as little<br />

as two years of selected financial<br />

information), rather than the five-year<br />

requirement described in Section 2.2(a);<br />

• MD&A for the periods covered by the<br />

audited financial statements (i.e., as<br />

little as two years plus “stub” periods),<br />

rather than the periods described in<br />

Section 3.3(a); and<br />

• the streamlined and simplified<br />

compensation disclosures required of<br />

smaller reporting companies, meaning<br />

that that the registration statement<br />

need not include, among other things, a<br />

detailed compensation discussion and<br />

analysis section or tabular information<br />

for more than three executive officers and<br />

certain executive compensation tables.<br />

With respect to the scaled executive<br />

compensation disclosure requirements,<br />

EGCs must still consider whether there<br />

is additional, material compensation<br />

disclosure that would be useful to<br />

investors to understand how the EGC’s<br />

executive compensation programs operate.<br />

EGCs may follow all or some of these<br />

“scaled” disclosure provisions, except in<br />

their initial filing or submission they must<br />

decide whether to take advantage of the<br />

extended transition period for complying<br />

with any of the FASB’s updates to its<br />

Accounting Standards Codification. If an<br />

EGC decides to take advantage of such an<br />

extended transition period, it may later<br />

choose to reverse its election. Although<br />

the JOBS Act refers to domestic company<br />

rules and forms, a foreign private issuer<br />

that qualifies as an EGC may comply with<br />

the scaled disclosure provisions to the<br />

extent relevant to the form requirements<br />

for foreign private issuers.<br />

While these changes are designed to<br />

reduce costs, EGCs may find that providing<br />

the traditional level of historical financial<br />

disclosure is helpful in the IPO marketing<br />

process. In the first year subsequent to the<br />

enactment of the JOBS Act, most EGCs<br />

have still presented financial statements<br />

for a full three years and also five years of<br />

selected financial data.<br />

(d) Test-the-waters communications<br />

As discussed in Section 3.2(b), issuers<br />

must avoid illegal offers and not engage in<br />

communications and activities that might<br />

be viewed as impermissibly affecting the<br />

market for the securities to be offered. The<br />

JOBS Act amends Section 5 of the Securities<br />

Act to add a new Section 5(d), which<br />

permits EGCs to engage in oral and written<br />

communications with institutional or highly<br />

sophisticated prospective investors to gauge<br />

their interest in a contemplated securities<br />

offering before or during the “quiet period”<br />

or during the “waiting period” described in<br />

Section 3.2(a). These communications are<br />

not a substitute for the traditional roadshow<br />

and book-building processes described in<br />

Section 3.4(b) and (c). While practices in<br />

this area are evolving, issuers should pay<br />

careful attention to the timing, content and<br />

delivery mechanism of each communication.<br />

In particular, written communications are<br />

subject to SEC review and could complicate<br />

the IPO process if they are inconsistent with<br />

the prospectus or roadshow presentation.<br />

The SEC has been requesting copies of any<br />

“testing-the-waters” communications made<br />

in reliance on Section 5(d) as well as any<br />

research reports.<br />

(e) Other benefits<br />

The “IPO on-ramp” provisions make<br />

becoming a public company more attractive<br />

by reducing costs and burdens for EGCs<br />

after they go public, often by simplifying<br />

and streamlining disclosures. One of the<br />

most significant of these benefits is an<br />

exemption from the requirement contained<br />

in Section 404(b) of SOX to obtain an<br />

internal controls attestation and report from<br />

a registered independent public accounting<br />

firm while the issuer remains an EGC. For<br />

many, perhaps most, companies seeking to<br />

complete an IPO, this will delay by at least<br />

three years the need to comply with this<br />

requirement of SOX. It should be noted,<br />

however, that, as explained in Chapter 2,<br />

EGCs will still be required to establish and<br />

maintain disclosure controls and procedures<br />

and internal controls, and their principal<br />

executive officer and principal financial<br />

officer will still be required to certify Form<br />

10-Q and 10-K filings.<br />

4.3 Process timeline<br />

Fenwick & West LLP<br />

The time-intensive process of submitting<br />

confidentially and executing an IPO as<br />

an EGC can take the 12 to 16 weeks from<br />

initial filing to effectiveness it typically<br />

takes for a non-EGC issuer to complete<br />

the process described in Section 3.1.<br />

As with IPOs of non-EGC issuers, the<br />

exact time taken to complete an IPO for<br />

an EGC can vary widely and depends on<br />

market conditions, the complexity of the<br />

transaction, the EGC’s readiness prior to<br />

embarking on the IPO process and many<br />

other factors. Like the process outlined in<br />

Section 3.1, the IPO process for EGCs can<br />

be broken down into the following stages.<br />

(a) Prior to official IPO process launch<br />

Decision to go public: While the EGC<br />

should still evaluate its internal readiness,<br />

including industry position and growth<br />

prospects, it also has the flexibility to<br />

assess investor interest in a contemplated<br />

offering of its securities, to determine<br />

whether it is ready to go public.<br />

Testing the waters: The EGC and its<br />

advisors should consider whether to<br />

engage in test-the-waters communications<br />

with “qualified institutional buyers” or<br />

“accredited investors” to gauge interest in a<br />

contemplated offering of its securities.<br />

Internal controls: Once the decision has<br />

been made to prepare for an IPO, the<br />

EGC should still take the actions other<br />

issuers take: select an appropriate board of<br />

directors, prepare audited financials (with<br />

a qualified independent registered public<br />

accounting firm), and begin establishing<br />

internal controls.<br />

Selection of advisors: The EGC should still<br />

carefully select its IPO advisors, including<br />

NYSE IPO Guide<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!