28.10.2014 Views

xavGE

xavGE

xavGE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Foreign private issuers<br />

a controlling shareholder) as a<br />

nonvoting observer, if that person is<br />

not the chair of the audit committee<br />

or an executive officer of the issuer<br />

and does not receive any compensation<br />

prohibited by the independence<br />

requirements; and<br />

• a representative of a foreign<br />

government that is an affiliate of the<br />

issuer, if that representative is not<br />

an executive officer of the issuer and<br />

does not receive any compensation<br />

prohibited by the independence<br />

requirements.<br />

A foreign private issuer is exempt from<br />

the audit committee requirements if it has<br />

an alternative mechanism for overseeing<br />

the independent auditor, such as a board<br />

of auditors or statutory auditors, that<br />

is separate from the issuer’s board of<br />

directors.<br />

There are also accommodations for<br />

foreign private issuers operating under a<br />

dual holding company structure and for<br />

foreign private issuers with two-tier board<br />

structures. If an issuer relies on any of<br />

the exemptions for foreign private issuers<br />

under the audit committee rules, it must<br />

disclose that in its annual report on<br />

Form 20-F.<br />

(c) Compensation committee<br />

A foreign private issuer is exempt from the<br />

requirements concerning compensation<br />

committees that apply to U.S. issuers, but<br />

if it relies on the exemption with respect<br />

to member independence, it must in its<br />

annual report on Form 20-F, if listed on<br />

the NYSE, include a description of any<br />

significant differences of home country<br />

rule from the NYSE rules regarding the<br />

composition of compensation committees.<br />

(d) Ethics code<br />

A foreign private issuer must disclose in its<br />

annual report on Form 20-F whether it has<br />

adopted a code of ethics that applies to its<br />

CEO, CFO, principal accounting officer or<br />

controller and persons performing similar<br />

functions. If the issuer has not adopted<br />

a code of ethics governing its CEO and<br />

senior financial officers, it must disclose<br />

that fact. A “code of ethics” means written<br />

standards that are reasonably designed to<br />

deter wrongdoing and to promote (1) honest<br />

and ethical conduct; (2) full, fair, accurate,<br />

timely and understandable disclosure in<br />

documents filed with the SEC and in other<br />

public communications; (3) compliance<br />

with applicable laws, rules and regulations;<br />

(4) the prompt internal reporting of<br />

violations of the code to an appropriate<br />

person or persons; and (5) accountability for<br />

adherence to the code. The code of ethics (if<br />

one exists) must be filed with the SEC and<br />

posted on the issuer’s website or otherwise<br />

made available to any person requesting a<br />

copy without charge. The issuer must also<br />

disclose, on an annual basis, any waiver<br />

(including any implicit waiver) granted<br />

to its CEO or any of the senior financial<br />

officers subject to the code and any<br />

amendments that may be made to the code.<br />

(e) Prohibitions on arranging credit<br />

A foreign private issuer planning a U.S. IPO<br />

should review any arrangements that may be<br />

considered direct or indirect loans or other<br />

extensions of credit by it or its subsidiaries<br />

to any of its executive officers or directors,<br />

as these generally must be terminated prior<br />

to the effectiveness of the IPO registration<br />

statement to comply with SOX.<br />

(f) Clawback requirements<br />

The Dodd-Frank Act requires the SEC to<br />

establish final rules under which the stock<br />

exchanges will amend their listing standards<br />

to require listed companies to adopt and<br />

disclose compensation clawback policies as<br />

set forth in the statute and implementing<br />

regulations. The SEC has yet to issue final<br />

rules, however, and it remains to be seen<br />

whether it will establish an exemption for<br />

foreign private issuers from the clawback<br />

policy requirement as it has for other<br />

corporate governance requirements. For<br />

further information concerning clawback<br />

requirements, see Section 2.4.<br />

(g) Foreign Corrupt Practices Act<br />

As described in more detail in Section<br />

6.1(c), a foreign private issuer that conducts<br />

an IPO in the United States will be subject<br />

to the FCPA. Two sets of provisions under<br />

the FCPA are applicable to SEC-reporting<br />

companies. One set, the accounting<br />

provisions, requires issuers to keep accurate<br />

books and records and to maintain a system<br />

of internal accounting controls. These<br />

accounting provisions are in addition<br />

to the internal control requirements<br />

and disclosure controls and procedures<br />

described in Section 9.6(b). The other set,<br />

the antibribery provisions, prohibits the<br />

bribery of non-U.S. government officials.<br />

An issuer will violate the antibribery<br />

provisions if it uses the mails or any means<br />

or instrumentality of interstate commerce<br />

(including communication between the<br />

United States and any foreign country)<br />

to, for example, make payments to foreign<br />

officials for the purpose of corruptly<br />

influencing actions or decisions by them<br />

in order to assist the issuer in obtaining<br />

business. The SEC and the U.S. Department<br />

of Justice have aggressively expanded FCPA<br />

enforcement in recent years.<br />

9.8 Managing risk<br />

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP<br />

Once a foreign private issuer is listed on<br />

a U.S. stock exchange, it and its directors,<br />

officers and certain other employees are<br />

subject to the federal and state securities<br />

laws with respect to their registration<br />

statements, reports filed with the SEC,<br />

other public statements and trading<br />

activities, as discussed in Section 8.1. For<br />

example, Rule 10b-5 broadly prohibits<br />

fraudulent and deceptive practices and<br />

untrue statements or omissions, both<br />

written and oral, of material fact in<br />

connection with the purchase and sale of<br />

any security. Under Rule 10b-5, the issuer<br />

and its employees or agents may be liable<br />

for making false or misleading statements<br />

about the issuer, whether or not any<br />

of them actually purchased or sold any<br />

securities. Liability requires proof that the<br />

defendant engaged in willful misconduct or<br />

at least acted recklessly and can be based<br />

on information contained in a document<br />

filed with the SEC (including a registration<br />

statement, the Form 20-F or a Form 6-K),<br />

as well as other information released to<br />

the public by the issuer, including press<br />

releases.<br />

The geographic reach of liability<br />

under Rule 10b-5 has been the subject of<br />

extensive litigation and some legislative<br />

changes in recent years. A private plaintiff<br />

can only sue under Rule 10b-5 with respect<br />

to securities transactions that occur in the<br />

United States or transactions in securities<br />

that are listed on a securities exchange in<br />

the United States. The SEC and other U.S.<br />

government agencies, however, can enforce<br />

Rule 10b-5 against wrongful conduct even<br />

NYSE IPO Guide<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!