Untitled - International Commission of Jurists
Untitled - International Commission of Jurists
Untitled - International Commission of Jurists
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
appear before the <strong>Commission</strong> was also dismissed on the basis that the whereabouts<br />
<strong>of</strong> such persons could not be traced and that this fact should not anyway prevent the<br />
confessions being admitted. 233<br />
While evidentiary rules in Sri Lanka’s commissions <strong>of</strong> inquiry are relaxed for the<br />
purposes <strong>of</strong> fact-finding (rather than determining criminal culpability), the admittance<br />
<strong>of</strong> confessions without further corroboration <strong>of</strong> their nature or right <strong>of</strong> reply,<br />
threatened to bring into disrepute the inquiry and judicial system as a whole. 234<br />
Moreover, the possibility <strong>of</strong> such ‘confessions’ being induced or coerced by law<br />
enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficers or through external influence is high.<br />
Given the reputation that the late Justice Sansoni had enjoyed, not merely by virtue <strong>of</strong><br />
holding the post <strong>of</strong> Chief Justice, but rather by the high calibre <strong>of</strong> his discharge <strong>of</strong> his<br />
judicial functions, these apparent departures from otherwise high standards guiding<br />
<strong>Commission</strong> proceedings raise questions that are partly addressed in the following<br />
comment.<br />
In judging Sansoni’s Report, we must go beyond the individual and take into<br />
consideration the milieu in which he was working. In a context where the<br />
politics <strong>of</strong> the nation is wayward and the executive both too powerful and<br />
thoroughly unscrupulous, to expect a good commission report on a matter<br />
involving high stakes, is to expect too much from individuals. 235<br />
These observations remain relevant in relation to the appointment and functioning <strong>of</strong><br />
commissions <strong>of</strong> inquiry in the present day context in Sri Lanka as well.<br />
2.2. Inquiry into attack on MSF Vehicle (Palampiddi-Iranai Road Inquiry)<br />
Date <strong>of</strong> Appointment: 9 May, 1991 236<br />
Date <strong>of</strong> Report: June, 1991 237<br />
Mandate: to inquire into the shooting and attack by aircraft which caused<br />
injury and damage to personnel and property <strong>of</strong> Medecins Sans Frontieres<br />
(MSF) on 3 May, 1991 and to ascertain whether the firing upon <strong>of</strong> the MSF<br />
vehicle by a government helicopter was intentional or accidental.<br />
The <strong>Commission</strong> found that the MSF <strong>of</strong>ficers had not obtained the requisite<br />
permission regarding route clearance from the Joint Operations Command (JOC) to<br />
233 ibid. To quote verbatim: ‘Nobody, not even the attorneys at law who raised this objection,<br />
considered it fit or necessary to move for notices on the makers. I made it clear that if they wished to<br />
appear before the <strong>Commission</strong>, I would be willing to hear them; and I have no doubt that the publicity<br />
given to the proceedings <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Commission</strong> would have brought that intimation <strong>of</strong> my decision, to hear<br />
them if they appeared, to the notice <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the makers who were desirous <strong>of</strong> appearing.” Those<br />
whose confessions were so admitted included P. Sathyaseelan (arrested as a suspect in terrorist<br />
activities who later escaped) and the son <strong>of</strong> TULF frontliner, the late A. Amirthalingam.<br />
234 See Annex ‘A’ to this report: Principle 9,<br />
235 Hoole, Rajan, op. cit, at p. 37.<br />
236 Appointed by President R. Premadasa. L.H de Alwis functioned as the one-man <strong>Commission</strong>er. This<br />
is commonly referred to as the MSF <strong>Commission</strong> report.<br />
237 Sessional Paper No. 11, 1991.<br />
71