Untitled - International Commission of Jurists
Untitled - International Commission of Jurists
Untitled - International Commission of Jurists
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
accused even though the relevant documents in this respect were expeditiously sent by<br />
the court to the Attorney General. Indictment was served on the accused only on 3<br />
June, 2002 on 120 charges including murder, attempted murder and unlawful<br />
assembly. Trial commenced in the High Court <strong>of</strong> Trincomalee. 186 The matter remains<br />
pending. 187<br />
4.3.2. The Thambalagamam Case<br />
In another alleged reprisal killing, several police and home guards killed eight Tamil<br />
civilians on 1 February, 1998 to avenge the LTTE bombing a week earlier <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Temple <strong>of</strong> the Tooth, a sacred place <strong>of</strong> worship for Buddhists. The alleged<br />
perpetrators had acquired a reputation in the area for abducting and killing people and<br />
reporting such killings as that <strong>of</strong> LTTE cadres to qualify for promotions. 188 Fifteen<br />
suspects were arrested but released on bail thereafter. This trial too is pending. 189<br />
4.3.3. The Mylanthanai Case<br />
This is one rare case <strong>of</strong> investigations into a reprisal killing resulting in a full-length<br />
prosecution, which however culminated in the acquittal <strong>of</strong> all the accused. On 9<br />
August, 1992, 18 Sinhalese soldiers attached to the Poonani army camp in Batticoloa<br />
were charged with the killing <strong>of</strong> 35 unarmed Tamil civilians in the village <strong>of</strong><br />
Mylanthani. The killings were believed to be in retaliation for the assassination <strong>of</strong><br />
senior army <strong>of</strong>ficer Denzil Kobbekaduwa at Arali Point in Jaffna.<br />
On 25 November, 2002, ten years after the incident, the accused soldiers were<br />
acquitted following a jury trial. General patterns prevalent in such cases were present<br />
here as well. The case was transferred from the Batticoloa High Court, near where the<br />
incident occurred and the witnesses lived, to the High Court in Polonnaruwa in the<br />
largely majority-dominated North-Central Province. This was on the request <strong>of</strong> the<br />
counsel for the accused, who contended that conducting the trial in Batticoloa would<br />
jeopardize the security <strong>of</strong> the accused. Though this motion was heeded, the security <strong>of</strong><br />
the witnesses was ignored. They were compelled to travel to Polonnaruwa, passing<br />
security barriers, a cause <strong>of</strong> great fear. 190 Even worse, the matter was later transferred<br />
yet again to the Colombo High Court. This trip was impossible for many witnesses,<br />
who were already displaced.<br />
The implications <strong>of</strong> the acquittal in the Mylanthanai Case is analysed in detail<br />
immediately below. The analysis is important as it illustrates the role that jury trials<br />
play in such prosecutions and highlights the Attorney General’s refusal to appeal<br />
against the acquittal despite requests by lawyers appearing for the victims.<br />
4.4. The Chemmani Case<br />
186 Interviews with lawyers associated with the case, 10.06.2008.<br />
187 ibid. One significant reason for the delay was the fact that all material evidence including weapons<br />
allegedly used in the massacre, were apparently destroyed in a fire that had occurred at the Government<br />
Analyst’s Office in Colombo in 2005.<br />
188 Interview with attorneys-at-law monitoring the case, 09.06.2009.<br />
189 ibid.<br />
190 Centre for Human Rights and Development, ‘CHRD in 2002; CHRD provides legal assistance to<br />
those without help,’ Sentinel Special Issue, Colombo, 2002, at p. 9.<br />
61