- Page 4 and 5: 3
- Page 6 and 7: ABBREVIATIONS AC AG AHRC AI A-L ALR
- Page 8 and 9: TAB TELO TUF TULF TYL UN UNHRC UNP
- Page 10 and 11: government agencies may be unable o
- Page 12 and 13: appointed under the Commissions of
- Page 14 and 15: communities. Krishanthi Kumaraswamy
- Page 16 and 17: investigative function that could m
- Page 18 and 19: measures recommended in regard to r
- Page 20 and 21: and Bandaranaike became the prime m
- Page 22 and 23: assembly and association of trade u
- Page 24 and 25: majority pro-Sinhala political lead
- Page 26 and 27: The violence reached a crescendo in
- Page 28 and 29: enforced disappearances were report
- Page 30 and 31: The Court of Appeal dismissed petit
- Page 32 and 33: process and commissions of inquiry
- Page 34 and 35: Declaration on Upholding Human Righ
- Page 36 and 37: terms, 66 and clear guidelines laid
- Page 38 and 39: Though the drafters of second Repub
- Page 40 and 41: • Perera v. AG 89 and Wickremeban
- Page 42 and 43: was also spared the distinction of
- Page 44 and 45: The Court’s reasoning at times ap
- Page 46 and 47: however, linked the habeas corpus a
- Page 48 and 49: The ineffectiveness of the writ rem
- Page 50 and 51: The Court of Appeal when sending th
- Page 52 and 53:
anything. We have received informat
- Page 54 and 55:
the findings of guilt against the a
- Page 56 and 57:
The Embilipitiya case is unique in
- Page 58 and 59:
police did not carry out the arrest
- Page 60 and 61:
sexual intercourse […].” 177 He
- Page 62 and 63:
accused even though the relevant do
- Page 64 and 65:
confession made to the military pol
- Page 66 and 67:
Chapter Three - Commissions of Inqu
- Page 68 and 69:
excesses that had preceded the acti
- Page 70 and 71:
property of Sinhalese persons domic
- Page 72 and 73:
appear before the Commission was al
- Page 74 and 75:
Notwithstanding these consideration
- Page 76 and 77:
The Commission’s recommendation t
- Page 78 and 79:
Date of Publication of Report: not
- Page 80 and 81:
(f) the measures necessary to preve
- Page 82 and 83:
were SLFPers. I was told, that area
- Page 84 and 85:
The 1994 Western, Southern and Saba
- Page 86 and 87:
focused on allowing within its purv
- Page 88 and 89:
3.1.3. Reflections on the Procedure
- Page 90 and 91:
However, the weak process of re-ref
- Page 92 and 93:
ouster) clause ruling out judicial
- Page 94 and 95:
(g) The relief if any that should b
- Page 96 and 97:
Interdiction from service of allege
- Page 98 and 99:
The Batalanda Commission recommende
- Page 100 and 101:
3.3.3. The Bindunuwewa Commission D
- Page 102 and 103:
ecommendation to this effect by the
- Page 104 and 105:
As of 31 December 2000, according t
- Page 106 and 107:
much affected by the awareness that
- Page 108 and 109:
Chapter Four - Evaluating Sri Lanka
- Page 110 and 111:
pattern of harms, to recommend meas
- Page 112 and 113:
justified and spelled out in the ma
- Page 114 and 115:
against any particular soldier or s
- Page 116 and 117:
analysis, these pillars of the judi
- Page 118 and 119:
competence. Their findings must be
- Page 120 and 121:
Regardless of the amendment however
- Page 122 and 123:
It was recorded by at least some of
- Page 124 and 125:
6.4. Affording alleged perpetrators
- Page 126 and 127:
Chapter Five - Sri Lanka’s Crimin
- Page 128 and 129:
to the attention of the Court in an
- Page 130 and 131:
2.1. First Information Reports In a
- Page 132 and 133:
arrests. In consequence, most of th
- Page 134 and 135:
Lengthy delays in filing indictment
- Page 136 and 137:
officers who were prepared not only
- Page 138 and 139:
prosecutor’s office would be to i
- Page 140 and 141:
y the byzantine and unfair burdens
- Page 142 and 143:
[…] while those in authority hold
- Page 144 and 145:
5.2. Language Issues at Trial Stage
- Page 146 and 147:
enforced disappearance; (ii) Exerci
- Page 148 and 149:
as to why specific reform of the cr
- Page 150 and 151:
6.3. Absence of a Specific Crime of
- Page 152 and 153:
camp. Scrutiny of the evidence in t
- Page 154 and 155:
any direct or indirect physical or
- Page 156 and 157:
have been adjourned by the relevant
- Page 158 and 159:
fact, acknowledged. 563 The accused
- Page 160 and 161:
The Human Rights Committee affirmed
- Page 162 and 163:
Thavaneethan v. Dissanayake [2003]
- Page 164 and 165:
Dias v. Abeywardene [1966] 68 NLR 4
- Page 166 and 167:
Vadivel Sathasivam and Parathesi Sa
- Page 168 and 169:
Criminal Courts Commission, Session
- Page 170 and 171:
Keenan, Alan, ‘Making Sense of Bi
- Page 172 and 173:
Principles on the Effective Prevent
- Page 174 and 175:
United Nations Human Rights Committ
- Page 176:
Pinto-Jayawardena, Kishali, ‘Furt