28.10.2014 Views

PWS100 Present Weather Sensor - Campbell Scientific

PWS100 Present Weather Sensor - Campbell Scientific

PWS100 Present Weather Sensor - Campbell Scientific

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 8. Functional Description<br />

8.6 Algorithm Description<br />

8.6.1 Detecting and Classifying Precipitation<br />

The <strong>PWS100</strong> has a structured detection volume consisting of four sheets of<br />

light each 0.4 mm in depth with 0.4 mm spacing. The area of detection is<br />

approximately 40 cm 2 as defined by the overlap of the two detectors each of<br />

which is 20° off of the light sheet propagation axis.<br />

Detection of precipitation is carried out in real-time. Time and frequency<br />

domain analysis of the signals from the two sensor heads is carried out to<br />

ensure all particles are detected. Time domain analysis allows quick stripping<br />

of larger particles while the frequency domain analysis picks out smaller<br />

particles using a slightly more computationally intensive routine.<br />

Using a series of thresholds and checks precipitation signals from particles as<br />

small as 0.1 mm diameter passing through the area of detection are identified<br />

while any sources of noise or particles not passing through the defined area are<br />

discounted. A routine then strips the signal from the incoming data for each<br />

real particle passing through the defined area in order to minimize the data that<br />

is to be further processed.<br />

When a particle passes through the four light sheets it provides a signal<br />

characteristic of the particle type and provides information on the velocity of<br />

the particle, by means of auto correlation, and size, by means of cross<br />

correlation of the two channels of data. Particles for which cross correlation<br />

could be poor (e.g., snow) may have their size measured by the analysis of<br />

particle transit time or signal amplitude (in the same way that present weather<br />

sensors without structured detection volumes measure particle size). Due to the<br />

Gaussian nature of the light sheet intensity there is more error involved in these<br />

transit time or signal amplitude measurements than those using the cross<br />

correlation which is independent of the signal intensity.<br />

The structure of the particle is to some degree given by the analysis of the<br />

signal peak to signal pedestal ratio. The signal pedestal is found through<br />

stripping higher frequencies from the particle signal (i.e., those produced by the<br />

four light sheets) and is higher for particles with higher crystallinity and<br />

therefore more scattering sites. Particles of water have almost no pedestal<br />

compared to the peak signal value whereas snow can have large pedestals<br />

compared to the peak signal value.<br />

Analysis of separate snow and rain/drizzle events has shown that there is very<br />

little overlap in the signal peak to pedestal peak ratio for the solid and liquid<br />

particles, though drizzle values extend further towards the snow values and<br />

snow grains extend further towards the liquid precipitation values, while the<br />

larger rain and snowflakes remain almost entirely separate. This is shown<br />

graphically in Figure 8-6 which represents two separate events one comprising<br />

snowflakes and snow grains (particle count on the left vertical axis) and one<br />

representing a mixed drizzle and rain event (particle count on the right vertical<br />

axis). This particular differentiator, only obtainable because the <strong>PWS100</strong> has a<br />

structured detection volume, is extremely useful in the fuzzy logic processing<br />

as described below and further in Section 8.6.4.1.<br />

8-6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!