28.10.2014 Views

Presentatie - vzw farmaka asbl

Presentatie - vzw farmaka asbl

Presentatie - vzw farmaka asbl

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Stents<br />

30.Brophy. Evidence for use of coronary stents. A hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:777-86<br />

Design N/n Population Sd Interventions Outcomes Results<br />

MA N=29,<br />

n=9918<br />

-Stable or<br />

unstable angina<br />

-6 to 16<br />

months<br />

-PTCA with stent<br />

-PTCA without stent<br />

Mortality -1.2% (zonder stent) vs 0.8%<br />

-OR= 0.69 (95%CI 0.43 to 1.05)<br />

Mortality OR MI -ARD= - 0.50% in favour of stent<br />

-OR= 0.90 (95%CI 0.72 to 1.11)<br />

CABG OR= 1.01 (95%CI 0.79 to 1.31)<br />

Angiographic<br />

restenosis<br />

-40% (zonder stent) vs 27%<br />

(ongecorrigeerde cijfers)<br />

-ARD= 14.5% in favour of stent<br />

-OR= 0.52 (95%CI 0.37 to 0.69)<br />

Recurrent PTCA -ARD= 6.8% in favour of stent<br />

-OR= 0.59 (95%CI 0.50 to 0.68)<br />

ARD= absolute risk difference<br />

Hill. Drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and economic evaluation. HTA 2007<br />

Design N/n Population Sd Interventions Outcomes Results<br />

MA N=17, -Coronary -Up to 3 -Bare metal stent Mortality<br />

No differences<br />

n>7000 artery disease years -Drug-eluting stent MI<br />

No differences<br />

(in most studies<br />

Revascularisation Typically 5% (DES) vs 10 to 25%<br />

exclusion of<br />

(BMS) at 1 year<br />

recent MI)<br />

SS difference in favour of DES<br />

Restenosis (> 50% SS difference in favour of DES<br />

narrowing of lumen<br />

after stenting)<br />

www.<strong>farmaka</strong>.be<br />

Project<br />

Farmaka

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!