The Quick Count and Election Observation

C H A P T E R T W O : G E T T I N G S T A R T E D
30
international organization. Leaders should seek financial support from
politically neutral sources, or ensure that backers are politically diverse
and balanced.
• Transparency—Publicizing funding sources can prevent suspicion and
deny critics the opportunity to make unfounded allegations or start rumors
about politically-motivated backers.
• Local v. International—Again, diversification is important, particularly for
the long run. Local donors may have more of a stake in the success of a
quick count. A local funding source may be more stable and reliable for
groups planning to continue work after the elections. Receiving support
from sources within the country may enhance the organization’s credibility
among local political players and the international community.
However, international institutions, including embassies, government aid
organizations and nongovernmental organizations and foundations potentially
offer larger sums of money. This is particularly true for institutions
from countries that have significant economic, geographical or other ties
to the country holding an election.
The first weeks of work on a quick count project are critical to
its eventual success. Leaders must:
• Evaluate the composition and duties of a board of directors;
• Hire qualified and dedicated staff;
• Invest significant time in strategic planning;
• Design realistic budgets; and
• Solicit funds using a variety of methods from a variety of sources.