27.10.2014 Views

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 RENAISSANCE AND SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY RATIONALISM<br />

name <strong>of</strong> Hobbes to the list <strong>of</strong> those philosophers who began to weaken the links<br />

between Christianity and philosophy. But it is not certain that they were right;<br />

the subject is one on which scholars still disagree. 46 What is certain is that<br />

Hobbes’s political philosophy, with its sombre view that a life that satisfies the<br />

demands <strong>of</strong> reason can be lived only under conditions <strong>of</strong> absolute rule, still<br />

fascinates philosophers. 47<br />

NOTES<br />

1 The arguments for this view have been clearly set out by Peter Burke in his book<br />

The Renaissance (London, Macmillan, 1987), pp. 1–5. Burke himself does not<br />

accept these arguments, saying (p. 5) that the term ‘the Renaissance’ is ‘an<br />

organising concept which still has its uses’.<br />

2 See, for example, C.B.Schmitt and Q.Skinner (eds) The Cambridge <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Renaissance <strong>Philosophy</strong> (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988:<br />

abbreviated, CHRP), p. 5.<br />

3 CHRP, Introduction, p. 3.<br />

4 C.B.Schmitt, in R.Sorabji (ed.) Philoponus and the Rejection <strong>of</strong> Aristotelian<br />

Science (London, Duckworth, 1988), p. 210.<br />

5 See, for example, the entries for ‘scholasticism’ and ‘medieval philosophy’ in J.<br />

O.Urmson and J.Rée (eds), The Concise Encyclopaedia <strong>of</strong> Western <strong>Philosophy</strong> and<br />

Philosophers (London, Unwin Hyman, 1989).<br />

6 London, Longman, 2nd edn, 1988, pp. 76–82. Dom David’s account applies to<br />

what one might call the golden age <strong>of</strong> scholasticism, up to the middle <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fourteenth century; on the new scholasticism <strong>of</strong> the late sixteenth century, see<br />

Stuart Brown in Chapter 2 <strong>of</strong> this volume, pp. 76, 81–3.<br />

7 cf. R.W.Southern, Grosseteste (Oxford, Clarendon, 1986), p. 32.<br />

8 See, for example, P.O.Kristeller, ‘Humanism’, in CHRP, pp. 113–37. One should<br />

stress the phrase ‘in the main’; humanism, like the Renaissance, has a long history,<br />

and in the late fifteenth and sixteenth centuries humanists became involved in a<br />

range <strong>of</strong> subjects from logic and science that do not fall within a simple five-part<br />

scheme. On this, see the chapters on humanism and science and humanism and<br />

philosophy in Jill Kraye (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance<br />

Humanism (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, forthcoming). See also<br />

Anthony Grafton, ‘Humanism, Magic and Science’, in A. Goodman and A.Mackay<br />

(eds) The Impact <strong>of</strong> Humanism on Western Europe (London, Longman, 1990), pp.<br />

99–117.<br />

9 See especially some remarks <strong>of</strong> the fifteenth-century Florentine chancellor<br />

Leonardo Bruni, quoted by B.P.Copenhaver, CHRP, p. 106.<br />

10 cf. Burke, op. cit.<br />

11 Cesare Vasoli, ‘The Renaissance Concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong>’, CHRP, p. 73.<br />

12 See especially J.Stephens, The Italian Renaissance (London, Longman, 1990), pp.<br />

xvi, 54, 137, 149.<br />

13 The phrase comes from Owen Chadwick, The Secularisation <strong>of</strong> the European Mind<br />

in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1975).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!