No. 1, 1998 - Tribology in Industry
No. 1, 1998 - Tribology in Industry No. 1, 1998 - Tribology in Industry
perature;4 VEarethecriteriaof similarityof thecuttinc process determined by the formulas [2-]: o-Il'nl. a r/- r.f d- G''(l sittylu " r-P=J 01 Dt - isthe radius of the rouncting of rhe curting edge of t! the tool;a is the temperature conductivify coefficient of themachined material; o=Bi, G=i'p'e arethe criteria of similarity of the cutting process; a1 and b1 are the thickness and *'iclth of the shear; y, f) and e are the angle of cutting eclge, Qt ^,- The value ofrT for the first fourgroups of the machined materialsisequal zero.Thisconfirmsthewell-knownfact that abrasive and adhesive kinds of the tool wear in cuttingofthesematerialsarenottypical. z - Student's criterion and F - the Fisher's criterion ::it:i:.:Tl': jiTl:1.::efficients are meaningful and teste, dependence. Representingtheobtaineddependenceintoformula(1) after some transformations we have the following: the angle of taper and the vertex Crrrr*-. Cn, !# o,I!L cr.(-)'' anglerespectively;irand.l.aretheheatconditioneffi- "' SV. S4u' \q ) ciencies of the treated and tool materials respectively; c. x, ),, z ate the values depended on the properties of the machined and tool materials. The criterion ot'^ oI ,uk", into account the inuuence of the abrasive and adhesive phenomena on the process of the cutting tool wear. The B V and E criteria show the influence of the ditfusive and oxidizing ones. N{arirnum value of the technological productivity accor- tling to formula (2) will be in the case .f Durable experinrents were made and experimental derta of other authors given in the papers [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] were used to determine the values of the coeffic ien'ts t'1,'x1, y 1, zl inlhe obtained criterion equation (3). The values of the coefficients c, .r; 1i z obtained after the mathematical processing of the experimental results are given in table 1' I c-u. arzu la;i''',-r v,nirtc=t-- -l (5) i,-.", j.i") ,/) | ft' lu"iJ | -${ttr'^-) 'EZt €tr 'I1-t1+21) u*o "J Tablc l. Vnlttts o.[ t/u cot'JJit'itnt.s itt fonruiln (3) Atier some transformations we obtain the formula (5). rtv tg1+ t6y . - ;' rnirt (6) I tttt' This conclition will be right in the case if the cutting speed derivative, cleterminecl from the expression (fi), is equal k=.1 for monocarbicre ru'gsren-cobart ',il.];,,|[T harcr aloys;k=1.8 :[:'J:il[:illji;#'{:,1iXi::ffi'jfil for bicarbide titaniurn-tungsten-cobalt alloys; k:1.5 for high-speed steel;/ is the ratio of heat condr.rction efficiencies of the trtol zrncl nrat:hinecl materilrls. Groups of tne materials I c After transformation of the obtained expression (7) we get the lormula for gefting the cutting speed which cor- 22 TiiboloSSt itt irulustry, Volunre 20, No. 1, 1998.
G-- tud.l ^. J I W (I+x).yyc1 Atzx .,t (o^\^' tar I a;) t i .I;Zt 'rt'-""'l I ) = 0(7) a t:zu responds to the maximum treatment productivity (formula B). So. we can drnw the following conclusion: the use of method of similarity theory allowed to get the universal dependence of the cr.rtting tool wear intensity on the parameters of the cutting process and the physical-mechanical and heat-physical properties of the machined and tool materiarls. The obtained dependence can be used to determine optimum of cost and treatment productivity cutting conditions; it can also be used to calculate machining error caused by the cutting tool wear; to choose the tool material grade for rrure and semipure turling and to control the cutting process including adap rive one. LITERATURE l lc;Dr; I l (8) [1.) Malchanov G.I. Increasing of treatment efficiency on the lathe with program control. - Soscow: Machinebuildin g, 1979.-240 p. [2.] Optimization of technological conditions of the mechanical working of the aircraft engine parts lV.F. Ileziazichrry, T.D. Kozlirn, A.V. Kortsto,,,1117s1t, V.V. Nepornilua,, A.N. Scmyotrs1,, T.V. Sharova, Y.P. Chiryakov" - Moscow: MAl, 1993. - 184 p. 13.) Loladze ZN. Strength and wear resistance of the cutting tool. - Mos.Jorv: Machinebuilding, 1982.-320 p. l4.l Mokarot, A"D.\Year and strength of the cutting toof s. - Moscorv: Machinebuilding, 7966. - 263 p. 15.l Makarov A.D. Optimization of cutting process. - Moscow: Machinebuilding, 1976. -278 p. [6.) I]obov I{F. Fundamentals of metal cutting theory. - Moscow: Machrnebuilding, 1975. - 344 p. [7.] Directory of the technologist machine-builder..In hvo v. V. 2 I editors A.G. Kosilot,a attd R.K. Mescheriakov. - Moscow: Machinebuilding, 1986, -496 p. [8.) Poduraet, ZN, Cutting of the hard treated rnate'ials. - Moscow: Macirinebuildine, 1974. -590 p Tiibologt irt ittdLstry, Volume 20, No. 1, 1998. L--)
- Page 2 and 3: YU ISSN 0354 - 8996 lll I I voLUME'
- Page 4 and 5: though there were also published ar
- Page 6 and 7: COMMANDING PARAMETERS constructlve
- Page 8 and 9: 30,0 FcL 25,0 t25 A. P= 01,/Po _,1
- Page 10 and 11: -l [- rf- iitlrll llili llll-l L _l
- Page 12 and 13: {rtcrial prclucral : l5 Cr08 K-70"
- Page 14 and 15: a I ;T_r -ra _ _l-.-rx.,'0!.$/d i_
- Page 16 and 17: - t--lr-lillli i I lL--iL --] r E t
- Page 18 and 19: yield stress of a gel rvas determin
- Page 20 and 21: c) The average percent:rge error re
- Page 24 and 25: f--r t1 tl tl I C) E. LU a trJ E [-
- Page 26 and 27: l, (.i, r.)1, Ilrl. llD- 1 45 1 _4n
- Page 28 and 29: Fig. 1. The basic groups of sealirr
- Page 30 and 31: sign parameters. They represent the
- Page 32: [5.) Clilds D. I]t., Nohtt A.5., Ki
perature;4 VEarethecriteriaof similarityof thecutt<strong>in</strong>c<br />
process determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the formulas [2-]:<br />
o-Il'nl.<br />
a<br />
r/-<br />
r.f d-<br />
G''(l sittylu "<br />
r-P=J<br />
01<br />
Dt - isthe radius of the rounct<strong>in</strong>g of rhe curt<strong>in</strong>g edge of<br />
t!<br />
the tool;a is the temperature conductivify coefficient of<br />
themach<strong>in</strong>ed material; o=Bi, G=i'p'e arethe<br />
criteria of similarity of the cutt<strong>in</strong>g process; a1 and b1 are<br />
the thickness and *'iclth of the shear; y, f) and e are the<br />
angle of cutt<strong>in</strong>g eclge,<br />
Qt<br />
^,-<br />
The value ofrT for the first fourgroups of the mach<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
materialsisequal zero.Thisconfirmsthewell-knownfact<br />
that abrasive and adhesive k<strong>in</strong>ds of the tool wear <strong>in</strong><br />
cutt<strong>in</strong>gofthesematerialsarenottypical.<br />
z - Student's criterion and F - the Fisher's criterion<br />
::it:i:.:Tl':<br />
jiTl:1.::efficients are mean<strong>in</strong>gful and<br />
teste, dependence.<br />
Represent<strong>in</strong>gtheobta<strong>in</strong>eddependence<strong>in</strong>toformula(1)<br />
after some transformations we have the follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
the angle of taper and the vertex Crrrr*-. Cn, !# o,I!L cr.(-)''<br />
anglerespectively;irand.l.aretheheatconditioneffi-<br />
"' SV. S4u'<br />
\q )<br />
ciencies of the treated and tool materials respectively; c.<br />
x, ),, z ate the values depended on the properties of the<br />
mach<strong>in</strong>ed and tool materials.<br />
The criterion ot'^<br />
oI<br />
,uk", <strong>in</strong>to account the <strong>in</strong>uuence of<br />
the abrasive and adhesive phenomena on the process of<br />
the cutt<strong>in</strong>g tool wear. The B V and E criteria show the<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluence of the ditfusive and oxidiz<strong>in</strong>g ones.<br />
N{arirnum value of the technological productivity accor-<br />
tl<strong>in</strong>g to formula (2) will be <strong>in</strong> the case .f<br />
Durable exper<strong>in</strong>rents were made and experimental derta<br />
of other authors given <strong>in</strong> the papers [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] were<br />
used to determ<strong>in</strong>e the values of the coeffic ien'ts t'1,'x1, y 1,<br />
zl <strong>in</strong>lhe obta<strong>in</strong>ed criterion equation (3).<br />
The values of the coefficients c, .r; 1i z obta<strong>in</strong>ed after the<br />
mathematical process<strong>in</strong>g of the experimental results are<br />
given <strong>in</strong> table 1'<br />
I c-u. arzu la;i''',-r<br />
v,nirtc=t-- -l (5)<br />
i,-.", j.i") ,/) |<br />
ft' lu"iJ | -${ttr'^-) 'EZt €tr 'I1-t1+21) u*o "J<br />
Tablc l. Vnlttts o.[ t/u cot'JJit'itnt.s itt fonruiln (3)<br />
Atier some transformations we obta<strong>in</strong> the formula (5).<br />
rtv<br />
tg1+ t6y . - ;' rnirt (6)<br />
I tttt'<br />
This conclition will be right <strong>in</strong> the case if the cutt<strong>in</strong>g speed<br />
derivative, cleterm<strong>in</strong>ecl from the expression (fi), is equal<br />
k=.1 for monocarbicre ru'gsren-cobart<br />
',il.];,,|[T<br />
harcr aloys;k=1.8 :[:'J:il[:illji;#'{:,1iXi::ffi'jfil<br />
for bicarbide titaniurn-tungsten-cobalt alloys; k:1.5 for<br />
high-speed steel;/ is the ratio of heat condr.rction efficiencies<br />
of the trtol zrncl nrat:h<strong>in</strong>ecl materilrls.<br />
Groups of tne materials I c<br />
After transformation of the obta<strong>in</strong>ed expression (7) we<br />
get the lormula for geft<strong>in</strong>g the cutt<strong>in</strong>g speed which cor-<br />
22 TiiboloSSt itt irulustry, Volunre 20, <strong>No</strong>. 1, <strong>1998</strong>.