Entire Transcript in Adobe Acrobat Format - National Reference ...

38
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
giving the overview you note quite correctly that most
people whose samples are among these hundreds of millions
that are being stored do not know that those samples are
stored because it was not an explicit part of the consent
process and it was never focused on.
That is not true for people whose samples were
taken for research. They at least know samples were taken
for research, they do not know about this research, they
may not know how long it is stored but at least they know
that someone took it to study it. Now that is a
distinction.
But if we look to the future and say not what I
was originally concerned about, sort of the dignitary
difference between having something done to a sample you do
not even know anyone has versus the other, but what risks
you are going to be exposed to. I can understand why you
ended up collapsing those.
Just to show that I am not totally pigheaded,
Tom, I can understand why.
But I do immediately when I think about the
risks see differences so I will wait and see whether the
collapsing that you have done, which apparently has been
done as to future samples in different people's view.
I mean, Zeke thought you collapsed research