Entire Transcript in Adobe Acrobat Format - National Reference ...

302
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
They would certainly want fair and consistent
enforcement of the regulatory compliance authorities. I
have added here, but you probably cannot read it, including
feedback to the regulated entities on the pitfalls to be
avoided. If entities are in noncompliance we owe them and
other entities an explanation of why that is the case and
try to put in some corrective measures.
And then I think another goal would be to have
actions again consistent with promoting protection of human
participants in an as a political a manner as possible.
Try to keep it shielded from politics and other goals that
divert us from really protecting people who are involved in
research.
Lastly, I think the regulated entities would
have some expectation of minimization of paperwork and
other administrative burdens consistent with the
accomplishment of protection goals. I also think an
important goal to preserve is decentralization and having
decisions made at the local level and the benefit of
understanding the local milieu so that there was not a big
centralized group that would dictate but that would have an
open system that would ebb and flow and collect information
and develop policies and procedures that could be
applicable but would help from the local perspective.