Entire Transcript in Adobe Acrobat Format - National Reference ...

290
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
into but having sort of come to that point I decided to
stop and go at it from a different perspective, which is
rather than making it global with the current definition,
to take a better system of encompassing all federal agency
research, which I believe is addressed in some of the
reports that you have had, and then adding in on a list
basis -- I am not fond as a principle of laundry lists and
I have strenuously opposed the laundry list approach to
definition of research misconduct. But I did explore
taking -- just listing known areas of research that put
human beings at risk and adding those whether conducted
privately or publicly to the scope of federal oversight.
Gary Ellis has defined seven areas in some of
the letters that he has written and he wrote me a letter
and he sent some copies of these. He made a presentation
at the PRIMER meeting recently where he defined seven areas
that are beyond the boundaries of existing regulations that
are places that questions have arisen and where there are
people potentially at risk.
Colleges and universities not receiving federal
research funds, some in vitro fertilization clinics, some
weight loss or diet clinics, some physician offices,
dentist offices, and psychotherapists offices.
One of the examples is the dentist who decides