Entire Transcript in Adobe Acrobat Format - National Reference ...

140
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
good but that is not to say they should not be changed or
refined in some way, and then by saying anyone who collects
and then distributes for purposes of research has to abide
by those principles. So if I am a local hospital and I
have got a doc in my local hospital who is doing this then
my IRB in that local hospital has to take on that
additional role of being sure it is done the best way to do
it. Now it is not cost efficient, I mean, what we are
again dealing with.
But where do we want to put our money in making
sure this works? I think we want to put it in the
fiduciary role of those who oversee distribution of tissue
and I think we want to put it in that panel that reviews
uses of tissue. That is where I think we are better -- we
are better protecting people rather than trying to
reconsent everybody who is in those archived collections of
individual pathologists. It is a judgment call and maybe
it is worth it.
I think the way I am suggesting allows us to
continue to use those archived tissues where reconsent
probably will not. So it is a compromise position.
DR. MURRAY: Thanks.
David?
DR. COX: Very rapidly, I really think that