Entire Transcript in Adobe Acrobat Format - National Reference ...

Entire Transcript in Adobe Acrobat Format - National Reference ... Entire Transcript in Adobe Acrobat Format - National Reference ...

bioethics.georgetown.edu
from bioethics.georgetown.edu More from this publisher
26.10.2014 Views

129 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 off a lot of choices for some participation? My view is yes. Others might not and they can say no. MR. CAPRON: And how do they say no? MS. BARR: They say no by not agreeing to research or not agreeing to other research in the consent but at least that gets out to the public, which has a number of benefits. It allows individuals to participate. It raises our confidence in the research enterprise because a lot of people are participating and there is some exposure. Now the issue of fiduciary -- MR. CAPRON: May I ask you -- DR. MURRAY: Alex, I am going to have to -- MR. CAPRON: Well, let me -- DR. MURRAY: In the interest of time, we have about 30 minutes left for all of this morning's conversation, unless it is really urgent I am going to ask just to let Pat finish. MS. BARR: Okay. On the issue of fiduciary you have identified the traditional notion of what a fiduciary is and I am perfectly willing to change the word but it seems to me that what we are talking about here is that the pathologist has to stand apart from his or her world as researcher and that they have no higher right to use the

130 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 tissue that they hold than anybody else. DR. MURRAY: Thank you. MR. CAPRON: And public confidence? MS. BARR: And the public confidence issue is exposure -- public exposure of this kind of debate. IRB's, local IRB's having a duty to inform their communities of what they do in some way through local hospital newsletters or whatever, guidelines for that sort of thing. Ensuring that communities of interest have a role in design of research and advisors to research panels, and advisors to consortiums. That would be a -- those three things would move us forward again incrementally but significantly. DR. MURRAY: I have noted Bernie, Zeke, Carol and David expressing an interest to say something. If anybody else does or I have missed them please let me know. Bernie? DR. LO: I want to thank you for your presentation and also the material you gave us. I have several questions all in the theme of trying to understand better the point of view of patients living with conditions for which these research might be done. First, you said -- I think your message came through very clearly about the urgent need to do research

129<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

off a lot of choices for some participation? My view is<br />

yes. Others might not and they can say no.<br />

MR. CAPRON: And how do they say no?<br />

MS. BARR: They say no by not agree<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

research or not agree<strong>in</strong>g to other research <strong>in</strong> the consent<br />

but at least that gets out to the public, which has a<br />

number of benefits. It allows <strong>in</strong>dividuals to participate.<br />

It raises our confidence <strong>in</strong> the research enterprise because<br />

a lot of people are participat<strong>in</strong>g and there is some<br />

exposure.<br />

Now the issue of fiduciary --<br />

MR. CAPRON: May I ask you --<br />

DR. MURRAY: Alex, I am go<strong>in</strong>g to have to --<br />

MR. CAPRON: Well, let me --<br />

DR. MURRAY: In the <strong>in</strong>terest of time, we have<br />

about 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes left for all of this morn<strong>in</strong>g's<br />

conversation, unless it is really urgent I am go<strong>in</strong>g to ask<br />

just to let Pat f<strong>in</strong>ish.<br />

MS. BARR: Okay. On the issue of fiduciary you<br />

have identified the traditional notion of what a fiduciary<br />

is and I am perfectly will<strong>in</strong>g to change the word but it<br />

seems to me that what we are talk<strong>in</strong>g about here is that the<br />

pathologist has to stand apart from his or her world as<br />

researcher and that they have no higher right to use the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!