Entire Transcript in Adobe Acrobat Format - National Reference ...

118
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
that research enterprise.
They become -- in a national system they are
not the arbiter of who gets to use the tissue they hold.
Now today they are the arbiters of who gets to use the
tissue they hold. So I am presenting a radically different
approach. But they do deserve adequate compensation for
the work they do in serving as fiduciary responsibility to
the research enterprise as a whole. I think that the model
that we put in place of a neutral third party, the IRB and
the tissue bank, is applicable to archival collections as
well as perspective collections but the standards for what
must be done in a population study or other study when we
are using archival tissue is obviously going to be somewhat
different than what it might be in a perspective situation.
(Slide.)
I am going to talk just briefly about
standardization and then I think I am done, almost done
anyway.
Standardization impacts donor participation and
I came to this enterprise because people wanted to help the
research process. Now that is a limited population. There
are populations that are much more skeptical than the
population I came from and there are portions of the
population that I speak for that are more skeptical than