26.10.2014 Views

Scientific Presentations Summer 2009 - Dana-Farber/Harvard ...

Scientific Presentations Summer 2009 - Dana-Farber/Harvard ...

Scientific Presentations Summer 2009 - Dana-Farber/Harvard ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Patient Acceptability of the Electronic Self Report<br />

Assessment Cancer Program (ESRA-C) Version 2 to Enhance<br />

Communication Between Patients and Clinicians<br />

Tanya Harrison<br />

Mentor: Donna Berry, PhD, RN, AOCN, FAAN<br />

<strong>Scientific</strong> Advisor: Barbara Halpenny, MA<br />

<strong>Dana</strong>-<strong>Farber</strong> Cancer Institute<br />

Assessing cancer symptoms and quality of life issues is essential for excellent clinical<br />

care in cancer patients. The Electronic Self Report Assessment-Cancer program<br />

(ESRA-C) version 1 was demonstrated to be an efficacious and acceptable method to<br />

cancer patients for reporting symptom and quality of life information to clinicians.<br />

ESRA-C version 2 is a further developed program that contains additional symptom<br />

questionnaires and has been used in a multi-site sample in a randomized clinical trial<br />

at two comprehensive cancer centers. The objective of this analysis is to determine<br />

if ESRA-C version 2 is as equally acceptable to patients as version 1 and whether<br />

acceptability differed in various demographics. We evaluated the average score of<br />

the five acceptability questions with response options ranging from one (not at all acceptable)<br />

to six (very much acceptable) among patients that have completed ESRA-C<br />

version 2. We also assessed demographics such as age, gender, and computer literacy.<br />

Results showed that 40% of the sample (n=65) are female, 40% are age 60 or older,<br />

and only 74% of the participants use a computer often or very often. There were no<br />

differences in acceptability of the program between men and women, patients under<br />

or over 60 years old, and frequent or non-frequent computer users. Although specific<br />

measures of acceptability varied between the two groups, the average acceptability<br />

score was lower in version 2. We conclude that ESRA-C version 2 is not as equally<br />

acceptable to patients as version 1 due to the amount of time it takes for the participants<br />

to complete the report.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!