26.10.2014 Views

Comprehensive strategies for active ageing - mutual learning ...

Comprehensive strategies for active ageing - mutual learning ...

Comprehensive strategies for active ageing - mutual learning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SUMMARY<br />

1. Introduction<br />

<strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong><br />

Thematic Review seminar of the Mutual Learning Programme<br />

of the European Employment Strategy<br />

Brussels, 20 April 2004<br />

Summary<br />

The Thematic Review seminar, held in Brussels on 20 th April 2005, was the second in a series of seminars<br />

which take place biannually in the framework of the ‘Mutual Learning Programme of the European Employment<br />

Strategy 1 ’. The theme of the second Thematic Review seminar reflected one of the major challenges facing the<br />

European Union in the coming years: demographic <strong>ageing</strong> and its economic and labour market implications.<br />

The Review was hosted by DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities of the European<br />

Commission (DG EMPL) and attended by government delegates, national and European stakeholders and<br />

social partners from EU member states, Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey, Norway and Iceland.<br />

The Thematic Review seminar was opened by Odile Quintin, Director General of DG EMPL and Maarten<br />

Camps, Chairman of the European Employment Committee. Odile Quintin outlined the challenges related to<br />

demographic <strong>ageing</strong> in Europe and the European Union’s policy response. Maarten Camps underlined the need<br />

to find rapid practical measures to raise participation rates in the labour market. Experts Jaap de Koning (SEOR<br />

B.V., Erasmus University Rotterdam) and Philip Taylor (University of Cambridge) presented papers on the<br />

challenges facing European labour markets and <strong>strategies</strong> to promote the employability of older workers. These<br />

were complemented by four country presentations which provided concrete examples of different strategy<br />

approaches: the United Kingdom and the Netherlands in the morning and Germany and Sweden in the<br />

afternoon. Both the morning and afternoon sessions were concluded with discussions on the country examples,<br />

and the day was rounded off with a panel discussion with representatives from the European social partners and<br />

OECD on the key issues covered by the seminar.<br />

2. Background and policy considerations - Opening Statements<br />

The opening statements by Odile Quintin and Maarten Camps provided the background and thematic framework<br />

<strong>for</strong> the second Thematic Review seminar of the Mutual Learning Programme. The fact that <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong> should<br />

have been singled out as a priority theme <strong>for</strong> the programme is indicative of its importance <strong>for</strong> the European<br />

labour market. In her opening statement, Odile Quintin remarked that the Lisbon target of having 50% of all 55-<br />

64-year-olds in employment would not be reached by 2010. More concerted action is needed at all levels to<br />

come even close to that target in the future, when demographic <strong>ageing</strong> will be particularly pronounced. One of<br />

the main barriers to reaching the target is the prevailing attitude in most member states that is still influenced by<br />

a culture of early retirement. The European Council of Barcelona (spring 2002) adopted two new targets: to raise<br />

the effective real retirement age in Europe and to provide more pre-school care facilities <strong>for</strong> children. Both are<br />

essential <strong>for</strong> increasing participation in the work<strong>for</strong>ce (of older workers and women in particular).<br />

1 The Mutual Learning Programme builds on the <strong>for</strong>mer Peer Review programme.<br />

See: http://www.<strong>mutual</strong>-<strong>learning</strong>-employment.net<br />

20 April 2005 Thematic Review Seminar <strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong><br />

1


SUMMARY<br />

Active <strong>ageing</strong> is not an issue that affects older workers in isolation but all members of society and a wide range<br />

of policy fields. Odile Quintin stressed that to age <strong>active</strong>ly you have to start young!<br />

Maarten Camps agreed with the points made by Odile Quintin in her opening statement and expressed the wish<br />

<strong>for</strong> concrete examples policies to attract and maintain people in the labour market. He argued that the evidence<br />

suggests that a range of incentives, <strong>for</strong> employers to maintain older workers in the work<strong>for</strong>ce and <strong>for</strong> employees<br />

to remain in work, could be effective and that it was there<strong>for</strong>e important to discuss and disseminate these.<br />

3. Thematic Expert Paper<br />

“Incentives to take up work and remain in work longer” – Jaap de Koning<br />

The Implications of the <strong>ageing</strong> process on the labour market<br />

Jaap de Koning’s paper focused on the implications <strong>for</strong> the labour market of demographic <strong>ageing</strong>. He outlined<br />

the possible impacts of the <strong>ageing</strong> process on the relative size of the work<strong>for</strong>ce, on participation rates and on<br />

productivity and innovation. He then looked at the role of incentives to keep older people in work, and at the<br />

challenges posed by <strong>ageing</strong> and policy responses to them.<br />

The impacts of the <strong>ageing</strong> process on the relative size of the population of working age between now and 2050<br />

are: a huge increase in the old age dependency ratio (i.e. the number of people over 65 divided by the number<br />

of people of working age); a rise in the share of the very old (80+); and a decrease in the share of young people.<br />

The latter may reduce pressure on the dependency ratio in countries with extremely low birth rates (e.g. some of<br />

the new member states), but accelerate the effects of <strong>ageing</strong> of the work<strong>for</strong>ce. These impacts will lead to an<br />

upward pressure on age-related public expenditure, a growth in the share of the <strong>active</strong> labour <strong>for</strong>ce needed <strong>for</strong><br />

care activities, negative effects on macro-economic productivity and higher tax rates (which may, in turn,<br />

generate a vicious circle reducing incentives to work and thereby pushing tax rates up even higher).<br />

Currently the participation rates of 50-65 year-olds in the work<strong>for</strong>ce are low (57.7% EU average in 2002). If one<br />

assumes that the current low labour market participation of this age category continues, the impacts of<br />

demographic <strong>ageing</strong> would be a drop of 10% in overall participation rates between 2000 and 2050 2 . The effect<br />

would be particularly acute <strong>for</strong> the countries of Central Europe. However, it is likely that the share of 50-65 yearolds<br />

in working age population will increase although the all-age participation rate will decline. Thus the overall<br />

impact of demographic <strong>ageing</strong> on participation rates will have a negative effect on the size of the labour <strong>for</strong>ce,<br />

and the level of employment, as well as macro-economic output and income.<br />

In terms of the impact of <strong>ageing</strong> on innovation and productivity, the existing evidence suggests that an older<br />

work<strong>for</strong>ce has negative effects on productivity and on innovation and productivity growth. However, the<br />

observed patterns may not be inevitable. Learning capacity stays intact if people continue to learn, older workers<br />

per<strong>for</strong>m equally well as younger workers in certain fields (which is an argument in favour of job mobility), and<br />

mobility and training throughout one's life positively affect per<strong>for</strong>mance later in life.<br />

Policy to date<br />

Incentives <strong>for</strong> employers to employ older workers are insufficient. The productivity-wage ratio is seen as<br />

unfavourable <strong>for</strong> these groups. Both younger and older workers appear to cost more than they produce whereas<br />

middle-aged workers produce more than they cost. Although there may be an 'implicit deal' between employers<br />

and employees regarding productivity-wage ratios over time, employers are unlikely to respect this if the<br />

government offers the option of using social benefit schemes as exit routes <strong>for</strong> older workers. In addition, older<br />

2 Burniaux, Duval and Jamotte (2004)<br />

20 April 2005 Thematic Review Seminar <strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong><br />

2


SUMMARY<br />

workers may be less adaptable and less able to cope with organisational and technological change. The high<br />

separation costs of older workers discourage employers from hiring them in the first place. Training older<br />

workers is often not very attr<strong>active</strong> <strong>for</strong> employers because the pay-off period is typically shorter than with<br />

younger workers. Even though it can be argued that older workers may be less likely to quit than their younger<br />

(upwardly mobile) colleagues, employers may still be wary of investing in them. There is also a common belief<br />

among employers that older workers get sick more frequently than younger ones. The behaviour of employers<br />

is, it can be argued, partly based on bias.<br />

The incentives <strong>for</strong> older employees to stay in employment are also insufficient. Early retirement was encouraged<br />

<strong>for</strong> many years in Europe in an attempt to reduce unemployment and provide jobs <strong>for</strong> the young. Jaap de Koning<br />

argued that such a policy was based on false assumptions (the so-called 'lump of labour fallacy') since it did not<br />

take into account that a reduction in supply can itself lead to a reduction in demand. Many countries, e.g. the<br />

Netherlands, developed early retirement schemes which made it possible <strong>for</strong> workers to retire between the ages<br />

of 55 and 60 with a relatively small decline in net income. The fact that, at this age, children have usually left<br />

home and mortgages are paid means that employees faced with this choice would often opt <strong>for</strong> leisure.<br />

Older workers have, in the past, tended to have relatively easy access to disability and unemployment benefits.<br />

These were also used as unofficial 'exit routes' by employers. Many EU member states (e.g. the Netherlands<br />

and the UK) have, in recent years, introduced stricter checks on people claiming disability benefits and have<br />

made it more difficult <strong>for</strong> people to remain on unemployment benefits until retirement without <strong>active</strong>ly looking <strong>for</strong><br />

work. The incentive to remain in employment or to look <strong>for</strong> work is thus heightened.<br />

Older employees often have the same negative attitude towards training as their employers, and may also<br />

believe that the individual pay-off period is too short to get positive returns from investment in training.<br />

Policy response<br />

The above analysis leads to the conclusion that the <strong>ageing</strong> process poses considerable challenges to society<br />

and that new policy measures are needed to ensure the future stability of per capita income growth. Jaap de<br />

Koning suggested that such policies should focus on two main objectives:<br />

– to increase labour <strong>for</strong>ce participation, in order to compensate <strong>for</strong> the expected decline in the labour <strong>for</strong>ce, and<br />

– to increase labour productivity and productivity growth.<br />

The fact that some countries (e.g. Sweden) have high rates of employment among older workers suggests that<br />

policy measures can make a difference. What might these be?<br />

Incentives to older workers to stay in work <strong>for</strong> longer. These may include the following measures:<br />

– Blocking the road to unofficial early retirement through social security benefits (disability and unemployment<br />

benefits)<br />

– Stimulating investment in human capital (training), in particular targeting individuals (e.g. through<br />

initiatives such as individual <strong>learning</strong> accounts and <strong>learning</strong> vouchers)<br />

– Making benefit entitlements and levels dependent on previous investment in human capital<br />

Incentives to employers. These may include:<br />

– 'Experience-rating' in social security schemes, under which in the contributions paid by employers<br />

increase according to the number of older workers they lay off<br />

– Reducing separation costs in combination with tax bonuses <strong>for</strong> employers who hire older workers<br />

– Subsidising wage costs or reducing social contributions/taxes<br />

– Increasing government support <strong>for</strong> training and mobility<br />

Other measures to encourage the participation of older workers in the labour <strong>for</strong>ce, include:<br />

– Active labour market policies raising the pension age<br />

– Making early retirement financially less attr<strong>active</strong> and making work pay<br />

20 April 2005 Thematic Review Seminar <strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong><br />

3


SUMMARY<br />

– Adjusting pension systems to discourage early retirement<br />

– Initiatives by the social partners<br />

Conclusions<br />

Jaap de Koning concluded that population <strong>ageing</strong> will almost certainly entail economic problems. Since many of<br />

the effects mentioned above will depend on the behavioural reactions of employers and workers, it is difficult to<br />

predict the extent of these problems. He reiterated the need <strong>for</strong> reducing incentives to early retirement and<br />

raising the incentives to remain in work or return to work among the 50-65 year-olds. He emphasised the need<br />

to complement incentives to employees with incentives to employers to take on or keep on older workers. He<br />

pointed out that empirical evaluations show that <strong>active</strong> labour market measures can also be very effective <strong>for</strong><br />

this age group. Finally, he stated that further research was needed into the interaction between measures and<br />

their unintended side-effects.<br />

4. Country examples – the United Kingdom and the Netherlands<br />

The country examples of the United Kingdom and the Netherlands had the specific aim of complementing the<br />

introductory paper by Jaap de Koning. The UK example focused on the British strategy of extending working life<br />

and the Dutch example concentrated on policies in the Netherlands aimed at improving the financial incentives<br />

<strong>for</strong> workers to retire later and <strong>for</strong> employers to retain older workers.<br />

4.1 The United Kingdom<br />

The UK strategy <strong>for</strong> extending working life was presented by James Elder from the Department <strong>for</strong> Work and<br />

Pensions. Of the 8.8 million people aged between 50 and state pension age 3 , 70.7% are in employment (a high<br />

rate compared with the European average), 2.1% are unemployed, and 27.2% are in<strong>active</strong>. 1.7million of this<br />

group are claiming benefits. A relatively high proportion of those people over 50 in employment are selfemployed.<br />

The evidence suggests that, in Britain, the decision to retire is largely a financial one and one taken<br />

at a household level with couples typically wanting to retire at the same time. There are marked regional<br />

differences in the employment rates of older people between, with the regions traditionally dominated by heavy<br />

industry (e.g. the North-East) have the lowest employment rates <strong>for</strong> people aged 50-plus , and the South-East<br />

and the South-West the highest. James Elder posed the question of why older people have lower than average<br />

employment rates, and argued that like most countries in the EU, the UK had, until recently, a culture of early<br />

retirement, which has only recently begun to be eroded. It is also no longer attr<strong>active</strong> <strong>for</strong> companies to<br />

restructure using early retirement as a tool and it is more difficult <strong>for</strong> workers to claim sickness and incapacity<br />

benefits. Age discrimination is still prevalent and endemic, however, and was described as 'the last sociallytolerated<br />

<strong>for</strong>m of discrimination' in the UK. The caring roles of older workers (e.g. <strong>for</strong> <strong>ageing</strong> parents) should also<br />

not be underestimated as a factor contributing to their lower employment rates.<br />

Research shows that the reasons older people tend to give <strong>for</strong> early labour market exit are ill-health (46%),<br />

redundancy (16%) and to spend time with partner or family (11%). A high proportion do not leave the labour<br />

market through their own wishes, however, and 60% are involuntarily out of work.<br />

The reasons older people give <strong>for</strong> not seeking work are mainly health reasons (50%), because they regard<br />

themselves as retired or because financially they do not need to work (22%), care duties (12%) and inability to<br />

find a job (2%).<br />

3 i.e. 50-64 <strong>for</strong> men and 50-59 <strong>for</strong> women.<br />

20 April 2005 Thematic Review Seminar <strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong><br />

4


SUMMARY<br />

Qualifications are a decisive influence on the labour market participation of older workers, with better educated<br />

people having higher rates of employment at all ages. Levels of education are gradually changing, with<br />

significantly more people from 50 to state pension age with qualifications nowadays than in the early 1990s.<br />

Older workers are, however, still less likely to be offered training by their employers and less likely to take the<br />

opportunity to train. Despite this, there is evidence to suggest that the skills and experience of older workers<br />

makes up <strong>for</strong> their relative lack of qualifications.<br />

Given the above picture, what is the rationale <strong>for</strong> UK government involvement? Firstly, the government is<br />

interested because of economic contribution effects. Secondly, it is interested because of its role in pension<br />

provision, and thirdly because of its policy agenda of 'equality and opportunity <strong>for</strong> all'.<br />

The government response has been to introduce the target of raising the employment rate of the 50-69-yearolds.<br />

This will be achieved through a number of measures including: the New Deal 50-plus, a tailored <strong>active</strong><br />

labour market policy <strong>for</strong> over-50-year-olds involving advice, back-to-work support and financial support <strong>for</strong> inwork<br />

skills training; and the ‘Pathways to Work’ programme, a pilot scheme to get people on incapacity benefits<br />

back to work involving health and rehabilitation methods as well as advice and financial incentives. Further<br />

initiatives include ‘Age Positive’ and the ‘Employer Guidance Campaign’, campaigns which promote age<br />

diversity in the workplace and encourage employers to hire and keep on older workers. The government has<br />

also increased the options <strong>for</strong> deferring state pensions and has raised the minimum age <strong>for</strong> drawing a private<br />

pension to 55, and put <strong>for</strong>ward proposals to raise the public sector pension age to 65. It has also introduced the<br />

possibility of drawing a pension and continuing to work (e.g. part-time) <strong>for</strong> the same employer.<br />

In the field of skills, the government has developed a number of initiatives which, while not specifically targeted<br />

at older workers, will also be of benefit to many older workers. These include, the New Deal <strong>for</strong> Skills, the<br />

Employer Training Pilots (with financial support to SMEs who release their workers <strong>for</strong> training), the Trade Union<br />

Learning Fund, and the establishment of a range of sectoral, regional and local bodes whose responsibilities<br />

include the addressing of demographic change and skills needs. In conclusion, James Elder outlined the UK<br />

strategy <strong>for</strong> the future. In particular, there is a five-year plan which includes the target of an 80% all-age<br />

employment rate, which implies an extra million over-50s in work. The plan includes help <strong>for</strong> those out of work<br />

and support <strong>for</strong> retaining workers.<br />

4.2. The Netherlands<br />

Aart Jan Bette from the Dutch Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment started his intervention with a brief<br />

description of the development of the labour participation of older workers in the Netherlands, and the<br />

determinants of early retirement. He portrayed the institutional factors influencing the behaviours of employers<br />

and employees, and the recent financial policies that have been introduced to encourage the increased<br />

participation of older workers in the labour market.<br />

The participation rate of older workers in the Netherlands has increased steadily from 31.2% in 1999 to 39.8% in<br />

2004 (based on the Dutch definition, which counts only jobs of at least 12 hours a week. Using the EU definition<br />

(which counts all jobs), then a participation rate of 45% can be expected by 2007. The reasons <strong>for</strong> this rise are<br />

twofold: the first is demographic (among 55-64 year-olds, the share of relatively <strong>active</strong> persons in the age group<br />

55-59 has been rising) and the second is behavioural (an overall trend to retire later).<br />

The behaviour of employees and employers regarding early retirement is partly determined by institutional<br />

factors and incentives to retire. Employees will weigh up the gains in terms of leisure compared to the relative<br />

decline in income, and employers will weigh up the cost of separation in relation to the investments needed to<br />

retain workers and the differences between productivity and pay. The policy challenge is to redesign institutional<br />

arrangements so as to internalise the costs <strong>for</strong> society of individual decisions on early retirement.<br />

In the Netherlands, policy measures have been introduced in the areas covering the three main exit routes <strong>for</strong><br />

older workers from the labour market: early retirement and pre-pension schemes, unemployment benefit<br />

20 April 2005 Thematic Review Seminar <strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong><br />

5


SUMMARY<br />

schemes, and disability benefit schemes. In November 2004, the government and social partners reached an<br />

agreement on re<strong>for</strong>ms of early retirement schemes and disability benefit schemes. Changes are also expected<br />

in unemployment benefit schemes, pending the advice of the Dutch Social Economic Council.<br />

Early retirement and pre-pension schemes<br />

In the Netherlands, two broad types of early retirement scheme exist: voluntary early retirement schemes (VUT)<br />

and pre-pension schemes. VUT schemes were popular in the 1980s as a means to allow older workers to retire<br />

to make room <strong>for</strong> younger workers. They were financed on a pay-as-you-go basis and were there<strong>for</strong>e an<br />

expensive burden on workers remaining in the labour market. In most cases they presented no incentives to<br />

work longer since the benefit levels were largely independent of the number of years of contributions made. In<br />

addition, VUT schemes benefited from a favourable tax treatment.<br />

In the second half of the 1990s, the VUT schemes were gradually trans<strong>for</strong>med into more actuarially fair prepension<br />

schemes on a funded basis. Early retirement was thereby no longer made so attr<strong>active</strong> in comparison to<br />

working longer, but contributions under the trans<strong>for</strong>med schemes still benefited from a favourable tax treatment.<br />

In November 2004, however, the government reached an agreement with the social partners that the favourable<br />

tax treatment of collective early retirement schemes will end. Under the new system a distinction is made<br />

between the taxation of the funded pre-pension schemes and that of the pay-as-you-go VUT schemes. The<br />

entitlements under the funded pre-pensions are covered by the capital saved in the fund. Contributions are no<br />

longer tax-deductible and the capital in the fund is taxed under existing rules <strong>for</strong> wealth tax. The introduction of<br />

the new rules has been softened by transition periods (up to 2011) and exempted groups (over 55 year-olds). It<br />

is also still possible to retire early under the regular old age pensions schemes, on condition of actuarial<br />

fairness. A further option is the new 'individual life course saving scheme'. This scheme can be used to take time<br />

off <strong>for</strong> family obligations or <strong>for</strong> early retirement. It differs from current early retirement schemes in that it is<br />

individually-based (rather than collective) and fully-funded.<br />

Disability benefit scheme<br />

The second, and perhaps the most used, route <strong>for</strong> early retirement is the disability benefit scheme.<br />

In 2005, legislation <strong>for</strong> a new system of occupational disability schemes will be finalised and should come into<br />

effect on 1 st January 2006. The new system gives more responsibility to the employer and to the employee<br />

during the first two years of illness. The employer has to continue to pay wages <strong>for</strong> two years, and occupational<br />

disability benefit is granted only to those considered permanently unfit <strong>for</strong> work. For people who are considered<br />

partially unfit <strong>for</strong> work, benefits are dependent on them using their remaining capacity to work to their full ability.<br />

Despite the stricter regulations and restrictions, benefits will remain high <strong>for</strong> those who are considered unfit <strong>for</strong><br />

work.<br />

Unemployment benefit scheme<br />

The third exit route <strong>for</strong> older workers is unemployment benefits. These are relatively generous and long in<br />

duration in the Netherlands (equal to 70% of last wage, and paid <strong>for</strong> up to a maximum of five years). Until<br />

recently, the unemployed could benefit from a follow-up benefit after the expiration of the unemployment benefit.<br />

This was set at 70% of the minimum wage and workers over 57.5 years of age were entitled to this benefit until<br />

retirement age. Unemployed people over 57.5 years of age were also not obliged to continue to look <strong>for</strong> work. In<br />

effect, the scheme provided a route to early retirement <strong>for</strong> workers over 57.5 years old. The follow-up benefit<br />

was abolished in August 2003. The obligation to look <strong>for</strong> work was re-introduced in January 2004. Further<br />

re<strong>for</strong>ms are pending the advice of the Social Economic Council in April 2005.<br />

In his conclusion, Aart Jan Bette emphasised the role of the social partners in the process of re<strong>for</strong>ming the<br />

benefit systems to discourage early retirement. The impact of legislation on behaviour is largely dependent on<br />

the negotiations between employers and employees. A further policy lesson from the Dutch example is that a<br />

20 April 2005 Thematic Review Seminar <strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong><br />

6


SUMMARY<br />

holistic approach to policy re<strong>for</strong>m is needed to prevent a substitution effect of one exit route <strong>for</strong> another. Finally,<br />

the reduction of financial incentives to early retirement is a key element in the ef<strong>for</strong>ts to encourage participation,<br />

but it should be emphasised that they are not the only incentives that can be effective.<br />

5. Thematic Expert paper<br />

“Strategies to promote employability of older workers” – Philip Taylor<br />

In his paper, Philip Taylor considered the issues of extending working lives and of promoting age equality in the<br />

labour market. He first described the history of older workers and the labour market, then the imperative <strong>for</strong><br />

change, posed by labour shortages and the potential unsustainability of pension systems, concluding with an<br />

overview of possible solutions in the <strong>for</strong>m of new policies <strong>for</strong> older workers.<br />

History<br />

Regarding the history of older workers and the labour market Philip Taylor emphasised the collusion between<br />

government, social partners and older workers on early retirement. There has been widespread utilisation of<br />

other exit routes, e.g. disability benefits and unemployment benefits. He also remarked on the endemic ageism<br />

in the labour market, although individual employers often have a very positive attitude towards older workers.<br />

He also emphasised that the decline in the labour <strong>for</strong>ce participation of older workers has been long-term. The<br />

following table shows how the rates have changed in the EU-15 and in the USA and Japan.<br />

Labour <strong>for</strong>ce participation rates among people aged 55-64<br />

Men<br />

Women<br />

1979 1983 1990 1995 2000 2003 1979 1983 1990 1995 2000 2003<br />

Austria - - - 42.6 44.5 42.3 - - - 18.8 18.9 20.0<br />

Belgium - 50.6 35.4 35.9 36.3 39.4 - 12.3 9.9 13.3 15.8 18.0<br />

Denmark - 67.2 69.2 67.9 64.5 70.8 - 41.7 45.8 40.1 48.2 55.2<br />

Finland 56.3 54.1 47.1 41.6 48.1 55.8 41.3 47.4 40.8 42.9 45.2 52.4<br />

France 69.9 53.6 45.8 41.5 41.6 - 39.0 32.7 31.1 30.9 32.9 -<br />

Germany 66.9 63.1 58.3 52.7 55.2 52.0 28.4 26.3 27.5 28.1 34.1 34.3<br />

Greece - 70.8 59.5 61.1 57.3 60.7 - 25.7 24.3 24.5 25.5 26.8<br />

Ireland 77.9 78.0 65.1 63.9 64.7 66.5 20.1 20.2 19.9 21.2 27.8 34.1<br />

Italy 37.6 36.8 51.7 44.1 42.2 44.4 10.5 10.5 15.0 13.8 15.9 19.3<br />

Luxembourg - 37.8 43.2 35.1 38.6 - - 14.7 13.8 13.3 16.8 -<br />

Netherlands 65.3 54.2 45.7 41.4 50.8 58.7 14.4 14.4 16.7 18.6 26.4 32.9<br />

Portugal 75.6 70.4 66.5 60.7 65.0 64.7 32.4 33.7 32.3 34.3 43.4 43.5<br />

Spain 77.6 71.5 62.4 54.9 60.3 62.9 21.9 20.3 19.5 19.9 22.7 25.8<br />

Sweden 79.2 77.0 75.3 70.4 72.8 75.5 54.5 59.7 65.8 63.4 65.9 69.5<br />

UK - 71.5 68.1 62.4 63.3 67.9 - - 38.7 40.8 42.6 47.3<br />

EU - - 56.6 51.5 53.0 56.4 - - 26.5 27.0 31.0 33.7<br />

Japan 85.2 84.7 83.3 84.8 84.1 83.0 45.4 46.1 47.2 48.5 49.7 49.3<br />

USA 72.8 69.4 67.8 66.0 67.3 68.7 41.7 41.5 45.2 49.2 51.8 56.6<br />

Source: OECD Employment Outlook (various)<br />

20 April 2005 Thematic Review Seminar <strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong><br />

7


SUMMARY<br />

The imperative<br />

There are increasing concerns in the EU over the effects of population <strong>ageing</strong>, and the sustainability of pension<br />

systems and labour supply. Population <strong>ageing</strong> may result in a slowing of labour <strong>for</strong>ce growth, increased<br />

dependency rates and a 'greying' of the labour <strong>for</strong>ce. The policy response has so far concentrated mainly on the<br />

re<strong>for</strong>m of retirement income systems, with a move away from early retirement schemes towards flexible <strong>for</strong>ms of<br />

retirement. Governments are emphasising the importance of having a mixed-age labour <strong>for</strong>ce but are making<br />

few policy ef<strong>for</strong>ts in the direction of <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong>. The emphasis has been more on removing incentives to retire<br />

early rather than on encouraging people to remain in work <strong>for</strong> longer. There are still conflicting policies in some<br />

countries (e.g. in the Netherlands where the initiative <strong>for</strong> longer working lives was undermined by a senior<br />

minister calling <strong>for</strong> early retirement from the civil service), but others have managed to introduce integrated<br />

policy packages, e.g. Finland and the UK.<br />

In particular, Finland’s Programme on Ageing Workers is an integrated programme which brought together<br />

different ministries and the social partners to initiate a wide range of measures, e.g. awareness-raising, business<br />

support, flexible retirement arrangements, support to health professionals, support <strong>for</strong> older workers themselves,<br />

and legislative and pension re<strong>for</strong>ms 4 .<br />

The UK established a Ministerial Group <strong>for</strong> Older People to co-ordinate work across government departments,<br />

but despite some progress in joining up policy, more needs to be done to co-ordinate policies in some areas.<br />

Policy solutions<br />

Philip Taylor went on to outline a number of public policies and collective agreements at EU level. The EU Equal<br />

Treatment Directive has been implemented in a rather piecemeal fashion. Some countries already had<br />

legislation outlawing age discrimination be<strong>for</strong>e the Directive was introduced, e.g. Finland and, outside the EU,<br />

the USA, some Australian states, Canada and Japan. Elsewhere, older workers have specific protection against<br />

dismissal fixed in collective agreements though not all workers are covered, e.g. Germany. There is limited<br />

evidence to date on the impact of legislation. However, legislation appears to have largely eliminated overt<br />

discrimination, although research results point to modest effects on employment rates.<br />

Awareness raising<br />

One of the main challenges in encouraging the participation of older workers in the labour market is changing<br />

attitudes. Awareness-raising and business support has been introduced with some success in the UK, Germany,<br />

Denmark, Finland and the Netherlands. The UK has a Code of Practice on Age Diversity <strong>for</strong> employers and the<br />

Age Positive campaign. The Danish government has sponsored seminars on age and employment <strong>for</strong> business.<br />

The Finnish Programme on Ageing Workers contained free support to small firms and the Netherlands has<br />

campaigning bodies – the National Office Against Age Discrimination and the Task<strong>for</strong>ce on Ageing Workers –<br />

working in the field of awareness-raising. Evidence suggests that the results of such campaigns are positive but<br />

modest.<br />

Active labour market policy<br />

Active labour market policies targeting older workers are beginning to emerge. In the UK, the New Deal 50 Plus<br />

was introduced in 2000 <strong>for</strong> those out of work <strong>for</strong> six months or more. Participation in the programme is voluntary<br />

and open to those on any kind of benefit as well as to those who are registered unemployed. It offers practical<br />

help from a personal adviser regarding job search skills, travel costs <strong>for</strong> interviews, work trials, and an in-work<br />

training grant.<br />

4 The Finish Programme on Ageing Workers has been the subject of two Peer Reviews. The Summaries of the Reviews and<br />

the expert papers can be found on the MLP website under http://www.<strong>mutual</strong>-<strong>learning</strong>-employment.net<br />

20 April 2005 Thematic Review Seminar <strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong><br />

8


SUMMARY<br />

Lifelong <strong>learning</strong><br />

Lifelong <strong>learning</strong> is a further factor in raising participation in the labour market. France has an inter-sectoral<br />

agreement between the social partners concerning lifelong <strong>learning</strong>. Employees with 20 years’ work experience<br />

and all employees over 45 are eligible <strong>for</strong> a skills audit after having been with their employer <strong>for</strong> 12 months.<br />

They are given prioritised access to the recognition of their work experience. After two years, they are eligible <strong>for</strong><br />

a careers guidance interview within their company. They get a ‘Training Passport’ which remains in their<br />

possession. The agreement also establishes a 20 hour annual training entitlement with no age limit, and<br />

employees who lose their jobs can keep their unused credit. The key question is whether such a policy will be<br />

effective in a strong exit culture such as that found in France.<br />

Framing policy<br />

Philip Taylor stressed that policy needs to be integrated and strategic. Ageism is not just a matter of individual<br />

prejudice; it is institutionalised in the labour market and other social and economic systems. Active <strong>ageing</strong> is<br />

also more than just about work. What is needed is ‘joined-up policy-making’ – to coin a British phrase – in which<br />

different strands of government are drawn together. It would also appear that a more holistic, life-course<br />

approach to <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong> is the way <strong>for</strong>ward rather than an age-specific approach. A preventative approach is<br />

also better than a remedial one although, given the current situation, the latter is now also necessary. Localised,<br />

bottom-up initiatives should also be encouraged, e.g. outreach and community work. Firms need tailored<br />

solutions, and sector bodies and trade unions should be encouraged to come up with such initiatives.<br />

In conclusion, Philip Taylor warned that closing doors to early exit may result in some older workers being <strong>for</strong>ced<br />

into low status and insecure employment, while others with remote job prospects may be denied a dignified exit<br />

from the labour market.<br />

6. Country examples – Germany and Sweden<br />

The country examples from Germany and Sweden provided concrete examples of <strong>strategies</strong> to promote the<br />

employability of older workers.<br />

6.1. Germany<br />

Peter Jülicher from the Federal Ministry of Economy and Labour in Germany first described the situation in<br />

Germany, which has an employment rate <strong>for</strong> older workers which is still below the EU average (Germany 39.5%<br />

and EU 40.2% in 2003) in spite of an upward trend in recent years. In the year 2004, a rise of 2% in the<br />

employment rate was registered. The aim in Germany is to raise employment rates to 50%, in line with the<br />

European Employment Strategy target. A further aim is to raise the average effective age of exit from the labour<br />

market by five years.<br />

The strategy in Germany is to reduce the incentives to retire early (e.g. by re<strong>for</strong>ming the retirement system, by<br />

introducing a 'stick and carrot' system, by reducing the duration of unemployment benefits from 32 to 18 months<br />

from 2006); to develop <strong>active</strong> labour market policy <strong>for</strong> the integration of older workers and to raise awareness.<br />

The German Federal Government in co-operation with the Länder, the social insurance institutions and the<br />

social partners introduced an awareness-raising initiative, INQA (Initiative Neue Qualität der Arbeit), with the aim<br />

of promoting a 'new quality of work' <strong>for</strong> older workers, which is seen as having the following ingredients:<br />

– flexible working conditions<br />

– lifelong <strong>learning</strong><br />

20 April 2005 Thematic Review Seminar <strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong><br />

9


SUMMARY<br />

– health protection<br />

– improvement of workplaces<br />

– ensuring the employability of older workers<br />

In an ef<strong>for</strong>t to change attitudes from a 'deficit model' to a 'competence model' of older workers, the INQA offers a<br />

very broad range of activities <strong>for</strong> companies and individuals. To ensure the employability of older workers it<br />

introduced the initiative '30, 40, 50 plus – healthy work into old age' which collects and disseminates good<br />

practice on enhancing the employability of older workers, promotes networking between numerous institutions<br />

with projects and activities on demographic change, and advises SMEs on the management of demographic<br />

change within the company. The campaign has reached approximately 30,000 companies to date including Ford<br />

Cologne and Rowenta.<br />

A range of <strong>active</strong> labour market policy measures has also been introduced in Germany. These include<br />

vocational training <strong>for</strong> older workers in SMEs, job rotation, recruitment subsidies <strong>for</strong> older workers, and wage<br />

safeguards <strong>for</strong> older workers. The take-up of these initiatives was seen as somewhat disappointing with only<br />

80,000 older workers participating. The government’s aim is to encourage more companies to take up these<br />

measures.<br />

In conclusion, Peter Jülicher argued that a lot had been done but that no fundamental change of attitude had yet<br />

taken place. In March 2005, in a continuation of the 'Agenda 2010' initiative, the Federal Chancellor announced<br />

the introduction of employment pacts <strong>for</strong> older workers. Negotiations will start with employers in April regarding<br />

the better use of labour market policy instruments <strong>for</strong> the reintegration of older workers. The possibility of<br />

creating 50,000 additional jobs is being discussed with the Länder, and a competition <strong>for</strong> good practices in <strong>active</strong><br />

<strong>ageing</strong> at regional level is to be launched.<br />

6.2. Sweden<br />

Carina Cronsoie from the Ministry of Industry, Employment and Communications described the labour market<br />

situation of older workers in Sweden be<strong>for</strong>e outlining the policies in place to promote the labour <strong>for</strong>ce<br />

participation of older workers.<br />

The situation of older workers on the labour market<br />

The employment rate of older workers, in particular that of women, is still very high by international standards<br />

(68.6% overall, 66.3% <strong>for</strong> women, 70.8% <strong>for</strong> men in 2004). The high percentage of older people in employment<br />

is partly due to a cohort effect: baby-boomers who joined the labour <strong>for</strong>ce in the 1960s have stayed in<br />

employment. It is also due to the rising levels of education of the new generation of older workers (due to better<br />

initial education and lifelong <strong>learning</strong>), and is rein<strong>for</strong>ced by labour legislation which stipulates 'last in, first out'<br />

which mostly benefits older employees. The latter can, however, lead to reduced mobility since workers are<br />

reluctant to leave secure jobs even if they are no longer really suitable. Job mobility is recognised as giving<br />

people opportunities to develop new skills and improve their employability. A further explanation <strong>for</strong> the high<br />

levels of employment in Sweden is the long history of commitment to the work and skills principle, alongside<br />

<strong>active</strong> labour market policies targeted at older workers. Employment in Swedish labour market policy has always<br />

taken precedence over labour market programmes or the passive payment of benefits. Other relevant features<br />

of the Swedish institutional landscape are an individualised tax system that makes work pay, also <strong>for</strong> older<br />

women, and well-developed public care systems <strong>for</strong> children and old people.<br />

20 April 2005 Thematic Review Seminar <strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong><br />

10


SUMMARY<br />

Policy response<br />

In spite of a very positive track record, Sweden is <strong>active</strong>ly promoting an <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong> policy which concentrates<br />

on promoting employability and health in the workplace. A relatively high percentage of people who exit the<br />

labour market early do so <strong>for</strong> health reasons, and their main source of income after leaving the work<strong>for</strong>ce is<br />

sickness or disability benefit. There is also a trend toward longer sick leaves with a correlated rise in the<br />

likelihood of exiting the labour market early if nothing is done to adapt the workplace or the activity to the<br />

changing needs of older workers.<br />

Changes have been introduced in recent years to the social security system to discourage early retirement by<br />

promoting <strong>active</strong> labour market policy and work-related rehabilitation.<br />

Pension system<br />

The nature of the pension system is a major factor in the decision of older workers to remain in the work<strong>for</strong>ce.<br />

Sweden’s new pension system will no longer limit the period during which contributions can be made. The<br />

earliest retirement age will be set at 61 and there will be no upper limit. The compulsory retirement age was<br />

already raised from 65 to 67 in 2001. It will also be possible to combine drawing a pension and working parttime,<br />

thus postponing the final retirement age. A special commission has been assigned the task of drawing up a<br />

proposal <strong>for</strong> legislation on this issue by December 2005.<br />

'Career transition agreements' are a further initiative deserving a mention here. These were developed by<br />

employer organisations and the trade unions and can be seen as complementing and assisting labour market<br />

policy. They provide <strong>active</strong> support <strong>for</strong> redundant workers in the <strong>for</strong>m of collective agreements whose purpose is<br />

to help such workers find new jobs. They include various transition measures, from job-seeking advice and<br />

counselling to employment training and support <strong>for</strong> people to set up their own business. Evaluations have shown<br />

the career transition agreements to have positive effects: the risk of unemployment is reduced and most<br />

employees find a new job in a relatively short space of time.<br />

Labour market policy<br />

The unemployment rate among older workers is still below average in Sweden and falling. However, older<br />

workers who lose their job find it difficult to find another one. Approximately 50% of the long-term unemployed<br />

are over the age of 55. As in other countries, this is still a major problem in Sweden and although there are no<br />

specific measures <strong>for</strong> older workers in Sweden, the matter is given special attention in the framework of <strong>active</strong><br />

labour market policy.<br />

In this context, one useful tool is the Activity Guarantee. This is a full-time programme <strong>for</strong> the long-term<br />

unemployed which is intended to break the vicious cycle between labour market programmes and<br />

unemployment benefit by providing a stable and sustainable full-time activity until participants can find a job. It<br />

involves the <strong>for</strong>mulation of an individual action plan and can include all the traditional labour market measures<br />

such as training, rehabilitation and work experience. An important feature of the Activity Guarantee programme<br />

is co-operation between the business community, the municipalities, state employers and the trade unions. Also<br />

worth mentioning is 'Forum 50 plus', a non governmental organisation which runs a project <strong>for</strong> unemployed<br />

people over 50 in co-operation with the public employment service and the social partners.<br />

Carina Cronsioe concluded by emphasising the responsibility of government to carry out research into older<br />

workers in the labour market, and to ensure that Sweden’s policies and labour market continue to be inclusive<br />

and open to people of all ages. Age diversity and inter-generational management will become increasingly<br />

important in future to avoid conflicts between older and younger workers.<br />

20 April 2005 Thematic Review Seminar <strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong><br />

11


SUMMARY<br />

7. Panel Discussion<br />

The final session of the Thematic Review seminar was devoted to a panel discussion of key issues from the<br />

seminar with representatives from UNICE, ETUC and the OECD. Józef Niemiec, Confederal Secretary of the<br />

European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) opened the discussion by briefly outlining the position of the<br />

ETUC on the issues raised during the meeting so far. The first was the issue of quality of work and flexibility. It<br />

was important to maintain high quality jobs while encouraging flexibility in the work<strong>for</strong>ce. He emphasised<br />

regional differences regarding the situation of older workers in the labour market, and regarding policy<br />

approaches. Even within one country, approaches could vary widely between regions. From the point of view of<br />

the trade unions, lifelong <strong>learning</strong> was seen as a key factor contributing to employability and should be started<br />

young. Health was also an issue which should not be reserved <strong>for</strong> older workers. The ETUC is in favour of an<br />

inter-generational approach which avoids segmentation and discrimination. Józef Niemiec pointed out that those<br />

member states which had managed to raise the employment rates of older workers also had relatively high rates<br />

of youth and female employment. He argued that there was too much concentration on financial questions and<br />

not enough on fiscal issues. The fiscal system puts companies with a large work<strong>for</strong>ce at a disadvantage. While it<br />

was important to re<strong>for</strong>m pension systems, the pre-pension schemes should not be completely discarded in<br />

certain specific cases. Józef Niemiec was of the opinion that raising the retirement age was not yet an issue.<br />

Rather, he argued that it was more important to get those under retirement age but in<strong>active</strong> back into the labour<br />

<strong>for</strong>ce. On the use of disincentives to early retirement, reductions in the duration of unemployment benefits or the<br />

practice of adapting salaries to per<strong>for</strong>mance and productivity, he remarked that these were not very positive <strong>for</strong><br />

older workers. A further social dialogue on these themes was essential, in his view.<br />

Thérèse de Liederkerke from UNICE (Union des Industries de la Communauté Européenne) began her<br />

statement with a reminder that although it is right to take a European perspective on the issue of <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong>, it<br />

is important not to <strong>for</strong>get that Europe and its workers are heterogeneous. She posed the question of whether it<br />

made sense to think in terms of older workers as one group, and argued that their situation in the labour market<br />

was influenced by their initial education, training, careers and policy. Regarding anti-discrimination legislation,<br />

she argued that it would often be irrational <strong>for</strong> employers to employ an older person given the legal framework<br />

and that anti-discrimination legislation was not the answer. However, the current European Employment<br />

Strategy appears to be going in the right direction, in particular the emphasis on a preventive, lifecycle approach.<br />

She argued in favour of moving towards per<strong>for</strong>mance models of pay – which would not, of course, necessarily<br />

benefit older workers in terms of remuneration, but may make them more employable. She also argued in favour<br />

of re<strong>for</strong>ming social security systems to avoid pre-pension traps. Finally, she raised the care issue e.g. of <strong>ageing</strong><br />

parents (in-law) which keeps older women out of the labour market. She argued that men also have parents and<br />

that caring <strong>for</strong> them should also be their concern.<br />

Martin Kees, head of the older workers team at the OECD provided some insight into the work of the OECD into<br />

<strong>ageing</strong>. A study is being carried out involving 21 OECD countries. It shows that while pension re<strong>for</strong>ms will<br />

influence early retirement, they are not the only factor. Older workers face barriers to employment which must<br />

also be dealt with. He emphasised the need <strong>for</strong> a comprehensive approach, tackling barriers to employment at<br />

macro- and micro-economic levels. Policies need to be put in place that encourage growth and ensure that the<br />

full potential of the work<strong>for</strong>ce is being used. Policy packages need to be tailored to individual countries, regions<br />

and people. The OECD recommends a lifecycle approach which concentrates on the two major issues of<br />

working conditions and lifelong <strong>learning</strong>. It warns against focusing on the age issue too much and recommends<br />

focusing on other factors affecting employability. Martin Kees also raised the issue of the side-effects of policies,<br />

e.g. employment protection. He also appealed to the audience to consider the issue from a more positive angle:<br />

we have population <strong>ageing</strong> because we are all living longer!<br />

20 April 2005 Thematic Review Seminar <strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong><br />

12


SUMMARY<br />

In the ensuing discussion, the question of productivity and age was discussed at some length. In the view of<br />

some experts, much of the research on age and productivity is flawed, but it was generally agreed that<br />

productivity does appear to decline with age in some areas of activity and that some sectors of the economy are<br />

more affected by this than others. Job mobility could be the solution.<br />

The issue of ‘comprehensive re<strong>for</strong>ms’ was also discussed. The view was expressed that re<strong>for</strong>ms happen<br />

incrementally and not all at once and it can be, there<strong>for</strong>e, a little misleading to talk about ‘comprehensive<br />

re<strong>for</strong>ms’. However, the important thing is that the re<strong>for</strong>ms happen in a logical order which takes account of other<br />

activities and policies that are being implemented. How different policies are combined in an overall package is<br />

an important issue (E.g. it is rather pointless to offer training to older workers while still encouraging early<br />

retirement.).<br />

The question was also raised of what to do with unemployed workers over 60 who had very few job prospects.<br />

In this context it was argued that programmes to encourage economic growth are required on the one hand and<br />

<strong>active</strong> labour market measures on the other, to re-integrate people of all ages, and it would set a negative<br />

precedent to 'give up on people' on account of their age.<br />

A further issue <strong>for</strong> debate was the question of age discrimination legislation was also discussed, and the UNICE<br />

representative argued that, while it is discriminating to stipulate a specific age in a job advertisement, employers<br />

should have the right to ask <strong>for</strong> the kind of person and levels of experience they need. Legislation will not<br />

change this situation.<br />

The question was also posed of what we can learn from the USA which is often presented as a good practice<br />

example when it comes to <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong> or at least to high employment rates among older workers. Martin Kees<br />

from the OECD mentioned the flexible retirement system and the positive incentives to keep working in the US<br />

system – although it is also the case that many older people can quite simply not af<strong>for</strong>d to stop working. There is<br />

also a cultural difference between the continental European outlook on retirement and the Anglo-Saxon<br />

approach. The USA, <strong>for</strong> example, never promoted a culture of early retirement and people want to and expect to<br />

retire much later in the USA than in Europe.<br />

8. Conclusions<br />

Antonis Kastrissianakis from the European Commission closed the meeting. He concluded that the importance<br />

of the issue of <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong> based on a life cycle perspective is reflected in the integrated guidelines of the<br />

renewed Lisbon Strategy. The EU risks losing 20 million jobs on account of demographic change and this will<br />

pose a major problem to the European economy. The Lisbon target is to reach an employment rate of 50 per<br />

cent <strong>for</strong> older workers (by 2010) which means, in turn, creating 7 million jobs <strong>for</strong> older people. A further aim is to<br />

raise the average age of exit from the labour market by five years. This needs a comprehensive strategy<br />

including making work pay, better working conditions, updating skills and making better use of <strong>active</strong> labour<br />

market policy measures <strong>for</strong> older workers.<br />

20 April 2005 Thematic Review Seminar <strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>active</strong> <strong>ageing</strong><br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!