26.10.2014 Views

Sensors for ecology - Outil de Suivi des Contrats

Sensors for ecology - Outil de Suivi des Contrats

Sensors for ecology - Outil de Suivi des Contrats

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Présentation <strong>de</strong> l’éditeur<br />

Ecological sciences <strong>de</strong>al with the way organisms interact<br />

with one another and their environment. Using sensors<br />

to measure various physical and biological characteristics<br />

has been a common activity since long ago. However<br />

the advent of more accurate technologies and increasing<br />

computing capacities <strong>de</strong>mand a better combination<br />

of in<strong>for</strong>mation collected by sensors on multiple spatial,<br />

temporal and biological scales.<br />

This book provi<strong>de</strong>s an overview of current sensors <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>ecology</strong> and makes a strong case <strong>for</strong> <strong>de</strong>ploying integrated<br />

sensor plat<strong>for</strong>ms. By covering technological challenges as<br />

well as the variety of practical ecological applications, this text is meant to be<br />

an invaluable resource <strong>for</strong> stu<strong>de</strong>nts, researchers and engineers in ecological<br />

sciences.<br />

This book benefited from the Centre National <strong>de</strong> la Recherche Scientifique<br />

(CNRS) funds, and inclu<strong>de</strong>s 16 contributions by leading experts in french<br />

laboratories.<br />

Key features<br />

• An overview of sensors in the field of animal behaviour and physiology,<br />

biodiversity and ecosystem.<br />

• Several case studies of integrated sensor plat<strong>for</strong>ms in terrestrial and aquatic<br />

environments <strong>for</strong> observational and experimental research.<br />

• Presentation of new applications and challenges in relation with remote<br />

sensing, acoustic sensors, animal-borne sensors, and chemical sensors.


<strong>Sensors</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>ecology</strong><br />

Towards integrated knowledge of ecosystems


Jean-François Le Galliard,<br />

Jean-Marc Guarini, Françoise Gaill<br />

<strong>Sensors</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>ecology</strong><br />

Towards integrated knowledge<br />

of ecosystems<br />

Centre National <strong>de</strong> la recherche scientifique (CNRS)<br />

Institut Écologie et Environnement (INEE)<br />

www.cnrs.fr


Photographie <strong>de</strong> couverture / Cover Picture<br />

© CNRS Photothèque – AMICE Erwan<br />

UMR6539 – Laboratoire <strong>de</strong>s sciences <strong>de</strong> l’environnement marin – LEMAR – PLOUZANE<br />

“A diver inspects a queen conch Strombus gigas during a scientific expedition<br />

in Mexico. The queen conch is equipped with acoustic sensors, here nearby a receptor,<br />

in or<strong>de</strong>r to collect in<strong>for</strong>mation on its behaviour and physiology in nature.”<br />

© CNRS, Paris, 2012<br />

ISBN : 978-2-9541683-0-2


Contents<br />

Foreword................................................................................................ 11<br />

I<br />

Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Chapter 1 :<br />

Bio-logging: recording the ecophysiology and behaviour of animals<br />

moving freely in their environment<br />

Yan Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt, Akiko Kato, David Grémillet, Francis Crenner.... 17<br />

Chapter 2 :<br />

Animal-borne sensors to study the <strong>de</strong>mography and behaviour<br />

of small species<br />

Olivier Guillaume, Aurélie Coulon, Jean-François Le Galliard,<br />

and Jean Clobert................................................................................... 43<br />

Chapter 3 :<br />

Passive hydro-acoustics <strong>for</strong> cetacean census and localisation<br />

Flore Samaran, Nadège Gandilhon, Rocio Prieto Gonzalez, Fe<strong>de</strong>rica<br />

Pace, Amy Kennedy, and Olivier Adam............................................... 63<br />

Chapter 4 :<br />

Bioacoustics approaches to locate and i<strong>de</strong>ntify animals in terrestrial<br />

environments<br />

Chloé Huetz, Thierry Aubin................................................................. 83


8 Contents<br />

II<br />

Biodiversity<br />

Chapter 1 :<br />

Global estimation of animal diversity using automatic acoustic<br />

sensors<br />

Jérôme Sueur, Amandine Gasc, Philippe Grandcolas, Sandrine Pavoine. 99<br />

Chapter 2 :<br />

Assessing the spatial and temporal distributions of zooplankton<br />

and marine particles using the Un<strong>de</strong>rwater Vision Profiler<br />

Lars Stemmann, Marc Picheral, Lionel Guidi, Fabien Lombard,<br />

Franck Prejger, Hervé Claustre, Gabriel Gorsky..................................... 119<br />

Chapter 3 :<br />

Assessment of three genetic methods <strong>for</strong> a faster and reliable<br />

monitoring of harmful algal blooms<br />

Jahir Orozco-Holguin, Kerstin Töbe, Linda K. Medlin.......................... 139<br />

Chapter 4 :<br />

Automatic particle analysis as sensors <strong>for</strong> life history studies in<br />

experimental microcosms<br />

François Mallard, Vincent Le Bourlot, Thomas Tully............................ 163<br />

III<br />

Ecosystem properties<br />

Chapter 1 :<br />

In situ chemical sensors <strong>for</strong> benthic marine ecosystem studies<br />

Nadine Le Bris, Leonardo Contreira-Pereira, Mustafa Yücel................. 185<br />

Chapter 2 :<br />

Advances in marine benthic <strong>ecology</strong> using in situ chemical sensors<br />

Nadine Le Bris, Leonardo Contreira-Pereira, Mustafa Yücel................. 209<br />

Chapter 3 :<br />

Use of global satellite observations to collect in<strong>for</strong>mation in marine<br />

<strong>ecology</strong><br />

Séverine Alvain, Vincent Vantrepotte, Julia Uitz, Lucile Du<strong>for</strong>êt-<br />

Gaurier................................................................................................. 227


Contents 9<br />

Chapter 4 :<br />

Tracking canopy phenology and structure using ground-based<br />

remote sensed NDVI measurements<br />

Jean-Yves Pontailler, Kamel Soudani.................................................... 243<br />

IV<br />

Integrated studies<br />

Chapter 1 :<br />

Integrated observation system <strong>for</strong> pelagic ecosystems and<br />

biogeochemical cycles in the oceans<br />

Lars Stemmann, Hervé Claustre, Fabrizio D’Ortenzio.......................... 261<br />

Chapter 2 :<br />

Tropical rain <strong>for</strong>est environmental sensors at the Nouragues<br />

experimental station, French Guiana<br />

Jérôme Chave, Philippe Gaucher, Maël Dewynter.................................. 279<br />

Chapter 3 :<br />

Use of sensors in marine mesocosm experiments to study the effect<br />

of environmental changes on planktonic food webs<br />

Behzad Mostajir, Jean Nouguier, Emilie Le Floc’h, Sébastien Mas,<br />

Romain Pete, David Parin, Francesca Vidussi....................................... 305<br />

Synthesis and conclusion<br />

Jean-François Le Galliard, Jean-Marc Guarini and Françoise Gaill...... 331<br />

NB: When cited in the text, a chapter of this book is i<strong>de</strong>ntified according<br />

to the part it belongs to. For example, (III, 3) refers to the chapter<br />

3 by Alvain et al. in the third (III) part of this book about Ecosystem<br />

properties.


Foreword<br />

Altogether explorer, scientist, philosopher and one of the first world citizen,<br />

the German naturalist Alexan<strong>de</strong>r von Humboldt (1769-1859) is often<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>red as a foun<strong>de</strong>r of ecological sciences, though the word “<strong>ecology</strong>”<br />

was only coined several <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s later by another German scientist, Ernst<br />

Haeckel (1834-1919). Equipped with the best sensors (thermometers,<br />

barometers, and so on) and familiar with advanced metrology techniques<br />

of its time, von Humboldt pioneered the field of plant biogeography, a<br />

discipline at the meeting point between botany, geography, climatology<br />

and geology. Von Humboldt major conceptual and methodological contributions<br />

consisted in collecting physical and geological data along with<br />

plant distribution maps to <strong>de</strong>termine the physical and historical conditions<br />

favouring specific plant assemblages all over the world. With this<br />

approach, he ventured into previously unsuspected complex interactions<br />

between plants and their physical surroundings. Two centuries later,<br />

researchers are still striving to un<strong>de</strong>rstand the ecological and evolutionary<br />

mechanisms that <strong>de</strong>termine the distribution of plant and animal species.<br />

In<strong>de</strong>ed, an accurate quantification of how organisms interact with each<br />

other and with their environment is at the heart of several grand challenges<br />

in mo<strong>de</strong>rn ecological sciences from the <strong>de</strong>scription of bio-geochemical<br />

balances to the prediction of ecosystem dynamics. However, contrary<br />

to von Humboldt and his followers, we can now explore thoroughly the<br />

natural world, thanks to major technological improvements in our ability<br />

to measure physical, chemical and biological quantities. <strong>Sensors</strong> are now<br />

part of the standard toolbox of most ecological studies, and play an important<br />

role in both exploratory studies of nature, experimental approaches,<br />

and the <strong>de</strong>velopment of predictive ecological mo<strong>de</strong>ls. With the advent<br />

of more advanced technologies and the strong opportunities offered by<br />

nowadays available computing capacities, we are in a better position to<br />

integrate ecological in<strong>for</strong>mation from sensors across multiple spatial, temporal<br />

and biological scales. This book, sponsored by the Centre National<br />

<strong>de</strong> la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) in France, presents an up-to-date<br />

overview of the use sensors <strong>for</strong> <strong>ecology</strong> by some leading CNRS laborato-


12 Foreword<br />

ries. The book covers some of the main technological challenges in our<br />

field from bio-loggers attached on animals to remote sensing imaging<br />

capacities installed on satellites, and provi<strong>de</strong>s many examples of practical<br />

applications chosen from ongoing CNRS programs. It is also tightly<br />

connected with the current frontiers in <strong>ecology</strong> and evolution throughout<br />

the world. We hope that the book will become an invaluable resource to<br />

stu<strong>de</strong>nts, researchers and engineers in ecological sciences.<br />

Few books have reviewed methods and issues in the field of sensors <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>ecology</strong>. The reason is easy to un<strong>de</strong>rstand: a great <strong>de</strong>al of techniques<br />

and sensor types do exist and are covered in specific reviews or journals.<br />

Keeping pace with the increasing number of sensors and technologies<br />

currently available is there<strong>for</strong>e a difficult task. Yet, this book provi<strong>de</strong>s<br />

in a synthetic way a balanced <strong>de</strong>scription of the new applications and<br />

challenges in ecological research that the use of remote, acoustic, animalborne,<br />

chemical and genosensors represents. Here, we adopted a broad<br />

view on sensors – usually <strong>de</strong>fined as a <strong>de</strong>vice that measures a physical<br />

quantity and converts it into a signal – to <strong>de</strong>scribe a quantity of tools<br />

including image and vi<strong>de</strong>o analyses, biodiversity and life history sensors,<br />

and other less traditional methods.<br />

Furthermore, this book contains technical <strong>de</strong>scriptions of some sensors<br />

even though it is not a handbook about sensor technologies. A technical<br />

treatment is crucial to un<strong>de</strong>rstand, <strong>de</strong>sign and integrate sensors <strong>for</strong><br />

the purpose of ecological research, but this issue is already addressed in<br />

many handbooks. Instead, it was <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>d to focus this presentation on<br />

relevant applications and practical problems faced by ecologists during<br />

their research programs.<br />

Lastly, the book differs from a traditional presentation based on a standard<br />

classification among sensor types and a discussion of the specific<br />

issues within each category of sensors (e.g. remote sensing versus chemical<br />

sensors). Ecological studies often need to integrate physical, chemical and<br />

biological data obtained with various types of sensors to get a comprehensive<br />

view of the state and dynamics of ecosystems. We there<strong>for</strong>e chose to<br />

make a strong case <strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>ployment of integrated, autonomous sensor<br />

plat<strong>for</strong>ms in the context of observational and experimental research infrastructures,<br />

and we present case studies where integrated data can in<strong>for</strong>m<br />

predictive mo<strong>de</strong>ls. The integration of various types of sensors <strong>for</strong> ecological<br />

studies poses a series of complex problems, from the engineering and<br />

autonomy of the plat<strong>for</strong>m to the access and use of data <strong>for</strong> mo<strong>de</strong>lling.<br />

These difficulties go far beyond the <strong>de</strong>sign of a single sensor and are often<br />

specific of the scale at which sensors should be <strong>de</strong>ployed.


Foreword 13<br />

The i<strong>de</strong>a of this project started un<strong>de</strong>r the patronage of the CNRS Institut<br />

Écologie et Environnement in 2010 with the aim to produce a state-ofthe-art<br />

review <strong>for</strong> sensors used in <strong>ecology</strong> in France, as well as to i<strong>de</strong>ntify<br />

strengths and weaknesses in this field <strong>for</strong> the future. Un<strong>de</strong>r the supervision<br />

of Jean-Marc Guarini and Karine Heerah, a workshop was organised at the<br />

University Pierre and Marie Curie in Paris in January 2011. Twenty four<br />

contributions were ma<strong>de</strong> and the workshop’s program addressed remote<br />

sensing techniques, the use of sensors <strong>for</strong> in situ studies, and the use of<br />

sensors <strong>for</strong> experimental studies. From these contributions and the discussions<br />

that followed, a few were selected to be published in the four<br />

sections of this book. The first section <strong>de</strong>als with animal behaviour and<br />

physiology, a very active field of research that raises both strong technical<br />

constraints and ethical issues. In a second section, we discuss the use of<br />

sensors in intra-specific and inter-specific biodiversity studies, and provi<strong>de</strong><br />

key examples ranging from the use of acoustic sensors or genetic methods<br />

to image analysis. We then present a series of ecosystem studies relying<br />

on advanced remote sensing and chemical sensors; those studies focus<br />

on measuring feedbacks between organisms and their geo-chemical environment.<br />

Our last section groups three integrated ecological studies. Two<br />

discuss observation plat<strong>for</strong>ms of ecosystems and one <strong>de</strong>scribes an experimental<br />

marine <strong>ecology</strong> infrastructure. The latter <strong>de</strong>monstrates how sensors<br />

can be used to manipulate environmental conditions and study the<br />

effect of environmental changes on ecosystems. Each chapter was organised<br />

so that it reviews existing methods and sensors, and discusses current<br />

difficulties and requirements <strong>for</strong> future technological <strong>de</strong>velopment.<br />

We would like to thank the authors <strong>for</strong> their participation and their kind<br />

patience during the editorial process. Angeline Perrot assisted us during<br />

the two last months of this project and was extremely efficient at organising<br />

reviews, editing all text and making the iconography tidy from an<br />

heterogeneous pool of figures and photographs. The editors would like to<br />

thank the CNRS and the Institut Écologie et Environnement (INEE) <strong>for</strong><br />

their financial support, as well as the University Pierre and Marie Curie<br />

<strong>for</strong> hosting the workshop. Jean-François Le Galliard acknowledges the support<br />

of the TGIR Ecotrons program and from the UMS 3194 CEREEP-<br />

Ecotron IleDeFrance as well as the financial support from ANR Equipex<br />

PLANAQUA coordinated by École normale superieure and CNRS (contract<br />

ANR-10-EQPX-13).<br />

Jean-François Le Galliard, Jean-Marc Guarini and Françoise Gaill<br />

January 16, 2012<br />

Paris, France


I<br />

EcoPHySIology<br />

AND ANIMAL bEHAVIoUR


Chapter 1<br />

Bio-logging: recording<br />

the ecophysiology and behaviour<br />

of animals moving freely in their<br />

environment<br />

Yan Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt, Akiko Kato, David Grémillet, Francis Crenner<br />

1. Setting the scene<br />

1.1 Sensing with bio-loggers<br />

Bio-logging refers to the fastening of autonomous <strong>de</strong>vices onto (mainly)<br />

free-ranging animals to collect physical and biological in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

(Naito, 2004; 2010; Cooke et al., 2004; Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt et al., 2005; see<br />

also Costa, 1988, although the term bio-logging was not used in these<br />

times). It should be noted here that bio-logging is sometimes referred to<br />

as biologging. However, as Naito (2010) pointed out, the latter term is<br />

misleading as it is used in molecular biology. As such bio-logging differs<br />

from telemetry in the sense that data are stored locally in the memory<br />

of the <strong>de</strong>vices and not transferred via radio waves or other transmitting<br />

means. This move from biotelemetry to bio-logging was done in or<strong>de</strong>r<br />

to address practical difficulties related to data transmission. Thus, this<br />

comes, as no surprise that bio-logging was firstly used in ecological and<br />

physiological studies to investigate marine, far-ranging, diving species, as<br />

water represents a barrier to radio signals. Bio-logging studies were initially<br />

conducted on species with a body mass large enough to accommodate the<br />

large size of the very first loggers: seals and whales. As miniaturisation<br />

progressed, smaller species of seals and seabirds became target species <strong>for</strong><br />

bio-logging approaches. Among seabirds, penguins (Sphenscidae) represent<br />

an intensively studied family because of their adaptation to aquatic life


18 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

and their consequently <strong>de</strong>nser, larger and more robust body. Nowadays,<br />

bio-logging can be applied onto an impressive range of species, terrestrial<br />

or aquatic, whether these are mammals, birds or reptiles (see I, 2).<br />

Bio-logging <strong>de</strong>velopments are one step away from moving into the insect<br />

realm as radio-telemetry is already available to study terrestrial and flying<br />

insects (Vinatier et al., 2010; Wikelski et al., 2006).<br />

Immediate consequences of local storage are the necessity to retrieve the<br />

<strong>de</strong>vice to access the data and <strong>de</strong>velop appropriate sensors to gather data<br />

about physical and biological in<strong>for</strong>mation on relevant time scales. It there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

clearly appears that bio-logging primarily refers to a methodological<br />

approach and has generated research to improve existing technologies. Yet,<br />

bio-logging is more than a mere catalogue of tools and techniques. The<br />

possibility to obtain an uninterrupted flow of in<strong>for</strong>mation pertaining to<br />

both the activity and physiology of animal and its immediate, physical<br />

surroundings revolutionised the way we consi<strong>de</strong>r several fields in biology.<br />

We could draw a parallel with the field of genetics and how it evolved from<br />

Gregor Men<strong>de</strong>l crossing variety of peas to the advanced technologies of<br />

molecular sequencing. Similarly, the ecologist with its notebook possesses<br />

now a suite of approaches to examine animals living freely in their environment.<br />

In this context, bio-logging applications ranges from physiological<br />

investigations to the comprehension of the functioning of ecosystems,<br />

by relating a change in physical parameters of the environment to a change<br />

in the behaviour of both a predator and its prey, at the same spatial and<br />

temporal scales (Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt et al., 2009a).<br />

1.2. Bio-logging in the scientific community<br />

The word bio-logging was coined at the occasion of the first symposium<br />

about the topic held in 2003 in Tokyo, Japan. Over the past <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>, three<br />

additional symposia took place: Saint Andrews (Scotland) in 2005, Pacific<br />

Grove (USA) in 2008, and Hobart (Tasmania) in 2011. The next bio-logging<br />

symposium will be organized in France and is tentatively scheduled<br />

<strong>for</strong> Strasbourg in September 2014. The number of manufacturers has<br />

steadily increased since the inception of Wildlife Computers (USA) in<br />

1986, the first – to the best of our knowledge – bio-logging company ever.<br />

Nowadays, the core of the bio-logging production is concentrated in the<br />

North America and Japan (Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt et al., 2009b), but emerging<br />

companies in the UK (CTL), Iceland (Star-Oddi) or Italy (Technosmart)<br />

are gaining worldwi<strong>de</strong> momentum (Table 1). A non-negligible proportion<br />

(a rough estimate of 20%) of bio-logging <strong>de</strong>vices is still produced in<br />

research institutions, the so-called custom-ma<strong>de</strong> bio-loggers, and is thus<br />

accessible only through collaborations between researchers. In Europe,<br />

<strong>for</strong> example, research-driven <strong>de</strong>velopments are found in the Sea Mammal


Part I – Chapter 1 19<br />

Table 1: A non exhaustive list of the most-used bio-loggers together<br />

with their weights and the sensors they inclu<strong>de</strong>, as well as the name<br />

of the manufacturers.<br />

Mo<strong>de</strong>l Weight (g) <strong>Sensors</strong> Manufacturers<br />

Mk 15 2.5 Light, wet or dry status British Antarctic Survey, UK<br />

Cefas G5 2.7 Depth, temperature Cefas technology Ltd, UK<br />

DST bird 1.7 Temperature, light<br />

Star-Oddi, Iceland<br />

DST magnetic 19 Depth, temperature, magnetometer, tilt<br />

ORI400-D3GT 9 Depth, temperature, acceleration<br />

W1000-3MPD3GT 130 Depth, temperature, speed, acceleration, magnetometer<br />

Little Leonardo, Japan<br />

W400-ECG 57 ECG<br />

DSL400-VDT II 82 Depth, temperature, image<br />

GiPSy I 22 GPS TechnoSmart, Italy<br />

CatTraQ 22 GPS Mr. Lee, USA<br />

Mk9 30 Depth, temperature, light, acceleration, magnetometer<br />

Wildlife Computers, USA<br />

SPLASH10-F-400 225 Depth, temperature, light, GPS, Argos (data transmission)<br />

DTAG 300 Depth, audio, pitch, roll, heading<br />

SRDL tag 370 Depth, temperature, speed, Argos (data transmission)<br />

CTD tag 545 Depth, temperature, conductivity<br />

GPS Phone tag 370 Depth, temperature, GPS, GMS (data transmission)<br />

Daily Diary 42<br />

Depth, temperature, light, speed, acceleration,<br />

magnetometer<br />

Woods Hole Oceangraphic<br />

Institution, USA<br />

Sea Mammal Research Unit,<br />

UK<br />

Swansea University, UK


20 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Research Unit of the University of St. Andrews, which organized the 2nd<br />

bio-logging symposium. In France, the only openly <strong>de</strong>clared bio-logging<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment team is found at the Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien<br />

in Strasbourg. The next big step <strong>for</strong> the bio-logging community will be<br />

to <strong>for</strong>m a society so as to reach an official status and help structuring the<br />

community. Bio-logging is especially expected to play an important role<br />

in the <strong>for</strong>thcoming <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> regarding conservation issues and will represent<br />

a crucial tool to assess large vertebrate species distribution and links<br />

between the physical environment and the biological response of animals<br />

to its variation (see Cooke, 2008).<br />

2. Overview of bio-logging applications<br />

2.1. Reconstructing the movement and feeding behaviour<br />

The ancestors of all bio-loggers are probably time-<strong>de</strong>pth-recor<strong>de</strong>rs, commonly<br />

referred to as TDR in several instances. These <strong>de</strong>vices record<br />

hydrostatic pressure according to time so as to reconstruct diving activity<br />

of sea animals. Oddly, the very first incarnation of a TDR, which was<br />

attached to a freely-diving Wed<strong>de</strong>ll seal Leptonychotes wed<strong>de</strong>lli, consisted<br />

in coupling a kitchen timer with a pressure transducer (Kooyman, 1965;<br />

1966). Subsequent <strong>de</strong>vices also functioned on a mechanical basis, such as<br />

miniature pencils that were animated by pressure changes and drew the<br />

profiles of dives onto a miniature paper (e.g. Naito et al., 1990). The emergence<br />

of solid-state memories put an end to this era of clever handcrafting.<br />

Nowadays, TDR can weigh as less as 2.7g and are able to capture <strong>de</strong>pth<br />

and temperature data every second <strong>for</strong> around 10 days. When associated<br />

with GPS, they provi<strong>de</strong> localisation onto both the horizontal and vertical<br />

dimensions, on a large range of species.<br />

Originally, TDR <strong>de</strong>livered only a 2D view of the diving activity (<strong>de</strong>pth<br />

according to time) but progresses in behaviour reconstruction came from<br />

the utilisation of accelerometers. Accelerometers record gravity-related<br />

and dynamic acceleration signals and can be used to provi<strong>de</strong> specific<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation about the movements of the body, such as walking gait (e.g.<br />

Halsey et al., 2008) or head-jerking (e.g. Viviant et al., 2010). The potential<br />

of accelerometers to reconstruct time budget activity was <strong>de</strong>monstrated<br />

in several instances (e.g. Yoda et al., 1999; Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt et al.,<br />

2004a; Watanabe et al., 2005). The addition of gyroscopes and magnetometers<br />

makes it possible to reconstruct the precise path of animals in<br />

the three dimensions. This approach, called “<strong>de</strong>ad reckoning” (Wilson<br />

et al., 1991), is very prone to making substantial errors. For example, a<br />

Wed<strong>de</strong>ll seal diving <strong>for</strong> ca. 17mn would accumulate an error in its posi-


Part I – Chapter 1 21<br />

tion calculated via <strong>de</strong>ad reckoning of nearly 100m over this period (see<br />

figure 5a in Mitani et al., 2003). While methods exist to take this error<br />

into account (Mitani et al., 2003), <strong>de</strong>ad reckoning is yet to be implemented<br />

at time scales longer than a few days. Anyway, the precision of<br />

tracking techniques thanks to GPS <strong>de</strong>velopment makes it unlikely that<br />

<strong>de</strong>ad reckoning will become a major approach. Small body movements,<br />

such as limb movements (Wilson and Liebsch, 2003), can also be finely<br />

reconstructed using Hall sensors, i.e. sensors measuring the intensity of<br />

the magnetic field. In this case, a magnet placed on one mandibular plate<br />

facing a Hall sensor glued onto the other mandibular plate (figure 1)<br />

allows researchers to <strong>de</strong>termine when a prey has been swallowed and,<br />

following a proper calibration, the size and type of prey (Wilson et al.,<br />

2002; Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt et al., 2004b).<br />

Figure 1: Schematic representation of the jaw movement recor<strong>de</strong>r on a gentoo<br />

penguin Pygoscelis papua (top) and a young wild boar Sus scrofa (bottom). A magnet<br />

and a Hall sensor, sensitive to the strength of the magnetic field are placed on the<br />

two mandibles, facing each other. When the mouth opens the Hall sensor senses<br />

a reduction in the intensity of the magnetic field and sends this in<strong>for</strong>mation via a<br />

cable to the bio-logger attached on the body.<br />

Finally, in the context of assessing animal movements on a world-wi<strong>de</strong><br />

scale, the two major <strong>de</strong>velopments of the recent <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s feature the


22 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

advent of GLS (global location sensors) and of GPS (global positioning<br />

system). Global location sensors are miniaturised units that store light<br />

measurements at regular intervals, from which position can be estimated<br />

(using day length and noon time). Initially <strong>de</strong>scribed by Wilson et al.<br />

(1992a), this method revolutionised migration studies because <strong>de</strong>vices are<br />

particularly small (around 1g), cheap, and are able to record data up to<br />

several years. They can there<strong>for</strong>e be <strong>de</strong>ployed year-round on a wi<strong>de</strong> range<br />

of individuals and species (Fort et al., in press). Miniaturised GPS (the<br />

smallest ones currently weigh 5g or less) usually have shorter recording<br />

times yet far higher spatial resolution than GLS (a few meters versus a few<br />

tens of km). Their generalised use triggered a quantum leap in the spatial<br />

<strong>ecology</strong> of free-ranging animals (Ryan et al., 2004)<br />

2.2. Reconstructing the internal temperature and heat flux<br />

Animal-borne bio-loggers also benefited physiological studies as these<br />

bio-loggers allowed researchers to investigate internal adjustments to the<br />

constraints of, <strong>for</strong> example, experiencing extremely low temperatures<br />

(Gilbert et al., 2008; Eichhorn et al., 2011). These feats cannot be realized<br />

in the confines of a laboratory. Reduced core temperature in the<br />

body of <strong>de</strong>ep divers like the king penguins Aptenodytes patagonicus shed<br />

a new light on the physiological mechanisms involved in energy savings<br />

at great <strong>de</strong>pths (e.g. Handrich et al., 1997). In parallel to the externallyattached<br />

bio-loggers that recor<strong>de</strong>d mandibular activity (see above), measurements<br />

of temperature in the stomach (Wilson et al., 1992b; Grémillet<br />

and Plos, 1994) or the oesophagus of endotherms (Ancel et al., 1997;<br />

Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt et al., 2001) also permitted to explore when these animals<br />

fed onto their exothermic prey as their swallowing induced a drop in the<br />

temperature (see figure 2 and additional discussions around the principle<br />

and the limitations of this method in Hedd et al., 1995; Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt<br />

et al., 2006a). Heat flux measurement bio-loggers may also be used to<br />

study homeothermy in animals swimming in cold waters (e.g. Willis and<br />

Horning, 2005).<br />

2.3. Reconstructing the heart ef<strong>for</strong>t: ECG vs. heart rate<br />

One challenge in ecophysiology is to <strong>de</strong>termine energy expenditures of<br />

free-ranging animals. Field methods based on doubly-labelled water exist<br />

but these are long-term methods that integrate the energy expen<strong>de</strong>d over a<br />

period of few days (Speakman, 1997). Further to the point, these methods<br />

require multiple capture and handling, which are not always easy to implement<br />

in the field, especially <strong>for</strong> shy and sensitive species. Cormorants, <strong>for</strong><br />

example, respond to handling with intense overheating. Last but not least,


Part I – Chapter 1 23<br />

Figure 2: Two temperature signals (°C) recor<strong>de</strong>d by sensors placed in the upper<br />

part of the oesophagous (top) and in the stomach (bottom) of an Adélie penguin<br />

Pygoscelis a<strong>de</strong>liae fed with cold food items. Each ingestion is visualised as a sud<strong>de</strong>n<br />

drop in the temperature, followed by a slow recovery.<br />

the doubly-labelled water method is expensive and implies a laboratory<br />

specifically equipped with isotope analysis facilities. In contrast, the measurement<br />

of heart rate can give an i<strong>de</strong>a of the energy expen<strong>de</strong>d, as heart<br />

rates are linked with metabolic rates (Nolet et al., 1992; Green et al., 2001;<br />

Weimerskirch et al., 2002). Although the shape of the relationship is often<br />

unclear (Froget et al., 2002; Ward et al., 2002; McPhee et al., 2003), measuring<br />

heart rate still enables the estimation of the ef<strong>for</strong>t allocated to basal<br />

versus non-basal (e.g. locomotor) activities.<br />

Among the bio-logging approaches <strong>for</strong> measuring heart rate, two techniques<br />

have emerged: i) heart rate recor<strong>de</strong>rs (HRR) that <strong>de</strong>tect the heart<br />

beat and store in their memory the interval between each heartbeat or<br />

the number of heart beats per certain time period; ii) electrocardiogram<br />

recor<strong>de</strong>rs (ECGR) that monitor and store the complete electric signals<br />

allowing to access the complete PQRS profile of a heartbeat. both systems<br />

measure the electrical activity of the heart transmitted via 2 or 3<br />

electro<strong>de</strong>s placed in different parts of an animal’s body. HRR have an<br />

exten<strong>de</strong>d autonomy since they only count intervals (Grémillet et al.,<br />

2005) but are prone to error because the ability to distinguish heartbeats<br />

from electric noise due to muscular activity <strong>de</strong>pends solely on an onboard<br />

algorithm. In contrast, ECGR requires a processing of the signal<br />

but this ensures that only heartbeats are counted (Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt et al.,<br />

2006b; 2009c). However, commercially available ECGR have limited<br />

autonomy.


24 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Figure 3: Recordings of heart rate on a captive mandrill Mandrillus sphinx.<br />

A. Photograph of the collar where <strong>de</strong>vices are attached and the electro<strong>de</strong>s<br />

protruding from it. B. Collar mounted on the mandrill with the electro<strong>de</strong>s plugged<br />

on the skin and secured by bolts. C. A comparison of the heart rate recor<strong>de</strong>d by two<br />

different <strong>de</strong>vices: a heart rate counter (Polar Watch, blue) and an electrocardiogram<br />

(ECG recor<strong>de</strong>r, red). The latter allows the user to visualize each heart beat as a<br />

PQRS complex and is thus much more reliable than heart rate directly given by the<br />

counter (calculated via an internal algorythm to which the user generally cannot<br />

access). The heart rate given by the counter shows large variation that are absent on<br />

the signals <strong>de</strong>rived from the ECG. © Jacques-Olivier Fortrat.<br />

The comparison of the heart rate signals of a sleeping mandrill Mandrillus<br />

sphinx directly <strong>de</strong>rived from a commercially-available heart rate monitor<br />

(© Polar Electro, France) and the one calculated from an ECGR (Little<br />

Leonardo, Japan) illustrates well the risk of applying tools that are <strong>de</strong>veloped<br />

<strong>for</strong> a specific use (here, the Polar Watch is inten<strong>de</strong>d <strong>for</strong> measuring<br />

heart rate during human exercise) onto an animal mo<strong>de</strong>l without prior


Part I – Chapter 1 25<br />

calibration work (figure 3). The need to reduce the risk of storing electromyograms<br />

generally leads researchers to implant the HRR in the body,<br />

while ECGR can either be implanted or externally attached. Implantation<br />

is not trivial as it involves anaesthesia and surgery, with all the associated<br />

risks, and is not always easy to per<strong>for</strong>m in the field (see Green et al., 2004;<br />

Beaulieu et al., 2010).<br />

2.4. Viewing the environment: image data logger<br />

Data contained in bio-loggers are used to reconstruct the activity and, in<br />

some cases, the environment in which the animals move. But the dream<br />

of all users is to be able to visualise directly what the animals are seeing.<br />

Images, if they do not give access to physiological in<strong>for</strong>mation per se, are a<br />

smart and in<strong>for</strong>mative way of studying behaviour. Images are also attractive<br />

to a large audience as they do not always require specific knowledge to<br />

be interpreted. As communication towards the public becomes paramount<br />

to Science, this is a non negligible asset <strong>for</strong> bio-logging approaches that<br />

use digital-still picture recor<strong>de</strong>rs or even vi<strong>de</strong>o recor<strong>de</strong>rs. The National<br />

Geographic Crittercam project was a pioneer in merging the scientific<br />

community with common people. However, their usefulness to answer<br />

scientific questions was often questioned. Digital-still cameras take images<br />

following a <strong>de</strong>finite sampling interval which is not always a<strong>de</strong>quate <strong>for</strong><br />

short time events like prey capture.<br />

Yet, these techniques can provi<strong>de</strong> unravelled insights into prey i<strong>de</strong>ntification<br />

(figure 4, see also Davis et al., 1999; Watanabe et al., 2006), prey<br />

<strong>de</strong>nsity (Watanabe et al., 2003), group behaviour (Takahashi et al., 2004a;<br />

Rutz et al., 2007) or the biomechanics of flight (Gillies et al., 2011). Vi<strong>de</strong>o<br />

recording systems have limited autonomy and are still rather bulky to<br />

be used without the risk of impairing the per<strong>for</strong>mances and health of<br />

some animal mo<strong>de</strong>ls (see the bulkiness of a vi<strong>de</strong>o recor<strong>de</strong>r mounted on<br />

an emperor penguin in the figure 1 from Ponganis et al., 2000). Recent<br />

advances in miniaturisation allowed <strong>for</strong> these <strong>de</strong>vices to be placed on the<br />

head of a flying seabird (Sakamoto et al., 2009). In an applied context, it<br />

has been recently proposed to use newly-<strong>de</strong>veloped, highly miniaturised<br />

digital-still picture recor<strong>de</strong>rs mounted on seabirds to monitor pirates fishing<br />

boat (Grémillet et al., 2010).<br />

2.5. Reconstructing the environment: animals as bio-plat<strong>for</strong>ms<br />

The pioneers of bio-logging soon realised that this technology not only<br />

allowed the study of animals in their natural surroundings, but also to<br />

access their biotic and abiotic environment. Especially in the oceans,<br />

where sampling through the water column is impossible from satellites


26 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

and expensive from research vessels, this approach led to remarkable<br />

advances. As soon as time-<strong>de</strong>pth-recor<strong>de</strong>rs were coupled with positioning<br />

<strong>de</strong>vices and temperature sensors, the thermal structure of water masses<br />

could be assessed. This was first conducted in Antarctica by Wilson et al.<br />

(1994), which used penguins equipped with data loggers to map thermal<br />

gradients across the 100m of the Maxwell Bay. Not only did they assess<br />

this abiotic parameter, but they also cross-checked this in<strong>for</strong>mation with<br />

an estimation of krill biomass in this water mass, which was based upon<br />

the predatory per<strong>for</strong>mance of the birds. This approach was revolutionary.<br />

Yet, temperature measurements were too coarse to be a<strong>de</strong>quate <strong>for</strong> proper<br />

oceanography work. It is only a <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> later that seabirds were equipped<br />

with loggers measuring ocean temperature to 0.005K and <strong>de</strong>pth to 0.06m,<br />

values accurate enough to track the vertical movements of the thermocline<br />

off Scotland in the North Sea (Daunt et al., 2003). However, this<br />

approach was then only used to investigate areas that had been already<br />

studied, and had been sampled using conventional, ship-based surveys.<br />

Figure 4: Image data loggers. A. A digitial-still-picture logger (Little Leonardo, Japan)<br />

mounted on a great cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo in Greenland (left, © David Grémillet)<br />

together with a view of the logger itself (B) and four examples of pictures taken by<br />

the logger (C). The examples show fish prey caught in the beak of the cormorant.


Part I – Chapter 1 27<br />

The next step consisted in using free-ranging marine animals fitted<br />

with bio-loggers to sample unknown areas. For instance, Charrassin et<br />

al. (2002) used temperature data collected by diving king penguins to<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntify a previously-unknown water mass off Kerguelen in the Southern<br />

Ocean. However, operational oceanography requires real-time assessments<br />

of biotic and abiotic parameters, <strong>for</strong> instance to parameterise mo<strong>de</strong>ls of<br />

ocean circulation and climatic processes (IV, 1). This was not possible<br />

using ancient archival tags fitted to marine predators, since those had<br />

to be recovered to download the data, sometimes weeks or months after<br />

the actual measurement. Such problem was solved by the use of a system<br />

integrating bio-physical sensors of the environment (e.g. water colour,<br />

temperature, salinity) and sensors of the animal’s movements (3D acceleration,<br />

<strong>de</strong>pth and speed) with the Argos positioning and transmission<br />

system. Such tools are large, require substantial battery power, and can<br />

only be <strong>de</strong>ployed on large marine mammals <strong>for</strong> the time being, in particular<br />

elephant seals (Mirounga leonina). However, they allowed a major step<br />

<strong>for</strong>ward because elephant seals cruise the Southern Ocean in areas that<br />

are beyond the reach of satellite or vessel-based oceanography, especially<br />

in the marginal ice zone off Antarctica and at <strong>de</strong>pths of more than 1000m<br />

(Charrassin et al., 2008). From these areas, <strong>de</strong>vices fitted to these large,<br />

record-breaking divers can send new data which are now being routinely<br />

integrated into ocean physics mo<strong>de</strong>ls (Roquet et al., 2011).<br />

2.6. Multi-in<strong>for</strong>mation sensors: the special case of accelerometry<br />

A single parameter may not always be sufficient to address a scientific<br />

question, such as in the case of the <strong>de</strong>ad reckoning technique that we<br />

mentioned earlier (section 2.1). However, the use of multiple sensors is not<br />

always possible since it generally leads to an increase in the bulkiness of<br />

the <strong>de</strong>vices. Fortunately, accelerometry can be used to <strong>de</strong>rive more in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

than only the posture or the activity of animals. For example,<br />

with sensitive accelerometers, it is possible to <strong>de</strong>tect the faint signal of<br />

the heart rate in the movements of the cloacae of a bird and thus address<br />

physiological questions without the need <strong>for</strong> electro<strong>de</strong>s and/or implanted<br />

materials (Wilson et al., 2004). In addition, since a rough 70% estimate of<br />

the energy is expen<strong>de</strong>d through movements, overall dynamic body acceleration<br />

(ODBA) or partial dynamic body acceleration (PDBA), <strong>de</strong>rived<br />

from 3-axes or 2-axes accelerometers, respectively, was proposed as an<br />

in<strong>de</strong>x of energy expenditures (Wilson et al., 2006). ODBA and PDBA are<br />

in<strong>de</strong>ed significantly related to oxygen consumption in a variety of species,<br />

and both offer a good proxy of metabolic activity when combined with<br />

heart rate loggers (Halsey et al., 2008). Apart from accessing physiological<br />

parameters, these sensors can also be used to infer prey availability in the


28 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

environment. Changes in wing beat frequency and amplitu<strong>de</strong> are increasingly<br />

used to infer prey encounter in birds (Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt et al., 2006b),<br />

while <strong>de</strong>tection of head jerking movement are related to prey capture in<br />

marine mammals (Suzuki et al., 2009; Viviant et al., 2010).<br />

3. The road to bio-logging is paved with good intentions but…<br />

3.1. The standard bio-logging tra<strong>de</strong>-off<br />

Increasing the life-time of a bio-logger while keeping the same level of per<strong>for</strong>mances<br />

leads to the following paradox. On the one hand, the amount<br />

of in<strong>for</strong>mation stored is increased, and consequently the memory capacity<br />

has to increase too; on the other hand, the energy required to power<br />

the electronic circuit is increased, and so should be the battery size and<br />

weight in or<strong>de</strong>r to address this extra <strong>de</strong>mand. Based on the power consumption<br />

of a unit, it is possible to adapt batteries of different capacities<br />

to the <strong>de</strong>vices in or<strong>de</strong>r to adjust the working-time to the specific needs of a<br />

study. However, a longer working-time means larger and heavier batteries<br />

and bio-loggers, which may have an impact on the health of the species<br />

targeted or even become inappropriate (I, 2). This balance between small<br />

units with a lesser impact on the animal but reduced life time, and larger<br />

<strong>de</strong>vices with enhanced functionalities but restrictions on their applicability,<br />

is a major problem seriously <strong>de</strong>alt with by the bio-logging community<br />

i) <strong>for</strong> ethical reasons, and ii) to ensure that the data collected are reliable<br />

and are as close to the norm as possible (Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt et al., 2007).<br />

Regarding the impact of bio-logger, one must be aware that animals<br />

are generally shaped to optimise their movement through a medium.<br />

Swimmers are hydrodynamically featured, while flying animals present<br />

a specific adaptations to reduce their body mass. Thus, any externallyattached<br />

item may impair these features and lead to an increase in energy<br />

expen<strong>de</strong>d or a change in behaviour. In parallel, we already mentioned the<br />

negative consequences of implanting bio-loggers. Gui<strong>de</strong>lines are regularly<br />

produced to reduce the negative impact of bio-loggers (Casper, 2009). Biologgers,<br />

<strong>for</strong> example, should weigh less than 3% of the body mass of flying<br />

birds (Phillips et al., 2003) and less than 4-5% of the cross-section of the<br />

animal (Bannasch et al., 1994).<br />

Despite these gui<strong>de</strong>lines, we believe that the scientific community should<br />

move <strong>for</strong>ward to adopt a common co<strong>de</strong> of conduct. In<strong>de</strong>ed, the bio-logging<br />

community is very mindful about the need to reduce the impact of <strong>de</strong>vices,<br />

but newcomers may not always be aware of gui<strong>de</strong>lines specifically <strong>de</strong>signed<br />

<strong>for</strong> bio-logger <strong>de</strong>ployments (see above). In some instances, referees are not<br />

aware of them and accept papers that present ethical concerns or which


Part I – Chapter 1 29<br />

results are questionable due to the negative influence of a bulky <strong>de</strong>vice on<br />

the per<strong>for</strong>mances of the animals. Which institution could be in charge of<br />

ensuring that the appropriate gui<strong>de</strong>lines are followed? Some scientific journals<br />

have taken the lead in addressing this problem: <strong>for</strong> example, Animal<br />

Behaviour has very strict ethics regulations and ask the authors to address<br />

them be<strong>for</strong>e submission to peer review. The pressure to produce attractive<br />

results could, however, hin<strong>de</strong>r these ef<strong>for</strong>ts as it sometimes pushes<br />

researchers to emphasise outputs against rigor (see Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt et al.,<br />

2007). Conversely, en<strong>for</strong>cements of strict rules would also be <strong>de</strong>trimental<br />

without consi<strong>de</strong>ration of the benefits that overstepping them could bring<br />

in terms of new scientific results.<br />

3.2. Beyond sensors and <strong>de</strong>vices: homogenising analyses and sharing data<br />

Originally, each research group using bio-logging approaches <strong>de</strong>veloped<br />

its own method <strong>for</strong> analysing the data generated by bio-loggers. This led<br />

to the emergence of several analytical programming co<strong>de</strong>s that tackled the<br />

same question and there<strong>for</strong>e, to a divergence in the way bio-logging data<br />

were processed. For example, the bottom phase of a dive can be <strong>de</strong>fined in<br />

several different manners, leading to values that are not comparable from<br />

one study to another. The trend of diversifying the analytical methods is<br />

also enhanced by the presence of free software like R that allows users to<br />

create and disseminate their own co<strong>de</strong>s and thus their own <strong>de</strong>finitions<br />

<strong>for</strong> various parameters. In addition, the possibility offered by most biologgers<br />

of selecting the frequency at which the sampling is done also leads<br />

to diversification and ren<strong>de</strong>rs comparisons across data sets difficult. In<br />

physics, the “sampling theorem” states that the sampling frequency must<br />

be at least twice that of the signal’s highest component frequency (<strong>for</strong> a<br />

periodic signal) to avoid aliasing. Similarly, biologists suggested that the<br />

sampling interval should not represent more than 10% of the duration of<br />

the biological event that one wishes to measure (e.g. the lowest sampling<br />

frequency to measure a 600sec dive of a Wed<strong>de</strong>ll seal is 60sec, Boyd et<br />

al., 1993; Wilson et al., 1995). Not adopting a proper sampling protocol<br />

may lead to misinterpretation of the data and false biological conclusions<br />

(Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt and Wilson, 2004).<br />

Recently, the question has become a topic of reflexion on the occasion<br />

of various workshops. Can we (and should we) homogenise bio-logging<br />

data analysis? The difficulty to <strong>de</strong>fine the best practice in that case is<br />

twofold. First, <strong>de</strong>vices always evolve and become more efficient or collect<br />

new types of data. Consequently new analytical methods are required to<br />

handle these novelties. Secondly, the analytical method <strong>de</strong>pends upon the<br />

questions sought. In that sense, the currently best practice would not stay<br />

best <strong>for</strong> very long. Yet, we need to be able to compare datasets taken in


30 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

different locations, time and using different means, especially if we are to<br />

tackle large-scale questions. Methods like down-sampling, although necessarily<br />

frustrating, are keys to address such issues. We strongly advocate<br />

<strong>for</strong> working groups to explore paths <strong>for</strong> the homogenisation of analytical<br />

procedures within the framework of, <strong>for</strong> example, the Expert Group in<br />

Birds and Marine Mammals of the Scientific Committee <strong>for</strong> Antarctic<br />

Research (SCAR), or the newly-<strong>for</strong>med group of experts in accelerometry<br />

that was constituted on the last bio-logging symposium in Hobart.<br />

In addition to this issue, the use and share of data from bio-logging must<br />

be optimised. A whole book could be filled with the issue of data sharing,<br />

but only the surface will be scratched here. The million of data points<br />

that are now routinely recor<strong>de</strong>d by data loggers and the multiplicity of<br />

the research teams using such an approach make it necessary to centralise,<br />

archive, and ultimately share the data. Some researchers had been collecting<br />

bio-logging in<strong>for</strong>mation over several <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s and onto a large range<br />

of individuals and species. Upon retirement, their data would be lost if no<br />

system stores them. This is only recently that specific data repository have<br />

emerged. The ten<strong>de</strong>cy is now to multiply storage points, each scientific<br />

society recognizing the need <strong>for</strong> a database on their specific topic. For<br />

example, marine researchers studying the localisation and diving activity<br />

of polar top predators can store their data into the database managed by<br />

the SCAR (SCAR-marBIN and Antabif) that are themselves linked to<br />

marine databases at a larger scale (OBIS, SeaWiFS, etc.). This multiplication<br />

and cross-sharing of datasets among databases, while duplicating the<br />

work, guarantee the permanence of a dataset as it will still be available<br />

even if one database is closed. An incentive to sharing the data is found<br />

in the recent ef<strong>for</strong>t to consi<strong>de</strong>r data sharing as a genuine publication, associating<br />

a DOI to a data set. As such, institutions evaluating a researcher’s<br />

output can value his/her ef<strong>for</strong>t towards the scientific community through<br />

this marker.<br />

3.3. Bio-logging: an aca<strong>de</strong>mic and commercial en<strong>de</strong>avour<br />

Efficient bio-logging equipment is generally achieved through a close<br />

collaboration between engineers and users. However, research institutions<br />

able to combine both expertises un<strong>de</strong>r the same roof are scarce. In<br />

some privileged situations, an aca<strong>de</strong>mic collaboration can be <strong>de</strong>veloped<br />

between universities so as to link a <strong>de</strong>partment of biology and an engineering<br />

<strong>de</strong>partment <strong>for</strong> example. The highest technical sophistication can<br />

then be attained and complex and specific questions be answered. Once a<br />

prototype is created, engineers face more practical duties that may be less<br />

intellectually satisfying. Among those, the issue of proper conditioning<br />

and packaging of the <strong>de</strong>vice is critical. Most dysfunctions of bio-loggers


Part I – Chapter 1 31<br />

are due to practical packaging problems. Solving these problems requires<br />

a multidisciplinary and complex engineering approach. Once the equipment<br />

has finally been validated, biologists would request a large number<br />

of units and this is precisely when aca<strong>de</strong>mic systems reach their limits.<br />

In<strong>de</strong>ed, aca<strong>de</strong>mic bodies are (and probably should) not be involved into<br />

mass production as this would mean adopting an industrial approach to<br />

bio-loggers production. Industrial production implies that electronics<br />

hardware, software, connectic systems and batteries, circuit <strong>de</strong>sign and<br />

protection, casing and packaging, tests and validation, are all inclu<strong>de</strong>d<br />

at once in the reflexion process. Additionally at each stage of <strong>de</strong>velopment,<br />

costs are balanced and they influence <strong>de</strong>cisions at the next stage.<br />

Industries usually aim at producing the best <strong>de</strong>vice according to the cost<br />

it represents <strong>for</strong> them; and this is generally <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>d with consi<strong>de</strong>ration of<br />

the market, the number of potential customers and the most reasonable<br />

price per unit. Real and viable situations generally lay between these two<br />

positions. Subcontracting industrial fabrication could be an alternative<br />

<strong>for</strong> aca<strong>de</strong>mic <strong>de</strong>velopers. Aca<strong>de</strong>mic engineers and/or researchers could<br />

also create a start-up company based on what they <strong>de</strong>veloped to initially<br />

address their scientific needs. However, this involves an optimal knowledge<br />

of the scientific and technical need, as well as of the practical problems<br />

that may be encountered in the field while using the equipment.<br />

In a nutshell, everything reverts to the following question: is the <strong>de</strong>mand<br />

originating from users asking <strong>for</strong> specific <strong>de</strong>velopments (greater per<strong>for</strong>mance,<br />

new sensors…) or from the engineers anticipating the application<br />

of new technologies? Both stimulations are probably necessary to draw an<br />

ambitious but realistic product specification.<br />

4. Where do we go from here?<br />

4.1. Going toward large-scale <strong>de</strong>ployment<br />

For <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s, the paucity of manufacturers, the expensive price of biologgers,<br />

their restricted memory or battery capacity, as well as the lack of<br />

adapted analytical tools preclu<strong>de</strong>d the <strong>de</strong>ployment of numerous units at a<br />

time. Thanks to technological advances, such as those taking place in the<br />

mobile phone industry, some cheap, low consumption and consequently<br />

small bio-loggers have started to appear on the market. With these, largescale<br />

<strong>de</strong>ployments have become achievable. While occasionally dozen<br />

of <strong>de</strong>vices had been <strong>de</strong>ployed simultaneously to explore cooperative diving<br />

(Takahashi et al., 2004b), the first large-scale <strong>de</strong>ployments, in both<br />

space and time, originated through programs like the Tagging of Pacific<br />

Pelagics (Topp, Block et al., 2003, see also http://www.topp.org/). Since


32 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

the inception of the Topp programs, thousands of tags have been attached<br />

to 22 top predator species in the Pacific, including whales, sharks, sea<br />

turtles, seabirds, pinnipeds and even squids. Mass production of <strong>de</strong>vices is<br />

now a reality: it allows researchers to work at unprece<strong>de</strong>nted spatial scales<br />

and on entire populations of studied animals. In this field, the United<br />

Kingdom has taken a huge step <strong>for</strong>ward. For example, the long-life, minute<br />

geolocators <strong>de</strong>veloped by the British Antarctic Survey are <strong>de</strong>ployed on<br />

a worldwi<strong>de</strong> scale (e.g. Conklin et al. 2010). Recently, mass-production of<br />

GPS <strong>for</strong> mobile phone also created an alternative market where cheap GPS<br />

can be purchased by researchers who can re-conditioned them specifically<br />

to their needs. As an illustration of this, the IPHC bio-logging unit<br />

is modifying commercially-available GPS units (Cat Traq from Perthold<br />

Inc., http://www.mr-lee-catcam.<strong>de</strong>/ct_in<strong>de</strong>x_en.htm) to make them suitable<br />

<strong>for</strong> use on wild animals. However, there is a negative si<strong>de</strong> to this<br />

large-scale enthusiasm: cheap <strong>de</strong>vices do not always meet the usual scientific<br />

criteria. Lesser reliability or lower <strong>de</strong>gree of technical in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

must be balanced with the benefits that can arise from the use of these<br />

mass-production bio-loggers. In other words, caution in the use of cheap<br />

<strong>de</strong>vices must be taken to avoid impacting scientific excellence. Thorough<br />

calibration must be a premise to large-scale <strong>de</strong>ployments.<br />

4.2. Importance of multiple sensors<br />

As evoked briefly earlier in this chapter, the use of multiple sensors –<br />

when applicable – offers an ad<strong>de</strong>d value by providing a much complete<br />

picture of the behaviour and physiology of the animals in their environment.<br />

The combination of simple sensors (e.g. pressure sensor and<br />

temperature sensor) became a standard in even the simplest data loggers,<br />

but genuinely multi-sensor loggers are still few. Among those, it is worth<br />

mentioning the “daily diary” unit <strong>de</strong>veloped by Prof. Rory Wilson at the<br />

University of Swansea. Despite their relatively small size ranging between<br />

21 and 90g according to the size of animal, these bio-loggers can contain<br />

up to 14 different channels of both slow and fast sampling sensors working<br />

simultaneously (Wilson et al., 2008). Apart from the daily diary unit,<br />

multi-sensing <strong>de</strong>vices, either <strong>de</strong>veloped by research teams or commercially<br />

available (Wildlife Computers, Little Leonardo, Greeneridge Science,<br />

etc.), are used in large body sized mo<strong>de</strong>ls, e.g. fin whales Balaenoptera<br />

physalus (Goldboegen et al., 2006). To extend the applicability of multisensing<br />

<strong>de</strong>vices to smaller animals, special <strong>de</strong>velopments are nee<strong>de</strong>d (I,<br />

2); <strong>for</strong> example, a drastic reduction in the consumption is a pre-requisite<br />

to a generalisation of multi-sensing to species smaller than a 1-2 kg animal.<br />

In addition, new chemical sensors to <strong>de</strong>tect <strong>for</strong> example the level of<br />

oxygen in the water or the blood will pave the way <strong>for</strong> new generations of


Part I – Chapter 1 33<br />

multi-sensing bio-loggers with new requirements and constraints <strong>for</strong> the<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopers. Here, a distinction must be ma<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong>pending on the acquisition<br />

rates of these new sensors. The <strong>de</strong>ployment of sensors <strong>for</strong> quasi-static<br />

parameters <strong>for</strong> which the sampling interval is equal or longer than 1s (e.g.<br />

temperature, light, pressure…) would not cause any trouble as transducers<br />

use low power and the volume of data is small. However, the use of sensors<br />

<strong>for</strong> medium speed parameters sampled typically between 10 and 100Hz<br />

(e.g. accelerometers, gyroscopes, etc.) requires larger memory volume and<br />

greater energy to store the data. Even stronger difficulties are faced <strong>for</strong><br />

sensors that acquire high speed parameters (more than 100Hz) like electrocardiograms,<br />

electromyograms, or electroencephalograms. Numerous<br />

technical problems occur, and a special electronic architecture is nee<strong>de</strong>d<br />

to manage the high volume of memory, high speed communication <strong>for</strong><br />

data transfer, and so on.<br />

With the million of data points that the daily diary units can generate, the<br />

next challenge will be to <strong>de</strong>velop a software able to handle, display and<br />

summarise the complex in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>de</strong>livered by the next generation of<br />

bio-loggers. Prof. Wilson thus invested an important amount of energy,<br />

resources and time in <strong>de</strong>veloping such a tool and did it in such a way that<br />

its utilisation can reach a larger public than the scientific community<br />

alone (Wilson et al., 2008, http://www.swan.ac.uk/biosci/research/smart/<br />

smartsoftware/). The software allows users to interpret the data from the<br />

bio-loggers so as to truly reconstruct behaviour and visualise it. For example,<br />

data points from the magnetometer, gyroscope, accelerometer and<br />

altitu<strong>de</strong> sensors are combined and the result on the screen is an albatross<br />

(a computer graphic one, of course) flying in three dimensions following<br />

the exact paths that the original albatross flew. Beyond the example of<br />

the daily diary, visualisation software to accommodate complex and large<br />

datasets and display them in a pleasant and efficient manner is becoming<br />

increasingly available. The statistical free software R is of course powerful<br />

and readily accessible but its lack of user-friendliness may sometimes<br />

limit its popularity <strong>for</strong> complex analyses and representations. Alternatives<br />

to R are numerous and we can only mention Igor Wavemetrics, which<br />

was recurrently presented at the last bio-logging symposium (http://www.<br />

wavemetrics.com/).<br />

4.3. Combining the best of biotelemetry and bio-logging<br />

Biotelemetry – at least in theory – clearly has its advantages, especially as<br />

long as securing data is concerned. However, real-time data transmission<br />

is practically hampered by numerous factors leading to a temporary interruption<br />

in communication, which in turn means a <strong>de</strong>finite loss of measurements<br />

(Vincent et al., 2002; Costa et al., 2010). These blank periods


34 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

are generally due to technical limitations (e.g. signal attenuation, wave’s<br />

absorption by the environment, electromagnetic interferences, etc.) and<br />

to the behaviour of the animal to which the transmitter is attached (e.g.<br />

relative position of body and antenna, immersion in water or in a burrow,<br />

etc.). In comparison, bio-logging seems the perfect solution. Yet it<br />

suffers from an important drawback: the bio-logger has to be connected<br />

back to a computer at the end of the experiment to retrieve the data,<br />

which means that the animal has to be still alive, re-localised, re-captured<br />

and should still be carrying a bio-logger that is still functioning! In other<br />

word, <strong>de</strong>ploying a bio-logger represents a binary game: if only one point<br />

goes wrong in the chain, no data are collected.<br />

Obviously, combining the capabilities of the two methods seems to be<br />

the solution. An i<strong>de</strong>al <strong>de</strong>vice would record permanently the data in an<br />

embed<strong>de</strong>d memory, and would then transmit them regularly to a base<br />

station. Of course, this basic principle needs to be adjusted to each experimental<br />

situation. Data may be transferred following a fixed schedule, <strong>for</strong><br />

instance when an animal returns to a fixed location in space and time.<br />

As a consequence this would only require a single base station installed<br />

within radio range of such a site where the animal is known to be found at<br />

regular interval, and with a bidirectional connection between the logger<br />

and the station. The base station would be filled gradually with data from<br />

the logger, and be downloa<strong>de</strong>d by the user when nee<strong>de</strong>d. If the animal disappears<br />

only the data collected after the last transfer with the base station<br />

are lost. Alternatively, the base station can interrogate the environment at<br />

fixed schedules or be triggered manually to search <strong>for</strong> a telemetric logger<br />

within its reception range (see the approach <strong>de</strong>veloped by the University<br />

of Amsterdam, Shamoun-Baranes et al., 2011). The reverse strategy consists<br />

in asking the telemetric logger to regularly scan the radio-frequency<br />

environment, in or<strong>de</strong>r to search <strong>for</strong> a base station. In this case, scattering<br />

numerous base stations in a given experimental area would enhance<br />

the success rate of data transfer. These stations can also communicate<br />

between each other to optimise data organization and synchronisation.<br />

Additionally, each base station can communicate with a large number of<br />

telemetric loggers. The last step in this concept consists in bio-loggers able<br />

to communicate not only with base stations, but also among themselves,<br />

leading to a genuine network of communicating <strong>de</strong>vices. Data would then<br />

be shared with all the loggers coming within communication range and<br />

then transferred to a base station when one logger is close to it. A nonnegligible<br />

si<strong>de</strong> aspect of such an approach is the possibility to investigate<br />

proximity between animals, including time, duration and possibly<br />

distance of encounters. While theoretically attractive, a fair amount of<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment has to be done to reach this grand challenge. Both advances<br />

in electronics and data communication protocols are required. Progresses


Part I – Chapter 1 35<br />

in theoretical studies over software that could be able to manage such<br />

complex sets of interactions are paramount to the future success of these<br />

bio-logging networks and cannot involve only one type of institutions.<br />

5. Conclusion<br />

Bio-logging has gone through several steps from mechanical to digital,<br />

and from bulkiness to miniaturisation. The field is now moving towards<br />

globalisation and large scale coverage. In the marine realm, bio-logging<br />

coupled to automatic i<strong>de</strong>ntification and weighing systems such as those<br />

that exist in the Antarctic could serve as a basis <strong>for</strong> long term monitoring<br />

programs. Such observatories would thus act in parallel with weather<br />

or oceanographic stations to <strong>de</strong>liver data on Antarctic biodiversity. This<br />

concept can be exten<strong>de</strong>d to the terrestrial realm with a network of sensing<br />

no<strong>de</strong>s monitoring the state of terrestrial ecosystems over time. With the<br />

rapid modifications affecting all ecosystems on Earth, monitoring programs<br />

such as these are urgently nee<strong>de</strong>d. The diversification of the data<br />

collected, the increase in the temporal coverage and accessibility of biologged<br />

data, and the possibility <strong>for</strong> large number of units to be <strong>de</strong>ployed in<br />

a given environment concur to promote bio-logging as the key approach<br />

<strong>for</strong> ecological sciences in the future.<br />

Authors’ references<br />

Yan Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt, Akiko Kato, Francis Crenner:<br />

Université <strong>de</strong> Strasbourg, Institut pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, UMR<br />

7178, Strasbourg, France<br />

David Grémillet:<br />

Centre d’écologie fonctionnelle et évolutive, UMR 5175, Montpellier,<br />

France<br />

University of Cape Town, FitzPatrick Institute, DST/NRF Excellence<br />

Centre, Ron<strong>de</strong>bosch, South Africa<br />

Corresponding author: Yan Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt, yan.ropert-cou<strong>de</strong>rt@iphc.<br />

cnrs.fr


36 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Aknowledgement<br />

We thank Prof. Y. Naito <strong>for</strong> his <strong>de</strong>dication to promote bio-logging even<br />

after his retirement. We also thank Prof. Rory Wilson <strong>for</strong> sharing his passion<br />

<strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>velopment and application of novel bio-loggers to a wi<strong>de</strong><br />

range of species.<br />

References<br />

Ancel A., Horning M., Kooyman G. L., 1997. Prey ingestion revealed by<br />

oesophagus and stomach temperature recordings in cormorants. Journal<br />

of Experimental Biology, 200, pp. 149-154.<br />

Bannasch R., Wilson R.P., Culik B., 1994. Hydrodynamics aspects of <strong>de</strong>sign<br />

and attachment of a back-mounted <strong>de</strong>vice in penguins. Journal of<br />

Experimental Biology, 194, pp. 83-96.<br />

Beaulieu M., Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt Y., Le Maho Y., Ancel A., 2010. Is abdominal<br />

implantation of <strong>de</strong>vices a good alternative to external attachment?<br />

A comparative study in A<strong>de</strong>lie penguins. Journal of Ornithology, 151,<br />

pp. 579-586.<br />

Boyd I. L., 1993. Selecting sampling frequency <strong>for</strong> measuring diving behaviour.<br />

Marine Mammal Science, 9, pp. 424-430.<br />

Casper R. M., 2009. Gui<strong>de</strong>lines <strong>for</strong> the instrumentation of wild birds and<br />

mammals. Animal Behaviour, 78, pp. 1477-1483<br />

Charrassin J.-B., Park Y. H., Le Maho Y., Bost C.-A., 2002. Penguins as<br />

oceanographers unravel hid<strong>de</strong>n mechanisms of marine productivity.<br />

Ecology Letters, 5, pp. 317-319.<br />

Charrassin J.-B., Hin<strong>de</strong>ll M. A., Rintoul S., Roquet F., Sokolov S., biuw M.,<br />

Costa D. P., boehme L., Lovell P., Coleman R., Timmermann R., Meijers<br />

A., Meredith M., Park y.-H., bailleul F., Tremblay y., bost C.-A., McMahon<br />

C. R., Field I. C., Fedak M. A., Guinet C., 2008. Southern ocean frontal<br />

structure and sea-ice <strong>for</strong>mation rates revealed by elephant seals. Proceedings<br />

of the National aca<strong>de</strong>my of sciences of the USA, 105, pp. 11634-11639.<br />

Conklin J. R., Battley P. F., Potter M. A., Fox J. W., 2010. Breeding latitu<strong>de</strong><br />

drives individual schedules in a trans-hemispheric migrant bird. Nature<br />

Communication, 1, pp. 67.<br />

Cooke S. J., 2008. Biotelemetry and biologging in endangered species research<br />

and animal conservation: relevance to regional, national, and IUCN Red<br />

List threat assessments. Endangered Species Research, 4, pp. 165-185.<br />

Cooke S. J., Hinch S. G., Wikelski M., Andrews R. D., Kuchel L. J., Wolcott<br />

T. G., Butler P. J., 2004. Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to <strong>ecology</strong>.<br />

Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, pp. 334-343.<br />

Costa D. P., 1988. Methods <strong>for</strong> studying the energetics of freely diving animals.<br />

Canadian Journal of Zoology, 66, pp. 45-52.


Part I – Chapter 1 37<br />

Costa D. P., Robinson P. W., Arnould J. P. Y., Harrison A.-L., Simmons S. E.,<br />

Hassrick J. L., Hoskins A. J., Kirkman S. P., Oosthuizen H., Villegas-<br />

Amtmann S., Crocker D. E., 2010. Accuracy of Argos locations of<br />

pinnipeds at-sea estimated using fastloc GPS. PLoS One, 5, e8677.<br />

Daunt F., Peters G., Scott B., Grémillet D., Wanless S., 2003. Rapid-response<br />

recor<strong>de</strong>rs reveal interplay between marine physics and seabird behaviour.<br />

Marine Ecology Progress Series, 255, pp. 282-288.<br />

Davis R. W., Fuiman L. A., Williams T. M., Collier S. O., Hagey W. P., Kanatous<br />

S. B., Kohin S., Horning M., 1999. Hunting behavior of a marine mammal<br />

beneath the Antarctic fast ice. Science, 283, pp. 993-996.<br />

Eichhorn G., Groscolas R., Le Glaunec G., Parisel C., Arnold L., Medina P.,<br />

Handrich Y., 2011. Heterothermy in growing king penguins. Nature<br />

Communications, 2, pp. 435.<br />

Froget G., Handrich Y., Le Maho Y., Rouanet J. L., Woakes A. J., Butler P. J.,<br />

2002. The heart rate/oxygen consumption relationship during cold<br />

exposure of the king penguin: a comparison with that during exercise.<br />

Journal of Experimental Biology, 205, pp. 2511-2517.<br />

Fort J., Pettex E., Tremblay Y., Lorentsen S.-H., Garthe S., Votier S., Pons J.-B.,<br />

Siorat F., Furness R. W., Grecian,W. J., Bearhop S., Montevecchi W. A.,<br />

Grémillet D., in press. Meta-population evi<strong>de</strong>nce of oriented chainmigration<br />

in northern gannets. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment.<br />

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/110194.<br />

Gilbert C., Blanc S., Le Maho Y., Ancel A., 2008. Energy saving processes<br />

in huddling emperor penguins: from experiments to theory. Journal of<br />

Experimental Biology, 211, pp. 1-8.<br />

Gillies J. A., Thomas A. L., Taylor G. K., 2011. Soaring and manoeuvring flight<br />

of a steppe eagle Aquila nipalensis. Journal of Avian biology, 42, pp. 377-386.<br />

Goldbogen J. A., Calambokidis J., Shadwick R. E., Oleson E. M., McDonald M.<br />

A., Hil<strong>de</strong>brand J. A., 2006. Kinematics of <strong>for</strong>aging dives and lunge-feeding<br />

in fin whales. Journal of Experimental Biology, 209, pp. 1231-1244.<br />

Green J. A., Butler P. J., Woakes A. J., Boyd I. L., Hol<strong>de</strong>r R. L., 2001. Heart rate<br />

and rate of oxygen consumption of exercising macaroni penguins. Journal<br />

of Experimental Biology, 204, pp. 673-684.<br />

Green J. A., Tanton J. L., Woakes A. J., Boyd I. L., Butler P. J., 2004. Effects<br />

of long-term implanted data loggers on macaroni penguins Eudyptes<br />

chrysolophus. Journal of Avian Biology, 35, pp. 370-376.<br />

Grémillet D., Kuntz G., Woakes A. J., Gilbert C., Robin J.-P., Le Maho Y.,<br />

Butler P. J., 2005. Year-round recordings of behavioural and physiological<br />

parameters reveal the survival strategy of a poorly insulated diving<br />

endotherm during the Arctic winter. Journal of Experimental Biology,<br />

208, pp. 4231-4241.<br />

Grémillet D., Müllers R. H., Moseley C., Pichegru L., Coetzee J. C., Sabarros<br />

P. S., van <strong>de</strong>r Lingen C., Ryan P. G., Kato A., Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt Y., 2010.<br />

Seabirds, fisheries, and cameras. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment,<br />

8, pp. 401-402.


38 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Grémillet D., Plös A. L., 1994. The use of stomach temperature records <strong>for</strong> the<br />

calculation of daily food intake in cormorants. Journal of Experimental<br />

Biology, 189, pp. 105-115.<br />

Halsey L. G., Shepard E. L., Hulston C. J., Venables M. C., White C. R.,<br />

Jeukendrup A. E., Wilson R. P., 2008. Acceleration versus heart rate <strong>for</strong><br />

estimating energy expenditure and speed during locomotion in animals:<br />

tests with an easy mo<strong>de</strong>l species, Homo sapiens. Zoology, 111, pp. 231-241.<br />

Handrich Y., Bevan R. M., Charrassin J.-B., Butler P. J., Pütz K., Woakes A. J.,<br />

Lage J., Le Maho Y., 1997. Hypothermia in <strong>for</strong>aging king penguins. Nature,<br />

388, pp. 64-67.<br />

Hedd A., Gales R., Renouf D., 1995. Use of temperature telemetry to monitor<br />

ingestion by a harbour seal mother and her pup throughout lactation.<br />

Polar Biology, 15, pp. 155-160.<br />

Kooyman G. L., 1965. Techniques used in measuring diving capacities of<br />

Wed<strong>de</strong>ll seals. Polar Record, 12, pp. 391–394.<br />

Kooyman G. L., 1966. Maximum diving capacities of the Wed<strong>de</strong>ll Seal,<br />

Leptonychotes wed<strong>de</strong>lli. Science, 151, pp. 1553-1554.<br />

McPhee J. M., Rosen D. A. S., Andrews R. D., Trites A. W., 2003. Predicting<br />

metabolic rate from heart rate in juvenile Steller sea lions Eumetopias<br />

jubatus. Journal of Experimental Biology, 206, pp. 1941-1951.<br />

Mitani Y., Sato K., Ito S., Cameron M. F., Siniff D. B., Naito Y., 2003. A method<br />

<strong>for</strong> reconstructing three-dimensional dive profiles of marine mammals<br />

using geomagnetic intensity data: results from two lactating Wed<strong>de</strong>ll seals.<br />

Polar Biology, 26, pp. 311-317.<br />

Naito Y., 2004. New steps in bio-logging science. Memoirs of the National<br />

Institute of Polar Research, Special Issue, 58, pp. 50-54.<br />

Naito Y., 2010. What Is “Bio-Logging”? Aquatic Mammals, 36, pp. 307-322.<br />

Naito Y., Asaga T., Ohyama Y., 1990. Diving behavior of A<strong>de</strong>lie penguins<br />

<strong>de</strong>termined by Time-Depth-Recor<strong>de</strong>r. The Condor, 92, pp. 582-586.<br />

Nolet B. A., Butler P. J., Masman D., Woakes A. J., 1992. Estimation of daily<br />

energy expenditure from heart rate and doubly labelled water in exercising<br />

geese. Physiological Zoology, 65, pp. 1188-1216.<br />

Phillips R. A., Xavier J. C., Croxall J. P., 2003. Effects of satellite transmitters on<br />

albatrosses and petrels. The Auk, 120, pp. 1082-1090.<br />

Ponganis P. J., Van Dam R. P., Marshall G., Knower T., Levenson D. H., 2000.<br />

Sub-ice <strong>for</strong>aging behavior of emperor penguins. Journal of Experimental<br />

Biology, 203, pp. 3275-3278.<br />

Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt Y., Beaulieu M., Hanuise N., Kato A., 2009b. Diving into the<br />

world of biologging. Endangered Species Research, 10, pp. 21-27.<br />

Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt Y., Brooks L., Yamamoto M., Kato A., 2009c. ECG Response<br />

of koalas to tourists proximity: a preliminary study. PLoS One, 4, e7378.<br />

Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt Y., Grémillet D., Kato A., Ryan P. G., Naito Y., Le Maho Y.,<br />

2004a. A fine-scale time budget of Cape gannets provi<strong>de</strong>s insights into the<br />

<strong>for</strong>aging strategies of coastal seabirds. Animal Behaviour, 67, pp. 985-992.


Part I – Chapter 1 39<br />

Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt Y., Kato A., 2006a. Are stomach temperature recor<strong>de</strong>rs a useful<br />

tool <strong>for</strong> <strong>de</strong>termining feeding activity? Polar Bioscience, 20, pp. 63-72.<br />

Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt y., Kato A., baudat J., bost C.-A., Le Maho y., Naito y.,<br />

2001. Feeding strategies of free-ranging Adélie penguins, Pygoscelis<br />

a<strong>de</strong>liae, analysed by multiple data recording. Polar biology, 24, pp. 460-<br />

466.<br />

Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt Y., Kato A., Chiaradia A., 2009a. Impact of small-scale<br />

environmental perturbations on local marine food resources: a case study<br />

of a predator, the little penguin. Proceedings of the Royal Society of<br />

London B, 276, pp. 4105-4109.<br />

Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt Y., Kato A., Liebsch N., Wilson R. P., Muller G., Baubet E.,<br />

2004b. Monitoring jaw movements: A cue to feeding activity. Game and<br />

Wildlife Science, 21, pp. 1-19.<br />

Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt Y., Kato A., Wilson R. P., Cannell B., 2006b. Foraging strategies<br />

and prey encounter rate of free-ranging Little Penguins. Marine Biology,<br />

149, pp. 139-148.<br />

Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt Y., Wilson R. P., 2004. Subjectivity in bio-logging science: do<br />

logged data mislead? Memoirs of the National Institute of polar research,<br />

58, pp. 23-33.<br />

Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt Y., Wilson R. P., 2005. Trends and perspectives in animalattached<br />

remote sensing. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 3,<br />

pp. 437-444.<br />

Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt Y., Wilson R. P., Grémillet D., Kato A., Lewis S., Ryan, P. G.,<br />

2006b. Electrocardiogram recordings in free-ranging gannets reveal<br />

minimum difference in heart rate during flapping versus gliding flight.<br />

Marine Ecology Progress Series, 328, pp. 275-284.<br />

Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt Y., Wilson R. P., Yoda K., Kato A., 2007. Assessing per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

constraints in penguins with externally-attached <strong>de</strong>vices. Marine Ecolgy<br />

Progress Series, 333, pp. 281-289.<br />

Roquet F., Charrassin J.-B., Marchand S., Boehme L., Fedak M., Reverdin G.,<br />

Guinet C., 2011. Delayed-mo<strong>de</strong> calibration of hydrographic data obtained<br />

from animal-borne satellite relay data loggers. Journal of Atmospheric and<br />

Oceanic Technologies, 28, pp. 787-801.<br />

Rutz C., Bluff L. A., Weir A. A. S., Kacelnik A., 2007. Vi<strong>de</strong>o cameras on wild<br />

birds. Science, 318, pp. 765.<br />

Ryan P. G., Petersen S., Peters G., Grémillet D., 2004. GPS tracking a marine<br />

predator: the effects of precision, resolution and sampling rate on <strong>for</strong>aging<br />

tracks of African Penguins. Marine Biology, 145, pp. 215-223.<br />

Sakamoto K.Q., Takahashi A., Iwata T., Trathan P. N., 2009. From the eye of the<br />

albatrosses: a bird-borne camera shows an association between albatrosses<br />

and a Killer Whale in the Southern Ocean. PLoS One, 4, e7322.<br />

Shamoun-Baranes J., Bouten W., Camphuysen C. J., Baaij E., 2011. Riding the<br />

ti<strong>de</strong>: intriguing observations of gulls resting at sea during breeding. Ibis,<br />

153, pp. 411-415.


40 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Speakman, J.R., 1997. Doubly labelled water: theory and practice, Chapman &<br />

Hall, London.<br />

Suzuki I., Naito Y., Folkow L. P., Miyazaki N., Blix A. S., 2009. Validation of<br />

a <strong>de</strong>vice <strong>for</strong> accurate timing of feeding events in marine animals. Polar<br />

Biology, 32, pp. 667-671.<br />

Takahashi A., Sato K., Naito Y., Dunn M., Trathan P. N., Croxall J. P.,<br />

2004a. Penguin-mounted cameras glimpse un<strong>de</strong>rwater group behaviour.<br />

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 271, pp. 281-282.<br />

Takahashi A., Sato K., Nishikawa J., Watanuki Y., Naito Y., 2004b. Synchronous<br />

diving behavior of A<strong>de</strong>lie penguins. Journal of Ethology, 22, pp. 5-11.<br />

Vinatier F., Chailleux A., Duyck P.-F., Salmon F., Lescourret F., Tixier P.,<br />

2010. Radiotelemetry unravels movements of a walking insect species in<br />

heterogeneous environments. Animal Behaviour, 80, pp. 221-229.<br />

Vincent C., McConnell B. J., Ridoux V., Fedak M. A., 2002. Assessment of<br />

Argos location accuracy from satellite tags <strong>de</strong>ployed on captive gray seals.<br />

Marine Mammal Science, 18, pp. 156-166.<br />

Viviant M., Trites A. W., Rosen D. A. S., Monestiez P., Guinet C., 2010. Prey<br />

capture attempts can be <strong>de</strong>tected in Steller sea lions and other marine<br />

predators using accelerometers. Polar Biology, 33, pp. 713-719.<br />

Ward S., Bishop C. M., Woakes A. J., Butler P. J., 2002. Heart rate and the<br />

rate of oxygen consumption of flying and walking barnacle geese (Branta<br />

leucopsis) and bar-hea<strong>de</strong>d geese (Anser indicus). Journal of Experimental<br />

Biology, 205, pp. 3347-3356.<br />

Watanabe S., Izawa M., Kato A., Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt Y., Naito Y., 2005. A new<br />

technique <strong>for</strong> monitoring the <strong>de</strong>tailed behaviour of terrestrial animals:<br />

A case study with the domestic cat. Applied Animal Behaviour Science,<br />

94, pp. 117-131.<br />

Watanabe y., bornemann H., Liebsch N., Plötz J., Sato K., Naito y., Miyazaki<br />

N., 2006. Seal-mounted cameras <strong>de</strong>tect invertebrate fauna on the<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rsi<strong>de</strong> of an Antarctic ice shelf. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 309,<br />

pp. 297-300.<br />

Watanabe Y., Mitani Y., Sato K., Cameron M. F., Naito Y., 2003. Dive <strong>de</strong>pths<br />

of Wed<strong>de</strong>ll seals in relation to vertical prey distribution as estimated by<br />

image data. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 252, pp. 283–288.<br />

Weimerskirch H., Shaffer S. A., Mabille G., Martin J., Boutard O., Rouanet<br />

J.-L., 2002. Heart rate and energy expenditure of incubating wan<strong>de</strong>ring<br />

albatrosses: basal levels, natural variation, and the effects of human<br />

disturbance. Journal of Experimental Biology, 205, pp. 475-483.<br />

Wikelski M., Moskowitz D., A<strong>de</strong>lman J. S., Cochran J., Wilcove D. S., May<br />

M. L., 2006. Simple rules gui<strong>de</strong> dragonfly migration. Biology Letters, 2,<br />

pp. 325-329<br />

Willis K., Horning M., 2005. A novel approach to measuring heat flux in<br />

swimming animals. Journal of experimental marine biology and <strong>ecology</strong>,<br />

315, pp. 147-162.


Part I – Chapter 1 41<br />

Wilson R. P., Cooper J., Plötz J., 1992b. Can we <strong>de</strong>termine when marine<br />

endotherms feed? A case study with seabirds. Journal of Experimental<br />

Biology, 167, pp. 267-275.<br />

Wilson R. P., Culik B. M., Bannasch R., Lage J., 1994. Monitoring Antarctic<br />

environmental variables using penguins. Marine Ecology Progress Series,<br />

106, pp. 199-202.<br />

Wilson R. P., Ducamp J. J., Ress W. G., Culik B. M., Niekamp K., 1992a.<br />

Estimation of location: global coverage using light intensity, in: Prie<strong>de</strong>,<br />

I.G. and Swift S. M. (Eds). Wildlife telemetry: remote monitoring and<br />

tracking of animals. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp. 131-134.<br />

Wilson R. P., Liebsch N., 2003. Up-beat motion in swinging limbs: new insights<br />

into assessing movement in free-living aquatic vertebrates. Marine Biology,<br />

142, pp. 537-547.<br />

Wilson R. P., Pütz K., Grémillet D., Culik B. M., Kierspel M., Regel J., Bost<br />

C.-A., Lage J., Cooper J., 1995. Reliability of stomach temperature changes<br />

in <strong>de</strong>termining feeding characteristics of seabirds. Journal of Experimental<br />

Biology, 198, pp. 1115-1135.<br />

Wilson R. P., Scolaro A., Quintana F., Siebert U., Straten M. T., Mills K.,<br />

Zimmer I., Liebsch N., Steinfurth A., Spindler G., Müller G., 2004. To the<br />

bottom of the heart: cloacal movement as an in<strong>de</strong>x of cardiac frequency,<br />

respiration and digestive evacuation in penguins. Marine Biology, 144,<br />

pp. 813-827.<br />

Wilson R. P., Shepard E. L. C., Liebsch N., 2008. Prying into the intimate<br />

<strong>de</strong>tails of animal lives: use of a daily diary on animals. Endangered Species<br />

Research, 4, pp. 123-137.<br />

Wilson R. P., Steinfurth A., Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt Y., Kato A., Kurita M., 2002. Lipreading<br />

in remote subjects: an attempt to quantify and separate ingestion,<br />

breathing and vocalisation in free-living animals using penguins as a<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>l. Marine Biology, 140, pp. 17-27.<br />

Wilson R. P., White C. R., Quintana F., Halsey L. G., Liebsch N., Martin G. R.,<br />

Butler P. J., 2006. Moving towards acceleration <strong>for</strong> estimates of activityspecific<br />

metabolic rate in free-living animals: the case of the cormorant.<br />

Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, pp. 1081-1090.<br />

Wilson R. P., Wilson M.-P. T., Link R., Mempel H., Adams N. J., 1991.<br />

Determinations of movements of african penguins Spheniscus <strong>de</strong>mersus<br />

using a compass system: <strong>de</strong>ad reckoning may be an alternative to telemetry.<br />

Journal of Experimental Biology, 157, pp. 557-564.<br />

Yoda K., Sato K., Niizuma Y., Kurita M., Bost C.-A., Le Maho Y., Naito Y.,<br />

1999. Precise monitoring of porpoising behaviour of A<strong>de</strong>lie penguins<br />

<strong>de</strong>termined using acceleration data loggers. Journal of Experimental<br />

Biology, 202, pp. 3121-3126.


Chapter 2<br />

Animal-borne sensors to study<br />

the <strong>de</strong>mography and behaviour<br />

of small species<br />

Olivier Guillaume, Aurélie Coulon, Jean-François Le Galliard, and Jean Clobert<br />

1. Introduction<br />

One of the main characteristics of ecological systems is their hierarchical<br />

organisation – communities are collections of species interacting with<br />

each other, species are groups of populations distributed spatially and<br />

connected through dispersal, and populations are ma<strong>de</strong> up of individuals.<br />

Despite the wi<strong>de</strong>spread opinion that individual variation is the raw<br />

material of ecological and evolutionary dynamics, ecological approaches<br />

at the level of communities or ecosystems have ten<strong>de</strong>d to ignore the large<br />

variation among individuals seen in their morphology, behaviour, or<br />

life histories (Bolnick et al., 2003). One of the reasons <strong>for</strong> this is that<br />

there are serious methodological constraints in our ability to i<strong>de</strong>ntify and<br />

track individuals of most animal species within complex communities.<br />

In<strong>de</strong>ed, most communities are ma<strong>de</strong> up of relatively small species, which<br />

are extremely challenging to mark and equip with sensors. For example,<br />

a large part of the world’s mammals weigh less than 100g (see figure 1,<br />

Gar<strong>de</strong>zi and da Silva, 1999) and the median body size of birds is around<br />

30-40g (Blackburn and Gaston, 1994). Yet, small animal species contributed<br />

a lot to our un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of ecological and evolutionary processes<br />

within natural populations, including population <strong>de</strong>mography, dispersal<br />

<strong>ecology</strong> and evolutionary <strong>ecology</strong> (e.g. Clobert et al., 2001). They also<br />

play an important part in many terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems on<br />

Earth, where they inclu<strong>de</strong> a large number of herbivores, small predators,<br />

as well as parasitoids, pollinators and plant mutualists.


44 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Figure 1: Relationship between species diversity (number of species) and species<br />

body mass (log-trans<strong>for</strong>med, kg) in a large data set of the world’s mammal species<br />

after Gar<strong>de</strong>zi and da Silva (1999). The distribution is significantly skewed to the<br />

right and indicates maximal species diversity <strong>for</strong> body mass around 25-63g. The<br />

dashed arrow represents the range of body mass (more than 100g) where animals can<br />

currently be fitted with some of the smallest bio-tracking and bio-logging <strong>de</strong>vices<br />

(assuming the <strong>de</strong>vice must weigh less than 3-5% of the body mass, see table 1).<br />

This review focuses on animals weighing less than 100g, which represents most<br />

vertebrate species on earth and almost all invertebrate species. © The University of<br />

Chicago Press, 1999.<br />

Several challenges <strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>velopment and proper implementation of<br />

animal-borne sensors on small terrestrial and aquatic animal species are<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntified. Appropriate <strong>de</strong>tection and marking techniques are nee<strong>de</strong>d <strong>for</strong><br />

the population <strong>ecology</strong> of many animal species, especially when rare and<br />

elusive ones are involved. In the field of movement <strong>ecology</strong>, gathering<br />

data on individual behaviour and movements of individuals in space and<br />

time, by using appropriate tracking technologies (also sometimes called<br />

bio-telemetry and referred to here as bio-tracking), is also fundamental.<br />

Finally, ecophysiological studies require gathering in<strong>for</strong>mation on individual<br />

physiological state as well as on environmental conditions using<br />

micrometeorological and physiological sensors. This chapter aims at<br />

i) <strong>de</strong>scribing methods and sensors that have been used to collect such<br />

behavioural and <strong>de</strong>mographic data on individuals of small animal species<br />

and ii) i<strong>de</strong>ntifying the main current limitations and challenges of existing<br />

technologies and the most urgent areas of <strong>de</strong>velopment in this domain.


Part I – Chapter 2 45<br />

Note that the methods reviewed here are also relevant <strong>for</strong> the juvenile<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms of many large species.<br />

We <strong>de</strong>fine and review sensors in the broad sense so as to inclu<strong>de</strong> individual<br />

marking techniques, bio-tracking techniques, and micrometeorological<br />

and physiological sensors sensu stricto. Animal-borne sensors may<br />

be <strong>de</strong>fined as any <strong>de</strong>vice installed on an animal that measures a physical<br />

or chemical quantity and converts it into a signal which can be read<br />

by an observer or by an instrument, <strong>for</strong> example a micrometeorological<br />

quantity (e.g. temperature) or a physiological quantity (e.g. glucose level).<br />

Some tag systems that give in<strong>for</strong>mation on the i<strong>de</strong>ntity and <strong>de</strong>vices that<br />

provi<strong>de</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation on location of study animals, <strong>for</strong> example through<br />

the use of radio emitters or harmonic radar tags carried by the individuals,<br />

can be also consi<strong>de</strong>red as a type of biological sensors. Note that the coupled<br />

system of sensors and data loggers installed on the animal is called<br />

a bio-logger, and differs from simple bio-telemetry tools in the sense that<br />

data are stored locally in the memory of the <strong>de</strong>vices and not transferred in<br />

real time via radio waves or other transmitting means. The <strong>de</strong>velopment<br />

and use of bio-loggers with large animals is reviewed in chapter 1 of this<br />

book by Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt et al., and we will briefly review its applications<br />

with small animals here.<br />

2. Methodological issues<br />

Studying small animals in their natural environment or in experimental<br />

infrastructures without interfering with their normal behaviour presents<br />

major challenges to ecologists. This is especially true when studies require<br />

equipping mo<strong>de</strong>l species with animal-borne sensors to measure and record<br />

environmental or physiological parameters. The main methodological<br />

issue with small animals lies in their weight and volume, which poses an<br />

upper limit on the size of sensors and constrains any marking and attachment<br />

technique. In<strong>de</strong>ed, tags and sensors must obviously neither interfere<br />

with the natural behaviour, nor influence the survival of the animals that<br />

carry them. Gui<strong>de</strong>lines generally recommend that sensors must weight less<br />

than 5% of the animal body mass <strong>for</strong> vertebrates, and less than 10% <strong>for</strong><br />

invertebrates (Cochran, 1980; Cant et al., 2005). However, those figures<br />

must be adjusted according to the study species and populations. For<br />

example, in species <strong>for</strong> which running, flying or swimming is essential,<br />

the maximum tolerated weight of the <strong>de</strong>vice should even be lighter (e.g.,<br />

Bedrosian and Craighead, 2007). The evaluation of the impacts of sensors,<br />

of their components, like the antenna, and of the fixation procedure<br />

has been per<strong>for</strong>med in various contexts, such as meta-analyses of survival,<br />

growth or fecundity, which showed some significant <strong>de</strong>trimental effects


46 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

(<strong>for</strong> example Bridger and Booth, 2003; Weatherhead and Blouin-Demers,<br />

2004; Whid<strong>de</strong>n et al., 2007). Hence, careful tests of animal-borne sensors<br />

and associated protocols should be conducted prior to <strong>de</strong>ployment in<br />

field or experimental conditions.<br />

In addition, small animals or juvenile <strong>for</strong>ms are often characterised by fast<br />

growth and high mortality, and some of these species may also be difficult<br />

to capture even when their populations are abundant. These <strong>de</strong>mographic<br />

facts put some challenges on the ability to recapture animals, relocate<br />

their tags and <strong>de</strong>sign appropriate attachment techniques. For example,<br />

juvenile <strong>for</strong>ms of many lizards must be equipped with sensors that must<br />

not interfere with their fast growth and strong susceptibility to predators,<br />

but at the same time should be inexpensive because of the high chance to<br />

loose sensors in the course of a standard <strong>de</strong>mographic study (Le Galliard<br />

et al., 2011). In the following section, we review available animal-borne<br />

sensors used to study the <strong>de</strong>mography and behaviour of animals, and discuss<br />

their applications and limits in the context of their implementation<br />

on small species.<br />

3. Specifications of animal-borne sensors <strong>for</strong> small species<br />

We list in table 1 some animal-borne sensors that can be commonly used<br />

to study <strong>de</strong>mography and behaviour including bio-tracking, where the<br />

focus is on animal movements and data are often obtained remotely<br />

using telemetry, and bio-logging, where combined in<strong>for</strong>mation on animal<br />

behaviour, physiology and habitat are typically recor<strong>de</strong>d and data<br />

are stored locally on an autonomous <strong>de</strong>vice installed on free-ranging<br />

animals. Bio-tracking technologies compatible with <strong>de</strong>mographic and<br />

behavioural studies of small animals inclu<strong>de</strong> small tags used to mark and<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntify individuals from a short distance like magnetic wire tags and<br />

passive Radio Frequency I<strong>de</strong>ntification tags (RFID, Canner and Spence,<br />

2011; Courtney et al., 2000; Bergman et al., 1992), also called passive<br />

integrated transpon<strong>de</strong>rs (PIT). Other tracking <strong>de</strong>vices such as harmonic<br />

radars, VHF transmitters or satellite based transmitters allow the localisation<br />

of small animals from a longer distance and there<strong>for</strong>e were used more<br />

often to study movement behaviour. Moreover, a range of more advanced<br />

bio-loggers can be used on small animals when remote transmission is<br />

not feasible and data should be stored locally. We review and discuss the<br />

use of these animal-borne sensors and techniques <strong>for</strong> small species. Other<br />

methods like vi<strong>de</strong>o or camera traps have been used in some instances to<br />

obtain in<strong>for</strong>mation on the abundance and <strong>ecology</strong> of small animals but<br />

they are less flexible and in<strong>for</strong>mative than bio-tracking and bio-logging<br />

technologies (see IV, 2, <strong>for</strong> a case study).


Part I – Chapter 2 47<br />

3. 1. Marking and tracking small animals with passive RFID tags<br />

It may be difficult to i<strong>de</strong>ntify small animals with the help of techniques<br />

that avoid undue pain and stress, have no effect on fitness traits, and produce<br />

marks that are not easily lost. Non-invasive techniques, such as paint<br />

marks or bead-tags, do not ensure the i<strong>de</strong>ntification of a large number of<br />

individuals and are often only temporary, except <strong>for</strong> rings. Thus, most<br />

<strong>de</strong>mographic studies of small species involve more invasive techniques<br />

such as branding, toe-clipping or scale-clipping. To avoid the potential<br />

pain and stress caused by these techniques, passive integrated transpon<strong>de</strong>rs<br />

(PIT) tags, also called passive RFID (radio frequency i<strong>de</strong>ntification)<br />

tags, have been recommen<strong>de</strong>d because these ones provi<strong>de</strong> permanent and<br />

reliable individual marks. This technology uses communication via radio<br />

waves to exchange data (i<strong>de</strong>ntification number) between a rea<strong>de</strong>r and<br />

a passive electronic tag attached to the animal (Gibbons and Andrews,<br />

2004). Examples of their use inclu<strong>de</strong> tracking studies where “antennas”<br />

positioned in the natural habitat are connected to the rea<strong>de</strong>r. However,<br />

because the animal can only be <strong>de</strong>tected at a short distance (see table 1),<br />

antennas must be located at places of maximal use by animals (e.g. dispersal<br />

corridors, nests or burrows, runways, etc.). We used this technology<br />

to study the spatial <strong>ecology</strong> of small mammals in northern Europe,<br />

even during the winter snow period (Hoset et al., 2008; Le Galliard et<br />

al., 2007). The custom-ma<strong>de</strong> system was <strong>de</strong>veloped by Harald Steen and<br />

Lars Korslund from the University of Oslo (Korslund and Steen, 2006).<br />

It consists of a tube-shaped single coil antenna (20 × 4cm) placed on<br />

the ground along runways to maximize recording rates, and attached<br />

to Trovan® LID665 OEM PIT tag <strong>de</strong>co<strong>de</strong>rs (LID665, EID Aalten BV,<br />

Aalten, Netherlands) that record PIT-tag number, date and hour each time<br />

a tagged vole passed through the antenna (see figure 2). There are however<br />

potential difficulties with PIT tags: they cannot be injected on the<br />

juvenile <strong>for</strong>ms of most species, tags may get lost through the injection site,<br />

and injection as well as retention of these tags can cause small species pain<br />

and harm (e.g. Le Galliard et al., 2011).<br />

3. 2. Harmonic radars <strong>for</strong> tracking very small animals<br />

Harmonic radar is becoming common to track small animals. Several<br />

studies recor<strong>de</strong>d trajectories of hundreds of metres of very small animals,<br />

especially flying insects like beetles, honeybees or butterflies. Those<br />

studies focused on migration, dispersal, <strong>for</strong>aging, or flight behaviour and<br />

assessed environmental factors influencing movements (e.g. Chapman et<br />

al., 2011 and references therein). The harmonic radar system consists of<br />

an emitter that generates a micro-wave signal of a <strong>de</strong>termined frequency.<br />

The tag – composed of a dio<strong>de</strong> connected to a wire antenna – receives


48 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Category Sensor type In<strong>for</strong>mation Data acquisition Detection range<br />

Passive RFID tag<br />

I<strong>de</strong>ntity and<br />

location<br />

Scanning with a specific<br />

radiofrequency source<br />

< 1 m with onground<br />

antenna<br />

Passive wire tag<br />

I<strong>de</strong>ntity<br />

I<strong>de</strong>ntity and<br />

location<br />

Visual reading after<br />

extraction<br />

Scanning with a specific<br />

magnetic source<br />

Requires recapture<br />

3 cm with handheld<br />

antenna<br />

Biotracking<br />

Harmonic radar<br />

Location<br />

Scanning with a specific<br />

radiofrequency source<br />

Up to hundreds<br />

of meters with onground<br />

radars<br />

Radio<br />

transmitter<br />

I<strong>de</strong>ntity and<br />

location<br />

VHF receiver connected<br />

to an antenna<br />

Up to 50 m with onground<br />

antenna<br />

GPS tracking<br />

I<strong>de</strong>ntity and<br />

location<br />

Satellite relay or VHF<br />

receiver connected to an<br />

antenna<br />

Global with<br />

satellites, hundreds<br />

meters with VHF<br />

Satellite PTT<br />

I<strong>de</strong>ntity and<br />

location<br />

Satellite relay (Argos)<br />

Global<br />

GLS logger<br />

Location<br />

Direct communication<br />

port to data logger<br />

Requires recapture<br />

GPS data logger<br />

Location<br />

Direct communication<br />

port to data logger<br />

Requires recaptures<br />

Biologging<br />

Data storage tag<br />

Light,<br />

temperature;<br />

humidity, tilt;<br />

pressure and<br />

<strong>de</strong>pth; magnetic<br />

field strength;<br />

pitch and roll;<br />

conductivity,<br />

salinity, dissolved<br />

oxygen, pH,<br />

imaging, EEG,<br />

ECG, EMG, etc<br />

Direct communication<br />

port to data logger<br />

Requires recapture<br />

Combined<br />

<strong>de</strong>vices<br />

Data storage<br />

tags, and GPS<br />

and GLS loggers<br />

combined with<br />

VHF and/or<br />

Argos <strong>for</strong> remote<br />

transmission<br />

Bio-logging + biotracking<br />

Satellite relay or VHF<br />

receiver connected to an<br />

antenna<br />

Global with<br />

satellite, hundreds<br />

meters with VHF<br />

relay<br />

Table 1. Specifications of some available sensors used in <strong>de</strong>mographic and<br />

behavioural studies of small animals. Bio-tracking refers to the process of<br />

gathering remotely i<strong>de</strong>ntity and/or location data on the study animal using<br />

passive or active <strong>de</strong>vices, even if data may be stored locally prior to retrieval.<br />

Bio-logging differs from telemetry because data (location, animal physiology,<br />

or environment) are stored locally in the memory of the <strong>de</strong>vices and must<br />

be downloa<strong>de</strong>d via a communication port. Combined <strong>de</strong>vices allow to store


Part I – Chapter 2 49<br />

Accuracy<br />

Smallest <strong>de</strong>vice<br />

Approximate lifespan<br />

of smallest <strong>de</strong>vice<br />

< 1m 1 × 6 mm, 7.15 mg Unlimited<br />

- 0.25 × 0.5 mm, small weight Unlimited<br />

Few meters 12 mm long, 3 mg Unlimited<br />

Few meters 10 × 5 mm, antenna 70 mm, 0.2 g Ten days<br />

Few meters<br />

15g<br />

From hours in real-time to months<br />

<strong>de</strong>pending on the data acquisition<br />

and retrieval procedures<br />

Hundreds of meters 5 g Several months<br />

Hundred kilometres 0.5 g Up to several years<br />

Meters<br />

22 × 14 mm, antenna 7 mm, 2 g<br />

From hours to months <strong>de</strong>pending<br />

on the numbers of locations<br />

iButton (temperature): 17 × 6 mm, 1.49 g<br />

> 1 year<br />

-<br />

Meters with GPS,<br />

ten meters with<br />

VHF, hundred<br />

meters with Argos<br />

Geolocating archival tags (geolocation,<br />

internal and external temperature,<br />

pressure, light, sea water switch):<br />

8 × 20 × 6.7 mm, 1.9 g<br />

Archival Tag (temperature and pressure):<br />

8 × 32 mm, 3.4 g<br />

EEG + GPS: 66 × 36 × 18 mm, 35g<br />

Argos + temperature sensor: 7.5 × 24 mm,<br />

antenna 200 mm, 5 g<br />

Argos + GPS + Temperature + activity:<br />

64 × 23 × 16.5 mm, antenna 178 mm, 22g<br />

Vi<strong>de</strong>o AVED + VHF: 14 g<br />

6 months<br />

1 year<br />

< 47 hours<br />

Up to months <strong>de</strong>pending on data<br />

acquisition and retrieval procedures<br />

Up to 3 years<br />

Ten minutes<br />

together both location, physiological and environmental data from various<br />

sensors and to transmit the stored data via a VHF radio or a satellite data relay<br />

network. RFID : RadioFrequency IDentification ; VHF : Very High Frequency ;<br />

GPS : global positioning system ; PTT : Plat<strong>for</strong>m Terminal Transmitter ; GLS :<br />

Global Location Sensing, AVEDs : animal-borne vi<strong>de</strong>o and environmental data<br />

collection systems.


50 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Figure 2: Use of passive radiofrequency i<strong>de</strong>ntification (RFID) tags <strong>for</strong> <strong>de</strong>mographic<br />

studies of small mammals. A. Subcutaneous injection of a RFID tag on the back of<br />

a juvenile root vole (Microtus oeconomus). B, C. Custom ma<strong>de</strong> rea<strong>de</strong>r connected to<br />

a battery and an antenna, tube-shaped single coil antenna placed on the ground.<br />

© J.-F. Le Galliard.<br />

the signal and reemits at a doubled frequency that can be picked up by<br />

the receiver antenna. Two different transmitter-receiver systems are used<br />

to <strong>de</strong>tect the tags (see figure 3). The first is a hand-held unit, originally<br />

<strong>de</strong>signed to locate avalanche victims who wear tags on their clothes (e.g.<br />

Recco). This system is efficient to locate more or less 10cm tags from 50m<br />

above ground, less than 10 m on the ground and about 10cm below the<br />

ground surface (Mascanzoni and Wallin, 1986; o’Neal et al., 2005). The<br />

second, a ground-based scanning station, uses conventional radar plan<br />

position indicator technology (PPI) that gives the coordinates (range and<br />

azimuth) of the dio<strong>de</strong>s (see Riley and Smith, 2002 <strong>for</strong> a <strong>de</strong>tailed <strong>de</strong>scription).<br />

This system can be used to track smaller tags (more than 1cm) on


Part I – Chapter 2 51<br />

horizontal landscapes (Cant et al., 2005; ovaskainen et al., 2008) or <strong>for</strong><br />

vertical looking up to 900m (Riley et al., 2007).<br />

The advantages of the harmonic radar system are multiple. Since tags are<br />

passive and do not require batteries, they have a potentially unlimited<br />

lifespan, their weight can be very low (down to a few milligrams), and<br />

they are rather cheap (less than 1€). However, this system also presents<br />

drawbacks. All dio<strong>de</strong>s reemit at the same frequency. There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>for</strong> studies<br />

that need to individually i<strong>de</strong>ntify the target, a complementary method<br />

is required (e.g. a visual mark to i<strong>de</strong>ntify the individual once found). In<br />

addition, the radar signals can be absorbed or disturbed by landscape<br />

components that may work as barriers or reemit a background noise. The<br />

best per<strong>for</strong>mances have been obtained with PPI in agricultural landscapes<br />

(Cant et al., 2005; Ovaskainen et al., 2008) but this was achieved with the<br />

use of a heavy and complex system ma<strong>de</strong> out of a trailer, which is often<br />

uneasy to use in the field. Finally, the external antenna of the <strong>de</strong>vice can<br />

hin<strong>de</strong>r the movements of individuals, especially <strong>for</strong> ground-dwelling species,<br />

and it also complicates the fixation process (Langkil<strong>de</strong> and Al<strong>for</strong>d,<br />

2002; o’Neal et al., 2005; Pellet et al., 2006).<br />

Figure 3: Use of harmonic radar to track flying insects. Left to right, a tag attached<br />

on a honeybee (from Riley et al., 2007), the ground-based scanning station used to<br />

track flying insects (from ovaskainen et al., 2008). © J.R. Riley/outlooks on Pest<br />

Management, © O. Ovaskainen.<br />

To summarise, harmonic radars represent one of the most promising<br />

opportunities to study movements on small spatial scales <strong>for</strong> small species,<br />

but only a limited number of research groups were able to use this


52 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

technology and few succee<strong>de</strong>d on other fauna than flying insects (Lovei<br />

et al., 1997; Langkli<strong>de</strong> and Al<strong>for</strong>d, 2002; O’Neal et al., 2005; Pellet et<br />

al., 2006). Technical advances are still necessary to improve the per<strong>for</strong>mances<br />

of these radars and to extend the field of investigations to new species<br />

and various ecological problems. Harmonic radars provi<strong>de</strong> to date<br />

the best method to track very small animals (Chapman et al., 2011), but<br />

their use may require complex equipments that are not necessarily easy to<br />

implement un<strong>de</strong>r field conditions. Another major drawback of this system<br />

is that tracking simultaneously several individuals is difficult because<br />

signals from different individuals can not be differentiated.<br />

3. 3. VHF radio tracking of small species<br />

Very high frequency (VHF, 30-300MHz) radio tracking systems consist of<br />

three parts: i) an emitter attached to an animal; ii) an antenna that picks<br />

up the signal sent by the emitter; iii) a receiver, to which the antenna<br />

is plugged, that <strong>de</strong>co<strong>de</strong>s the signal to the operator. The antenna can be<br />

located on a car or hand held. The closer the orientation of the antenna<br />

is to the direction of the signal, the stronger the signal is received. The<br />

strength of the signal is used to calculate the location of the monitored<br />

animal using triangulation. VHF radio tracking (also called radio telemetry)<br />

has been used to monitor large animals since the early 1960s (e.g. large<br />

carnivores or large mammals, Lemunyan et al., 1959), because the size<br />

of the first emitters preclu<strong>de</strong>d its use on smaller species. Miniaturisation<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>ts have then allowed the application of the system on smaller species,<br />

e.g. bats and birds. The smallest emitters currently available weigh circa<br />

0.2g, allowing thus the monitoring of species as small as arthropods, small<br />

reptiles and amphibians (e.g. Naef-Daenzer et al., 2005, Rock and Cree,<br />

2008). For example, recent advances in radio telemetry allowed tracking<br />

movements of a Neotropical orchid bee, which is a small insect pollinator<br />

(Wikelski et al., 2010, see figure 4). This technology provi<strong>de</strong>d new and<br />

valuable knowledge to un<strong>de</strong>rstand the <strong>ecology</strong> and evolution of pollination<br />

of orchids.<br />

However, the miniaturisation also comes at a cost since the duration of<br />

the miniaturised emitter is generally short (i.e. a few days to a few weeks<br />

<strong>for</strong> emitters < 1g), and the range of <strong>de</strong>tectability of the emitter (i.e. the<br />

maximum distance at which the signal can be <strong>de</strong>tected by the antennareceptor<br />

system) is reduced to a few hundred meters <strong>for</strong> emitters < 1g<br />

compared to several kilometres <strong>for</strong> the biggest emitters assuming groundto-ground<br />

conditions where the signal from an emitter on the ground<br />

picked up by a hand-held antenna. In the study by Wikelski et al. (2010)<br />

cited above, the lifespan of the emitters was around 10 days, which preclu<strong>de</strong>d,<br />

<strong>for</strong> example, to draw firm conclusions on the size of the home


Part I – Chapter 2 53<br />

ranges of the bees. Yet, the monitoring of the signal of fast moving animal<br />

can be improved by <strong>de</strong>tecting the signal from the air with mobile<br />

antenna installed on e.g. an helicopter or with a fixed network of antenna<br />

installed on towers (Kays et al., 2011, Wikelski et al., 2010). For example,<br />

an automated radio telemetry system was built from receivers mounted<br />

on 40m towers topped with arrays of directional antennas and was later<br />

used to track the activity and location of radio-collared animals in a tropical<br />

rain<strong>for</strong>est (Kays et al., 2011; IV, 2) This automated plat<strong>for</strong>m can be<br />

installed on a permanent study plot <strong>for</strong> long-term monitoring of medium<br />

and large sized animals, but the system encounters difficulties when it<br />

comes to <strong>de</strong>tect activity and movements of the smallest species (around<br />

4-100g., Kays et al., 2011). Thus, there is <strong>de</strong>finitely room <strong>for</strong> technological<br />

improvements of radio tracking systems <strong>for</strong> most juveniles of the small<br />

species still cannot be fitted with emitters, and because the lifespan of the<br />

smallest emitters preclu<strong>de</strong>s any long-term monitoring of individuals and<br />

reduces long range <strong>de</strong>tection.<br />

Figure 4: VHF tracking of small species. The transmitter (300mg) is glued to the<br />

bee thorax. © C. Ziegler from Wikelski et al. (2010).<br />

3. 4. Satellite-based tracking <strong>for</strong> small species<br />

Satellite-based telemetry like Argos system utilises a plat<strong>for</strong>m transmitter<br />

terminal (PTT) attached to the animal that transmits an ultra high<br />

frequency (UHF, 300-3000MHz) signal by pulses according to pre-programmed<br />

time laps. This UHF signal can be <strong>de</strong>tected by more than one<br />

of the satellites from the Argos network when these satellites pass over the<br />

tags. During this measurement window lasting a few minutes, the satellites<br />

can calculate the animal’s location based on the Doppler effect (i.e.,<br />

the shift in pulse radio frequency due to the movement of the satellite


54 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

relative to the tag) and the satellite then relays this in<strong>for</strong>mation to receiving-interpreting<br />

sites located on the ground like the Argos system data<br />

processing centres. Satellites network from the Argos system allow theoretically<br />

locating a PTT anywhere on the earth with an accuracy of about<br />

150 meters (Wikelski et al., 2007; Bridge et al., 2011).<br />

For <strong>de</strong>termination of more accurate locations down to a few meters, a<br />

GPS (global positioning system) can be installed on the animal. The GPS<br />

tag sends an UHF signal to a specific satellites network different from<br />

the Argos satellite constellation. These satellites return then the signal to<br />

the tag which calculates its own position by trilateration. The number of<br />

location records per unit time is pre-programmed by users and data are<br />

then sent to a satellite relay and available using an internet interface <strong>for</strong><br />

example (e.g. the Argos network). This GPS technology is more precise<br />

than direct telemetry by the Argos system (less than 10m accuracy) and<br />

now Argos <strong>de</strong>vices often integrate a GPS tag that sends locations within<br />

the Argos transmission. However, the GPS system coupled to the Argos<br />

relay is also more energy-consuming, especially <strong>for</strong> real-time location.<br />

Thus, GPS <strong>de</strong>vices require powerful batteries and have a relatively shorter<br />

lifespan than PTT <strong>de</strong>vices of the same weight. Currently, the smallest<br />

available Argos transmitter weights approximately 5g, while the smallest<br />

<strong>de</strong>vice <strong>for</strong> Argos satellite-relay GPS tracking weights 22g with a maximum<br />

lifespan of several months <strong>de</strong>pending on the frequency of data sampling<br />

and retrieval (Guil<strong>for</strong>d et al., 2011, see table 1). There<strong>for</strong>e, the use of satellite-based<br />

tracking technologies is still restricted to animals weighting<br />

more than 100g especially when it comes to research projects that require<br />

long-term tracking data (Wilkeski et al., 2007). To fulfill the lack of technology<br />

applicable to smaller animals, the Icarus initiative, abbreviation of<br />

the International cooperation <strong>for</strong> animal research using space hea<strong>de</strong>d by<br />

Martin Wikelski at the Max Planck Institute in Germany, aims at establishing<br />

a remote sensing plat<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> tracking over large spatial scales<br />

with transmitters as small as 1g (www.icarusinitiative.org). The project<br />

will require the <strong>de</strong>ployment of low orbit altitu<strong>de</strong> satellites to track the<br />

weak UHF signals of low weight transmitters located on the ground. A<br />

test of the method using an antenna attached to the International space<br />

station will start by 2014.<br />

An alternative to the very energy-consuming GPS tracking in real time is<br />

GPS data logging, where location data are stored locally on the tag attached<br />

to the animal. Several manufacturers <strong>de</strong>velop GPS data loggers <strong>for</strong> wildlife<br />

tracking with a total weight starting at values as small as 2 grams and<br />

with an accuracy within 2.5m <strong>for</strong> on-ground measurements (table 1). The<br />

main limitation of these small GPS loggers is that the retrieval of the data<br />

requires recapturing the animals to download from the data logger. Thus,<br />

some of these <strong>de</strong>vices also allow downloading the location data using


Part I – Chapter 2 55<br />

remote communication via satellites or via VHF, which brings the total<br />

weight of the equipment up to about respectively 15g and 30g. In addition,<br />

solar panels can be used to power the GPS directly in direct sunlight<br />

and to charge the battery of the logger. This technology helps reduce the<br />

weight of the battery while at the same time increasing the overall lifetime<br />

possibly up to several years and increasing the capacity to collect more<br />

location data. Nevertheless, the solar panels also cause some overload and<br />

the smallest available <strong>de</strong>vices of this type weigh approximately 5g, which<br />

is still too heavy to fit on numerous small animal species. Irrespective of<br />

the method used (satellite Argos PTT or GPS tracking), another important<br />

limiting factor of positioning systems using satellites is that marine species<br />

cannot be tracked during the diving phase because the UHF signal used<br />

<strong>for</strong> satellite communication propagates badly in the sea <strong>de</strong>pths.<br />

3. 5. Bio-logging <strong>for</strong> small species<br />

More complex environmental and physiological parameters can be<br />

collected with the help of various types of data loggers (see table 1).<br />

Autonomous bio-loggers like data storage tags and iButton® <strong>de</strong>vices can<br />

be set up on some small animals because of their relatively low weight<br />

(around 2g), but the data from these loggers cannot be retrieved from a<br />

distance. Animals must there<strong>for</strong>e be recaptured to upload the data, which<br />

may be time-consuming and difficult to practice un<strong>de</strong>r field conditions.<br />

For example, the iButton thermal loggers were used to gather data on<br />

body temperatures of small reptiles in the laboratory because these loggers<br />

are small and cheap (Lovegrove, 2009; Robert and Thompson, 2003).<br />

Similar thermal data can be obtained by using temperature-sensitive passive<br />

integrated transpon<strong>de</strong>rs. In addition to this, data storage tags offer<br />

the possibility to measure a great variety of parameters including light<br />

intensity, tilt, pressure, <strong>de</strong>pth, magnetic field strength, pitch and roll, conductivity,<br />

dissolved oxygen, pH, electroencephalograms, electrocardiograms,<br />

or electromyograms (Walsh and Morgan, 2004; Van <strong>de</strong>r Kooij et<br />

al., 2007; Jonsson et al., 2010) with minimum weights starting at approximately<br />

several grams. For example, a 3.4 g archival tag allows to measure<br />

both temperature and pressure during a minimum period of one year<br />

(table 1). However, more integrated and complex systems become inevitably<br />

heavier. For example, a neurologger used in combinaison with a GPS<br />

has been <strong>de</strong>veloped by Vyssotski et al. (2008) to analyse the neuronal<br />

activity of navigating homing pigeons and weights 35 grams.<br />

Data loggers combined with GPS, VHF or satellite transmitters are essential<br />

to our un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of the behaviour of large animals (see I, 1) since<br />

these technologies offer the possibility to correlate location or movement<br />

with various bio-physical and physiological parameters (Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt


56 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

and Wilson, 2005). Yet, these loggers can be difficult to mount on small<br />

animals due to their large volume and their weight typically larger than<br />

10-20g, which is the minimum weight <strong>for</strong> a current GPS data logger (see<br />

section 3.4 above). When the sole focus is on location, geolocators (or<br />

GLS logging) can provi<strong>de</strong> an alternative lightweight technology <strong>for</strong> tracking<br />

individual movements on large spatial scales. The method consists to<br />

measure ambient light level during the day from which sunset and sunrise<br />

times are estimated from thresholds in light curves. The latitu<strong>de</strong> and<br />

longitu<strong>de</strong> are then <strong>de</strong>rived from characteristics of daytime light cycles.<br />

Archival GLS loggers are now as small as 0.5g and can be fitted on small<br />

animal species, but the main limitations against the <strong>de</strong>ployment of this<br />

technique are that i) animals must be recaptured to retrieve the data and<br />

ii) the accuracy of the measurements is rarely better than 100 km (Phillips<br />

et al., 2004). Nevertheless, this technology is a<strong>de</strong>quate <strong>for</strong> tracking sea<br />

birds, migratory passerines or pelagic species (e.g. marine mammals, penguins)<br />

in or<strong>de</strong>r to <strong>de</strong>termine long-distance movements, breeding season<br />

<strong>for</strong>aging ranges or broad-scale habitat preference from several months to<br />

multiple years.<br />

In addition to this range of bio-loggers, animal-borne vi<strong>de</strong>o and environmental<br />

data collection systems (AVEDs) have been used <strong>for</strong> a long time to<br />

study large marine or terrestrial species (Moll et al., 2007), and have been<br />

recently upgra<strong>de</strong>d to be suitable <strong>for</strong> a wi<strong>de</strong>r range of smaller species (Rutz<br />

and Bluff, 2008). For example, a <strong>de</strong>vice weighting about 14g and adapted<br />

to crows seems promising to collect animals’ eye view of resource use and<br />

social interactions along a known movement trajectory. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately,<br />

the system is still too heavy to fit on many small species and its current<br />

recording capacity does not exceed 1 hour. Advances are obviously necessary<br />

to improve the per<strong>for</strong>mances of this technology and to extend the<br />

field of investigations to smaller mo<strong>de</strong>l species.<br />

4. Designing the future generation of sensors<br />

<strong>for</strong> small animals<br />

Our comparative analysis of available sensors highlights that current systems<br />

present major limits. The first one is that even basic sensors constitute<br />

a real bur<strong>de</strong>n <strong>for</strong> the small animals that have to carry them. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

the main technical challenge is the miniaturisation of the components.<br />

An extra challenge is that this miniaturisation must be done without too<br />

much loss of capacity in the number of measured parameters, autonomy,<br />

or <strong>de</strong>tectability. Another necessary improvement is to <strong>de</strong>velop compatible<br />

fixation procedures. For large animals, various techniques (including glues,<br />

harnesses, subcutaneous or intraperitoneal implants, or ingestible tags) have


Part I – Chapter 2 57<br />

been experimented to attach the animal-borne <strong>de</strong>vice with a minimum hindrance.<br />

However, ecologists who work on small species must often <strong>de</strong>velop<br />

their own attachment techniques and materials since few standard are available<br />

or adapted to their mo<strong>de</strong>ls, and this process generally adds annoyances<br />

to a bur<strong>de</strong>n yet significant. The miniaturisation of sensors and associated<br />

equipments could limit this problem; however, technological advancements<br />

<strong>for</strong> harmless and weakly invasive fixation techniques are necessary. In addition,<br />

to address further questions in the field of animal <strong>ecology</strong>, we may<br />

wish to obtain novel kinds of in<strong>for</strong>mation. This could be done by combining<br />

the “classical” data obtained with standard animal-borne sensors with<br />

new data obtained from other environmental sensors. In particular, a wi<strong>de</strong><br />

range of techniques are now available to assess the thermal environments<br />

(thermal imagery techniques, Lavers et al., 2005; Hristov et al., 2008), the<br />

weight of individuals (<strong>for</strong> automatic measurement of growth, body mass<br />

regulation and feeding activity, Rands et al., 2006), or the acoustic environment<br />

(<strong>for</strong> characterisation of behaviour and social interactions, see chapter<br />

by Huetz and Aubin). With such an integration in mind, the next generation<br />

of sensors <strong>for</strong> small animals will there<strong>for</strong>e allow investigating more<br />

accurately the internal and external factors influencing the responses of<br />

organisms to environmental variations.<br />

Authors’ references<br />

Olivier Guillaume, Jean Clobert:<br />

Station d’Écologie Expérimentale du CNRS à Moulis, CNRS USR 2936,<br />

Moulis, Saint-Girons, France<br />

Aurélie Coulon:<br />

Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Département Écologie et Gestion<br />

<strong>de</strong> la Biodiversité, Unité Conservation <strong>de</strong>s Espèces, Restauration et <strong>Suivi</strong><br />

<strong>de</strong>s Populations (CERSP), MNHN-CNRS UMR 7204, Brunoy, France<br />

Jean-François Le Galliard:<br />

Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Laboratoire Écologie et Évolution,<br />

CNRS UMR 7625 Paris, France<br />

École Normale Supérieure, Centre <strong>de</strong> recherche en écologie expérimentale<br />

et prédictive (CEREEP) – Ecotron Ile <strong>de</strong> France, CNRS UMS 3194,<br />

St-Pierre-Lès-Nemours, France<br />

Corresponding author: Olivier Guillaume, olivier.guillaume@EcoExmoulis.cnrs.fr


58 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

Jean-François Le Galliard acknowledges the support of the ANR grant<br />

Extinction (07-JCJC-0120) and a Marie Curie Fellowship.<br />

References<br />

Bedrosian B., Craighead D., 2007. Evaluation of techniques <strong>for</strong> attaching<br />

transmitters to common raven nestlings. Northwestern Naturalist, 88,<br />

pp. 1-6.<br />

Bergman P. K., Haw F., Blankenship H. L., Buckley R. M., 1992. Perspectives<br />

on <strong>de</strong>sign, use and misuse of fish tags. Fisheries, 17, pp. 20-25.<br />

Blackburn T. M., Gaston K. J., 1994. The distribution of body sizes of the<br />

world’s bird species. Oikos, 70, pp. 127-130.<br />

Bolnick D. I., Svanback R., Fordyce J. A., Yang L. H., Davis J. M., Hulsey C. D.,<br />

Forister M. L., 2003. The <strong>ecology</strong> of individuals: inci<strong>de</strong>nce and implications<br />

of individual specialization. American naturalist, 161, pp. 1-28.<br />

Bridge E. S., Thorup K., Bowlin M. S., Chilson P. B., Diehl R. H., Fléron<br />

R. W., Hartl P., Kays R., Kelly J. F., Robinson W. D., Wilkeski M., 2011.<br />

Technology on the move: recent and <strong>for</strong>thcoming innovations <strong>for</strong> tracking<br />

migratory birds. BioScience, 61, pp. 689-698.<br />

Bridger C. J., Booth R. K., 2003. The effects of biotelemetry transmitter<br />

presence and attachment procedures on fish physiology and behaviour.<br />

Review in Fisheries sciences, 11, pp. 13-34.<br />

Canner J. E., Spence M. 2011. A new technique using metal tags to track small<br />

seeds over short distances. Ecological Research, 26, pp. 233-236.<br />

Cant E. T., Smith A. D., Reynolds D. R., Osborne J. L. 2005. Tracking butterfly<br />

flights with harmonic radar across the landscape. Proceedings of the Royal<br />

society B, 272, 785-790.<br />

Chapman J. W., Drake V. A. Reynolds D. R., 2011. Recent insights from radar<br />

studies of insect flight. Annual Review of Entomology, 56, pp. 337-356.<br />

Clobert J., Danchin E., Dhondt A. A., Nichols J. D., 2001. Dispersal. Ox<strong>for</strong>d<br />

University Press, Ox<strong>for</strong>d.<br />

Cochran W. W., 1980. Wildlife telemetry, in: Schemnitz S.D. (Ed.), Wildlife<br />

management techniques manual, 4th ed., Wildlife Society, Washington<br />

DC, pp. 507-520.<br />

Courtney D. L., Mortensen D. G., Orsi J. A., Munk K. M., 2000. Origin of<br />

juvenile Pacific salmon recovered from coastal southeastern Alaska<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntified by otolith thermal marks and co<strong>de</strong>d wire tags. Fisheries<br />

Research, 46, pp. 267-278.<br />

Gar<strong>de</strong>zi T., Da Silva J., 1999. Diversity in relation to body size in mammals:<br />

A comparative study. American Naturalist, 153, pp. 110-123.


Part I – Chapter 2 59<br />

Gibbons J.W., Andrews K. M., 2004. PIT tagging: simple technology at its best.<br />

Bioscience, 54, pp. 447-454.<br />

Guil<strong>for</strong>d T., Äkesson S., Gagliardo A, Holland R. A., Mouritsen H., Muheim R.,<br />

Wiltschko R., Wiltschko W., Bingman V. P., 2011. Migratory navigation in<br />

birds: new opportunities in an era of fast-<strong>de</strong>veloping tracking technology.<br />

Journal of Experimental Biology, 214, pp. 3705-3712.<br />

Hoset K. S., Le Galliard J.-F., Gun<strong>de</strong>rsen G., Steen H., 2008. Home range size<br />

and overlap in female root voles: effects of season and <strong>de</strong>nsity. Behavioural<br />

Ecology, 19, pp. 139-145.<br />

Hristov N. I., Betke M., Kuntz T. H., 2008. Applications of thermal infrared<br />

imaging <strong>for</strong> research in aero<strong>ecology</strong>. Integrative and Comparative Biology,<br />

48, pp. 50-59.<br />

Jonsson G. K., Thorsteinsson V., Tomasson G. G., 2010. I<strong>de</strong>ntification of vertical<br />

and horizontal movement patterns in cod behavior in Spink A.J., Grieco<br />

F., Krips O.E., Loijens L.W.S., Noldus L.P.J.J. , Zimmerman P.H. (Eds),<br />

Proceedings of Measuring Behavior 2010, 7th International Conference on<br />

Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research, Eindhoven, pp. 303-305.<br />

Kays R., Tilak S., Crofoot M., Fountain T., obando D., ortega A., Kuemmeth F.,<br />

Man<strong>de</strong>l J., Swenson G., Lambert T., Hirsch B., Wikelski M., 2011. Tracking<br />

animal location and activity with an automated radio telemetry system in a<br />

tropical rain<strong>for</strong>est. The Computer Journal, 54, pp. 1-17<br />

Korslund L., Steen H., 2006. Small ro<strong>de</strong>nt winter survival: snow conditions<br />

limit access to food resources. Journal of Animal <strong>ecology</strong>, 75, pp. 156-166.<br />

Langkil<strong>de</strong> T., Al<strong>for</strong>d R., 2002. The tail wags the frog: harmonic radar<br />

transpon<strong>de</strong>rs affect movement behaviour in Litoria lesueuri. Journal of<br />

Herpetology, 36, pp. 711-715.<br />

Lavers C., Franks K., Floyd M., Plowman A., 2005. Application of remote<br />

thermal imaging and night vision technology to improve endangered<br />

wildlife resource management with minimal animal distress and hazard to<br />

humans. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 15, pp. 207-212.<br />

Le Galliard J.-F., Gun<strong>de</strong>rsen, G., Steen H., 2007. Mother-offspring interactions<br />

do not affect natal dispersal in a small ro<strong>de</strong>nt. Behavioural Ecology, 18,<br />

pp. 665-673.<br />

Le Galliard J.-F., Paquet M., Pantelic Z., Perret S., 2011. Effects of miniature<br />

transpon<strong>de</strong>rs on physiological stress, locomotor activity, growth and<br />

survival in small lizards. Amphibia-Reptilia, 32, pp. 177-183.<br />

Lemunyan C. D., White W. M., Nyberg E., Christian J. J., 1959. Design of a<br />

miniature radio transmitter <strong>for</strong> use in animal studies. Journal of Wildlife<br />

Management, 23, pp. 107-110.<br />

Lovegrove B. G., 2009. Modification and miniaturization of thermochron<br />

Ibuttons <strong>for</strong> surgical implantation into small animals. Journal of<br />

Comparative Physiology B, 179, pp. 451-458.<br />

Lovëi G. L., Stringer I. A. N., Devine C. D., Cartellieri M., 1997. Harmonic<br />

radar – A method using inexpensive tags to study invertebrate movement<br />

on land. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 21, pp. 187-193.


60 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Mascanzoni D., Wallin H., 1986. The harmonic radar: a new method of tracing<br />

insects in the field. Ecological Entomology, 11, pp. 387-390.<br />

Moll R. J., Millspaugh J. J., Beringer J., Sartwell J., He Z., 2007. A new ‘view’ of<br />

<strong>ecology</strong> and conservation through animal-borne vi<strong>de</strong>o systems. Trends in<br />

Ecology and Evolution, 22, pp. 660-668.<br />

Naef-Daenzer B., Früh D., Stal<strong>de</strong>r M., Welti P., Weise E., 2005. Miniaturization<br />

(0.2g) and evaluation of attachment techniques of telemetry transmitters.<br />

Journal of Experimental biology, 208, pp4063-4068.<br />

O’Neal M. E., Landis D. A., Rothwell E., Kempel L., Reihard D., 2005. Tracking<br />

insects with harmonic radar: a case study. American Entomologist, 50,<br />

pp. 212-218.<br />

Ovaskainen O., Smith A. D., Osborne J. L., Reynolds, D. R., Carreck, N. L.,<br />

Martin A. P., Niitepold K., Hanski I., 2008. Tracking butterfly movements<br />

with harmonic radr reveals an effect of population age on movement<br />

distance. Proceedings of the National aca<strong>de</strong>my of sciences of the USA, 49,<br />

pp. 19090-19095.<br />

Pellet J., Reichsteiner L., Skrivervik A., Zurcher J.-F., Perrin N., 2006. Use of<br />

the harmonic radar direction fin<strong>de</strong>r to study the terrestrial habitats of the<br />

european tree frog (Hyla arborea). Amphibia-Reptilia, 27, pp. 138-142.<br />

Phillips R. A., Silk J. R. D., Croxall, J. P., Afanasyev, V., Briggs, D. R., 2004.<br />

Accuracy of geolocation estimates <strong>for</strong> flying seabirds. Marine Ecology<br />

Progress Series, 266, pp. 265-272.<br />

Rands S. A., Houston A. I., Cuthill I. C., 2006. Measurement of mass change in<br />

breeding birds: a bibliography and discussion of measurement techniques.<br />

Ecology, 23, pp. 1-5.<br />

Riley J. R., Chapman J. W., Reynolds D. R., Smith A. D., 2007. Recent<br />

applications of radar to entomology. Outlooks on Pest Management, 18,<br />

pp. 62-68.<br />

Riley J. R., Smith A. D., 2002. Design consi<strong>de</strong>rations <strong>for</strong> an harmonic radar to<br />

investigate the flight of insects at low altitu<strong>de</strong>. Computers and Electronics<br />

in Agriculture, 35, pp. 151-169.<br />

Robert K.A., Thompson M.B., 2003. Reconstructing thermochron ibuttons to<br />

reduce size and weight as a new technique in the study of small animal<br />

thermal biology. Herpetological Review, 34, pp. 130-132.<br />

Rock J., Cree A., 2008. Extreme variation in body temperature in a nocturnal<br />

thigmothermic lizard. Herpetological Journal, 18, pp. 69-76.<br />

Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt Y., Wilson R. P., 2005. Trends and perspectives in animalattached<br />

remote sensing. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3,<br />

pp. 437-444.<br />

Rutz C. G., Bluff L. A., 2008. Animal-borne imaging takes wing, or the<br />

dawn of ‘Wildlife vi<strong>de</strong>o-tracking’. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23,<br />

pp. 292-294.<br />

Van <strong>de</strong>r Kooij J., Righton D., Strand E., Michalsen K., Thorsteinsson V.,<br />

Svedäng H., Neat F.C., Neuenfeldt S., 2007. Life un<strong>de</strong>r pressure: insights


Part I – Chapter 2 61<br />

from electronic data-storage tags into cod swimblad<strong>de</strong>r function. ICES<br />

Journal of Marine Science, 64, pp. 1293-1301.<br />

Vyssotski A. L., Serkov A. N., Itskov P. M., Dell’Omo G., Latanov A. V.,<br />

Wolfer D. P.,Lipp. H. P., 2006. Miniature neurologgers <strong>for</strong> flying Pigeons:<br />

multichannel EEG and Action and field potentials in combination with<br />

GPS Recording. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95, pp. 1263-1273.<br />

Walsh S. J., Morgan M. J., 2004. Observations of natural behaviour of yellowtail<br />

floun<strong>de</strong>r <strong>de</strong>rived from data storage tags. ICES Journal of Marine science,<br />

61, pp. 1151-1156.<br />

Weatherhead P. J., Blouin-Demers G., 2004. Long-term effect of radiotelemetry<br />

on black ratsnakes. Wildlife Society Bulletinn, 32, pp. 900-906.<br />

Whid<strong>de</strong>n S. E., Williams C. T., Breton A. R., Buck C. L., 2007. Effects of<br />

transmitters on the reproductive success of Tufted Puffins. Journal of Field<br />

Ornithology, 78, pp. 206-212.<br />

Wikelski, M., Kays, R.W., Kasdin, N.J., Thorup, K., Smith, J.A., Swenson, G.W.,<br />

2007. Going wild: what a global small-animal tracking system could do <strong>for</strong><br />

experimental biologists. Journal of Experimental Biology 210 (2), 181-186.<br />

Wikelski M., Moxley J., Eaton-Mordas A., López-Uribe M. M., Holland R.,<br />

Moskowitz D., Roubik D. W., Kays R., 2010. Large-range movements of<br />

neotropical orchid bees observed via radio telemetry. PLoS One, 5, pp. 6.


Chapter 3<br />

Passive hydro-acoustics <strong>for</strong> cetacean<br />

census and localisation<br />

Flore Samaran, Nadège Gandilhon, Rocio Prieto Gonzalez, Fe<strong>de</strong>rica Pace,<br />

Amy Kennedy, and Olivier Adam<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Scientific observations of cetacean species (whales, dolphins, and relatives)<br />

are nowadays intensively collected by biologists <strong>for</strong> several purposes: i<strong>de</strong>ntifying<br />

the species to monitor their population, locating individuals to collect<br />

data on the abundance and seasonal distribution of each species, obtaining<br />

<strong>de</strong>tailed in<strong>for</strong>mation about individuals (e.g. individual behaviour, food<br />

and health) and <strong>de</strong>scribing interactions among individuals (social group<br />

relationships, cross-species interaction). These observations are critical to<br />

measure the impacts of anthropogenic activities (e.g. un<strong>de</strong>rwater noise,<br />

ship strikes, fishery tools and bycatch) on populations and communities<br />

of cetaceans. Recently, Simmonds and Isaac (2007) and Simmonds and<br />

Eliott (2009) suggested to use whale observations to inclu<strong>de</strong> relevant indicators<br />

in prediction mo<strong>de</strong>ls that <strong>de</strong>scribe the global warming of the planet.<br />

Odontocetes are top predators and mysticetes eat krill. Global warming<br />

will impact their alimentary resources since we know, <strong>for</strong> example, that<br />

krill mass is <strong>de</strong>creasing in the Austral ocean. Moreover, some species use<br />

hot-spots <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>aging and breeding. Observations of changes in the use of<br />

these hot-spots by cetaceans will give further insights into changes of their<br />

environment.


64 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Figure 1: Common observation methods <strong>for</strong> cetaceans. These methods inclu<strong>de</strong><br />

visual approaches by human observers, animal-borne sensors (I, 1), genetic methods<br />

and acoustic tools. The methods allow to obtain <strong>de</strong>mographic, behavioural and<br />

genetic in<strong>for</strong>mation. © Gandilhon/Breach, © Kennedy/NMML.<br />

There are several methods available to observe and collect scientific data on<br />

cetaceans (figure 1). A classical and often-used method is based on visual<br />

observations, when cetaceans are i<strong>de</strong>ntified by sight from a distance by a<br />

trained human observer. This technique is simple and trained observers can<br />

easily i<strong>de</strong>ntify species, count the number of individuals or even i<strong>de</strong>ntify individuals<br />

within a group using photo-i<strong>de</strong>ntification techniques. Behavioural<br />

observations can also be conducted with this technique. However, this<br />

approach has also some drawbacks, such as the <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce on weather and<br />

availability of observation sites (shore, boat, etc), the impossibility to collect<br />

data at night, and the potential bias from the observers. Another and<br />

more advanced solution to observe and collect scientific data on cetaceans<br />

is to use automatic animal-borne sensors. This approach is newer and faces<br />

numerous technical challenges, including, <strong>for</strong> example, the need <strong>for</strong> sensors<br />

able to resist pressure differentials due to the water <strong>de</strong>pth, and autonomous<br />

enough in terms of power supply and data storage (see chapter I, 1).<br />

We <strong>de</strong>scribe the principles and challenges of advanced <strong>de</strong>tection methods<br />

based on passive acoustics monitoring (PAM). PAM consists in passively<br />

listening to the sounds emitted by animals. It is an attractive alternative to<br />

classical visual observations because cetaceans are vocally active and their<br />

sound can travel far un<strong>de</strong>rwater (Samaran et al., 2010b). In addition, species


Part I – Chapter 3 65<br />

of cetaceans can be <strong>de</strong>tected remotely, according to the main features of<br />

their sounds (acoustic intensity, bandwidth), the acoustic propagation and<br />

the ambient noise level. Note that the extraction of individual acoustic signature<br />

is still a scientific challenge. The first step with acoustic methods<br />

consists in choosing the right electronic instrumentation to make recordings<br />

(hydrophone, amplifier, filters, data acquisition board, data transmission,<br />

storage unit). The following steps are <strong>de</strong>dicated to signal processing<br />

and pattern recognition to <strong>de</strong>tect cetacean sounds in the recordings, to<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntify, date, and localise species observations, and estimate the number of<br />

individuals. These acoustic events can then be used by biologists to map the<br />

presence of even distribution (locations). The diversity of sounds produced<br />

by cetaceans is overviewed in the first part of this chapter. Then, a <strong>de</strong>tailed<br />

account of the technological solutions to record and to analyse these sounds<br />

<strong>for</strong> the purpose of ecological studies of cetaceans is presented. Lastly, the<br />

application of these techniques is illustrated with case studies taken from<br />

our current projects.<br />

2. Acoustic signatures of cetaceans’ species<br />

Cetaceans are marine mammals that inclu<strong>de</strong> 83 species from two major taxonomic<br />

units named Mysticetes (cetaceans without teeth) and Odontocetes<br />

(cetaceans with teeth). Cetaceans are present in all oceans, and their conservation<br />

statuses are different according to the species (http://www.iucnredlist.org/).<br />

The sound repertoire of different cetacean species may vary<br />

from highly stereotyped repetitive sounds like the ones emitted by fin<br />

whales (Balaenoptera physalus) and the monotonous clicks of sperm whales<br />

(Physeter macrocephalus) to more complex communication calls, like those of<br />

bottlenose dolphins (Tursiop truncatus), killer whales (Orcinus orca) and humpback<br />

whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). A summary of the frequency range<br />

and source levels of sounds emitted by common cetacean species is given in<br />

table 1. These sounds are hypothesised to play a crucial role <strong>for</strong> communication<br />

among cetaceans, including group cohesion, searching <strong>for</strong> food, strategy<br />

<strong>for</strong> eating, mother-calf contact, individual recognition (acoustic signature),<br />

hunting, socialising, looking <strong>for</strong> a partner, <strong>de</strong>lineating a territory, establishing<br />

a hierarchy, <strong>de</strong>tecting predators and dangers, and orientation (Frankel, 1998).<br />

The intrinsic sound characteristics are non-linearly distorted from the<br />

acoustic propagation. Acoustic sound attenuation <strong>de</strong>pends on distance<br />

between the cetacean source and the hydrophone and is also proportional<br />

to the frequency squared. Leroy’s equation gives the attenuation coefficient<br />

α (dB/km) <strong>de</strong>pending on the frequency:<br />

( f )= 6.10 3 f 2 + 0.16 f f 2<br />

r<br />

f 2 r<br />

+ f , 2


66 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

where f (kHz) is the frequency of the acoustic wave and fr is the relaxation<br />

frequency of the boric acid B(OH) 3<br />

present in the sea water. The fr<br />

value <strong>de</strong>pends on the location and the empirical value is 1.6 kHz in the<br />

Mediterranean Sea <strong>for</strong> example.<br />

In addition, acoustic waves can be reflected at the sea surface and bottom,<br />

where the level of absorption <strong>de</strong>pends on the nature of the seabed.<br />

Furthermore, the propagation speed of the sound in seawater is not constant:<br />

it <strong>de</strong>pends importantly on salinity, pressure and temperature. All<br />

these parameters can be inclu<strong>de</strong>d in a mathematical mo<strong>de</strong>l to <strong>de</strong>scribe<br />

acoustic propagation, based on the Helmholtz equation, where P is the<br />

pressure, and c 0<br />

is the propagation speed of the sound in the seawater:<br />

2 P 1 2 P<br />

2<br />

c 0<br />

t = 0. 2<br />

For harmonic solution where P = pe i t and ω is the angular frequency<br />

(ω=2πF with F the frequency), the Helmholtz equation writes like:<br />

2 p + k 2 p = 0, with the wavenumber k = = 2 . c<br />

To solve this equation, different mathematic mo<strong>de</strong>ls and associated softwares<br />

could be applied including ray tracing (e.g. Bellhop software), normal<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>s mo<strong>de</strong>ls (e.g. Kraken software), the parabolic equation (e.g.<br />

RAM software) or the wavenumber integration (e.g. oases software). All<br />

of these can be downloa<strong>de</strong>d on the Ocean acoustic library website (http://<br />

oalib.hlsresearch.com).<br />

Table 1: Features of sounds emitted by some common cetaceans’ species<br />

(adapted from Simmonds et al., 2004). To compare, a large tanker generates<br />

low frequency noise (


Part I – Chapter 3 67<br />

The analysis of these sounds is difficult because of the presence of noise<br />

and non-linear distortion. Usually, different approaches are used to analyse<br />

vocalisations or short transient sounds (e.g. odontocete clicks, right<br />

whale gunshots). The first step consists in using the bandpass filter corresponding<br />

to the species studied, and possibly applying an enhancement of<br />

the signal if the amplifier gain is too low <strong>for</strong> the recordings. To <strong>de</strong>tect the<br />

emitted sounds, one method is to set a threshold on the temporal energy<br />

signal. The use of the Teager-Kaiser operator represents an alternative that<br />

takes into account the fact that acoustic signals vary within the same species<br />

or individual, where signal variation is given by equation:<br />

( s) = s 2 ( n) sn ( 1)sn+1<br />

( ),<br />

where s(i) is the i th sample of the recor<strong>de</strong>d signal (voltage corresponding<br />

to the acoustic pressure on the hydrophone, V/dB unit). The main advantages<br />

of this non-linear operator (in addition to its easy implementation)<br />

is that only three successive samples are nee<strong>de</strong>d to calculate Ψ. This operator,<br />

taking into account the signal variations, is used to track the instantaneous<br />

energy of the signal (<strong>for</strong> example <strong>for</strong> amplitu<strong>de</strong> modulation and<br />

frequency modulation).<br />

Parametric mo<strong>de</strong>ls as autoregressive (AR) or/and mean average (MA)<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>ls are also a solution, especially <strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>tection of vocalisations or<br />

non-stationarity in the acoustic recordings. To analyse cetacean sounds,<br />

specialists in marine biology make extensive use of the Fourier trans<strong>for</strong>m<br />

or the spectrogram <strong>for</strong> the time evolution of frequency variations. More<br />

up-to-date methods exist such as the wavelet trans<strong>for</strong>m or the Hilbert<br />

Huang trans<strong>for</strong>m (Adam, 2008).<br />

3. Acoustic observatories<br />

Passive acoustics is based on the use of at least one hydrophone to record<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rwater sounds during a given time. These recordings typically inclu<strong>de</strong><br />

a large variety of sounds such as natural sounds (waves, rain, wind…), biological<br />

sounds (fish, shrimp, coral reef…) or sounds from human activities<br />

(sonar, airgun, marine traffic…). The choice of the recording equipment<br />

<strong>de</strong>pends on several factors including the acoustic intensity and frequency<br />

bandwidth of sounds emitted by the cetacean species un<strong>de</strong>r investigation,<br />

the bathymetry of the area where it is <strong>de</strong>ployed, and the ambient<br />

noise level, including those resulting from human activities. The choice<br />

of hydrophone also <strong>de</strong>pends on the objectives of the study including the<br />

willingness to <strong>de</strong>tect one or more specific cetacean species. If the target<br />

of the study is to <strong>de</strong>tect cetaceans’ vocalisations over very long distances,<br />

the <strong>de</strong>vice will be chosen to maximise the amplitu<strong>de</strong> of the signal up to


68 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

the saturating level that may result from marine noise and the minimum<br />

amplitu<strong>de</strong> of vocalisations that are to be <strong>de</strong>tected. The solution is to<br />

record continuously and keep the whole signal in memory to provi<strong>de</strong> an<br />

a posteriori analysis. This recordings can be continuous time or during<br />

a specific period every day to optimise the memory size and the power<br />

consuming. The other solution is to process cetacean sounds immediately<br />

in situ, such that only time corresponding to cetaceans’ presence is stored<br />

in memory. This approach can save substantial energy and memory space.<br />

3.1 Instantaneous acoustic observatories<br />

Here, the objective is to make recordings from a ship. There<strong>for</strong>e, the<br />

acoustic system should be light and easily manoeuvrable. Typically, the<br />

equipments required are one or more hydrophones, their amplifier, the<br />

digital recor<strong>de</strong>r or the data acquisition board and a computer. It is possible<br />

to buy this material <strong>for</strong> 6,000 to 7,000€ <strong>for</strong> a single hydrophone (sensitivity<br />

-170dB re 1V/uPa, [10-90kHz] omnidirectionnal). Digital recor<strong>de</strong>rs<br />

can now record at 192kHz on 24 bits and it is possible to use data<br />

acquisition cards with higher sampling rates and the possibility of different<br />

synchronised channels. Instantaneous acoustic observatories are usually<br />

used <strong>for</strong> opportunistic <strong>de</strong>tections of cetaceans in a specific area. This<br />

approach may be supplemented by visual observations. The objective is to<br />

give in<strong>for</strong>mation about the cetaceans’ distribution and localise potential<br />

hot-spots in a local region. We used this approach in Gua<strong>de</strong>loupe (French<br />

West Indies) to confirm the presence of elusive species like beaked whales,<br />

and in Madagascar to record different humpback whale singers.<br />

3.2 Semi-permanent and permanent acoustic stations<br />

Semi-permanent or permanent acoustic stations are used <strong>for</strong> the purpose<br />

of monitoring a specific area (hot-spot of whale activity, a channel, a<br />

strait, or a harbour…). This system can be <strong>de</strong>ployed with a buoy at the<br />

sea surface or can be anchored on the seabed. A good example of the<br />

first case is a new prototype that we <strong>de</strong>ployed in Gua<strong>de</strong>loupe (French<br />

West Indies) around the end of 2010 (figure 2). This system was built<br />

by CeSigma (www.cesigma.com) and PLK Marine (www.plkmarine.com),<br />

and was implemented in a Fish Aggregating Device (FAD) in agreement<br />

with the fisheries committee of Gua<strong>de</strong>loupe. Technical features were a<br />

sampling frequency of 200kHz, samples co<strong>de</strong>d on 24 bits, 4 channels,<br />

and 700Gb of storage, a Wifi transmission capacity, and continuous<br />

recordings (Gandilhon et al., 2010). This so-called “sonobuoy” is used to<br />

observe different species including sperm whales, humpback whales, bottlenose<br />

dolphins, spotted dolphins, rough-toothed dolphins.


Part I – Chapter 3 69<br />

Figure 2: Design of the acoustic system <strong>de</strong>veloped by CeSigma and PLK Marine<br />

<strong>for</strong> the scientific program Gualiba I coordinated by the team “Dynamique <strong>de</strong>s<br />

écosystèmes Caraïbes” <strong>de</strong> l’Université <strong>de</strong>s Antilles et <strong>de</strong> la Guyane and the Centre<br />

<strong>de</strong> neurosciences Paris Sud of University Paris Sud orsay. The sonobuoy consists<br />

of an autonomous recording and transmission <strong>de</strong>vice connected to a hydrophone<br />

recording ocean sounds continuously.<br />

Another <strong>de</strong>vice is the autonomous un<strong>de</strong>rwater acoustic recor<strong>de</strong>r <strong>for</strong> listening,<br />

manufactured and distributed by Multi-Electronique (www.multielectronique.com).<br />

The entire system is based on a hydrophone, a data<br />

acquisition card, an external hard drive and power batteries. An acoustic<br />

latch releases the material from its anchor, back to the surface by a buoy.<br />

This type of material was used to monitor populations of great whales<br />

and some odontocetes <strong>for</strong> a year in the Mozambique Channel and on the<br />

south of Tromelin Island in the Indian Ocean. The buoy was <strong>de</strong>ployed<br />

during the mission Eparses 2009 fun<strong>de</strong>d by the Marine protected areas,<br />

Terres australes et antarctiques françaises (Taaf), Centre d’étu<strong>de</strong>s biological<br />

Chizé (CEbC-CNRS) and the Laboratoire domaines océaniques <strong>de</strong><br />

l’université <strong>de</strong> Bretagne occi<strong>de</strong>ntale (LDO-UBO). The analysis was done<br />

a posteriori to automatically <strong>de</strong>tect the cetacean sounds and extract the<br />

presence rate during the different months of the year. Other instruments<br />

of the same type have been employed since 2007 in collaboration with


70 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

the Pacific marine environment laboratory (NoAA), CNRS-CEbC, and<br />

the LDO-UBO to monitor large whales as part of the Subantarctic Indian<br />

ocean Program (see figure 3).<br />

Figure 3: Design of the autonomous hydrophone of the Pacific marine environment<br />

laboratory (NoAA) and used <strong>for</strong> the scientific mission DEFLo-HyDRo. The<br />

sample frequency of the hydrophone is 250Hz and the data is co<strong>de</strong>d 16 bits with<br />

a storage capacity of 80Go. The autonomy can be chosen from 18 to 24 months<br />

<strong>de</strong>pending on if the recordings are continuous or during a short specific period<br />

of the day (10 min recordings every 6 hours <strong>for</strong> example). © NoAA/PML Vents<br />

program/Acoustics group (http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/vents/multimedia.html).<br />

Regarding permanent observatories, marine ecologists using acoustic<br />

methods have exploited permanent infrastructures from other disciplines,<br />

like those of geophysics or physical oceanography. For example, in Europe,<br />

the ESONET project (European Seafloor Observatories NETwork, www.<br />

esonet-emso.org) brings together specialists in geophysics, chemistry,<br />

biochemistry, oceanography, marine biology and fisheries. Different<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rwater observatories are distributed all around the European coasts.<br />

In 2007, in collaboration with Prof. H. Glotin (LSIS, www.lsis.org), we<br />

proposed to add the marine mammal observation task to the neutrino<br />

<strong>de</strong>tector installed on the ANTARES observatory (http://antares.in2p3.<br />

fr) <strong>de</strong>ployed in the Mediterranean Sea (Hyères, France). The advantage of<br />

this system is that it provi<strong>de</strong>s permanent acoustic recordings throughout<br />

the whole year. The objective is to give an indication of the presence of<br />

sperm whales and fin whales even during winter, when weather conditions<br />

are not optimal <strong>for</strong> visual observations. Passive acoustics, in this case, is a<br />

unique solution to provi<strong>de</strong> this kind of in<strong>for</strong>mation of cetacean presence.<br />

There are other permanent observatories using acoustic <strong>de</strong>tectors, such as<br />

the Mars ocean observatory testbed in Monterrey Bay (www.mbari.org/<br />

mars) and the Neptune project in the Northeast Pacific ocean (www.<br />

neptune.washington.edu). The modules of these infrastructures are placed<br />

on the seabed, and power supply and data can be transmitted by a cable<br />

connected to facilities on shore. These projects have a section <strong>de</strong>dicated to<br />

marine biology and especially to cetacean observations.


Part I – Chapter 3 71<br />

4. Case studies<br />

We worked on several cetacean species and the diversity of sounds that we<br />

<strong>de</strong>alt with explains the different methods we investigated.<br />

4.1 Analysis of Sperm whale clicks<br />

Sperm whales emit two major types of clicks: regular clicks characterised<br />

by high intensities and inter-click intervals greater than 0.5ms, and creaks<br />

that are successions of clicks of variable amplitu<strong>de</strong> and spacing of less<br />

than 0.5sec. The bio-mechanic of click generation is pretty well <strong>de</strong>scribed<br />

in the literature by the mo<strong>de</strong>l first introduced by Mohl et al. (2003) and<br />

subsequently modified by Laplanche et al. (2006). However, automatic<br />

<strong>de</strong>tection of clicks can be challenging because the inter-click interval fluctuates<br />

over time, and the signal-to-noise ratio varies consi<strong>de</strong>rably according<br />

to the ambient noise and the position of the whale relative to the<br />

recording <strong>de</strong>vice (figure 4). There<strong>for</strong>e, one needs to tra<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong>tection capacity<br />

off the risks of false alarms when setting and adjusting the <strong>de</strong>tector.<br />

Figure 4: Sperm whale clicks with un<strong>de</strong>rwater noise (upper panel) <strong>de</strong>tected by using<br />

the Teager-Kaiser operator <strong>de</strong>scribed previously (lower panel). Sperm whale clicks<br />

were recor<strong>de</strong>d off the coast of Toulon (France) in August 2004. one sperm whale<br />

was presented the data shows regular clicks.


72 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Figure 5: Data retrieved from the acoustic sensing of Sperm whale clicks.<br />

A. Estimation of the Sperm whale length by measurement of the <strong>de</strong>lay between<br />

the first pulse and the second pulse. The y-axis measures the relative amplitu<strong>de</strong> of<br />

the pulse (normalized correlation between the original pulse and its reflection) and<br />

the z-axis corresponds to the number of successives clicks (here, 50 clicks). Sperm<br />

whale clicks are multipulsed signals. The first pulse comes from the “monkey lips”<br />

close to the blowhole and the other pulses come from reflections from the distal sac


Part I – Chapter 3 73<br />

and the frontal sac respectively located at the beginning and the end of the head.<br />

We can measure the time between 2 successive pulses: this <strong>de</strong>lay is the time it takes<br />

<strong>for</strong> the acoustic wave to cross the head. From the known celerity of the acoustic<br />

wave in the head, this allows to estimate the head length and there<strong>for</strong>e the body<br />

length (Lopakta et al., 2006). B. Classification of Sperm whale clicks. Clicks were<br />

classified with the use of three parameters calculated after the Schur coefficients<br />

(<strong>for</strong> <strong>de</strong>tails, see Lopatka et al., 2006). Black circles: sperm whale clicks. Red circles:<br />

clicks from striped dolphins. C. This figure <strong>de</strong>scribes the different steps during the<br />

Sperm whale dives. Step 1, Sperm whale emits regular clicks at time intervals greater<br />

than 0.5sec to <strong>de</strong>tect the presence of preys. Step 2, Sperm whale emits buzz at time<br />

intervals less than 0.5sec to get a better resolution of the “acoustic image” of this<br />

volume. Step 3, Sperm whale stops emitting clicks at the end of this part of the dives<br />

and will go back to step A <strong>for</strong> another prey research.<br />

Sperm whale clicks have high frequency components (greater than<br />

5kHz), so it is possible to use a high pass filter cutoff frequency exceeding<br />

1kHz or more to overcome the ambient noise mostly due to the presence<br />

of maritime traffic. We tested several approaches to <strong>de</strong>tect sperm whale<br />

clicks: Teager-Kaiser operator (see figure 4), autoregressive and moving<br />

average mo<strong>de</strong>ls, Schur algorithm, spectrogram and wavelet <strong>de</strong>composition<br />

(Adam et al., 2005; Lopatka et al., 2005). The goals were firstly to<br />

minimise the false alarm rate, and secondly to obtain accurate estimates<br />

of the time of occurrence of clicks in or<strong>de</strong>r to localise the individuals by<br />

triangulation. We found that sperm whale clicks were characterised the<br />

best by reflection coefficients of the Schur mo<strong>de</strong>l (Lopatka et al., 2006).<br />

By using the Schur mo<strong>de</strong>l, it was then possible to characterise the morphology<br />

of individuals (the size of the sperm whale can be <strong>de</strong>duced from<br />

the inter-pulse), distinguish clicks of sperm whales from other transient<br />

sounds, and locate the individual with precision enough to rebuild its<br />

dive profiles (figure 5).<br />

4.2 Detection and localisation of blue whales<br />

We have also used passive acoustic monitoring to study Antarctic blue<br />

whale populations in the Southern Ocean. Most of the year, Antarctic<br />

blue whale emits a low frequency call (from 28Hz to 20Hz, see figure 6A)<br />

that lasts <strong>for</strong> 15-20 sec with high intensity every minute. Algorithms<br />

<strong>for</strong> automatic whale call <strong>de</strong>tection, extraction and discrimination were<br />

<strong>de</strong>veloped and used on a one-year continuous acoustic dataset (2003-<br />

2004) recor<strong>de</strong>d in the station located in sub Antarctic area near Crozet<br />

Islands un<strong>de</strong>r the framework of the International monitoring system of<br />

the comprehensive-test-ban treaty organisation (IMS-CTBTO). All data<br />

are available un<strong>de</strong>r contract with the Direction <strong>de</strong>s applications militaires<br />

du commissariat à l’énergie atomique (CEA-DAM). The aim was to assess


74 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Figure 6: Acoustic study of Antarctic blue whale. A. Two successive Antarctic blue<br />

whale calls. Calls are stereotypical sounds, with 2 main frequencies at 28Hz and<br />

20Hz. Antarctic blue whales emit these calls between 2 breathing phase. From<br />

this specific time-frequency pattern, these calls can be automatically <strong>de</strong>tected.<br />

b. Number of Antarctic blue whale calls <strong>de</strong>tected from the recordings of one<br />

hydrophone <strong>de</strong>ployed in the North of Crozet Island from May 2003 to April 2004.<br />

the seasonal occurrence of blue whale in a specific area. The <strong>de</strong>tection<br />

procedure was based on a matched filter mo<strong>de</strong>l (Samaran et al., 2008).<br />

More than 170,000 blue whale calls were <strong>de</strong>tected all year-round indicating<br />

their continuous presence in the region (figure 6B). Results revealed<br />

the seasonal occurrence and migration patterns of blue whales, providing<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation about <strong>ecology</strong> and habitats in this <strong>for</strong>mer commercial whaling<br />

area (Samaran et al., 2010c).<br />

A mathematical mo<strong>de</strong>l RAM (Range-<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt Acoustic Mo<strong>de</strong>l) was used<br />

to predict how sound levels changed with distance between vocalising<br />

whales and IMS receivers. This approach allowed estimating the size of the<br />

monitored area, which was estimated to be a radius of 200km. The distri-


Part I – Chapter 3 75<br />

bution of the estimated distances confirmed the presence of whales close<br />

to the Crozet Islands, showing the importance of this sub-Antarctic area<br />

<strong>for</strong> these endangered species especially during the austral summer feeding<br />

season (Samaran et al., 2010b). In addition, the triangular configuration of<br />

the calibrated hydrophones of the station allowed localising and tracking<br />

calling whales from observed differences in arrival times of the same signals<br />

at the three hydrophones. We could there<strong>for</strong>e estimate the movement<br />

and <strong>de</strong>tection range between the recording system and the animals, which<br />

are critical data to un<strong>de</strong>rstand the habitat of calling whales without human<br />

disturbance. The sound levels of received calls may also be used to estimate<br />

the level of sound emitted by the vocalising whales (Samaran et al., 2010a).<br />

The last objective of our analysis was to estimate the total number of<br />

vocalising whales. This task was not trivial and could be conducted along<br />

two methodological approaches. First, we could search <strong>for</strong> individual<br />

acoustic signature. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, this is difficult <strong>for</strong> cetaceans in their<br />

natural environment, especially when they are far from the hydrophone,<br />

because of the non-linear distortion of sound due to the acoustic propagation<br />

(Musikas et al., 2009). Second, we could use the distance sampling<br />

method. This method is well-known <strong>for</strong> a wi<strong>de</strong> range of applications with<br />

visual observations of wildlife, but it is particularly difficult to apply when<br />

little or no in<strong>for</strong>mation is available about the call rate (Marques et al.,<br />

2009). There<strong>for</strong>e, we suggested a third method based on a joint estimation<br />

of the number of calls emitted by each individual and the number of individuals<br />

in a specific area (Valsero et al., 2010). The two estimates are given<br />

by their probability functions, assumed to follow a Poisson distribution:<br />

( ) k<br />

s<br />

P( B()= s k)= e s k!<br />

( ) k<br />

μt<br />

PCt ( ()= k)= e μt k!<br />

where B(s) is the number of whales in the area s (around the hydrophone)<br />

and C(t) the number of <strong>de</strong>tected calls during time t. The estimated number<br />

of individuals in the study area at a time t can then be obtained by the<br />

method of moments using the maximum likelihood estimation (Valsero et<br />

al., 2010):<br />

ˆμ = N 2<br />

N<br />

N 2<br />

N<br />

ˆ =<br />

( 2 N<br />

N )s


76 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

where N is the number of <strong>de</strong>tected calls in the area s during t, N is the<br />

mean and<br />

2 N is the variance. The method gives estimates of the number<br />

of individuals present in the Crozet Archipelago during the year between<br />

0 and 4 individuals (95% confi<strong>de</strong>nce interval) based on the distribution of<br />

the time between successive calls and between 2 and 12 individuals based<br />

on the number of calls. This type of results is only possible with passive<br />

acoustics because visual observations cannot be conducted throughout<br />

the whole year in this area, highlighting the importance of having a permanent<br />

recording system installed there.<br />

Table 2: Estimation of the number [min, max] of whale individuals<br />

around the Crozet Archipelagos by 2 distributions based<br />

on the distribution 1) of the time between successive calls and 2)<br />

of the number of calls in a specific area (Valsero et al., 2010).<br />

Confi<strong>de</strong>nce interval (1) Confi<strong>de</strong>nce interval (2)<br />

Month 90% 95% 90% 95%<br />

May [1, 8] [1, 8] [3, 12] [2, 13]<br />

June [1, 8] [1, 9] [3, 12] [2, 13]<br />

July [1, 7] [0, 7] [2, 10] [2, 11]<br />

August [1, 7] [0, 7] [3, 11] [2, 12]<br />

September [0, 6] [0, 6] [3, 11] [2, 12]<br />

October [1, 6] [0, 7] [3, 10] [2, 11]<br />

November [1, 7] [0, 8] [3, 11] [2, 12]<br />

December [0, 6] [0, 7] [3, 11] [2, 12]<br />

January [0, 5] [0, 6] [3, 11] [2, 12]<br />

February [1, 7] [1, 8] [2, 10] [2, 11]<br />

March [0, 3] [0, 3] [2, 10] [2, 11]<br />

Avril [0, 6] [0, 7] [2, 10] [2, 11]<br />

Mean [0, 3] [0, 4] [3, 11] [2, 12]<br />

4.3 Analysis of Humpback whale songs<br />

During the breeding season, Humpback whale males emit songs structured<br />

in a hierarchical manner where the basic building blocks are called<br />

sound units according to Payne and McVay (1971). Until now, whale<br />

experts classified these sounds manually by listening and labeling their<br />

recordings on spectrograms. Their objective was to extract the leitmotiv<br />

of the song <strong>for</strong> a specific population in a specific area <strong>for</strong> the breeding<br />

season (Noad et al., 2000; Cerchio et al., 2001). Of course, it is clear that


Part I – Chapter 3 77<br />

the choice of the well-adapted hydrophones <strong>for</strong> this application is crucial<br />

to improve the correct classification.<br />

To help the biologists, our objective was to <strong>de</strong>velop an automatic analysis<br />

of Humpback whales songs (figure 7). This goal is quite difficult because,<br />

even when the hydrophone was just positioned in front of one singer, the<br />

recordings simultaneously inclu<strong>de</strong>d a lot of vocalisations from the other<br />

singers consi<strong>de</strong>red as background noise. So, to go further in the automatic<br />

classification task, we extracted different features of each sound unit, as<br />

duration, bandwith, harmonics, and frequency slopes. In addition, we<br />

proposed an original approach to increase the per<strong>for</strong>mance of our classifier:<br />

we <strong>de</strong>fined the concept of subunits, which means that the sound<br />

units <strong>de</strong>fined by Payne and McVay (1971) can be <strong>de</strong>composed into one or<br />

more subunits. By this <strong>de</strong>finition, we are willing to use the tonal in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

and the sound prosody (variation of the features in the frequency<br />

domain) to increase the correct classification. Our un<strong>de</strong>rlying i<strong>de</strong>a is to<br />

show that the diverse number of sound unit types per<strong>for</strong>med by the singers<br />

can be explained by a limited short number of subunits.<br />

Figure 7: Segmentation of Humpback whale song recording into units (green area)<br />

and ambient un<strong>de</strong>rwater noise (red area).<br />

The second step of our work was to extract in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> each <strong>de</strong>tected<br />

sound units. We first focused on the variation of the <strong>de</strong>rivative of the five<br />

first main energetic frequencies. We then also <strong>de</strong>fined different types of<br />

sound unit shape: sound unit with constant harmonic signals or chirps having<br />

increased or <strong>de</strong>creased, convex, concave or linear frequency variations.<br />

These features were extracted with different methods largely used in the<br />

Speech processing method (Kay, 1988) and based on the presence of at least<br />

one frequency in the sound units (Pace et al., 2009a). Classes were obtained<br />

by applying the unsupervised k-means algorithm, a statistical classification<br />

method, and the Davies-Bouldin criterion was used to evaluate the similarity<br />

within and between classes. This criterion ma<strong>de</strong> it possible to <strong>de</strong>termine


78 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

the optimal number of classes <strong>for</strong> all vocalisations present in our dataset.<br />

Based on this method, 18 different groups of subunits were <strong>de</strong>tected in a<br />

sample of 424 vocalisations (Picot et al., 2008; Pace et al., 2009b). We finally<br />

worked on hid<strong>de</strong>n Markov mo<strong>de</strong>ls to take into account the possible variant<br />

duration of the subunits and to characterise the link between successive<br />

subunits (i.e. the syntax, see figure 8). The complete method <strong>for</strong> automatic<br />

classification of these sound units is a valuable tool <strong>for</strong> biologists willing to<br />

investigate the song evolution and the interactions between or within populations.<br />

In the future, we expect that this method will also make it possible<br />

to assign an acoustic signature to a specific Humpback whale individual.<br />

Figure 8: Segmentation and classification of Humpback whale sound units. The<br />

sound units are not emitted in a random or<strong>de</strong>r by the singers. Thus we used the<br />

hid<strong>de</strong>n markov mo<strong>de</strong>l (HMM) to take advantage of the specific or<strong>de</strong>r of these sound<br />

units to <strong>de</strong>tect and classify them. MFCC: Mel-frequency cepstrum coefficients, Δs:<br />

a measure the temporal rates of change of the MFCCs.<br />

5. Conclusion and future work<br />

Using passive acoustic monitoring to assess cetacean populations has several<br />

benefits in comparison with conventional survey methods such as


Part I – Chapter 3 79<br />

visual sightings. The animals can be studied continuously without any<br />

negative impact. This method is also less <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt on weather conditions<br />

than visual methods, and does not rely on animals surfacing in<br />

or<strong>de</strong>r to be <strong>de</strong>tected. It can be applied globally, including remote areas<br />

where visual sightings are usually either too sparse, difficult to gather, or<br />

costly. Other advantages of passive acoustic monitoring are that it helps<br />

to i<strong>de</strong>ntify areas of cetacean concentration, seasonal occurrence and distribution<br />

patterns; it can facilitate the long-term monitoring of cetacean<br />

abundance through variations in call rates over the years, and in<strong>for</strong>m on<br />

where to establish marine protected areas. Passive acoustics is there<strong>for</strong>e an<br />

interesting complementary method <strong>for</strong> the cetacean observations.<br />

Table 3: Advantages and drawbacks of two permanent acoustic systems<br />

System with<br />

buoy at the<br />

sea surface<br />

System<br />

<strong>de</strong>ployed<br />

on the sea<br />

bottom<br />

Advantages<br />

Electrical power by solar panels<br />

and/or wind turbines<br />

Setting parameters (amplifier<br />

gain, sampling frequency)<br />

Data transmission via HF, Wifi<br />

Real-time application<br />

Discreet<br />

Less susceptible to surface<br />

activities<br />

Drawbacks<br />

Weather conditions:<br />

movement of waves, wind,<br />

bad weather<br />

Risk of damage and theft<br />

Electrical power<br />

Access to instrument<br />

(parameters settings)<br />

Data transmission<br />

Several passive acoustic approaches are possible, from instantaneous<br />

observations with a light <strong>de</strong>ployable hydrophone to continuous observations<br />

with sonobuoys <strong>de</strong>ployed either at the sea surface or on the seabed.<br />

The solutions offered by permanent observatories have advantages and<br />

drawbacks listed in table 3, and future work could be <strong>de</strong>dicated to build a<br />

system that retains the advantages of the two main techniques and eliminates<br />

the drawbacks. For this purpose, the power supply, data storage,<br />

and data transmission limits must be circumvented, especially <strong>for</strong> realtime<br />

applications. The best feasible solution is probably to set up fully<br />

cabled systems (data and power) at the sea bottom, even if this solution is<br />

quite expensive. Another important task is to <strong>de</strong>velop automatic real-time<br />

analysis <strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>tection and, if possible, the localisation of cetaceans.<br />

These analyses would be best conducted in situ and the results could be<br />

directly sent to the biologists and the managers of marine protected areas<br />

and/or coastal areas. This could provi<strong>de</strong> authorities with real-time monitoring<br />

tools to diminish the risk of collision between ships and cetaceans<br />

<strong>for</strong> example.


80 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Authors’ references<br />

Flore Samaran:<br />

Université <strong>de</strong> la Rochelle, Observatoire Pelagis, Centre <strong>de</strong> Recherche <strong>de</strong>s<br />

Mammifères Marins, ULR-CNRS UMS 3419, La Rochelle, France<br />

Nadège Gandilhon:<br />

Université <strong>de</strong>s Antilles et <strong>de</strong> la Guyane, Laboratoire <strong>de</strong> Biologie Marine,<br />

Equipe dynamique <strong>de</strong>s écosystèmes Caraïbes, Pointe-à-Pitre, Gua<strong>de</strong>loupe,<br />

France<br />

Rocio Prieto Gonzalez:<br />

Universidad <strong>de</strong> Valladolid, Departamento <strong>de</strong> Estadística e Investigación<br />

Operativa, Valladolid, Spain<br />

Rocio Prieto Gonzalez, Amy Kennedy, Olivier Adam:<br />

Université Paris Sud Orsay, Centre <strong>de</strong> Neurosciences Paris Sud, UPS-<br />

CNRS UMR 8195, Orsay, France<br />

Fe<strong>de</strong>rica Pace:<br />

University of Southampton, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research,<br />

Southampton England<br />

Amy Kennedy:<br />

Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Mammal Laboratory,<br />

Seattle, USA<br />

Olivier Adam:<br />

Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Institut Jean d’Alembert, Lutheries<br />

acoustique musicale, UPMC-CNRS UMR 7190, Paris, France<br />

Corresponding author: Olivier Adam, olivier.adam@u-psud.fr<br />

References<br />

Adam O., Lopatka M., Laplanche C., Motsch J.-F., 2005. Sperm whale signal<br />

analysis: comparison using the autoregressive mo<strong>de</strong>l and the wavelet<br />

trans<strong>for</strong>m. World Aca<strong>de</strong>my of Science, Engineering and Technology, 4,<br />

pp. 188-195.<br />

Adam O., 2008. Segmentation of killer whales vocalisations using the Hilbert<br />

Huang Trans<strong>for</strong>m. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing,<br />

2008, pp1-11.


Part I – Chapter 3 81<br />

Cerchio S., Jacobsen J. K., Norris T. F., 2001. Temporal and geographical<br />

variation in songs of humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae:<br />

synchronous change in Hawaiian and Mexican breeding assemblages.<br />

Animal Behaviour, 62, pp. 313-329.<br />

Frankel A. S., 1998. Sound production in: Perrin W. F., Wurisg B., Thevissen<br />

J. M. G. (Eds), Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals. Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press, San<br />

Diego, USA, pp. 1126-1137.<br />

Gandilhon N., Gervain P., Nolibe G., Louis M., Adam O., 2010. Creation of<br />

an autonomous system on moored Fish aggregating <strong>de</strong>vice (FAD) <strong>for</strong> a<br />

permanent acoustic monitoring of marine mammals and other perspectives<br />

<strong>for</strong> marine environment attention, Gua<strong>de</strong>loupe, F.W.I. 63th Annual Gulf<br />

and Caribbean Fisheries Institute (GCFI), Puerto Rico.<br />

Kay S. M., 1988. Mo<strong>de</strong>rn Spectral Estimation: Theory and application. Prentice<br />

Hall, Upper Saddle River, USA.<br />

Laplanche C., Adam o., Lopatka M., Motsch, J.-F., 2006. Measuring the<br />

off-axis angle and the rotational movements of phonating sperm whales<br />

using a single hydrophone. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,<br />

119, pp. 4074-4082.<br />

Lopatka M., Adam O., Laplanche C., Zarzycki J., Motsch, J.-F., 2005. An<br />

attractive alternative <strong>for</strong> sperm whale click <strong>de</strong>tection using the wavelet<br />

trans<strong>for</strong>m in comparison to the Fourier spectrogram. Aquatic Mammals,<br />

31, pp. 463-467.<br />

Lopatka M., Adam o., Laplanche C., Zarzycki J., Motsch, J. F., 2006.<br />

Effective analysis of non-stationary short-time signals based on the<br />

adaptive Schur filter. Transactions on Systems, Signals and Devices, 1,<br />

pp. 295-319.<br />

Marques T. A., Thomas L., Ward J., Dimarzio N., Tyack P. L., 2009. Estimating<br />

cetacean population <strong>de</strong>nsity using fixed passive acoustic sensors: an<br />

example with Blainville’s beaked whales. Journal of the Acoustical Society<br />

of America, 125, pp. 1982-1994.<br />

Mohl B., Wahlberg M., Madsen P., Heers<strong>for</strong>dt A., Lunds, A., 2003. The<br />

monopulsed nature of sperm whale clicks. Journal of the Acoustical<br />

Society of America, 114, pp. 1143-1154.<br />

Musikas, T., Samaran, F., Aupetit, M., Adam, O., 2009. Density estimation of<br />

Antarctic blue whales using automatic calls <strong>de</strong>tection. First International<br />

workshop on <strong>de</strong>nsity estimation of marine mammals using passive<br />

acoustics, Italy.<br />

Noad M. J., Cato D. H., Bry<strong>de</strong>n M. M., Jenner M. N., Jenner K. C. S., 2000.<br />

Cultural revolution in whale songs. Nature, 408, pp. 537.<br />

Nosengo N., Riccobene G., Pavan, G., 2009. The neutrino and the whale.<br />

Nature, 462, pp. 560-561.<br />

Pace F., White P., Adam O., 2009a. Comparison of feature sets <strong>for</strong> humpback<br />

whale song classification. Proceedings of the fifth IOA International<br />

Conference on Bio-Acoustics, 31, pp. 136-144.


82 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Pace F., White P., Adam O., 2009b. Characterisation of sound subunits <strong>for</strong><br />

humpback whale song analysis. 4th International Workshop on Detection<br />

and Localization of Marine Mammals using Passive Acoustics, Italy.<br />

Pace F., Benard F., Glotin H., Adam O., White P., 2010. Subunit <strong>de</strong>finition<br />

and analysis <strong>for</strong> humpback whale call classification. Applied Acoustics, 11,<br />

pp. 1107-1114.<br />

Payne R. S., McVay S., 1971. Songs of Humpback whales. Science, 173,<br />

pp. 585-597.<br />

Picot G., Adam O., Bergounioux M., Glotin H., Mayer F.-X., 2008. Automatic<br />

prosodic clustering of humpback whales song. New Trends <strong>for</strong><br />

Environmental Monitoring using Passive Systems, pp. 1-6.<br />

Samaran F., Adam O., Motsch J.-F., Guinet C., 2008. Definition of the Antarctic<br />

and pygmy blue whale call templates. Application to fast automatic<br />

<strong>de</strong>tection. Canadian Acoustics, 36, pp. 93-103.<br />

Samaran F., Adam O., Motsch J.-F., Cansi Y., Guinet C., 2010a. Source level<br />

estimation of two blue whale subspecies in southwestern Indian Ocean.<br />

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127, pp. 3800-3808.<br />

Samaran F., Adam O., Guinet C., 2010b. Detection range mo<strong>de</strong>ling of<br />

blue whale calls in southwestern Indian Ocean. Applied Acoustics, 71,<br />

pp. 1099-1106.<br />

Samaran F., Adam O., Guinet C., 2010c. Discovery of a mid-latitu<strong>de</strong> sympatric<br />

area <strong>for</strong> two Southern Hemisphere blue whale subspecies. Endangered<br />

Species Research, 12, pp. 157-165.<br />

Simmonds M. P., Dolman S., Weilgart L. (Eds) 2004. Oceans Of Noise. The<br />

Whale and dolphin conservation society, Chippenham, UK.<br />

Simmonds M. P., Isaac S., 2007. The impact of climate change on marine<br />

mammals: early signs of significant problems. Oryx, 41, pp. 1-8.<br />

Simmonds M. P., Eliott W. J., 2009. Climate change and cetaceans: concerns<br />

and recent <strong>de</strong>velopment. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of<br />

the United Kingdom, 89, pp. 203-210.<br />

Valsero, M. C., Prieto Gonzalez, R., Samaran, F., Adam, O., 2010. A spatiotemporal<br />

Poisson mo<strong>de</strong>l to estimate the <strong>de</strong>nsity of the Antartic blue whales<br />

in the Austral Ocean. International Workshop on Applied Probability,<br />

Espagne.


Chapter 4<br />

Bioacoustics approaches to locate<br />

and i<strong>de</strong>ntify animals in terrestrial<br />

environments<br />

Chloé Huetz, Thierry Aubin<br />

1. Needs <strong>for</strong> non-invasive methods to i<strong>de</strong>ntify and locate<br />

animals<br />

Population assessment and a proper un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of behavioural strategies<br />

are central and urgent tasks in conservation biology. Nevertheless, up<br />

to now, field-based biological researches are held back by the difficulty,<br />

cost and intrusiveness of marking and tagging animals, and the relative<br />

ineffectiveness of manual data collection and analysis thereafter. In<strong>de</strong>ed,<br />

the monitoring of wild animals almost systematically presupposes their<br />

catching first. This invasive stage is not necessary when animals are acoustically<br />

monitored (Gilbert et al., 1994; Hartwig, 2005). Almost all vocal<br />

species possess unique acoustic patterns that differ significantly from one<br />

to another individual, while following a common structure typical of the<br />

species. By using acoustic analysis methods, it is then possible to i<strong>de</strong>ntify<br />

individuals or species emitting vocalisations (insects, frogs, birds and<br />

mammals). Sound sources have also the property to be localisable. Until<br />

recently, localisation of wild animals by acoustic methods was not wi<strong>de</strong>ly<br />

used. This was mainly due to technical limitations, as the monitoring of<br />

simultaneous acoustic sources is problematic in the field. In<strong>de</strong>ed, among<br />

several requirements, simultaneous field recordings <strong>de</strong>vices have to share<br />

features such as being wireless, waterproof, easily transportable, and with<br />

large memory capacities. Now that technologies exist to overcome these<br />

limitations, it has become possible to localise and track the movements of<br />

animals that generate sounds. Such systems have been first called acoustic


84 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

location systems (ALS) by McGregor et al. (1997), but are now currently<br />

named automatic acoustic survey systems (AASS).<br />

An accurate AASS must fulfil two conditions: it must allow to localise the<br />

sound source with precision and i<strong>de</strong>ntify the emitter. Until now, AASS<br />

have been used mostly to <strong>de</strong>tect marine mammals (e.g. Staf<strong>for</strong>d et al.,<br />

1998; Mellinger and Clark, 2003; Clark and Clapham, 2004; see chapter<br />

I, 3). In contrast, AASS <strong>de</strong>dicated to the monitoring of terrestrial species<br />

are rather uncommon (even though Mennill et al. 2006 used it <strong>for</strong> a case<br />

study with birds). For cetaceans, sensors are hydrophones and AASS spatial<br />

precision <strong>for</strong> animal localisation is in the kilometre range. Animals<br />

can also be tagged with localisation systems such as Argos <strong>for</strong> more accurate<br />

localisation, but even these systems cannot provi<strong>de</strong> an accuracy below<br />

the metre range. For terrestrial species, more accurate locations are often<br />

required, <strong>for</strong> example, to <strong>de</strong>termine the relative positions of neighbouring<br />

birds. In addition, tagging small terrestrial animals is often impossible due<br />

to several technical reasons (small size, difficulty of catching animals, see<br />

chapter I, 2). Moreover, marine and terrestrial environments differ from<br />

an acoustic point of view, the latter being often less homogeneous, with<br />

more obstacles.<br />

Here we review and discuss the accuracy of AASS <strong>for</strong> monitoring the<br />

position of animals vocalising in different terrestrial environments. We<br />

first introduce the principles and purposes of acoustic location systems.<br />

Then, we propose a non-exhaustive review of the different methods that<br />

can be implemented in an AASS in or<strong>de</strong>r to automatically locate animals<br />

from the sounds they produce. We also present several existing<br />

methods used to extract from a vocalisation the individual and the species<br />

signatures. Finally, we illustrate the use of these technologies with<br />

some recent field applications concerning the location of birds in <strong>for</strong>est<br />

habitats.<br />

2. Localisation system: time <strong>de</strong>lay of sound arrival estimation<br />

and triangulation<br />

2.1. Principle of Automatic Acoustic Survey Systems<br />

Acoustic location systems use simultaneous recordings from an array of<br />

acoustic sensors (microphones or hydrophones) scattered over a particular<br />

area. From these recordings, two measurements can be extracted to<br />

compute the sound-source location: the level (or amplitu<strong>de</strong>) differences<br />

between recordings, and the time <strong>de</strong>lays between the sound arrival times<br />

at spatially separated microphones (see <strong>for</strong> review McGregor et al., 1997;<br />

Mennill et al., 2006). The latter, usually <strong>de</strong>signated as the time-of-arrival


Part I – Chapter 4 85<br />

difference (TDoA) is estimated either i) by pair-wise cross-correlations<br />

of the sound wave<strong>for</strong>ms recor<strong>de</strong>d from the time-synchronised microphones<br />

or ii) by beam<strong>for</strong>ming algorithms, which can be <strong>de</strong>fined as the<br />

sum of all signals or their energy in the time domain (Valin et al., 2004)<br />

or in the frequency domain (Chen et al., 2006) properly time-<strong>de</strong>layed.<br />

The cross-correlation between two recordings shows one peak, corresponding<br />

to the TDoA of the same sound source at the two microphone<br />

positions.<br />

Figure 1: Representation of our automatic acoustic survey system (AASS)<br />

localisation procedure. The first step consists in setting up the microphones and<br />

the wireless recording system (1). All pairwise distances between microphones are<br />

measured with a lasermeter (1.1), and all channels are recor<strong>de</strong>d synchronously<br />

on a laptop computer (1.2). The offline analysis (2) follows three steps: from the<br />

6-channels recordings, the animals’ vocalisations are extracted and band-pass<br />

filtered (2.1) to extract putative noise sources, then pairwise cross-correlations of<br />

the wave<strong>for</strong>ms are per<strong>for</strong>med <strong>for</strong> each vocalisation (2.2) in or<strong>de</strong>r to compute the<br />

time-of-arrival differences, which are then used to locate each vocalisation (2.3).<br />

Sound source location can then be <strong>de</strong>termined using the so-called triangulation<br />

principle. In<strong>de</strong>ed, the TDoAs of a sound between each microphone<br />

pair constrain the emitter’s location to a hyperboloid, and its


86 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

precise location can be resolved by intersecting hyperboloids from many<br />

pairs of receivers. Another possibility is to divi<strong>de</strong> the space around the<br />

microphones into cells by a grid and compute all possible TDoAs <strong>for</strong><br />

each cell. The location of a sound source is then computed by minimising<br />

the difference between the measured TDoAs with the theoretical<br />

ones. When using the beam<strong>for</strong>ming algorithms, TDoA are estimated by<br />

searching the <strong>de</strong>lays between recordings that maximise the output signal<br />

of the beam<strong>for</strong>mer. Lastly, some methods use simultaneously the TDoA,<br />

the level (amplitu<strong>de</strong>) difference, and the reflection of the sound on the<br />

surface and ground to locate with a greater precision the emitter (Cato,<br />

1998).<br />

Figure 2: Example of the output of our localisation system. In this case, a<br />

loudspeaker was placed outsi<strong>de</strong> the microphone configuration (red star) and was<br />

emitting seven vocalisations. Each vocalisation was then localised (blue circle). As<br />

shown on the zoom, the localisation error is small, on the centimetre range.<br />

our AASS consisted of an array of six wireless omnidirectional microphones<br />

recording simultaneously up to six-channel sound files on a laptop<br />

computer via an emitter-receiver station (figure 1). The microphones<br />

were set up throughout a given area in the field. Exploiting the speed of<br />

sound propagation through air, the system triangulates the position of<br />

sound sources on the basis of TDoAs at the microphones. These TDoAs


Part I – Chapter 4 87<br />

are estimated using a cross-correlation of the band-pass filtered wave<strong>for</strong>ms.<br />

Instead of using the standard triangulation equations, we applied<br />

a simple exhaustive search in space like Hammer and Barrett (2001). Test<br />

experiments were conducted in the field in brazilian rain<strong>for</strong>est and in<br />

European temperate <strong>for</strong>ests in or<strong>de</strong>r to probe the accuracy of the system.<br />

A loudspeaker was placed at a given location around the microphones,<br />

and its distance to the microphones was measured with a lasermeter.<br />

Several sounds were played and recor<strong>de</strong>d on the AASS. Figure 2 shows<br />

an example of the localisation system’s result <strong>for</strong> the playback of seven<br />

bird songs (computed source in blue circles). The “real position” of the<br />

emitter (the loudspeaker) is indicated with a red star and it can be seen<br />

that all songs are localised very close to the “real” position measured with<br />

the lasermeter.<br />

2.2. Limits of Automatic Acoustic Survey Systems<br />

Acoustic localisation systems are prone to the same constraints and usually<br />

present the same limits as any kind of acoustic survey system. In<strong>de</strong>ed,<br />

sound localisation of animals is difficult when emitters are distributed<br />

wi<strong>de</strong>ly in the open and when reverberations <strong>de</strong>gra<strong>de</strong> temporal patterns in<br />

vocalisations (Spiesberger, 1999). Selective filtering due to obstacles in the<br />

environment can also modify the signal during propagation (Spiesberger,<br />

1999; 2005). In noisy environments, multiple sounds coming from different<br />

species or individuals, and their background, can overlap with the<br />

signal of interest in the temporal and frequency domains, producing a<br />

jamming effect and leading to false localisations. An insufficient signalto-noise<br />

ratio in turn impairs the localisation process (Quazi and Lerro,<br />

1985) and methods to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio (e.g. a band-pass<br />

prefiltering) must be applied when possible. In general, any factor <strong>de</strong>teriorating<br />

the cross-correlations between recordings strongly affects the<br />

TDOA estimation and there<strong>for</strong>e can diminish the accuracy of the localisation<br />

process (Spiesberger, 1999; 2005).<br />

In addition, several constraints are specific to the use of an AASS <strong>for</strong> the<br />

purpose of localisation. The first necessary prerequisite of any localisation<br />

system is to know accurately the relative positions of the microphones<br />

(Quazi and Lerro, 1985). In<strong>de</strong>ed, in or<strong>de</strong>r to make use of the TDOAs<br />

and convert them into distances relative to the microphones, the whole<br />

microphone configuration has to be known, and subsequently, several<br />

pairwise distances between microphones have to be measured. The accuracy<br />

and the space coverage of the localisation process strongly <strong>de</strong>pend<br />

on the inter-microphone distances. In fact, the optimisation of the spatial<br />

configuration of microphones faces tra<strong>de</strong>-offs between a large spacing,<br />

an accurate measurement of their relative positions, and a good signal-to-


88 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

noise ratio of the recor<strong>de</strong>d vocalisation on the different microphones. If<br />

most of the studies assess that, in theory, three microphones are necessary<br />

to localise in 2D, and four in 3D, it has been shown that one additional<br />

microphone is nee<strong>de</strong>d to obtain accurate estimates of sound location (4 in<br />

2D and 5 in 3D, Spiesberger, 2001).<br />

Moreover, some redundancy can help the localisation process (Chen<br />

et al., 2003). Depending on the nee<strong>de</strong>d accuracy of the output localisation<br />

and on the studied environment, several methods can be used to<br />

measure the relative microphone positions. The position of the microphones<br />

can be estimated by the coordinates of a global-positioning system<br />

– GPS (Mennill et al., 2006). However, GPS positioning can hardly<br />

be used when animals need to be localised with great accuracy (less<br />

than 1m), or in obstructed environments such as <strong>de</strong>nse <strong>for</strong>ests. In these<br />

cases, a lasermeter can be used un<strong>de</strong>r the condition that no obstacle<br />

stops the laser beam and thus prevents the distance measures between<br />

pairs. This constrains the inter-microphone distances in thick vegetation<br />

or in irregular topography. Another constraint on the microphone<br />

configuration is the perfect time-synchronization that must be achieved<br />

between <strong>de</strong>vices. A wireless or a wired synchronization system is there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

nee<strong>de</strong>d.<br />

3. I<strong>de</strong>ntification systems: review of acoustic methods<br />

to extract species and individual signatures from animals’<br />

vocalisations<br />

3.1. Principles of i<strong>de</strong>ntification systems<br />

The fact that animals can recognise one another by voice alone has been<br />

<strong>de</strong>monstrated repeatedly, especially in birds (<strong>for</strong> a review see Falls, 1982;<br />

Dhondt and Lambrechts, 1992) and mammals (<strong>for</strong> example Balcombe<br />

and McCracken, 1992, <strong>for</strong> bats; Caldwell et al., 1990, <strong>for</strong> dolphins; Sèbe et<br />

al., 2010, <strong>for</strong> lambs; Tooze and Harrington, 1990, <strong>for</strong> wolves). The in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

content of a signal is represented by structural sound features such<br />

as its spectrum or the temporal evolution of its amplitu<strong>de</strong> and frequency<br />

modulations (see figure 3). A signal would be i<strong>de</strong>al <strong>for</strong> individual or species<br />

recognition if it is highly stereotyped within each individual or species,<br />

and if it significantly differs between individuals or species. Different<br />

methods are available <strong>for</strong> <strong>de</strong>termining which parameters enco<strong>de</strong> acoustic<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntity and allow recognition between species or between individuals.


Part I – Chapter 4 89<br />

Figure 3: Examples of display calls (above: spectrograms; below: oscillograms)<br />

emitted by three individuals of King penguins Aptenodytes patagonicus (from Aubin<br />

and Jouventin, 2002).


90 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Among the possible means to i<strong>de</strong>ntify animal vocalisations, the most<br />

classical method is the visual inspection and labelling of oscillographs<br />

or spectrographs. This process is time consuming and <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt upon<br />

the judgement of one observer (Kogan and Margoliash, 1998). Besi<strong>de</strong><br />

this “manual” approach, some more or less automatic classification methods<br />

can be used. A first method is based on variance calculations realised<br />

on the temporal, amplitu<strong>de</strong> and frequency parameters of a given signal.<br />

For each call parameter, the between-individual and within-individual<br />

coefficients of variation (CVbi and CVwi) can be calculated as follows:<br />

CV = 100 (SD/X<br />

1<br />

mean<br />

)(1 + [ 4n ]) ,<br />

where SD is the standard <strong>de</strong>viation, Xmean the mean of the sample and<br />

n the sample size (Sokal and Rohlf, 1995). To assess the potential <strong>for</strong> the<br />

coding of individual i<strong>de</strong>ntity (potential of individual coding: PIC) <strong>for</strong><br />

each parameter, the ratio CVbi E(CVwi), where E(CVwi) is the mean value<br />

of the CVwi of all individuals, is calculated (Scherrer, 1984; Robisson<br />

et al., 1993). For a given parameter, a PIC value greater than 1 means<br />

that this parameter may correspond to an individual parameter as its<br />

intra-individual variability is smaller than its inter-individual variability.<br />

In the same way, the potential of specific coding (PSC) can be evaluated<br />

with the same <strong>for</strong>mula by using the between-species and withinspecies<br />

coefficients of variation. Besi<strong>de</strong> this univariate approach using<br />

parameters with high PIC or PSC values, multivariate analyses (discriminant<br />

function analysis, DFA, principal component analysis, PCA, and<br />

artificial neural network analysis, ANN) can be per<strong>for</strong>med (figure 4).<br />

All these methods provi<strong>de</strong> classification procedures that assign each<br />

recor<strong>de</strong>d call to its appropriate emitter (correct assignment) or reject the<br />

assignment (see Terry and McGregor, 2002).<br />

Other existing vocalisation classification techniques are based on traditional<br />

automatic speech recognition methods (Rabiner and Juang, 1993).<br />

one conventional method, the dynamic time warping (DTW; An<strong>de</strong>rson<br />

et al., 1996), is well suited <strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>tection of pure tones such as those<br />

in bird, bat and cetacean songs. This method compares the spectrograms<br />

(frequency versus time representation, see figure 3) of input sounds with<br />

those of a training data set of pre<strong>de</strong>fined templates (representative of<br />

sounds to <strong>de</strong>tect and chosen by the investigator) by successive cross-correlations<br />

(Clark et al., 1987). These templates are the targeted database <strong>for</strong><br />

the matching process. In contrast to the <strong>de</strong>terministic template matching<br />

of DTW, another method, the hid<strong>de</strong>n markov mo<strong>de</strong>l (HMM, Rabiner,<br />

1989) uses a statistical representation. Briefly, an HMM is typically a collection<br />

of finite sets of states. Each state represents spectral properties<br />

in the <strong>for</strong>m of Gaussian mixtures of spectral features, while temporal<br />

properties are represented by state transition probabilities. Each state has


Part I – Chapter 4 91<br />

a probability distribution over the possible output cases. There<strong>for</strong>e, the<br />

sequence of cases generated by a HMM provi<strong>de</strong>s in<strong>for</strong>mation about the<br />

sequence of states and are thus especially adapted <strong>for</strong> temporal pattern<br />

recognition of sounds such as sequences of successive notes in songs. This<br />

list of classifiers presented here is not exhaustive and it is possible to find<br />

in the literature a lot of other acoustic i<strong>de</strong>ntification methods such as <strong>for</strong><br />

example the spectral peak tracks method (SPTM) recently suggested by<br />

Chen and Maher (2006).<br />

Figure 4: A principal component analysis taking into account 2 factors (F1 + F2<br />

= 54% of the total variance) and based upon 18 acoustic parameters measured in<br />

the song of a tropical bird, the White-browed Warbler Basileuterus leucoblepharus.<br />

on this basis, the PCA separates 71% of the 21 individuals analysed. Each polygon<br />

corresponds to one individual (from Aubin et al., 2004).<br />

3.2. Limits of i<strong>de</strong>ntification systems<br />

All the methods <strong>de</strong>scribed above are well suited to classify sounds, but<br />

they also have some limitations. The most important requirement <strong>for</strong> the<br />

reliability of the i<strong>de</strong>ntification of vocal signature is that emitters produce<br />

individualised and stable vocalisations. Another necessity is to have a prior<br />

knowledge of the structure of the vocalisations emitted by the individuals


92 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

who will be then automatically i<strong>de</strong>ntified. For example, as un<strong>de</strong>rlined by<br />

Terry et al. (2005), discriminant function analysis may assign all vocalisations<br />

to particular individuals if all individuals are known; thus this<br />

method cannot accommodate vocalisations from new individuals. All<br />

these methods, qualified as “supervised” methods, use in fact a training<br />

data set or templates that must be “learned” by the classifier. Instead, the<br />

HMM mo<strong>de</strong>l is based on a statistical calculation; it can there<strong>for</strong>e accumulate<br />

more in<strong>for</strong>mation and possibly generalise better than techniques<br />

based on fixed templates. The ANN classifiers often require a very high<br />

computational complexity. The DTW method does not use amplitu<strong>de</strong><br />

normalisation, so the results may be sensitive to amplitu<strong>de</strong> differences<br />

between signals. The DTW and HMM methods do not per<strong>for</strong>m well in<br />

noisy environments or <strong>for</strong> sounds with short duration and variable amplitu<strong>de</strong>.<br />

In a word, all of the proposed methods accommodate well tonal or<br />

harmonic sounds, but are inappropriate when vocalisations containing<br />

aperiodic or noise-like components are involved.<br />

4. Field applications<br />

Studying animals in their natural habitat with a minimised influence on<br />

their behaviour is a key issue in <strong>ecology</strong> and ethology. Locating animals by<br />

the sounds they produce has the first advantage to be passive, meaning that<br />

the effect of the AASS on animal behaviour is insignificant. The second<br />

benefit is that terrestrial AASS can be used in habitats where visual location<br />

is difficult, such as <strong>de</strong>nse vegetation (tropical <strong>for</strong>ests, bushes, reed-beds).<br />

These systems may be also useful <strong>for</strong> studying secretive animals, difficult<br />

to observe because of large home ranges or nocturnal activity (see chapter<br />

IV, 2). They also ensure an accurate investigation of biological questions<br />

such as territorial <strong>de</strong>fence, nest site, and mate fi<strong>de</strong>lity. For example, they<br />

may be used to monitor multiple individuals simultaneously and, there<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

study behaviours such as territorial interactions between neighbours and<br />

duetting (Bower and Clark, 2005; Burt and Vehrencamp, 2005; Mennill<br />

and Vehrencamp, 2008). Thus, these systems seem particularly suitable <strong>for</strong><br />

studying communication networks. For example, we are currently studying<br />

in the Amazonian <strong>for</strong>est the acoustic network of a typical bird of this habitat,<br />

the screaming piha Lipaugus vociferans. This species shows a remarkable<br />

<strong>for</strong>m of lek display: females are attracted by singing assemblies of males and<br />

come <strong>for</strong> mating. Up to 25 males distributed on an area of about 600m of<br />

diameter are usually observed at a single lek. Each male has its own song<br />

posts and it counter-sings the other males. The use of an AASS will enable<br />

us to <strong>de</strong>cipher this complex vocal organisation and particularly, to examine<br />

the singing interactions and movements of all the birds from a lek.


Part I – Chapter 4 93<br />

In a more general way, AASSs appear extremely useful to provi<strong>de</strong>, with very<br />

little human interference, quantitative and qualitative indices of animal<br />

diversity in poorly accessible environments. Starting from this method,<br />

it is possible to <strong>de</strong>velop concrete applications with an acoustic plat<strong>for</strong>m<br />

<strong>de</strong>signed <strong>for</strong> the estimation of biodiversity of the fauna in different categories<br />

of environments. An automatic acoustic survey may help in the evaluation<br />

of the biological quality of a given habitat and appears as a useful tool<br />

<strong>for</strong> measuring the abundance of species or the impact of human activity<br />

on biodiversity (Sueur et al, 2008; see also II, 1). This method should substitute<br />

to the traditional human visual or hear sampling realised on point<br />

counts (i.e. Uezu et al., 2005) to estimate the abundance of vocal species in<br />

remote or obstructed environments, such as rain<strong>for</strong>ests. Thus, we believe<br />

that acoustic location and i<strong>de</strong>ntification technology may provi<strong>de</strong> a valuable<br />

and versatile tool <strong>for</strong> ecologists and ethologists.<br />

5. Conclusion: future orientations, <strong>de</strong>velopments<br />

and needs <strong>for</strong> new sensors?<br />

AASSs offer one of the best solutions <strong>for</strong> a non-invasive sensor that will<br />

enable biologists both to locate and i<strong>de</strong>ntify individuals of a large number<br />

of “singing” species within a population in cheap, fast and automatic manner<br />

and in a wi<strong>de</strong> range of environments. The emergence of this method<br />

is sped up by recent technological advances. Thus, commercially available<br />

autonomous digital recor<strong>de</strong>rs are now able to collect thousands of hours of<br />

audio data. The automatic i<strong>de</strong>ntification of vocalisations is not always perfectly<br />

accurate, but the <strong>de</strong>velopment of new algorithms methods in automatic<br />

human speech recognition has recently improved the process. Source<br />

localisation algorithms <strong>for</strong> monitoring vocal wildlife populations are now<br />

efficient, the limitations being mainly due either to imprecise microphone<br />

coordinates or the presence of a particular constellation of competing sound<br />

sources in the field. In the first case, the <strong>de</strong>velopment of more accurate GPS<br />

would be an alternative to laser measurements to geolocate more precisely<br />

microphones. With such systems, it would also be possible to increase the<br />

distance between the microphone and thus monitor a wi<strong>de</strong>r area. In the<br />

second case, the noise generated by parasitic sounds overlapping the target<br />

sound, should be more or less removed by using specific artificial neural<br />

network analysis. Despite significant progress in source localisation theory<br />

and sensor network systems, progress toward <strong>de</strong>veloping prototype AASSs<br />

has been greatly slowed down by the absence of integrated plat<strong>for</strong>ms suitable<br />

<strong>for</strong> monitoring wild animals. An emphasis must be now placed on<br />

fully integrated systems (hardware and software) that are robust enough to<br />

be <strong>de</strong>ployed in all kind of environments, and user-friendly enough to be<br />

used by biologists with little or no technical expertise.


94 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Authors’ reference:<br />

Chloé Huetz, Thierry Aubin:<br />

Université Paris-Sud, Centre <strong>de</strong> Neurosciences Paris-Sud, UPS-CNRS<br />

UMR 8195, Orsay, France<br />

Corresponding author: Thierry Aubin, thierry.aubin@u-psud.fr<br />

Aknowledgement<br />

We thanks F. Sèbe, H. Courvoisier and M.L. da Silva <strong>for</strong> technical support<br />

and help in the field. The work in the Amazonian <strong>for</strong>est (Brazil) was<br />

financially supported by a FP7-people-IEF grant.<br />

References<br />

An<strong>de</strong>rson S. E., Dave A. S., Margoliash D., 1996. Template-based automatic<br />

recognition of birdsong syllables from continuous recordings. Journal of<br />

the Acoustical Society of America, 100, pp. 1209-1219.<br />

Aubin T., Jouventin P., 2002. How to i<strong>de</strong>ntify vocally a kin in a crowd? The<br />

penguin mo<strong>de</strong>l. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 31, pp. 243-277.<br />

Aubin T., Mathevon N., Da Silva M.L., Vielliard J.M.E., Sèbe F., 2004. How a<br />

simple and stereotyped acoustic signal transmits individual in<strong>for</strong>mation:<br />

the song of the White-browed Warbler Basileuterus leucoblepharus. Anais da<br />

Aca<strong>de</strong>mia brasileira <strong>de</strong> Ciencias, 76, pp. 335-344.<br />

Balcombe J. P., McCracken G. F., 1992. Vocal recognition in Mexican free-tailed<br />

bats: do pups recognize mothers? Animal Behaviour, 43, pp. 79-87.<br />

Bower J.L., Clark C.W., 2005. A field test of the accuracy of a passive acoustic<br />

location system. Bioacoustics, 15, pp. 1-14.<br />

Burt J.M., Vehrencamp S.L., 2005. Dawn chorus as an interactive communication<br />

network, in: McGregor P. K. (Ed.), Animal Communication Networks.<br />

Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 320-343.<br />

Caldwel, M.C., Caldwell D.K., Tyack P. L., 1990. Review of the signaturewhistle<br />

hypothesis <strong>for</strong> the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin, in: Leatherwood<br />

S., Reeves R.R. (Eds.), The bottlenose dolphin. Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press, New York,<br />

pp. 199-234.<br />

Cato D.H., 1998. Simple methods of estimating source levels and locations of<br />

marine animal sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104,<br />

pp. 1667-1678.<br />

Chen C.E., Ali A.M., Wang H., 2006. Design and testing of robust acoustic<br />

arrays <strong>for</strong> localization and enhancement of several bird sources, in: IPSN


Part I – Chapter 4 95<br />

Proceedings of the 5th international conference on In<strong>for</strong>mation processing<br />

in sensor networks. Association <strong>for</strong> Computing Machinery, New York,<br />

pp. 268-275.<br />

Chen Z., Maher R.C., 2006. Semi-automatic classification of bird vocalizations<br />

using spectral peak tracks. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,<br />

120, pp. 2974-2984.<br />

Clark C.W., Clapham P.J., 2004. Acoustic monitoring on a humpback whale<br />

(Megaptera novaeangliae) feeding ground shows continual singing into late<br />

spring. Proceedings of the Royal society of London B, 271, pp. 1051-1057.<br />

Clark C.W., Marler P., beeman K., 1987. Quantitative analysis of animal<br />

phonology; an application to swamp sparrow song. Ethology, 76, pp. 101-115.<br />

Dhondt A.A., Lambrechts M.M., 1992. Individual voice recognition in birds.<br />

Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7, pp. 178–179.<br />

Falls J.B., 1982. Individual recognition by sound in birds, in: Kroodsma D.E.,<br />

Miller E.H. (Eds), Acoustic Communication in Birds, vol. 2. Aca<strong>de</strong>mic<br />

Press, New York, pp. 237-278.<br />

Gilbert G., McGregor P.K., Tyler G., 1994. Vocal individuality as a census tool:<br />

practical consi<strong>de</strong>rations illustrated by a study of two rare species. Journal<br />

of Field Ornithology, 65, pp. 335-348.<br />

Hammer O., Barrett N., 2001. Techniques <strong>for</strong> studying the spatio-temporal<br />

distribution of animal vocalizations in tropical wet <strong>for</strong>ests. Bioacoustics,<br />

12, pp. 21-35.<br />

Hartwig S., 2005. Individual acoustic i<strong>de</strong>ntification as a non-invasive<br />

conservation tool: an approach to the conservation of the African wild<br />

dog Lycaon pictus (Temminck, 1820). Bioacoustics, 15, pp. 35-50.<br />

Kogan J.A., Margoliash D., 1998. Automated recognition of bird song elements<br />

from continuous recordings using dynamic time warping and hid<strong>de</strong>n<br />

Markov mo<strong>de</strong>ls: a comparative study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of<br />

America, 103, pp. 2185-2196.<br />

McGregor P.K., Dabelsteen T., Clark C.W., Bower J.L., Tavares J.P., Holland J.,<br />

1997. Accuracy of a passive acoustic location system: empirical studies in<br />

terrestrial habitats. Ethology Ecology Evolution, 9, pp. 269-286.<br />

Mellinger D. K., Clark C. W., 2003. Blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus) sounds<br />

from the North Atlantic. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,<br />

114, pp. 1108-1119.<br />

Mennill D. J., Burt J. M., Fristrup K. M., Vehrencamp S. L., 2006. Accuracy<br />

of an acoustic location system <strong>for</strong> monitoring the position of duetting<br />

songbirds in tropical <strong>for</strong>est. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,<br />

119, pp. 2832-2839.<br />

Mennill D. J., Vehrencamp S. L. 2008. Context-<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt functions of avian<br />

duets revealed through microphone-array recordings and multispeaker<br />

playback. Current Biology, 18, pp. 1314-1319.<br />

Quazi A. H., Lerro D.T., 1985. Passive localization using time <strong>de</strong>lay estimates<br />

with sensor positional errors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,<br />

78, pp. 1664-1670.


96 Ecophysiology and animal behaviour<br />

Rabiner L. R., 1989. A tutorial on hid<strong>de</strong>n markov mo<strong>de</strong>ls and selected<br />

applications in speech recognition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE, 77,<br />

pp. 257-286.<br />

Rabiner L. R., Juang B. H., 1993. Fundamentals of Speech Recognition,<br />

Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.<br />

Robisson P., Aubin T., Brémond J.C., 1993. Individuality in the voice of emperor<br />

penguin Aptenodytes <strong>for</strong>steri: adaptation to a noisy environment. Ethology,<br />

94, pp. 279-290.<br />

Scherrer B., 1984. Biostatistique. Gaëtan Morin, Chicoutimy, Canada.<br />

Sèbe F., Duboscq J., Ligout S., Aubin T., Poindron P., 2010. Early vocal<br />

recognition of mother by lambs: contribution of low and high-frequency<br />

vocalizations. Animal Behaviour, 79, pp. 1055-1066.<br />

Sokal R. R., Rohlf F. J., 1995. Biometry, third ed. W.H. Freeman and Company,<br />

New York, USA.<br />

Spiesberger J. L., 1999. Locating animals from their sounds and tomography<br />

of the atmosphere: experimental <strong>de</strong>monstration. Journal of the Acoustial<br />

society of America, 106, pp. 837-846.<br />

Spiesberger J. L., 2001. Hyperbolic location errors due to insufficient numbers of<br />

receivers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, pp. 3076-3079.<br />

Spiesberger J. L., 2005. Probability distributions <strong>for</strong> locations of calling animals,<br />

receivers, sound speeds, winds, and data from travel time differences.<br />

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, pp. 1790-1800.<br />

Staf<strong>for</strong>d K. M., Fox C. G., Clark D. S., 1998. Long-range acoustic <strong>de</strong>tection and<br />

localization of blue whale calls in the northeastern Pacific Ocean. Journal<br />

of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, pp. 3616-3625.<br />

Sueur J., Pavoine S., Hamerlynck O., Duvail S., 2008. Rapid acoustic survey <strong>for</strong><br />

biodiversity appraisal. PLoS One, 3, pp. 1-9.<br />

Terry A.M.R., McGregor P.K., 2002. Census and monitoring based on<br />

individually i<strong>de</strong>ntifiable vocalizations: the role of neural networks.<br />

Animal Conservation, 5, pp. 103-111.<br />

Terry A.M.R., Peak, T., McGregor P.K., 2005. The role of vocal individuality in<br />

conservation. Frontiers in Zoology, 2, 10.<br />

Tooze Z. J., Harrington F. H., Fentress, J. C., 1990. Individually distinct<br />

vocalisations in timber wolves, Canis lupus. Animal Behaviour, 40,<br />

pp. 723-730.<br />

Uezu A., Metzger J. P., Vielliard J. M. E., 2005. Effects of structural and<br />

functional connectivity and patch size on the abundance of seven Atlantic<br />

Forest bird species. Biological Conservation, 123, pp. 507-519.<br />

Valin J. M., Michaud F., Hadjou B., Rouat J., 2004. Localization of simultaneous<br />

moving sound sources <strong>for</strong> mobile robot using a frequency- domain steered<br />

beam<strong>for</strong>mer approach, in: Proceedings of IEEE International conference<br />

on Robotics and Automation, 1, pp. 1033-1038.


II<br />

BIODIVERSITY


Chapter 1<br />

Global estimation of animal diversity<br />

using automatic acoustic sensors<br />

Jérôme Sueur, Amandine Gasc, Philippe Grandcolas, Sandrine Pavoine<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The estimation of biodiversity can be consi<strong>de</strong>red as one of the main challenges<br />

in mo<strong>de</strong>rn biology. When <strong>de</strong>aling with <strong>ecology</strong>, evolutionary biology<br />

and conservation biology, there is an inescapable need to <strong>de</strong>scribe<br />

the composition and dynamics of biological diversity (Magurran, 2004).<br />

In <strong>ecology</strong>, the concept of biological diversity is mainly species-oriented,<br />

even if other evolutionary units or traits can also be used. In this context,<br />

biodiversity potentially refers to all species encountered in a given area<br />

at a specified time, including every potential species from un<strong>de</strong>rground<br />

bacteria to giant trees. There<strong>for</strong>e, biodiversity assessment can turn out to<br />

be a time-consuming and complex task, as it relies on species inventory<br />

that may involve very different taxonomic groups.<br />

Exhaustive approaches such as the all taxa biodiversity inventory (ATBI)<br />

programs aim at inventorying the whole biodiversity mainly in tropical<br />

habitats (Gewin, 2002), but these programs are highly sensitive to the<br />

logistic and time-constraints of most inventory studies. An alternative to<br />

these approaches is to focus on one or a few taxa and consi<strong>de</strong>r them as<br />

biodiversity indicators (Pearson, 1994), but the choice of representative<br />

taxa is not trivial (Lawton et al., 1998). In addition, it is well known that<br />

patterns of species diversity <strong>for</strong> different taxa are sensitive to the observation<br />

scale. More precisely, there is a general congruence <strong>for</strong> species diversity<br />

between different taxa at a large area scale (more than 1km 2 ) but not<br />

at a fine scale (less than 1km 2 , Weaver, 1995). This ren<strong>de</strong>rs difficult the<br />

<strong>de</strong>finition of an indicator taxon or even of several indicator taxa supposedly<br />

representative of the diversity in other <strong>for</strong>ms of organisms (Ricketts


100 Biodiversity<br />

et al., 1999). Irrespective of the taxonomic breadth of any biodiversity<br />

assessment, the estimation of species biodiversity relies on inventories and<br />

species examination by one or several taxonomic experts that can be supported<br />

with genetic barcoding techniques (see chapter II, 3). Sampling<br />

in the field and i<strong>de</strong>ntification in museum collections can require a consi<strong>de</strong>rable<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>t when the objective is to sample a large region <strong>for</strong> a long<br />

time period. To improve the rate of specimen collection, non-specialist<br />

taxonomic workers – or para-taxonomists – can separate morpho-species<br />

instead of i<strong>de</strong>ntifying valid species. This solution is advocated by the rapid<br />

biodiversity assessment (RBA) programs that have been especially <strong>de</strong>veloped<br />

<strong>for</strong> the rapid exploration of biodiversity in tropical habitats (Oliver<br />

and Beattie, 1993; 1996; Oliver et al., 2000).<br />

Biodiversity assessment is often restricted to species richness, i.e. to the<br />

counting of the total number of species. However, a collection of species<br />

cannot be <strong>de</strong>scribed solely by the number of items it inclu<strong>de</strong>s. The<br />

abundance of each species has to be assessed to provi<strong>de</strong> an estimation of<br />

species evenness. Evolutionary, ecological and life history characters of<br />

the species also <strong>de</strong>scribe facets of biodiversity (Brooks and McLennan,<br />

1991; Vane-Wright et al., 1991; Grandcolas, 1998; Pavoine et al., 2009;<br />

Petchey et al., 2009). Species turnover along time and/or spatial scales<br />

is also required to take into account biodiversity dynamics. All of these<br />

requirements led to a plethora of biodiversity indices that have been <strong>de</strong>veloped<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s (Magurran, 2004; Buckland et al., 2005; Pavoine and<br />

Bonsall, 2010).<br />

In practice, a measure of biodiversity can be achieved with direct or indirect<br />

sampling. In the latter case, the use of a sensor should be i<strong>de</strong>ally consi<strong>de</strong>red<br />

by employing a simple tool that returns an in<strong>de</strong>x of biodiversity. A<br />

human observer or a network of human observers might be consi<strong>de</strong>red as<br />

a “biodiversity sensor”, but may be biased by the experience of the observers<br />

and cannot be “<strong>de</strong>ployed” in rough terrains <strong>for</strong> long periods of time.<br />

Another possibility is to work with local image, vi<strong>de</strong>o capture instruments<br />

or with global satellite imagery. Satellite-based earth observations,<br />

or remote sensing, can produce environmental parameters from biophysical<br />

characteristics that can be indirectly used to assess species ranges and<br />

species richness patterns (Kerr et al., 2003, Turner et al., 2003; Wang et<br />

al., 2010; see also IV, 2). These methods are undoubtedly very attractive,<br />

but they rely on extremely expensive equipment and are difficult to adapt<br />

to small spatial scales. Like other methods, remote sensing often requires<br />

a time-consuming validation step. For instance, vegetation mapping with<br />

satellite images is based on a colorimetric calibration of pixels with a large<br />

set of direct vegetation samples.<br />

The use of a given sensor should be ma<strong>de</strong> according to a sampling strategy<br />

<strong>de</strong>signed and evaluated carefully with respect to the type of data to


Part II – Chapter 1 101<br />

be collected. It is particularly important to i<strong>de</strong>ntify the precision of the<br />

measurement system (data quality) and the level of accuracy that has to<br />

be reached along both time and space scales (data quantity). In most sampling<br />

strategies, there is a basic tra<strong>de</strong>-off between precision and accuracy.<br />

In this context, we are currently <strong>de</strong>veloping an acoustic sensor that would<br />

produce a biodiversity in<strong>de</strong>x by analysing the sound produced by local<br />

animal communities. This approach could provi<strong>de</strong> a portable, cheap, reasonably<br />

accurate and non-invasive animal diversity sensor that could be<br />

used at different space and time scales.<br />

2. Sensing diversity through bioacoustics<br />

Some animal species, including taxa often used in biodiversity studies,<br />

produce active sounds during their social interactions or in other contexts.<br />

For example, some fish and reptiles, most amphibians, birds, mammals,<br />

insects and other arthropods use sound <strong>for</strong> communication, navigation or<br />

predation acts. These acoustic signals generally produce a species-specific<br />

signature and several techniques in bioacoustics were <strong>de</strong>veloped to exploit<br />

these signals as an indication of species occurrence and as a tool <strong>for</strong> biodiversity<br />

studies (Obrist et al., 2010). The most elementary application is<br />

sensing by observers. This is usually achieved when following animal populations<br />

through aural listening and i<strong>de</strong>ntification (e.g., Cano-Santana<br />

et al., 2008, <strong>for</strong> crickets). When based on a massive network of listeners,<br />

such a census method can generate large datasets of strong interest to<br />

ecologists (e.g. Devictor et al., 2008, <strong>for</strong> birds). Nonetheless, volunteerbased<br />

call surveys tend to be replaced by the automated digital recording<br />

system (ADRS), which is an electronic equipment that allows automatic<br />

data collection and generates a large amount of high-quality in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

about species biodiversity (e.g. Acevedo and Villanueva-Rivera, 2006, <strong>for</strong><br />

amphibians).<br />

The problems allu<strong>de</strong>d above <strong>for</strong> species i<strong>de</strong>ntification with museum<br />

specimens is also true <strong>for</strong> species i<strong>de</strong>ntification with sound. Acoustic<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntification is based on the experience of the observers, which can be<br />

biased due to sensory or training differences. As any other i<strong>de</strong>ntification,<br />

it also relies on a taxonomic database providing in<strong>for</strong>mation on the correspon<strong>de</strong>nce<br />

between every species and its acoustic signature. Automatic<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntification of the different songs embed<strong>de</strong>d in the recording is rather<br />

complex and still suffers errors (e.g. Skowronski and Harris, 2006, <strong>for</strong><br />

bats). These approaches are also difficult to <strong>de</strong>ploy in complex acoustic<br />

environments like tropical <strong>for</strong>est soundscapes, where tens of signals mix<br />

up and many species still remain unknown (Rie<strong>de</strong>, 1993). Reliable results<br />

can be obtained only when focusing on a single species with a rather


102 Biodiversity<br />

simple and loud call as <strong>de</strong>monstrated with the neotropical bird Lipaugus<br />

vociferans (see I, 4) and the Blue Whale Balaenoptera musculus in a marine<br />

context (see I, 3).<br />

Keeping in mind these constraints, we applied the concept of RBA to<br />

sounds produced by animals and even pushed the concept one step further.<br />

We recently suggested tackling the problem of diversity assessment at<br />

the community level by using bioacoustic methods (Sueur et al., 2008a).<br />

In the case of bioacoustics, the unit to work with is the acoustic community,<br />

which is <strong>de</strong>fined as the sum of all sounds produced by animals<br />

at given location and time. The signals produced by different species can<br />

overlap, interfere and consequently reduce signal transmission between<br />

the emitter and the receiver of a focal species. Sound produced by other<br />

species is in<strong>de</strong>ed consi<strong>de</strong>red as noise <strong>for</strong> the focal species and acts as a<br />

severe constraint on the evolution of conspecific signals (Brumm and<br />

Slabbekoorn, 2005). Consequently, species sharing the same acoustic<br />

space are supposed to show an over-dispersion of the frequency and timeamplitu<strong>de</strong><br />

parameters of their songs reducing the risk of interference. This<br />

has been reported in several acoustic communities (e.g., Lüd<strong>de</strong>cke et al.,<br />

2000, <strong>for</strong> amphibians; Sueur, 2002, <strong>for</strong> cicadas; Luther, 2009, <strong>for</strong> birds).<br />

A measure of sound complexity could then work as a proxy of community<br />

richness and composition. The acoustic indices we are <strong>de</strong>veloping<br />

are mainly based on this concept of acoustic partitioning. We hereafter<br />

review the recording equipment and analysis we used to try and build an<br />

animal diversity acoustic sensor.<br />

3. Listening and measuring acoustic diversity<br />

A biodiversity sensor provi<strong>de</strong>s a measure of a single or a set of variables<br />

characterising biodiversity. Even if a sensor is composed of several probes<br />

and data analysers, it is often viewed as a all-in-one equipment that senses<br />

and analyses the environment concomitantly. Our method currently<br />

relies on two different equipments that are not used at the same time.<br />

However, we here consi<strong>de</strong>r that these sub-units constitute together a single<br />

sensor (figure 1). The first sub-unit is a digital sound-recor<strong>de</strong>r that can be<br />

settled outdoor. The second sub-unit is a computer installed with software<br />

specifically <strong>de</strong>veloped to analyse sound diversity. Further statistical<br />

analyses on the acoustic indices, i.e. the biodiversity variables measured<br />

by the sensor, are not consi<strong>de</strong>red as part of the sensor but as part of data<br />

analysis processes. We hereafter <strong>de</strong>tail the sampling protocols based on<br />

a single recor<strong>de</strong>r or an array of recor<strong>de</strong>rs, the properties of the autonomous<br />

recor<strong>de</strong>r currently in use and, eventually, the algorithm <strong>de</strong>veloped<br />

to compute the diversity indices from sound files.


Part II – Chapter 1 103<br />

Figure 1: Diagram showing the successive steps of the global estimation of animal<br />

diversity. Here, the biodiversity sensor is consi<strong>de</strong>red as the combination of different<br />

processes: recording, audio file conservation, signal analysis, and indices<br />

computation. These processes – in situ recording step with autonomous equipment<br />

and ex situ calculation of indices from stored acoustic data – are currently separated<br />

from each other. However, a portable all-in-one system might be <strong>de</strong>veloped in the<br />

future.<br />

3.1. From a single manual recording spot to a network of autonomous<br />

recor<strong>de</strong>rs<br />

The sampling protocol is mainly constrained by the recording equipment<br />

available. Our method was first tested with a comparison between two<br />

closely spaced dry lowland coastal <strong>for</strong>ests in Tanzania. The recording<br />

of the animal communities inhabiting these <strong>for</strong>ests was achieved with a<br />

digital recor<strong>de</strong>r (Edirol© R09) equipped with an omnidirectional microphone<br />

(Sennheiser© K6/ME62). Recordings were done by a single person<br />

at three times of the day and successively in the two <strong>for</strong>ests. This procedure<br />

limited the sampling to a few days and to only two sampling sites.<br />

Such digital recor<strong>de</strong>rs also provi<strong>de</strong> internal microphones that can be used<br />

to reduce costs. In this case, several items can be purchased to cover a<br />

wi<strong>de</strong>r area and a longer period of time. However, the recor<strong>de</strong>rs still have<br />

to be triggered and stopped manually, a condition that makes field work<br />

rather challenging.<br />

Unatten<strong>de</strong>d recor<strong>de</strong>rs were not available since the North American company<br />

Wildlife Acoustics© provi<strong>de</strong>d an autonomous digital field recor<strong>de</strong>r<br />

(see <strong>de</strong>tails about this recording package in section 3.2). An autonomous<br />

system was absolutely necessary to <strong>de</strong>sign sampling protocols with synchronised<br />

units such as regular, cluster, multi-level, or stratified protocols.<br />

We first used three of these recor<strong>de</strong>rs to assess animal diversity within temperate<br />

woodlands by simultaneously recording a mature <strong>for</strong>est, a young<br />

<strong>for</strong>est and an edge <strong>for</strong>est (figure 2A, Depraetere et al., 2012). We then<br />

increased the number of recor<strong>de</strong>rs to estimate biodiversity en<strong>de</strong>mism of<br />

three New-Caledonian sites. We planned a stratified sampling with four<br />

recor<strong>de</strong>rs set in each site. This ensured a repetition per site and allowed<br />

comparisons within and between study sites (figure 2B). Later, we tracked<br />

acoustic diversity of a typical tropical <strong>for</strong>est by <strong>de</strong>ploying a network of 12


104 Biodiversity<br />

recor<strong>de</strong>rs regularly spaced on a 100 ×100m grid in French Guiana (see IV,<br />

2). Each recor<strong>de</strong>r was equipped with a microphone settled 1.5m high and<br />

a second microphone placed 20m high in the canopy (figure 2C). This 3D<br />

regular sampling covered 12ha of <strong>for</strong>est <strong>for</strong> more than 40 days. Eventually,<br />

we tried to transfer our method to freshwater habitats like <strong>for</strong>est ponds.<br />

This was achieved by adapting the autonomous recor<strong>de</strong>r with a Reson©<br />

hydrophone and an Avisoft© pre-amplifier (figure 2D). This high-quality<br />

equipment is expensive (about 2700€ per unit) and sampling was there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

limited to three recording units. We there<strong>for</strong>e <strong>de</strong>signed a rotating<br />

sampling by regularly moving the hydrophone position along transects.<br />

Figure 2: The autonomous Wildlife Acoustics© recor<strong>de</strong>r installed <strong>for</strong> outdoor<br />

studies. A. First version of the recor<strong>de</strong>r (SM1) settled in a temperate woodland<br />

to estimate local bird acoustic community (Rambouillet, France). B. Second<br />

version of the recor<strong>de</strong>r (SM2) with a single microphone in action (Mandjelia, New-<br />

Caledonia). C. The same recor<strong>de</strong>r with two microphones, one 2 m high and the<br />

other one ready to be set 20 m up in the canopy (Nouragues experimental station,<br />

French Guiana). D. Recor<strong>de</strong>r connected to an hydrophone to record un<strong>de</strong>rwater<br />

sound of a pond (Rambouillet, France).<br />

3.2. The Song Meter: an autonomous acoustic sensor<br />

Wildlife Acoustics© <strong>de</strong>veloped two generations of autonomous digital<br />

recor<strong>de</strong>rs, namely the Song Meter SM1 and SM2 (figure 3). These stereo<br />

recor<strong>de</strong>rs, which weigh 1.6kg each and measure 20.3 × 20.3 × 6.4cm,


Part II – Chapter 1 105<br />

possess a stereo recording system with omnidirectional microphones<br />

that have a flat frequency response between 0.02 and 20kHz. These<br />

microphones can be directly connected to the main box, where data are<br />

stored, or can be settled up to 50m away from it. Given that terrestrial<br />

animals produce sound with an intensity of ca. 80dB at 1m re. 2×10 -5<br />

μPa (Sueur, unpublished data) and given that the microphones have a<br />

sensitivity of -36 ± 4dB, we can estimate that in a closed habitat, such<br />

as a <strong>for</strong>est, the microphone <strong>de</strong>tects sounds up to around 100m from the<br />

source. A SM2 plat<strong>for</strong>m would then cover an area of approximatively<br />

3,1ha.<br />

The recording sampling rate can be set from 4 to 48kHz with the standard<br />

SM2 and up to 384kHz with the ultrasonic SM2 option. The SM2<br />

recor<strong>de</strong>rs are currently working with a lossless compression <strong>for</strong>mat (.wac)<br />

that can be written on four secure digital (SD) cards. The four SD slots<br />

provi<strong>de</strong> 128Go storage space. Choosing an a<strong>de</strong>quate sampling rate is not<br />

an easy task as it results from a tra<strong>de</strong>-off between cost, data storage and<br />

the sound frequency used by animals. Increasing the sampling rate to high<br />

frequency requires a specific and expensive motherboard and, above all,<br />

generates very large sound files that are difficult to handle and to analyse.<br />

However, this is the only solution to record the acoustic activity of<br />

some insects and bats that emit ultrasound signals <strong>for</strong> communication or<br />

navigation. Up to now, we sampled the animal acoustic communities at<br />

a 44.1kHz sampling rate. A network of recor<strong>de</strong>rs generates thousands of<br />

files that need to be stored and analysed (see section 4.2). Using a higher<br />

sampling rate will certainly preclu<strong>de</strong> the estimation of acoustic diversity<br />

by generating too high an amount of data.<br />

Electrical power is provi<strong>de</strong>d by four alkaline or LR20 batteries ensuring<br />

a maximum of 240 hours of recordings. Energy can also come from an<br />

external 12V battery potentially connected to a solar panel. Eventually,<br />

the SM2 plat<strong>for</strong>m provi<strong>de</strong>s also an internal temperature sensor and a<br />

connection <strong>for</strong> an external sensor. The additional data are written on<br />

the SD cards together with sound files. The main advantage of the<br />

Song Meter is that it can be easily programmed to record on simple<br />

time-of-day schedules or to implement complex monitoring protocols,<br />

even scheduling recordings relative to local sunrise, sunset and twilight.<br />

For instance, a schedule can be programmed to record regularly all day<br />

and night long, but also to record more intensively around sunrise and<br />

sunset, when dawn and dusk choruses of birds, insects and amphibians<br />

occur.


106 Biodiversity<br />

Figure 3: The second version of the recor<strong>de</strong>r (SM2) opened to show the main<br />

characteristics. A cable can be used to set the microphones away from the main<br />

box. Detailed characteristics can be obtained at http://www.wildlifeacoustics.com.<br />

© Wildlife Acoustics.<br />

3.3. Computing the acoustic indices<br />

Biodiversity is traditionally <strong>de</strong>composed into two levels, the average<br />

diversity within communities, or α diversity, and the diversity between<br />

communities, or β diversity. We there<strong>for</strong>e <strong>de</strong>veloped two acoustic indices<br />

aiming at estimating these two components of biodiversity (Sueur et al.,<br />

2008a). Both indices can be computed with the package seewave (Sueur et<br />

al., 2008b) of the free R environment (R Development Core Team, 2012).<br />

The first in<strong>de</strong>x, named H, is a Shannon-like in<strong>de</strong>x. The in<strong>de</strong>x H gives a<br />

measure of the entropy of the acoustic community by consi<strong>de</strong>ring both<br />

temporal and frequency entropy. H is computed according to:<br />

H = Ht × Hf with 0 ≤ H ≤ 1, and<br />

Ht = - ∑ (A(t) × log(A(t)) / log (n)), and<br />

Hf = - ∑ (S( f ) × log(S( f )) / log (N)),<br />

where n = length of the signal in number of digitized points, A(t) = probability<br />

mass function of the amplitu<strong>de</strong> envelope, S( f ) = probability mass<br />

function of the mean spectrum calculated using a short term Fourier<br />

trans<strong>for</strong>m (STFT) along the signal with a non-overlapping Hamming window<br />

of N = 512 points (figure 4).


Part II – Chapter 1 107<br />

Figure 4: The main two trans<strong>for</strong>ms used on raw recordings. A. Wave<strong>for</strong>m or<br />

oscillogram of a sound recording. b. Amplitu<strong>de</strong> envelope, A(t), obtained through<br />

the Hilbert trans<strong>for</strong>m. C. Mean spectrum, S( f ), obtained through a Fourier<br />

trans<strong>for</strong>m. Note the different x axes and that all y axes are in relative amplitu<strong>de</strong><br />

along a linear scale.<br />

The H in<strong>de</strong>x increases logarithmically from 0 to 1 with species richness<br />

and evenness when consi<strong>de</strong>ring species-specific calls (Sueur et al., 2008a).<br />

The in<strong>de</strong>x will be particularly high <strong>for</strong> a signal that has a flat amplitu<strong>de</strong><br />

envelope and a flat frequency spectrum. When only consi<strong>de</strong>ring the spectral<br />

component of the in<strong>de</strong>x, a flat or multi-peak spectrum will give a<br />

higher Hf in<strong>de</strong>x than a single peak spectrum (figure 5 A, b). The H in<strong>de</strong>x<br />

was applied in Tanzania, and correctly revealed a higher acoustic diversity<br />

in the preserved part of the <strong>for</strong>est than in the disturbed part (Sueur et al.,<br />

2008a). However, Hf is not reliable when <strong>de</strong>aling with recordings ma<strong>de</strong> in<br />

the temperate woodland, where the acoustic activity is low and polluted


108 Biodiversity<br />

with environmental noise. In this particular case, we <strong>de</strong>veloped another<br />

in<strong>de</strong>x, named Acoustic Richness AR which was computed according to:<br />

AR = rank(Ht) × rank(M) × n -2 , with 0 ≤ AR ≤ 1,<br />

where rank is the value position along the or<strong>de</strong>red samples, M is the median<br />

of the amplitu<strong>de</strong> envelope and n the number of recordings (Depraetere et<br />

al., 2012).<br />

The second in<strong>de</strong>x, named D, is a simple acoustic dissimilarity measure.<br />

D is similarly composed of two sub-indices based on a difference between<br />

amplitu<strong>de</strong> envelopes and frequency spectra respectively (figure 5 C). D is<br />

calculated like following:<br />

D = Dt × Df with 0 ≤ D ≤ 1, and<br />

Dt = 0.5 × ∑ |A 1<br />

(t) – A 2<br />

(t)|, and<br />

Df = 0.5 × ∑ |S 1<br />

( f ) – S 2<br />

( f )|,<br />

where A 1<br />

(t), A 2<br />

(t) are probability mass functions of the amplitu<strong>de</strong> envelope<br />

<strong>for</strong> the two recordings un<strong>de</strong>r comparison, and S 1<br />

( f ), S 2<br />

( f ) are probability<br />

mass functions of the mean spectrum <strong>for</strong> the two recordings to be<br />

compared. The D in<strong>de</strong>x increases linearly with the number of unshared<br />

species between the two recordings, or communities (Sueur et al., 2008a).<br />

Both indices may suffer a bias as some species naturally produce signals<br />

with high temporal and/or spectral entropy. This is particularly the case<br />

of cicadas whose noise-like sound can be mistakenly interpreted as a high<br />

local diversity. Such bias can be buffered with a large sampling including<br />

a high number of time and space repetitions. The indices can also produce<br />

false values when background noise overlaps with the sound produced by<br />

the animal community (see section 4.1). Both indices are currently tested<br />

in different temperate and tropical habitats in this respect.<br />

Other acoustic indices have been <strong>de</strong>veloped elsewhere to monitor habitat<br />

state or community activity. Qi et al. (2008) divi<strong>de</strong>d the soundscape of an<br />

ecosystem following three frequency bands: the anthrophony, between<br />

0.2 and 1.5kHz, the biophony, which starts at 2kHz with a peak at 8kHz,<br />

and the geophony, which can cover the entire spectrum with dominant<br />

low frequency. By computing a ratio between biological and anthropogenic<br />

signals, they coined an ecological estimator of ecosystem health.<br />

This original procedure does not give an estimation of local diversity but<br />

assesses the level of biological sound activity relative to anthropogenic<br />

activities. Pierreti et al. (2010) and Farina et al. (2011) <strong>de</strong>signed an acoustic<br />

complexity in<strong>de</strong>x (ACI). This in<strong>de</strong>x computes time and frequency variability<br />

of a sound extrapolated from a spectrogram. The ACI appears to<br />

be correlated with the number of vocalisations produced by a bird community.<br />

However, this in<strong>de</strong>x assesses neither species diversity nor community<br />

turnover. The ACI in<strong>de</strong>x proved to be poorly sensitive to invariant<br />

noise, such as continuous noise from cars or aircrafts, but can be impacted


Part II – Chapter 1 109<br />

by unpredictable noise such as wind, running water or irregular human<br />

activity. All these acoustic indices, including H, D, and others in current<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment probably do not quantify the same facet of animal acoustic<br />

diversity.<br />

Figure 5: Illustration of a spectral analysis on recordings ma<strong>de</strong> in two sites in New-<br />

Caledonia (France). A. A recording showing a broadband frequency spectrum<br />

with a high H f<br />

in<strong>de</strong>x and a high number of peaks. b. A recording with a single<br />

dominant frequency peak generating a lower H f<br />

in<strong>de</strong>x and less frequency peaks. C.<br />

The difference between the two spectra used to compute the D f<br />

in<strong>de</strong>x.


110 Biodiversity<br />

4. Sensitivity to noise level, sensor size and autonomy<br />

4.1. Everything but noise<br />

Background noise is probably the primary issue in bioacoustics. Noise can<br />

significantly impairs acoustic observations and experiments by masking<br />

or distorting both time-amplitu<strong>de</strong> and frequency parameters (Hartmann,<br />

1998; Vaseghi, 2000). There are three main sources of noise to consi<strong>de</strong>r<br />

when recording outdoor: i) anthropogenic noise due to machinery, car,<br />

boat, plane, train traffic, or any other human activity, ii) biotic noise due<br />

to the activity of surrounding species, and iii) environmental noise due to<br />

rain, wind, river stream, waterfall, or sea wave (Brumm and Slabbekoorn,<br />

2005; Laiolo, 2010). The estimation of animal diversity through acoustics<br />

is based on the recording of a whole community and as such does not face<br />

the classical problems encountered when trying to record a single species in<br />

the background noise generated by surrounding active species. However,<br />

anthropogenic and environmental noise can have negative effects on the<br />

results. In a few instances, anthropogenic noise can be removed by applying<br />

classical frequency filters (Stoddard, 1998). Recordings ma<strong>de</strong> close to<br />

an airport or a road with a regular traffic can be cleaned with a high-pass<br />

filter that will remove the low frequency band generated by plane or car<br />

engines. Such filters might exclu<strong>de</strong> low pitch animal calling songs, but<br />

this can be accounted <strong>for</strong> when computing diversity indices. The main<br />

difficulty arises when recordings are polluted with unpredictable and/or<br />

broadband noise that can be interpreted erroneously as animal sounds.<br />

Removing such chaotic sound is a challenge to be solved in bioacoustics<br />

as well as in other acoustic disciplines (Rumsey and McCormick, 1992;<br />

Hartmann, 1998; Stoddard, 1998; Vaseghi, 2000). Usual frequency filters<br />

cannot be used as noise may overlap the frequency band used by the animal<br />

community. Other noise reduction algorithms use noise spectrum as<br />

a reference to be convoluted with the original signal. This solution might<br />

appear elegant but still suffers important limitations. First, the noise has<br />

to be constant in its frequency content, a condition rarely met in a natural<br />

acoustic environment. Second, it is necessary to i<strong>de</strong>ntify accurately a time<br />

window where only noise occurs. This latter condition is very difficult to<br />

meet when faced with hundreds or thousands of recordings.<br />

Fortunately, some upstream solutions can be consi<strong>de</strong>red to reduce the<br />

anthropogenic and environmental noise (Obrist et al., 2010). When using<br />

an outdoor acoustic sensor, the most important parameter to consi<strong>de</strong>r<br />

is the direction and the protection of the microphone. The microphone<br />

can be oriented in a horizontal or vertical position as soon as its directivity<br />

pattern is omnidirectional. A vertical upward position should be<br />

avoi<strong>de</strong>d when possible, as rain drops might directly strike the microphone


Part II – Chapter 1 111<br />

membrane. A vertical upsi<strong>de</strong>-down orientation might be the best solution<br />

in avoiding rain and lateral wind effects. More generally, adapting<br />

the orientation of the microphone to the local main sources of noises is<br />

usually advocated. For instance, the noise of running water or passing-by<br />

cars can be reduced by orienting the microphone perpendicularly to the<br />

source, and windscreens should be used to attenuate wind noise. Another<br />

upstream solution is to exclu<strong>de</strong> data potentially corrupted with environmental<br />

noise. This can be achieved in three ways. The first option consists<br />

in cutting off the recording session when weather conditions are too bad.<br />

It is not yet available but could certainly be implemented quickly, given<br />

the availability of climate sensors in sound meter <strong>de</strong>vices. The second<br />

option is to apply a signal-to-noise algorithm that indicates the occurrence<br />

of an important background noise. A threshold could be used as a reference<br />

to keep or to remove the files from the dataset. This solution is un<strong>de</strong>r<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment in our group. The third and last option, which is currently in<br />

use, is to gather climatic parameters from a local station and i<strong>de</strong>ntify the<br />

time periods when the weather was too bad to allow a correct estimation<br />

of the acoustic diversity. This i<strong>de</strong>ntification can be achieved automatically<br />

with a threshold applied on the climatic parameters or by running<br />

a redundancy analysis (RDA, Rao, 1964) to the acoustic indices with the<br />

climatic parameters as factors (Depraetere et al., 2012).<br />

4.2. Optimal size of recor<strong>de</strong>rs<br />

As <strong>de</strong>scribed above, the SM2 recor<strong>de</strong>r weighs around 1.6kg and can<br />

be fitted with two microphones (figure 3). Hence, handling several of<br />

these units in a hard-to-reach environment requires a significant ef<strong>for</strong>t.<br />

A reduced size and weight would make field work easier and could also<br />

allow settling more units in the habitat. However, this has to be tra<strong>de</strong>d<br />

off against the size of the data that needs to be stored and analysed. A<br />

typical .wav file, which is the most popular uncompressed audio <strong>for</strong>mat,<br />

has a size of around 690kb/s (= 84ko/s) when sampled at a 44.01kHz rate.<br />

This means that one minute of recording is roughly equivalent to 5Mo<br />

<strong>for</strong> a single channel (mono) or around 10Mo <strong>for</strong> two channels (stereo).<br />

Sampling quickly generates x×10 2 hours of recording in x×10 3 files <strong>for</strong> a<br />

total x×10 2 Go data. As <strong>de</strong>tailed above, the recor<strong>de</strong>rs have storage capacity<br />

of 128Go, which is enough <strong>for</strong> most applications sampled at 44.01kHz,<br />

but might appear limited <strong>for</strong> an over-month or over-year survey or <strong>for</strong> a<br />

long ultrasound monitoring. The next step of data transfer onto a hard<br />

disk <strong>for</strong> storage and conservation can take a significant time as writing<br />

speed is usually slow (around 6Mb/s = 0.7Mo/s). Eventually, the longterm<br />

storage of teraoctets of data can encounter some limits with a standard<br />

hard disk or server capacity.


112 Biodiversity<br />

Regarding the calculation of indices, the larger the file, the slower the<br />

analysis process. Even if automated with R scripts, the analysis of thousands<br />

sound files is time-consuming. This is due to three main factors:<br />

i) the number of files to be analysed, ii) the size of each file, and iii) the<br />

time taken by R to work with large files. There is no easy way yet to counteract<br />

these three caveats. The number of files will increase as samples will<br />

be larger. The size of each file cannot be reduced. Compressed <strong>for</strong>mats<br />

in particular, such as .mp3, cannot be used <strong>for</strong> obvious reasons of signal<br />

quality. The plat<strong>for</strong>m R is very convenient as it is free and open-source. It<br />

makes it a perfect tool <strong>for</strong> sharing our research and transferring our techniques<br />

to other laboratories. However, it may be relevant to look <strong>for</strong> other<br />

software solutions (see section 5.2).<br />

4.3. Energy<br />

The SM2 recor<strong>de</strong>r was <strong>de</strong>veloped to consume as less energy as possible,<br />

but current batteries ensure 240 hours of recording and there<strong>for</strong>e put a<br />

strong limit on the duration of sampling. A solution is to connect the<br />

recor<strong>de</strong>r with a 12V battery fuelled with solar energy. However, if such<br />

autonomous energy system properly works in sunny areas, it is not adapted<br />

to cloudy or sha<strong>de</strong>d areas like the un<strong>de</strong>rstory of a tropical <strong>for</strong>est where a<br />

very low percentage of solar radiation reaches the ground.<br />

5. What’s next?<br />

5.1. Sampling<br />

Our method needs to be tested, validated and eventually applied in several<br />

acoustic conditions from different habitats. So far, we have tested it<br />

with both simulated and field acoustic communities (Sueur et al., 2008a;<br />

Depraetere et al., 2012). Tests on field communities concerned African<br />

tropical coast <strong>for</strong>est and temperate <strong>for</strong>est habitats. The latter test implied<br />

a modification of the indices to take into account the background noise<br />

and the low activity of the acoustic community. We are currently sampling<br />

several other places including mountain tropical <strong>for</strong>ests in New<br />

Caledonia, neotropical evergreen <strong>for</strong>est in French Guiana, and evergreen<br />

monsoon <strong>for</strong>est in India. We are also transferring the technique to freshwater<br />

habitats by using hydrophones immerged in ponds.<br />

One of the aims of our method is to provi<strong>de</strong> a long-term and large-scale<br />

sampling. We are currently sampling species diversity with a network of<br />

10-16 sensors working about 40 days long over approximately 16 ha of<br />

tropical <strong>for</strong>est in French Guiana and India. This time period is too short


Part II – Chapter 1 113<br />

to track seasonal variations of species diversity. We would like to extend it<br />

to at least one year or even longer periods. Moreover, we plan to increase<br />

the number of sensors to monitor a larger area. Increasing the sampling<br />

time and network size will generate serious storage issues. A cut-off system<br />

that stops recordings when the meteorological conditions are not good<br />

enough could constitute a nice and cheap solution to overcome this difficulty.<br />

Another way could consist in sending directly the data from the<br />

recor<strong>de</strong>r to a server through a satellite connection, as wireless connection<br />

to a base radio may be too slow <strong>for</strong> heavy sound files (see IV, 2 section<br />

2.3). However such technological improvement mainly <strong>de</strong>pends on<br />

the industry and may take some time to emerge.<br />

5.2. Improving the indices<br />

As explained earlier, background noise is a central issue, and our indices,<br />

especially the in<strong>de</strong>x H, are particularly sensitive to noise. It is there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

necessary to <strong>de</strong>velop new indices that are noise-resistant. Current research<br />

is ongoing in our laboratory to <strong>de</strong>velop a new measurement of the richness<br />

based on the frequency peaks of the Fourier spectrum (figure 5).<br />

The spectrum can be smoothed or residual peaks due to noise can be<br />

filtered out so as to improve the measure in case of rain or wind noise.<br />

Amplitu<strong>de</strong> or frequency threshold will be also applied on the envelope<br />

and the frequency spectrum respectively, to try to increase the signal-tonoise<br />

ratio. Whatever the in<strong>de</strong>x in use is, we also need to exactly i<strong>de</strong>ntify<br />

which biodiversity in<strong>for</strong>mation is collected by using the acoustic community<br />

as a proxy of animal diversity. Does the H in<strong>de</strong>x only embed a<br />

richness-evenness value or does it inclu<strong>de</strong> phylogenetic and/or functional<br />

diversity in<strong>for</strong>mation? Eventually, as outlined above, the signal analysis<br />

can be slow due to R process. Software directly written in C language<br />

will be <strong>de</strong>veloped on the next years to significantly speed up the analysis<br />

process.<br />

5.3 Sharing the method with other scientists and citizens<br />

There is an important ethical requirement <strong>for</strong> making available the bioacoustic<br />

sensor and primary biodiversity data <strong>for</strong> later uses in terms of<br />

knowledge, engineering or conservation (e.g. Graham et al., 2004; Suarez<br />

and Tsutsui, 2004). The recording equipment we used so far can be purchased<br />

to the company Wildlife Acoustics©. The H and D in<strong>de</strong>x can be<br />

computed with the free R package seewave. The sensor and integrated bioacoustic<br />

system is there<strong>for</strong>e available to anyone. However, R does not have<br />

a user-friendly interface and we plan there<strong>for</strong>e to share the method soon<br />

through an interactive website. Any user will be able to upload recording


114 Biodiversity<br />

files <strong>for</strong> analysis. The acoustic indices will be returned to the user together<br />

with an optional graphical representation of the sound analysed (e.g.,<br />

wave<strong>for</strong>m, envelope, spectrogram, spectrum). On a long-term scale, the<br />

recor<strong>de</strong>r and the signal analysis would not be separated but associated in<br />

a small and light all-in-one system. This system could be a ‘smartphone’<br />

including a free application that computes the indices. Smartphones were<br />

proved to work as nice sensors <strong>for</strong> mapping the noise level of European cities<br />

(Maisonneuve et al., 2010). A similar citizen-science experience could<br />

be un<strong>de</strong>rtaken to assess animal acoustic diversity insi<strong>de</strong> or around cities.<br />

Authors’ references<br />

Jérôme Sueur, Amandine Gasc, Philippe Grandcolas:<br />

Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Département Systématique et<br />

Évolution, UMR 7205 Paris, France<br />

Sandrine Pavoine:<br />

Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Département Écologie et Gestion<br />

<strong>de</strong> la Biodiversité, UMR 7204 Paris, France<br />

Corresponding author: Jérôme Sueur, sueur@mnhn.fr<br />

Aknowledgement<br />

This research has been supported by the INEE (CNRS) with a PEPS program<br />

and a PhD grant awar<strong>de</strong>d to AG. Sampling in French Guiana was<br />

achieved thanks to a CNRS Nouragues 2010 grant. Sampling in New<br />

Caledonia was realised thanks to the ANR BIONEOCAL grant to PG.<br />

Main part of research was financed with the FRB BIOSOUND grant<br />

(Fondation pour la Recherche sur le Biodiversité). Marion Depraetere,<br />

Vincent Devictor, Stéphanie Duvail, Olivier Hamerlynck, Frédéric Jiguet,<br />

Isabelle Leviol, Pierre-Yves Martel, and Raphaël Pélissier participated at<br />

different steps to the <strong>de</strong>velopment of this new sensing method or provi<strong>de</strong>d<br />

field data with which to compare our acoustic indices.<br />

References<br />

Acevedo M.A., Villanueva-Rivera L.J., 2006. Using automated digital recording<br />

systems as effective tools <strong>for</strong> the monitoring of birds and amphibians.<br />

Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34, pp. 211-214.


Part II – Chapter 1 115<br />

Brooks D. R., McLennan D. A., 1991. Phylogeny, <strong>ecology</strong>, and behavior: a<br />

research program in comparative biology. University of Chicago Press,<br />

Chicago, USA.<br />

Brumm H., Slabbekoorn H., 2005. Acoustic communication in noise. Advances<br />

in the Study of Behavior, 35, pp. 151-209.<br />

Buckland S. T., Magurran A. E., Green R. E., Fewster R. M., 2005. Monitoring<br />

change in biodiversity through composite indices. Philosophical<br />

Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 360, pp. 243-254.<br />

Cano-Santana Z., Romero-Mata, A., Perez-Escobedo H. M., 2008. Modified<br />

Petraborg in<strong>de</strong>x applied to the sampling of male crickets by aural <strong>de</strong>tection.<br />

Journal of Orthoptera Research, 17, pp. 111-112.<br />

Depraetere M., Pavoine S., Jiguet F., Gasc A., Duvail S., Sueur, J., 2012.<br />

Monitoring animal diversity using acoustic indices: implementation in a<br />

temperate woodland. Ecological Indicators, 13, pp. 46-54.<br />

Devictor V., Julliard R., Couvet D., Jiguet F., 2008. Birds are tracking climate<br />

warning, but not fast enough. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London<br />

B, 275, pp. 2743-2748.<br />

Farina A., Pieretti N., Piccioli L., 2011. The soundscape methodology <strong>for</strong> longterm<br />

bird monitoring: a Mediterranean Europe case-study. Ecological<br />

In<strong>for</strong>matics, 6, pp. 354-363.<br />

Gewin V., 2002. All living things, online. Nature, 418, pp. 362-363.<br />

Graham C. H., Ferrier S., Huettman F., Moritz C., Peterson A. T., 2004.<br />

New <strong>de</strong>velopments in museum-based in<strong>for</strong>matics and applications in<br />

biodiversity analysis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, pp. 497-503.<br />

Grandcolas P., 1998. Phylogenetic analysis and the study of community<br />

structure. Oikos, 82, pp. 397-400.<br />

Hartmann W.M., 1998. Signals, sound, and sensation. Springer, Berlin,<br />

Germany.<br />

Kerr J.T., Ostrovsky M., 2003. From space to species: ecological applications <strong>for</strong><br />

remote sensing. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, pp. 299-305.<br />

Laiolo P., 2010. The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species<br />

conservation. Biological Conservation, 7, pp. 1635-1645.<br />

Lawton J. H., Bignell D. E., Bolton B., Bloemers G. F., Eggleton P., Hammond<br />

P. M., Hodda M., Holt R. D., Larsenk T. B., Mawdsley N. A., Stork N. E.,<br />

Srivastava D. S., Watt A. D., 1998. Biodiversity inventories, indicator<br />

taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical <strong>for</strong>est. Nature, 391,<br />

pp. 72-76.<br />

Lüd<strong>de</strong>cke H., Amézquita A., Bernal X., Guzmàn F., 2000. Partitioning of vocal<br />

activity in a neotropical highland-frog community. Studies on Neotropical<br />

Fauna and Environment, 35, pp. 185-194.<br />

Luther D., 2009. The influence of the acoustic community on songs of birds in<br />

a neotropical rain <strong>for</strong>est. Behavioral Ecology, 20, pp. 864-871.


116 Biodiversity<br />

Magurran A. E., 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science Ltd,<br />

Mal<strong>de</strong>n, USA.<br />

Maisonneuve N., Stevens M., Ochab B., 2010. Participatory noise pollution<br />

monitoring using mobile phones. In<strong>for</strong>mation Polity, 15, pp. 51-71.<br />

Obrist M. K., Pavan G., Sueur J., Rie<strong>de</strong> K., Llusia D., Márquez R., 2010.<br />

Bioacoustics approaches in biodiversity inventories. Abc Taxa, 8, pp. 68-99.<br />

Oliver I., Beattie A.J., 1993. A possible method <strong>for</strong> the rapid assessment of<br />

biodiversity. Conservation Biology, 7, pp. 562-568.<br />

Oliver I., Beattie A.J., 1996. Invertebrate morphospecies as surrogates <strong>for</strong><br />

species: a case study. Conservation Biology, 10, pp. 99-109.<br />

Oliver I., Pik A., Britton D., Dangerfield J. M., Colwel, R. K., Beattie A. J., 2000.<br />

Virtual biodiversity assessment systems. BioScience, 50, pp. 441-450.<br />

Pavoine S., Love M. S., Bonsall M. B., 2009. Hierarchical partitioning of<br />

evolutionary and ecological patterns in the organization of phylogeneticallystructured<br />

species assemblages: application to rockfish (genus: Sebastes) in<br />

the Southern Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Bight. Ecology letters, 12, pp. 898-908.<br />

Pavoine S., Bonsall M. B., 2010. Measuring biodiversity to explain community<br />

assembly: a unified approach. Biological Reviews, 86, pp. 792-812.<br />

Pearson D. L., 1994. Selecting indicator taxa <strong>for</strong> the quantitative assessment of<br />

biodiversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London<br />

B, 345, pp. 75-79.<br />

Petchey O. L., O’Gorman E., Flynn D. F. B., 2009. A functional gui<strong>de</strong> to<br />

functional diversity measures, in: Naeem S., Bunker D., Hector A., Loreau<br />

M., Perrings, C. (Eds) Biodiversity, Ecosystem functioning, and Human<br />

wellbeing: An Ecological and economic perspective. Ox<strong>for</strong>d University<br />

Press, Ox<strong>for</strong>d, pp. 49-60.<br />

Pieretti N., Farina A., Morri F.D., 2010. A new methodology to infer the singing<br />

activity of an avian community: the Acoustic Complexity In<strong>de</strong>x (ACI).<br />

Ecological Indicators, 11, pp. 868-873.<br />

Qi J., Gage S. H., Wooyeong J., Napoletano B., Biswas, S., 2008. Soundscape<br />

characteristics of an environnement. A new ecological indicator of<br />

ecosystem health, in: Wei J. (Ed) Wetland and water resource mo<strong>de</strong>ling and<br />

assessment, a watershed perspective. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 201-211.<br />

R Development Core Team, 2012. The R Project <strong>for</strong> Statistical Computing.<br />

Accessed on February 14, 2012, http://www.r-project.org/.<br />

Rao C. R., 1964. The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in<br />

applied research. Sankhya A, 26, pp. 329-359.<br />

Ricketts T. H., Dinerstein E., Olson D. M., Loucks C., 1999. Who’s where in<br />

North America? BioScience, 49, pp. 369-381.<br />

Rie<strong>de</strong> K., 1993. Monitoring biodiversity: analysis of Amazonian rain<strong>for</strong>est<br />

sounds. Ambio, 22, pp. 546-548.<br />

Rumsey F., McCormick T., 1992. Sound and recording: an introduction. Focal<br />

Press, Boston, USA.


Part II – Chapter 1 117<br />

Skowronski M. D., Harris J. G., 2006. Acoustic <strong>de</strong>tection and classification of<br />

Microchiroptera using machine learning: lessons learned from automatic<br />

speech recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119,<br />

pp. 1817-1833.<br />

Stoddard P. K., 1998. Application of filters in bioacoustics, in: Hopp. S. L.,<br />

Owren M. J., Evans C. S. (Eds) Animal acoustic communication. Springer,<br />

Berlin, pp. 105-127.<br />

Suarez A. V., Tsutsui N. D., 2004. The value of Museum collections <strong>for</strong> research<br />

and society. Bioscience, 54, pp. 66-74.<br />

Sueur J., 2002. Cicada acoustic communication: potential sound partitioning<br />

in a multispecies community from Mexico (Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha:<br />

Cicadidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 75, pp. 379-394.<br />

Sueur J., Pavoine S., Hamerlynck O., Duvail S., 2008a. Rapid acoustic survey<br />

<strong>for</strong> biodiversity appraisal. PloS One, 3, e4065.<br />

Sueur J., Aubin T., Simonis C., 2008b. Seewave: a free modular tool <strong>for</strong> sound<br />

analysis and synthesis. Bioacoustics, 18, pp. 213-226.<br />

Turner W., Spector S., Gardiner N., Fla<strong>de</strong>land M., Sterling E., Steininger M.,<br />

2003. Remote sensing <strong>for</strong> biodiversity science and conservation. Trends in<br />

Ecology and Evolution, 18, pp. 306-314.<br />

Vane-Wright R. I., Humphries C. J., Williams P. H., 1991. What to protect?<br />

– Systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation, 55,<br />

pp. 235-254.<br />

Vaseghi S.V., 2000. Advanced digital signal processing and noise reduction,<br />

second ed. Wiley, Chichester, UK.<br />

Wang K., Franklin S.E., Guo X., Cattet M. 2010. Remote sensing of <strong>ecology</strong>,<br />

biodiversity and conservation: a review from the perspective of remote<br />

sensing specialists. <strong>Sensors</strong>, 10, pp. 9647-9667.<br />

Weaver J.C., 1995. Indicator species and scale of observation. Conservation<br />

Biology, 9, pp. 939-942.


Chapter 2<br />

Assessing the spatial and temporal<br />

distributions of zooplankton and<br />

marine particles using the Un<strong>de</strong>rwater<br />

Vision Profiler<br />

Lars Stemmann, Marc Picheral, Lionel Guidi, Fabien Lombard, Franck Prejger,<br />

Hervé Claustre, Gabriel Gorsky<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The last two <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s, international multidisciplinary programs such as<br />

the Census Of Marine Life (COML), Joint GlObal Flux Studies (JGOFS),<br />

Global Ocean Ecosystem Dynamics (GLOBEC), Integrated Marine<br />

Biogeochemistry and Ecosystem Research (IMBER) conducted numerous<br />

cruises and sampled large areas of the oceans, often focusing on<br />

the first hundred meters of the water column. In parallel, advances in<br />

remote sensing technologies from satellites allowed synoptic <strong>de</strong>scriptions<br />

of some physical and optical properties of the ocean surface used to assess<br />

epipelagic particle biomasses and primary production at a global scale<br />

(see III, 3). By contrast, pelagic ecosystems of mesopelagic water layers –<br />

also known as mid-water (100-1000m) – and <strong>de</strong>eper water layers remain<br />

wi<strong>de</strong>ly unknown. Observing these pelagic ecosystems requires the use of<br />

large and often costly instruments launched from research vessels such<br />

as pumps, multinets, remotely operated vehicles (ROV), or submersibles.<br />

Furthermore, fragile zooplankton (ctenophores, medusae, siphonophores,<br />

appendicularians) or fragile aggregates are <strong>de</strong>stroyed during collection<br />

with plankton nets, in situ water pumps, and/or sediment traps, which prevents<br />

the analysis of their spatial distribution. This challenge can partly<br />

be overcome by using non intrusive un<strong>de</strong>rwater optical and imaging technologies<br />

that appear to be promising tools <strong>for</strong> the study and quantifica-


120 Biodiversity<br />

tion of zooplankton community structures, diversity, as well as marine<br />

particles size spectra.<br />

The <strong>de</strong>scription of the meso- and bathypelagic fauna began to emerge<br />

with the use of ship-tethered cameras hooked on ROV (Lindsay et al.,<br />

2004; Lindsay and Hunt, 2005; Robison, 2004; Robison et al., 2005a;<br />

Steinberg et al., 1997). However, the <strong>de</strong>ployment of these cameras is timeconsuming<br />

and financially expensive, which prevents their wi<strong>de</strong> use.<br />

Smaller instruments hooked on conventional gears – such as a rosette<br />

– or on autonomous plat<strong>for</strong>m – such as gli<strong>de</strong>rs and profilers (see IV, 1),<br />

may be more cost efficient and would provi<strong>de</strong> valuable dataset on the<br />

spatial and temporal distributions of organisms and non living particles.<br />

Relatively few available instruments allow simultaneous in situ measurements<br />

of oceanic particles and zooplankton. Particles can be <strong>de</strong>tected and<br />

measured by the laser in situ scattering and transmissometry (Agrawal and<br />

Pottsmith, 2000) based on scattering intensity. However, this instrument<br />

does not provi<strong>de</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation on the shape of the particles and limits<br />

its use <strong>for</strong> zooplankton i<strong>de</strong>ntification. The laser optical plankton counter<br />

records a shape approximation of particles crossing an array of light<br />

beams and can hardly set one particle apart another among various classes<br />

of particles and organisms (Herman et al., 2004).<br />

More recently, several instruments that employ image analysis to characterise<br />

and enumerate oceanic zooplankton have been <strong>de</strong>veloped and<br />

tested in the field (Benfield et al., 2007), including i) the vi<strong>de</strong>o plankton<br />

recor<strong>de</strong>r (Davis et al., 2005), ii) the shadowed imaged particle profiling<br />

and evaluation recor<strong>de</strong>r (Sipper, Samson et al., 2001), iii) the in situ ichthyoplankton<br />

imaging system (Isiis, Cowen and Guigand, 2008), and iv)<br />

the zooplankton visualisation and imaging system (Zoovis, Benfield et al.,<br />

2007). Most of these instruments <strong>de</strong>tect relatively large organisms (more<br />

than 100µm); however, there is an increasing interest in quantifying nanoand<br />

microplankton particles (Olson and Sosik, 2007; Sosik and Olson,<br />

2007). Several systems using holographic imaging have been <strong>de</strong>veloped<br />

<strong>for</strong> this purpose (Alexan<strong>de</strong>r et al., 2000; Hobson et al., 1997; Katz et al.,<br />

1999; Pfitsch et al., 2007). Whether <strong>de</strong>signed <strong>for</strong> small or large plankton,<br />

all these instruments collect images of a <strong>de</strong>fined volume of water that can<br />

be processed to obtain unique in<strong>for</strong>mation about the distribution, abundance,<br />

and behaviour of plankton on scales that cannot be investigated by<br />

conventional sampling systems such as nets and pumps. Most of the time,<br />

these instruments were used to document the in situ behaviour, taxonomic<br />

diversity, spatial distribution, and relative abundance of planktons. They<br />

were also used in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ntly to study the dynamic of non-living particles<br />

in the water column.<br />

I<strong>de</strong>ally, both plankton and non-living particles should be studied simultaneously<br />

because of their interactions in the pelagic realm. These interac-


Part II – Chapter 2 121<br />

tions inclu<strong>de</strong> <strong>for</strong> example zooplankton feeding on <strong>de</strong>tritus produced at<br />

the surface leading to particle aggregation, fragmentation, and remineralisation<br />

in the water column. These interactions affect the transfer of large<br />

amounts of carbon from the surface to the <strong>de</strong>ep sea – a process known as<br />

the “biological pump” – and contribute significantly to climate variability<br />

(Sarmiento and Le Quere, 1996; Volk and Hoffert, 1985). There<strong>for</strong>e, in<br />

or<strong>de</strong>r to better un<strong>de</strong>rstand the biological pump, it is crucial to evaluate<br />

simultaneously the distribution of the particulate matter and the zooplankton<br />

in the water column. The un<strong>de</strong>rwater vision profilers (UVPs)<br />

were <strong>de</strong>signed and constructed in our laboratory at Villefranche-sur-Mer<br />

in or<strong>de</strong>r to achieve this goal (figure 1). Yet, particle and plankton-imaging<br />

systems present new challenges to the studies of aquatic biota. In this<br />

paper, we <strong>de</strong>scribe the fifth generation of the UVP (UVP5) <strong>de</strong>sign and calibrations.<br />

Moreover, we expose experimental results from different cruises<br />

showing the possibility of studying the biodiversity of zooplankton and<br />

the size spectra of particles.<br />

Figure 1: Pictures of the un<strong>de</strong>rwater vision profiler UVP4 (A) and UVP5 as stand<br />

alone (b) and picture of UVP 5 in a 24 bottles Rosette CTD system (conductivity,<br />

temperature and <strong>de</strong>pth, C). UVP4 is a large stand-alone package of nearly 1 m 3 (300<br />

kg) and incorporates a CTD, fluorometer and nephelometer sensors (Gorsky et al.,<br />

1992; Gorsky et al., 2000). The latest version called UVP5 (Picheral et al., 2010) is a<br />

smaller instrument (30kg) that can equip a standard rosette frame, interfaced with<br />

the CTD, and used down to 6000m <strong>de</strong>ep instead of 1000m <strong>de</strong>ep <strong>for</strong> UVP4.


122 Biodiversity<br />

2. Description of the un<strong>de</strong>rwater vision profiler (UVP)<br />

2.1. Main characteristics<br />

The un<strong>de</strong>rwater vision profilers (UVPs) were <strong>de</strong>signed and constructed at<br />

the laboratory of Villefranche-sur-Mer to quantify simultaneously large<br />

particles (more 100 μm) and zooplankton in a known volume of water<br />

(Picheral et al., 2010). The UVP versions 2 to 4 had been operating since<br />

1991 and they provi<strong>de</strong>d a database of more than 1300 inter-calibrated<br />

profiles of particle size distribution covering the global ocean. However<br />

these instruments required <strong>de</strong>dicated winch time on research ships, their<br />

maximum operating <strong>de</strong>pth was 1000m, and the image acquisition at the<br />

ocean surface was limited because of daytime light saturation. In addition,<br />

their complexity required an onboard trained technician, which limited<br />

spreading their use over the oceanographic community. Nowadays,<br />

the UVP5 overcomes these limitations and can be set up <strong>for</strong> short or<br />

long-term <strong>de</strong>ployments either as an autonomous system or as a complement<br />

to CTD (conductivity, temperature and <strong>de</strong>pth) system. The UVP5<br />

dimensions allow its incorporation into autonomous un<strong>de</strong>rwater vehicles<br />

(AUV), remotely operated vehicles (ROV), or drifting or geostationary<br />

mooring. In the near future, the ongoing miniaturisation of the sensors<br />

Table 1: Un<strong>de</strong>rwater Vision Profiler 5 <strong>de</strong>tails<br />

Housing<br />

Data storage<br />

Camera and image<br />

analysis<br />

Lighting<br />

Piloting board<br />

Connection (camera<br />

housing)<br />

Embed<strong>de</strong>d <strong>Sensors</strong><br />

Power<br />

Camera housing pressure rated 6000 m<br />

2 in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt glass cylin<strong>de</strong>rs <strong>for</strong> the lighting<br />

Camera 8 with internal memory storage<br />

Optional external drive<br />

1.3 Megapixelup to 11fps processed images<br />

9 mm fixed focal lens<br />

Pass band Filter centered on 625 nm<br />

Flash duration down to 100 μs<br />

Persistor CF2 piloting processor<br />

Analog to digital conversion <strong>for</strong> external sensors<br />

Digital to analog output to CTD<br />

Power management<br />

Serial interface 100Mb network<br />

Pressure digital sensor with 0.01% accuracy<br />

Pitch sensor<br />

Internal temperature sensor<br />

Rechargeable lithium-ion 6.3 A/29 V battery pack<br />

Continuous monitored during data acquisition


Part II – Chapter 2 123<br />

will lead to the <strong>de</strong>velopment of autonomous camera systems that could<br />

be mounted on drifters and gli<strong>de</strong>rs working in network allowing real time<br />

“visual” monitoring of the biogeochemistry and the biology of the ocean<br />

(see IV, 1).<br />

The UVP5 instrumental package contains an intelligent camera and a<br />

lighting system encompassed into in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt housings (figure 1). In<br />

addition, pressure and angle sensors are inclu<strong>de</strong>d to the system in or<strong>de</strong>r<br />

to monitor the UVP5 <strong>de</strong>ployments and data acquisition. The hardware is<br />

also composed of an acquisition and piloting board, internet switch, hard<br />

drive, and <strong>de</strong>dicated electronic power boards whose <strong>de</strong>tails and characteristics<br />

are presented in table 1. Images can be recor<strong>de</strong>d in fields of view<br />

ranging from 8 × 6 to 22 × 18cm at a distance of 40cm from the camera in<br />

red light environment in or<strong>de</strong>r to reduce zooplankton phototactic behaviour<br />

and to prevent contamination by the sunlight at the surface.<br />

2.2 Calibration<br />

The manufacturing process of the UVP5 produces light-emitting dio<strong>de</strong>s<br />

(LED) lighting systems and glass housings with unique optical characteristics.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, each instrument requires individual calibration. In or<strong>de</strong>r<br />

to be able to estimate accurate concentrations and sizes of in situ marine<br />

particles, calibrations of the water volume and the size of particle within<br />

an image have to be done prior to the first <strong>de</strong>ployment. A short <strong>de</strong>scription<br />

of the method is presented below but <strong>de</strong>tails can be found in Picheral<br />

et al. (2010).<br />

The calibration of the volume of the image has to be done in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ntly<br />

<strong>for</strong> each of the two lights. A white sheet of paper, immerged in a tank with<br />

seawater, is placed at different distances from the LEDs. Pictures of the<br />

light field projected on the white paper are recor<strong>de</strong>d and gathered in or<strong>de</strong>r<br />

to reconstruct the volume in 3D (Picheral et al., 2010, figure 2C). The<br />

size calibration protocol <strong>de</strong>fines the equation and enables the conversion<br />

from a particle <strong>de</strong>fined by a number of pixels to size (area) in metric unit.<br />

Due to light-scattering in the water, this relationship is not linear <strong>for</strong> small<br />

targets. It follows the rule<br />

Sm=A×Sp B ,<br />

where Sp is the surface of the particle in pixels and Sm is the surface<br />

in squared-millimetres. The calibration and <strong>de</strong>termination of A and B<br />

involves diverse objects sorted into three major qualitative optical groups<br />

(dark, transparent, and heterogeneous) in or<strong>de</strong>r to represent the diversity<br />

of natural particles present in the environment.


124 Biodiversity<br />

2.3. Zooplankton i<strong>de</strong>ntification<br />

Since 2001, the UVP4 and UVP5 have provi<strong>de</strong>d images of macrozooplankton<br />

over the globe. All profiles have been analysed following the<br />

same protocol and using custom software routines to extract large objects<br />

(i.e. 500µm in maximum length). This size threshold was selected because<br />

most of the organisms cannot be i<strong>de</strong>ntified below that size due to current<br />

insufficient resolution of the images. The sorting of the objects is<br />

computer-assisted as <strong>for</strong> the laboratory Zooscan system (Gorsky, 2010)<br />

and the computer prediction is visually validated by specialists to i<strong>de</strong>ntify<br />

taxa. The size of the organisms is reported as well as its area or major and<br />

minor axes of the best fitted ellipse. This measure is best suited <strong>for</strong> dark<br />

and opaque organisms such as chaeognathes, radiolarians, fish, and large<br />

crustaceans, but cannot be used <strong>for</strong> gelatinous organisms.<br />

3. Study of particle dynamics and zooplankton community<br />

structures at different spatial scales<br />

3.1. Marine particles<br />

The UVPs were <strong>de</strong>ployed more than 3000 times covering almost all oceans<br />

on Earth (figure 2). The first versions of the UVPs (2 and 3) were not<br />

able to efficiently distinguish the non-living particles from the zooplanktonic<br />

organisms. There<strong>for</strong>e, earlier studies focused on the size spectra of<br />

all particles, assuming that most of them were nonliving particles. This<br />

hypothesis was then confirmed by the use of UVPs 4 and 5 showing that<br />

zooplanktons account <strong>for</strong> only 0.1 to 10% of the total number of particles<br />

in the water column (see next section).<br />

The most important biogeochemical in<strong>for</strong>mation provi<strong>de</strong>d by the UVPs<br />

consists on the size spectra of large particles (more than 100µm). These<br />

particles, in the <strong>for</strong>m of aggregates of individual particles of different<br />

origins, are the main vector of the vertical flux of carbon to the <strong>de</strong>ep<br />

sea. In or<strong>de</strong>r to correctly estimate this flux, the concentration of particle<br />

per size bin (number per centimetre) must be converted to biovolume<br />

(cm 3 .cm -3 ) and to biomass (mg DryWeight.cm -3 ) assuming relationships<br />

between size and mass (Stemmann et al., 2008a). Then, the known relationship<br />

between size and settling speed can be used to estimate vertical<br />

flux (Guidi et al., 2008; Stemmann et al., 2004b).<br />

The coupling between small and meso-scale (scales from 5km to 100km)<br />

physical and biological processes in highly dynamic environments such as<br />

frontal zones, filaments, and equatorial systems was shown to influence<br />

the spatial patterns of carbon export. Vertical profiles of particle flux can


Part II – Chapter 2 125<br />

be analysed in a spatial context in or<strong>de</strong>r to provi<strong>de</strong> estimates of carbon<br />

sequestration by the oceans at different scales. Previous <strong>de</strong>ployments of<br />

the UVPs at high spatial resolution revealed that particle spatial patterns<br />

can be observed at scales as small as 10 to 100 km (Gorsky et al., 2002a;<br />

Gorsky et al., 2002b; Guidi et al., 2007; Stemmann et al., 2008c). Particle<br />

size spectra were also used in time series to constrain mathematical mo<strong>de</strong>ls<br />

of particle flux to the interior of the ocean (Stemmann et al., 2004a;<br />

2004b). These analyses led to <strong>for</strong>mulate the hypothesis that zooplankton<br />

organisms can <strong>de</strong>tect large settling particles and can fragment them in<br />

numerous smaller parts that have slower settling speed. This process may<br />

generally affect carbon sequestration in the <strong>de</strong>ep ocean.<br />

Figure 2: Global map showing the location of sites that were studied using the<br />

different versions of the UVP (dark blue = UVP2, green = UVP3, light blue =<br />

UVP4, red = UVP5).<br />

3.2. Comparison between zooplankton and non living particle size spectra<br />

The improvements of the optics and illumination of UVP4 and UVP5<br />

enabled simultaneous estimations of the vertical distributions of both<br />

particles and zooplankton size spectra (figure 3).


126 Biodiversity<br />

Figure 3: A. Vertical abundance (relative units) of two size classes of large particulate<br />

matter (LPM lines) and vertical day (upper right) and night (upper left) distributions<br />

of copepods during the Cali<strong>for</strong>nia current ecosystem long-term ecological research<br />

(CCELTER) cruise off the Cali<strong>for</strong>nian coast in autumn 2008. b. Typical UVP5<br />

images of individuals from different macrozooplankton groups including copepoda<br />

(1), radiolarian (2), chaetognate (3), medusae (4), appendicularia (5), and euphausid<br />

(6).


Part II – Chapter 2 127<br />

Acoustic, optical, and imaging systems all face the same challenge when<br />

trying to distinguish between plankton and other particles in the water<br />

column. Plankton larger than 500µm inclu<strong>de</strong>s crustacean (e.g. copepods<br />

and euphausiids), gelatinous taxa (e.g. medusae, tunicates), and eggs and<br />

fish larvae. Other particles of the same size range inclu<strong>de</strong> aggregates,<br />

abandoned houses of larvaceans, mucous webs of pteropods and all associated<br />

material, including living (protozoa and bacteria) and <strong>de</strong>ad materials.<br />

Many of these “other particles” are fragile and are not retained and/<br />

or preserved by filters or nets meshes (Gonzalez-Quiros and Checkley,<br />

2006). There<strong>for</strong>e, the contributions of organisms to the total number or<br />

the biomass of particles is not well known. Misrecognition between organisms<br />

and particles can have <strong>de</strong>ep implication <strong>for</strong> the estimation of available<br />

biomass <strong>for</strong> higher trophic levels and <strong>for</strong> the estimation of vertical<br />

carbon fluxes. The laser optical plankton counter (LOPC) potentially distinguishes<br />

automatically zooplankton from particles based on the opacity<br />

and size of the recor<strong>de</strong>d objects (Checkley et al., 2008; Gonzalez-Quiros<br />

and Checkley, 2006; Jackson and Checkley, 2011). However, results provi<strong>de</strong>d<br />

by this instrument consist in a proxy <strong>for</strong> zooplankton since the<br />

recognition cannot be validated nor the taxa recognised. The UVP’s distinction<br />

is based on the automatic sorting of particles larger than 500µm<br />

followed by manual image analysis and visual verification of the plankton<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntifications by experts (Stemmann et al., 2008b; Stemmann et al.,<br />

2008d).<br />

During the Boum cruise on the Mediterranean Sea (summer 2008), the<br />

UVP was <strong>de</strong>ployed on a longitudinal transect from the East to West basin<br />

<strong>for</strong> short-term stations and 3 sites were selected <strong>for</strong> their oligotrophic cha–<br />

racteristic (figure 4). The comparison between particles and zooplankton<br />

size spectra <strong>for</strong> the same size range (500µm-few mm) shows that the<br />

dominant zooplankton in abundance were radiolaria. More interesting,<br />

the results show almost <strong>for</strong> the first time that living organisms were only<br />

1-15% of total particles <strong>de</strong>tected by the UVP in the more than 500µm<br />

size range. These ratios are slightly lower than those reported earlier <strong>for</strong><br />

the oPC (25%) and LOPC (20+/-14%) in the Cali<strong>for</strong>nian Current system<br />

(Gonzalez-Quiros and Checkley, 2006; Jackson and Checkley, 2011).<br />

More data of such type should be acquired in different oceans to test<br />

whether the strong dominance of non-living particles is a common feature<br />

of pelagic ecosystem.


128 Biodiversity<br />

Figure 4: Particles and zooplankton normalised number spectra obtained by the<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rwater vision profiler at 3 locations in the Eastern (left), Central (middle) and<br />

Western (right) Mediterranean Sea during the BOUM cruise in July 2008 (adapted<br />

from Stemmann and Boss, 2012). Particles were counted automatically from 60µm<br />

in equivalent spherical diameter (ESD) and thus inclu<strong>de</strong> non living particles and<br />

zooplankton organisms. The different taxa were counted manually on the images<br />

only <strong>for</strong> size larger than 500µm from which they can be i<strong>de</strong>ntified.<br />

3.3. Appendicularians and the biological pump<br />

Appendicularians are zooplanktonic pelagic tunicates. They produce a<br />

mucous external filtration <strong>de</strong>vice called “the house” which allow them<br />

to filter small particles (0.2-50µm, see Lombard et al., 2011) from the<br />

seawater. Up to 26 houses can be produced within a day by a single individual<br />

(Sato et al., 2003), and once clogged, are discar<strong>de</strong>d contributions<br />

to marine snow (Alldredge, 2005; Alldredge and Silver, 1988). Thus, the<br />

biogeochemical action of appendiculiarians inclu<strong>de</strong>s mostly “repackaging”<br />

by filtering small particles and producing large ones. This effect<br />

on the biogeochemistry of particles and there<strong>for</strong>e on carbon fluxes was<br />

shown to be potentially important (Berline et al., 2011; Robison et al.,<br />

2005b). However, these organisms have been largely un<strong>de</strong>rstudied until<br />

now mainly because of instrument limitations.<br />

Imaging systems such as the UVP overcome these limitations and provi<strong>de</strong><br />

simultaneous observations of their distribution and relation to particle<br />

stocks and fluxes. Appendicularians repackaging action were estimated<br />

from observations in the northeastern Atlantic ocean by the UVP4.<br />

Combined data of appendicularians and associated fluxes from UVP<br />

observations and from sediment traps suggested that the estimated pro-


Part II – Chapter 2 129<br />

duction of particulate matter by sub-surface appendicularians excee<strong>de</strong>d<br />

the observed total sinking flux at 200m (Lombard et al., 2010). This study<br />

supports the hypothesis that appendicularians play an important role in<br />

the production of particle fluxes (Alldredge, 2005). In addition, laboratory<br />

observation on discar<strong>de</strong>d houses showed that empty appendicularian<br />

houses un<strong>de</strong>rgo a rapid <strong>de</strong>flation and compression process, <strong>de</strong>creasing<br />

their size and increasing their sinking speed (Lombard and Kiørboe,<br />

2010). This process, combined with the previous estimation of discar<strong>de</strong>d<br />

houses production, leads to the conclusion that up to 20-40% of the<br />

300-500µm particles observed by the UVP in the upper 100m of the water<br />

column may be of appendicularian origin.<br />

In addition to producing discar<strong>de</strong>d houses in the epipelagic layers,<br />

appendicularians are also supposed to be efficient at repackaging small<br />

particles by grazing into larger aggregates (more than 1mm) in the <strong>de</strong>ep<br />

ocean (Alldredge, 2005). Using the UVP4 observations, the relationship<br />

between the changes in the vertical distributions of particles and<br />

zooplankton, including appendicularians, was investigated during the<br />

Mareco cruise in the North Atlantic (Stemmann et al., 2008b). The<br />

gelatinous fauna were consistently the most numerous between 400-<br />

900m and in particular the appendicularians, that occurred mostly<br />

below 300m (figure 5). Particles vertical profiles showed that the equivalent<br />

spherical volume of particles (100µm


130 Biodiversity<br />

Figure 5: Vertical distribution of appendicularians (upper panel, bars are mean<br />

abundance and the stems are the standard <strong>de</strong>viation) and particles (lower panel,<br />

100µm


Part II – Chapter 2 131<br />

We tested if the zoogeography of macrozooplankton in the mesopelagic<br />

layer corresponds to these biogeochemical provinces (Stemmann et al.,<br />

2008d). The zooplankton community was sorted in 21 morphotypes and<br />

more than 5000 organisms were i<strong>de</strong>ntified in the 100-1000 m <strong>de</strong>pth layer.<br />

The numerically dominant groups were crustaceans (24%) followed by the<br />

medusae (18%), appendicularians (14%) chaetognathes (11%), fish (7%) and<br />

single-cell sarcodines of the group Star (6%, see figure 6). The other taxonomic<br />

groups were less than 5% of the total count each. However, pooling<br />

all single-cell sarcodines moved this group to second rank (23%) in term<br />

of frequency of occurrence. From a trophic perspective, the assemblages<br />

Figure 6: Frequency of occurrence <strong>for</strong> the 20 taxonomic groups in the 9 regions.<br />

Note that the numerically dominant group of Crustacean has been removed<br />

from the list to increase the <strong>de</strong>tails in the other groups. Appendicularians (App.),<br />

Thaliacae (Thal.), Fish, Haliscera spp. medusa (Hal.), S. bittentaculata (Sol.), Aglantha<br />

spp. (Agl.), Aeginura grimaldii (Grim.), “other medusae” (Med.), chaetognath<br />

(Chaet.), lobate ctenophore (Lob.), cydippid ctenophore (Cyd.), siphonophore<br />

(Sipho.), single-cell sarcodine grouped by four (Radio CS.), colonial radiolarians<br />

(Radio C.), colonial radiolarians with double line (Radio CD.), Phaedorian (Phaeo.),<br />

single-cell sarcodine with spines (Spine.), double-cell sarcodine with spines (Spine<br />

2.), spheres (Sphere.), and sarcodine with hairs (Star.). The regions are <strong>de</strong>fined as:<br />

Northeast Atlantic shelves (NECS), Atlantic Arctic (ARCT), North Atlantic drift<br />

(NADR), Atlantic Subarctic (ARC), Subantarctic, ocean (SANT), North Atlantic<br />

Subtropical ocean, (NAST), South Pacific Subtropical Gyre (SPSG), Western<br />

Australia (AUSW), Mediterranean Sea (MEDI). The or<strong>de</strong>r of the region is set so the<br />

proportion of carnivorous organisms (in grey from Chaet. to Sipho.) <strong>de</strong>creases from<br />

left to right (modified from Stemmann et al., 2008).


132 Biodiversity<br />

of zooplankton could be lumped into three categories: gelatinous carnivores<br />

(cydippid stenophores, lobate ctenophores, medusae, siphonophores,<br />

chaetognathes), filter fee<strong>de</strong>r <strong>de</strong>tritivores (appendicularians and salps) and<br />

omnivores (sarcodines, crustaceans and fish). Interestingly, the proportion<br />

of carnivores <strong>de</strong>creased from 95% to 15%, from the high latitu<strong>de</strong> regions<br />

(Northest Atlantic shelves, Atlantic Arctic, North Atlantic drift, Atlantic<br />

Subarctic, Subantarctic ocean) to the low latitu<strong>de</strong> regions (Mediterranean<br />

sea, western Australia, South Pacific subtropical Gyre). The similarity in<br />

the community assemblages of zooplankton in the layer between 100 and<br />

1000m was significantly higher within regions than between regions, <strong>for</strong><br />

most cases. The regions with comparable compositions were located in the<br />

North Atlantic with adjacent water masses, suggesting that the assemblages<br />

were either mixed by advective transport or that environmental conditions<br />

were similar in mesopelagic layers. The data suggest that the spatial structuring<br />

of mesopelagic macrozooplankton occurs at large scales (e.g. basin<br />

scales) but not necessarily at smaller scales (e.g. oceanic front).<br />

4. Conclusion<br />

Results obtained using the UVP but also several other in situ imaging instruments<br />

have shown that bio-imagery techniques can provi<strong>de</strong> useful data on<br />

plankton and particles spatial and temporal distribution in the upper kilometre<br />

of the ocean. In the next <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>, rapid technological evolution toward<br />

miniaturisation in the optical sensors is expected, and will make possible<br />

the use of these sensors on autonomous plat<strong>for</strong>ms. Their extensive use may<br />

set a revolution in ocean plankton sciences equivalent to the revolution in<br />

medical practices <strong>for</strong> the last 15 years. Broa<strong>de</strong>r spatial and longer temporal<br />

coverage of plankton size spectra will soon be possible <strong>for</strong> global monitoring<br />

programs (see chapter IV, 1). Mathematical mo<strong>de</strong>ls <strong>for</strong> individual<br />

physiological and population change rates, biomasses flow between trophic<br />

levels, and functions of organisms or particle size, were also <strong>de</strong>veloped in<br />

the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>. The new sets of data obtained by the wi<strong>de</strong> use of imaging<br />

instruments are well adapted to calibrate and validate these mo<strong>de</strong>ls.<br />

Authors’ references<br />

Lars Stemmann, Marc Picheral, Franck Prejger, Hervé Claustre, Gabriel<br />

Gorsky:<br />

Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Laboratoire d’Océanographie <strong>de</strong><br />

Villefranche, UPMC-CNRS UMR 7093, Villefranche-sur-Mer, France.


Part II – Chapter 2 133<br />

Lionel Guidi:<br />

University of Hawaii, Department of Oceanography, C-MORE, Center<br />

<strong>for</strong> Microbial Oceanography: Research and Education, Honolulu, USA<br />

Fabien Lombard:<br />

Université <strong>de</strong> la Méditerranée, Laboratoire d’Océanographie Physique et<br />

Biogéochimique, UMR 6535, Campus <strong>de</strong> Luminy, Marseille, France<br />

Corresponding author: Lars Stemmann, stemmann@obs-vlfr.fr<br />

Aknowledgement<br />

The authors would like to thank the many colleagues who helped us to<br />

<strong>de</strong>velop our knowledge on plankton and particles dynamics as <strong>de</strong>tected<br />

using their optical properties. Lars Stemmann was supported by funding<br />

from the 7th European Framework Program (JERICO) and by the PICS<br />

program of the CNRS. Fabien Lombard was supported by the French program<br />

ANR-10-PDOC-005-01 ‘Ecogely’. Lionel Guidi was supported by<br />

Center <strong>for</strong> Microbial Oceanography, Research and Education (C‐MORE;<br />

NSF grant EF-349 0424599), the HOT program (NSF grant OCE09‐26766)<br />

and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (P.I. Pr David M. Karl).<br />

References<br />

Agrawal Y. C., Pottsmith H. C., 2000. Instruments <strong>for</strong> particle size and<br />

settling velocity observations in sediment transport. Marine Geology, 168,<br />

pp. 89-114.<br />

Alexan<strong>de</strong>r S., An<strong>de</strong>rson S., Hendry D. C., Hobson P. R., Lampitt R. S., Lucas-<br />

Leclin B., Nareid H., Nebrensky J. J., Player M. A., Saw K., Tipping K.,<br />

Watson J., Craig G., 2000. HoloCam: a subsea holographic camera <strong>for</strong><br />

recording marine organisms and particles. SPIE Proceedings series: Optical<br />

Diagnostics <strong>for</strong> Industrial Applications, 4076, pp. 111-119.<br />

Alldredge A. L., 2005. The contribution of discar<strong>de</strong>d appendicularian houses<br />

to the flux of particulate organic carbon from oceanic surface waters, in:<br />

Gorsky, G. Youngbluth M. J. (Eds.), Response of Marine Ecosystems to<br />

Global Change: Ecological Impact of Appendicularians. Gordon and<br />

Breach scientific publishers, Paris, pp. 309-326.<br />

Alldredge A. L., Silver M. W., 1988. Characteristics, dynamics and significance<br />

of marine snow. Progress in Oceanography, 20, pp. 41-82.<br />

Benfield M. C., Grosjean P., Culverhouse P. F., Irigoien X., Sieracki M. E., Lopez-<br />

Urrutia A., Dam H. G., Hu Q., Davis C. S., Hansen A., Pilskaln C. H.,


134 Biodiversity<br />

Riseman E. M., Schultz H., Utgoff P. E., Gorsky G., 2007. RAPID: Research<br />

on automated plankton i<strong>de</strong>ntification. Oceanography, 20, pp. 172-187.<br />

Berline L., Stemmann L., Vichi M., Lombard F., Gorsky G., 2011. Impact<br />

of appendicularians on <strong>de</strong>tritus and export fluxes: a mo<strong>de</strong>l approach at<br />

DyFAMed site. Journal of Plankton Research, 33, pp. 855-872.<br />

Checkley D. M., Davis R. E., Herman A. W., Jackson G. A., 2008. Assessing<br />

plankton and other particles in situ with the SOLOPC. Limnology and<br />

Oceanography, 53, pp. 2123-2136.<br />

Cowen R. K., Guigand C. M., 2008. In situ ichthyoplankton imaging<br />

system (Isiis): system <strong>de</strong>sign and preliminary results. Limnology and<br />

Oceanography: Methods, 6, pp. 126-132.<br />

Davis C. S., Thwaites F. T., Gallager S. M., Hu, Q., 2005. A three-axis fast-tow<br />

digital Vi<strong>de</strong>o Plankton Recor<strong>de</strong>r <strong>for</strong> rapid surveys of plankton taxa and<br />

hydrography. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 3, pp. 59-74.<br />

Gonzalez-Quiros R., Checkley D. M., 2006. Occurrence of fragile particles<br />

inferred from optical plankton counters used in situ and to analyze net<br />

samples collected simultaneously. Journal of Geophysical Research –<br />

Oceans, 111, pp. 5-6.<br />

Gorsky G., Aldorf C., Kage M., Picheral M., Garcia y., Favole J., 1992. Vertical<br />

distribution of suspen<strong>de</strong>d aggregates <strong>de</strong>termined by a new un<strong>de</strong>rwater<br />

vi<strong>de</strong>o profiler, in: Nival P., boucher J., bhaud M. (Eds.), 3ème Colloque du<br />

Programme National sur le Déterminisme du Recrutement, Nantes (France),<br />

1-3 oct 1991. Annales <strong>de</strong> l’Institut océanographique, 68, pp. 275-280.<br />

Gorsky G., Ohman M. D., Picheral M., Gasparini S., Stemmann L., Romagnan<br />

J.-B., Cawood A., Pesant S., Garcia-Comas C., Prejger F., 2010. Digital<br />

zooplankton image analysis using the ZooScan integrated system. Journal<br />

of Plankton Research, pp. 285-303.<br />

Gorsky G., Picheral M., Stemmann L., 2000. Use of the un<strong>de</strong>rwater vi<strong>de</strong>o<br />

profiler <strong>for</strong> the study of aggregate dynamics in the North Mediterranean.<br />

Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 50, pp. 121-128.<br />

Gorsky G., Prieur L., Taupier-Letage I., Stemmann L., Picheral M., 2002b. Large<br />

particulate matter in the Western Mediterranean – LPM distribution related<br />

to mesoscale hydrodynamics. Journal of Marine Systems, 33, pp. 289-311.<br />

Guidi L., Jackson G. A., Stemmann L., Miquel J., Picheral M., Gorsky G.,<br />

2008. Relationship between particle size distribution and flux in the<br />

mesopelagic zone. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research<br />

Papers, 55, pp. 1364-1374.<br />

Guid L., Stemmann L., Legendre L., Picheral M., Prieur L., Gorsky G., 2007.<br />

Vertical distribution of aggregates (> 110 µm) and mesoscale activity in<br />

the northeastern Atlantic: effects on the <strong>de</strong>ep vertical export of surface<br />

carbon. Limnology and Oceanography, 52, pp. 7-18.<br />

Herman A. W., Beanlands B., Phillips E. F., 2004. The next generation of<br />

Optical Plankton Counter: the Laser-OPC. Journal of Plankton Research,<br />

26, pp. 1135-1145.


Part II – Chapter 2 135<br />

Hobson P. R., Krantz E. P., Lampitt R. S., Rogerson A., Watson J., 1997. A<br />

preliminary study of the distribution of plankton using hologrammetry.<br />

Optics and Laser Technology, 29, pp. 25-33.<br />

Jackson G. A., Checkley D. M., 2011. Particle size distributions in the upper 100m<br />

water column and their implications <strong>for</strong> animal feeding in the plankton.<br />

Deep-Sea Research Part I: oceanographic Research Papers, 58, pp. 283-297.<br />

Katz J., Donaghay P., Zhang J., King S., Russell K., 1999. Submersible<br />

holocamera <strong>for</strong> <strong>de</strong>tection of particle characteristics and motions in the<br />

ocean. Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 46,<br />

pp. 1455-1481.<br />

Lindsay D. J., Furushima Y., Miyake H., Kitamura M., Hunt J. C., 2004. The<br />

scyphomedusan fauna of the Japan Trench: preliminary results from a<br />

remotely-operated vehicle. Hydrobiologia, 530-531, pp. 537-547.<br />

Lindsay D. J., Hunt J. C., 2005. Biodiversity in midwater cnidarians and<br />

ctenophores: submersible-based results from <strong>de</strong>ep-water bays in the Japan<br />

Sea and north-western Pacific. Journal of the Marine Biological Association<br />

of the United Kingdom, 85, pp. 503-517.<br />

Lombard F., Kiørboe T., 2010. Marine snow originating from appendicularian<br />

houses: Age-<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt settling characteristics. Deep-Sea Research Part I:<br />

Oceanographic Research Papers, 57, pp. 1304-1313.<br />

Lombard F., Legendre L., Picheral M., Sciandra A., Gorsky G., 2010. Prediction<br />

of ecological niches and carbon export by appendicularians using a new<br />

multispecies ecophysiological mo<strong>de</strong>l. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 398,<br />

pp. 109-125.<br />

Lombard F., Selan<strong>de</strong>r E., Kiørboe T., 2011. Active prey rejection in the filterfeeding<br />

appendicularian Oikopleura dioica. Limnology and Oceanography,<br />

56, pp. 1504-1512.<br />

Longhurst A., 1995. Seasonal cycles of pelagic production and consumption.<br />

Progress in Oceanography, 36, pp. 77-167.<br />

Olson R. J., Sosik H. M., 2007. A new submersible imaging-in-flow instrument<br />

to analyze nano-and microplankton: Imaging FlowCytobot. Limnology<br />

and Oceanography: Methods, 5, pp. 195-203.<br />

Pfitsch D. W., Malkiel E., Takagi M., Ronzhes Y., King S., Sheng J., Katz J.,<br />

2007. Analysis of in situ microscopic organism behavior in data acquired<br />

using a free-drifting submersible holographic imaging system. Oceans,<br />

vols 1-5, pp. 583-590.<br />

Picheral M., Guidi L., Stemmann L., Karl D. M., Iddaoud G., Gorsky G., 2010.<br />

The Un<strong>de</strong>rwater Vision Profiler 5: An advanced instrument <strong>for</strong> high spatial<br />

resolution studies of particle size spectra and zooplankton. Limnology<br />

and Oceanography: Methods, 8, pp. 462-473.<br />

Robison B. H., 2004. Deep pelagic biology. Journal of Experimental Marine<br />

Biology and Ecology, 300, pp. 253-272.<br />

Robison B. H., Raskoff K. A., Sherlock R. E., 2005a. Ecological substrate in<br />

midwater: Doliolula equus, a new mesopelagic tunicate. Journal of the<br />

Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 85, pp. 655-663.


136 Biodiversity<br />

Robison B. H., Reisenbichler K. R., Sherlock R. E., 2005b. Giant larvacean<br />

houses: Rapid carbon transport to the <strong>de</strong>ep sea floor. Science, 308,<br />

pp. 1609-1611.<br />

Samson S., Hopkins T., Remsen A., Langebrake L., Sutton T., Patten J., 2001. A<br />

system <strong>for</strong> high-resolution zooplankton imaging. IEEE Journal of Oceanic<br />

Engineering, 26, pp. 671-676.<br />

Sarmiento J. L., Le Quere C., 1996. Oceanic carbon dioxi<strong>de</strong> uptake in a mo<strong>de</strong>l<br />

of century-scale global warming. Science, 274, pp. 1346-1350.<br />

Sato R., Tanaka Y., Ishimaru T., 2003. Species-specific house productivity of<br />

appendicularians. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 259, pp. 163-172.<br />

Sosik H. M., Olson R. J., 2007. Automated taxonomic classification of<br />

phytoplankton sampled with imaging-in-flow cytometry. Limnology and<br />

Oceanography: Methods, 5, pp. 204-216.<br />

Steinberg D. K., Silver M. W., Pilskaln C. H., 1997. Role of mesopelagic<br />

zooplankton in the community metabolism of giant larvacean house<br />

<strong>de</strong>tritus in Monterey Bay, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, USA. Marine Ecology Progress<br />

Series, 147, pp. 167-179.<br />

Stemmann L., Boss E., 2012. Plankton and particle size and packaging: From<br />

<strong>de</strong>termining optical properties to driving the biological pump. Annual<br />

Review of Marine Science, 4, in press.<br />

Stemmann L., Eloire D., Sciandra A., Jackson G.A., Guidi L., Picheral M.,<br />

Gorsky G., 2008a. Volume distribution <strong>for</strong> particles between 3.5 to 2000µm<br />

in the upper 200m region of the South Pacific Gyre. Biogeosciences, 5,<br />

pp. 299-310.<br />

Stemmann L., Hosia A., Youngbluth M.J., Soiland H., Picheral M., Gorsky G.,<br />

2008b. Vertical distribution (0-1000 m) of macrozooplankton, estimated<br />

using the Un<strong>de</strong>rwater Vi<strong>de</strong>o Profiler, in different hydrographic regimes<br />

along the northern portion of the Mid-Atlantic ridge. Deep Sea Research<br />

Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 55, pp. 94-105.<br />

Stemmann L., Jackson G. A., Gorsky G., 2004a. A vertical mo<strong>de</strong>l of particle size<br />

distributions and fluxes in the midwater column that inclu<strong>de</strong>s biological<br />

and physical processes – Part II: application to a three year survey in<br />

the NW Mediterranean Sea. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic<br />

Research Papers, 51, pp. 885-908.<br />

Stemmann L., Jackson G. A., Ianson D., 2004b. A vertical mo<strong>de</strong>l of particle size<br />

distributions and fluxes in the midwater column that inclu<strong>de</strong>s biological<br />

and physical processes – Part I: mo<strong>de</strong>l <strong>for</strong>mulation. Deep-Sea Research<br />

Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 51, pp. 865-884.<br />

Stemmann L., Prieur L., Legendre L., Taupier-Letage I., Picheral M., Guidi<br />

L., Gorsky G., 2008c. Effects of frontal processes on marine aggregate<br />

dynamics and fluxes: An interannual study in a permanent geostrophic<br />

front (NW Mediterranean). Journal of Marine Systems, 70, pp. 1-20.<br />

Stemmann L., Robert K., Hosia A., Picheral M., Paterson H., Youngbluth M. J.,<br />

Ibanez F., Guidi L., Gorsky G., Lombard F., 2008d. Global zoogeography


Part II – Chapter 2 137<br />

of fragile macrozooplankton in the upper 100-1000 m inferred from the<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rwater vi<strong>de</strong>o profiler. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 65, pp. 433-442.<br />

Volk T., Hoffert M. I., 1985. Ocean carbon pumps: analysis of relative strengths<br />

and efficiencies in ocean-driven atmospheric CO2 changes, in: Sundquist<br />

E. T., Broecker W. S. (Eds.), The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric CO2:<br />

Natural Variations Archean to Present. Geophysical monography series,<br />

32, pp. 99-110.


Chapter 3<br />

Assessment of three genetic methods<br />

<strong>for</strong> a faster and reliable monitoring<br />

of harmful algal blooms<br />

Jahir Orozco-Holguin, Kerstin Töbe, Linda K. Medlin<br />

1. General introduction<br />

Harmful marine algal taxa are globally distributed from tropical to polar<br />

latitu<strong>de</strong>s, and occupy ecological niches ranging from brackish water, such<br />

as the Baltic Sea, to oceanic environments. It is generally acknowledged<br />

that the occurrence of harmful algal blooms is increasing and that pollution<br />

in coastal waters has contributed to this increase. Harmful algae can<br />

produce secondary compounds that are toxic to fish and shellfish (e.g.<br />

oysters, mussels) who feed on toxic algae. These compounds can cause<br />

amnesic, paralytic or diarrhetic traumas when fish and shellfish are eaten<br />

by humans (Hallegraeff, 1993).<br />

To mitigate health problems <strong>for</strong> human populations and negative effects<br />

to fisheries, aquaculture and tourism, accurate and cost-effective systems<br />

<strong>for</strong> i<strong>de</strong>ntification and <strong>de</strong>tection of toxic algae are urgently required. The<br />

monitoring of harmful algal blooms (HABs) is an European Union<br />

requirement and usually relies on visual confirmation of water discoloration,<br />

fish kills, and laborious cell counts. These techniques are very<br />

time-consuming, require specialised or trained personnel, expensive<br />

equipment, and are ineffective when many samples have to be routinely<br />

analysed. Currently, up to five working days may be nee<strong>de</strong>d between<br />

specimen collection and the <strong>de</strong>livery of a diagnostic report of the species<br />

present, leaving little time <strong>for</strong> mitigation responses, which usually involve<br />

moving the caged pinfish or the mussel rafts to a new location. Other


140 Biodiversity<br />

mitigation ef<strong>for</strong>ts, such as precipitation of the bloom with clay particles,<br />

are not practised in Europe.<br />

Molecular methods are potentially faster and more accurate than traditional<br />

light microscopy methods, and have been used <strong>for</strong> i<strong>de</strong>ntification of<br />

phytoplankton (Ayers et al., 2005; Diercks et al., 2008a; 2009; Gescher et<br />

al., 2008; Greenfield et al., 2006; O’Halloran et al., 2006). Recently, the<br />

analysis of small-subunit (SSU) ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes has been<br />

established as an efficient way to characterise complex microbial samples<br />

(Amann et al., 1990). The method has proven to be of special value <strong>for</strong> the<br />

analysis of picophytoplankton samples, which are difficult to monitor by<br />

conventional methods because of their small size (Moon-van <strong>de</strong>r Staay et<br />

al., 2001). This method also circumvents the selective step of laboratory<br />

cultivation (Giovannoni et al., 1990). Direct cloning and sequencing of<br />

the small subunit (SSU) ribosomal DNA (rDNA) from natural samples<br />

provi<strong>de</strong> a broa<strong>de</strong>r view of the structure and composition of communities<br />

(López-Garcia et al., 2001). Because the rRNA database is increasing<br />

continually, it is possible to <strong>de</strong>sign probes from higher taxonomic groups<br />

down to the species level (Guillou et al., 1999; Groben et al., 2004). The<br />

species-specific probes can be applied <strong>for</strong> the analysis of phytoplankton<br />

communities with <strong>de</strong>tection by flow cytometry, epifluorescence microscopy<br />

(Miller and Scholin, 1998; Lim et al., 1999), or other methods that<br />

take advantage of the hybridisation principle (Metfies and Medlin, 2004).<br />

These well-established approaches have the major disadvantage that they<br />

can only be used to i<strong>de</strong>ntify one or a few organisms at a time, which<br />

makes it very time-consuming to get a broad view of a microbial sample.<br />

Thus, other methods have been <strong>de</strong>veloped in which multiple species can<br />

be i<strong>de</strong>ntified at the same time (Metfies and Medlin, 2004).<br />

The i<strong>de</strong>ntification of a region of the rRNA molecule that is species or<br />

group specific is essentially a genetic barco<strong>de</strong>. However most people working<br />

in the barco<strong>de</strong> field do not take into consi<strong>de</strong>ration how they could<br />

possible apply their barco<strong>de</strong> in a real life situation. For monitoring purposes,<br />

rRNA barco<strong>de</strong>s are put to use, either as a probe <strong>for</strong> hybridisation<br />

to a target or as a primer to amplify the target in a PCR reaction (see<br />

below). In <strong>de</strong>signing a barco<strong>de</strong>, the position of the mismatch must be<br />

taken into account if using the barco<strong>de</strong> as a probe (mismatch in the middle)<br />

or as a primer (mismatch at the 3’ end) is chosen. The use of rRNA<br />

probes in fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) reactions has often<br />

been used <strong>for</strong> i<strong>de</strong>ntification of harmful microalgal species in field samples<br />

(e.g., Groben and Medlin, 2005), although it is not regularly inclu<strong>de</strong>d in<br />

monitoring programmes. FISH enables the direct visualisation of target<br />

cells by epi-fluorescence microscopy or by automated cytometric techniques.<br />

The whole cell stays intact and co-occurring phytoplankton species<br />

can be discriminated when counterstained with an overall DNA stain.


Part II – Chapter 3 141<br />

However, weak probe penetration, loss of cells during preparatory steps<br />

and autofluorescence of the target cells can mask the fluorescence signal.<br />

Thus, an unambiguous species differentiation may be difficult to achieve.<br />

Moreover, an extensive analysis of environmental samples with FISH is<br />

very time consuming, thus being ina<strong>de</strong>quate to achieve the high sample<br />

throughput nee<strong>de</strong>d in routine monitoring programs (Touzet et al., 2009).<br />

The limited number of fluorochromes available also restricts the use of<br />

multiple probes at one time. Several cell free <strong>for</strong>mats (DNA only) are currently<br />

available and have overcome the problems associated with FISH<br />

and the whole cell <strong>for</strong>mat. These inclu<strong>de</strong> real-time quantitative polymerase<br />

chain reaction (qPCR), biosensors and microarrays. In the following<br />

sections, we will address issues related to the assessment of these laboratory<br />

methods <strong>for</strong> the monitoring of toxic algae and their possible use in<br />

automated <strong>de</strong>vices and in situ monitoring programs of HAB. The monitoring<br />

of aquatic pathogens is essential to guarantee the safety and health<br />

of aquatic resources and the application of cell free methods to routine<br />

monitoring programs offers the best solution to assess good environmental<br />

status of all waters in a rapidly changing environment.<br />

2. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based method<br />

2.1. General principles<br />

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is one of the most powerful technologies<br />

in molecular biology. With PCR specific sequences, the number<br />

of DNA target molecules is amplified exponentially with each amplification<br />

cycle. The direct sequence amplification in PCR approaches<br />

enables the <strong>de</strong>tection of low abundance targets and the <strong>de</strong>tection of<br />

“hid<strong>de</strong>n” DNA like target species consumed by a predator. However, an<br />

adverse aspect of PCR is the impossibility to visualise the target species<br />

to ensure unequivocally their presence in the sample and to assess any<br />

cross-reaction to any non-target organism (Ku<strong>de</strong>la et al., 2010). With<br />

traditional qualitative “endpoint” PCR, no in<strong>for</strong>mation about the quantity<br />

of starting material in the sample is available. Whereas in qPCR<br />

approaches, data are collected over the entire PCR cycle by using fluorescent<br />

markers that are incorporated into the PCR product during<br />

amplification. The quantity of the amplified product is proportional to<br />

the fluorescence generated during each cycle, which is monitored with<br />

an integrated <strong>de</strong>tection system during the linear exponential phase of<br />

the PCR (Saun<strong>de</strong>rs, 2004). The accumulation of the PCR amplicon is<br />

measured as a change in fluorescence and is directly proportional to the<br />

amount of starting material (see figure 1).


142 Biodiversity<br />

Figure 1: Amplification plot of 28S rDNA from Alexandrium tamarense in two<br />

different environmental samples from the Scottish East Coast (TaqMan approach).<br />

The excited fluorescence is plotted against the cycle number. The <strong>de</strong>lta Rn is<br />

the magnitu<strong>de</strong> of the signal generated by the given PCR conditions relative to a<br />

standard.<br />

The qPCR can single out base pair differences: thus closely related species<br />

or populations can be distinguished. For environmental samples, an<br />

external standard <strong>for</strong> quantifying the amplified DNA is used. This could<br />

be a dilution of plasmids or DNA <strong>de</strong>rived from laboratory cultures with<br />

a known concentration of the target template. To infer concentrations of<br />

the target species in an unknown sample, a standard curve must be ma<strong>de</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong> each target species because of differences in DNA content per cell<br />

(Handy et al., 2008). When using a plasmid standard <strong>for</strong> quantifying cell<br />

numbers, it is essential to know the copy number of the ribosomal gene<br />

of the target species. In addition, one should take into account that the<br />

copy number of the rDNA genes may vary among different strains of an<br />

organism and species (Erdner et al., 2010).<br />

The most common used qPCR method is the SybR Green approach. In<br />

this assay, the fluorescent dye SYBR Green binds to the minor groove of<br />

double stran<strong>de</strong>d DNA (dsDNA), which results in an increase of the fluorescent<br />

emission proportional to an increase in the dsDNA PCR amplicon<br />

<strong>for</strong>mation after each cycle. Proper primer <strong>de</strong>sign is critical to avoid<br />

primer-dimers, which would be counted as amplified DNA because of the<br />

unspecific binding of SybR Green to all dsDNAs. There<strong>for</strong>e, a melting<br />

curve analysis is per<strong>for</strong>med that i<strong>de</strong>ntifies primer-dimers by their lower


Part II – Chapter 3 143<br />

melting temperature compared to that of the target amplicon (Nolan,<br />

2004). In other more sensitive and specific qPCR approaches, specific<br />

or non-specific primers together with a specific fluorigenic oligonucleoti<strong>de</strong><br />

probe are applied (e.g., TaqMan approach, molecular beacon and<br />

hybridisation probe assay). These assays apply fluorescence resonance<br />

energy transfer (FRET), which is the transfer of energy from an excited<br />

fluorophore, the donor, to another fluorophore, the acceptor, to generate<br />

enhanced fluorescence upon binding of the specific probe to its target<br />

(Cardullo et al., 1988).<br />

The use of specific primers and oligonucleoti<strong>de</strong> probes, labelled with<br />

unique fluorescent dyes with different excitation wavelength, enables<br />

a rapid and quantitative enumeration of several organisms within one<br />

sample (multiplex PCR). The number of <strong>de</strong>tectable target genes in one<br />

sample is limited by the number of available fluorescence reporter dyes<br />

<strong>for</strong> the separate probes. Consequently the <strong>de</strong>tection is limited to six species<br />

in one sample. However, multiplex qPCR experiments have to be<br />

carefully optimised, and often require an elaborate adaptation, notably<br />

with increasing target species in one assay (Ku<strong>de</strong>la et al., 2010). Potential<br />

drawbacks and limitations of qPCR could be, <strong>for</strong> instance, different DNA<br />

extraction yields <strong>de</strong>pending on the extraction method used and the presence<br />

of humic substances that could influence the PCR reaction. These<br />

problems could be resolved or at least minimised by applying a highquality<br />

DNA isolation method.<br />

Quantitative PCR can be easily per<strong>for</strong>med immediately after in situ sampling<br />

onboard ship or on shore, but preserved samples can also be used.<br />

However, the preservation method can influence the results or even<br />

inhibit the reaction. The sensitivity of qPCR is consi<strong>de</strong>rably lower with<br />

<strong>for</strong>malin and glutaral<strong>de</strong>hy<strong>de</strong> preservation than with no preservation.<br />

Preservation using ethanol and freezing is preferred because it is still possible<br />

to <strong>de</strong>tect and quantify target cells from fixed field samples after three<br />

years (Hosoi-Tanabe and Sako, 2005). Another commonly used fixative<br />

<strong>for</strong> phytoplankton samples is Lugol’s iodine, which has been reported<br />

to lower the sensitivity of some qPCR experiments (Bowers et al., 2000)<br />

but has also been successfully applied in others (Kavanagh et al., 2010).<br />

In HAB studies, multiplex qPCR experiments are applied less frequently,<br />

because of the extensive required optimisations to apply different primers<br />

and/or probes together in one environmental sample. Handy et al. (2006)<br />

successfully tested multiprobing using a single primer set with species specific<br />

probes in one assay versus multiplexing using specific primers and<br />

specific probes. They found that multiplexing was more efficient, albeit<br />

both methods were successful in <strong>de</strong>tecting multiple raphidophyte species.<br />

More recently a new technology <strong>for</strong> qPCR has emerged. It is termed droplet<br />

qPCR and involves the Illumina® or 454 sequencing method. Tewhey


144 Biodiversity<br />

et al. (2009) were able to per<strong>for</strong>m 1.5 million PCR with primers targeting<br />

435 exons of 47 genes to screen genetic variation in large human populations.<br />

In this method, the genomic DNA template mixture contains all<br />

of PCR components except <strong>for</strong> the primers. The template is prepared by<br />

fragmenting genomic DNA using DNaseI to produce 2-4kb fragments.<br />

The template mixture is ma<strong>de</strong> into droplets and paired with primer pair<br />

droplets and both droplets enter the microfluidic chip at a rate of about<br />

3,000 droplets per second. As the primer pair droplets are smaller than<br />

the template droplets, they move faster through the channels until they<br />

contact the preceding template droplet. Field-induced coalescence of these<br />

droplet pairs results in the two droplets merging to produce a single PCR<br />

droplet, which is collected and processed as an emulsion PCR reaction<br />

(Tewhey et al., 2009).<br />

2.2. Case studies of harmful algae<br />

Quantitative PCR has been used as a sensitive and accurate alternative to<br />

microscopic cell counts <strong>for</strong> estimating changes in cell <strong>de</strong>nsities of harmful<br />

algal species in natural phytoplankton samples. In particular, qPCR<br />

enables the differentiation between morphologically similar species, such<br />

as the dinoflagellate Cryptoperidiniopsis brodyi (Steidinger et al., 2006),<br />

which co-occurs with Pfiesteria species and is indistinguishable by light<br />

microscopy, but is easily i<strong>de</strong>ntified by using qPCR (Park et al., 2007).<br />

Another benefit over microscopic counts is the sensitive enumeration<br />

and i<strong>de</strong>ntification of fragile species, which might not be easily preserved,<br />

such as raphidophytes (Handy et al., 2008) or species that can only be<br />

reliably i<strong>de</strong>ntified with electron microscopy, such as Prymnesium cells.<br />

Multiplexing has also been successfully applied to <strong>de</strong>tect the harmful species<br />

Prymnesium parvum (Manning and La Claire, 2010).<br />

Moreover, qPCR can be much faster and more reliable than traditional<br />

counting methods and cryptic species can be more easily i<strong>de</strong>ntified<br />

(Manning and La Claire, 2010). There<strong>for</strong>e, qPCR has become a standard<br />

method in <strong>de</strong>tecting harmful algae (Fitzpatrick et al., 2010). The target<br />

genes <strong>for</strong> the primers and probes in HAb qPCR applications are the<br />

internal transcribed spacer I-5.8S rRNA gene, or the 18S/28S rRNA gene,<br />

<strong>de</strong>pending on the DNA sequence divergence between closely related species.<br />

A variety of primers targeting these ribosomal genes are hitherto available<br />

<strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>tection and i<strong>de</strong>ntification of various HAb species in qPCR<br />

applications (table 1).


Part II – Chapter 3 145<br />

Table 1: Summary of qPCR studies <strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>tection of HAB species<br />

and the toxins they produce.<br />

Taxon<br />

Toxins<br />

QPCR<br />

Approach<br />

On Midtal<br />

Phylochip<br />

Genus Alexandrium SYBR Green Yes<br />

Toxic North<br />

American cla<strong>de</strong> of<br />

the A. catenella/<br />

fundyense /tamarense<br />

species complex<br />

Pfiesteria shumwayae<br />

Saxitoxin SYBR Green Yes<br />

Unknown<br />

fish killer<br />

SYBR Green<br />

No<br />

Prymnesium parvum prymensins SYBR Green Yes<br />

Genus Pseudonitzschia<br />

Cysts of toxic North<br />

American cla<strong>de</strong> of<br />

the A. catenella/<br />

fundyense /tamarense<br />

species complex<br />

Pfiesteria species<br />

Toxic North<br />

American and<br />

Temperate Asian<br />

cla<strong>de</strong> of the A.<br />

catenella/fundyense<br />

/tamarense species<br />

complex<br />

A. minutum,<br />

A. ostenfeldii,<br />

A. tamutum,<br />

Mediterranean,<br />

North American and<br />

Western European<br />

ribotypes of the A.<br />

catenella/ fundyense<br />

/tamarense species<br />

complex from<br />

European waters<br />

Cysts of the<br />

Temperate Asian<br />

ribotype of A.<br />

catenella/ fundyense/<br />

tamarense species<br />

complex<br />

Domoic<br />

acid<br />

SYBR Green<br />

Yes<br />

Saxitoxins SYBR Green Yes<br />

Unknown<br />

fish killer<br />

Saxitoxin<br />

Saxitoxins<br />

and<br />

sprilloids<br />

Saxitoxins<br />

Taqman<br />

probes<br />

Taqman<br />

probes<br />

Taqman<br />

probes<br />

Taqman<br />

probes<br />

No<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Study<br />

Galluzzi et al.<br />

2004<br />

Dyhrman et<br />

al. 2006 and<br />

2010<br />

Zhang and<br />

Lin 2005<br />

Zamor et al.<br />

2011, Galluzzi<br />

et al. 2008<br />

Fitzpatrick et<br />

al. 2010<br />

Erdner et al.<br />

2010<br />

Bowers et al.<br />

2000<br />

Hosoi-Tanabe<br />

and Sako<br />

2005<br />

Töbe et al.<br />

unpublished<br />

Kamikawa et<br />

al. 2007<br />

Table 1 – to be continued


146 Biodiversity<br />

Table 1 – continued<br />

Taxon<br />

Harmful<br />

raphidophytes<br />

Dinophysis species<br />

Toxins<br />

Unknown<br />

Fish killer<br />

Okadaic<br />

acid<br />

A. minutum Saxitoxins<br />

Lingulodinium<br />

polyedrum<br />

Not toxic<br />

QPCR<br />

Approach<br />

Taqman<br />

probes<br />

Hybridization<br />

probes<br />

Hybridization<br />

probes<br />

Hybridization<br />

probes<br />

On Midtal<br />

Phylochip<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

Study<br />

Bowers et<br />

al. 2006,<br />

Coyne et al.<br />

2005, Handy<br />

et al. 2006,<br />

Kamikawa et<br />

al. 2006<br />

Kavanagh et<br />

al. 2010<br />

Touzet et al.<br />

2009<br />

Moorthi et al.<br />

2006<br />

2.3. Future prospects<br />

Multiplex qPCR assays should be improved <strong>for</strong> routine testing in HAB<br />

studies, with several probes recognising different HAB species in one<br />

single environmental sample, in or<strong>de</strong>r to accelerate the i<strong>de</strong>ntification of<br />

several species and lower substantially analysis costs and time per sample.<br />

Further <strong>de</strong>velopment of primer and probes <strong>for</strong> HAB species and the<br />

application of the variety of available probes will alleviate the <strong>de</strong>ployment<br />

of the method, circumventing long primer and probe testing procedures.<br />

Costs of real-time PCR instruments are <strong>de</strong>creasing, so that in future qPCR<br />

instruments will be standard tools in HAB studies. New high throughput<br />

technologies, such as the open array technology using the qPCR method,<br />

are available. Here, the benefits from microarrays and the data quality of<br />

PCR are combined. The open array is a new nanoliter fluidics plat<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong><br />

low volume solution phase reactions, which enables the analysis of thousands<br />

of samples in parallel. The application of such a high throughput<br />

method will also consi<strong>de</strong>rably alleviate the analysis of large amounts of<br />

environmental samples in HAB studies in future. In addition, qPCR has<br />

now been adapted <strong>for</strong> use in a buoy (Preston et al., 2011) and it is only a<br />

matter of time until qPCR primers <strong>for</strong> toxic algae are ad<strong>de</strong>d because the<br />

environmental sample processor buoy is already capable of <strong>de</strong>tecting toxic<br />

algae using a sandwich hybridisation method with chemiluminescence<br />

<strong>de</strong>tection (see section 3.3 below).


Part II – Chapter 3 147<br />

3. Electrochemical biosensor-based methods<br />

3.1. General principles<br />

DNA (RNA)-based biosensors have been used in numerous fields ranging<br />

from medical diagnosis to <strong>for</strong>ensic and environmental research<br />

(Hei<strong>de</strong>nreich et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2010). An electrochemical biosensor<br />

is a self-contained integrated <strong>de</strong>vice capable of providing specific (semi)-<br />

quantitative analytical in<strong>for</strong>mation using a biological recognition element<br />

(biochemical receptor), which is retained in direct spatial contact with an<br />

electrochemical transduction element (Thévenot et al., 1999). This transducer<br />

trans<strong>for</strong>ms the recognition event into a measurable signal by means<br />

of a potentiostat (see complete set-up in figure 2). Whereas a chemiluminescent<br />

biosensor requires a spectrophometer or a camera to record a<br />

change of colour, electrochemical genosensors use molecular probes to<br />

<strong>de</strong>tect target nucleic acids in a sample by recording changes in an electrochemical<br />

signal. DNA (RNA) strands are used as the recognition element<br />

that can discriminate any target within a mixed assemblage by specific<br />

hybridisation of the capture and signal probes to the complementary target<br />

strand. The method provi<strong>de</strong>s a high selectivity, sensitivity and accuracy,<br />

typically from the millimolar to the femtomolar range with more or<br />

less 5% accuracy.<br />

Figure 2: Principles of a lab-benched electrochemical genosensor. A. Experimental<br />

set-up including the electrochemical sensor interface, the chip connector and<br />

the chip. B. Design of the three electro<strong>de</strong> cell printed on a ceramic substrate<br />

(© Dropsens, http://www.dropsens.com/).


148 Biodiversity<br />

Biosensors are also powerful tools <strong>for</strong> species <strong>de</strong>tection. Although some<br />

chemiluminescent biosensors have been <strong>de</strong>veloped (Scholin et al., 1996),<br />

those based on the direct electrochemical <strong>de</strong>tection of nucleic acid target<br />

molecules have successfully been applied by linking DNA or RNA<br />

hybridisation events onto an oligonucleoti<strong>de</strong>-modified electro<strong>de</strong> surface<br />

(Drummond et al., 2003). The simplicity, low power requirements, speed<br />

and accuracy of electrochemical biosensors have ma<strong>de</strong> them attractive<br />

candidates to overcome traditional limitations in HAB studies (Diercks<br />

et al., 2008b; 2011; Metfies et al., 2005). Moreover, the ability of electrochemical<br />

or chemiluminescent sensors to i<strong>de</strong>ntify directly nucleic acids<br />

in complex samples is a valuable advantage over other approaches, such<br />

as qPCR that requires target purification and amplification (Liao et al.,<br />

2007).<br />

The study of toxic algal blooms with genosensors is greatly facilitated by<br />

the use of DNA (rRNA) probes. The <strong>de</strong>tection strategy is usually based<br />

on a sandwich hybridisation assay (SHA) in which a target DNA or<br />

RNA is bound by both a capture and a signal probe (Rautio et al., 2003;<br />

Zammatteo et al., 1995). Only one of the two probes needs to be specific<br />

<strong>for</strong> the target species. A capture probe is immobilised on a semiconducting<br />

transducer plat<strong>for</strong>m, e.g. carbon or gold. If the target sequence binds<br />

to the capture probe in the first hybridisation event, its <strong>de</strong>tection takes<br />

place via a second hybridisation event with a signal probe linked to a<br />

recor<strong>de</strong>r molecule, such as fluorochromes or digoxigenin. An antibody<br />

linked to the recor<strong>de</strong>r molecule is coupled to a horseradish-peroxidase<br />

(HRP) enzyme <strong>for</strong> electrochemical signal amplification. HRP converts<br />

electrochemically inactive substrates to an electroactive product that<br />

can be <strong>de</strong>tected amperometrically, where the measured current is proportional<br />

to the analyte concentration in a sample (Metfies et al., 2005).<br />

Figure 3 shows the typical amperometric signal expected <strong>for</strong> a DNAbased<br />

biosensor using gold as transducer plat<strong>for</strong>m (signal c) as compared<br />

to the negative control and background (signals b and a, respectively).<br />

For monitoring of water samples, a calibration curve has to be <strong>de</strong>termined<br />

<strong>for</strong> each probe set to assess the current <strong>de</strong>nsity (nA.mm -2 ) <strong>for</strong> 1 ng<br />

RNA. For each target species, the RNA concentration per cell has to<br />

be investigated. Subsequently the cell concentration of the target<br />

species in a water sample can be calculated from the electrochemical<br />

signals. By using a different substrate the anti-digoxigenin antibody<br />

conjugated to HRP reacts to produce a green coloured product,<br />

the intensity of the reaction can be measured in a spectrophotometer<br />

or captured by a camera, thus <strong>for</strong>ming a chemiluminescent<br />

bio sensor.


Part II – Chapter 3 149<br />

Figure 3: Analytical signal recor<strong>de</strong>d by a DNA-based biosensor at a fix potential of<br />

-0.15 V. The signal inclu<strong>de</strong>s (a) background noise, (b) negative control current, and<br />

(c) positive control current with a DNA-based biosensor using gold as transducer<br />

surface. The signal of the positive control relative to the negative control is<br />

proportional to DNA concentration in the sample.<br />

Detection assays of oligonucleoti<strong>de</strong> probes involving the amplification of<br />

hybridisation signals through enzyme tracer molecules have the advantage<br />

of being ultrasensitive (Ronkainen-Matsuno et al., 2002). The assay <strong>for</strong>mat<br />

maximizes discrimination of the target sequences, and RNA purification<br />

is not required. Reactions are rapid, easy to execute and amenable to automation.<br />

Quantification of the target species can be per<strong>for</strong>med by using<br />

smaller, portable and inexpensive instrumentation and several probe sets<br />

have already been <strong>de</strong>veloped <strong>for</strong> this purpose. Such probes can simultaneously<br />

be measured by using the multichip connector shown in Figure 2.<br />

However, few reliable genosensors have been applied so far because one of<br />

their main drawbacks is their lack of robustness. Conditions, such as pH,<br />

temperature and ionic strength, and short-term stability, must be consi<strong>de</strong>red.<br />

3.2 Case studies of harmful algae<br />

The sandwich hybridisation assay with chemiluminescent <strong>de</strong>tection<br />

was first introduced by Scholin et al. (1996) <strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>tection of Pseudonitzschia<br />

species in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia waters. A benchtop <strong>de</strong>vice is available and<br />

other prototypes operated from a buoy are currently being tested. Probes<br />

were initially <strong>de</strong>signed with sequence data from local populations, which<br />

proved to be non-specific when applied to other areas. This difficulty<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rlies the need to use a sequence database based on global isolates


150 Biodiversity<br />

when probes are <strong>de</strong>signed to make them universal. Currently, DNA<br />

probes <strong>for</strong> Pseudo-nitzschia spp., Alexandrium spp., Heterosigma akashiwo,<br />

Chattonella spp., Fibrocapsa japonica, a variety of Karenia spp., Karlodinium<br />

veneficum and Gymnodinium aureolum are available using the chemiluminescent<br />

<strong>de</strong>tection system in a semiautomatic robotic system (Scholin et<br />

al., 2003). Other species <strong>for</strong> whom sandwich hybridisation probes have<br />

been <strong>de</strong>veloped (e.g. Coccholodinium polykrikoi<strong>de</strong>s, Mikulski et al., 2008),<br />

have yet to be applied in a semiautomatic system. In New Zealand, this<br />

method has gained national accreditation and is used to monitor shellfish<br />

harvests (Ayers et al., 2005). A chemiliuminescent SHA <strong>de</strong>tection in a<br />

microliter plate <strong>for</strong>mat was also adapted as a rapid means to test probe<br />

specificity and some probe sets <strong>for</strong> 10 toxic algae were validated (Diercks<br />

et al., 2008c).<br />

Fibre optic genosensors have been applied to harmful algal cell enumeration<br />

of Alexandrium fundyense, Pseudo-nitzschia australis and Alexandrium<br />

ostenfeldii (An<strong>de</strong>rson et al., 2006). Biosensors <strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>tection and i<strong>de</strong>ntification<br />

of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium ostenfeldii and A. minutum<br />

were <strong>de</strong>veloped by Metfies et al. (2005). Development and adaptation of<br />

a multiprobe biosensor <strong>for</strong> the simultaneous <strong>de</strong>tection of 16 target species<br />

of toxic algae has been conducted but is not commercially available<br />

(Diercks et al., 2008a; Diercks et al., 2011). More recently, elucidation<br />

of the different steps of the biosensor fabrication process from the electrochemical<br />

point of view, proof of concept with different algal species,<br />

and evaluation of the influence of the transducer plat<strong>for</strong>m geometry and<br />

material has been published (Orozco et al., 2011a). Probe orientation and<br />

effect of the digoxigenin-enzymatic label in a sandwich hybridization <strong>for</strong>mat<br />

to <strong>de</strong>velop toxic algae biosensors have also been evaluated (Orozco<br />

et al., 2011b). However, a system enabling the i<strong>de</strong>ntification of a broad<br />

spectrum of toxic algal species and the in situ quantification of very low<br />

cell concentrations of cells is still unavailable and very much nee<strong>de</strong>d.<br />

3.3 Future prospects<br />

In the past <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>, the application of biosensor technology has gained<br />

significant impact in microbial <strong>ecology</strong>. In the European Union (EU)<br />

FP6-project Alaga<strong>de</strong>c, a portable semi-automated electrochemical biosensor-system<br />

was <strong>de</strong>veloped in or<strong>de</strong>r to facilitate the <strong>de</strong>tection of toxic<br />

algae in the field. This <strong>de</strong>vice enables the electrochemical <strong>de</strong>tection of<br />

microalgae from water samples in less than two hours, without the need<br />

of expensive equipment. In the future, autonomous biosensors will be<br />

combined with in situ measurement systems <strong>for</strong> monitoring of the marine<br />

environment. The Scholin chemiluminescent SHA has been adapted <strong>for</strong><br />

real time measurements in a buoy, the environmental sample processor


Part II – Chapter 3 151<br />

(ESP, Greenfield et al., 2006). Toxin analysis by antibody/antigen <strong>de</strong>tection<br />

methods (Elisa) and most recently qPCR (Preston et al., 2011) have<br />

also been ad<strong>de</strong>d to this plat<strong>for</strong>m, which will serve the need <strong>for</strong> high resolution<br />

monitoring of marine phytoplankton in or<strong>de</strong>r to evaluate consequences<br />

of environmental change in the oceans.<br />

Whereas the chemiluminescent robotic system is already commercialised,<br />

the hand held electrochemical <strong>de</strong>vice is still a prototype and is<br />

not available <strong>for</strong> purchase. Nevertheless, probes exist only <strong>for</strong> a limited<br />

number of phytoplankton and must be validated <strong>for</strong> each region where<br />

they are applied, calibration curves must be generated <strong>for</strong> each probe<br />

set, and high sample volume (ca. 5L) are required if the cell <strong>de</strong>nsities are<br />

relatively low (un<strong>de</strong>r the limit of <strong>de</strong>tection of the methods). Validation<br />

of probe signals against total rRNA and over the growth cycle of the<br />

algae un<strong>de</strong>r different environmental conditions has to be carried out to<br />

infer cell numbers be<strong>for</strong>e the method can be applied to wild samples. In<br />

addition, manual RNA isolation should be done by a trained molecular<br />

scientist, because a large amount of good quality target rRNA is required<br />

<strong>for</strong> these assays. The manual isolation of RNA is currently the limiting<br />

factor of all systems. It has been found out that different users can isolate<br />

different qualities of rRNA from the same sample. An automated RNA<br />

isolation, <strong>de</strong>veloped during the Alga<strong>de</strong>c-project and the lysis methods<br />

available in Scholin’s environmental sample processor should overcome<br />

these difficulties.<br />

4. Microarrays-based method<br />

4.1. General principles<br />

At the core of the DNA microarray technology is a DNA microchip that<br />

contains an array of oligonucleoti<strong>de</strong>s, PCR-products, or cDNAs spotted<br />

onto a small surface, e.g. a glass sli<strong>de</strong>. Recently <strong>de</strong>veloped DNAmicroarray-technology<br />

allows the simultaneous analysis of up to 250,000<br />

probes at a time (Lockhart et al., 1996). DNA-microarray technology has<br />

enormous potential to be used as a method to analyse samples from complex<br />

environments, because it provi<strong>de</strong>s a rapid tool without a cultivation<br />

step. Target nucleic acids are labelled with a fluorescent dye prior to their<br />

hybridisation to the probes on the DNA chip. The fluorescence pattern<br />

on the DNA-chip after the hybridisation of the target DNA is then analysed<br />

with a fluorescent laser-scanner (DeRisi et al., 1997, see figure 4).<br />

When these probes <strong>de</strong>tect species, the microarray has been termed a phylochip<br />

and these are essentially barco<strong>de</strong>s <strong>for</strong> species and their automated<br />

application.


152 Biodiversity<br />

Figure 4: Spotting scheme <strong>for</strong> the first generation Midtal microarray. The microarray<br />

consists in two supergrids ma<strong>de</strong> out of four grids installed on a microscopic sli<strong>de</strong>.<br />

Each position in the grid represents a spot of ca. 50µm in diameter where a given<br />

probe is immobilised. Each probe (colour co<strong>de</strong>d) is spotted four times. This<br />

generation of the microarray has 960 spots, covering 112 probes <strong>for</strong> toxic algal<br />

species and higher taxon levels, and various positive and negative control probes.<br />

The basis of the immuno-microarray is an immunoassay that has been miniaturised.<br />

In immunoassays, a competitive <strong>for</strong>mat is applied where the antigens<br />

are miniaturised in diminutive spots on a small surface. Fluorescently<br />

labelled antibodies compete with the analytes in the sample to conjugate<br />

with the miniaturised antigen. Unbound antibodies from the sample are<br />

then free to bind to the microarray, and the lower the signal, the higher the<br />

concentration of analytes (toxins) present in the field sample. Fluorescence<br />

emission is measured with techniques such as confocal or CCD microarray<br />

scanners. For optimal use in a monitoring program, it is absolutely necessary<br />

to validate the signal intensity against known cell counts un<strong>de</strong>r various<br />

environmental conditions, because absolute cell numbers are the basis <strong>for</strong><br />

HAb studies. The principal advantage of the method is that thousands of<br />

probes can be miniaturised on a single chip. The primary disadvantage is


Part II – Chapter 3 153<br />

the high cost, which is a ca. 25€ per sample (Gescher et al., 2010) and the<br />

need to make a calibration curve <strong>for</strong> each probe on the chip.<br />

The first DNA-microchip to study microbial diversity was to analyse samples<br />

from nitrifying bacteria, which are difficult to study by cultivation<br />

(Guschin et al., 1997). A hierarchical set of oligonucleoti<strong>de</strong> probes targeting<br />

the 16S ribosomal RNA was created to analyse the bacterial samples on the<br />

DNA-chip. Hierarchical ribosomal RNA probes are now available <strong>for</strong> many<br />

species of algae (Groben and Medlin, 2005), and some of them are available<br />

in a microarray <strong>for</strong>mat (Metfies and Medlin, 2004, Gescher et al., 2008a;<br />

2008b, Midtal: www.midtal.com). These techniques have been tested in the<br />

field and have shown congruence with results obtained by flow cytometry<br />

and FISH hybridisation (Metfies et al., 2010; Gescher et al., 2008b).<br />

4.2. Case studies of harmful algae<br />

There are no published case studies directly applying microarrays to toxic<br />

algae. However, microarrays have been the subject of several EU projects.<br />

In FP5 Picodiv and Micropad projects, microarrays were <strong>de</strong>veloped <strong>for</strong><br />

algae and protozoa, and results from chip hybridisation were favourably<br />

compared to other measurements of diversity, i.e., direct cell counts and<br />

clone libraries (Medlin et al., 2006). In these two projects, the microarrays<br />

were in early stages of <strong>de</strong>velopment and proof of principle was the major<br />

outcome because it was discovered that probes ma<strong>de</strong> <strong>for</strong> fluorescence in situ<br />

hybridization (FISH) could not be directly transferred to a microarray chip<br />

<strong>for</strong>mat (Metfies and Medlin, 2008). With a few exceptions, nearly every<br />

probe had to be modified <strong>for</strong> a successful use in the microarray chip <strong>for</strong>mat.<br />

Problems with transferring FISH probes to a microarray chip <strong>for</strong>mat<br />

led workers in the EU project Midichip to modify their probes and microarrays<br />

<strong>for</strong> cyanobacteria. The updated method involved additional steps as<br />

compared to the one step hybridisation found on most microarrays. The<br />

FP6 project FISH AND CHIPS ma<strong>de</strong> use of prototype findings to <strong>de</strong>velop<br />

a microarray chip <strong>for</strong> phytoplankton at the class level. Field data were analysed<br />

over three years with rRNA as the preferred target molecule (Gescher<br />

et al., 2008b, Metfies et al., 2010). A microarray <strong>for</strong> toxic species in the<br />

dinoflagellate genus Alexandrium was also <strong>de</strong>veloped but not field tested<br />

(Gescher et al., 2008a). In the EU project Aquachip, pathogenic bacteria<br />

were the target of interest. This project <strong>de</strong>veloped a chip <strong>for</strong> five bacteria<br />

but they were not wi<strong>de</strong>ly tested with environmental samples. In addition,<br />

the <strong>de</strong>tection system <strong>de</strong>veloped <strong>for</strong> this chip was based on a microtiter plate<br />

system with <strong>de</strong>tection un<strong>de</strong>r a fluorescent microscope. This is not a standard<br />

protocol that can be used in a commercial microarray chip rea<strong>de</strong>r, and<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e was never commercialised. In EU FP7 project Midtal (www.midtal.com),<br />

a species microarray with 163 hierarchical probes <strong>for</strong> species of


154 Biodiversity<br />

toxic algae is in early stages of <strong>de</strong>velopment (figure 4). Field testing has just<br />

begun with high correlation between microarray signal intensity and field<br />

counts. The toxin microarray in Midtal, which is based on surface plasmon<br />

resonance, <strong>de</strong>tects changes in mass when the antibody binds to the toxin.<br />

This microarray can simultaneously <strong>de</strong>tect 4 different toxins (saxitoxins,<br />

neosaxitoxin, okadaic acid, and domoic acid) in a competitive assay <strong>for</strong>mat.<br />

4.3. Future prospects<br />

A common problem in all of the phylochip assays is the wi<strong>de</strong> variation in<br />

signal strength of the various probes. In Midtal, the signal of the probes<br />

on the microarrays was enhanced by increasing probe length to 25 nucleoti<strong>de</strong>s<br />

instead of 18 and also by adding a longer spacer region to lift the<br />

probes above the surface of the microarray so that there is more space <strong>for</strong><br />

the hybridisation to occur. A fragmentation protocol to break the RNA<br />

into small pieces has also been optimised to prevent strong secondary<br />

structure <strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> signal enhancement (figure 5). Calibration curves<br />

will be produced <strong>for</strong> each probe on the microarray. This is the most timeconsuming<br />

step nee<strong>de</strong>d to make the microarray quantitative because culture<br />

experiments have to be established to measure the amount of RNA<br />

per cell un<strong>de</strong>r different abiotic conditions and to equate RNA content to<br />

cell numbers accurately. However, once these calibrations are done, the<br />

microarray becomes a very valuable and fast tool to measure community<br />

responses over broad ranges in space and time.<br />

Figure 5: Hybridisation of fragmented RNA in increasing fragmentation temperature.<br />

The probes tested in this study are: bathy01 (a), Pra507 (b), Chlo02 (c), Crypt01 (d),<br />

CryptoA (e), Crypt01-25A (f), Crypt03-26 (g), ATWE03 (h), DinoE-12 (i), LPoLyJ<br />

(j), Prym01-A (k), Pela02 (l), PNFRAGA (m), Psnmulti A-17 (n), Psn seriA+11 (o), and<br />

NS04 (p). Probes with lower signals are enhanced by fragmentation by increasing<br />

temperatures from 40°C to 70°C. Data shown are the signal to noise ratio of the<br />

hybridisation signal according to the probes tested at different temperatures.


Part II – Chapter 3 155<br />

Authors’ references<br />

Linda K. Medlin:<br />

Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Laboratoire d’Océanographie Microbienne,<br />

UPMC-CNRS UMR 7621, Banyuls-sur-mer, France<br />

Jahir Orozco-Holguin:<br />

University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, San Diego (UCSD), Department of Nano-<br />

Engineering, La Jolla, USA<br />

Kerstin Toebe:<br />

Alfred Wegeneer Institute <strong>for</strong> Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven,<br />

Germany<br />

Corresponding author: Linda K. Medlin, medlin@obs-banyuls.fr<br />

Aknowledgement<br />

J.O. was supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship from The Institut National<br />

<strong>de</strong>s Sciences <strong>de</strong> l’Univers (INSU), France. This work was partially supported<br />

by EU FP7 MIDTAL.<br />

References<br />

An<strong>de</strong>rson D. M., Kulis D., Erdner D., Ahn S., Walt D., 2006. Fibre optic<br />

microarrays <strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>tection and enumeration of harmful algal bloom<br />

species. African Journal of Marine science, 28, pp. 231-235.<br />

Amann R. I., Bin<strong>de</strong>r B. J., Olson R. J., Chrisholm S. W., Devereux R., Stahl<br />

D. A., 1990. Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleoti<strong>de</strong> probes<br />

with flow cytometry <strong>for</strong> analyzing mixed microbial populations. Applied<br />

and Environmental Microbiology, 56, pp. 1919-1925.<br />

Ayers K., Rho<strong>de</strong>s L. L., Tyrrell J., Gladstone M., Scholin C. A., 2005.<br />

International accreditation of sandwich hybridization assay <strong>for</strong>mat DNA<br />

probes <strong>for</strong> micro-algae. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater<br />

research, 39, pp. 1225-1231.<br />

Bowers H. A., Tengs T., Glasgow H. B., Burkhol<strong>de</strong>r J. M., Rublee P. A., Oldach<br />

D. W., 2000. Development of real-time PCR assays <strong>for</strong> rapid <strong>de</strong>tection of<br />

Pfiesteria piscicida and related dinoflagellates. Applied and Environmental<br />

microbiology, 66, pp. 4641-4648.<br />

Bowers H. A., Tomas C., Kempton J. W., Lewitus A. J., Tengs T., Oldach<br />

D. W., 2006. Raphidophyceae (Cha<strong>de</strong>faud ex Silva) systematics and rapid


156 Biodiversity<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntification: Sequence analyses and real-time PCR assays. Journal of<br />

Phycology, 42, pp. 1333-1348.<br />

Bowers H. A., 2008. Development and application of real-time PCR assays <strong>for</strong><br />

the study of Harmful Algal Bloom (HAB) species, PhD thesis. University<br />

of Kalmar, Swe<strong>de</strong>n, Dissertation Series 55.<br />

Cardullo R. A., Agrawal S., Flores C., Zamecnik P. C., Wolf D. E., 1988.<br />

Detection of nucleic acid hybridization by nonradiative fluorescence<br />

resonance energy transfer. Proceedings of the National Aca<strong>de</strong>my of<br />

Sciences of the USA, 85, pp. 8790-8794.<br />

Coyne, K.J., Handy, S.M., Demir, E., Whereat, E.B., Hutchins, D.A., Portune,<br />

K.J., Doblin, M.A., Cary, S.C., 2005. Improved quantitative real-time PCR<br />

assays <strong>for</strong> enumeration of harmful algal species in field samples using an<br />

exogenous DNA reference standard. Limnolology and Oceanography:<br />

Methods, 5, 389-391.<br />

DeRisi J. L., Iyer V. R., Brown P. O., 1997. Exploring the metabolic and genetic<br />

control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science, 278, pp. 680-686.<br />

Diercks S., Gescher C., Metfies K., Medlin L. K., 2009. Evaluation of locked<br />

nucleic acids <strong>for</strong> signal enhancement of oligonucleoti<strong>de</strong> probes <strong>for</strong> microalgae<br />

immobilised on solid surfaces. Journal of Applied Phycology, 21, pp. 657-668.<br />

Diercks S., Medlin L. K., Metfies K., 2008a. Colorimetric <strong>de</strong>tection of the toxic<br />

dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum using sandwich hybridization in a<br />

microtiter plate assay. Harmful Algae, 7, pp. 137-145.<br />

Diercks S., Metfies K., Medlin L. K., 2008b. Development and adaptation of<br />

a multiprobe biosensor <strong>for</strong> the use in a semi-automated <strong>de</strong>vice <strong>for</strong> the<br />

<strong>de</strong>tection of toxic algae. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 23, pp. 1527-1533.<br />

Diercks S., Metfies K., Medlin L. K., 2008c. Molecular probe sets <strong>for</strong> the<br />

<strong>de</strong>tection of toxic algae <strong>for</strong> use in sandwich hybridization <strong>for</strong>mats. Journal<br />

of Plankton Research, 30, pp. 439-448.<br />

Diercks-Horn S., Metfies K., Jäckel S., Medlin L. K., 2011. The Alga<strong>de</strong>c <strong>de</strong>vice: a<br />

semi-automated rRNA biosensor <strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>tection of toxic algae. Harmful<br />

Algae, 10, pp. 395-401.<br />

Drummond T. G., Hill M. G., Barton J. K., 2003. Electrochemical DNA<br />

sensors. Nature Biotechnology, 21, pp. 1192-1199.<br />

Dyhrman S. T., Erdner D., La Du J., Galac M., An<strong>de</strong>rson D.M., 2006. Molecular<br />

quantification of toxic Alexandrium fundyense in the Gulf of Maine using<br />

real-time PCR. Harmful Algae, 5, pp. 242-250.<br />

Dyhrman S. T., Haley S. T., Borchert J. A., Lona B., Kollars N., Erdner D. L.,<br />

2010. Parallel analyses of Alexandrium catenella cell concentrations<br />

and shellfish toxicity in the Puget Sound. Applied and Environmental<br />

Microbiology, 76, pp. 4647-4654.<br />

Erdner D. L., Percy L., Keafer B., Lewis J., An<strong>de</strong>rson D. M., 2010. A quantitative<br />

real-time PCR assay <strong>for</strong> The i<strong>de</strong>ntifcation and enumeration of Alexandrium<br />

cysts in the marine sediments. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies<br />

in Oceanography, 57, pp. 279-287.


Part II – Chapter 3 157<br />

Fitzpatrick E., Caron D. A., Schnetzer A., 2010. Development and environmental<br />

application of a genus-specific quantitative PCR approach <strong>for</strong> Pseudonitzschia<br />

species. Marine Biology, 157, pp. 1161-1169.<br />

Galluzzi L., Penna A., Bertozzini E., Vila M., Garcés E., Magnani M.,<br />

2004. Development of a real-time PCR assay <strong>for</strong> rapid <strong>de</strong>tection and<br />

quantification of Alexandrium minutum (a dinoflagellate). Applied and<br />

Environmental Microbiology, 70, pp. 1199-1206<br />

Galluzzi L., Bertozzini E., Penna A., Perini F., Pigalarga A., Graneli E.,<br />

Magnani M., 2008. Detection and quantification of Prymnesium parvum<br />

(Haptophyceae) by real-time PCR. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 46,<br />

pp. 261-266<br />

Gescher C., Metfies K., Medlin L. K., 2008a. The Alex Chip – Development of<br />

a DNA chip <strong>for</strong> i<strong>de</strong>ntification and monitoring of Alexandrium. Harmful<br />

Algae, 7, pp. 485-494.<br />

Gescher C., Metfies K., Frickenhaus S., Knelfelkamp B., Wiltshire K. M.,<br />

Medlin L. K., 2008b. Feasibility of assessing community composition<br />

of prasinophytes at the Helgoland Ree<strong>de</strong> sampling site with a DNA-<br />

Microarray. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74, pp. 5305-5316.<br />

Gescher C., Metfies K., Medlin L. K., 2010. Hybridization and microarray<br />

fluorescent <strong>de</strong>tection of phytoplankton, in: Karlson B., Cusack C.,<br />

Bresnan E. (Eds): Microscopic and molecular methods <strong>for</strong> quantitative<br />

phytoplankton analysis, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission<br />

of UNESCO (IOC), Manuals and gui<strong>de</strong>s, 50, pp. 77-86.<br />

Giovannoni S. J., Britschgi T.B., Moyer C.L., Field K. G., 1990. Genetic diversity<br />

in Sargasso Sea bacterioplankton. Nature, 345, pp. 60-63.<br />

Greenfield D. I., Marin R., Jensen S., Massion E., Roman B., Feldman J.,<br />

Scholin C. A., 2006. Application of environmental sample processor (ESP)<br />

methodology <strong>for</strong> quantifying Pseudo-nitzschia australis using ribosomal<br />

RNA-targeted probes in sandwich and fluorescent in situ hybridization<br />

<strong>for</strong>mats. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 4, pp. 426-435.<br />

Groben R., John U., Eller G., Lange M., Medlin L. K., 2004. Using fluorescently<br />

labelled rRNA probes <strong>for</strong> hierarchical estimation of phytoplankton<br />

diversity, a mini review. Nova Hedwigia, 79, pp. 313-320.<br />

Groben R., Medlin L. K., 2005. In situ hybridisation of phytoplankton using<br />

fluorescently-labelled rRNA Probes. Methods in Enzymology, 395,<br />

pp. 299-310.<br />

Guillou L., Chrétiennot-Dinet M.-J., Medlin L. K., Claustre H., Loiseaux-<strong>de</strong><br />

Goer S., Vaulot D., 1999. Bolidomonas: a new genus with two species<br />

belonging to new algal class, the Bolidophyceae (Heterokonta). Journal of<br />

Phycology, 35, pp. 368-381.<br />

Guschin D. Y., Mobarry B. K., Proudnikov D., Stahl D. A., Rittmann B. E.,<br />

Mirzabekov A. D., 1997. Oligonucleoti<strong>de</strong> microchips as genosensors <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>de</strong>terminative and environmental studies in microbiology. Applied and<br />

Environmental Microbiology, 63, pp. 2397-2402.


158 Biodiversity<br />

Hallegraeff G. M., 1993. A review of harmful algal blooms and their apparent<br />

global increase. Phycologia, 32, pp. 79-99.<br />

Handy S. M., Hutchins D. A., Cary S. C., Coyne K. J., 2006. Simultaneous<br />

enumeration of multiple raphidophyte species by quantitative realtime<br />

PCR: capabilities and limitations. Limnology and Oceanography:<br />

Methods, 4, pp. 193-204.<br />

Handy S. M., Demir E., Hutchins D. A., Portune K. J., Whereat E. B., Hare<br />

C. E., Rose J. M., Warner M., Farestad M., Cary S. C., Coyne K. J., 2008.<br />

Using quantitative real-time PCR to study competition and community<br />

dynamics among Delaware Inland Bays harmful algae in field and<br />

laboratory studies. Harmful Algae, 7, pp. 599-613.<br />

Hei<strong>de</strong>nreich B., Pohlmann C., Sprinzl M., Gareis M., 2010. Detection of<br />

Escherichia coli in meat with an electrochemical biochip. Journal of Food<br />

Protection, 73, pp. 2025-2033.<br />

Hosoi-Tanabe S., Sako Y., 2005. Species-specific <strong>de</strong>tection and quantification<br />

of toxic marine dinoflagellates Alexandrium tamarense and A. catenella by<br />

real-time PCR assay. Marine Biotechnology, 7, pp. 506-514<br />

Kamikawa, R., Asai, J., Miyahara, T., Murata, K., Q yama, K., Yoshimatsu,<br />

S., Yoshida, T. Sako, Y., 2006. Application of a real-time pcr assay to a<br />

comprehensive method of monitoring of harmful algae. Micro. Environ.<br />

21, 163-173.<br />

Kamikawa R., Nagai S., Hosoi-Tanabe S., Itakura S., Yamaguchi M., Uchida Y.,<br />

Baba T., Sako Y., 2007. Application of real-time PCR assay <strong>for</strong> <strong>de</strong>tection<br />

and quantification of Alexandrium catenella cysts from marine sediments.<br />

Harmful Algae, 6, pp. 413-420.<br />

Kavanagh S., Brennan C., O’Connor L., Moran S., Salas R., Lyons J., Silke J.,<br />

Maher M., 2010. Real-time PCR <strong>de</strong>tection of Dinophysis species in Irish<br />

coastal waters. Marine Biotechnology, 12, pp. 534-542.<br />

Ku<strong>de</strong>la R. M., Howard M. D. A., Jenkins B. D., Miller P. E., Smith G. E.,<br />

2010. Using the molecular toolbox to compare harmful algal blooms in<br />

upwelling systems. Progress in Oceanography, 85, pp. 108-121.<br />

Liao J. C., Mastali M., Li y., Gau V., Suchard M. A., babbitt J., Gornbein<br />

J., Landaw E. M., McCabe E. R. b., Churchill b. M., Haake D. A.,<br />

2007. Development of an advanced electrochemical DNA biosensor<br />

<strong>for</strong> bacterial pathogen <strong>de</strong>tection. Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 9,<br />

pp. 158-168.<br />

Lim E. L., Dennett M.R., Caron D.A., 1999. The <strong>ecology</strong> of Paraphysomonas<br />

imper<strong>for</strong>ata based on studies employing oligonucleoti<strong>de</strong> probe i<strong>de</strong>ntification<br />

on coastal water samples and enrichment cultures. Limnology and<br />

Oceanography, 44, pp. 37-51.<br />

Liu M. C., Zhao G. H., Tang Y. T., Yu Z. M., Lei Y. Z., Li M. F., Zhang Y., Li<br />

D. M., 2010. A simple, stable and picomole level lead sensor fabricated<br />

on DNA-based carbon hybridized TiO2 nanotube arrays. Environmental<br />

Science and Technology, 44, pp. 4241-4246.


Part II – Chapter 3 159<br />

López-Garcia P., Rodriguez-Valera F., Pedros-Alio C., Moreira D., 2001.<br />

Unexpected diversity of small eukaryotes in <strong>de</strong>ep-sea Antarctic plankton.<br />

Nature, 409, pp. 603-607.<br />

Manning S. R., La Claire J. W., 2010. Multiplex PCR methods <strong>for</strong> the speciesspecific<br />

<strong>de</strong>tection and quantification of Prymnesium parvum (Haptophyta).<br />

Journal of Applied Phycology, 22, pp. 587-597.<br />

Medlin L. K., Metfies K., Mehl H., Wiltshire K., Valentin K., 2006. Picoplankton<br />

diversity at the Helgoland time series site as assessed by three molecular<br />

methods. Microbial Ecology, 167, pp. 1432-1451.<br />

Metfies K., Huljic S., Lange M., Medlin L. K., 2005. Electrochemical <strong>de</strong>tection<br />

of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium ostenfeldii with a DNA-biosensor.<br />

Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 20, pp. 1349-1357.<br />

Metfies K., Gescher C., Frickenhaus S., Niestroy R., Wichels A., Gerdts G.,<br />

Knefelkamp B., Wiltshire K., Medlin L. K., 2010. Contribution of the<br />

class Cryptophyceae to phytoplankton structure in the German Bight.<br />

Journal of Phycology, 46, pp. 1152-1160.<br />

Metfies K., Medlin L. K., 2004. DNA-microchips <strong>for</strong> phytoplankton: The<br />

fluorescent wave of the future. Nova Hedwigia, 79, pp. 321-327.<br />

Metfies K., Medlin L. K., 2008. Feasibility of transferring FISH-probes to an<br />

18S rRNA gene-phylochip and a mapping of signal intensities. Applied<br />

and Environmental Microbiology, 74, pp. 2814-2821.<br />

Metfies K., Medlin L. K., 2007. Refining cryptophyte i<strong>de</strong>ntification with DNAmicroarrays.<br />

Journal of Plankton Research, 29, pp. 1071-1076.<br />

Mikulski C. M., Park Y. T., Jones K. L., Lee C. K., Limb W. A., Lee Y., Scholin<br />

C. A., Doucette G. J., 2008. Development and field application of rRNAtargeted<br />

probes <strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>tection of Cochlodinium polykrikoi<strong>de</strong>s Margalef<br />

in Korean coastal waters using whole cell and sandwich hybridization<br />

<strong>for</strong>mats. Harmful Algae, 7, pp. 347-359.<br />

Miller P. E., Scholin C. A., 1998. I<strong>de</strong>ntification and enumeration of cultured and<br />

wild Pseudo-nitzschia (Bacillariophyceae) using species specific LSU rRNA<br />

–targeted fluorescent probes and filter-based whole cell hybridization.<br />

Journal of Phycology, 34, pp. 371-382.<br />

Moon-van <strong>de</strong>r Staay S. Y., De Wachter R., Vaulot D., 2001. Oceanic 18S rDNA<br />

sequences from picoplankton reveal unsuspected eukaryotic diversity.<br />

Nature, 409, pp. 607-610.<br />

Moorthi S. D., Countway P. D., Stauffer b. A., Caron D. A., 2006. Use<br />

of quantitative real-time PCR to investigate the dynamics of the red<br />

ti<strong>de</strong> dinoflagellate Lingulodinium polyedrum. Microbial Ecology, 52,<br />

pp. 136-150<br />

Nolan T., 2004. Getting started-the basics of setting up a qPCR assay, in: Bustin<br />

S. A. (Ed.), A-Z of quantitative PCR. International University Line, La<br />

Jolla, pp. 527-544.<br />

O’Halloran C., Silver M. W., Holman T. R., Scholin C. A., 2006. Heterosigma<br />

akashiwo in central Cali<strong>for</strong>nia waters. Harmful Algae, 5, pp. 124-132.


160 Biodiversity<br />

Orozco J., Medlin L. K., 2011a. Electrochemical per<strong>for</strong>mance of a DNA-based<br />

sensor <strong>de</strong>vice <strong>for</strong> <strong>de</strong>tecting toxic algae. <strong>Sensors</strong> and Actuators B: Chemical,<br />

153, pp. 71-77.<br />

Orozco J., Baudart J., Medlin L. K., 2011b. Evaluation of probe orientation<br />

and effect of the digoxigenin-enzymatic label in a sandwich hybridization<br />

<strong>for</strong>mat to <strong>de</strong>velop toxic algae biosensors. Harmful Algae, 10, pp. 489-494.<br />

Park T. G., <strong>de</strong> Salas M. F., Bolch C. J. S., Hallegraeff G. M., 2007. Development<br />

of a real-time PCR probe <strong>for</strong> quantification of the heterotrophic<br />

dinoflagellate Cryptoperidiniopsis brodyi (Dinophyceae) in environmental<br />

samples. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73, pp. 2552-2560.<br />

Penna A., Magnani M., 1999. I<strong>de</strong>ntification of Alexandrium (Dinophyceae)<br />

species using PCR and rDNA-targeted probes. Journal of Phycology, 35,<br />

pp. 615-621.<br />

Preston C. M., Harris A., Ryan J. P., Roman B., Marin III R., Jensen S., Everlove<br />

C., Birch J., Dzenitis J. M., Pargett D., Adachi M., Turk K., Zehr J. P.,<br />

Scholin C. A., 2011. Un<strong>de</strong>rwater application of quantitative PCR on an<br />

ocean mooring. PloS One, 6, e22522.<br />

Rautio J., Barken K. B., Lah<strong>de</strong>npera J., Bretenstein A., Molin S., Neubauer P.,<br />

2003. Sandwich hybridization assay <strong>for</strong> quantitative <strong>de</strong>tection of yeast<br />

RNAs in cru<strong>de</strong> cell lysates. Microbial Cell Factories, 2, pp. 4.<br />

Ronkainen-Matsuno N. J., Thomas J. H., Halsall H. B., Heinemann W. R.,<br />

2002. Electrochemical immunoassay moving into the fast lane. Trends in<br />

Analytical Chemistry, 21, pp. 213-225.<br />

Saun<strong>de</strong>rs N. A., 2004. Introduction to Real-Time PCR, in: Edwards K. Logan<br />

J., Saun<strong>de</strong>rs N. A., (Eds.), Real-Time PCR. An Essential Gui<strong>de</strong>. Horizon<br />

Bioscience, Norfolk, pp. 1-11.<br />

Scholin C. A., Buck K. R., Britschig T., Cangelosi G., Chavez F. P., 1996.<br />

I<strong>de</strong>ntification of Pseudo-nitzschia australis (Bacillariophyceae) using<br />

rRNA-targeted probes in whole cell and sandwich hybridization <strong>for</strong>mats.<br />

Phycologia, 35, pp. 190-197.<br />

Scholin C. A., Marin III R., Miller P. E., Doucette G. J., Powell C. L., Haydock<br />

P., Howard J., Ray J., 1999. DNA probes and a receptor-binding assay<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>de</strong>tection of Pseudo-nitzschia (Bacillariophyceae) species and domoic<br />

acid activity in cultured and natural samples. Journal of Phycology, 35,<br />

pp. 1356-1367.<br />

Scholin C. A., Vrieling E., Peperzak L., Rho<strong>de</strong>s L., Rublee P., 2003. Detection<br />

of HAB species using lectin, antibody and DNA probes, in: Hallegraeff<br />

G. M., An<strong>de</strong>rson D. M., Cembella A. D. (Eds), Manual on harmful marine<br />

microalgae 11. Intergovernmental oceanographic commission of Unesco,<br />

Paris, pp. 131-164.<br />

Steidinger K. A., Landsberg J. H., Mason P. L., Vogelbein W. K., Tester P. A.,<br />

Litaker R. W., 2006. Cryptoperidiniopsis brodyi gen. et sp. nov. (Dinophyceae),<br />

a small lightly armoured dinoflagellate in the Pfiesteriaceae. Journal of<br />

Phycology, 42, pp. 951-961.


Part II – Chapter 3 161<br />

Thévenot D., Toth K., Durst R. A., Wilson G., 1999. Electrochemical biosensors:<br />

recommen<strong>de</strong>d <strong>de</strong>finitions and classification. Pure and Applied Chemistry,<br />

71, pp. 2333-2348.<br />

Touzet N., Keady E., Raine R., Maher M., 2009. Evaluation of taxa-specific<br />

real time PCR, whole-cell FISH and morphotaxonomy analyses <strong>for</strong> the<br />

<strong>de</strong>tection and quantification of the toxic microalgae Alexandrium minutum<br />

(Dinophyceae), Global Cla<strong>de</strong> ribotype. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 67,<br />

pp. 329-341.<br />

Tewhey R., Warner J. B., Nakano M., Libby B., Medkova M., David P. H,<br />

Kotsopoulos S. K., Samuels M. L., Hutchison J. B., Larson J. W., Topol E.<br />

J., Weiner M. P., Harismendy O., Olson J., Link D. R, Frazer K. A., 2009.<br />

Microdroplet-based PCR enrichment <strong>for</strong> large-scale targeted sequencing.<br />

Nature Biotechnology, 27, pp. 1025-1031.<br />

Tyrrell J. V., Connell L. B., Scholin C. A., 2002. Monitoring <strong>for</strong> Heterosigma<br />

akashiwo using a sandwich hybridization assay. Harmful Algae, 1,<br />

pp. 205-214.<br />

Wang J., 2006. Electrochemical biosensors: Towards point-of-care cancer<br />

diagnostics. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 21, pp. 1887-1892.<br />

Zammatteo N., Moris P., Alexandre I., Vaira D., Piette J., Remacle J., 1995.<br />

DNA probe hybridization in microwells using a new bioluminescent<br />

system <strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>tection of PCR-amplified HIV-1 proviral DNA. Journal<br />

of Virological Methods, 55, pp. 185-197.<br />

Zamor R. M., Glenn K. L., Hambright K. D., 2011. Incorporating molecular<br />

tools into routine HAB monitoring programs: using qPCR to track<br />

invasive Prymnesium. Harmful Algae, in press.<br />

Zhang H., Lin S., 2005. Development of a cob-18S rDNA real-time PCR assay<br />

<strong>for</strong> quantifying Pfiesteria shumwayae in the natural environment. Applied<br />

and Environmental Microbiology, 71, pp. 7053-7063.


Chapter 4<br />

Automatic particle analysis as sensors<br />

<strong>for</strong> life history studies in experimental<br />

microcosms<br />

François Mallard, Vincent Le Bourlot, Thomas Tully<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Biodiversity is expected to be heavily damaged by the alarming effects of<br />

climate change in the next <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s and centuries (Leadley et al., 2010).<br />

Assessing how populations will respond to environmental change is crucial<br />

if one wants to predict the consequences of global change on biodiversity.<br />

The <strong>de</strong>nsity, phenotypic structure and genetic composition of a<br />

population are shaped by extrinsic variations of the environment, intrinsic<br />

regulatory mechanisms such as <strong>de</strong>nsity <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce mechanisms, and<br />

complex interactions between both extrinsic and intrinsic factors. These<br />

processes <strong>de</strong>termine whether <strong>de</strong>leterious environmental changes can lead<br />

either to a local population extinction (Drake and Griffen, 2010; Griffen<br />

and Drake, 2008; Sinervo et al., 2010) or its rescue through plastic or<br />

genetic adaptation (Bell and Gonzalez, 2009; 2011; Chevin and Lan<strong>de</strong>,<br />

2010). Thus, it is especially important to monitor population changes and<br />

get accurate measurements of the factors that regulate the size and structure<br />

of a population so as to un<strong>de</strong>rstand how they will react to environmental<br />

changes.<br />

Studying how life history traits (individual fitness or <strong>de</strong>mographic components)<br />

respond to environmental changes is wi<strong>de</strong>ly done in evolutionary<br />

<strong>ecology</strong>. In this context, the most common traits un<strong>de</strong>r study in<br />

population dynamics are age and size at maturity, reproductive output<br />

(fecundity, egg size, intervals between reproductive events), longevity<br />

and mortality rates (Braendle et al., 2011). These traits are <strong>de</strong>termined


164 Biodiversity<br />

by a combination of genetic and environmental effects. When the value<br />

of a trait changes according to an environmental factor, it is consi<strong>de</strong>red<br />

as phenotypically plastic (Scheiner, 1993). The shape of its relationship<br />

with the environmental factor (also called a reaction norm) is essential to<br />

assess the population responses to environmental change (Flatt, 2005).<br />

By linking life-history variation with the genetic makeup of an organism,<br />

the interplay between population dynamics and evolutionary dynamics<br />

can also be addressed (Saccheri and Hanski, 2006). As a matter of fact,<br />

most populations are composed of a mixture of different categories of<br />

individuals and, even in an extreme case of a clonal population where all<br />

individuals share the same genotype, there is variation in age, size or body<br />

condition <strong>for</strong> instance.<br />

Life-history variation has to be taken into account and measured to better<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rstand how a population behaves (De Roos, 2008; Tuljapurkar<br />

et al., 2009). Thus, one of the dreams of a population ecologist would<br />

be to follow in parallel the dynamics and structure of a population,<br />

and the life-histories of every individual the population is ma<strong>de</strong> up of.<br />

This would enable the un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of how population growth, population<br />

dynamics, individual phenotype and life-history traits influence<br />

one another (Pelletier et al., 2007; Coulson et al., 2006; ozgul et al.,<br />

2009; Pettorelli et al., 2011). Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, following simultaneously<br />

the dynamic of a whole population and the growth and reproductive<br />

trajectory of its individuals remains a Holy Grail quest especially <strong>for</strong><br />

animal populations in the wild because of the mobility and elusiveness<br />

of the tracked individuals. In this chapter, we discuss the use of<br />

a new generation of sensors, based on automated image analysis from<br />

microcosm experiments, to address limitations of ecological methods in<br />

previous studies.<br />

2. State of the art and objectives<br />

Several studies in the wild have quantified to which extent the population<br />

growth and dynamics are controlled by the un<strong>de</strong>rlying life-history strategies<br />

of individuals within the population (Coulson et al., 2006; Pettorelli<br />

et al., 2011). These studies are based on longitudinal follow-up both at<br />

the population and individual levels, the individuals being marked and<br />

recaptured. A longitudinal follow-up of individuals is crucial if one wants<br />

to address fundamental questions about the patterns of life-history traits<br />

throughout life. However, a longitudinal follow-up of wild animals is in<br />

general very time-consuming and can only be applied to a part of the<br />

studied population.


Part II – Chapter 4 165<br />

Given the difficulty of gathering relevant <strong>de</strong>mographic data on wild<br />

animals both at the population and individual levels, researchers have<br />

looked <strong>for</strong> complementary and more convenient experimental mo<strong>de</strong>l<br />

approaches, in particular microcosms experiments (Benton et al., 2007).<br />

Because of their relatively short generation time and ease of rearing, several<br />

small arthropods have been used as mo<strong>de</strong>l organisms in microcosm<br />

experiments in or<strong>de</strong>r to study in parallel population dynamics and lifehistory<br />

traits including Daphnia (Drake and Griffen, 2009; Hebert, 1978),<br />

Drosophila (Mueller et al., 2005), mites (Benton and Beckerman, 2005),<br />

and collembola (Ellers et al., 2011; Tully and Ferrière, 2008). Data collection,<br />

however, is often ma<strong>de</strong> visually in most microcosm experiments.<br />

This may be accurate enough when populations are sufficiently small and<br />

close to extinction (Drake and Lodge, 2004; Pike et al., 2004) but it<br />

becomes very time-consuming or impossible to do <strong>for</strong> larger populations.<br />

For instance, experimental mite populations are studied by daily<br />

counts of individuals using a binocular microscope and hand-held<br />

counter. When the <strong>de</strong>nsity is too high to be measured visually, it is<br />

estimated by extrapolating measurements ma<strong>de</strong> on a sub-sample of the<br />

population (Bowler and benton, 2011; Plaistow and benton, 2009). This<br />

procedure not only takes time but it is also prone to errors, including<br />

differences among observers, and it only gives coarse measurement of<br />

the life-history.<br />

Alternatively, measurements can be ma<strong>de</strong> on digital images of individuals<br />

or populations. Digital images are i<strong>de</strong>al sources of in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

<strong>for</strong> phenotypic and <strong>de</strong>mographic studies in microcosm experiments,<br />

because images can be collected very rapidly, they are cheap and can be<br />

stored and re-observed if necessary, and the procedure of taking images<br />

is generally harmless. For example, Stemman et al. (II, 2) <strong>de</strong>scribes how<br />

image analysis can be used to i<strong>de</strong>ntify and separate particles and plankton<br />

species by size in pelagic, marine environments. In images from<br />

microcosm experiments, the extraction of life-history data can be ma<strong>de</strong><br />

by hand on a computer using appropriate image analysis software such<br />

as ImageJ (Abramoff et al., 2004) to estimate <strong>for</strong> instance egg and body<br />

sizes (Tully and Ferrière, 2008). However, this non-automated procedure<br />

is time-consuming and quickly becomes impractical when one wants<br />

to closely follow hundreds of individuals each laying hundreds of eggs,<br />

or dozens or more populations composed of hundreds of individuals<br />

each. Automatic counting and measuring is then nee<strong>de</strong>d. Some commercial<br />

softwares provi<strong>de</strong> such services but they are often unaf<strong>for</strong>dable<br />

and closed source.<br />

Previous studies <strong>de</strong>signed and proposed image analysis methods to automatically<br />

track or count small organisms such as small arthropods in the<br />

laboratory (Krogh et al., 1998, Auclerc et al., 2010; Lukas et al., 2009).


166 Biodiversity<br />

The method of Krogh et al. (1998) is adapted <strong>for</strong> white collembolan<br />

species and requires immobilising the individuals by CO 2<br />

anaesthesia<br />

and transferring them on an even, black surface. The method there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

requires in practice long and <strong>de</strong>licate manipulations. Other image analysis<br />

methods usually require a very contrasted and even background,<br />

which is rarely the case in microcosms, or a polarised filter to prevent<br />

light reflection on the background. Hooper et al. (2006) <strong>de</strong>veloped an<br />

image analysis setup <strong>for</strong> measuring Daphnia population size, but this<br />

method does not allow recursive automatic counting because nondaphnid<br />

objects (noise and impurities on the glass) had to be manually<br />

<strong>de</strong>leted be<strong>for</strong>e automatic enumeration of the Daphnia on their pictures.<br />

Using these different methods as a routine <strong>for</strong> counting and measuring<br />

individuals in an experimental population must there<strong>for</strong>e be banished.<br />

Some authors have used morphological image processing tools to reduce<br />

the noise in the background and help to i<strong>de</strong>ntify the individuals (here<br />

collembolan) on the images (Marçal and Carida<strong>de</strong>, 2006). However, this<br />

method is prone to errors: it does not permit the elimination of particles<br />

that look like collembolans and <strong>de</strong>ad collembolans will be counted and<br />

measured.<br />

We present hereafter a method that we <strong>de</strong>veloped to automate the measurements<br />

of i) some fundamental life-history traits (size, growth, fecundity)<br />

of a collembolan that is used as a mo<strong>de</strong>l organism and ii) the<br />

<strong>de</strong>nsity and fine scale size structure of collembolan populations reared<br />

in microcosms. Our method can be applied in general to count and<br />

measure some animals (or some particles) that are moving on a motionless<br />

background. It requires simple material (a digital camera, a stand<br />

and a good lighting <strong>de</strong>vice) and the freely available, open-source image<br />

processing software ImageJ (Abràmoff et al., 2004). We first give some<br />

<strong>de</strong>tails about our mo<strong>de</strong>l organism be<strong>for</strong>e presenting the principle of<br />

our method and the <strong>de</strong>vice settings that we use. We then explain more<br />

precisely how the images are processed to extract relevant in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

from the background. Lastly, examples of analyses with large data sets<br />

collected a on large number of individuals are presented, such as the<br />

follow-up of growth trajectory of isolated individuals, the growth of a<br />

cohort, or the fluctuations of both population size and structure.


Part II – Chapter 4 167<br />

3. Description of the methods<br />

3.1. The biological mo<strong>de</strong>l<br />

In our study, we used the springtail Folsomia candida (Collembola,<br />

Isotomidae) as a mo<strong>de</strong>l organism. This species is convenient to breed in<br />

the laboratory (Fountain and Hopkin, 2005) and is used as a mo<strong>de</strong>l organism<br />

in ecotoxicology, <strong>ecology</strong> and evolution (Fountain and Hopkin, 2001;<br />

Tully and Lambert, 2011). The collembolans are bred in small boxes of<br />

about 5cm in diameter whose bottoms have been filled with a 2 to 3cm<br />

thick layer of plaster of Paris. Plaster of Paris is perfect <strong>for</strong> growing collembolans<br />

since it keeps a high level of moisture in the boxes. It also has<br />

the advantage of providing a flat two-dimensional environment, which<br />

is i<strong>de</strong>al to observe and count all the creepy-crawlies wan<strong>de</strong>ring in the<br />

box. To enhance the contrast between the collembolans that are white<br />

and their background, the plaster was darkened with some Indian ink.<br />

However, a completely dark and homogeneous background is not necessary<br />

<strong>for</strong> efficient image processing (see below). More <strong>de</strong>tails about our<br />

rearing conditions of the collembolan can be found in Tully and Ferrière<br />

(2008) and Tully and Lambert (2011).<br />

3.2. Camera settings and lighting unit<br />

We used a digital camera (Nikon D300) equipped with a 60mm macro<br />

lens and fixed on a camera stand. The camera is connected to a computer<br />

and is driven through the software Camera Control Pro from Nikon that<br />

enables the adjustment and control of the camera settings (figure 1). We<br />

took some 8 bit grey pictures of 4,288 × 2,848 pixels, saved as slightly<br />

compressed .JPEG files. We used several LED bulbs such as powerful<br />

Pikaline bulbs (16W, 650 lumens) that generate relatively constant, homogeneous<br />

and strong lighting. The lighting unit has to provi<strong>de</strong> a light as<br />

homogeneous as possible but our image analysis can compensate <strong>for</strong> some<br />

heterogeneity in the lighting as discussed below. However, the stability of<br />

lighting conditions between pictures in a stack is more important. The<br />

powerful lighting unit enables to shoot with short aperture time (1/100)<br />

and small aperture (F36), which ensures sharp pictures with large <strong>de</strong>pth of<br />

field. Artificial lighting using fluorescent light bulbs is not recommen<strong>de</strong>d<br />

because the light intensity fluctuates at 50Hz frequency, which generates<br />

substantial lighting heterogeneity between pictures when using an aperture<br />

time shorter than 1/50s. We also avoid using incan<strong>de</strong>scent light bulbs<br />

since they produce a lot of heat that can harm or disturb our organisms.


168 Biodiversity<br />

Figure 1: The camera stand with the camera and the LED lighting unit on, ready to<br />

take pictures of the rearing box in the centre.<br />

3.3 Principle of analysis<br />

Our method consists in taking a set of several (usually three to five) images<br />

of our rearing boxes un<strong>de</strong>r the same conditions. Between each image of a<br />

box, we blow lightly in it to ensure that each living individual has moved<br />

between the first and the last shot. These images are then compared using<br />

the ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) to generate a new image<br />

composed of all elements that remained motionless within the set (figure<br />

2). This generated image, called the still background, is then subtracted<br />

to each picture. This produces a stack of images that only contains the<br />

mobile elements, here the collembolans that have moved between pictures.<br />

These elements are then counted and measured after scaling the images.


Part II – Chapter 4 169<br />

Figure 2: The principle of image analysis using the ImageJ multitracker procedure.<br />

A. one of the images of the original set. Left, the rearing box contains a population<br />

of collembolans and can be scaled relative to a graph paper (on the top) or a black<br />

square automatically recognised by the plugin. Right, a <strong>de</strong>tailed view of one area<br />

of the rearing box. B. The motionless image obtained by comparing four different<br />

pictures from the same set to keep the elements that did not move. This motionless<br />

image is then used to <strong>de</strong>tect the outline of the box – the area of interest to <strong>de</strong>tect<br />

particles (C). D. A subtraction between the original image and the motionless<br />

picture followed by a thresholding procedure yields a new image where the particles<br />

can be counted and measured.


170 Biodiversity<br />

The structure and size of the population is stored in a text file. The principle<br />

of this analysis is inspired by the particle analysis procedure <strong>de</strong>veloped<br />

in the ImageJ multitracker plugin (Kuhn, 2001). An almost perfectly even<br />

and contrasted background is not nee<strong>de</strong>d to calculate the still background,<br />

which allows the measurements to be taken directly in the rearing boxes<br />

and minimise disturbances (see figures 2, 3 and 4). Only the moving particles<br />

are measured so that <strong>de</strong>ad animals are discar<strong>de</strong>d from the counting.<br />

3.4. Image analysis<br />

Once the still background is removed from the set of pictures, the ImageJ<br />

software can be used to count and measure the particles. A thresholding<br />

procedure is then nee<strong>de</strong>d to trans<strong>for</strong>m our 8-bits image that contains 256<br />

levels of grey into a black and white 2-bits image. One has to choose a<br />

threshold value that is the grey level above which the pixels will become<br />

white and un<strong>de</strong>r-which they will become dark. It is then possible to count<br />

and measure the white particle on the black background (figure 3). To<br />

facilitate this thresholding procedure when a single picture is analysed,<br />

users have to i) control the overall luminosity on each picture and to<br />

ii) maximise the contrast between the particles of interest and its background.<br />

The first constraint ensures selecting particles with the same precision<br />

within a picture (homogeneous lighting). The second one allows<br />

getting a straight discrimination between particles and the background<br />

such that precise and repeatable measurements can be obtained with different<br />

thresholds in a broa<strong>de</strong>r range of values.<br />

Our measurement method guarantees great precision while allowing a<br />

reliable automatic thresholding: removing the motionless background<br />

corrects relative lack of enlightenment homogeneity and increases the<br />

contrast between moving particles and the background that becomes<br />

homogeneously black (figure 3). The user no longer needs to choose by<br />

hand an appropriate threshold and the software can be programmed to<br />

automatically run the analyses. However, our method is sensitive to local<br />

variations of lighting between pictures within the stack. In some cases,<br />

the moving particles can create shadows that darken their surrounding<br />

substrate, which may reduce the efficiency of the removal of the motionless<br />

pixels. This may generate some noise in the background. Providing<br />

omnidirectional lighting reduces the <strong>for</strong>mation of shadows and easily<br />

prevents these annoying effects.


Part II – Chapter 4 171<br />

Figure 3: Comparison of two particle analysis methods. A. The original picture to be<br />

analysed: the collembolans lay on an inhomogeneous substrate. B, C and D. The same<br />

picture from which a thresholding procedure has been applied. In B, the motionless<br />

background has been removed be<strong>for</strong>e the process and the particles are reliably<br />

<strong>de</strong>tected. Without removal of the motionless background, no threshold level gives<br />

satisfying results: in C, the threshold level is too low and some unwanted background<br />

elements are kept (red arrow); whereas in D, the level is both too high to select all the<br />

individuals (red arrow) and too low to remove all the non-living elements.<br />

3.5. Time requirement and versatility<br />

This automatic particle measuring and counting method enabled us to<br />

analyse a large number of samples in a relatively short amount of time.<br />

For instance, it takes about a little less than two hours to shoot a hundred<br />

populations (5 pictures/populations) and to sort these pictures on<br />

the computer. It then takes about one hour <strong>for</strong> the plugin to analyse the<br />

whole 500 pictures and count and measure all the individuals in these<br />

populations (20 to 30sec per set of 5 pictures on a 2.5GHz computer).<br />

Although the procedure was <strong>de</strong>veloped and adapted to our collembolan<br />

system, it is versatile enough to be tuned and adapted to many different<br />

systems as long as there is a still background on which some particles<br />

randomly move. To scale our measurements into millimetres rather than


172 Biodiversity<br />

pixels we <strong>de</strong>signed an automatic scaling script based on the recognition<br />

of a black square of a known area (see figure 2). Including the camera<br />

(Nikon D300s, about 1,200€), the lens (Nikon 60mm f/2.8G ED AF-S<br />

Micro NIKKOR, about 550€), the stand (starting at about 90€ <strong>for</strong> the<br />

Kaiser 5361) and the software Camera Control Pro (about 130€, running<br />

on both Mac and Windows computer), our measurement system costs<br />

about 2,000€.<br />

4. Case studies<br />

We use our automated particle analysis as a routine procedure in the<br />

laboratory. We <strong>de</strong>veloped several specific java-co<strong>de</strong>d plugins that we can<br />

directly run within ImageJ. The software allows us to choose between a<br />

large number of measurements per<strong>for</strong>med on each particle including position<br />

on the picture, area, and centre of mass, but also bounding rectangles<br />

or fitted ellipse parameters and many more. We present below different<br />

types of analyses based on this method to suggest i<strong>de</strong>as <strong>for</strong> broa<strong>de</strong>r applications.<br />

We recommend using the program R to manipulate and analyse<br />

such data (R Development Core Team, 2011).<br />

4.1. Movement analysis<br />

Our automated particle analysis was used to track an individual. We collected<br />

a set of pictures (1 every 6sec during about 3/4h) with a fixed webcam<br />

controlled by a webcam capture application (Dorgem, Fesevur). The<br />

different steps of the analyses are <strong>de</strong>scribed on figure 4. Some difficulties<br />

may arise from temporal variation in the still background, which is likely<br />

to occur from variation in light intensity or from some changes in the<br />

background due <strong>for</strong> instance to the drying of the plaster in long term<br />

follow-ups. One way to circumvent these difficulties is to calculate the<br />

motionless background picture and analyse images on shorter periods.<br />

But this is very time-consuming and is prone to error when an individual<br />

does not move during this period. The image analysis gives the different<br />

particle positions during the follow-up. The few tiny particles that<br />

may also be <strong>de</strong>tected can be easily discriminated from our collembolan<br />

by setting <strong>for</strong> instance a size threshold in ImageJ be<strong>for</strong>e the analysis.<br />

In figure 4, one can see that the animals first explore relatively exhaustively<br />

the rearing box be<strong>for</strong>e finding refuge in the upper left si<strong>de</strong> of the<br />

box. The method was used to track a single animal, but tracking several<br />

animals at the same time is also possible using the MultiTracker plugin<br />

from ImageJ.


Part II – Chapter 4 173<br />

Figure 4: Image analysis method customised <strong>for</strong> tracking individuals. A. The first<br />

picture of the set shows the starting position of the collembola. B. This picture<br />

shows the still background. C. This picture is obtained from first picture substracted<br />

from the background. D. This picture is the sum of the 300 pictures in the stack<br />

from which the background has been removed. The particle analysis is robust to the<br />

substrate or lighting heterogeneities. E. The successive positions of the individual<br />

are measured by particle analyses.


174 Biodiversity<br />

4.2. Life-history analysis<br />

One of the major advantages of our automated image analysis method is<br />

that it provi<strong>de</strong>s a straight<strong>for</strong>ward estimate of the number and the size of the<br />

particles without altering their shape by smoothing or other image treatments.<br />

We used it as a routine procedure to measure and counts cohorts of<br />

collembolan, but also to get fecundity measurements by isolating the eggs<br />

and then counting the active juveniles once the eggs have hatched. The<br />

method helps characterise life-history traits (Tully and Ferrière, 2008): it<br />

allows measuring growth trajectories and reproductive events <strong>for</strong> instance.<br />

On figure 5, we illustrate some data collected from a cohort of more than<br />

3,500 individuals that has been kept and followed un<strong>de</strong>r controlled conditions<br />

of temperature, food and <strong>de</strong>nsity. The adults were transferred regularly<br />

to fresh rearing boxes and the eggs kept separately until hatching to be<br />

counted. Body length (figure 5B) and fecundity (figure 5C) were measured<br />

using our automatic particle analysis. Although the counting measurements<br />

is pretty accurate (figure 2 and 3), the body length measurements<br />

can be biased when some individuals are curved or are measured in weird<br />

positions. To avoid that, we scored each particle using ratios of its width,<br />

length, perimeter and area (figure 5A). We used this score to select the collembolan<br />

on which a reliable measurement can be ma<strong>de</strong>. This allows us to<br />

reach a precision of about 0.1 to 0.15mm on the mean cohort body length<br />

(figure 5B). These two types of measurements (number and size of particles)<br />

can also be coupled together to follow populations ma<strong>de</strong> of a mixture<br />

of cohorts. The data can be conveniently arranged to draw histograms of<br />

the relative abundance by size class (figure 5D), which allows calculating<br />

the size distribution of the population.<br />

4.3. Population dynamics<br />

Another application of our method is the survey of a population dynamics<br />

by following the population’s size and structure. This was done on a weekly<br />

basis <strong>for</strong> about a year on our collembolan populations. A standard population<br />

survey focuses on counting the number of individuals at each time<br />

step to produce a time series of the population size or <strong>de</strong>nsity. Although<br />

the in<strong>for</strong>mation is incomplete to embrace all the richness of a population<br />

dynamic, it is an essential first step. This kind of in<strong>for</strong>mation is easily<br />

obtained from the results of the automatic particle measuring process by<br />

calculating the average number of particles per date. Figure 6A shows such<br />

a time series. Large fluctuations of the population size can be observed. It<br />

rises from 366 individuals to more than 2000 with no specific temporal<br />

pattern. Rapid increase in the number of individuals can be explained by<br />

the simultaneous hatching of numerous clutches. But it is not possible with<br />

this method to tell if the observed <strong>de</strong>creases are caused by <strong>de</strong>ath of adults or<br />

of juveniles, even though these two mortality processes have very different<br />

meanings regarding the future dynamic of the population.


Part II – Chapter 4 175<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

A<br />

Particle Score<br />

0 7<br />

1 8<br />

2 9<br />

3 10<br />

4 11<br />

5 12<br />

6<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

B<br />

Length (mm)<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

Length (mm)<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />

Width (mm)<br />

Age (days)<br />

50<br />

C<br />

500<br />

D<br />

Pictures<br />

Mean<br />

Fecundity (eggs hatched / individual / week)<br />

20<br />

10<br />

5<br />

2<br />

Number of individuals<br />

200<br />

100<br />

50<br />

20<br />

10<br />

5<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />

Age (days)<br />

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6<br />

Length (mm)<br />

Figure 5: Examples of life-history trait measurements on a cohort of individuals<br />

kept in a constant environment. A. The measurements of about 28,000 50-days old<br />

individuals are scored on their <strong>for</strong>m (width versus length area). This score enables<br />

unreliable results to be removed in or<strong>de</strong>r to reach high precision measurements<br />

of body length in the cohort. b. Growth trajectory of a cohort. A subset of 100<br />

individuals is measured regularly and particles with an unreliable score have<br />

been removed. C. Fecundity measurements (log scale). The adults of the cohort<br />

are regularly transferred to fresh rearing boxes. The eggs laid in the old boxes are<br />

stored in controlled conditions and the juveniles are counted after hatching. Each<br />

blue point is a measure of fecundity based on 10 individuals during one week and<br />

red points are mean values. D. Population structure measured on a collembolan<br />

population (number of individuals on log scale). The population structure was<br />

measured in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ntly on six pictures of the population (grey lines), which<br />

illustrates the good repeatability of our measurement method. The black line<br />

represents the estimated average structure.


176 Biodiversity<br />

Figure 6: Population dynamics of collembolan population assessed by automated<br />

image analysis. A. Time series of the number of individuals in a collembolan<br />

population during about 300 days. The number of individuals is on a log scale.<br />

B. Time series of the measured total biosurface (on a log scale) of the same<br />

population.<br />

Another way to represent the population dynamics is to calculate the<br />

total biosurface rather than the total number of individuals. The biosurface<br />

is the surface occupied by a living individual on a given area,<br />

here the rearing box, and is proportional to the biomass of the population.<br />

Figure 6B displays the time series of the biosurface measured<br />

by summing the surface of all particles at a given date. The observed<br />

biosurface oscillations are smoother than the <strong>de</strong>nsity ones (figure 6).<br />

Biosurface tend to rise throughout the year which suggests that although<br />

individuals are hatching and dying regularly, some juveniles are growing<br />

and reach adulthood, thus increasing the whole population’s<br />

biosurface.<br />

To encompass the richness of <strong>de</strong>tails provi<strong>de</strong>d by our method and to<br />

provi<strong>de</strong> insights into the dynamics of the size structure of the population,<br />

we plotted the population’s size structure during the year (figure<br />

7A). The population size-structure is clearly bimodal with a group<br />

of small and another group of large individuals (figure 5D). At the<br />

beginning of the follow-up, the two groups are close to one another: the<br />

small newly hatched individuals are about 0.2 to 0.3mm long and the<br />

larger individuals (adults) are 0.5 to 1.25mm long. Thereafter, the mean


Part II – Chapter 4 177<br />

length of juveniles remains stable while birth events are clearly visible<br />

as orange and red spots. These birth events correspond to the spikes<br />

in the number of individuals shown in figure 6A and the abrupt drops<br />

following the spikes can now be attributed to events of high newlyhatched<br />

juvenile mortality. The group of larger individuals manage to<br />

grow from about 0.75mm at the beginning of the follow-up to 1.15mm<br />

after 200 days whereas their number remains almost stable. This suggests<br />

that the increasing trend in biosurface (figure 6B) is due to adult<br />

growth rather than recruitment of young individuals into adulthood.<br />

However this does not mean that young individuals do not recruit at all<br />

but either that the time scale of the measure is too large to capture those<br />

recruitment events or that too few individuals are reaching adulthood<br />

simultaneously.<br />

When the population is grown at a lower temperature, the population<br />

dynamic is different (figure 7B): adults reach a much higher size (ca.<br />

1.75mm) and some cohorts of juveniles succeed in recruiting into the<br />

adult population. These waves of recruitment can be clearly seen around<br />

100 days, after 300 days, and be<strong>for</strong>e 400 days. This shows that our measurement<br />

method can be used to analyse the <strong>de</strong>tailed dynamics of population<br />

structures and to extract life-history data from these dynamics<br />

(average size at birth and adult size, maximum body length, average<br />

growth rate, etc.).<br />

5. Conclusion<br />

Our automated particle analysis method was initially <strong>de</strong>signed to count<br />

and measure small moving organisms in experimental microcosms. This<br />

method relies on the i<strong>de</strong>a of analysing pictures of the same sample and<br />

removing the motionless background to count and measure the moving<br />

particles. This method is simple, cheap and efficient and can readily<br />

be ma<strong>de</strong> automatic using the freely available software ImageJ. Although<br />

we have applied the method to experimental collembolan populations<br />

<strong>for</strong> studying movements, life-history traits and population dynamics, it<br />

is clear that this kind of sensor can be adapted to many other experimental<br />

systems and research issues. It is possible to apply more sophisticated<br />

image treatments such as smoothing filters once the background<br />

has been removed in or<strong>de</strong>r to improve the efficiency of particle recognition<br />

especially when some particles are so close that they are in contact<br />

or partially overlaping. Using colour pictures could also brings out<br />

new possibilities to increase the contrasts and discriminate particles of<br />

interest from some background noise (Harman, 2011). In addition, we


178 Biodiversity<br />

Figure 7: Size-structured population dynamics. A. Dynamics of the population<br />

size structure at a given temperature. The colour score scales with the number of<br />

individuals (on a log scale) of a size class at a given time. The number of individuals<br />

can be less than one if an individual is not counted on all of the slices during<br />

the picture analysis. b. Dynamics of the population size structure at another<br />

temperature. Here, we can observe larger adults (more than 1.5mm) and several<br />

waves of birth events followed by recruitment.


Part II – Chapter 4 179<br />

anticipate that several improvements could be implemented such as the<br />

discrimination of several species or types of individuals mixed together<br />

based on shape and colour recognition. In this way, the behaviour of phenotypically<br />

contrasted individuals (with some colour mark <strong>for</strong> instance)<br />

could be followed insi<strong>de</strong> a population and the invasion dynamics of two<br />

competing species or phenotypically different strains could be tracked<br />

down.<br />

Authors’ references<br />

François Mallard, Vincent Le Bourlot, Thomas Tully:<br />

École normale supérieure, Laboratoire Écologie et Évolution, UPMC-<br />

CNRS-ENS UMR 7625, Paris, France<br />

Thomas Tully:<br />

Université Paris 4 – Sorbonne, IUFM <strong>de</strong> Paris, Paris, France<br />

Corresponding author: Thomas Tully, tully@biologie.ens.fr<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

This research was supported by a french grant from the Programme interdisciplinaire<br />

du vivant Longévité et vieillissement fun<strong>de</strong>d by the Centre<br />

National <strong>de</strong> la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS).<br />

References<br />

Abràmoff M. D., Magalhaes P. J., Ram S. J., 2004. Image processing with<br />

ImageJ. Biophotonics International, 11, pp. 36-42.<br />

Auclerc A., Libourel P. A., Salmon S., Bels V., Ponge J. F., 2010. Assessment<br />

of movement patterns in Folsomia candida (hexapoda: Collembola) in the<br />

presence of food. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42, pp. 657-659.<br />

Bell G., Gonzalez A., 2009. Evolutionary rescue can prevent extinction<br />

following environmental change. Ecology Letters, 12, pp. 942-948.<br />

Bell G., Gonzalez A., 2011. Adaptation and evolutionary rescue in metapopulations<br />

experiencing environmental <strong>de</strong>terioration. Science, 332,<br />

pp. 1327-1330.<br />

Benton T. G., Beckerman A. P., 2005. Population dynamics in a noisy world:<br />

lessons from a mite experimental system. Advances in Ecological Research,<br />

37, pp. 143-181.


180 Biodiversity<br />

Benton T. G., Solan M., Travis J. M., Sait S. M., 2007. Microcosm experiments<br />

can in<strong>for</strong>m global ecological problems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution,<br />

22, pp. 516-521.<br />

Bowler D. E., Benton T. G., 2011. Testing the interaction between environmental<br />

variation and dispersal strategy on population dynamics using a soil mite<br />

experimental system. Oecologia, 166, 111-119.<br />

Braendle C., Heyland A., Flatt T., 2011. Integrating mechanistic and<br />

evolutionary analysis of life-history variation, in: Flatt T., Heyland A.<br />

(Eds.), Mechanisms of life-history evolution: The genetics and physiology<br />

of life-history traits and tra<strong>de</strong>-offs. Ox<strong>for</strong>d University Press, Ox<strong>for</strong>d, USA.<br />

Chevin L. M., Lan<strong>de</strong> R., 2010. When do adaptive plasticity and genetic<br />

evolution prevent extinction of a <strong>de</strong>nsity-regulated population? Evolution,<br />

64, pp. 1143-1150.<br />

Coulson T., Benton T. G., Lundberg P., Dall S. R. X., Kendall B. E., Gaillard<br />

J.-M., 2006. Estimating individual contributions to population growth:<br />

evolutionary fitness in ecological time. Proceedings of the Royal Society<br />

of London B, 273, pp. 547-555.<br />

De Roos A. M., 2008. Demographic analysis of continuous-time life-history<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>ls. Ecology Letters, 11, pp. 1-15.<br />

Drake J. M., Griffen B. D., 2009. Speed of expansion and extinction in<br />

experimental populations. Ecology Letters, 12, pp. 772-778.<br />

Drake J. M., Griffen B. D., 2010. Early warning signals of extinction in<br />

<strong>de</strong>teriorating environments. Nature, 467, pp. 456-459.<br />

Drake J. M., Lodge D. M., 2004. Effects of environmental variation on<br />

extinction and establishment. Ecology Letters, 7, pp. 26-30.<br />

Ellers J., Rog S., Braam C., Berg M. P., 2011. Genotypic richness and phenotypic<br />

dissimilarity enhance population per<strong>for</strong>mance. Ecology, 92, 1605-1615<br />

Fesevur, F. Dorgem. [Computer Software] Retrieved from http://dorgem.<br />

source<strong>for</strong>ge.net/<br />

Flatt T., 2005. The evolutionary genetics of canalization. The Quarterly Review<br />

of Biology, 80, pp. 287-316.<br />

Fountain M. T., Hopkin S. P., 2001. Continuous monitoring of Folsomia<br />

candida (insecta: Collembola) in a metal exposure test. Ecotoxicology and<br />

Environmental Safety, 48, pp. 275-286.<br />

Fountain M. T., Hopkin S. P., 2005. Folsomia candida (Collembola): a “standard”<br />

soil arthropod. Annual Review of Entomology, 50, pp. 201-222.<br />

Griffen B. D., Drake J. M., 2008. A review of extinction in experimental<br />

populations. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77, pp. 1274-1287.<br />

Harman J., 2011. Dstretch, A tool <strong>for</strong> the digital enhancement of pictographs<br />

[Computer Software]. Retrieved from http://www.dstretch.com/<br />

Hebert P. D. N., 1978. The population biology of Daphnia (crustacea,<br />

daphnidae). Biological Reviews, 53, pp. 387-426.<br />

Hooper H. L., Connon R., Callaghan A., Maund S. J., Liess M., Duquesne S.,<br />

Hutchinson .H. T., Moggs J., Sibly R. M., 2006. The use of image analysis


Part II – Chapter 4 181<br />

to estimate population growth rate in Daphnia magna. Journal of Applied<br />

Ecology, 43, pp. 828-834.<br />

Krogh P. H., Johansen K., Holmstrup M., 1998. Automatic counting of<br />

collembolans <strong>for</strong> laboratory experiments. Applied Soil Ecology, 7,<br />

pp. 201-205.<br />

Kuhn J., 2001. Multitracker. [Computer Software] Retrieved from http://<br />

rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/plugins/multitracker.html<br />

Leadley P., Pereira H. M., Alkema<strong>de</strong> R., Fernan<strong>de</strong>z-Manjarres J. F., Proença<br />

V., Scharlemann J. P. W., Walpole M. J., 2010. Biodiversity scenarios:<br />

Projections of 21st century change in biodiversity, and associated ecosystem<br />

services. Convention on Biological diversity Technical Series, 50.<br />

Lukas J., Kucerova Z., Stejskal V., 2009. Computer-Based image analysis to<br />

quantify the number of micro-arthropods in a sample. Entomologia<br />

Experimentalis Et Applicata, 132, pp. 289-294.<br />

Marçal, A. R. H., Carida<strong>de</strong> C. M. R., 2006. A system <strong>for</strong> automatic counting<br />

the number of collembola individuals on petri disk images, in Campilho<br />

A., Kamel K. (Eds), Proceedings of the ICIAR 2006. Springer-Verlag,<br />

Berlin, pp. 814-822.<br />

Mueller L. D., Rauser C. L., Rose M. R., 2005. Population dynamics, lifehistory,<br />

and <strong>de</strong>mography: lessons from Drosophila. Advances in Ecological<br />

Research, 37, pp. 77-99.<br />

Ozgul A., Tuljapurkar S., Benton T. G., Pemberton J. M., Clutton-Brock T. H.,<br />

Coulson T., 2009. The dynamics of phenotypic change and the shrinking<br />

sheep of St. Kilda. Science, 325, pp. 464-467.<br />

Pelletier F., Clutton-Brock T. H., Pemberton J. M., Tuljapurkar S., Coulson T.,<br />

2007. The evolutionary <strong>de</strong>mography of ecological change: Linking trait<br />

variation and population growth. Science, 315, pp. 1571-1574.<br />

Pettorelli N., Coulson T., Durant S. M., Gaillard J.-M., 2011. Predation,<br />

individual variability and vertebrate population dynamics. Oecologia, 167,<br />

pp. 305-14.<br />

Pike N., Tully T., Haccou P., Ferrière R., 2004. The effect of autocorrelation<br />

in environmental variability on the persistence of populations: An<br />

experimental test. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 271,<br />

pp. 2143-2148.<br />

Plaistow S. J., Benton T. G., 2009. The influence of context-<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt maternal<br />

effects on population dynamics: An experimental test. Philosophical<br />

Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 364, pp. 1049-1058.<br />

R Development Core Team, 2011. R: A language and environment <strong>for</strong> statistical<br />

computing. R Foundation <strong>for</strong> Statistical Computing Vienna Austria.<br />

Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/<br />

Saccheri I., Hanski I., 2006. Natural selection and population dynamics. Trends<br />

in Ecology and Evolution, 21, pp. 341-347.<br />

Scheiner S. M., 1993. Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annual<br />

Review of Ecology and Systematics, 24, pp. 35-68.


182 Biodiversity<br />

Sinervo B., Men<strong>de</strong>z-<strong>de</strong>-la-Cruz F., Miles D. B., Heulin B., Bastiaans E., Cruz<br />

M. V. S., Lara-Resendiz R., Martinez-Men<strong>de</strong>z N., Cal<strong>de</strong>ron-Espinoza<br />

M. L., Meza-Lazaro R. N., Gads<strong>de</strong>n H., Avila L. J., Morando M., De la<br />

Riva I. J., Sepulveda P. V., Rocha C. F. D., Ibarguengoytia N., Puntriano<br />

C. A., Massot M., Lepetz V., Oksanen T. A., Chapple D. G., Bauer A. M.,<br />

Branch W. R., Clobert J., Sites J. W., 2010. Erosion of lizard diversity by<br />

climate change and altered thermal niches. Science, 328, pp. 894-899.<br />

Tuljapurkar S., Steiner U. K., Orzack S. H., 2009. Dynamic heterogeneity in life<br />

histories. Ecology Letters, 12, pp. 93-106.<br />

Tully T., Ferrière R., 2008. Reproductive flexibility: Genetic variation, genetic<br />

costs and long-term evolution in a collembola. PloS One, 3, e3207.<br />

Tully T., Lambert A., 2011. The evolution of postreproductive life span as an<br />

insurance against in<strong>de</strong>terminacy. Evolution, 65, pp. 3013-3020.


III<br />

EcosySTEM PRoPERTIES


Chapter 1<br />

In situ chemical sensors <strong>for</strong> benthic<br />

marine ecosystem studies<br />

Nadine Le Bris, Leonardo Contreira-Pereira, Mustafa Yücel<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Benthic marine environments concentrate living and non-living entities<br />

that rule major biogeochemical processes such as the remineralisation of<br />

carbon, inorganic carbon fixation by phototrophs or chemoautotrophs,<br />

the recycling of nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur or metals, and the precipitation<br />

and burial of minerals. These processes generate steep physical<br />

and chemical gradients within sedimentary or porous rocky substrates,<br />

as well as in the boundary layer above them. The quantification of the<br />

rates of these trans<strong>for</strong>mations and the resulting fluxes across the benthicpelagic<br />

interface has prompted the <strong>de</strong>velopment of in situ chemical sensors<br />

over the last three <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s. Yet the initial momentum on chemical sensor<br />

application <strong>for</strong> benthic environment came from functional <strong>ecology</strong><br />

studies in naturally “extreme” environments, such as microbial mats in<br />

hypersaline lakes (Jørgensen and Revsbech, 1983) or <strong>de</strong>ep-sea hydrothermal<br />

vents (Johnson et al., 1986; Luther III et al., 2001a). Here, the main<br />

requirement was to assess the distribution of micro- or macro-organisms<br />

in relation to in situ chemical gradients, while minimising disturbance of<br />

these gradients. Some of these tools were later converted to the monitoring<br />

of a variety of marine environments, including environments impacted by<br />

human activities (Moore et al., 2009).<br />

This cross-fertilisation led to the <strong>de</strong>velopment of different techniques<br />

available <strong>for</strong> benthic ecologists. Some of these techniques have been<br />

commercialised (e.g.: Unisense, AIS, SAtlantic) and became accessible to<br />

non-specialised users. However, <strong>de</strong>spite their advantages over sampling<br />

approaches, in situ sensors still remain un<strong>de</strong>r-used. In this chapter, we


186 Ecosystem properties<br />

intend to provi<strong>de</strong> an overview of available sensing techniques and present<br />

their respective advantages <strong>for</strong> various applications in benthic <strong>ecology</strong>.<br />

Existing gaps and promising new technologies are also briefly presented.<br />

Chemical sensors <strong>de</strong>dicated to the monitoring of water masses in coastal<br />

observatories (e.g. Johnson et al., 2007) are out of the scope of this review.<br />

Instead of discussing analytical per<strong>for</strong>mances of sensors per se, which are<br />

<strong>de</strong>tailed in several review papers and books (Taillefert et al., 2000; Buffle<br />

and Horvai, 2000; Moore et al., 2009), we intend to clarify the capabilities<br />

and limitations of these tools <strong>for</strong> the assessment of chemical constraints<br />

on biodiversity. There<strong>for</strong>e, the focus is on the <strong>de</strong>tection or quantification<br />

of chemical compounds and their interaction with biological processes<br />

in the benthic ecosystem, including compounds such as oxygen, carbon<br />

dioxi<strong>de</strong> (CO 2<br />

), hydrogen sulphi<strong>de</strong> (H 2<br />

S), or other biologically relevant<br />

parameters like pH. Quantifying fluxes of nutrients and carbon budgets<br />

in marine environments is often indirectly <strong>de</strong>rived from the measurements<br />

of these compounds. This specific application of sensors was consi<strong>de</strong>red<br />

more broadly in a previous review (Viollier et al., 2003).<br />

2. Why is in situ chemical sensing nee<strong>de</strong>d?<br />

The dynamic mixing zone between sulphi<strong>de</strong>-rich fluids and seawater at<br />

<strong>de</strong>ep-sea hydrothermal vents provi<strong>de</strong>s a striking illustration of the need <strong>for</strong><br />

in situ chemical sensing in marine environment. Using a prototype un<strong>de</strong>rwater<br />

colorimetric chemical analyser, Johnson et al. (1988) first <strong>de</strong>scribed<br />

the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of this particular benthic habitat<br />

where oxygen and sulphi<strong>de</strong> can coexist, whereas they are consi<strong>de</strong>red<br />

as mutually exclusive in most marine environments. Water sampling in<br />

this habitat is unable to preserve the chemical disequilibrium. The relaxation<br />

of chemical systems to more stable thermodynamic states during<br />

sample recovery results in strong biases in the characterisation of habitats<br />

chemistry (Le Bris et al., 2006). Such sampling biases are not restricted<br />

to <strong>de</strong>ep-sea hydrothermal vents, but can occur wherever local hydrodynamics<br />

promotes diffusive or advective transport of reduced compounds<br />

into oxygenated water, creating chemically unstable conditions. These<br />

metastable chemical conditions, which are supporting chemosynthetic<br />

metabolic pathways <strong>for</strong> microbial communities, can only be accurately<br />

characterised by using in situ sensors (e.g. Laurent et al., 2009; Vopel et<br />

al., 2005).<br />

On the other hand, it is generally assumed that pore water chemical gradients<br />

that are governed by slow molecular diffusion rates are stable in<br />

sediment cores. Most of the time, these profiles are there<strong>for</strong>e measured<br />

on cores, shortly after sampling. Cores are sometimes maintained un<strong>de</strong>r


Part III – Chapter 1 187<br />

controlled temperature, close to in situ conditions, in or<strong>de</strong>r to minimise<br />

changes. Despite this, differences between in situ and laboratory pore water<br />

chemical profiles from sediment cores were highlighted, which illustrated<br />

the sensitivity of these profiles to sampling conditions and encouraged<br />

direct in situ sensing approaches (Preisler et al., 2007). The risk of disturbance<br />

is obviously more critical when the sample un<strong>de</strong>rgoes large pressure<br />

and temperature changes. Sediment cores collected in <strong>de</strong>ep-sea environments,<br />

in which dissolved gases (e.g. CO 2<br />

, methane) can be enriched, are<br />

subject to <strong>de</strong>gassing during recovery, affecting chemical profiles and leading<br />

to significant biases (De Beer et al., 2006).<br />

In addition, one of the main advantages of in situ sensing relative to direct<br />

sampling is to provi<strong>de</strong> a better view of temporal and spatial variability<br />

from larger data sets. This is particularly crucial in extreme and remote<br />

environments where sampling is difficult and time-constrained. The capacity<br />

to monitor environmental fluctuations also provi<strong>de</strong>s a much more relevant<br />

view of the chemical constraints exerted on communities and on<br />

the processes ruling these fluctuations (III, 2). For all these reasons, studies<br />

of <strong>de</strong>ep-sea benthic ecosystems have ma<strong>de</strong> important contributions to<br />

metho dological advances in sensors and analysers (figure 1). As reviewed<br />

in Moore et al. (2009), many of the technologies and analytical principles<br />

available to date <strong>for</strong> coastal monitoring and shallow water studies<br />

(e.g. colorimetric analysers or micro-profilers) originated from early prototypes<br />

<strong>de</strong>veloped <strong>for</strong> extreme and remote environments. Nowadays, the<br />

need is expanding to polar and sub-seafloor environments, bringing new<br />

constraints on the use of in situ sensors and supporting new <strong>de</strong>velopments.<br />

Figure 1: Examples of <strong>de</strong>ep-sea chemical sensing <strong>de</strong>vices. A. Microprofiler <strong>for</strong> highresolution<br />

sediment oxygen, pH, T and sulfi<strong>de</strong> profiles at a methane seepage area<br />

(© Ifremer/ MEDECO-cruise, F. Wenzhöfer). B. Electrochemical probe integrating<br />

both pH and H2S and temperature sensors in the mixing plume of ‘CrabSpa’, a<br />

diffuse of hydrothermal vent on the top of a lava pillar 2500m <strong>de</strong>ep, colonized by<br />

bacterial mats and Bythogreid crabs (© WHOI /S. Sievert). These extreme benthic<br />

environments have contributed importantly to technological advances in the field<br />

of benthic chemical sensors.


188 Ecosystem properties<br />

3. A variety of techniques with different capabilities<br />

3.1. Spectrophotometric flow analyzers<br />

Continuous-flow analysis (CFA) and flow-injection-analysis (FIA) <strong>de</strong>vices<br />

are routinely used in laboratory to analyse large series of aquatic samples,<br />

and have been adapted <strong>for</strong> use on various oceanographic plat<strong>for</strong>ms,<br />

including lan<strong>de</strong>rs and submersibles operating on the seafloor. The <strong>de</strong>tection<br />

principle is usually based on spectrophotometric and fluorimetric<br />

methods after mixing with reagents or dyes (table 1). For hydrothermal<br />

habitat studies, the first in situ measurements of sulphi<strong>de</strong> were obtained at<br />

2500m <strong>de</strong>ep from a submersible <strong>de</strong>vice based on the Cline colorimetric<br />

method (Johnson et al., 1986). In these chemically diverse environments,<br />

multichannel instruments ma<strong>de</strong> it possible to per<strong>for</strong>m sulphi<strong>de</strong> analysis<br />

in combination with silicate (Johnson et al., 1994; Le Bris et al., 2000),<br />

nitrate (Le Bris et al., 2000), iron (Chapin et al., 2002; Sarradin et al.,<br />

2005) and manganese (Sarrazin et al., 1999).<br />

The main advantage of these methods is the possibility of in situ calibration<br />

using standards (Le Bris et al., 2000). In<strong>de</strong>ed, chemical methods require<br />

repeated calibration, as close as possible to measurement conditions, in or<strong>de</strong>r<br />

to correct drifts and account <strong>for</strong> interference effects. In an attempt to avoid<br />

the use of reagents and standards, an UV spectrophotometry method based<br />

on the <strong>de</strong>convolution of complex spectra reflecting the mixture of several<br />

absorbing species (e.g. nitrate, sulphi<strong>de</strong>, iodine) was suggested (Johnson and<br />

Coletti, 2002). However, although the UV nitrate sensor ISUS is now commercially<br />

available and has achieved a certain level of success in the field of<br />

coastal monitoring, the use of this <strong>de</strong>vice <strong>for</strong> benthic ecosystem studies has<br />

not yet been reported. A number of studies confirmed the per<strong>for</strong>mances<br />

of flow <strong>de</strong>vices <strong>for</strong> the mapping of steep mixing fluid-seawater interfaces<br />

above the seafloor (Johnson et al., 1988; 1994; Sarrazin et al., 1999; Le bris<br />

et al., 2000; 2006). New generation <strong>de</strong>vices were built using miniaturised<br />

flow actuators solenoid valves and optimised <strong>for</strong> application in environmental<br />

monitoring (e.g. Johnson et al., 2007; Vuillemin et al., 2009).<br />

Flow-measurement methods using a colorimetric or fluorescent dye that<br />

acts as a pH indicator have been successfully implemented from ships<br />

and buoys to investigate the CO 2<br />

-carbonate system at the air-sea interface<br />

(Feely et al., 1998). The transfer of such techniques to pH, DIC, alkalinity<br />

and pCO 2<br />

measurement in benthic systems has not yet been achieved.<br />

For applications at the interface between the seafloor and the water column,<br />

other techniques are being preferred. In<strong>de</strong>ed, in flow analysis, the<br />

risk of clogging is large when transferring the sample across the reaction<br />

pathway to the <strong>de</strong>tection cell. This restricts its use to the aqueous phase<br />

only, excluding environments with high particle load or colloids, and the<br />

application of flow analysis in close vicinity to animals or bacterial mats is<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e <strong>de</strong>licate. For this reason and <strong>de</strong>spite the wi<strong>de</strong> range of methods


Part III – Chapter 1 189<br />

available, the use of flow analysers in benthic environments remained<br />

limited. If the chemical parameter to be measured can be converted into<br />

a physical (electrical or optical) signal, electro<strong>de</strong>s or opto<strong>de</strong>s provi<strong>de</strong> a<br />

more a<strong>de</strong>quate solution, circumventing the problem of sample drawing by<br />

<strong>de</strong>porting the measurement point to the environment itself (see below).<br />

Table 1: Summary of the sensing techniques used in benthic environments,<br />

their respective advantages and drawbacks.<br />

Group of<br />

sensors<br />

Flow analyzers<br />

Johnson et al,<br />

1986, Le Bris<br />

et al 2000,<br />

Vuillemin et<br />

al. 2009<br />

Single analyte<br />

electrochemical<br />

sensors<br />

Revsbech et al<br />

1983, De Beer<br />

2002, Cai and<br />

Reimers 2003,<br />

Le Bris et al.<br />

2001<br />

Multi-analyte<br />

electrochemical<br />

sensors<br />

Luther et al<br />

1999, Buffle<br />

and Tercier<br />

2000<br />

Opto<strong>de</strong>s<br />

Glud et al<br />

2003, Konig et<br />

al 2005<br />

New spectrometry<br />

methods.<br />

Wankel et al<br />

2010<br />

Operating<br />

Principle<br />

Spectrophotometry<br />

and<br />

micro-flow<br />

techniques<br />

after mixing<br />

the sample with<br />

reagents/dyes<br />

Potentiometry<br />

and<br />

amperometry<br />

with selective<br />

membrane<br />

electro<strong>de</strong>s<br />

Voltammetry,<br />

working<br />

electro<strong>de</strong><br />

surface<br />

generally<br />

modified (e.g.<br />

gold amalgam<br />

electro<strong>de</strong>)<br />

Measurement<br />

of fluorescence<br />

intensity and<br />

lifetime of a dye<br />

sensitive to the<br />

parameter to be<br />

measured<br />

Raman<br />

and mass<br />

spectrometry<br />

Available chemical<br />

species in marine<br />

environments<br />

S(-II), NO 2-<br />

+NO 3-<br />

,<br />

silicates, Fe(II),<br />

Mn(II),<br />

DIC, alkalinity, pH<br />

pH, Ca 2+ , CO 2<br />

, H 2<br />

S,<br />

S 2- , N 2<br />

O, O 2<br />

, H 2<br />

O 2<br />

, H 2<br />

S, S x<br />

2-<br />

, Fe(II),<br />

Mn(II), S 2<br />

O 3<br />

2-<br />

Cu(II), Pb(II), Zn(II),<br />

Cd(II)<br />

O 2<br />

, pH<br />

CH 4<br />

, H 2<br />

S, H 2,<br />

pCO 2<br />

organics<br />

Benthic use<br />

Mixing zone<br />

above the<br />

seafloor at<br />

hydrothermal<br />

vents<br />

Only in the<br />

water column<br />

From shallow to<br />

<strong>de</strong>ep sediments;<br />

including<br />

hydrothermal<br />

vents and<br />

methane seeps.<br />

Interfaces<br />

between<br />

organisms and<br />

the environment<br />

Vent habitats,<br />

sediments,<br />

Metal-rich<br />

coastal waters<br />

Methane<br />

seeps, shallow<br />

and <strong>de</strong>ep-sea<br />

sediments<br />

Deep-sea<br />

hydrothermal<br />

vents and<br />

methane seeps<br />

Key Advantages<br />

/ Limitation<br />

In situ calibration,<br />

high precision,<br />

wi<strong>de</strong> range<br />

of analytes /<br />

sensitivity to<br />

clogging, not<br />

selective to<br />

chemical speciation<br />

High spatial<br />

resolution, low<br />

energy use /<br />

long-term drifts,<br />

microsensor<br />

fragility<br />

Access to chemical<br />

speciation / long<br />

term instability,<br />

sensitivity<br />

to electro<strong>de</strong><br />

poisoning<br />

No analyte<br />

consumption,<br />

2D mapping /<br />

<strong>de</strong>crease sensitivity<br />

over time, high<br />

<strong>de</strong>tection limit<br />

and low precision<br />

Detection of new<br />

analytes / cost,<br />

limited to aquatic<br />

media<br />

The list of tools and associated references are not exhaustive. The cited advantages and limitations<br />

are within the context of this review article.


190 Ecosystem properties<br />

3.2 Single-parameter potentiometric sensors<br />

The simplest electrochemical technique, potentiometry, uses the potential<br />

difference between a reference electro<strong>de</strong> and an ion sensitive electro<strong>de</strong><br />

(ISE). The logarithmic relationship between the potential and the concentration<br />

(or activity) of the <strong>de</strong>tected ion by the ISE is referred as the Nernst<br />

law. The pH glass electro<strong>de</strong> is by far the most wi<strong>de</strong>ly used potentiometric<br />

sensor in benthic environments. Potentiometric pH measurements were<br />

obtained from the shallowest to the <strong>de</strong>epest environments, both insi<strong>de</strong><br />

the sediment (Wenzhöfer et al., 2000; De beer et al., 2006; Reimers,<br />

2007) and above it, in the acidic plume of hydrothermal vents (Le Bris<br />

et al., 2001), within the tube of an extremophilic polychaete worm living<br />

on the wall of hydrothermal chimneys (Le Bris et al. 2003, see figure 2),<br />

or on the surface of <strong>de</strong>grading organic falls (Laurent et al., 2009). The<br />

low sensitivity of miniaturized pH electro<strong>de</strong>s to pressure is an advantage<br />

to work at various <strong>de</strong>pths (up to at least 3000m <strong>de</strong>ep), but temperature<br />

effects are larger and should be accounted <strong>for</strong> (Le bris et al., 2001). A wi<strong>de</strong><br />

range of analytes can be similarly measured by potentiometry based on<br />

ion-specific membranes although only a few were used in situ (De Beer,<br />

2002). The Ca 2+ sensor, which was used to assess saturation thresholds <strong>for</strong><br />

calcification is of particular interest (Cai and Reimers, 2003). pCO 2<br />

was<br />

also quantified by a glass sensor covered with a gas permeable membrane<br />

(the so-called Severinghaus sensor), in combination with pH (Cai and<br />

Reimers, 2000; Al-Horani et al., 2003).<br />

Figure 2: Measurement of pH insi<strong>de</strong> the tube of an Alvinella pompejana hydrothermal<br />

worm tube. The diameter of the pH glass electro<strong>de</strong> is 2mm. It is combined with a<br />

temperature sensor and a fluid flow sampler inlet (red arrow).


Part III – Chapter 1 191<br />

The sulphi<strong>de</strong> potentiometric sensor is the most wi<strong>de</strong>ly used and best studied<br />

of these sensors. A potentiometric sulphi<strong>de</strong> sensor based on a silver<br />

wire coated with silver sulphi<strong>de</strong> was first suggested by Berner (1963). It<br />

was later miniaturised by Revsbech et al. (1983) who were the first to<br />

study sediment profiles with a potentiometric sulphi<strong>de</strong> microelectro<strong>de</strong><br />

of 200µm tip diameter, enhancing spatial resolution and reducing disturbance<br />

on in situ gradients. From this, the use of electrochemical techniques<br />

<strong>de</strong>veloped rapidly, because of their capacity to achieve the spatial<br />

resolution required <strong>for</strong> biogeochemical studies within microbial mats and<br />

sediments (Taillefert et al., 2000; De Beer, 2002 <strong>for</strong> review). Asi<strong>de</strong> from<br />

the capacity to be miniaturised, potentiometric sulphi<strong>de</strong> electro<strong>de</strong>s have<br />

several advantages <strong>for</strong> benthic <strong>ecology</strong> studies, such as relatively low sensitivity<br />

to temperature and pressure and large <strong>de</strong>tection range (e.g. from<br />

less than 1µM to more than 1mM <strong>for</strong> sulphi<strong>de</strong>, Vismann et al., 1996). At<br />

higher concentrations, they suffer from low accuracy due to their logarithmic<br />

response, but these electro<strong>de</strong>s still respond reproducibly to sulphi<strong>de</strong><br />

at least up to 20mM. Conversely, <strong>de</strong>viations from the Nernst law and long<br />

response times can affect the in situ per<strong>for</strong>mance of the potentiometric<br />

sulphi<strong>de</strong> electro<strong>de</strong>s at low sulphi<strong>de</strong> levels (Müller and Stierli, 1999; Ye<br />

et al., 2008). To solve this problem, these authors proposed epoxy-based<br />

silver sulphi<strong>de</strong> sensors with a much larger nernstian measurement range,<br />

but the in situ per<strong>for</strong>mances of these sensors are not known.<br />

A main difficulty arising from the use of potentiometric sensors comes<br />

from potential drifts, which result from the fact that sensors can only be<br />

calibrated in laboratory conditions be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>de</strong>ployment. Drift may occur<br />

when the reactive surfaces of the reference and sensing electro<strong>de</strong>s un<strong>de</strong>rgo<br />

fouling by bacterial biofilms or by adsorption of mineral and organic<br />

colloids. The conversion of the AgCl surface of the reference electro<strong>de</strong><br />

to silver sulphi<strong>de</strong> upon exposure to H 2<br />

S, or the ageing of the crystalline<br />

layer of the sensing surface are also i<strong>de</strong>ntified as possible causes of<br />

drift (Janz and Ives, 1968). Furthermore, since Ag/Ag 2<br />

S electro<strong>de</strong>s are<br />

sensitive to S 2- , pH measurements need to be per<strong>for</strong>med along with in<br />

situ <strong>de</strong>ployments, raising similar constraints with pH electro<strong>de</strong> responses.<br />

Ecological studies, however, do not always require highly accurate chemical<br />

data, and the temporal and spatial variability of analytes, in a semiquantitative<br />

approach, may be more in<strong>for</strong>mative than few quantitative<br />

values to elucidate the dynamics of natural systems (Le Bris et al., 2008).<br />

However, when quantitative assessment of fluxes at the sediment water<br />

interface is required, potentiometric sensors are often replaced by other<br />

techniques.


192 Ecosystem properties<br />

3.3 Single-parameter electrochemical sensors by amperometry<br />

Amperometry is one of the most used techniques <strong>for</strong> microsensors nowadays<br />

(table 1). Amperometric microsensors measure the current generated<br />

at the surface of a working electro<strong>de</strong> to which a fixed difference of potential<br />

is applied according to a reference electro<strong>de</strong>. In the so-called Clark<br />

sensor <strong>for</strong> oxygen, the applied potential enables the reduction of oxygen<br />

at the working electro<strong>de</strong> ma<strong>de</strong> of gold or platinum. A gas-permeable membrane<br />

prevents other potential oxidants from reacting on the electro<strong>de</strong>,<br />

while maintaining a fixed pH and ionic strength at the electro<strong>de</strong> surface.<br />

Un<strong>de</strong>r these conditions, the measured current is proportional to the rate<br />

of the reaction, controlled by the flux of oxygen passing the membrane,<br />

and ultimately the concentration of oxygen in the medium. Revsbech<br />

(1989) presented an oxygen microsensor built on the principle of the Clark<br />

electro<strong>de</strong>. The addition of a third electro<strong>de</strong>, the guard catho<strong>de</strong>, enabled<br />

the improvement of the accuracy, the response time and the stability of<br />

measurements, by preserving the miniaturised reference electro<strong>de</strong> from<br />

reduction or oxidation currents. On the same principle, an amperometric<br />

microsensor was <strong>de</strong>veloped to measure H 2<br />

S (Jeroschewski et al., 1996).<br />

This sensor was used in a wi<strong>de</strong> range of sulphidic environments such as<br />

coastal sediments (Kühl et al., 1998), hypersaline lakes (Wieland and<br />

Kühl, 2000), shallow water hydrothermal vents systems (Wenzhöfer et<br />

al., 2000) and <strong>de</strong>ep-sea methane seeps (De Beer et al., 2006). The H 2<br />

S<br />

microsensor is sensitive to temperature and salinity changes, but unlike<br />

the potentiometric sensor, its response is linearly related to the concentration<br />

of H 2<br />

S (Jeroschewski et al., 1996). For this reason, amperometric sensors<br />

are particularly useful un<strong>de</strong>r acidic conditions where the H 2<br />

S <strong>for</strong>m of<br />

free sulphi<strong>de</strong> is dominant. It can also be utilised un<strong>de</strong>r mo<strong>de</strong>rate alkaline<br />

conditions (pH< 8.5), but when pH increases, the proportion of H 2<br />

S over<br />

HS - <strong>de</strong>creases to such an extent that it becomes more advantageous to use<br />

the potentiometric sulphi<strong>de</strong> ISE method (Taillefert et al., 2000).<br />

Amperometric microsensors were ma<strong>de</strong> commercially available to a wi<strong>de</strong><br />

range of users by the group that <strong>de</strong>signed them at the Aarhus University,<br />

Denmark (Unisense, http://www.unisense.dk). Amperometic sensors<br />

are also available <strong>for</strong> hydrogen, hydrogen sulphi<strong>de</strong> and N 2<br />

O resulting of<br />

nitrate reduction by microbes. For sediments, a new bio-electrochemical<br />

sensor has been <strong>de</strong>signed, which combines an amperometric N 2<br />

O sensor<br />

and a microbial community that converts nitrate into this compound<br />

(Larsen et al., 1996).<br />

Despite the success of these microsensors, an important limitation should<br />

be kept in mind: the fragility of the glass tip usually less than 100µm<br />

makes the acquisition of profiles over 10 cm or more extremely difficult<br />

in sediments inhabited by macrofauna <strong>for</strong>ming carbonate shells or chi-


Part III – Chapter 1 193<br />

tin tubes (De Beer et al., 2006). The pressure sensitivity of amperometric<br />

sensors is also much higher than those potentiometric sensors, since<br />

the measurement is related to the partial pressure of a volatile compound<br />

(Glud et al., 2003). Strong temperature variations also influence the permeability<br />

of the membrane and have to be corrected (Wenzhöfer et al.,<br />

2000). Drift and limited lifetime is another limitation of amperometric<br />

sensors. Particularly, electrochemical reactions occurring at the electro<strong>de</strong>s<br />

results in changes in the chemical composition of the internal electrolyte.<br />

The <strong>de</strong>gree of this change <strong>de</strong>pends on the current intensity and on the<br />

electrolyte volume. Such changes are particularly significant in the case<br />

of microsensors, due to their very small size, and can cause signal drift<br />

and limit the operational lifetime. For example, reduction of sensitivity<br />

has been reported after a prolonged use of the H 2<br />

S sensor (Jeroschewski<br />

et al., 1996), and the lifetime of the commercial sensor is consi<strong>de</strong>red to be<br />

limited to several months<br />

3.4 Multiparameter voltammetric techniques<br />

Compared to potentiometry and amperometry, voltammetric techniques<br />

are attractive <strong>for</strong> benthic studies because they can <strong>de</strong>tect several analytes<br />

with the same electro<strong>de</strong> and have fast response times (less than 10sec),<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e avoiding problems due to the use of multiple electro<strong>de</strong>s in<br />

spatially or temporally heterogeneous environments (Wang et al., 1998;<br />

Luther III et al., 1999; 2001b). In voltammetry, a variable potential is<br />

applied between a working electro<strong>de</strong> and a reference electro<strong>de</strong>. In cyclic<br />

voltammetry, the most in situ used method, this potential is swept from a<br />

minimum to a maximum value, and reverse. At an appropriate potential,<br />

an analyte is oxidized or reduced at the working electro<strong>de</strong> resulting in a<br />

current peak recor<strong>de</strong>d on a so-called voltammogram (see figure 3 <strong>for</strong> an<br />

example). Reviews of the voltammetric techniques inclu<strong>de</strong> those by Tercier<br />

and Buffle (1993) and Luther III et al. (2008). Like in amperometry, the<br />

current is measured between the working electro<strong>de</strong> and an auxiliary (or<br />

guard) electro<strong>de</strong>. By using an un<strong>de</strong>rwater voltammetric <strong>de</strong>vice, Luther III<br />

et al. (2001a) investigated sulphi<strong>de</strong> speciation (i.e. different electroactive<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms of sulphur(-II)) down to 2500m <strong>de</strong>ep and temperature up to 80°C,<br />

and emphasised significant differences in the chemical environment of<br />

hydrothermal fauna. The working electro<strong>de</strong> used by these authors was<br />

ma<strong>de</strong> of a mercury film <strong>for</strong>med on a gold disc (diameter 100 µm). One of<br />

the main advantages of this gold amalgam electro<strong>de</strong> lies in its high overpotential<br />

<strong>for</strong> the reduction of water, expanding the range of analytes that<br />

can be measured (Kühl and Steuckart, 2000). Concentrations of thiosulfate,<br />

polysulphi<strong>de</strong>s and iron(II, III) and manganese(II), oxygen and iodine<br />

were also obtained with the use of voltammetric methods (Luther III et


194 Ecosystem properties<br />

al., 2001b; 2008). For sulphi<strong>de</strong> measurements, solid electro<strong>de</strong>s such as Pt,<br />

Au, Ag and various types of carbon substrates were also used without Hg<br />

film (review in Buffle and Tercier-Weber, 2005) and have the advantage<br />

of simplicity and ruggedness although their analytical per<strong>for</strong>mances are<br />

more limited.<br />

Figure 3: A typical voltammogram obtained using a solid state gold-amalgam<br />

microelectro<strong>de</strong> (100µm tip diameter) maintained in a hole insi<strong>de</strong> a <strong>de</strong>grading woody<br />

substrate in seawater. The figure illustrates the oxidation (positive) and reduction<br />

(negative) currents recor<strong>de</strong>d while the potential is scanned from -0.1 V to -1.8 V<br />

and back at a rate of 1V/s (cyclic voltammetry). The height of the negative current<br />

intensity peak is proportional to the concentration of sulphi<strong>de</strong> (about 440µM here)<br />

after several weeks of immersion of the wood in a seawater aquarium.<br />

Several metals like manganese, copper, silver, mercury, arsenic, and other<br />

toxic metals can be measured in laboratory by using voltammetric techniques.<br />

An automated flow-through <strong>de</strong>vice has been <strong>de</strong>signed <strong>for</strong> monitoring<br />

of Mn, Cu, Pb and Cd in natural waters (buffle and Tercier-Waeber,<br />

2000). However, since the methods usually require pH buffering, their in<br />

situ use <strong>for</strong> benthic ecosystem studies is not straight<strong>for</strong>ward, <strong>de</strong>spite their<br />

interest <strong>for</strong> the study of contaminated sediments. The recent <strong>de</strong>velopment<br />

of nanomaterials is one of the promising ways to <strong>de</strong>velop new electrochemical<br />

and optical sensors, especially <strong>for</strong> organic molecules that require<br />

higher oxidation potential. For example, the simultaneous <strong>de</strong>tection of<br />

inorganic sulphi<strong>de</strong> and organic sulphi<strong>de</strong> species in a single voltammetric<br />

scan may be possible with carbon nanotubes. This electro<strong>de</strong> enables H 2<br />

S<br />

and thiols signals to be discriminated, while they overlap on other electro<strong>de</strong><br />

materials like gold-amalgam <strong>for</strong> example (Lawrence et al., 2004a;<br />

2004b).


Part III – Chapter 1 195<br />

3.5 Opto<strong>de</strong>s<br />

Opto<strong>de</strong>s are based on the measurement of fluorescence intensity or lifetime<br />

of a dye that is modulated by a chemical substance to be measured.<br />

This fluorescent molecule is embed<strong>de</strong>d in a polymeric membrane integrated<br />

in an optical measurement system able to induce (using a pulsed<br />

UV light source) and to quantify (using a CCD camera or a <strong>de</strong>tector with<br />

high temporal resolution) the fluorescent signal (Klimant et al., 1995;<br />

Glud et al., 1996; 2003). The first oxygen opto<strong>de</strong>s were <strong>de</strong>veloped with the<br />

ruthenium(II)-tris-(4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenantrolin) complex, which fluorescence<br />

is quenched by oxygen favouring the relaxation of the excited<br />

<strong>for</strong>m, but similar dyes are now available providing a higher resolution<br />

(König et al., 2005). Other fluorescent pH indicators are used <strong>for</strong> pH<br />

measurements (Stahl et al., 2006).<br />

One of the main limitations of opto<strong>de</strong>s is the progressive <strong>de</strong>gradation<br />

of the dye while exposed to the excitation light (Glud et al. 2003). To<br />

improve accuracy, the fluorescent lifetime, in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt of the dye concentration<br />

in the matrix, is generally used instead of the intensity signal.<br />

Fibre optics allowed microopto<strong>de</strong>s to be <strong>de</strong>signed with advantages <strong>for</strong><br />

high-resolution profiles similar to those achieved with microelectro<strong>de</strong><br />

(Glud et al., 1999). The main advantage of opto<strong>de</strong>s, over amperometric<br />

electro<strong>de</strong>s, is that they do not consume the analyte. As a result the size of<br />

the opto<strong>de</strong> is not limited and planar opto<strong>de</strong>s of several square centimetres<br />

were <strong>de</strong>veloped <strong>for</strong> an implementation in aquaria (Glud et al., 1996;<br />

Stahl et al., 2006) and recently <strong>for</strong> in situ measurements down to great<br />

<strong>de</strong>pth (Glud et al., 2005). However, the time response of these planar<br />

opto<strong>de</strong>s is in the range of minutes, much longer than the fast-responding<br />

microopto<strong>de</strong>s.<br />

3.6 New in situ techniques<br />

Advanced analytical techniques are <strong>de</strong>veloping rapidly <strong>for</strong> in situ marine<br />

applications (Moore et al., 2009 <strong>for</strong> review). The adaptation <strong>for</strong> un<strong>de</strong>rwater<br />

use of a new set of spectrometric methods, such as Raman spectroscopy<br />

(Brewer et al., 2004), surface plasmon resonance (SPR, Boulart et al.,<br />

2008) or membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS, Schluter and Gentz,<br />

2008; Wankel et al., 2010) further expan<strong>de</strong>d the potential of in situ <strong>de</strong>tection<br />

of less reactive chemical compounds such as methane, hydrocarbons,<br />

or organic pollutants. Their adaptation to various immersion <strong>de</strong>pths will<br />

provi<strong>de</strong> a better view of the fine-scale gradients of these compounds at<br />

the scale of patchy macrophyte and macrofauna aggregations on the seafloor.<br />

The technique has been used recently from remote operated vehicles<br />

(ROVs) <strong>for</strong> the measurement of a variety of analytes on the seafloor,


196 Ecosystem properties<br />

ranging from simple volatiles like H 2<br />

S, CO 2<br />

and methane down to 2500m<br />

(Wankel et al., 2010).<br />

These new techniques also hold the promise of disentangling dissolved<br />

organic carbon complexity directly in situ with spatial resolution similar<br />

to inorganic compounds profiles. While amino acids, sugars, volatile<br />

organic acids are commonly measured in laboratory, there are still no<br />

tools to access these biochemical tracers directly in situ. <strong>Sensors</strong> should<br />

also target organic pollutants or signaling molecules that are likely to<br />

play a significant role in marine benthic ecosystems at low concentration<br />

levels, but very low <strong>de</strong>tection thresholds are a major challenge and<br />

will likely require highly selective biosensing techniques to be <strong>de</strong>veloped.<br />

Carbon nanotube-based biosensors <strong>de</strong>veloped <strong>for</strong> other purposes could<br />

be adapted to <strong>de</strong>scribe benthic marine ecosystems (see the review by<br />

Merkoci, 2006). Current sensors are however also lacking a number of<br />

ecologically important inorganic components, the major one being sulphate,<br />

which is a main electron acceptor <strong>for</strong> organic matter <strong>de</strong>gradation<br />

in anoxic environment.<br />

4. Per<strong>for</strong>mances of in situ chemical sensing techniques<br />

<strong>for</strong> benthic studies<br />

4.1. Measurement ranges<br />

The tools mentionned previously were generally <strong>de</strong>veloped <strong>for</strong> a given<br />

application, i.e. tightly linked to the ecological issue that was addressed.<br />

Their application to different contexts may suffer from significant limitations.<br />

For instance, while amperometric sensors are selective to H 2<br />

S,<br />

less than 90% of the free sulphi<strong>de</strong> is present un<strong>de</strong>r this acidic <strong>for</strong>m<br />

in typical seawater and most pore waters of the benthic environment,<br />

where pH is above 7.5. De Beer et al. (2006) reported that the <strong>de</strong>tection<br />

limit of this microsensor is about 10µM sulphi<strong>de</strong> at pH 8. In such conditions,<br />

the sensitivity of this sensor is there<strong>for</strong>e insufficient to <strong>de</strong>tect<br />

significant exposure to this toxic compound, consi<strong>de</strong>ring that a few<br />

micromolar is already <strong>de</strong>leterious <strong>for</strong> marine aerobes (Vismann et al.,<br />

1991). Potentiometry is better adapted to characterise the potential toxicity<br />

of low sulphi<strong>de</strong> content in the environment. Conversely, voltammetry<br />

offers a much lower <strong>de</strong>tection limit (0.2µM according to Luther<br />

III et al., 2008) but also accounts <strong>for</strong> the less toxic ionic fraction, HS - .<br />

Assessing the toxicity of the environment required pH to be measured<br />

in parallel, in or<strong>de</strong>r to assess the ratio of H 2<br />

S and HS - in the total concentration<br />

of free sulphi<strong>de</strong>.


Part III – Chapter 1 197<br />

A similar issue was raised about oxygen. Amperometric microsensors<br />

were first <strong>de</strong>veloped to <strong>de</strong>scribe oxygen sediment profiles from which the<br />

consumption of oxygen in sediment can be quantified (Revsbech et al.,<br />

1983). These microsensors use the Clark amperometric electro<strong>de</strong> principle<br />

and have a <strong>de</strong>tection limit estimated to be 1µM. While this is suitable to<br />

quantify oxygen consumption rates, this <strong>de</strong>tection limit is insufficient to<br />

establish true anoxic conditions in which anaerobic ammonium oxidation<br />

or another strict anaerobic microbial processes could occur. This limit led<br />

to the <strong>de</strong>velopment and commercialisation of a new tool, the STOx sensor<br />

with enhanced sensitivity. The <strong>de</strong>tection limit of this sensor is much<br />

lower (0.01µM, www.unisense.com). In comparison, the other methods<br />

used to <strong>de</strong>tect oxygen in sediment or overlying water have a much higher<br />

<strong>de</strong>tection threshold: 10µM <strong>for</strong> voltammetry and 7µM <strong>for</strong> opto<strong>de</strong>s (Moore<br />

et al., 2009).<br />

Conversely, the application range of a chemical sensor may be limited by<br />

its saturation threshold. For in situ colorimetric sulphi<strong>de</strong> analysers, the<br />

maximum concentration lies around 200µM (Sarrazin et al., 1999) and<br />

was exten<strong>de</strong>d to about 1mM using a non linear calibration method (Le<br />

Bris et al., 2003). Similarly, amperometric sulphi<strong>de</strong> sensors are expected<br />

to have a maximum concentration range of 200µM <strong>for</strong> H 2<br />

S (Borum<br />

et al., 2005), expanding its limit to a few millimolar of free sulfi<strong>de</strong> in<br />

alkaline conditions. This is important to be acknowledged given that the<br />

concentration of sulphi<strong>de</strong> often exceeds 1mM in organic rich sediments.<br />

Potentiometric sensors with logarithmic response are sensitive over a<br />

much larger measurement range, although their precision is limited at<br />

high concentration.<br />

4.2 Temperature <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce and other interferences<br />

For the purpose of habitat comparison or rate quantification, chemical<br />

concentrations may require to be quantified with maximum accuracy.<br />

In this case, besi<strong>de</strong> the classical issues of sensitivity and reproducibility,<br />

measurement conditions are to be accounted in the choice of the sensor.<br />

When temperature is prone to change, which is often the case in natural<br />

environments, the temperature influence on the sensor response is<br />

an important criterium. Colorimetric <strong>de</strong>tection methods are sensitive to<br />

temperature (and pressure) changes due to their influence on flow rates<br />

and reaction kinetics (Le Bris et al., 2000). In comparison, electrochemical<br />

techniques with solid state electro<strong>de</strong> are less affected by temperature<br />

change, unless a selective membrane is used. Diffusion through a<br />

membrane is highly <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt on temperature, and correction is nee<strong>de</strong>d<br />

while using amperometric microsensors in thermally variable environments<br />

(Wenzhöfer et al., 2000). Glass electro<strong>de</strong>s also display a signifi-


198 Ecosystem properties<br />

cant temperature <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce that needs to be accounted (Le Bris et al.,<br />

2001). The sensitivity of the technique used to potential interferences of<br />

seawater major ions should additionally be consi<strong>de</strong>red in the calibration<br />

protocol, especially in environments with variable salinities (estuaries,<br />

brines, salt-marshes).<br />

4.3 Chemical speciation<br />

The capacity of sensing techniques to measure various chemical species<br />

of the same compound is also of major importance while consi<strong>de</strong>ring the<br />

toxicity or bioavailability of a chemical compound. Rather than quantifying<br />

the total concentration of a dissolved element encompassing both<br />

biologically active and inactive <strong>for</strong>ms, as done in reagent-based colorimetry,<br />

electrochemistry and selective membrane-based spectrometry<br />

target single species or group of reactive species. For example, among<br />

all sulphi<strong>de</strong> species, the H 2<br />

S <strong>for</strong>m has the strongest <strong>de</strong>leterious effect on<br />

non-adapted organisms, due to its capacity to pass gas exchange membrane.<br />

Bulk sulphi<strong>de</strong> analysis on water or pore water samples with the<br />

Cline or the iodometric methods does not enable the discrimination of<br />

this toxic sulphi<strong>de</strong> <strong>for</strong>m from iron complexes, which are abundant in<br />

most sulfidic marine environments and much less toxic. While in situ<br />

colorimetric analysers based on laboratory methods typically measure<br />

the total concentration of soluble sulphi<strong>de</strong> (Le Bris et al., 2003), electrochemical<br />

techniques give access to various <strong>for</strong>ms of free sulphi<strong>de</strong>,<br />

and amperometric microsensors are selective to H 2<br />

S (Jeroschewski et<br />

al., 1996). Potentiometric sulphi<strong>de</strong> sensors are sensitive to S 2- and combined<br />

with pH measurement allows the calculation of both HS - and H 2<br />

S.<br />

Voltammetry does not discriminate these two <strong>for</strong>ms but provi<strong>de</strong>s a much<br />

better view of the different labile sulphi<strong>de</strong> species in the environment,<br />

including dissolved or colloidal iron sulphi<strong>de</strong>s (FeS aq<br />

or FeS°) and polysulphi<strong>de</strong>s<br />

(S n<br />

2-<br />

). The total concentration of sulphi<strong>de</strong> (i.e. all labile sulphur<br />

compounds in the redox state S-II) is also directly accessible in cyclic<br />

voltammetry.<br />

5. Expanding the temporal stability of chemical sensors<br />

Today, temporal variability of marine environments over days to months<br />

is still mostly addressed using physical sensors (temperature, salinity, see<br />

IV, 1). Chemical sensors were applied to the harshest benthic environments,<br />

but the typical measurement durations were often less than a few<br />

hours and successful examples of long-term <strong>de</strong>ployments are quite rare<br />

in the literature. The principle of unatten<strong>de</strong>d in situ measurement over


Part III – Chapter 1 199<br />

several months in the surrounding of hydrothermal vent macrofauna<br />

has been <strong>de</strong>monstrated <strong>for</strong> ferrous iron Fe(II) by flow colorimetry using<br />

low energy osmotic pumps and solenoid valves (Chapin et al., 2002).<br />

Since that time, similar <strong>de</strong>vices have been <strong>de</strong>signed based on solenoid<br />

valves and peristaltic pumps (e.g. Vuillemin et al., 2009 <strong>for</strong> Fe(II)) <strong>for</strong><br />

unatten<strong>de</strong>d long-term <strong>de</strong>ployment. Be<strong>for</strong>e these systems can be used routinely,<br />

several issues are still to be solved including power, mechanical<br />

and electronic ruggedness, in addition to standard solution and reagent<br />

instability.<br />

Tools with higher ruggedness and simpler operation procedures were proposed<br />

<strong>for</strong> this purpose. For example, UV spectrometry overcomes the<br />

addition of reagents and has been consi<strong>de</strong>red as an alternative, though it<br />

has not been validated <strong>for</strong> benthic environment studies. Electrochemistry<br />

is another option, which offers the advantage of mechanical ruggedness<br />

(no moving parts like pumps and valves) and low energy requirements.<br />

However, in this case, calibration issues are important since calibration is<br />

not done in situ but in laboratory and there<strong>for</strong>e raise the problem of longterm<br />

stability of measurement during <strong>de</strong>ployment. Currently, the availability<br />

of integrated sensor systems <strong>for</strong> long term continuous monitoring<br />

from shallow to great <strong>de</strong>pth is scarce, but a few examples of autonomous<br />

<strong>de</strong>ployments over several days to weeks are known. A first <strong>de</strong>ep-sea<br />

autonomous voltammetric analyzer, the ISEA system, <strong>de</strong>signed by AIS<br />

(www.aishome.com), was successfully <strong>de</strong>ployed to record the concentration<br />

of H 2<br />

S <strong>for</strong> up to 3 days on an animal assemblage of the East Pacific<br />

Rise (Luther III et al., 2008; Lutz et al., 2008). These series revealed that<br />

H 2<br />

S can change over two or<strong>de</strong>rs of magnitu<strong>de</strong> (from non-<strong>de</strong>tectable levels<br />

to 30μM) within minutes to hours several times during a few days.<br />

Using potentiometric electro<strong>de</strong>s, Ye et al. (2008) found a similar pattern<br />

in the same <strong>de</strong>ep-sea environment with total dissolved H 2<br />

S fluctuating<br />

periodically over about 12 hours, reflecting tidal influence. The <strong>de</strong>tection<br />

system was integrated in a flow <strong>de</strong>vice allowing calibration of the<br />

electro<strong>de</strong> in situ.<br />

Autonomous miniaturised potentiometers (<strong>de</strong>signed by NKE, France)<br />

and equipped with lab-ma<strong>de</strong> pH and sulphi<strong>de</strong> electro<strong>de</strong>s were adapted<br />

<strong>for</strong> the purpose of long-term <strong>de</strong>ployment (Le Bris et al., 2001; 2008; see<br />

figure 4). Although they were mostly used <strong>for</strong> short term measurements<br />

during submersible dives of a few hours (Le Bris et al., 2001; 2006), their<br />

unatten<strong>de</strong>d use over 3 days in a shallow water mangrove swamp revealed<br />

the potentiality of these simple and easy-to-handle tools <strong>for</strong> autonomous<br />

monitoring in various environments (Laurent et al., 2009). Solid-state<br />

voltammetric and potentiometric electro<strong>de</strong>s are particularly suitable<br />

<strong>for</strong> harsh conditions within the environment of benthic fauna. Using<br />

microelectro<strong>de</strong>s, these techniques are also well suited <strong>for</strong> low cost, energy


200 Ecosystem properties<br />

Figure 4: Deployment of chemical sensors <strong>for</strong> benthic studies. A. Potentiometric<br />

sensors <strong>de</strong>ployed <strong>for</strong> continuous sulfi<strong>de</strong> and pH measurements over two weeks on<br />

a hydrothermal mussel bed at 2500 meter <strong>de</strong>pth (9°50’N, East Pacific Rise) © Le<br />

bris/MESCAL/Ifremer. b. Programmation of autonomous sensors <strong>for</strong> unatten<strong>de</strong>d<br />

in situ monitoring of a wood fall experiment over 4 months 500m <strong>de</strong>ep (Lacaze<br />

Duthiers canyon, Mediterranean sea) ©Le bris/LECob/UPMC. C. Autonomous<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rwater potentiometers (NKE) equipped with laboratory-ma<strong>de</strong> pH and sulfi<strong>de</strong><br />

electro<strong>de</strong>s similar to those used in A and b. The length of the ruler is 30 cm.<br />

and size-limited monitoring <strong>de</strong>vices (Pizeta et al., 2003). Since ef<strong>for</strong>ts<br />

to integrate both sensors and their electronics in shallow water housings<br />

(Unisense and MPI divers system) have expan<strong>de</strong>d, the capacity <strong>for</strong><br />

in situ <strong>de</strong>ployments increased (Vopel et al., 2005). In addition to commercialised<br />

one-dimensional sediment profilers (Unisense), recently<br />

<strong>de</strong>veloped systems offer access to three-dimensional mapping and a


Part III – Chapter 1 201<br />

wi<strong>de</strong>r range of application, such as coral reef microhabitats (Weber et<br />

al., 2007).<br />

Expanding the autonomy of these chemical sensors over several days to<br />

months is the most crucial need today, but the most difficult task is to<br />

ensure the stability of electro<strong>de</strong> response. Uncontrollable matrix interferences,<br />

lack of specificity or selectivity, problems of reversibility, fouling<br />

and drift highlighted by analytical chemists impe<strong>de</strong>d the transfer of<br />

electrochemical techniques <strong>for</strong> in situ long-term monitoring (Tercier and<br />

Buffle, 1993; Muller and Stierli, 1999). In this prospect, promising laboratory<br />

works showed that the potentiometric Ag/Ag 2<br />

S electro<strong>de</strong> could<br />

have a stable response to a certain level over two months (Lacombe et al.,<br />

2007), at least when operated with a laboratory instrument in artificial<br />

seawater and ambient temperature. However the stability of electrochemical<br />

analyses in situ when sensors are exposed to colloids, biofilms, and<br />

varying pH and temperature has to be better comprehen<strong>de</strong>d. In situ testing<br />

of completely autonomous and submersible <strong>de</strong>vices over several months<br />

on <strong>de</strong>grading wood in a mangrove waters, confirmed their relative stability<br />

in a microbiologically active environment (Le Bris et al., submitted,<br />

Yücel et al., submitted). Deployments over two to three weeks in <strong>de</strong>ep<br />

sea hydrothermal environments confirmed calibration stability at ambient<br />

pressure but in situ stability still needs to be address un<strong>de</strong>r simulated<br />

pressure and temperature conditions (Contreira et al., 2011).<br />

6. Conclusion<br />

Compared to the profusion of sensor principles and techniques available<br />

<strong>for</strong> ex situ analyses of benthic marine environments, only a few are operational<br />

in situ today. Among the sensors adapted to un<strong>de</strong>rwater use even<br />

fewer sensors have achieved sufficient reliability and ruggedness <strong>for</strong> common<br />

use in benthic <strong>ecology</strong>. Microelectro<strong>de</strong>s <strong>de</strong>veloped since the 1980s<br />

have significantly improved our capacity to characterise physicochemical<br />

gradients at the sediment-water interface in relation with the structure and<br />

activities of microbial communities. However, the inherent fragility of<br />

microelectro<strong>de</strong>s resulted in a biased sampling of benthic habitats toward<br />

soft sediments, excluding the habitat of macro-organisms with hard shells<br />

or tubes or rocky substrates. A significant step <strong>for</strong>ward is still awaited <strong>for</strong><br />

making in situ sensors operational <strong>for</strong> a wi<strong>de</strong>r range of ecosystem studies.<br />

There is a great need to encourage the integration of new sensing techniques<br />

<strong>de</strong>veloped by analytical chemists as part of experimental <strong>de</strong>signs<br />

in <strong>ecology</strong>. For this, however, a paradigm change is required: high frequency<br />

but low precision data obtained in situ in natural environments<br />

can be of much higher relevance to the ecological processes studied than


202 Ecosystem properties<br />

few high quality analyses per<strong>for</strong>med on samples in controlled laboratory<br />

conditions. The challenge is to gather interdisciplinary expertise, at the<br />

interface of geochemistry, <strong>ecology</strong> and analytical chemistry in or<strong>de</strong>r to<br />

appreciate the advantages and drawbacks of the various techniques and<br />

their possible combination. In<strong>de</strong>ed no standard set of in situ sensors in<br />

benthic <strong>ecology</strong> exists, but rather a bunch of available techniques that<br />

need to be combined to answer specific scientific issues and <strong>de</strong>velop comprehensive<br />

mechanistic mo<strong>de</strong>ls.<br />

Authors’ references<br />

Nadine Le Bris, Leonardo Contreira-Pereira, Mustafa Yücel:<br />

Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Laboratoire d’écogéochimie <strong>de</strong>s environnements<br />

benthiques, CNRS-UPMC FRE3350, Banyuls-sur-Mer, France.<br />

Corresponding author: Nadine Le Bris, lebris@obs-banyuls.fr<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

This review was supported by UPMC, CNRS, the TOTAL fundation<br />

and the European commission, within the SENSEnet ITN network<br />

(International sensor <strong>de</strong>velopment network GA 237868). The TOTAL<br />

fundation supports the post-doctoral grant of Mustafa Yücel, as part of the<br />

chair “Extreme marine environments, biodiversity, and global change”.<br />

References<br />

Al-Horani F. A., Al-Moghrabi S. M., De Beer D., 2003. Microsensor study<br />

of photosynthesis and calcification in the scleractinian coral, Galaxea<br />

fascicularis: active internal carbon cycle. Journal of Experimental Marine<br />

Biology and Ecology, 288, pp. 1-15.<br />

Berner R. A., 1963. Electro<strong>de</strong> studies of hydrogen sulfi<strong>de</strong> in marine sediments.<br />

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 27, pp. 563-575.<br />

Borum J., Pe<strong>de</strong>rsen O., Greve T. M., Frankovich T. A., Zieman J. C., Fourqurean<br />

J. W., Mad<strong>de</strong>n C. J., 2005. The potential role of plant oxygen and sulfi<strong>de</strong><br />

dynamics in die-off events of the tropical seagrass, Thalassia testudinum.<br />

Journal of Ecology, 93, pp. 148-158.<br />

Boulart C., Mowlem M. C., Connelly D. P., Dutasta J.-P., German C. R., 2008.<br />

A new in situ methane sensor <strong>for</strong> the study of hydrothermal plumes based


Part III – Chapter 1 203<br />

on surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Geophysical Research Abstracts, 10,<br />

EGU2008-02749.<br />

Brewer P. G., Malby G., Pasteris J. D., White S. N., Peltzer E. T., Wopenka B.,<br />

Freeman J., Brown M. O., 2004. Development of a laser Raman spectrometer<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>de</strong>ep-ocean science, Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research<br />

Papers, 51, pp. 739-753.<br />

Buffle J., Horvai G., (Eds) 2000. In situ monitoring of aquatic systems. Chemical<br />

analysis and speciation. IUPAC Series on analytical and physical chemistry<br />

of environmental systems, 6. John Willey and Son, Chichester, UK.<br />

Buffle J., Tercier-Waeber M.-L., 2005. Voltammetric environmental trace-metal<br />

analysis and speciation: from laboratory to in situ measurements. Trends in<br />

Analytical Chemistry, 24, pp. 172-191.<br />

Buffle J., Tercier-Waeber M. L., 2000. In situ voltammetry: concepts and practice<br />

<strong>for</strong> trace analysis and speciation, in: J. Buffle, G. Hoarvai (Eds.), In situ<br />

monitoring of aquatic systems – Chemical analysis and speciation. IUPAC<br />

Series on analytical and physical chemistry of environmental systems, 6,<br />

pp. 279-405.<br />

Cai W. J., Reimers C. E., 2003. <strong>Sensors</strong> <strong>for</strong> pH and pCO 2<br />

measurements in<br />

seawater and at the sediment-water interface, in Buffle J. and Horvai<br />

G. (Eds), In situ monitoring in aquatic systems. Chemical analysis and<br />

speciation., IUPAC series on analytical and physical chemistry of<br />

environmental systems, 6, pp. 75-120.<br />

Chapin T. P., Jannasch H. W., Johnson K. S., 2002. In situ osmotic analyzer <strong>for</strong><br />

the year-long continuous <strong>de</strong>termination of Fe in hydrothermal systems.<br />

Analytica Chimica Acta, 463, pp. 265-274.<br />

Contreira L., Yücel M., Brulport J.-P., Comtat M., Le Bris N., 2011. Comparative<br />

assessment of potentiometric and voltammetric sensors <strong>for</strong> autonomous<br />

monitoring in <strong>de</strong>ep sea sulfidic environments. Geophysical Research<br />

Abstracts, 13, EGU2011-7765.<br />

De Beer D., 2002. Microsensor studies of oxygen, carbon and nitrogen cycles<br />

in lake sediments and microbial mats, in: Taillefert M., Rozan T. F. (Eds),<br />

ACS Symposium Series Environmental Electrochemistry: Analyses of<br />

trace element biochemistry, 811, pp. 227-246.<br />

De Beer D., Sauter E., Niemann H., Kaul N., Witte U., Foucher J.-P., Schluter<br />

M., Boetius A., 2006. In situ fluxes and zonation of microbial activity in<br />

surface sediments of the Haakon Mosby mud volcano. Limnology and<br />

Oceanography, 51, pp. 1315-1331.<br />

Feely R. A., Wanninkhof R., Milburna H. B., Cosca C. E., Stapp. M., Murphy<br />

P. P., 1998. A new automated un<strong>de</strong>rway system <strong>for</strong> making high precision<br />

pCO 2<br />

measurements onboard research ships. Analytica Chimica Acta,<br />

377, pp. 185-191.<br />

Glud, R. N., Gun<strong>de</strong>rsen J. K., Ramsing N. B., 2003. Electrochemical and<br />

optical microsensors <strong>for</strong> in situ oxygen measurements, in: Buffle, J.,<br />

Horvai G. (Eds) In Situ monitoring of aquatic systems. Chemical analysis


204 Ecosystem properties<br />

and speciation. IUPAC Series on analytical and physical chemistry of<br />

environmental systems, 6, pp. 19-73.<br />

Glud R. N., Ramsing N. B., Gun<strong>de</strong>rsen J. K., Klimant I., 1996. Planar optro<strong>de</strong>s:<br />

a new tool <strong>for</strong> fine scale measurements of two dimensional O 2<br />

distribution<br />

in benthic communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 140, pp. 217-226.<br />

Glud R. N., Klimant I., Holst G., Kohls O., Meyer V., Kühl M., Gun<strong>de</strong>rsen<br />

J. K., 1999. Adoption, test and in situ measurements with O 2<br />

microopto<strong>de</strong>s<br />

on benthic lan<strong>de</strong>rs. DeepSea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research<br />

Papers, 46, pp. 171-183.<br />

Glud R. N., Wenzhöfer F., Tengberg A., Mid<strong>de</strong>lboe M., Oguri K., Kitazato H.,<br />

2005. Distribution of oxygen in surface sediments from central Sagami Bay,<br />

Japan: In situ measurements by microelectro<strong>de</strong>s and planar opto<strong>de</strong>s. Deep<br />

Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 52, pp. 1974-1987.<br />

Janz G., Ives D. J. G., 1968. Silver, Silver Chlori<strong>de</strong> Electro<strong>de</strong>s. Annals of the<br />

New York Aca<strong>de</strong>my of Sciences, 148, pp. 210-221.<br />

Jeroschewski P., Steuckart C., Kühl M., 1996. An amperometric microsensor <strong>for</strong><br />

the <strong>de</strong>termination of H 2<br />

S in aquatic environments. Analytical Chemistry,<br />

68, pp. 4351-4357.<br />

Johnson K. S., Beelher C.L., Sakamoto-Arnold C. M., 1986. A submersible flow<br />

analysis system. Analytica Chimica Acta, 179, pp. 245-257<br />

Johnson K. S., Childress J. J., Hessler R. R., Sakamoto-Arnold C. M., Beelher<br />

C. L., 1988. Chemical and biological interactions in the Rose Gar<strong>de</strong>n<br />

hydrothermal vent field, Galapagos spreading center. Deep Sea Research<br />

Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 35, pp. 1723-1744.<br />

Johnson K. S., Childress J. J., Beelher C. L., Sakamoto C. M., 1994.<br />

Biogeochemistry of hydrothermal vent mussel communities: the <strong>de</strong>ep sea<br />

analogue to the intertidal zone. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic<br />

Research Papers, 41, pp. 993-1011.<br />

Johnson K. S., Needoba J. A., Riser S. C., Showers W. J., 2007. Chemical<br />

sensor networks <strong>for</strong> the aquatic environment. Chemical Reviews, 107,<br />

pp. 623-640.<br />

Johnson K. S., Coletti L. J., 2002. In situ ultraviolet spectrophotometry <strong>for</strong> high<br />

resolution and long-term monitoring of nitrite, bromi<strong>de</strong> and bisulfi<strong>de</strong> in<br />

the ocean. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 49,<br />

pp. 1291-1305.<br />

Jørgensen B. B., Revsbech N. P., 1983. Photosynthesis and structure of benthic<br />

microbial mats: microelectro<strong>de</strong> and SEM studies of four cyanobacterial<br />

communities. Limnology and Oceanography, 28, pp. 1075-1093.<br />

Klimant I., Meyer V., Kühl M., 1995. Fiber-optic oxygen microsensors, a new<br />

tool in aquatic biology. Limnology and Oceanography, 40, pp. 1159–1165.<br />

König B., Kohls O., Holst G., Glud R. N., Kühl M., 2005. Fabrication and<br />

test of sol-gel based planar oxygen opto<strong>de</strong>s <strong>for</strong> use in aquatic sediments.<br />

Marine Chemistry, 97, pp. 262-276.<br />

Kühl M., Steuckart C., 2000. <strong>Sensors</strong> <strong>for</strong> in situ analysis of sulfi<strong>de</strong> in aquatic<br />

systems, in Buffle J., Horvai G., (Eds) In situ monitoring of aquatic


Part III – Chapter 1 205<br />

systems. Chemical analysis and speciation. IUPAC Series on analytical<br />

and physical chemistry of environmental systems, 6, pp. 121-159.<br />

Kühl M., Steuckart C., Eickert G., Jeroschewski P., 1998. A H 2<br />

S microsensor <strong>for</strong><br />

profiling biofilms and sediments: application in an acidic lake sediment.<br />

Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 15, pp. 201-209.<br />

Lacombe M., Garcon V., Comtat M., Oriol L., Sudre J., Thouron D., Le Bris N.,<br />

Provost C., 2007. Silicate <strong>de</strong>termination in sea water: toward a reagentless<br />

electrochemical method. Marine Chemistry, 106, pp. 489-497.<br />

Laurent M. C. Z., Gros O., Brulport J.-P., Gaill F., Le Bris N., 2009. Sunken<br />

wood habitat <strong>for</strong> thiotrophic symbiosis in mangrove swamps. Marine<br />

Environmental Research, 67, pp. 83–88.<br />

Larsen L. H., Revsbech N. P., Binnerup S. J. A., 1996. Microsensor <strong>for</strong> nitrate<br />

based on immobilized <strong>de</strong>nitrifying bacteria. Applied and Environmental<br />

Microbiology, 62, 4, pp. 1248-1251 .<br />

Lawrence N. S., Deo R. P., Wang J., 2004a. Electrochemical <strong>de</strong>termination<br />

of hydrogen sulfi<strong>de</strong> at carbon nanotube modified electro<strong>de</strong>s. Analytica<br />

Chimica Acta, 517, pp. 131-137.<br />

Lawrence N. S., Deo R. P., Wang J., 2004b. Detection of homocysteine at<br />

carbon nanotube paste electro<strong>de</strong>s. Talanta, 63, pp. 443-449.<br />

Le bris N., Sarradin P.-M., birot D., Alayse-Danet A.-M., 2000. A new<br />

chemical analyzer <strong>for</strong> in situ measurement of nitrate and total sulfi<strong>de</strong> over<br />

hydrothermal vent biological communities. Marine Chemistry, 72, pp. 1-15.<br />

Le Bris N., Sarradin P.-M., Pennec S., 2001. A new <strong>de</strong>ep-sea probe <strong>for</strong> in situ<br />

pH measurement in the environment of hydrothermal vent biological<br />

communities. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers,<br />

48, pp. 1941-1951.<br />

Le Bris N., Sarradin P.-M., Caprais J.-C., 2003. Contrasted sulphi<strong>de</strong> chemistries<br />

in the environment of 13°N EPR vent fauna. Deep Sea Research Part I:<br />

Oceanographic Research Papers, 50, pp. 737-747.<br />

Le Bris N., Govenar B., Le Gall C., Fisher C. R., 2006. Variability of physicochemical<br />

conditions in 9°N EPR diffuse flow vent habitats. Marine<br />

Chemistry, 98, pp. 167-182.<br />

Le Bris N., Brulport J.-P., Laurent M., Lacombe M., Garcon V., Gros O., Comtat<br />

M., Gaill F., 2008. Autonomous potentiometric sensor <strong>for</strong> in situ sulfi<strong>de</strong><br />

monitoring in marine sulfidic media. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 10,<br />

EGU2008-A-11476.<br />

Luther III G. W., Reimers C. E., Nuzzio D. b. Lovalvo D., 1999. In situ<br />

<strong>de</strong>ployment of voltammetric, potentiometric, and amperometric<br />

microelectro<strong>de</strong>s from a ROV to <strong>de</strong>termine dissolved O2, Mn, Fe, S(-II),<br />

and pH in porewaters. Environmental Science and Technology, 33,<br />

pp. 4352-4356.<br />

Luther III G. W., Rozan T. F., Taillefert M., Nuzzio D. B., Di Meo C.,<br />

Shank T. M., Lutz R. A., Cary S. C., 2001a. Chemical speciation drives<br />

hydrothermal vent <strong>ecology</strong>. Nature, 410, pp. 813-816.


206 Ecosystem properties<br />

Luther III G. W., Glazer b. T., Hohmann L., Popp. J. I., Taillefert M., Rozan T.<br />

F., bren<strong>de</strong>l P. J., Theberge S. M., Nuzzio D. b., 2001b. Sulfur speciation<br />

monitored in situ with solid state gold amalgam voltammetric microelectro<strong>de</strong>s:<br />

polysulfi<strong>de</strong>s as a special case in sediments, microbial mats and hydrothermal<br />

vent waters. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 3, pp. 61-66.<br />

Luther III G. W., Glazer B. T., Ma S., Trouwborst R. E., Moore T. S., Metzger E.,<br />

Kraiya C., Waite T. J., Druschel G., Sundby B., Taillefert M., Nuzzio D. B.,<br />

Shank T. M., Lewis B. L., Bren<strong>de</strong>l P. J., 2008. Use of voltammetric solidstate<br />

(micro) electro<strong>de</strong>s <strong>for</strong> studying biogeochemical processes: laboratory<br />

measurements to real time measurements with an in situ electrochemical<br />

analyzer (ISEA). Marine Chemistry, 108, pp. 221- 235.<br />

Lutz R.A., Shank T.M., Luther III G.W., Vetriani C., Tolstoy M., Nuzzio<br />

D.B., Moore T.S., Waldhauser F., Crespo-Medina M., Chatziefthimiou<br />

A.D., Annis E.R., Reed A.J., 2008. Interrelationships between vent fluid<br />

chemistry, temperature, seismic activity, and biological community<br />

structure of mussel-dominated <strong>de</strong>ep-sea vent along the East Pacific Rise.<br />

Journal of Shellfish Research, 27, 177-190.<br />

Merkoçi A., 2006. Carbon nanotubes in analytical sciences. Microchimica<br />

Acta, 152, pp. 157-174.<br />

Moore T. S., Mullaugh K. M., Holyoke R. R., Madison A., Yucel M., Luther III<br />

G. W., 2009. Marine chemical technology and sensors <strong>for</strong> marine waters:<br />

potentials and limits. Annual Review of Marine Science, 1, pp. 91-115.<br />

Müller B., Stierli R., 1999. In situ <strong>de</strong>termination of sulfi<strong>de</strong> profiles in sediment<br />

porewaters with a miniaturized Ag/Ag2S electro<strong>de</strong>. Analytica Chimica<br />

Acta, 401, pp. 257-264.<br />

Pizeta I., Billon G., Fischer J. C., Wartel M., 2003. Solid microelectro<strong>de</strong>s <strong>for</strong> in<br />

situ voltammetric measurements. Electroanalysis, 15, pp. 1389-1396.<br />

Preisler A., De Beer D., Litchschlag A., Lavik G., Boetius A., Jørgensen B. B.,<br />

2007. Biological and chemical sulfi<strong>de</strong> oxidation in Beggiatoa inhabited<br />

marine sediment. The ISME Journal, 1, pp. 341-353.<br />

Reimers C. E., 2007. Applications of microelectro<strong>de</strong>s to problems in chemical<br />

oceanography. Chemical Reviews, 107, pp. 590-600.<br />

Revsbech N. P., Jørgensen B. B., Blackburn T. H., Cohen Y., 1983. Microelectro<strong>de</strong><br />

studies of the photosynthesis and O 2<br />

, H 2<br />

S and pH profiles of a microbial<br />

mat. Limnology and Oceanography, 28, pp. 1062-1074.<br />

Revsbech N. P., 1989. An oxygen microsensor with a guard catho<strong>de</strong>. Limnology<br />

and Oceanography, 34, pp. 474-478.<br />

Sarradin P.-M., Le Bris N., Le Gall C., Rodier P., 2005. Fe analysis by the ferrozine<br />

method: adaptation to FIA towards in situ analysis in hydrothermal<br />

environment. Talanta, 66, pp. 1131-1138.<br />

Sarrazin J., Juniper S. K., Massoth G., Legendre P., 1999. Physical and chemical<br />

factors influencing species distribution on hydrothermal sulfi<strong>de</strong> edifices<br />

of the Juan <strong>de</strong> Fuca Ridge, northeast Pacific. Marine Ecology Progress<br />

Series, 190, pp. 89-112.


Part III – Chapter 1 207<br />

Schluter M., Gentz T., 2008. Application of membrane inlet mass spectrometry<br />

<strong>for</strong> online and in situ analysis of methane in aquatic environments.<br />

Journal of the American Society of Mass Spectrometry, 19, pp. 1395-<br />

1402.<br />

Stahl H., Glud A., Schrö<strong>de</strong>r C. R., Klimant I., Tengberg A. Glud R. N., 2006.<br />

Time-resolved pH imaging in marine sediments with a luminescent planar<br />

opto<strong>de</strong>. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 4, pp. 336-345.<br />

Taillefert M., Luther III G. W., Nuzzio D. B., 2000. The application of<br />

electrochemical tools <strong>for</strong> in situ measurements in aquatic systems: a review.<br />

Electroanalysis, 12, pp. 401-412.<br />

Tercier M.-L., Buffle J. 1993. In situ voltammetric measurements in natural<br />

waters: future prospects and challenges. Electroanalysis, 5, pp. 187-200.<br />

Viollier E., Rabouille C., Apitz S. E., Breuer E., Chaillou G., Dedieu K.,<br />

Furukawa Y., Grenz C., Hall P., Janssen F., Mor<strong>for</strong>d J. L., Poggiale J.,<br />

Roberts S., Shimmield T., Taillefert M., Tengberg A., Wenzhofer F., Witte<br />

U., 2003. Benthic biogeochemistry: state of the art technologies and<br />

gui<strong>de</strong>lines <strong>for</strong> the future of in situ survey. Journal of Experimental Marine<br />

Biology and Ecology, 285, pp. 5-31.<br />

Vismann B., 1991. Sulfi<strong>de</strong> tolerance: physiological adaptation and ecological<br />

implication. Ophelia, 34, pp. 1-27.<br />

Vismann B., 1996. Sulfi<strong>de</strong> exposure experiments: The sulfi<strong>de</strong> electro<strong>de</strong> and a<br />

set-up automatically controllling sulfi<strong>de</strong>, oxygen and pH. The Journal of<br />

Experimental Biology, 204, pp. 131-140.<br />

Vopel K., Thistle D., Ott J., Bright M., Roy H., 2005. Wave-induced H 2<br />

S flux<br />

sustains a chemoautotrophic symbiosis. Limnology and Oceanography,<br />

50, pp. 128-133<br />

Vuillemin R., Sanfilippo L., Moscetta P., Zudaire L., Carbones E., Maria E.,<br />

Tricoire C., Oriol L., Blain S., Le Bris N., Lebaron P., 2009. Continuous<br />

nutrient automated monitoring on the Mediterranean Sea using in situ<br />

flow analyser. OCEANS 2009 MTS/IEEE, Biloxi-Marine technology <strong>for</strong><br />

our future: global and locate challenges, pp. 1-8.<br />

Wang F., Tessier A., Buffle J., 1998. Voltammetric <strong>de</strong>termination of elemental<br />

sulfur in pore waters. Limnology and Oceanography, 43, pp. 1353-1361.<br />

Wankel S. D., Joye S. B., Samarkin V. A., Shah S. R., Frie<strong>de</strong>rich G., Melas-<br />

Kyriazi J., Girguis P. R. 2010. New constraints on methane fluxes and<br />

rates of anaerobic methane oxidation in a Gulf of Mexico brine pool via<br />

in situ mass spectrometry. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in<br />

Oceanography, 57, pp. 2022-2029.<br />

Weber M., Faerber P., Meyer V., Lott C., Eickert G., Fabricius K. E., De beer<br />

D., 2007. In situ applications of a new diver-operated motorized<br />

micro sensor profiler. Environmental Science and Technology, 41,<br />

pp. 6210-6215.<br />

Wenzhöfer F., Holby O., Glud R. N., Nielsen H. K., Gun<strong>de</strong>rsen J. K., 2000. In<br />

situ microsensor studies of a shallow water hydrothermal vent at Milos,<br />

Greece. Marine Chemistry, 69, pp. 43-54.


208 Ecosystem properties<br />

Wieland A., Kühl M., 2000. Short-term temperature effects on oxygen and<br />

sulfi<strong>de</strong> cycling in a hypersaline cyanobacterial mat (Solar Lake, Egypt).<br />

Marine Ecology Progress Series, 196, pp. 87-102.<br />

Ye Y., Huang X., Pan Y., Han C. H., Zhao W., 2008. In situ measurement of<br />

the dissolved S 2− in seafloor diffuse flow system: sensor preparation and<br />

calibration. Journal of Zhejiang University, 3, pp. 423-428.


Chapter 2<br />

Advances in marine benthic <strong>ecology</strong><br />

using in situ chemical sensors<br />

Nadine Le Bris, Leonardo Contreira-Pereira, Mustafa Yücel<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Seafloor ecosystems play a significant role in energy transfer, nutrient<br />

recycling and carbon storage in marine environments, while sustaining<br />

diverse biological communities in a variety of benthic habitats. The abiotic<br />

properties of benthic environments reflect available resources and<br />

physical or chemical constraints on biodiversity, and are themselves<br />

modulated by biological activity. However, insufficient knowledge of the<br />

interplay between organisms and communities and the dynamic components<br />

of their environment prevents their role in ecosystem functioning<br />

to be fully un<strong>de</strong>rstood. Opening this black box is particularly crucial to<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rstand how these complex and dynamic interactions governs ecosystem<br />

responses to disturbances. In situ chemical sensing techniques are<br />

of primary importance in this context. They have provi<strong>de</strong>d the ability<br />

to <strong>de</strong>scribe how hydrodynamics, microbial activity, engineer species and<br />

chemical kinetics combine and shape in situ gradients in marine benthic<br />

systems. Complementing the inventory of available techniques and their<br />

respective advantages and limitations (see chapter III, 1), this chapter illustrates<br />

major insights in marine benthic <strong>ecology</strong> gained from the use of in<br />

situ sensors, and discusses the potentialities offered by the <strong>de</strong>velopment of<br />

autonomous sensing <strong>de</strong>vices <strong>for</strong> in situ experimental approaches.


210 Ecosystem properties<br />

2. Biological activity and habitat chemical heterogeneity<br />

2.1 Chemical gradients at interfaces<br />

Opposite vertical gradients in electron acceptors (dissolved oxygen,<br />

nitrate, sulphate as well as particulate iron and manganese oxi<strong>de</strong>s) and<br />

electron donors (ammonium, sulphi<strong>de</strong>), characterise marine redox interfaces<br />

where organic matter is <strong>de</strong>gra<strong>de</strong>d by microbes using redox reactions<br />

as an energy source (Schulz and Zabel, 2006). These gradients exist both<br />

in benthic and in pelagic environments. In the latter, <strong>de</strong>ep suboxic layer<br />

(tens to hundreds of meter thick) may <strong>for</strong>m like the one probed using in situ<br />

sensors in the black Sea (Glazer et al., 2006). This transition occurs along<br />

much more shorter distances in benthic systems. A particular example is<br />

the redox gradients occurring over <strong>de</strong>cimetre to meter-scale in the plumes<br />

of hydrothermal vents, where fluids are mixed with seawater above the<br />

seafloor. Within these narrow interfaces, specialised chemolithotrophic<br />

communities settle and grow, exploiting the energy provi<strong>de</strong>d by the combination<br />

of inorganic electron donors and acceptors in their environment.<br />

Steep changes in sulphi<strong>de</strong>, pH, as well as nitrate, oxygen, and iron, have<br />

been documented at the scale of chemosynthetic assemblages, with the<br />

use of sensors operated by <strong>de</strong>ep-sea submersibles (see figure 1, Johnson et<br />

al., 1988; Le Bris et al., 2000; 2003). The co-variation of chemical parameters<br />

with temperature, taken as a dilution tracer, revealed the combined<br />

influence of physical process (mixing) and biological activity (consumption<br />

or biologically induced heat exchange) on these gradients (Johnson<br />

et al., 1988; 1994; Le Bris et al., 2005; 2006a).<br />

Figure 1: In situ sensing of sulphi<strong>de</strong> and pH gradients at the scale of an aggregation<br />

of hydrothermal tubeworms Riftia pachyptila at 2015 meter <strong>de</strong>pth in the Gulf of<br />

Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. © S. Sievert, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute.


Part III – Chapter 2 211<br />

Due to the slow diffusion of solutes in sediment pore waters, gradients in<br />

sediment pore waters often occur over even shorter distances (e.g. <strong>de</strong>cimetre<br />

to sub-millimeter scales). Besi<strong>de</strong>s being indicative of the rate of<br />

carbon and nutrients remineralisation processes in the sediment, these<br />

gradients reflect the environmental constraints exerted on microbial communities<br />

and on benthic fauna. Particularly, the oxygen penetration <strong>de</strong>pth<br />

can extend from only a few millimetres to several centimetres below the<br />

sediment-water interface. This penetration layer <strong>de</strong>fines the habitat of<br />

microbial aerobes. As reviewed in Stockdale et al. (2009), positioning of<br />

the lower limit of the oxic layer can only be resolved using in situ microsensing<br />

techniques. While oceanographic chemical probes (mostly <strong>for</strong> pH<br />

and oxygen) have been available since the mid-twentieth century, their use<br />

by microbial ecologists <strong>for</strong> sediment studies only traces back to the early<br />

eighties (Revsbech et al., 1983). Miniaturisation of electro<strong>de</strong> tips down to<br />

c.a. 10µm <strong>for</strong> o 2<br />

offered significant advantage over sampling, as it allowed<br />

resolving chemical changes over distances as short as 25µm, which is<br />

required to highlight the processes sustaining microbial mats at the sediment<br />

water-interface. Strong gradients were thus revealed and related to<br />

the vertical zonation of bacteria and diatoms over a few millimetre-thick<br />

microbial mat from core samples of sediments (Jørgensen and Revsbech,<br />

1983).<br />

The technique is still wi<strong>de</strong>ly used, most of the time combined with the<br />

measurement of other major tracers of biogeochemical processes in marine<br />

sediments, such as sulphi<strong>de</strong>. Sulphi<strong>de</strong> is produced by the reduction of<br />

sulphate diffusing from seawater and has strong ecological implications.<br />

Besi<strong>de</strong>s being toxic to aerobes, sulphi<strong>de</strong> is used as an electron donor by<br />

chemolithotrophic microbes to gain energy. Amperometric microsensors<br />

provi<strong>de</strong>d high-resolution profiles of the most toxic sulphi<strong>de</strong> <strong>for</strong>m, H 2<br />

S, in<br />

addition to oxygen, and sometimes pH. By using these sensors, microprofiles<br />

were obtained directly in situ through microbial mats and the un<strong>de</strong>rneath<br />

sediments at shallow hydrothermal vents (Wenzhöfer et al., 2000)<br />

or greater <strong>de</strong>pth (Gun<strong>de</strong>rsen and Jørgensen, 1992; De Beer et al., 2006).<br />

These data illustrated steep sulphi<strong>de</strong> concentration increases from zero to<br />

as high as millimolar levels.<br />

Beyond assessing sulphate and oxygen consumption rates, and related<br />

carbon remineralization rates, these profiles offered useful in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

on the drivers of microbial diversity and distribution in marine sediments.<br />

Chemical profiles of oxygen and sulphi<strong>de</strong> in different sulphidic<br />

microbial mats of a <strong>de</strong>ep-sea mud volcano in the eastern Mediterranean<br />

Sea, revealed strong habitat preferences <strong>for</strong> different sulphi<strong>de</strong>-oxidising<br />

microbe types (Grünke et al., 2011). Besi<strong>de</strong> their catabolic requirements,<br />

it was also proposed that sulphi<strong>de</strong> gradients are used by motile microbes<br />

as chemical cue to position themselves within the sediment. A steep


212 Ecosystem properties<br />

sulphi<strong>de</strong> concentration increase would thus prevent the sulphi<strong>de</strong> oxidising<br />

Beggiatoa strains, which stores nitrate from shallow sediment layers,<br />

to get lost in <strong>de</strong>eper sulphi<strong>de</strong>-rich regions of the sediment (Preisler et<br />

al., 2007). The use of an amperometric nitrate microsensor in combination<br />

with oxygen, pH and sulphi<strong>de</strong> microsensors greatly improved the<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of the <strong>ecology</strong> of these wi<strong>de</strong>ly distributed chemolithotrophic<br />

microbes in marine sediments. For example, a comparison of in situ<br />

nitrate profiles in mats of Beggiatoa, a sulphi<strong>de</strong>-oxidizing bacterium, with<br />

the total concentration of nitrate after bacterial cell lease confirmed the<br />

storage of nitrate in intracellular vacuoles. In turn, this storage capacity<br />

allows sulphi<strong>de</strong>-oxidising bacteria to survive <strong>for</strong> days in the sediments,<br />

outsi<strong>de</strong> of the upper part of the vertical redox zonation where nitrate is<br />

supplied (Preisler et al., 2007).<br />

Sedimentary profiles of various iron species is also of major ecological<br />

relevance. The coupling of iron and sulphi<strong>de</strong> chemistries in sediment is<br />

known to control sulphi<strong>de</strong> toxicity and bioavailability. In Beggiatoa mats,<br />

chemical oxidation of H 2<br />

S with iron oxi<strong>de</strong>s unexpectedly appeared to be<br />

the main sulphi<strong>de</strong> consuming process (Preisler et al., 2007). Furthermore,<br />

the <strong>for</strong>mation of less labile precipitated <strong>for</strong>ms of iron sulphi<strong>de</strong> exerts a major<br />

control on biogeochemical cycling and habitat conditions (Stockdale et<br />

al., 2009). In situ voltammetry on gold-amalgam micro-electro<strong>de</strong>s proved<br />

to be a very powerful technique to access the dissolved or colloid <strong>for</strong>ms<br />

of reduced and oxidised iron and sulphi<strong>de</strong> involved in these processes. G.<br />

W. Luther III from the University of Delaware and his group ma<strong>de</strong> this<br />

technique fully operational <strong>for</strong> in situ use up to 3000m <strong>de</strong>ep within redox<br />

interfaces above the seafloor (Bren<strong>de</strong>l and Luther III, 1995; Luther III et<br />

al., 2008). A first <strong>de</strong>ep sea in situ sediment profiling voltammetric system<br />

has recently been applied in the hydrothermal environment of the Loihi<br />

Seamount, <strong>de</strong>scribing the intricate iron cycling in this iron-rich environment<br />

(Glazer and Rouxel, 2009).<br />

2.2. Habitat heterogeneity on and below the seafloor<br />

By offering a much better spatial coverage and resolution than achievable<br />

from sampling, in situ measurements allowed to document horizontal<br />

changes in chemical gradients. Changes occurring at scales ranging from<br />

centimetres to metres or tens of metres are often related to the distribution<br />

of fauna and macrophyte assemblages. For example, higher sulphi<strong>de</strong><br />

levels in seagrass bed sediments compared to non-vegetated surrounding<br />

sediments were documented by Hebert and Morse (2003). The higher<br />

sulphi<strong>de</strong> level was attributed to the enrichment of organic material in<br />

sediment. Furthermore, Borum et al. (2005) highlighted one to two or<strong>de</strong>r<br />

of magnitu<strong>de</strong> increases in sulphi<strong>de</strong> from 2 to 6cm <strong>de</strong>ep (up to more than


Part III – Chapter 2 213<br />

500µM) between <strong>de</strong>nsely vegetated areas and Thalassia testidum (a seagrass)<br />

die-off patches.<br />

At hydrothermal vents, the mapping of oxygen, sulphi<strong>de</strong>, iron and manganese<br />

and other chemical factors at the surface of faunal assemblages, using<br />

both colorimetric analysers and electrochemical sensors, revealed steep<br />

transitions between the habitats of different dominant chemosynthetic<br />

species (Sarrazin et al., 1999; Le Bris et al., 2000; Le Bris et al., 2006;<br />

Podowski et al., 2010). Organic fall <strong>de</strong>gradation on the seafloor, such as<br />

whale skeletons, similarly induces marked lateral chemical zonation with<br />

distinct sulphi<strong>de</strong> maxima in the sediment that were <strong>de</strong>scribed using in situ<br />

amperometric microprofilers (Treu<strong>de</strong> et al., 2009). At kilometre scale (i.e.<br />

the diameter of the Haakon Mosby mud volcano), Nieman et al. (2006)<br />

and De Beer et al. (2006) found strong differences in the sulphi<strong>de</strong> and<br />

oxygen gradients characterising areas occupied by tubeworms, microbial<br />

mats, as well as the centre of the volcano without visible colonisation.<br />

Interestingly, these authors also pointed <strong>de</strong>eper sulphate penetration and<br />

sulphi<strong>de</strong> production in the sediments colonised by tubeworms illustrating<br />

their large influence on sediment profiles.<br />

The effect of bioturbation and bioirrigation on the fluxes at the sedimentwater<br />

interface is often accounted <strong>for</strong> by <strong>de</strong>fining a specific diffusion coefficient,<br />

which is used to extrapolate fluxes over larger areas. In reality,<br />

faunal activity results in very complex and diverse gradient shapes, which<br />

cannot be reduced to a simple diffusion gradient according to the Fick’s<br />

first law (Glud et al., 2005; Bertic and Ziebis, 2009). Even when classical<br />

diffusion profiles are obtained, significant changes in microsensor<br />

profiles are reported within centimeter distances, reflecting the heterogeneous<br />

organisation of meiofaunal and microbial communities within<br />

sediments (Glud et al., 2005; Stahl et al., 2006). Similar to macrofauna,<br />

macrophytes create marked zonation around their rhizosphere, both due<br />

to the enrichment in labile organic compounds and the oxygen release in<br />

the sediment by roots (Hebert and Morse, 2003, Borum et al., 2005). By<br />

using a gold-amalgam electro<strong>de</strong>, Hebert and Morse (2003) not only documented<br />

large differences between adjacent vegetated and unvegetated<br />

sediments, but they also found up to 80 µM difference in the maximum<br />

sulphi<strong>de</strong> content between two cores collected 1.5cm apart in the rhizosphere<br />

region of a vegetated sediment. Despite these studies, the relevance<br />

of spatial heterogeneity on nutrients and carbon fluxes has been largely<br />

overlooked in marine benthic <strong>ecology</strong>.<br />

The lateral heterogeneity that was already recognised from multiple series<br />

of sediment cores can now be captured at centimetres scale with microsensors<br />

and down to even millimetres with planar opto<strong>de</strong>s. Assessing<br />

the influence of habitat heterogeneity on microbial activities will help<br />

to better integrate this unevenness into ecological mo<strong>de</strong>ls. As recently


214 Ecosystem properties<br />

illustrated by Bertic and Ziebis (2009), microsensors offer the opportunity<br />

to link benthic biogeochemical processes with biological diversity,<br />

thus addressing the control of burrowing organisms on the diversity and<br />

activity of microbial communities. These tools are undoubtedly opening<br />

new ways to un<strong>de</strong>rstand the mechanisms un<strong>de</strong>rlying the control of bioengineers<br />

on microbial processes, and ultimately on the functioning and<br />

function of benthic ecosystems.<br />

Planar opto<strong>de</strong>s provi<strong>de</strong> access to sediment heterogeneity in two dimensions,<br />

and are very efficient tools to address the relationships between<br />

chemical gradients in sediments and the behaviour of benthic organisms<br />

(figure 2). Oxygen planar opto<strong>de</strong>s, in particular, revealed steep changes<br />

due to the filling of macrofauna burrows with oxygenated water contrasting<br />

with the surrounding sediment pore waters, and the diffusion<br />

through their wall from and to the surrounding sediment (König et al.,<br />

2005; Glud et al., 2005). Similarly, planar opto<strong>de</strong>s revealed unexpected<br />

pH heterogeneity resulting from carbon remineralisation within the sediment.<br />

Steep pH changes were observed across burrow walls, and within<br />

microniches in the sediment (Stahl et al., 2006). For example, the photosynthetic<br />

activity of a small benthic diatom at the sediment surface<br />

was characterised by a remarkable pH increase from 8.0 in the water to<br />

up to 8.6. Today, however, most of these techniques are applied ex situ<br />

in mesocosms and have only been rarely operationally used in situ (Glud<br />

et al., 2005).<br />

Figure 2: A two dimensional image of the oxygen variability at the sediment<br />

water interface showing the irrigation of burrows with oxygenated water by marine<br />

invertebrates. © F. Wenzhöfer and R. Glud.


Part III – Chapter 2 215<br />

Lateral heterogeneity is a major problem when two or more chemical sensors<br />

are nee<strong>de</strong>d to assess a chemical factor from equilibrium calculation.<br />

This is particularly the case <strong>for</strong> assessing total CO 2<br />

(or dissolved inorganic<br />

carbon, DIC) from the in situ measurement of pH and pCO 2<br />

, or the<br />

total sulphi<strong>de</strong> concentration from pH and H 2<br />

S microsensors. A mismatch<br />

between the profiles of different chemical parameters obtained within<br />

several centimetres distance can lead to strong biases in the <strong>de</strong>finition of<br />

the chemical factor of interest (De Beer et al., 2006). The same problem<br />

arises when addressing the constraints exerted on calcifying organisms at<br />

the scale of their microhabitat, which requires to combine the measurement<br />

of pH, pCO 2<br />

and Ca 2+ (Cai and Reimers, 2003). In the heterogeneous<br />

media characterising most benthic habitats, the <strong>de</strong>sign of integrated<br />

in situ probes combining different sensors within a short distance is there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

a critical need. A compromise has to be found, since disturbance<br />

of the environmental gradient increases with the diameter of the probe,<br />

particularly in sediments.<br />

3. Temporal dynamics of benthic ecological processes<br />

3.1. Reactive chemical species and chemical speciation<br />

Aquatic chemical systems are dynamic molecular assemblages, whose<br />

composition and properties are governed by kinetic and thermodynamic<br />

laws (Stumm and Morgan, 1996). The influence of living organisms on<br />

chemical assemblages often results in non-equilibrium states allowing<br />

reactive chemical species to coexist (e.g. O 2<br />

, H 2<br />

S, NH 4+<br />

). These reactive<br />

chemicals can be used as energy sources, but they also constitute potential<br />

stress factors and constrain the ability of organisms to settle and grow.<br />

Quantifying the concentration of reactive chemical species within characteristic<br />

microniches is there<strong>for</strong>e of main relevance to ecological studies.<br />

Conventional colorimetric analytical methods allow the quantification of<br />

total concentrations of elements, sometimes selecting a given redox states<br />

(e.g. Fe II , S -II ), but they are unable to discriminate between reactive <strong>for</strong>ms<br />

even when operated in situ. By using in situ amperometric and potentiometric<br />

microelectro<strong>de</strong>s, it is possible to selectively <strong>de</strong>tect a single reactive<br />

<strong>for</strong>m of a chemical element (see III, 1). In situ voltammetry can further<br />

discriminate different chemical species and has been particularly useful<br />

in distinguishing various sulphi<strong>de</strong>-rich environments in terms of toxicity<br />

and energy availability <strong>for</strong> chemoautotrophs by comparing the respective<br />

contents of free sulphi<strong>de</strong> and of sulphi<strong>de</strong>s complexed with iron (Luther III<br />

et al., 2001a; 2001b). Furthermore, the technique allows to measure other<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms of reduced sulfur, thiosulphates (S 2<br />

O 3<br />

2-<br />

) or polysulphi<strong>de</strong>s (S n<br />

2-<br />

) and


216 Ecosystem properties<br />

can there<strong>for</strong>e assess the importance of these intermediate compounds in<br />

the biological sulphi<strong>de</strong> oxidation (Waite et al., 2008; Gartman et al., 2011).<br />

Colloidal <strong>for</strong>ms of metals are other reactive species playing a significant<br />

role in benthic <strong>ecology</strong> and biogeochemistry. Cyclic voltammetry revealed<br />

that iron sulphi<strong>de</strong> colloids are electrochemically active and can be particularly<br />

abundant in metal rich reducing environments. These labile<br />

macromolecules <strong>de</strong>termine not only sulphi<strong>de</strong> speciation – thus limiting<br />

the toxicity of sulphi<strong>de</strong> – but also iron speciation with significant effects<br />

on its mobility (Rickard and Luther III, 2007). Taillefert et al. (2000a)<br />

showed that soluble Fe(III) colloids <strong>de</strong>tected in sediment pore waters can<br />

have important implications on the mineralisation rate of organic matter.<br />

This highly reactive Fe(III) can diffuse in and out of sediments, supplying<br />

an electron acceptor at locations where particulate iron oxi<strong>de</strong>s are no<br />

more available. In addition, reduction of soluble Fe(III) by sulphi<strong>de</strong> was<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntified as a major removal process <strong>for</strong> toxic sulphi<strong>de</strong> in the sediments<br />

(Preisler et al., 2007).<br />

2.2 Short-term dynamics: from laboratory to natural conditions<br />

Physical and biological factors not only constrain the spatial distribution of<br />

in situ chemical gradients, they also generate substantial temporal variability<br />

that has long been difficult to investigate in benthic ecosystems. Day-night<br />

transitions are of particular ecological relevance. With the help of chemical<br />

sensing techniques, the challenge of capturing light-dark variability was<br />

first tackled from ex situ experiments on sediment cores. Jørgensen et al.<br />

(1983) thus <strong>de</strong>scribed how the interplay of diatoms with photosynthetic<br />

and non-photosynthetic sulphur bacterial communities shaped chemical<br />

gradients over day-night cycles within a benthic microbial mat collected in<br />

a hypersaline lake. Monitoring the oxygen gradients at the sediment interface<br />

in response to light exposure revealed profound <strong>de</strong>viation from oxygen<br />

saturation, due to the activities of benthic phototrophic primary producers<br />

(Revsbech et al., 1986). In a narrow photosynthetic layer – less than a<br />

few millimetres thick – oxygen reached up to three times the atmospheric<br />

saturation level in light conditions, in complete opposition with the steep<br />

oxygen consumption profile in the dark. Daily changes in oxygen within<br />

algae microhabitat with temporary anoxia and hyperoxia were similarly<br />

documented by Pöhn et al. (2001) in artificial light exposure conditions.<br />

<strong>Sensors</strong> have moreover fostered the investigation of the reciprocal relationships<br />

between key bioengineers and chemical factors variation in their<br />

environment. As an example, seagrass beds are known not only <strong>for</strong> their<br />

carbon storage efficiency and the nutritional and sheltering role of their<br />

canopy above the sediment, but also <strong>for</strong> the diurnal control they exert<br />

on biogeochemical processes insi<strong>de</strong> the sediment. Significant light-dark


Part III – Chapter 2 217<br />

changes in microsensor vertical profiles were documented from a series of<br />

sediment cores collected at different times of the day on a seagrass bed, highlighting<br />

the influence of the rhizosphere activity on oxygen profiles and<br />

subsequent biogeochemical processes (Hebert and Morse, 2003; Borum et<br />

al., 2005). The most important ecological consequence of this process is<br />

the reduction of toxic sulphi<strong>de</strong> in the upper layer of the sediment. In<strong>de</strong>ed,<br />

the oxygen released from the roots during the day promotes the oxidation<br />

of sulphi<strong>de</strong>, and protect the plants from toxic sulphi<strong>de</strong> invasion as it was<br />

<strong>de</strong>monstrated by using microsensors in microcosms (Borum et al., 2005).<br />

Using similar microsensors, these authors monitored in situ daily changes<br />

in oxygen and sulphi<strong>de</strong> in healthy patches of seagrass Thalassia testidum<br />

and adjacent areas including die-off patches. These direct measurements<br />

confirmed that, without <strong>de</strong>toxification by oxygen, the sulphi<strong>de</strong> produced<br />

in non-vegetated sediment can reach higher levels and diffuse outward,<br />

further increasing <strong>de</strong>leterious effects on adjacent seagrass beds.<br />

The fast response of amperometric microsensors is particularly well suited<br />

to address temporal variability at even shorter scales. For example, the monitoring<br />

of oxygen use of an microelectro<strong>de</strong> over one hour allowed to resolve<br />

fluctuation in oxygen content from 0 to 80% of the overlying water saturation<br />

within a benthic polychaete burrow in a mesocosm (Kristensen, 2000).<br />

This study highlighted the influence of burrow ventilation by the worm<br />

not only on the burrow habitat itself but also on the surrounding sediment,<br />

through diffusion of oxygen across the burrow wall. Kristensen (2000) also<br />

pointed out the need <strong>for</strong> more experimental testing of the impact of such<br />

burrowing activity, which implicitly called <strong>for</strong> an extension of the use of<br />

microsensors directly in situ as done by Volkenborn et al. (2007). From<br />

2D vi<strong>de</strong>o imaging on sediment cores obtained with planar opto<strong>de</strong>s, these<br />

authors have recently quantified the influence of Arenicola marina, a common<br />

burrowing annelid, on oxygen penetration in sediment through an<br />

ex situ approach. Oxygenated seawater pumping by the worm through its<br />

burrow promotes lateral diffusion of oxygen through burrow walls to the<br />

surrounding sediment. The use of in situ microsensors to compare chemical<br />

gradients between a 400m 2 exclusion zone and a <strong>de</strong>nsely colonized adjacent<br />

area confirmed the influence of this process over large scales, but it also<br />

revealed that burrow irrigation is not the sole influence of these organisms<br />

on oxygen transport rates in the sediment. The combination of local heterogeneities<br />

<strong>for</strong>med by burrow openings and excreted material at the sediment<br />

surface with hydrodynamic <strong>for</strong>cing by currents and waves promoting diffuse<br />

fluxes at the sediment-water interface also appeared as a major control<br />

on oxygen penetration in sediment. This example illustrates well the importance<br />

of in situ studies, in combination to ex situ approaches using sensors.<br />

Another example is provi<strong>de</strong>d by Vopel et al. (2001; 2005), who studied<br />

the two transport mechanisms enabling sulphi<strong>de</strong> and oxygen to be sup-


218 Ecosystem properties<br />

plied to the chemosynthetic bacterial symbionts of Zoothamnium niveum, a<br />

colonial ciliate typically found in mangrove peat sulphidic habitats. Using<br />

microsensors in aquarium, these authors <strong>de</strong>scribed how the contraction and<br />

extension of the ciliate stalk enhanced advective transport of alternatively<br />

sulphi<strong>de</strong> and oxygen over durations a few seconds (Vopel et al., 2001). In<br />

situ measurements on mangrove rootlets colonized by these ciliates, further<br />

documented the capacity of this symbiosis to exploit natural hydrodynamics.<br />

In high flow conditions, boundary-layer modulations over <strong>de</strong>grading<br />

peat results in fluctuating sulphi<strong>de</strong> and oxygen concentrations over ciliate<br />

groups, whereas in quiescent periods advective transport generated by the<br />

ciliate is nee<strong>de</strong>d <strong>for</strong> the supply of these compounds to the symbionts.<br />

Most continuous in situ monitoring studies remained limited to very shallow<br />

environments, like salt marshes or mangrove swamp, where the use of<br />

in situ sensors is facilitated because electronics can be maintained out of<br />

the water and only the electro<strong>de</strong> is immersed and can be positioned by an<br />

operator (Taillefert, 2000b; Vopel et al., 2005) Today, however, un<strong>de</strong>rwater<br />

sensing <strong>de</strong>vices allowing autonomous <strong>de</strong>ployments are becoming available<br />

<strong>for</strong> a variety of environmental conditions, including remote <strong>de</strong>ep-sea conditions<br />

(III, 1),. As far as tracers of ecological processes are concerned, the<br />

need <strong>for</strong> highly accurate and precise measurements may be balanced by the<br />

benefits gained from the characterisation of temporal changes. The study of<br />

wood <strong>de</strong>gradation and colonisation in tropical shallow waters provi<strong>de</strong>d an<br />

illustration of the advantages of continuous autonomous monitoring over<br />

durations exceeding a few hours. Large sulphi<strong>de</strong> and pH variation on the<br />

surface of a natural wood fall in a mangrove swamp were <strong>de</strong>termined over<br />

almost three days in correlation with ti<strong>de</strong> (figure 3 and Laurent et al., 2009).<br />

The succession of high sulphi<strong>de</strong> and low pH periods with low sulphi<strong>de</strong><br />

and higher pH periods was attributed to the influence of tidal currents<br />

on local hydrodynamics. This study emphasized the need <strong>for</strong> continuous<br />

measurement series over several days capturing tidal fluctuation in or<strong>de</strong>r<br />

to fully <strong>de</strong>scribe habitat redox conditions. Similar wi<strong>de</strong> temporal fluctuations<br />

partly attributed to the <strong>for</strong>cing of tidal current on vent fluid mixing<br />

have been recently highlighted from the use of autonomous voltammetric<br />

and potentiometric sensing <strong>de</strong>vice <strong>de</strong>ployed over days to weeks in <strong>de</strong>ep-sea<br />

hydrothermal vent habitats (Luther III et al., 2008; Contreira et al., 2011).<br />

The availability of fully autonomous systems that can be operated unatten<strong>de</strong>d<br />

over longer periods will enlarge the capacity to tackle the transient<br />

dynamics of ecological processes directly in situ in the future. With the<br />

objectives of documenting the dynamics of establishment of sulphidic conditions<br />

suitable <strong>for</strong> chemoautotrophy on organic falls, pioneer works have<br />

just explored the capacity to per<strong>for</strong>m continuous chemical monitoring on<br />

experimentally immersed organic substrates over duration exceeding two<br />

months (figure 4 and Le Bris et al. submitted; Yücel et al., submitted).


Part III – Chapter 2 219<br />

Figure 3: Fluctuation of sulphi<strong>de</strong> (A) and pH (b) at the surface of a woody substrate<br />

naturally immersed in a tropical mangrove swamp as measured with sulphi<strong>de</strong><br />

(green signal) and pH sensors (red signal). The ti<strong>de</strong> is represented by the blue curve<br />

(adapted from Laurent et al., 2009).


220 Ecosystem properties<br />

Figure 4: Autonomous sulphi<strong>de</strong> and pH sensors used <strong>for</strong> an experimental study of<br />

the <strong>de</strong>gradation and colonisation of woody <strong>de</strong>bris over three months in a mangrove<br />

swamp. The electro<strong>de</strong> tips are attached to the surface (green arrow) and inserted<br />

(red arrow) into a piece of Coco nuciphera (© o. Gros UAG).<br />

4. Conclusion<br />

In situ chemical sensing supported a significant step <strong>for</strong>ward in the<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of the interaction of microbial consortia and macrofaunal<br />

assemblages in marine benthic habitats, as well as their role in the spatial<br />

and temporal dynamics of chemical gradients. Processes governing nutrient<br />

recycling, organic matter trans<strong>for</strong>mation and energy transfer, environmental<br />

toxicity, and the resulting chemical constraints on biological<br />

diversity are important ecological issues that have been addressed by using<br />

chemical sensors. These tools hold great promises <strong>for</strong> the investigation<br />

of marine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning relationships, whose<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. Modularity, robustness,<br />

small size, and cost effectiveness of sensors largely improved, which<br />

maximised their capacity to be implemented as part of in situ experimental<br />

<strong>de</strong>signs. Analogous to the miniaturised modules that equip Mars lan<strong>de</strong>rs<br />

(Kounaves et al., 2010), new generations of integrated and autonomous<br />

sensing <strong>de</strong>vices are to be <strong>de</strong>veloped by combining different techniques<br />

to access the full range of relevant parameters <strong>for</strong> specific questions.<br />

Exchange of knowledge and technical expertise between soil and terrestrial<br />

aquatic sciences and marine benthic <strong>ecology</strong> will undoubtedly foster<br />

these <strong>de</strong>velopment ef<strong>for</strong>ts.


Part III – Chapter 2 221<br />

Authors’ references<br />

Nadine Le Bris, Leonardo Contreira-Pereira, Mustafa Yücel:<br />

Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Laboratoire d’écogéochimie <strong>de</strong>s environnements<br />

benthiques, CNRS-UPMC FRE3350, observatoire océanologique,<br />

Banyuls-sur-Mer, France.<br />

Corresponding author: Nadine Le Bris, lebris@obs-banyuls.fr<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

This review was supported by UPMC, CNRS, the TOTAL foundation<br />

and the European Commission, within the SENSEnet ITN network<br />

(International sensor <strong>de</strong>velopment network GA 237868). The TOTAL<br />

foundation supports the post-doctoral grant of Mustafa Yücel, as part<br />

of the Chair “Extreme marine environments, biodiversity, and global<br />

change”.<br />

References<br />

Bertic V. J., Ziebis W., 2009. Biodiversity of benthic microbial communities in<br />

bioturbated coastal sediments is controlled by geochemical microniches.<br />

The ISME Journal, 3, pp. 1269-1285.<br />

Borum J., Pe<strong>de</strong>rsen O., Greve T. M., Frankovich T. A., Zieman J. C., Fourqurean<br />

J. W., Mad<strong>de</strong>n C. J., 2005. The potential role of plant oxygen and sulfi<strong>de</strong><br />

dynamics in die-off events of the tropical seagrass, Thalassia testudinum.<br />

Journal of Ecology, 93, pp. 148-158.<br />

Bren<strong>de</strong>l P., Luther III G. W., 1995. Development of a gold amalgam voltammetric<br />

microelectro<strong>de</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>de</strong>termination of dissolved Fe, Mn, O 2<br />

and S(-II) in<br />

porewaters of marine and freshwater sediments. Environmental Science<br />

and Technology, 29, pp. 751-761.<br />

Cai W. J., Reimers C. E., 2003. <strong>Sensors</strong> <strong>for</strong> pH and pCO 2<br />

measurements in<br />

seawater and at the sediment-water interface, in: Buffle J. and Horvai G.<br />

(Eds), In situ monitoring in aquatic systems. IUPAC series on Analytical<br />

and Physical Chemistry of Environmental Systems, 6, pp. 75-119.<br />

Contreira L., Yücel M., Brulport J.-P., Comtat M., Le Bris N., 2011. Comparative<br />

assesment of potentiometric and voltammetric sensors <strong>for</strong> autonomous<br />

monitoring in <strong>de</strong>ep sea sulfidic environments. Geophysical Research<br />

Abstracts, 13, EGU2011-7765.<br />

De Beer D., Sauter E., Niemann H., Kaul N., Witte U., Foucher J.-P., Schluter<br />

M., Boetius A., 2006. In situ fluxes and zonation of microbial activity in


222 Ecosystem properties<br />

surface sediments of the Haakon Mosby mud volcano. Limnology and<br />

Oceanography, 51, pp. 1315-1331.<br />

Gartman A., Yücel M., Madison A. S., Chu D. W., Ma S., Janzen C., Becker<br />

E. L., Beinart R. A., Girguis P. R., Luther III G. W., 2011. Sulfi<strong>de</strong> oxidation<br />

across diffuse flow zones of hydrothermal vents. Aquatic Geochemistry,<br />

17, pp. 583-601.<br />

Glazer B. T., Luther III G. W., Konovalov S. K., Frie<strong>de</strong>rich G. G., Nuzzio D. B.,<br />

Trouwborst R. E., Tebo B. M., Clement B., Murray K., Romanov A. S.,<br />

2006 Documenting the suboxic zone of the Black Sea via high-resolution<br />

real time redox profiling. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in<br />

Oceanography, 53, pp. 1740-1755.<br />

Glazer B. T., Rouxel, O. J., 2009. Redox speciation and distribution within diverse<br />

iron-dominated microbial habitats at Loihi Seamount. Geomicrobiology<br />

Journal, 26, pp. 606-622.<br />

Glud R. N., Wenzhöfer F., Tengberg A., Mid<strong>de</strong>lbo M., Oguri K., Kitazato<br />

H., 2005. Distribution of oxygen in surface sediments from central<br />

Sagami Bay, Japan: in situ measurements by microelectro<strong>de</strong>s and planar<br />

opto<strong>de</strong>s. Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 52,<br />

pp. 1974–1987.<br />

Grünke S., Fel<strong>de</strong>n J., Lichtschlag A., Girnth A.-C. De Beer D., Wenzhöfer<br />

F., Boetius A., 2011. Niche differentiation among mat-<strong>for</strong>ming, sulfi<strong>de</strong>oxidizing<br />

bacteria at cold seeps of the Nile Deep Sea Fan (Eastern<br />

Mediterranean Sea). Geobiology, 9, pp. 330-348.<br />

Gun<strong>de</strong>rsen J. K., Jørgensen B. B., Larsen E., Jannasch H. W., 1992. Mats of giant<br />

sulphur bacteria on <strong>de</strong>ep-sea sediments due to fluctuating hydrothermal<br />

flow. Nature, 360, pp. 454-456.<br />

Hebert A. B., Morse J. W., 2003. Microscale effect of light on H 2<br />

S and Fe2+<br />

in vegetated (Zoostera marina) sediments. Marine Chemistry, 81, pp. 1-9.<br />

Johnson K. S., Childress J. J., Hessler R. R., Sakamoto-Arnold C. M., Beelher<br />

C. L., 1988. Chemical and biological interactions in the Rose Gar<strong>de</strong>n<br />

hydrothermal vent field, Galapagos spreading center. Deep-Sea Research<br />

Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 35, pp. 1723-1744.<br />

Johnson K. S., Childress J. J., Beelher C. L., Sakamoto-Arnold C. M., 1994.<br />

Biogeochemistry of hydrothermal vent mussel communities: the <strong>de</strong>ep sea<br />

analogue to the intertidal zone. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic<br />

Research Papers, 41, pp. 993-1011.<br />

Jörgensen B. B., Revsbech N. P., 1983. Photosynthesis and structure of benthic<br />

microbial mats: microelectro<strong>de</strong> and SEM studies of four cyanobacterial<br />

communities. Limnology and Oceanography, 28, pp. 1075-1093.<br />

König B., Kohls O., Holst G., Glud R. N., Kühl M., 2005. Fabrication and<br />

test of sol-gel based planar oxygen opto<strong>de</strong>s <strong>for</strong> use in aquatic sediments.<br />

Marine Chemistry, 97, pp. 262-276.<br />

Kounaves S. P., Hecht M. H., Kapit J., Gospodinova K., DeFlores L., Quinn<br />

R. C., boynton W. V., Clark b. C., Catling D. C., Hredzak P., Ming D.


Part III – Chapter 2 223<br />

W., Moore Q., Shusterman J., Stroble S., West S. J., young S. M. M., 2010.<br />

Wet chemistry experiments on the 2007 Phoenix Mars Scout Lan<strong>de</strong>r<br />

mission: Data analysis and results. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115,<br />

pp. 1-10.<br />

Kristensen E. 2000. Organic matter diagenesis at the oxic/anoxic interface in<br />

coastal marine sediments, with emphasis on the role of burrowing animals.<br />

Hydrobiologia, 426, pp. 1-24.<br />

Laurent M. C. Z., Gros O., Brulport J.-P., Gaill F., Le Bris N., 2009. Sunken<br />

wood habitat <strong>for</strong> thiotrophic symbiosis in mangrove swamps. Marine<br />

Environmental Research, 67, pp. 83-88.<br />

Le Bris N., Sarradin P.-M., Birot D., Alayse-Danet A.-M., 2000. A new<br />

chemical analyzer <strong>for</strong> in situ measurement of nitrate and total sulfi<strong>de</strong><br />

over hydrothermal vent biological communities. Marine Chemistry, 72,<br />

pp. 1-15.<br />

Le Bris N., Sarradin P.-M., Caprais J.-C., 2003. Contrasted sulphi<strong>de</strong> chemistries<br />

in the environment of 13°N EPR vent fauna. Deep Sea Research Part I:<br />

Oceanographic Research Papers, 50, pp. 737-747.<br />

Le Bris N., Zbin<strong>de</strong>n M., Gaill F., 2005. Processes controlling the physicochemical<br />

micro-environments associated with Pompeii worms. Deep Sea<br />

Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 52, pp. 1071-1083.<br />

Le Bris N., Govenar B., Le Gall C., Fisher C. R., 2006. Variability of physicochemical<br />

conditions in 9°N EPR diffuse flow vent habitats. Marine<br />

Chemistry, 98, pp. 167-182.<br />

Le Bris N, Yücel M, Laurent M, Gros O. Submitted. Dynamics of sulfur redox<br />

cycling from <strong>de</strong>grading wood in a tropical marine environment.<br />

Luther III G. W., Rozan T. F., Taillefert M., Nuzzio D. B., Di Meo, C.,<br />

Shank T. M., Lutz R. A., Cary S. C., 2001a. Chemical speciation drives<br />

hydrothermal vent <strong>ecology</strong>. Nature, 410, pp. 813-816.<br />

Luther III G. W., Glazer B. T., Hohmann L., Popp. J. I., Taillefert M.,<br />

Tozan T. F., Bren<strong>de</strong>l P. J., Theberge S. M., Nuzzio D. B., 2001b. Sulfur<br />

speciation monitored in situ with solid state gold amalgam voltammetric<br />

microelectro<strong>de</strong>s: polysulfi<strong>de</strong>s as a special case in sediments, microbial mats<br />

and hydrothermal vent waters. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 3,<br />

pp. 61-66.<br />

Luther III G. W., Glazer B. T., Ma S., Trouwborst R. E., Moore T. S., Metzger E.,<br />

Kraiya C., Waite T. J., Druschel G., Sundby B., Taillefert M., Nuzzio D. B.,<br />

Shank T. M., Lewis B. L., Bren<strong>de</strong>l P. J., 2008. Use of voltammetric solidstate<br />

(micro)electro<strong>de</strong>s <strong>for</strong> studying biogeochemical processes: laboratory<br />

measurements to real time measurements with an in situ electrochemical<br />

analyzer (ISEA). Marine Chemistry, 108, pp. 221-235.<br />

Nieman H., Lösekann T., De Beer D., Elvert M., Nadalig T., Knittel K., Amann<br />

R., Sauter E. J., Schlüter M., Klages M., Foucher J. P., Boetius A., 2006.<br />

Novel microbial communities of the Haakon Mosby mud volcano and<br />

their role as a methane sink. Nature, 443, pp. 854-858.


224 Ecosystem properties<br />

Podowski E. L., Ma S., Luther III G.W., Wardrop D., Fisher C. R., 2010. Biotic<br />

and abiotic factors affecting realized distributions of mega-fauna in diffuse<br />

flow on an<strong>de</strong>site and basalt along the Eastern Lau Spreading Center,<br />

Tonga. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 418, pp. 25-45.<br />

Pöhn M., Vopel K., Grünberger E., Ott J., 2001. Microclimate of the brown alga<br />

Feldmannia caespitula interstitium un<strong>de</strong>r zero-flow conditions. Marine<br />

Ecology Progress Series, 210, pp. 285-290.<br />

Preisler A., De Beer D., Litchschlag A., Lavik G., Boetius A., Jørgensen B. B.,<br />

2007. Biological and chemical sulfi<strong>de</strong> oxidation in Beggiatoa inhabited<br />

marine sediment. The ISME Journal, 1, pp. 341-353.<br />

Revsbech N. P., Jørgensen B. B., Blackburn T. H., Cohen Y., 1983. Microelectro<strong>de</strong><br />

studies of the photosynthesis and O 2<br />

, H 2<br />

S and pH profiles of a microbial<br />

mat. Limnology and Oceanography, 28, pp. 1062-1074.<br />

Revsbech N. P., Madsen B., Jørgensen B. B., 1986. Oxygen production and<br />

consumption in sediments <strong>de</strong>termined at high spatial resolution by<br />

computer simulation of oxygen microelectro<strong>de</strong> data. Limnology and<br />

Oceanography, 31, pp. 293-304.<br />

Rickard D., Luther III G.W., 2007. Chemistry of iron sulfi<strong>de</strong>s. Chemical<br />

Reviews, 107, pp. 514-562.<br />

Sarrazin J., Juniper S. K., Massoth G., Legendre P., 1999. Physical and chemical<br />

factors influencing species distribution on hydrothermal sulfi<strong>de</strong> edifices<br />

of the Juan <strong>de</strong> Fuca Ridge, northeast Pacific. Marine Ecology Progress<br />

Series, 190, pp. 89-112.<br />

Schulz H. D., Zabel M. (Eds), 2006. Marine Geochemistry, 2nd edition.<br />

Springer Berlin Hei<strong>de</strong>lberg, New York, USA.<br />

Stahl H., Glud A., Schrö<strong>de</strong>r C. R., Klimant I., Tengberg A. Glud R. N., 2006.<br />

Time-resolved pH imaging in marine sediments with a luminescent planar<br />

opto<strong>de</strong>. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 4, pp. 336-345.<br />

Stockdale A., Davison W., Zhang H., 2009. Micro-scale biogeochemical<br />

heterogeneity in sediments: A review of available technology and observed<br />

evi<strong>de</strong>nce. Earth-Science Reviews, 92, pp. 81-97.<br />

Stumm W., Morgan J. J., 1996. Aquatic Chemistry, 3rd edition. Wiley, New<br />

York, USA.<br />

Taillefert M., bono A. b., Luther III G. W., 2000a. Reactivity of freshly<br />

<strong>for</strong>med Fe(III) in synthetic solutions and (pore)waters: voltammetric<br />

evi<strong>de</strong>nce of an aging process. Environmental Science and Technology,<br />

34, pp. 2169-2177.<br />

Taillefert M., Luther III G. W., Nuzzio D. B., 2000b. The application of<br />

electrochemical tools <strong>for</strong> in situ measurements in aquatic systems: a review.<br />

Electroanalysis, 12, pp. 401-412.<br />

Treu<strong>de</strong> T., Smith C. R., Wenzhoefer F., Carney E., Bernardino A. F., Hanni<strong>de</strong>s<br />

A. K., Kruger M., Boetius A., 2009. Biogeochemistry of a <strong>de</strong>ep-sea whale<br />

fall: sulfate reduction, sulfi<strong>de</strong> efflux and methanogenesis. Marine Ecology<br />

Progress Series, 382, pp. 1-21.


Part III – Chapter 2 225<br />

Volkenborn N., Polerecky L., Hedtkamp S. I. C., Van Beusekom J. E. E., De<br />

Beer D., 2007. Bioturbation and bioirrigation extend the open exchange<br />

regions in permeable sediments. Limnology and Oceanography, 52,<br />

pp. 1898-1909.<br />

Vopel K., Pöhn M., Sorgo A., Ott J., 2001. Ciliate-generated advective seawater<br />

transport supplies chemoautotrophic ectosymbionts. Marine Ecology<br />

Progress Series, 210, pp. 93-99.<br />

Vopel K., Thistle D., Ott J., Bright M., Roy H., 2005. Wave-induced H 2<br />

S flux<br />

sustains a chemoautotrophic symbiosis. Limnology and Oceanography,<br />

50, pp. 128-133<br />

Waite T. J., Moore T. S., Childress J. J., Hsu-Kim H., Mullaugh K. M., Nuzzio D.<br />

B., Paschal A. N., Tsang J., Fisher C. R., Luther III G. W., 2008. Variation<br />

in sulfur speciation with shellfish presence at a Lau Basin diffuse flow vent<br />

site. Journal of Shellfish Research, 27, pp. 163-168.<br />

Wenzhöfer F., Holby O., Glud R. N., Nielsen H. K., Gun<strong>de</strong>rsen J. K., 2000. In<br />

situ microsensor studies of a shallow water hydrothermal vent at Milos,<br />

Greece. Marine Chemistry, 69, pp. 43-54.<br />

Yücel M., Galand P. E., FagervoldS. K., Le Bris N. Submitted. Transition<br />

from suboxic to sulfidic conditions during early wood-fall <strong>de</strong>gradation in<br />

seawater.


Chapter 3<br />

Use of global satellite observations<br />

to collect in<strong>for</strong>mation in marine<br />

<strong>ecology</strong><br />

Séverine Alvain, Vincent Vantrepotte, Julia Uitz, Lucile Du<strong>for</strong>êt-Gaurier<br />

1. Introduction: ocean colour features, a state of the art<br />

The term “ocean colour” encompasses the retrieval and <strong>de</strong>scription of<br />

parameters linked with oceanic phytoplankton from optical measurements.<br />

The remote sensing of ocean colours has been used <strong>for</strong> more than<br />

30 years and now provi<strong>de</strong>s key in<strong>for</strong>mation on the dynamics of the oceanic<br />

phytoplankton (Morel and Prieur, 1977; Mobley et al., 1993; Antoine<br />

et al., 1996; bricaud et al., 1998; Loisel et al., 2006). Phytoplankton comprises<br />

microscopic plant-like organisms living in the illuminated surface<br />

layers of the ocean. The existence of phytoplankton is of a fundamental<br />

interest as they <strong>for</strong>m the base of the aquatic food webs, providing an<br />

essential ecological function <strong>for</strong> all aquatic life. Like terrestrial plants,<br />

phytoplankton uses pigment antennae to capture the energy of photons.<br />

Among these phytoplankton pigments, total chlorophyll-a (i.e. the<br />

sum of chlorophyll-a, divinyl-chlorophyll-a, and chlorophylli<strong>de</strong> a) is a<br />

commonly used proxy of total phytoplankton biomass. Chlorophyll-a<br />

selectively modifies the flux of photons that penetrates the ocean surface<br />

layer. It absorbs the red and blue wavelengths and scatters the green<br />

ones. For this reason, the colour of the ocean changes from blue to green<br />

<strong>de</strong>pending on the concentration and type of phytoplankton populations.<br />

Thus, by studying the colour of light scattered from the oceans, in other<br />

words ocean colour, optical sensors onboard satellites enable to quantify<br />

the chlorophyll concentration and observe its interactions with other<br />

constituents (Mobley et al., 1993; Antoine et al., 1996; bricaud et al.,<br />

1998).


228 Ecosystem properties<br />

Visible and near-infrared passive radiometers onboard spacecrafts<br />

provi<strong>de</strong> useful data on spatial and temporal scales, unattainable by<br />

shipboard sampling. This was well <strong>de</strong>monstrated by the first satellite<br />

<strong>de</strong>dicated to the observation of ocean colour, the coastal zone colour<br />

scanner (CZCS) launched in 1978. Since then, a number of advanced<br />

ocean-colour satellites have been launched, including SeaWiFS (sea<br />

viewing wi<strong>de</strong> field of view sensor, from August 1997 to December 2010),<br />

Modis (mo<strong>de</strong>rate resolution imaging spectroradiometer) and Meris<br />

(medium-spectral resolution imaging spectrometer), which are still in<br />

activity. However, the ocean colour observation from space faces some<br />

important limitations. In<strong>de</strong>ed, the in<strong>for</strong>mation obtained from satellite<br />

observation is restricted to the near-surface layer of the ocean (Gordon<br />

and McCluney, 1975). The thickness of this layer typically varies from<br />

a few metres to about 60m, <strong>de</strong>pending on the presence of optically-significant<br />

constituents in the water and the wavelength consi<strong>de</strong>red (Smith<br />

and baker, 1978). Products <strong>de</strong>rived from satellite data are there<strong>for</strong>e integrated<br />

content over the first penetration <strong>de</strong>pth. Another limitation is<br />

that a large part ocean colour measurements in the visible spectrum is<br />

caused by the atmosphere and aerosols that diffuse and absorb light.<br />

The atmosphere is responsible <strong>for</strong> about 90% of the blue light <strong>de</strong>tected<br />

by a satellite sensor. However, the portion of the signal that carries in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

from the ocean and the atmosphere can be <strong>de</strong>-convoluted. This<br />

is currently done by using atmospheric correction algorithms that are<br />

still being improved. In the past few years, the analysis of ocean colour<br />

satellite data has moved beyond the estimation of chlorophyll-a concentration<br />

to inclu<strong>de</strong> new parameters. This inclu<strong>de</strong>s the ability to <strong>de</strong>termine<br />

the dominant phytoplankton groups in the surface waters (Aiken<br />

et al., 2009; Alvain et al., 2005: Uitz et al., 2006; Raitsos et al., 2008;<br />

Kostadinov et al., 2009; Brewin et al., 2010), to obtain in<strong>for</strong>mation on<br />

particle size distribution (Loisel et al., 2006), or to retrieve in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

about other biogeochemical components such as particulate organic carbon<br />

(POC) and coloured <strong>de</strong>trital matter (Stramski et al., 1999; Loisel<br />

et al., 2002; Siegel et al., 2002). This chapter presents an overview of<br />

these newly available parameters from remote sensing of ocean colour.<br />

We conclu<strong>de</strong> by a synthesis of most important challenges and ongoing<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopments.


Part III – Chapter 3 229<br />

2. Overview of newly available parameters<br />

from remote sensing<br />

2.1. Particulate organic carbon<br />

Inherent optical properties (IOPs) <strong>de</strong>scribe the absorption and scattering<br />

properties of ocean water and its constituents. A recent method to<br />

analyse remote sensing data consists in <strong>de</strong>riving the surface content of<br />

particulate organic carbon (POC surf<br />

) from the inherent optical properties,<br />

as presented in Loisel et al. (2002). The natural variations of opticallysignificant<br />

substances in seawater can be <strong>de</strong>duced from the measurements<br />

of the total backscattering coefficient of seawater, b b<br />

, which is not sensitive<br />

to the presence of dissolved material. The b b<br />

coefficient can be partitioned<br />

into two components,<br />

b b<br />

=b bp<br />

+b bw<br />

where b bw<br />

is the backscattering coefficient of seawater (Morel and Prieur,<br />

1977) and b bp<br />

, is the backscattering coefficient of particles. The b bp<br />

variability<br />

is <strong>de</strong>termined primarily by changes in the abundance of the particle<br />

assemblage and also, secondarily, by the composition of the assemblage.<br />

In a remote-sensing context, the backscattering coefficient of seawater<br />

is not measured directly, but is <strong>de</strong>rived by the inversion of the natural<br />

light field reflected back from the ocean and <strong>de</strong>tected by satellite<br />

ocean colour sensors (Loisel and Stramski, 2000; Loisel and Poteau,<br />

2006). A simple linear relationship calibrated <strong>for</strong> a study area is then<br />

used between POC surf<br />

and b bp<br />

(Claustre et al., 1999; Loisel et al., 2001).<br />

Previous studies at regional (Stramski et al., 1999; Loisel et al., 2001)<br />

and global scales (Loisel et al., 2002) have <strong>de</strong>monstrated the feasibility<br />

of estimating POC from b bp<br />

, and figure 1 displays global maps of the<br />

near-surface concentration (POC surf<br />

) <strong>for</strong> the SeaWiFS period 1997-2008<br />

in June and January.<br />

The global distribution of POC surf<br />

follows the major gyre system and<br />

other large scale circulation features of the ocean. Low surface POC<br />

concentrations are encountered in subtropical gyres, where large scale<br />

downwelling is expected. For example, POC surf<br />

is less than 50mg.m -3 in<br />

the South Pacific gyre. Elevated near-surface POC concentration in the<br />

range 100-200mg.m -3 are encountered at high and temperate latitu<strong>de</strong>s<br />

(e.g. Antarctic circumpolar current, subarctic gyres, or temperate North<br />

Atlantic). Compared to subtropical gyres, these areas are characterized<br />

by a high chlorophyll concentration supported by inputs of nutrients<br />

injected from below the euphotic layer by advection or vertical mixing, or<br />

from terrestrial sources.


230 Ecosystem properties<br />

Figure 1: Global maps of the particulate organic plankton near-surface concentration<br />

calculated from SeaWiFS observations, during the period 1997-2008 in June and<br />

January using the method of Loisel et al. (2002).<br />

2.2. Phytoplankton functional types<br />

Phytoplankton plays an important role in many global biogeochemical<br />

cycles. However, the photosynthetic efficiency and biogeochemical<br />

impacts of phytoplankton <strong>de</strong>pend strongly on the functional types of<br />

phytoplankton species. Thus, monitoring the spatial and temporal distribution<br />

of dominant phytoplankton functional groups is of critical importance.<br />

For a given chlorophyll-a concentration (Chl-a), phytoplankton<br />

groups scatter and absorb light differently according to their pigments<br />

composition, shape and size. However, the first or<strong>de</strong>r signal retrieved from<br />

ocean colour sensors in open oceans, the normalized water leaving radiance<br />

(nL w<br />

), varies with Chl-a (Gordon et al., 1983; Morel et al., 1988) and<br />

cannot be easily used to extract in<strong>for</strong>mation about phytoplankton groups


Part III – Chapter 3 231<br />

present in the oceanic surface layer. To circumvent this difficulty, different<br />

approaches have been <strong>de</strong>veloped in the past few years. When changes<br />

in nL w<br />

are significant enough between phytoplankton groups, they can be<br />

<strong>de</strong>tected from their specific radiances measurements (Sathyendranath et<br />

al., 2004; Ciotti et al., 2006). When reflectance changes are not significant<br />

enough to separate one group from another, empirical or semi-empirical<br />

methods have to be <strong>de</strong>veloped. This last case is particularly relevant<br />

when the objective is to <strong>de</strong>tect phytoplankton groups <strong>de</strong>fined from a biogeochemical<br />

or size point of view at global scale. The Physat algorithm<br />

(Alvain et al., 2005; Alvain et al., 2008) has been <strong>de</strong>veloped based on an<br />

empirical relationship between coinci<strong>de</strong>nt in situ phytoplankton observations<br />

and remote sensing measurements anomalies. The Physat method<br />

has been applied to the SeaWiFS satellite archive, and more recently to<br />

MODIS. Monthly Physat data have been used to retrieve the monthly<br />

climatology maps <strong>for</strong> January and June, shown in figure 2.<br />

Figure 2: Dominant phytoplankton groups climatology maps over 1997-2008<br />

period (SeaWiFS), from Physat, <strong>for</strong> June and January. Physat method allows to<br />

separate dominant phytoplankton groups from remote sensing measurements.


232 Ecosystem properties<br />

Physat has a domain of applicability ranging from concentrations of Chl-a<br />

higher than 0.04mg m -3 , so as to discard ultra-oligotrophic waters where<br />

it is unlikely that a dominant group can be found using ocean-colour<br />

data, to Chl-a lower than 3mg.m -3 so that waters possibly contaminated<br />

by coastal material are exclu<strong>de</strong>d. The Physat approach is based on the<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntification of specific signatures in spectra classically measured by<br />

ocean colour sensors. It has been established by comparing two kinds of<br />

simultaneous and coinci<strong>de</strong>nt measurements: normalised SeaWiFS water<br />

leaving measurements (nL w<br />

) and in situ measurements of phytoplankton<br />

biomarker pigments per<strong>for</strong>med in the framework of the Gep&Co program<br />

(Dandonneau et al., 2004). Five dominant phytoplankton groups are currently<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntified: diatoms, nanoeukaryotes, Synechococcus, Prochlorococcus<br />

and Phaeocystis-like. Note that the Physat method allows the <strong>de</strong>tection of<br />

these groups only when they are dominant.<br />

The key step in the success of methods such as Physat is to associate in situ<br />

measurements with remote sensing measurements after having removed<br />

the first or<strong>de</strong>r variations due to the Chl-a concentration and classically<br />

used in previous ocean colour products. This step is done by dividing the<br />

actual nL w<br />

by a mean nL w<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>l (nL w<br />

ref) <strong>for</strong> each wavelength (λ), established<br />

from a large remote sensing dataset of nL w<br />

(λ) and Chl-a:<br />

nL w<br />

*(λ) = nL w<br />

(λ) / nL w<br />

ref(λ, Chl a)<br />

By dividing nL w<br />

by this reference, we obtain a new product, noted nL w<br />

*,<br />

which is used in Physat. In<strong>de</strong>ed, it was shown that main dominant phytoplankton<br />

groups sampled during the GeP&Co program were associated<br />

with a specific nL w<br />

* spectrum. It is thus possible to <strong>de</strong>fine a set of criteria<br />

to characterise each group as a function of its nL w<br />

* spectrum. These<br />

criteria can thus be applied to the global daily SeaWiFS archive in or<strong>de</strong>r<br />

to obtain global monthly maps synthesis of the most frequently <strong>de</strong>tected<br />

dominant group, as shown in figure 2. Note that when no group prevails<br />

over the period of one month, the pixels are associated with an “uni<strong>de</strong>ntified”<br />

group. The geographical distribution and seasonal succession<br />

of major dominant phytoplankton groups were studied in Alvain et al.<br />

(2008) and are in good agreement with previous studies and in situ observations<br />

(Zubkov et al., 2000; DuRand et al., 2001; Marty and Chivérini,<br />

2002; Dandonneau et al., 2004; Longhurst, 2007; Alvain et al., 2008).<br />

However, as <strong>for</strong> all empirical ocean colour methodology, validation based<br />

on in situ measurements has to be pursued every time a suitable dataset<br />

is available. In situ observations are indispensable in any stage of satellite<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment. There<strong>for</strong>e, constructing and maintaining fully consistent<br />

coupled biogeochemical and optical records is a high priority.


Part III – Chapter 3 233<br />

2.3. Phytoplankton size classes and associated primary production<br />

Another approach to discriminating phytoplankton groups from space<br />

consists in using the surface Chl-a concentration (Chl-a surf<br />

) retrieved from<br />

ocean colour measurements as an in<strong>de</strong>x of phytoplankton community<br />

composition. Chlorophyll-based approaches typically rely on the general<br />

knowledge that, in open oceans, large phytoplankton cells (mostly diatoms)<br />

<strong>de</strong>velop in eutrophic regions (e.g. upwelling systems) where new<br />

nutrients are available, whereas small phytoplankton are preferentially<br />

associated with the presence of regenerated <strong>for</strong>ms of nutrients and dominate<br />

phytoplankton assemblage in oligotrophic environments. On the<br />

basis of such trends, Uitz et al. (2006) proposed a method <strong>for</strong> <strong>de</strong>riving the<br />

contributions of three pigment-based size classes (micro-, nano-, and picophytoplankton)<br />

to <strong>de</strong>pth-resolved chlorophyll-a biomass using Chl-a surf<br />

as<br />

input parameter. This method was <strong>de</strong>veloped through the statistical analysis<br />

of an extensive phytoplankton pigment database (2419 sampling stations)<br />

obtained from high per<strong>for</strong>mance liquid chromatography (HPLC)<br />

analysis of samples from a variety of oceanic regions. Using an improved<br />

version of the diagnostic pigment criteria of Vidussi et al. (2001), Uitz et<br />

al. (2006) computed phytoplankton class-specific vertical profiles of Chl-a<br />

<strong>for</strong> each station inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the pigment database, from which the <strong>de</strong>sired<br />

statistical relationships were established. Essentially, seven pigments were<br />

selected as biomarkers of specific taxa, which were then assigned to one of<br />

the three size classes according to the average size of the organisms.<br />

Some limitations of this method were recognised in the past (Vidussi et al.,<br />

2001; Uitz et al., 2006). For example, certain diagnostic pigments are shared<br />

by various phytoplankton taxa and some taxa may have a wi<strong>de</strong> range of cell<br />

size. yet, this method enables characterising the taxonomic composition of<br />

the entire phytoplankton assemblage while providing relevant in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

on its size structure (Bricaud et al., 2004). For example, microphytoplankton<br />

essentially inclu<strong>de</strong> diatoms, nanophytoplankton inclu<strong>de</strong> primarily<br />

prymnesiophytes, and picophytoplankton are often prokaryotes (cyanobacteria)<br />

and small eukaryotic species. The approach of Uitz et al. (2006)<br />

provi<strong>de</strong>s quantitative in<strong>for</strong>mation on the composition of phytoplankton<br />

community within the entire upper water column rather than just the surface<br />

layer accessible to ocean colour satellites. In addition, this approach can<br />

be exten<strong>de</strong>d to the estimation of primary production associated with the<br />

pigment-based size classes, using a bio-optical mo<strong>de</strong>l (Morel, 1991) coupled<br />

to class-specific photo-physiological properties (Uitz et al., 2008). In a nutshell,<br />

Uitz et al. (2008) investigated relationships between phytoplankton<br />

photo-physiology and community composition by analysing a large database<br />

of HPLC pigment <strong>de</strong>terminations and measurements of phytoplankton<br />

absorption spectra and photosynthesis vs. irradiance curve parameters<br />

collected in various open ocean waters. An empirical mo<strong>de</strong>l that <strong>de</strong>scribes


234 Ecosystem properties<br />

Figure 3: Seasonal climatology (1998-2007) of total and phytoplankton classspecific<br />

primary production <strong>for</strong> the December-February period (boreal winter/<br />

austral summer; left-hand si<strong>de</strong> panels) and <strong>for</strong> the June-August period (boreal<br />

summer/austral winter; right-hand si<strong>de</strong> panels). (a, e) Total primary production in<br />

absolute units of gC.m -2 .d -1 . (b-d) and (f-h) percent contribution of class-specific<br />

production to total primary production. Total primary production, attributed to<br />

the entire algal biomass, was obtained by summing the contributions of each class.<br />

(adapted from Uitz et al., 2010).


Part III – Chapter 3 235<br />

the <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce of algal photo-physiology on the community composition<br />

and <strong>de</strong>pth within the water column, essentially reflecting photoacclimation,<br />

was proposed. The application of the mo<strong>de</strong>l to the set of in<br />

situ data enabled the i<strong>de</strong>ntification of vertical profiles of photo-physiological<br />

properties <strong>for</strong> each phytoplankton size class.<br />

Figure 3 illustrates the seasonal climatology of phytoplankton class-specific<br />

and total primary production obtained by applying the class-specific<br />

approach to a 10-year time series of Chl-a surf<br />

data from SeaWiFS (Uitz et<br />

al., 2010). Temperate and subpolar latitu<strong>de</strong>s in each hemisphere exhibit<br />

high total primary production values in summer, especially in the North<br />

Atlantic Ocean. In contrast, oligotrophic subtropical gyres are associated<br />

with low values and show weak seasonality. Microphytoplankton appear<br />

as a major contributor to primary production in temperate and subpolar<br />

latitu<strong>de</strong>s in spring-summer, especially in the North Atlantic (more than<br />

50%) and in the Southern Ocean (30-50%). Their contribution reaches<br />

a maximum of about 70% in near-coastal upwelling systems year-round,<br />

but is reduced drastically in subtropical gyres. Nanophytoplankton appear<br />

ubiquitous and account <strong>for</strong> a significant fraction of total primary production<br />

(30-60%). The relative contribution of picophytoplankton to primary<br />

production represents up to 40-45% in subtropical gyres and <strong>de</strong>creases to<br />

15% in the northernmost latitu<strong>de</strong>s in summer. The proposed approach<br />

enabled to produce ocean colour-<strong>de</strong>rived climatology of primary production<br />

at a phytoplankton class-specific level in the world’s open oceans<br />

(Uitz et al., 2010). Such in<strong>for</strong>mation represents a significant contribution<br />

to our ability to un<strong>de</strong>rstand and quantify marine carbon cycle. It also provi<strong>de</strong>s<br />

a benchmark <strong>for</strong> monitoring the responses of oceanic ecosystems to<br />

climate change in terms of modifications of phytoplankton biodiversity<br />

and associated carbon fluxes.<br />

3. Challenges posed by current <strong>de</strong>velopments<br />

3.1. Dissolved organic matter (DOM)<br />

Besi<strong>de</strong>s the latter parameters, new <strong>de</strong>velopments in ocean colour remote<br />

sensing are nee<strong>de</strong>d especially <strong>for</strong> studying the dynamics of the dissolved<br />

organic matter. The dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is operationally<br />

<strong>de</strong>fined as the fraction of organic carbon smaller than 0.2µm. It accounts<br />

<strong>for</strong> almost all the organic carbon of the ocean (Chen and Borges, 2009)<br />

being equivalent in magnitu<strong>de</strong> to the atmospheric CO 2<br />

stock. DOC can<br />

be <strong>de</strong>gra<strong>de</strong>d by microbial activity and sunlight action and converted into<br />

CO 2<br />

. Hedges (2002) reported that an increase of 1% in the DOC <strong>de</strong>gradation<br />

rates would lead to a source of CO 2<br />

equivalent or greater than that


236 Ecosystem properties<br />

represented by the fossil fuel combustion. There<strong>for</strong>e it appears crucial, <strong>for</strong><br />

un<strong>de</strong>rstanding the global carbon cycle, to investigate the dynamics of this<br />

biogeochemical compartment, which is still poorly constrained. This is<br />

particularly true <strong>for</strong> the coastal ocean, where DOC fluxes are potentially<br />

large and highly variable in time and space, due to numerous driving<br />

factors taking effect on these very heterogeneous ecosystems, such as biological<br />

activity, land-sea interactions, and strong hydrodynamic <strong>for</strong>cing.<br />

In that context, ef<strong>for</strong>ts are nee<strong>de</strong>d to <strong>de</strong>velop research activities aiming to<br />

estimate DOC concentrations and fluxes from space.<br />

Recent studies have emphasised the potential of satellite imagery <strong>for</strong><br />

retrieving DOC concentrations with a satisfying accuracy (Mannino et<br />

al., 2008; Del Castillo et al., 2008; Fichot and Benner, 2011). The current<br />

main limitation <strong>for</strong> estimating DOC concentrations from radiative<br />

measurements stands in the crucial need of a relevant correlation between<br />

DOC concentration, which is uncoloured, and CDOM (coloured dissolved<br />

organic matter), which represents the coloured part of the marine<br />

dissolved material and is there<strong>for</strong>e measurable from space. Significant<br />

DOC-CDOM relationships were documented <strong>for</strong> various coastal ecosystems,<br />

especially those influenced by rivers discharges (e.g. Ferrari, 2000;<br />

Mannino et al., 2008; Del Castillo et al., 2008). However, the diversity in<br />

the origin of the dissolved material as well as the potential <strong>de</strong>coupling in<br />

the sensitivity of DOC and CDOM to various environmental factors (e.g.<br />

biological activity, photo-<strong>de</strong>gradation processes…) induces regional and<br />

seasonal variations in the CDOM-DOC relationships. Environmental<br />

effects can significantly alter or preclu<strong>de</strong> the establishment of a significant<br />

link between CDOM and DOC, <strong>for</strong> example, in the oceanic waters<br />

and coastal ecosystems not influenced by terrestrial inputs. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

our ability to <strong>de</strong>rive dissolved organic carbon contents from satellite measurements<br />

is still limited. The un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of environmental effects<br />

through <strong>de</strong>dicated in situ or laboratory studies represents the major challenge<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>de</strong>veloping DOC inversion algorithms in the next years. These<br />

algorithms will provi<strong>de</strong>, in a near future, relevant insights <strong>for</strong> global ocean<br />

carbon cycle study.<br />

3.2. Scaling down and up from regional scales to global scale<br />

Coastal oceans have fast changing and contrasted optical properties,<br />

which prevents the <strong>de</strong>velopment of a “simple”, general algorithm to <strong>de</strong>rive<br />

in-water bio-optical and biogeochemical parameters <strong>for</strong> the whole ocean<br />

from satellite in<strong>for</strong>mation. There<strong>for</strong>e, open ocean or coastal algorithms<br />

are usually <strong>de</strong>veloped to focus on an area-specific range of optical variability.<br />

However, these algorithms have some limitations related to their<br />

high <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ncy upon the data set used <strong>for</strong> their <strong>de</strong>velopment, as well


Part III – Chapter 3 237<br />

as to the difficulty to capture the numerous high frequency processes<br />

affecting regional bio-optical relationships. Moreover, the scaling-up of<br />

such regional approaches to <strong>de</strong>rive biogeochemical parameters at large<br />

scale (i.e. global) would require to consi<strong>de</strong>r a patchwork of algorithms<br />

<strong>de</strong>veloped on a mosaic of regions. This seems to be difficult to set up<br />

in practice. Another approach consists in taking explicitly into account<br />

the optical diversity of the marine environment within the algorithms<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment procedure. This was shown to be crucial <strong>for</strong> explaining the<br />

dispersion found around the bio-optical relationships (Loisel et al., 2010).<br />

In practice, this original approach aims to classify the different regions<br />

according to their optical properties as <strong>de</strong>scribed by the marine reflectance<br />

spectra. Further, region-specific algorithms (empirical or semi-analytical)<br />

are <strong>de</strong>veloped and applied to the <strong>de</strong>fined optical regions. The main<br />

advantage of this classification-based approach is that it is in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt of<br />

the location and time period, being thus more universal than classical<br />

approaches and potentially applicable to large-scale studies. The potential<br />

of this classification-based approach <strong>for</strong> improving the per<strong>for</strong>mance of<br />

the inversion procedure has been recently emphasised <strong>for</strong> the retrieval of<br />

the Chl-a (Mélin et al., 2011) and SPM concentrations (Vantrepotte et al.,<br />

submitted).<br />

3.3. Theoretical studies<br />

If the last years have seen the <strong>de</strong>velopment of different approaches to distinguish<br />

phytoplankton groups from space, the current techniques are<br />

usually based on empirical methods (see above). Despite the fact that<br />

remotely sensed measurements are generally well matched with in situ measurements,<br />

the un<strong>de</strong>rlying theoretical foundation is still to be addressed.<br />

In a recent study published by Alvain et al. (2011), a radiative transfer<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>l called Hydrolight (Mobley et al., 1993) was used to reconstruct the<br />

signals used in Physat. A sensitivity analysis of the method to the following<br />

three mo<strong>de</strong>l parameters was conducted: the specific phytoplankton<br />

absorption, the dissolved organic matter absorption, and the particle backscattering<br />

coefficients. This last parameter explained the largest part of the<br />

variability in the radiative anomalies. Our results also showed that specific<br />

environments associated with each group must be consi<strong>de</strong>red imperatively.<br />

This study represents a first step toward a better un<strong>de</strong>rstanding and future<br />

improvement of phytoplankton groups <strong>de</strong>tection methods based on specific<br />

signal i<strong>de</strong>ntification. In a near future, further advances are expected<br />

from the improvement of the optical sensors themselves, especially their<br />

spectral and spatial resolution. This may also pave the way <strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>velopment<br />

of new algorithm based on both phytoplankton groups and their<br />

environmental conditions (such as the content in dissolved organic matter).


238 Ecosystem properties<br />

3.4. Geostationary sensors<br />

The recent <strong>de</strong>velopment of geostationary ocean colour sensors will increase<br />

the precision of the remote sensing measurements and will provi<strong>de</strong> relevant<br />

insights <strong>for</strong> the study of marine biogeochemical cycles. Geostationary satellites<br />

continuously view the same region of the Earth’s surface. The size of<br />

the observed region <strong>de</strong>pends on the spacecraft specification. It thus allows<br />

obtaining high quality and frequent observations of a <strong>de</strong>fined area. Such an<br />

instrument is there<strong>for</strong>e useful in or<strong>de</strong>r to follow the response of marine ecosystems<br />

to short-term variations in the environmental conditions. In particular,<br />

it is of interest <strong>for</strong> monitoring the effects of rivers plumes, tidal front,<br />

and mixing on the biotic and abiotic material present in coastal areas or<br />

assessing the effects of exceptional events (storms, red ti<strong>de</strong>s, dissemination of<br />

sediments or pollutants). Data <strong>de</strong>rived from geostationary satellites will also<br />

provi<strong>de</strong> relevant in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> biogeochemical mo<strong>de</strong>lling purposes as well<br />

as <strong>for</strong> research activities related to the biogeochemical cycles at daily scales.<br />

The South Korean instrument on board the COMS-1 satellite (GOCI, geostationary<br />

ocean colour imager), launched in 2010, is the first ocean-colour<br />

sensor in a geostationary orbit. The target area of GOCI covers a large region<br />

(2500 × 2500km) around the Korean peninsula. It resolution is of 500 m<br />

while it acquires data at a 1-hour frequency. The other ocean colour geostationary<br />

missions that are currently planned (oCAPI-CNES, GeoCAPE-<br />

NASA) will increase the spatial coverage and the number of in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

<strong>de</strong>livered by such sensors.<br />

3.5 Cross-using remote sensing data<br />

Consi<strong>de</strong>ring the recent variety of new ocean colour products, cross using<br />

studies will open a large range of new applications. For example, in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

on dominant phytoplankton groups could be analysed concomitantly<br />

with maps of POC and particle size distribution, hence providing<br />

new insights into biogeochemical or ecological processes. An illustration<br />

is shown in figure 1 and 2 <strong>for</strong> a Northern area (45°N-52°N, 30°W-15°W)<br />

and a Southern area (47°S-40°S, 65°E-80°E). The two areas are almost<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntical in terms of Chl-a concentration but distinct in terms of POC<br />

concentration. This difference also exists in terms of phytoplankton<br />

groups. The region in the Southern Ocean is dominated by diatoms<br />

whereas the region in the northern Atlantic is dominated by nanoeukaryotes.<br />

The comparison of the spatial distribution of Chl-a, POC and<br />

dominant phytoplankton groups prompts the following question. Is it<br />

possible to i<strong>de</strong>ntify from space, and at a global scale, some differences in<br />

the “POC vs Chl-a” relationship based on the dominant phytoplankton<br />

group as <strong>de</strong>tected by the Physat tool? Further investigations are required<br />

to fully answer this question but our simple example illustrates how


Part III – Chapter 3 239<br />

much cross-using of remote sensing data will be necessary and useful in<br />

a near future.<br />

Authors’ references<br />

Séverine Alvain, Vincent Vantrepotte, Lucile Du<strong>for</strong>et-Gaurier:<br />

Université du Littoral <strong>de</strong> la Côte d’Opale-Lille Nord, Laboratoire d’Océanologie<br />

et Géosciences, Lille1-ULCO-CNRS UMR 8187, Lille, France<br />

Julia Uitz:<br />

Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Laboratoire d’Océanographie <strong>de</strong><br />

Villefranche, UPMC-CNRS UMR 7093, Villefranche-sur-Mer, France<br />

Corresponding author: Séverine Alvain, severine.alvain@univ-littoral.fr<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

The authors would like to thank the NASA SeaWiFS project and the<br />

NASA/GSFC/DAAC <strong>for</strong> the production and distribution of the SeaWiFS<br />

data.<br />

References<br />

Aiken J., Pradhan Y., Barlow R., Laven<strong>de</strong>r S., Poulton A., Holligan P., Hardman-<br />

Mount<strong>for</strong>d N. J., 2009. Phytoplankton pigments and functional types in<br />

the Atlantic Ocean: a <strong>de</strong>cadal assessment, 1995-2005. DeepSea Research<br />

Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 56, pp. 899-917.<br />

Alvain S., Moulin C., Dandonneau Y., Breon F. M., 2005. Remote sensing<br />

of phytoplankton groups in case 1 waters from global SeaWiFS<br />

imagery. DeepSea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 52,<br />

pp. 1989-2004.<br />

Alvain S., Moulin C., Dandonneau Y., Loisel H., 2008. Seasonal distribution<br />

and succession of dominant phytoplankton groups in the global ocean: a<br />

satellite view. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 22, pp. 1-15.<br />

Alvain S., Loisel H., Dessailly D., 2011. Theoretical analysis of ocean color<br />

radiances anomalies and implications <strong>for</strong> phytoplankton groups <strong>de</strong>tection<br />

in case 1 waters. Optics Express, 20, pp. 1070-1083.<br />

Antoine D., André J. M., Morel A., 1996. Oceanic primary production: II-<br />

Estimation at global scale from satellite (Coastal Zone Color Scanner)<br />

chlorophyll. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 10, pp. 57-69.


240 Ecosystem properties<br />

Brewin R., Sathyendranath S., Hirata T., Laven<strong>de</strong>r S., Barciela R. M., Hardman-<br />

Mount<strong>for</strong>d N.J., 2010. A three-component mo<strong>de</strong>l of phytoplankton size<br />

class <strong>for</strong> the Atlantic Ocean. Ecological Mo<strong>de</strong>lling, 221, pp. 1472-1483.<br />

Bricaud A., Morel A., Babin M., Allali K., Claustre H., 1998. Variations of light<br />

absorption by suspen<strong>de</strong>d particles with chlorophyll a concentration in<br />

oceanic (case 1) waters: analysis and implications <strong>for</strong> bio-optical mo<strong>de</strong>ls.<br />

Journal of Geophysical Research, 103, pp. 31033-31044.<br />

Bricaud A., Claustre H., Ras J., oubelkheir K., 2004. Natural variability<br />

of phytoplankton absorption in oceanic waters: influence of the size<br />

structure of algal populations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109,<br />

C11010.<br />

Chen C. T. A., Borges A.V., 2009. Reconciling opposing views on carbon<br />

cycling in the coastal ocean: continental shelves as sinks and near-shore<br />

ecosystems as sources of atmospheric CO2. Deep Sea Research Part II:<br />

Topical Studies in Oceanography, 56, pp. 578-590.<br />

Ciotti A. M., Bricaud A., 2006. Retrievals of a size parameter <strong>for</strong> phytoplankton<br />

and spectral light absorption by colored <strong>de</strong>trital matter from water-leaving<br />

radiances at SeaWiFS channels in a continental shelf region off Brazil.<br />

Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 4, pp. 237–253.<br />

Claustre H., Morel A., Babin M., Cailliau C., Marie D., Marty J.-C., Talliez<br />

D., Vaulot D., 1999. Variability in particle attenuation and chlorophyll<br />

fluorescence in the tropical Pacific: scales, patterns and biogeochemical<br />

implications. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104, pp. 3401-3422.<br />

Dandonneau Y., Deschamps P.-Y., Nicolas J. M., Loisel H., Blanchot J., Montel<br />

Y., Thieuleux F., Bécu G., 2004. Seasonal and interannual variability of<br />

ocean color and composition of phytoplankton communities in the North<br />

Atlantic, Equatorial Pacific and South Pacific. Deep Sea Research Part II:<br />

Topical Studies in Oceanography, 51, pp. 303-318.<br />

Del Castillo C. E., Miller R. L., 2008. On the use of ocean color remote sensing<br />

to measure the transport of dissolved carbon by the Mississippi River<br />

Plume. Remote Sensing of the Environment, 11, pp. 836-844.<br />

DuRand M. D., Olson R. J., Chisholm, S. W., 2001. Phytoplankton population<br />

dynamics at the Bermuda Atlantic time-series station in the Sargasso<br />

Sea. Deep Sea Research, Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 48,<br />

pp. 1983-2003.<br />

Ferrari G.M., 2000. The relationship between chromophoric dissolved organic<br />

matter and dissolved organic carbon in the European Atlantic coastal area<br />

and in the West Mediterranean Sea (Gulf of Lions). Marine Chemistry,<br />

70, pp. 339-357.<br />

Fichot C. G., Benner R., 2011. A novel method to estimate DOC concentrations<br />

from CDOM absorption coefficients in coastal waters. Geophysical<br />

Research Letters, 38, L03610.<br />

Gordon H. R., McCluney M. R., 1975. Estimation of the <strong>de</strong>pth of the sunlight<br />

penetration in the sea <strong>for</strong> remote sensing. Applied Optics, 14, pp. 413-416.


Part III – Chapter 3 241<br />

Gordon H. R., Morel A., 1983. Remote assessment of ocean color <strong>for</strong><br />

interpretation of satellite visible imagery. A review. Springer-Verlag, Berlin,<br />

Germany.<br />

Hedges J. I., 2002. Why dissolved organic matter, in: Hansell D. A., Carlson<br />

C. A. (Eds.) Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved Organic Matter.,<br />

Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press, San Diego, pp. 1-33.<br />

Kostadinov T. S., Siegel D. A., Maritorena S., 2009. Retrieval of the particle<br />

size distribution from satellite ocean color observations. Journal of<br />

Geophysical Research, 114, CO9015.<br />

Loisel H., Stramski D., 2000. Estimation of the inherent optical properties of<br />

natural waters from the irradiance attenuation coefficient and reflectance<br />

in the presence of Raman scattering. Applied Optics, 39, pp. 3001-3011.<br />

Loisel H., Bosc E., Stramski D., Oubelkheir K., Deschamps P.-Y., 2001.<br />

Seasonal variability of the backscattering coefficient in the Mediterranean<br />

Sea based on Satellite SeaWiFS imagery. Geophysical Research Letters, 28,<br />

pp. 4203-4206.<br />

Loisel H., Nicolas J. M., Deschamps P.-Y., Frouin R., 2002. Seasonal and<br />

inter-annual variability of particulate organic matter in the global ocean.<br />

Geophysical Research Letters, 29, pp. 2196-2200.<br />

Loisel H., Nicolas J.-M., Sciandra A., Stramski D., Poteau A., 2006. Spectral<br />

<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ncy of optical backscattering by marine particles from satellite<br />

remote sensing of the global ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111,<br />

C09024.<br />

Loisel H., Poteau, A., 2006. Inversion of IOP based on Rrs and remotely<br />

retrieved Kd. IOCCG. Remote sensing of inherent optical properties:<br />

fundamentals, tests of algorithms, and applications, in: Lee Z. P. (Ed.)<br />

Reports of the International Ocean-Colour Coordinating Groups, n° 5,<br />

IOCCG, Dartmouth, Canada, pp. 35-41.<br />

Longhurst A., 2007. Ecological Geography of the Sea, second ed. Aca<strong>de</strong>mic<br />

Press, San Diego, USA.<br />

Mannino A., Russ M. E., Hooker S. b., 2008. Algorithm <strong>de</strong>velopment<br />

and validation <strong>for</strong> satellite-<strong>de</strong>rived distributions of DOC and CDOM in<br />

the U.S. Middle Atlantic bight. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113,<br />

C07051.<br />

Marty J.-C., Chiavérini J., Pizay M. D., Avril B., 2002. Seasonal and interannual<br />

dynamics of nutrients and phytoplankton pigments in the western<br />

Mediterranean Sea at the DYFAMED time series station (1991-1999). Deep<br />

Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 49, pp. 2017-2030.<br />

Mélin F., Vantrepotte V., Clerici M., D’Alimonte D., Zibordi G., Berthon J.-F.,<br />

Canuti E. 2011. Multi-sensor satellite time series of optical properties and<br />

chlorophyll a concentration in the Adriatic Sea. Progress in Oceanography,<br />

91, pp. 229-244.<br />

Mobley C.D., Gentili B., Gordon H. R., Zhonghai J., Kattawar G. W., Morel A.,<br />

Reinersman P., Stamnes K., Stavn R. H., 1993. Comparison of numerical


242 Ecosystem properties<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>ls <strong>for</strong> computing un<strong>de</strong>rwater light fields. Applied Optics, 32,<br />

pp. 7484-7504.<br />

Morel A., Prieur L., 1977. Analysis of variations in ocean color. Limnology and<br />

Oceanography, 22, pp. 709-722.<br />

Morel A., 1988. Optical mo<strong>de</strong>ling of the upper ocean in relation to its biogenous<br />

matter content (case 1 waters). Journal of Geophysical Research,<br />

93, pp. 10749-10768.<br />

Morel A., 1991. Light and marine photosynthesis: A spectral mo<strong>de</strong>l with<br />

geochemical and climatological implications. Progress in Oceanography,<br />

26, pp. 263-306.<br />

Raitsos D., Laven<strong>de</strong>r S. J., Maravelias C. D., Haralabous J., Richardson A. J.,<br />

Reid P. C., 2008. I<strong>de</strong>ntifying four phytoplankton functional types from<br />

space: An ecological approach. Limnology and Oceanography, 53,<br />

pp. 605-613.<br />

Sathyendranath S., Watts L., Devred E., Platt T., Caverhill C., Maass H., 2004.<br />

Discrimination of diatoms from other phytoplankton using ocean-colour<br />

data. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 272, pp. 59-68.<br />

Siegel D. A., Maritorena S., Nelson N. B., 2002. Global distribution and<br />

dynamics of colored dissolved and <strong>de</strong>trital organic materials. Journal of<br />

Geophysical Research, 107, pp. 3228-3242.<br />

Smith R. C., Baker K. S., 1978. The bio-optical state of ocean waters and remote<br />

sensing. Limonology and Oceanography, 23, pp. 247-259.<br />

Stramski D., Reynolds R. A, Kahru M., Mitchell, B.G., 1999. Estimation of<br />

particulate organic carbon in the ocean from satellite remote sensing.<br />

Science, 285, pp. 239-242.<br />

Uitz J., Claustre H., Morel A., Hooker S. B., 2006. Vertical distribution of<br />

phytoplankton communities in open ocean: an assessment based on<br />

surface chlorophyll. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, CO8005.<br />

Uitz J., Huot Y., Bruyant F., Babin M., Claustre H., 2008. Relating phytoplankton<br />

photophysiological properties to community structure on large scale.<br />

Limnology and Oceanography, 53, pp. 614-630.<br />

Uitz J., Claustre H., Gentili B., Stramski D., 2010. Phytoplankton class-specific<br />

primary production in the world’s oceans: seasonal and interannual<br />

variability from satellite observations. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 24,<br />

pp. 3016-3035.<br />

Vidussi F., Claustre H., Manca B. B., Luchetta A., Marty J.-C., 2001.<br />

Phytoplankton pigment distribution in relation to upper thermocline<br />

circulation in the eastern Mediterranean Sea during winter. Journal of<br />

Geophysical Research, 106, pp. 19939-19956.<br />

Zubkov M. V., Sleigh M. A., Burkill P. H., Leakey R. J. G., 2000. Picoplankton<br />

community structure on the Atlantic meridional transect: a comparison<br />

between seasons. Progress in Oceanography, 45, pp. 369-386.


Chapter 4<br />

Tracking canopy phenology<br />

and structure using ground-based<br />

remote sensed NDVI measurements<br />

Jean-Yves Pontailler, Kamel Soudani<br />

1. Introduction and general context<br />

The NDVI (normalised-difference vegetation in<strong>de</strong>x) is the most popular<br />

remotely sensed spectral vegetation in<strong>de</strong>x. It was <strong>de</strong>fined in the early<br />

seventies (Kriegler et al., 1969; Rouse et al., 1973; Tucker, 1977; 1979) <strong>for</strong><br />

remote sensing purposes, and has been mostly used to track green vegetation<br />

from satellites, airplanes and ground-based spectral measurements.<br />

The first measurements of vegetation indices from space were conducted<br />

in 1972 thanks to Landsat 1 and its embed<strong>de</strong>d MSS (multispectral scanner)<br />

and this technique carries on nowadays with satellites such as Spot<br />

or Modis Terra. The NDVI is an estimate of the amount of visible light<br />

absorbed by canopies and can correlate with gross primary photosynthesis<br />

(Running et al., 2004). The measurement of NDVI exploits the fact<br />

that green vegetation absorbs largely the inci<strong>de</strong>nt red radiation but reflects<br />

a large part of the infrared radiation. By contrast, a bare soil does not<br />

exhibit such differences. Thus, NDVI is <strong>de</strong>fined as a normalised difference<br />

between red (RED) and near-infrared (NIR) reflectance given by the<br />

equation:<br />

NDVI = (NIR – RED) / (NIR + RED)<br />

The NDVI value ranges from -1.0 to 1.0: negative values indicates water<br />

and snow, values close to zero indicates bare soil, and high positive values<br />

indicates sparse vegetation (0.2 to 0.5) or <strong>de</strong>nse green vegetation (up<br />

to 0.85). NDVI can also be related to the leaf area in<strong>de</strong>x (LAI), green


244 Ecosystem properties<br />

biomass, photosynthetic activity or to ground cover, which are relevant<br />

parameters in canopy and <strong>for</strong>est ecosystem mo<strong>de</strong>lling (Bréda et al., 2002).<br />

Several factors affect the accuracy of satellite-based NDVI measurements,<br />

<strong>for</strong> example, the presence of clouds or atmospheric dust in the solar and<br />

sensor viewing directions and topography. These impose geometric and<br />

atmospheric corrections (Soudani et al., 2006). Surprisingly, very few<br />

studies make use of ground-based NDVI measurements to record vegetation<br />

dynamics in situ in spite of the limited constraints imposed by this<br />

technique. This chapter <strong>de</strong>scribes a new low-cost laboratory-ma<strong>de</strong> NDVI<br />

sensor <strong>de</strong>voted to track in situ temporal variations in canopy structure and<br />

plant phenology.<br />

2. Designing a new NDVI sensor<br />

2.1. General concept<br />

Most authors agree on the fact that an accurate NDVI estimate requires<br />

measurements in a narrow red band centred around the chlorophyll<br />

absorption band (between 650 and 680nm) and in a narrow or broad<br />

near infrared band placed in the 750-1100mm range (Thenkabail et al.,<br />

2000; Elvidge and Chen, 1995). In these conditions, a relevant choice<br />

<strong>for</strong> the light <strong>de</strong>tectors of an on-ground NDVI sensor would be to couple<br />

silicon photodio<strong>de</strong>s that operate in the red and near-infrared ranges with<br />

interference filters that transmit the required bandpass only. This operating<br />

mo<strong>de</strong> is sound but such <strong>de</strong>tectors typically show a low sensitivity due<br />

to the necessity of collimating inci<strong>de</strong>nt radiation (i.e. removing oblique<br />

beams) to allow the interference filters to work properly. The narrow red<br />

band is more affected by very low output levels, especially over <strong>de</strong>nse<br />

canopies that absorb a large part of incoming red light. In these conditions,<br />

we chose not to use interference filters but instead ma<strong>de</strong> use of<br />

long-pass filters providing a sharp cut-off. Also, we took benefit of the<br />

peculiar shape of the spectral response curve of gallium arseni<strong>de</strong> phosphi<strong>de</strong><br />

photodio<strong>de</strong>s (GaAsP, Hamamatsu Photonics, Japan) when <strong>de</strong>signing<br />

the red <strong>de</strong>tector.<br />

2.2. Sensor <strong>de</strong>sign and calibration<br />

The red <strong>de</strong>tector uses a large GaAsP photodio<strong>de</strong> (TO-8 package) coupled<br />

with a Schott RG645 glass-tinted long-pass filter (Schott Glaswerke,<br />

Mainz, Germany). Thanks to this combination, only the portion of the<br />

GaAsP response curve corresponding to the longest wavelengths is used<br />

(figure 1A). As a consequence, the <strong>de</strong>tector has a narrow response curve


Part III – Chapter 4 245<br />

centred on 655nm. The near-infrared <strong>de</strong>tector is equipped with a silicon<br />

photodio<strong>de</strong> (TO-5 package) and a Schott RG780 glass-tinted long-pass filter.<br />

It has there<strong>for</strong>e a broad response curve centred on 825nm.<br />

Figure 1: Characteristics of RED and NIR <strong>de</strong>tector of the custom-ma<strong>de</strong> NDVI<br />

sensor. A. Relative response of the RED <strong>de</strong>tector. The relative response results from<br />

the shape of a gallium arseni<strong>de</strong> phosphi<strong>de</strong> photodio<strong>de</strong> (GaAsP) and from the cut-off<br />

of a long-pass filter. B. Relative response of RED and NIR (near infrared) <strong>de</strong>tectors.<br />

The relative spectral response of the two channels (figure 1B) was monitored<br />

using a halogen stabilised light source and a monochromator (H10,<br />

Jobin Yvon, France), combined with simultaneous energy measurement<br />

with a pyranometer (CE 180, Cimel, France).<br />

The body of the sensor is 85mm long and 38mm in diameter. It is ma<strong>de</strong> of<br />

polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) surroun<strong>de</strong>d by a stainless steel housing<br />

(figure 2A). The two <strong>de</strong>tectors face a 5mm thick acrylic diffuser (Altuglass<br />

740, Altulor, France). Current is converted to voltage with shunt resistors.<br />

To provi<strong>de</strong> a high sensitivity, the value of the resistors was selected as<br />

high as possible without affecting signal linearity. As a result, no amplification<br />

is necessary contrary to similar sensors using silicon dio<strong>de</strong>s and<br />

interference filters (Methy et al., 1987). The or<strong>de</strong>r of magnitu<strong>de</strong> of the<br />

output level is about 25mV so the sensor can be connected directly to<br />

most commercial data loggers. Other characteristics of the sensor can be<br />

found in Pontailler et al. (2003). Prior to its <strong>de</strong>ployment in situ, the sensor<br />

is calibrated against a spectroradiometer (Li-1800, Li-Cor, Nebraska,<br />

USA), consi<strong>de</strong>ring bandwidths equal to 640-660 nm and 780-920 nm <strong>for</strong><br />

RED and NIR, respectively.


246 Ecosystem properties<br />

Figure 2: The custom-ma<strong>de</strong> NDVI sensor <strong>de</strong>veloped at the Laboratoire Écologie-<br />

Systématique-Évolution (CNRS, Université Paris Sud, Agro Paris Tech , UMR 8079,<br />

Orsay, France). A. Cross-section of the NDVI sensor. b. NDVI sensor per<strong>for</strong>ming<br />

routine measurements at barbeau Carboeurope site.© J.-y. Pontailler.<br />

2.3. Operating mo<strong>de</strong><br />

The sensor has a view angle of 100° with a greater sensitivity in the centre<br />

of the field of view and is “looking” downwards. Users can restrict<br />

this angle by using a black hood, which <strong>de</strong>creases both channels outputs<br />

equally so that NDVI values remain unaffected. The fact that a single sensor<br />

provi<strong>de</strong>s no reflectance data but measures radiance should be kept in<br />

mind. Computing NDVI from radiance assumes that the RED/NIR ratio<br />

of inci<strong>de</strong>nt light is constant, which is not totally true due to the presence<br />

of clouds or variations in solar angle. Of course, it is possible to add a second<br />

sensor looking upwards to obtain true reflectance data. However, this<br />

second sensor has to be cosine-corrected and must be frequently cleaned<br />

because it is exposed to bad weather. That is why we promote the use of a<br />

single sensor looking downwards. It is a robust maintenance-free solution,<br />

well adapted to routine measurements. Data filtering based on time, sun<br />

elevation, or inci<strong>de</strong>nt radiation may be helpful to increase accuracy.


Part III – Chapter 4 247<br />

3. In situ <strong>de</strong>ployment to monitor vegetation phenology<br />

Up to now, 47 sensors were manufactured and installed on various sites<br />

including flux towers within Carboeurope network, crops, meadows,<br />

Mediterranean vegetation and shrubs or rain <strong>for</strong>est. All sensors were i<strong>de</strong>ntical<br />

and calibrated in the same way in our laboratory be<strong>for</strong>e shipping. During<br />

measurements, sensors were linked to Campbell CR10x or CR1000 data loggers<br />

(Campbell Scientific, Utah, USA) using 0-50 or 0-250mV input ranges.<br />

Zeroes (night values) were checked and offsets were adjusted if necessary.<br />

Measurements were per<strong>for</strong>med at one minute interval and half-hourly average<br />

values were recor<strong>de</strong>d. Data obtained when inci<strong>de</strong>nt radiation was low<br />

were rejected (below 250Wm -2 ) and filtered data were then averaged daily.<br />

3.1. Measurements over <strong>for</strong>ests<br />

In <strong>for</strong>ests stands, NDVI sensors were installed on top of towers measuring<br />

carbon and water vapour fluxes by eddy covariance. <strong>Sensors</strong> had a view<br />

angle restricted to approximately 60° and were obliquely set up at 20° from<br />

vertical (figure 2B). They were located from 4 to 20m over the top of the<br />

canopy. The NDVI sensor nicely tracks phenological events over <strong>de</strong>ciduous<br />

<strong>for</strong>ests. In an oak stand located in Barbeau Carboeurope site (Quercus<br />

sessiliflora, Seine-et-Marne, France), the course of NDVI over time highlights<br />

several phases (figure 3A). be<strong>for</strong>e budburst, the sensor mostly <strong>de</strong>tects<br />

branches, trunks, leaf litter and bare soil. NDVI values are stable around 0.4<br />

and display some slight variations due to modifications of litter moisture<br />

and direct versus diffuse radiation regimes. After budburst, NDVI increases<br />

rapidly during leaf expansion and maturation that lasts about 30 days until<br />

it reaches its maximum value in the late spring at day-of-the-year 130. Then,<br />

NDVI is almost constant during summer from early May to the end of<br />

September. This period constitutes the main season of growth in temperate<br />

<strong>de</strong>ciduous <strong>for</strong>ests. The NDVI plateau during the growing season is characterised<br />

by a very slow and regular <strong>de</strong>crease of NDVI values from 0.9 to 0.8,<br />

which may be caused by imperceptible colour changes in the canopy (slight<br />

yellowing) and probably sun-view geometry variations throughout summer.<br />

Our research team per<strong>for</strong>med eddy-covariance measurements in<br />

Carboeurope <strong>de</strong>ciduous sites, and observed at the same period a similar<br />

regular <strong>de</strong>crease of carbon uptake probably due to early foliage senescence<br />

(Granier et al., 2000). This phenomenon is not always taken into account<br />

by process-based mo<strong>de</strong>ls of canopy functioning. During this stage of<br />

NDVI maximum, the radiance measured by the red channel is very low<br />

and NDVI signal approaches saturation. Later in the season, leaf yellowing<br />

and fall both cause a strong <strong>de</strong>crease of NDVI values. Colour and <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />

changes partly overlap, and the <strong>de</strong>convolution of signal components


248 Ecosystem properties<br />

is not easy. We can notice that the NDVI curve matches pretty well with<br />

the evolution of the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR)<br />

transmitted by the canopy during the same period, indicating that NDVI<br />

is a good indicator of the amount of absorbed visible light (figure 3A).<br />

Figure 3: Seasonal and inter-annual variations in NDVI measurements over a<br />

<strong>de</strong>ciduous <strong>for</strong>est study plot. A. Temporal profiles of NDVI and transmitted PAR<br />

(photosynthetically active radiation) in Carboeurope oak <strong>for</strong>est site in Barbeau<br />

(France) in 2006. B, C. NDVI temporal profiles at Barbeau site over six years (2005-<br />

2010) and annual carbon net exchange of the stand from 2006 to 2010. Year 2007<br />

was characterised by a stronger carbon storage flux, which was <strong>de</strong>tected by NDVI<br />

measurements (red arrow)


Part III – Chapter 4 249<br />

Figure 4: Seasonal variation in NDVI measurements over two evergreen <strong>for</strong>est<br />

study plots. A. NDVI temporal profile at le bray Carboeurope pine site in 2007. b.<br />

NDVI temporal profile in Paracou site (French Guyana, rain <strong>for</strong>est) in 2007 during<br />

two dry seasons (yellow bands).<br />

The sensor also highlights inter-annual variations of phenological events.<br />

Figure 3B shows the evolution of NDVI over a 6-year period in Barbeau<br />

Carboeurope flux site. Few inter-annual changes are noticeable between<br />

day-of-the-year 130 and day-of-the-year 275 but spring and autumn greatly<br />

differ from one year to another. These changes are of importance. For<br />

instance, an early budburst was observed during the warm spring of 2007,


250 Ecosystem properties<br />

inducing an exceptional annual carbon uptake as shown by eddy-covariance<br />

measurements on the same site (Delpierre et al., 2009). Carbon<br />

assimilation is consi<strong>de</strong>rable at this period of the year because canopy photosynthetic<br />

capacity is intact. By contrast, a late foliage senescence has a<br />

limited impact on carbon budget because aged leaves have a lower photosynthetic<br />

capacity and because there is less available light at this period of<br />

the year. Of course, the length of the leafy period is not the only parameter<br />

that influences the carbon uptake of <strong>de</strong>ciduous <strong>for</strong>ests. We can notice<br />

on figure 3B that year 2009 had a reduced net carbon budget in spite of a<br />

relatively long leafy period. This may be due both to the negative impact<br />

of several cold weeks that occurred immediately after leaf expansion and<br />

an increase of ecosystem respiration in autumn because of a particularly<br />

mild weather.<br />

A NDVI sensor can also track the phenology of evergreen tree species,<br />

but with small variations of NDVI due to subtle phenological changes<br />

in these ecosystems. figure 4A shows NDVI values measured in a pine<br />

<strong>for</strong>est in Le Bray Carboeurope site (Pinus pinaster, Giron<strong>de</strong>, France). The<br />

sensor can monitor the rise and growth of new shoots during the spring<br />

from day-of-the-year 90 to day-of-the-year 160. In the tropical rain <strong>for</strong>est<br />

in Paracou Carboeurope site (French Guiana), NDVI varies little over the<br />

year, as one would expect in evergreen moist <strong>for</strong>ests. Nevertheless, we<br />

observe two periods with a <strong>de</strong>cline in NDVI of variable magnitu<strong>de</strong>. These<br />

two periods of NDVI <strong>de</strong>cline are concomitant with the two dry seasons,<br />

the short dry season called “the little summer of March” and the major<br />

dry season from July to November (figure 4B).<br />

3.2. Measurements over savannahs and crops<br />

In a savannah (Congo), a NDVI sensor was useful to <strong>de</strong>scribe the evolution<br />

of the herbaceous cover (figure 5A). A mo<strong>de</strong>rate wet season was<br />

observed from day-of-the-year 60 to day-of-the-year 160, followed by a<br />

dryer period. A fire occurred on day-of-the-year 185, lowering NDVI values<br />

to zero. A fast regrowth took place from day-of-the-year 300 onwards<br />

after a fairly long dry period. Similarly, crops (figure 5B) exhibit large<br />

temporal changes from ploughing to harvest. The colour and ground<br />

cover of crops there<strong>for</strong>e both vary intensely, and NDVI sensors may be<br />

useful to characterise these changes. figure 5B shows the temporal pattern<br />

of NDVI in a winter wheat field in Belgium. NDVI reaches a maximum<br />

value in May (day-of-the-year 130) and drops to zero within two months<br />

due to an intense yellowing. The harvest does not modify the signal. Later<br />

sparse vegetation appears up to the end of the vegetation period (day-ofthe-year<br />

260).


Part III – Chapter 4 251<br />

Figure 5: Seasonal variation in NDVI measurements over a savannah and a winter<br />

wheat study plot. A. NDVI temporal profile in Tchizalamou site (Congo, savannah)<br />

in 2008 during wet and dry seasons. b. NDVI temporal profile in Lonzée site<br />

(Belgium, winter wheat) in 2007, be<strong>for</strong>e and after havest.<br />

4. Use of the NDVI sensor to estimate the leaf area in<strong>de</strong>x<br />

and plant biomass<br />

4.1. Leaf area in<strong>de</strong>x<br />

The leaf area in<strong>de</strong>x (LAI) is <strong>de</strong>fined as the total one-si<strong>de</strong>d area of leaf tissue<br />

per unit ground surface area. It is a key parameter to <strong>de</strong>scribe the state<br />

of a <strong>for</strong>est ecosystem and a relevant input to productivity mo<strong>de</strong>ls. Several


252 Ecosystem properties<br />

methods have been <strong>de</strong>vised <strong>for</strong> estimating LAI. Destructive methods<br />

that require direct sampling and allometric methods – which establishes<br />

quantitative relations between several easy to measure dimensions in<br />

the canopy (tree size and/or <strong>de</strong>nsity, leaf characteristics…) and leaf area<br />

in<strong>de</strong>x (Ceulemans and al., 1993) – are cumbersome, time consuming and<br />

site <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt. Conversely, optical methods are fast and appropriate <strong>for</strong><br />

monitoring spatial and temporal dynamics of canopy structure (Bréda et<br />

al., 2002).<br />

Our NDVI sensor was used to keep track of LAI in an elevated CO 2<br />

experiment<br />

conducted in Florida (Pontailler et al., 2003). The vegetation studied<br />

was a scrub-oak natural ecosystem ma<strong>de</strong> up of three main tree species<br />

(Quercus myrtifolia, Q. geminata and Q. chapmannii). Four 4m 2 contrasted<br />

calibration plots were marked out in February and four similar plots were<br />

marked out in June. The vegetation was low in stature and we used a<br />

handheld version of the sensor equipped with a dual LCD display to measure<br />

NDVI (36 measurements per plot). Immediately after these measurements,<br />

the plots were manually <strong>de</strong>foliated, the area of a sub-sample of<br />

the leaves – ca. 0.1m 2 – was measured using a leaf area meter (LI-3100,<br />

Li-Cor, Nebraska, USA), and all leaves, including those sub-sampled, were<br />

dried to constant weight at 80°C and weighed. In these conditions, we<br />

could assess “true LAI” values from direct, <strong>de</strong>structive samples. The best<br />

fit between “true LAI” and the NDVI measurements was obtained using<br />

a negative exponential function (r 2 =0.987, figure 6A).<br />

We observed a mo<strong>de</strong>rate saturation effect in the range of values <strong>de</strong>termined<br />

here, making it possible to obtain reliable estimations of LAI up<br />

to 3 or even more. The explanation <strong>for</strong> this mo<strong>de</strong>rate saturation is that<br />

even if the canopy reflectance in the red band reaches an asymptote at<br />

LAI values of 2-3, its reflectance in the near-infrared continues to increase<br />

with an increase in leaf area (Peterson and Running, 1989; Soudani et<br />

al., 2006). Nevertheless, the accuracy of this technique <strong>de</strong>creases when<br />

LAI increases, and NDVI is also affected by background materials when<br />

LAI is low. Contrary to other field techniques used to assess LAI, the<br />

approach based on NDVI measurement has the advantage to consi<strong>de</strong>r<br />

green plant parts only, ignoring branches and woody stems. Also, groundbased<br />

NDVI is well adapted to low canopies where other techniques may<br />

be difficult to implement.<br />

4.2. Estimating biomass and ground cover<br />

The NDVI measurements are also useful to estimate biomass non-<strong>de</strong>structively.<br />

A good linear relationship was obtained between NDVI and harvested<br />

green biomass by Buttler and Landolt (unpublished data) in a peat<br />

bog stand in the East of France (figure 6B). As observed when per<strong>for</strong>ming


Part III – Chapter 4 253<br />

Figure 6: Use of NDVI <strong>for</strong> plant biomass studies. A. Relationship between NDVI<br />

and “true” LAI (leaf area in<strong>de</strong>x, total leaf tissue area per unit ground surface area)<br />

in a scrub oak ecosystem in Florida. B Relationship between NDVI and biomass in<br />

a peat bog stand.<br />

LAI measurements, saturation also occurs when <strong>de</strong>termining biomass in<br />

<strong>de</strong>nse plots. The ability of NDVI to discriminate between green vegetation<br />

and bare soil makes it also useful to <strong>de</strong>termine the ground cover of<br />

stands. This has to be consi<strong>de</strong>red carefully because <strong>de</strong>nsity insi<strong>de</strong> green<br />

spots often varies together with ground cover, and both are taken into<br />

account when per<strong>for</strong>ming measurements. This technique appears more<br />

adapted to assess trends rather than absolute values, even when a cautious<br />

calibration process is applied.


254 Ecosystem properties<br />

5. Comparison with satellite-based remote sensing data<br />

Despite the technological maturity of remote sensing technologies<br />

onboard of numerous satellites and the significant progress achieved <strong>for</strong><br />

the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> in this field, the potential use of remote sensing to monitor<br />

phenology and vegetation dynamics remains severely limited by atmospheric<br />

conditions in general and especially by the cloud cover (Soudani<br />

et al., 2008). Thus, ground-based NDVI measurements provi<strong>de</strong> the data<br />

nee<strong>de</strong>d <strong>for</strong> the calibration and validation of satellite observations and<br />

products. Figure 7 shows the NDVI temporal profiles measured <strong>for</strong> three<br />

consecutive years over a <strong>de</strong>ciduous mature <strong>for</strong>est in Barbeau Carboeurope<br />

site using our in situ NDVI sensor. These data are compared with those<br />

obtained from bands 1 (red) and 2 (near infrared) of Modis onboard Terra<br />

satellite plat<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> the same area. Both sensors show similar patterns and<br />

may be used to extract the main phenological markers that characterise<br />

the seasonality of vegetation in <strong>de</strong>ciduous <strong>for</strong>ests. Discrepancies between<br />

in situ NDVI sensor and Modis Terra based NDVI may be explained by<br />

numerous factors. First, an important reason <strong>for</strong> the observed discrepancies<br />

is the differences in the spectral responses of the two sensors. Shapes<br />

and bandwidths of spectral responses of Modis bands 1 and 2 are different<br />

from those of our in situ NDVI sensor. Second, other contributing<br />

factors inclu<strong>de</strong> atmospheric effects, and view and illumination conditions.<br />

Finally, differences in spatial resolution may also be important here<br />

because the area observed by the in situ NDVI sensor (around 100m²) is<br />

rather small compared to Modis pixel size (a few hectares).<br />

Figure 7: NDVI temporal profiles measured using a NDVI sensor located on top of<br />

a flux tower (squares, red lines) and <strong>de</strong>rived from Modis satellite data (circles, blue<br />

line) over three years in Barbeau Carboeurope oak site.


Part III – Chapter 4 255<br />

6. Conclusion<br />

The sensor <strong>de</strong>scribed in this chapter is rugged and maintenance-free. We<br />

<strong>de</strong>signed it ten years ago and we have used it since then in a variety of<br />

conditions where it always showed a satisfying reliability. For example,<br />

several units per<strong>for</strong>med continuous measurements on top of flux towers<br />

<strong>for</strong> six years without failure or noticeable drift. The cost of this instrument<br />

is af<strong>for</strong>dable, about 200€ without labour costs, and the instrument<br />

can be purchased from ESE laboratory (www.ese.u-psud.fr/). Our onground<br />

NDVI sensor appears well adapted to track vegetation phenology<br />

routinely, to assess leaf area in<strong>de</strong>x or ground cover in relatively sparse<br />

canopies and estimate standing biomass provi<strong>de</strong>d calibration is done.<br />

This sensor partly fills the lack of low-cost sensors available to scientists<br />

that are not ready to invest in expensive spectrometers to per<strong>for</strong>m simple<br />

spectral measurements.<br />

Authors’ references<br />

Jean-Yves Pontailler, Kamel Soudani:<br />

Université Paris-Sud 11, Écophysiologie végétale, bilan carboné et fonctionnement<br />

<strong>de</strong>s écosystèmes, Laboratoire Écologie, systématique, évolution,<br />

CNRS-UPS-AgroParisTech UMR 8079, Orsay, France<br />

Corresponding author: Kamel Soudani, kamel.soudani@u-psud.fr<br />

Aknowledgement<br />

The authors thank GIP ECOFOR and F-ORE-T « Observatoires <strong>de</strong><br />

Recherche en Environnement (ORE) sur le Fonctionnement <strong>de</strong>s<br />

Écosystèmes Forestiers » ECOFOR, INSU, Ministère <strong>de</strong> l’Enseignement<br />

Supérieur et <strong>de</strong> la Recherche <strong>for</strong> funding the NDVI project. We express<br />

our thanks to Eric Dufrêne who has strongly supported this project. We<br />

would like to express our profound gratitu<strong>de</strong> to Laurent Vanbostal and<br />

Daniel Berveiller <strong>for</strong> their help in manufacturing NDVI sensors and per<strong>for</strong>ming<br />

measurements. We also thank all our collaborators who were<br />

involved in the data collection process in all study sites.


256 Ecosystem properties<br />

References<br />

Bréda N., Soudani K., Bergonzini J.-C., 2003. Mesure <strong>de</strong> l’indice foliaire en<br />

<strong>for</strong>êt. Eco<strong>for</strong>, Paris, France.<br />

Ceulemans R., Pontailler J.-Y., Mau F., Guittet J., 1993. Leaf allometry in young<br />

poplar stands: reliability of leaf area in<strong>de</strong>x estimation, site and clone<br />

effects. Biomass and Bioenergy, 4, pp. 315-321.<br />

Delpierre N., Soudani K., François F., Köstner b., Pontailler J.-Y., Aubinet<br />

M., bernhofer C., Granier A., Grunwald T., Heinesch b., Longdoz b.,<br />

Misson L., Nikinmaa E., ourcival J.-M., Rambal S., Vesala T., Dufrêne<br />

E., 2009. Exceptional carbon uptake in European <strong>for</strong>ests during the<br />

warm spring of 2007: a data-mo<strong>de</strong>l analysis. Global Change Biology, 15,<br />

pp. 1455-1474.<br />

Elvidge C. D., Chen Z., 1995. Comparison of broad-band and narrow-band red<br />

and near-infrared vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 54,<br />

pp. 38-48.<br />

Granier A., Ceschia E., Damesin C., Dufrêne E., Epron D., Gross P., Lebaube<br />

S., Le Dantec V., Le Goff N., Lemoine D., Lucot E., Ottorini J.-M.,<br />

Pontailler J.-Y., Saugier B., 2000. The carbon balance of a young beech<br />

<strong>for</strong>est. Functional Ecology, 14, pp. 312-325.<br />

Kriegler F. J., Malila W. A., Nalepka R. F., Richardson W., 1969. Preprocessing<br />

trans<strong>for</strong>mations and their effect on multispectral recognition, in:<br />

Proceedings of the sixth International Symposium on Remote Sensing of<br />

Environment. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp. 97-131.<br />

Methy M., Fabreguettes J., Jardon F., Roy J., 1987. Design of a simple instrument<br />

<strong>for</strong> the measurement of red/far red ratio. Acta Oecologica, 8, pp. 281-290.<br />

Peterson D. L., Running S. W., 1989. Applications in <strong>for</strong>est science and<br />

management, in: Asrar G. (Ed.) Theory and applications of optical remote<br />

sensing. Wiley, New York, pp. 429-473.<br />

Pontailler J.-Y., Hymus G. J., Drake B. G., 2003. Estimation of leaf area in<strong>de</strong>x<br />

using ground-based remote sensed NDVI measurements: validation and<br />

comparison with two indirect techniques. Canadian Journal of Remote<br />

Sensing, 29, pp. 381-387.<br />

Rouse J. W., Haas R. H., Schell J. A., Deering D. W., 1973. Monitoring vegetation<br />

systems in the Great Plains with ERTS, in: Proceedings of the Third ERTS<br />

Symposium, 1, pp. 309-317.<br />

Running S. W., Nemani R. R., Heinsch F. A., Zhao M., Reeves M., Hashimoto<br />

H., 2004. A continuous satellite-<strong>de</strong>rived measure of global terrestrial<br />

primary production. BioScience, 54, pp. 547-560.<br />

Soudani K., le Maire G., Dufrêne E., François C., Delpierre N., Ulrich E.,<br />

Cecchini S., 2008. Evaluation of the onset of green-up in temperate<br />

<strong>de</strong>ciduous broadleaf <strong>for</strong>ests <strong>de</strong>rived from Mo<strong>de</strong>rate Resolution Imaging<br />

Spectroradiometer (Modis) data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112,<br />

pp. 2643-2655.


Part III – Chapter 4 257<br />

Soudani K., François C., le Maire G., Le Dantec V., Dufrêne E., 2006.<br />

Comparative analysis of Ikonos, Spot and ETM+ data <strong>for</strong> Leaf Area In<strong>de</strong>x<br />

estimation in temperate coniferous and <strong>de</strong>ciduous <strong>for</strong>est stands. Remote<br />

Sensing of Environment, 102, pp. 161-175.<br />

Thenkabail P. S., Smith R. B., De Pauw E. 2000. Hyperspectral vegetation<br />

indices and their relationship with agricultural crop characteristics.<br />

Remote Sensing of Environment, 71, pp. 158-182.<br />

Tucker, C.J. 1977. Use of near infrared/red radiance ratios <strong>for</strong> estimating<br />

vegetation biomass and physiological status, NASA/GSFC Report X-923-<br />

77-183, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA.<br />

Tucker C. J. 1979. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations <strong>for</strong><br />

monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 8, pp. 127-150.


IV<br />

INTEGRATED STUDIES


Chapter 1<br />

Integrated observation system<br />

<strong>for</strong> pelagic ecosystems and<br />

biogeochemical cycles in the oceans<br />

Lars Stemmann, Hervé Claustre, Fabrizio D’Ortenzio<br />

1. Exploring the un<strong>de</strong>r-sampled ocean at a time<br />

of global changes<br />

Our climate is changing at unprece<strong>de</strong>nted rates, and there is an urgent need<br />

to improve the observation at global scales of pelagic ecosystems biodiversity<br />

and functioning. The oceans constitute the largest habitats on Earth <strong>for</strong><br />

a highly diverse and numerous flora and fauna, and play a major role in the<br />

carbon cycle and climate. Ocean carbon sources and sinks are controlled<br />

by both physical (Sabine et al., 2004) and biological (Volk and Hoffert,<br />

1985) processes that take place at various temporal and spatial scales. Based<br />

on global biogeochemical mo<strong>de</strong>lling and on the use of paleoproxies from<br />

sedimentary archives, the sedimentation of biogenic particulate matter<br />

from the euphotic zones of the ocean, a process named biological carbon<br />

pump, was shown to contribute significantly to climate variability<br />

(Sarmiento and Le Quere, 1996; Volk and Hoffert, 1985). However, the<br />

uncertainties in our un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of the biological pump’s functioning<br />

in today’s oceans remain important. For example, recent reviews about<br />

the export of biogenic particles to the <strong>de</strong>ep ocean showed that there is no<br />

consensus on the mechanisms controlling its spatial and temporal variability<br />

(Boyd and Trull, 2007; Burd et al., 2010). In particular, the roles of<br />

zooplankton and bacteria are not well un<strong>de</strong>rstood.<br />

Large temporal and spatial scales of marine surface production can be<br />

studied using satellite data (see III, 3). Alternatively, un<strong>de</strong>rwater autonomous<br />

floats technology has improved, thus allowing the exploration of<br />

the <strong>de</strong>eper layers of pelagic environments (Claustre et al., 2010b; Johnson


262 Integrated studies<br />

et al., 2009). Run since almost a <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>, the international Argo project,<br />

which currently has an array of about 3,000 floats <strong>de</strong>ployed in the world<br />

ocean, has proven to be an invaluable tool in mo<strong>de</strong>rn physical oceanography<br />

(figure 1). The Argo project provi<strong>de</strong>s, on a routine basis and<br />

with unprece<strong>de</strong>nted <strong>de</strong>tail, the heat and salt content of the upper kilometre<br />

ocean, as well as water mass circulation. In addition, the BIO-Argo<br />

research group intends to add biogeochemical sensors to the current floats<br />

(Claustre et al., 2010a; 2010b; IOCCG, 2011).<br />

To summarise individual researchers as well as agencies have recognised<br />

the fact that autonomous plat<strong>for</strong>ms array could provi<strong>de</strong> 3D in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

not attainable by satellite plat<strong>for</strong>ms, where the vertical dimension is missing.<br />

Such a plat<strong>for</strong>m can also <strong>de</strong>termine near surface properties when<br />

cloud cover impe<strong>de</strong>s observations from space. There<strong>for</strong>e, it seems useful<br />

and timely to coordinate the work of different groups to obtain coherent<br />

data sets to <strong>de</strong>termine global patterns of nutrients, plankton and marine<br />

particles distribution in the oceans. Until now, studies of the biological<br />

pump based on Argo floats have used chemical or physical sensors, and<br />

have there<strong>for</strong>e overlooked the effects of living organisms. This is because<br />

available sensors were not adapted to record individual organisms but<br />

rather did bulk measurements of their biomasses. Bio-optical and imaging<br />

sensors <strong>de</strong>dicated to the i<strong>de</strong>ntification and quantification of organisms<br />

living in pelagic environments are now being <strong>de</strong>veloped (see II, 2). The<br />

current limitation of Argo floats shall soon be overcome thanks to the<br />

miniaturisation of these sensors, which make them compatible <strong>for</strong> implementation<br />

on the Argo floats.<br />

The abundance and size distribution of plankton and particles are among<br />

the relevant variables of pelagic environments that are not measured with<br />

standard floats (but see III, 3 <strong>for</strong> remote sensing techniques). The analysis<br />

of the size distribution of planktonic taxa is important because metabolic<br />

processes and many ecological traits, including population abundance,<br />

growth rate and productivity, spatial niche, trophic, competitive and<br />

facilitative relationships between species, are influenced by the body<br />

size of the organism (Brown et al., 2004; Gillooly, 2000; 2001; 2002). In<br />

addition, most marine organisms are opportunistic fee<strong>de</strong>rs and their prey<br />

size is limited by the diameter of their mouth. There<strong>for</strong>e, predator–prey<br />

relationships are, in many marine systems, importantly <strong>de</strong>termined by<br />

size (Hansen et al., 1997; Jennings and Warr, 2003). Furthermore, the<br />

particle diameter can <strong>de</strong>scribe multiple particle properties such as mass<br />

and settling speed or flux (Alldredge and Gotschalk, 1988), rate of colonisation<br />

by microbes and zooplankton (Kiørboe, 2000; Kiørboe et al.,<br />

2002, 2004) and coagulation rate (Jackson, 1990). The rate of biogeochemical<br />

activity such as aggregate remineralisation by bacterial activity<br />

or zooplankton consumption can also be proportional to the size of


Part IV – Chapter 1 263<br />

Figure 1: The Argo float is a global array of autonomous floats measuring pressure,<br />

temperature and salinity. A. Map showing the location of 3161 Argo floats in the<br />

world ocean (in May 2010, http://www.argo.ucsd.edu/). B. Schematic operating<br />

sequence of an Argo float. See section 2 <strong>for</strong> a full explanation of the sampling<br />

strategy and see figure 2 <strong>for</strong> an image of the <strong>de</strong>ployment of a Provor float. © Argo,<br />

© jcommops.<br />

particles and plankton (Kiørboe and Thygesen, 2001; Ploug and Grossart,<br />

2000). Hence, because size of organisms or particles captures so many<br />

aspects of ecosystem functioning, the size distribution of plankton and


264 Integrated studies<br />

particles in a volume of water can be used to synthesise a succession of<br />

co-varying traits into a single dimension (Woodward et al., 2005).<br />

Based on autonomous vehicles equipped with bio-optical sensors, pilot<br />

projects were launched or are planed <strong>for</strong> studying the size distribution<br />

of pelagic communities at different temporal and spatial scales (Boss et<br />

al., 2008; Kortzinger et al., 2004; Niewiadomska et al., 2008). If networks<br />

and arrays are implemented from these pilot projects to coordinate<br />

the ef<strong>for</strong>ts at the international level, a revolution in biological<br />

and biogeochemical oceanography will happen. The community will<br />

have access to an unprece<strong>de</strong>nted observational array of vertically<br />

resolved “biogeochemical” and ecological variables (see next section<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>de</strong>tails). Developing such an in situ automated observation system<br />

will constitute an essential step towards a better un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of biogeochemical<br />

cycles and ecosystem dynamics, especially at spatial and<br />

temporal scales that have been unexplored until now. Two main outcomes<br />

can be expected from a well-<strong>de</strong>signed integrated observation<br />

system (Claustre et al., 2010a). The scientific outcomes inclu<strong>de</strong> a better<br />

exploration and an improved un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of both present state<br />

and change and variability in ocean biology and biogeochemistry over<br />

a large range of spatial and temporal scales (see figure 1). Associated<br />

with this, the reduction of uncertainties in the estimation of biogeochemical<br />

fluxes is an obvious target and the assessment of zooplankton<br />

resources <strong>for</strong> higher trophic levels (fish) is also an achievable important<br />

goal.<br />

Besi<strong>de</strong> these scientific objectives, the operational and long-term outcomes<br />

are the <strong>de</strong>velopment of sound predictions of ocean biogeochemistry<br />

and ecosystem dynamics as well as the <strong>de</strong>livery of real-time<br />

and open-access data to scientists, users and <strong>de</strong>cision makers. It is also<br />

expected that reduced uncertainties will result in better policy. The present<br />

chapter reviews recent sensor technical <strong>de</strong>velopments and scientific<br />

results from pilot projects that investigated pelagic ecosystems using<br />

autonomous vehicles. It is a synthesis of two recent articles (Claustre<br />

et al., 2010b; Stemmann and Boss, 2012). The following sections were<br />

set to i) <strong>de</strong>scribe autonomous vehicles, ii) <strong>de</strong>scribe miniaturised present<br />

and future sensors that can <strong>de</strong>scribe habitats (physical and geochemical<br />

environment) and plankton communities (phyto and zooplankton), iii)<br />

suggest framework <strong>for</strong> data control and quality and iv) propose their<br />

integration in mo<strong>de</strong>lling and observing systems.


Part IV – Chapter 1 265<br />

2. The various plat<strong>for</strong>ms in support of a pelagic autonomous<br />

observation system<br />

Autonomous floats spend most of their life drifting at <strong>de</strong>pth where they<br />

are stabilised by being neutrally buoyant at the “parking <strong>de</strong>pth” pressure<br />

where they have a <strong>de</strong>nsity equal to the ambient pressure and a compressibility<br />

that is less than that of sea water (figure 2A). In the Argo mo<strong>de</strong>, the<br />

floats pump fluid into an external blad<strong>de</strong>r at typically 10-day intervals,<br />

and rise to the surface <strong>for</strong> about 6 hours while measuring temperature and<br />

salinity. Satellites <strong>de</strong>termine the position of the floats when they surface,<br />

and receive the data transmitted by the floats. The blad<strong>de</strong>r then <strong>de</strong>flates<br />

and the float returns to its original <strong>de</strong>nsity and sinks to drift until the<br />

cycle is repeated. The floats can also be configured remotely to another<br />

prescribed resting <strong>de</strong>pth. In the Argo array, floats are <strong>de</strong>signed to make<br />

about 150 such cycles. With their long lasting capacities (3 years in the<br />

Argo array), floats are particularly useful to follow the temporal dynamics<br />

of the pelagic ecosystems in large-scale physical structures such as long<br />

lasting gyres.<br />

In contrast to floats, gli<strong>de</strong>rs can be steered and maintained in particular<br />

areas providing the spatial structure <strong>for</strong> all variables measured by the<br />

sensors on-board at relatively slow speed (30km.day -1 horizontally, see<br />

figure 2B). They are suitable plat<strong>for</strong>ms <strong>for</strong> any sustained observational<br />

system aimed at monitoring bio-physical coupling at the coastal interface<br />

between shelf and open ocean because they can operate at sub- to<br />

meso-scale (1km to 100km). The improvements in gli<strong>de</strong>r technology were<br />

accompanied by the emergence of gli<strong>de</strong>r ports or centres. These logistical<br />

centres, very often in the proximity of a laboratory, are key to the success<br />

of these systems. The <strong>de</strong>velopment of a “global bio gli<strong>de</strong>r network”<br />

in the near future will have to rely on a cluster of these local, national or<br />

international (e.g. Everyone’s gliding observatories) centres. The endurance<br />

(around 4 months) and range (2000km) of gli<strong>de</strong>rs constrain the procedure<br />

by requiring repetitive <strong>de</strong>ployments, but gli<strong>de</strong>rs are already capable<br />

to cover large parts of the global ocean. On a longer term and with the<br />

continuing improvement of technology (e.g. increasing endurance and<br />

range), transoceanic and repeated transects from gli<strong>de</strong>r port to gli<strong>de</strong>r port<br />

will likely become possible. Animal-borne systems (see figure 2C) can<br />

nicely complement gli<strong>de</strong>rs and floats (Teo et al., 2009). Recently, animalborne<br />

instruments have been <strong>de</strong>signed and implemented to provi<strong>de</strong> in situ<br />

hydrographic data from parts of the oceans where little or no other data<br />

are currently available such as <strong>for</strong> example the Southern ocean (Bailleul<br />

et al., 2010; Roquet et al., 2011). The animal-plat<strong>for</strong>m community is only<br />

beginning and no continuous <strong>de</strong>ployments is un<strong>de</strong>rway (see I, 1 <strong>for</strong> more<br />

<strong>de</strong>tails).


266 Integrated studies<br />

Figure 2: Three plat<strong>for</strong>ms used to study the pelagic environment. A. PRoVoR<br />

float about to be immerged in the ocean <strong>for</strong> a three years journey (© Ifremer). B.<br />

Gli<strong>de</strong>r (© DR). C. Elephant seal equipped with sensors glued at on the top of his<br />

head (©C. Guinet/CNRS).


Part IV – Chapter 1 267<br />

3. Relevant pelagic ecosystem variables at global scales<br />

3.1. Monitoring the pelagic habitats with core physical and geochemical<br />

variables<br />

The broad-scale global array of temperature and salinity profiling floats,<br />

known as Argo, has already grown to be a major component of the ocean<br />

observing system. The final array of 3,000 floats now provi<strong>de</strong>s 100,000<br />

temperature/salinity (T/S) profiles and velocity measurements per year<br />

distributed over the global oceans at an average 3-<strong>de</strong>gree spacing (figure<br />

1). Floats cycle at a 2,000m <strong>de</strong>pth every 10 days, with 3-4 year lifetimes<br />

<strong>for</strong> individual instruments. All Argo data are publically available<br />

in near real-time via the global data assembly centers (GDACs) after an<br />

automated quality control (QC), and in scientifically quality controlled<br />

<strong>for</strong>m, <strong>de</strong>layed mo<strong>de</strong> data, via the GDACs within six months of collection.<br />

Hence, basic physical data about the salinity and temperature of<br />

the pelagic habitat are readily available. In addition to these physical sensors,<br />

geochemical sensors are now being <strong>de</strong>veloped and <strong>de</strong>ployed on Argo<br />

floats. Oxygen sensors are currently being installed on floats <strong>for</strong> multiyear<br />

periods with little or no drift in sensor response (Kortzinger et al.,<br />

2004; Riser and Johnson, 2008). As <strong>for</strong> June 2009, more than 200 floats<br />

have been <strong>de</strong>ployed with oxygen sensors, with about 150 currently active<br />

(Johnson et al., 2009). Nitrate sensors based on direct optical <strong>de</strong>tection<br />

are now also <strong>de</strong>ployed on floats, and they operate <strong>for</strong> more than 500 days<br />

(Johnson and Coletti, 2002). Detection limits are on the or<strong>de</strong>r of 0.5 to<br />

1μM. Although not sufficient to measure euphotic zone nitrate concentrations<br />

in many regions, these sensors can resolve annual cycles in mesotrophic,<br />

bloom-<strong>for</strong>ming regions. Measurements with gas tension <strong>de</strong>vices<br />

(McNeil et al., 2006) can be combined with oxygen concentrations to<br />

<strong>de</strong>termine the partial pressure of molecular nitrogen (N 2<br />

) in seawater.<br />

Finally, prototype pCO 2<br />

sensors were tested on floats but several technical<br />

problems (long time constants of sensors) have to be solved be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

their operational use. Yet, major improvements in the pCO 2<br />

sensors can<br />

be expected in the near future.<br />

Bio-optical sensor technologies have also been refined so that they can<br />

now be <strong>de</strong>ployed on autonomous plat<strong>for</strong>ms (Bishop and Wood, 2009;<br />

Boss et al., 2008). Particle load is the main driver of water turbidity or<br />

transparency in the open ocean. Turbidity can be quantified by the<br />

measurement of the backscattering coefficient using a backscattering<br />

metre, while transparency is measured by the particle attenuation coefficient<br />

using a transmissometer. In open ocean waters, particulate organic<br />

carbon (POC) is the main source of particles, and both optical measurements<br />

can be converted to a concentration of POC with reasonable


268 Integrated studies<br />

accuracy (Bishop and Wood, 2009). The long-term <strong>de</strong>ployment of biooptical<br />

sensors is possible on Argo floats because these plat<strong>for</strong>ms spend<br />

much of their time <strong>de</strong>ep down in cold and dark waters. Consequently,<br />

biofouling is less of an issue than when sensors are permanently fixed<br />

in the upper ocean, <strong>for</strong> example, on moorings, or on benthic surfaces<br />

(see III, 1).<br />

3.2. Monitoring the plankton communities<br />

The BIO-Argo community has already implemented multispectral optical<br />

sensors to estimate chlorophyll-a as a proxy <strong>for</strong> phytoplankton biomass.<br />

It can be measured by fluorescence, and miniature fluorescence<br />

sensors are now available to equip a variety of plat<strong>for</strong>ms (e.g. gli<strong>de</strong>rs,<br />

floats, animals). When converting chlorophyll-a data into biomass data,<br />

one must however take into account the issues of variable pigment to<br />

carbon ratios and variable fluorescence to chlorophyll concentration<br />

ratios, which are caused by non photochemical quenching, changes in<br />

species composition, and changes in temperature. Chlorophyll fluorescence<br />

and light scattering (proxy <strong>for</strong> POC) in the upper 1000m were<br />

measured in the North Atlantic <strong>for</strong> three years (Boss et al., 2008). In the<br />

future, coccolithophorids carbonate shells might be <strong>de</strong>tected from the<br />

background of nano-sized phytoplankton cells by their specific optical<br />

birefringence properties (Guay and Bishop, 2002).<br />

Much less work has been carried out to characterise the zooplankton,<br />

which constitutes a major trophic level of pelagic ecosystems. Checkley<br />

et al. (2008) combined a sounding oceanographic lagrangian observer<br />

float with a laser optical plankton counter (LOPC) and a fluorometer to<br />

make an autonomous biological profiler, the SOLOPC. The instrument<br />

senses plankton and other particles over a size range of 100µm to 1cm<br />

in profiles to 300m in <strong>de</strong>pth and sends data ashore via satellite. Objects<br />

sensed by the LOPC inclu<strong>de</strong> aggregates and zooplankton, the larger of<br />

which can be distinguished from one another by their transparency. The<br />

instrument was <strong>de</strong>ployed during several weeks in the Cali<strong>for</strong>nian current<br />

system (Checkley et al., 2008). In the future, these imaging systems will<br />

make monitoring particles and zooplankton at the same time possible<br />

(see II, 2).<br />

Acoustic sensors from gli<strong>de</strong>rs (Davis et al., 2008) or from floats were<br />

also used to <strong>de</strong>tect plankton and non living particles (Jaffe et al., 2007).<br />

But the interpretation of acoustic backscatter at a single frequency is<br />

complicated by several factors. Marked spatial changes in intensity of<br />

acoustic backscatter do not necessarily imply changes in zooplankton or<br />

fish biomasses, as differences in body size, species composition, elastic<br />

properties of the animals, or orientation, can also markedly influence


Part IV – Chapter 1 269<br />

acoustic signals (Roberts and Jaffe, 2007; 2008). These instruments have<br />

not yet been <strong>de</strong>ployed over long periods of time but we expect that a<br />

strong <strong>de</strong>velopment and wi<strong>de</strong> use of these instruments will be seen the<br />

next <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>.<br />

The use of flow cytometry <strong>for</strong> plankton organisms smaller than about<br />

20μm (pico and nano-size range) provi<strong>de</strong>s an alternate way to automatically<br />

obtain taxonomic in<strong>for</strong>mation in this size range (Olson and<br />

Sosik, 2007). Molecular sensors are also now being <strong>de</strong>veloped <strong>for</strong> coastal<br />

observatories to remotely <strong>de</strong>tect marine microbes and small invertebrate<br />

(Scholin et al., 2009). In situ flow cytometers and molecular sensors represent<br />

a promising avenue in this respect, although their size and energy<br />

consumption prevent them, <strong>for</strong> the moment, from being part of an operational<br />

open ocean observation system, <strong>for</strong> which long term autonomy and<br />

cost efficient sensors are important.<br />

3.3. From observations to predictions using mo<strong>de</strong>lling framework<br />

Building a global observation system to <strong>de</strong>scribe and predict the functioning<br />

of the pelagic ecosystem requires a stepwise approach with regionalscale,<br />

pilot projects. Pilot studies that combine in situ sensors <strong>de</strong>ployed<br />

on long-endurance plat<strong>for</strong>ms with satellite sensors, ship cruises, and data<br />

assimilation of biogeochemical-ecological mo<strong>de</strong>ls must be carried on to<br />

obtain a proof of the concept. In particular, data assimilation into different<br />

types of mo<strong>de</strong>ls is essential to interpret spatial and temporal variability,<br />

and to convert the sum of local measurements into quantitative rate<br />

estimates over large regions of the ocean.<br />

For more than two <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s, pelagic ecosystem mo<strong>de</strong>ling has focused on<br />

the role and functioning of ecosystem components <strong>de</strong>scribed as “boxes”.<br />

In these box mo<strong>de</strong>ls, the marine ecosystem is divi<strong>de</strong>d into several<br />

dynamic compartments. The first mo<strong>de</strong>ls of marine ecosystems dynamics<br />

contained only one variable, the phytoplankton (Fleming, 1939; Riley<br />

and Bumpus, 1946), but mo<strong>de</strong>ls including three variables – nutrient, phytoplankton,<br />

zooplankton – were quickly <strong>de</strong>veloped (Riley et al., 1949).<br />

Thereafter, the <strong>de</strong>velopment of computers enabled the number of variables<br />

to increase up to seven by adding bacteria, particulate and dissolved<br />

<strong>de</strong>tritus and ammonia as a second source of nutriment (Fasham et al.,<br />

1990). This latter mo<strong>de</strong>l became a standard <strong>for</strong> the subsequent <strong>de</strong>velopment<br />

of biogeochemical mo<strong>de</strong>ls, including the <strong>de</strong>velopment of biogeochemical<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>ls with up to 11 compartments (Aumont et al., 2003; Le<br />

Quere et al., 2005) or mo<strong>de</strong>ls involving a greater number of phytoplankton<br />

types from which merging communities can be extracted (Follows<br />

et al., 2007). Despite these improvements, little attention has been paid


270 Integrated studies<br />

Figure 3: Conceptual scheme showing how data from the new generations of sensors<br />

can be integrated into improved mo<strong>de</strong>ls of the pelagic ecosystems. Improved mo<strong>de</strong>ls<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong> coupled dynamics of nutrients (blue ellipse), size-structured populations of<br />

phytoplankton (P, green symbols) and zooplankton (Z, dark orange symbols) and a<br />

size-structured pool of <strong>de</strong>tritus (D, orange symbols) in the upper ocean layer and the<br />

midwater layer. Black arrows represent the flow of mass from one compartment to<br />

the other. The flow of mass of <strong>de</strong>tritus due to physical processes (mixing and particle<br />

settling) from the upper to the midwater layer <strong>de</strong>pends on the size of <strong>de</strong>tritus. Grey<br />

arrows represent mass transfer between the size classes within the same group. In<br />

the future, <strong>de</strong>tritus and some zooplankton groups <strong>de</strong>tected using imaging systems<br />

may be replaced by a size-based <strong>de</strong>scription. However, not all compartments may be<br />

<strong>de</strong>scribed with size when size is less important <strong>for</strong> bio-geochemical processes or less<br />

variable. This is particularly true <strong>for</strong> the phytoplankton because these species don’t<br />

prey on each other or they have very specific functions (N 2<br />

fixators, calcifiers) and<br />

several zooplankton taxa (tunicates, jellyfish). Crustaceans may be good candidate<br />

<strong>for</strong> a size based <strong>de</strong>scription because they share many metabolic pathways and life<br />

cycle dynamics. The proposed mo<strong>de</strong>l should be simple enough to be inclu<strong>de</strong>d in<br />

3D biogeochemical mo<strong>de</strong>ls. Only vertical processes are represented here and landoceans<br />

transports or bentho-pelagic coupling are not represented.


Part IV – Chapter 1 271<br />

to zooplankton because of the complexity of this group and the small<br />

number of global data sets (Carlotti and Poggiale, 2010). The zooplankton<br />

is often represented as a closure variable with fixed rates in<br />

compartment mo<strong>de</strong>ls while their dynamic trophic interactions with<br />

the phytoplankton may be important to un<strong>de</strong>rstand the ecosystem<br />

dynamics. Robust mo<strong>de</strong>ls relating climate change to fish production<br />

require also an a<strong>de</strong>quate <strong>de</strong>scription of the zooplanktonic intermediaries<br />

between phytoplankton and fish in end-to-end mo<strong>de</strong>ls. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

acquisition of in situ data is nee<strong>de</strong>d <strong>for</strong> testing mechanistic end-to-end<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>ls and optimising the balance between fi<strong>de</strong>lity and simplicity in<br />

the zooplankton component.<br />

At the same time, the <strong>de</strong>eper ocean (below the mixed layer) was treated<br />

as a black box because of the lack of data. In particular, the <strong>de</strong>scription<br />

of particle sinking to the <strong>de</strong>ep oceans still mostly relies on exponential<br />

or power law functions (Armstrong et al., 2002; betzer et al., 1984;<br />

Martin et al., 1987; Suess, 1980). However, marine particle fluxes display<br />

strong regional and temporal variability in response to production<br />

regimes and their seasonality. The relationship between surface ocean<br />

ecosystem structure and variability is not captured by these simplified<br />

approaches.<br />

A recent mo<strong>de</strong>l (Gehlen et al., 2006; Kriest and Evans, 2000) provi<strong>de</strong>s<br />

an interesting alternative suitable <strong>for</strong> global scale applications (figure 3).<br />

It relies on the explicit parameterisation of particle interactions (aggregation/disaggregation)<br />

where particle number and size are state variables.<br />

The sinking speed is computed as a function of particle size distribution.<br />

This approach relies however on simplifying assumptions that have<br />

not been fully validated by comparing with data on particle dynamics.<br />

For instance, the <strong>de</strong>scription of the particle size spectrum by a constant<br />

exponent contradicts observations where variability with <strong>de</strong>pth of<br />

the latter was reported (Guidi et al., 2009). This variability most likely<br />

reflects the impact of zooplankton feeding and microbial <strong>de</strong>gradation<br />

on particle size spectra (Stemmann et al., 2004a; 2004b). In this case,<br />

measuring organisms and particles size distribution would also lead to<br />

general improvement of the <strong>de</strong>scription and dynamics of zooplankton<br />

in mo<strong>de</strong>ls.


272 Integrated studies<br />

Figure 4: Schematic representation of the outcomes of a future array of oceanic<br />

floats equipped with biological sensors to measure various pelagic ecosystems<br />

components as well as standard physical and chemical sensors. In the future, the<br />

nutrient(N)-phytoplankton(P)-zooplankton(Z)-<strong>de</strong>tritus(D) conceptual scheme<br />

of most biogeochemical mo<strong>de</strong>ls will be quantified by the observation of new<br />

ecosystem components.<br />

4. The key to success: agreed procedures, data management<br />

and distribution<br />

In principle, the different observational approaches from ships, satellites,<br />

or autonomous vectors can be regar<strong>de</strong>d as stand-alone initiatives with<br />

their own rationales, objectives, analysis tools and synthesis products. In<br />

fact, this was the path followed previously, even though many scientists<br />

are often involved in more than one approach. Overcoming the separa-


Part IV – Chapter 1 273<br />

tion between the different observational approaches is a major objective<br />

<strong>for</strong> the scientific community <strong>for</strong> the next <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>.<br />

The technology <strong>for</strong> observing key oceanic biogeochemistry and ecosystem<br />

variables has progressively matured to the point where it is now amenable to<br />

a global dissemination (figure 4). Additionally, data sources will be much<br />

more diverse than today, going essentially from ship-based data acquisition<br />

to an increased contribution of data acquired through remotely operated<br />

plat<strong>for</strong>ms. Within a few years, our community will thus acquire tremendous<br />

amounts of biological data in addition to the standard physical and<br />

chemical data. An integrated observation system will be operationally useful<br />

and scientifically relevant if and only if this huge data acquisition ef<strong>for</strong>t<br />

is supported by an efficient data management system, able to meet both<br />

basic scientific and operational goals. In<strong>de</strong>ed, the success in implementing<br />

these new cost effective technologies in our observation strategy will heavily<br />

rely on our capacity to make all data easily available.<br />

Nevertheless, such data management system is still to be <strong>de</strong>signed and implemented.<br />

The important criteria that preclu<strong>de</strong> this implementation are, notably,<br />

the availability of real-time quality-controlled (QC) data <strong>for</strong> operational<br />

applications and the production of <strong>de</strong>layed-mo<strong>de</strong>l QC data required <strong>for</strong><br />

climate-related studies. In some ways, these prerequisites are orthogonal to<br />

the historic habits or constraint in relation with biological data management.<br />

First of all, with the exception of satellite data, biologists were not used to<br />

the mana gement of very large datasets because most biological data acquisition<br />

was done during discrete measurements per<strong>for</strong>med from ship-based<br />

plat<strong>for</strong>ms. Secondly, there are generally some hurdles to make biological<br />

data publically available. While ef<strong>for</strong>ts in this direction are un<strong>de</strong>rway, much<br />

remains to be done and the community has to consi<strong>de</strong>r this aspect of data<br />

management as a priority. Finally, and in relation with the preceding point,<br />

the biological oceanographer community is even less used to the constraints<br />

involved in the production and distribution of data in near-to-real-time. A<br />

technological evolution is thus required in the way we manage data to guarantee<br />

public access and to <strong>de</strong>liver real-time data and products, when required.<br />

This likely represents the most challenging issue <strong>for</strong> our community, at least<br />

as challenging as the required technological <strong>de</strong>velopments themselves.<br />

Authors’ references<br />

Lars Stemmann, Hervé Claustre, Fabrizio D’Ortenzio:<br />

Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Laboratoire d’Océanographie <strong>de</strong> Villefranche,<br />

UPMC-CNRS UMR 7093, Villefranche-sur-Mer, France.<br />

Corresponding author: Lars Stemmann, stemmann@obs-vlfr.fr


274 Integrated studies<br />

Aknowledgement<br />

This work is a synthesis of two recent articles (Claustre et al., 2010b;<br />

Stemmann and Boss, 2012). Authors were supported by funding from<br />

7th European Framework Program (Research Infrastructure JERICO and<br />

GRooM projects). Lars Stemmann is supported by the CNRS/UPMC<br />

Chaire on Biodiversity and Functioning of Pelagic Ecosystems.<br />

References<br />

Alldredge A. L., Gotschalk C., 1988. In situ settling behavior of marine snow.<br />

Limnology and Oceanography, 33, pp. 339-351.<br />

Armstrong R. A., Lee C., Hedges J. I., Honjo S., Wakeham S. G., 2001. A new,<br />

mechanistic mo<strong>de</strong>l <strong>for</strong> organic carbon fluxes in the ocean based on the<br />

quantitative association of POC with ballast minerals. Deep Sea Research<br />

Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 49, pp. 219-236.<br />

Aumont O., Maier-Reimer E., Blain S., Monfray P., 2003. An ecosystem mo<strong>de</strong>l of<br />

the global ocean including Fe, Si, P colimitations. Global Biogeochemical<br />

Cycles, 17, pp. 1060-1083.<br />

Bailleul F., Authier M., Ducatez S., Roquet F., Charrassin J. B., Cherel Y.,<br />

Guinet C., 2010. Looking at the unseen: combining animal bio-logging<br />

and stable isotopes to reveal a shift in the ecological niche of a <strong>de</strong>ep diving<br />

predator. Ecography, 33, pp. 709-719.<br />

Betzer P. R., Showers W. J., Laws E. A., Winn C. D., Ditullio G. R., Kroopnick<br />

P. M., 1984. Primary productivity and particle fluxes on a transect of<br />

the Equator at 153°W in the Pacific Ocean. Deep Sea Research Part I:<br />

Oceanographic Research Papers, 31, pp. 1-11.<br />

Bishop J. K. B., Wood T. J., 2009. Year-round observations of carbon biomass<br />

and flux variability in the Southern Ocean. Global Biogeochemical<br />

Cycles, 23, pp. 1-12.<br />

Boss E., Swift D., Taylor L., Brickley P., Zaneveld R., Riser S., Perry M. J.,<br />

Strutton P. G., 2008. Observations of pigment and particle distributions<br />

in the western North Atlantic from an autonomous float and ocean color<br />

satellite. Limnology and Oceanography, 53, pp. 2112-2122.<br />

Boyd P. W., Trull T. W., 2007. Un<strong>de</strong>rstanding the export of biogenic particles<br />

in oceanic waters: is there consensus? Progress in Oceanography, 72,<br />

pp. 276-312.<br />

Brown J. H., Gillooly J. F., Allen A. P., Savage V. M., West G. B., 2004. Toward<br />

a metabolic theory of <strong>ecology</strong>. Ecology, 85, pp. 1771-1789.<br />

Burd A. B., Hansell D. A., Steinberg D. K., An<strong>de</strong>rson T. R., Aristegui J., Baltar<br />

F., Beaupré S. R., Buesseler K. O., DeHairs F., Jackson G. A., Kadko D. C.,<br />

Koppelmann R., Lampitt R. S., Nagata T., Reinthaler T., Robinson C.,<br />

Robison B. H., Tamburini C., Tanaka T., 2010. Assessing the apparent


Part IV – Chapter 1 275<br />

imbalance between geochemical and biochemical indicators of mesoand<br />

bathypelagic biological activity: what the is wrong with present<br />

calculations of carbon budgets? Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies<br />

in Oceanography, 57, pp. 1557-1571.<br />

Carlotti F., Poggiale J. C., 2010. Towards methodological approaches to<br />

implement the zooplankton component in “end to end” food-web mo<strong>de</strong>ls.<br />

Progress in Oceanography, 84, pp. 20-38.<br />

Checkley D. M., Davis R. E., Herman A. W., Jackson G. A., Beanlands B.,<br />

Regier L. A., 2008. Assessing plankton and other particles in situ with the<br />

SOLOPC. Limnology and Oceanography, 53, pp. 2123-2136.<br />

Claustre H., Antoine D., Boehme L., Boss E., D’Ortenzio F., Fanton d’Andon<br />

O., Guinet C., Gruber N., Han<strong>de</strong>gard N. O., Hood M., Johnson K.,<br />

Körtzinger A., Lampitt R., LeTraon P.-Y., Lequéré C., Lewis M., Perry<br />

M.-J., Platt T., Roemmich D., Sathyendranath S., Testor P., Send U., Yo<strong>de</strong>r<br />

J., 2010a. Gui<strong>de</strong>lines towards an integrated ocean observation system <strong>for</strong><br />

ecosystems and biogeochemical cycles, in: Hall J., Harrison D. E., Stammer<br />

D. (Eds.), Proceedings of OceanObs’09: Sustained Ocean Observations<br />

and In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> Society. ESA Publication WPP-306.<br />

Claustre H., Bishop J., Boss E., Bernard S., Berthon J.-F., Coatanoan C., Johnson<br />

K., Lotiker A., Ulloa O., Perry M. J., D’Ortenzio F., Fanton d’Andon O.,<br />

Uitz J., 2010b. Bio-optical profiling floats as new observational tools <strong>for</strong><br />

biogeochemical and ecosystem studies: Potential synergies with ocean<br />

color remote sensing, in: Hall J., Harrison D. E, Stammer D., (Eds.),<br />

Proceedings of OceanObs’09: Sustained Ocean Observations and In<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

<strong>for</strong> Society. ESA Publication WPP-306.<br />

Davis R. E., Ohman M. D., Rudnick D. L., Sherman J. T., Hodges B., 2008.<br />

Gli<strong>de</strong>r surveillance of physics and biology in the southern Cali<strong>for</strong>nia<br />

Current System. Limnology and Oceanography, 53, pp. 2151-2168.<br />

Fasham M. J. R., Duclow H. W., Mckelvie S. M., 1990. A nitrogen-based mo<strong>de</strong>l<br />

of plankton dynamics in the oceanic mixed layer. Journal of Marine<br />

Research, 48, pp. 591-639.<br />

Fleming R. H., 1939. The control of diatom populations by grazing. Journal du<br />

Conseil International pour l’Exploration <strong>de</strong> la Mer, 14, pp. 210-227.<br />

Follows M. J., Dutkiewicz S., Grant S., Chisholm S. W., 2007. Emergent<br />

biogeography of microbial communities in a mo<strong>de</strong>l ocean. Science, 315,<br />

pp. 1843-1846.<br />

Gehlen M., Bopp. L., Ernprin N., Aumont O., Heinze C., Raguencau O.,<br />

2006. Reconciling surface ocean productivity, export fluxes and sediment<br />

composition in a global biogeochemical ocean mo<strong>de</strong>l. Biogeosciences, 3,<br />

pp. 521-537.<br />

Gillooly J. F., 2000. Effect of body size and temperature on generation time in<br />

zooplankton. Journal of Plankton Research, 22, pp. 241-251.<br />

Gillooly J. F., Brown J. H., West G. B., Savage V. M., Charnov E. L., 2001. Effects<br />

of size and temperature on metabolic rate. Science, 293, pp. 2248-2251.


276 Integrated studies<br />

Gillooly J. F., Charnov E. L., West G. B., Savage V. M., Brown J. H., 2002. Effects<br />

of size and temperature on <strong>de</strong>velopmental time. Nature, 417, pp. 70-73.<br />

Guay C. K. H., Bishop J. K. B., 2002. A rapid birefringence method <strong>for</strong> measuring<br />

suspen<strong>de</strong>d CaCO3 concentrations in seawater. Deep Sea Research Part I:<br />

Oceanographic Research Papers, 49, pp. 197-210.<br />

Guidi L., Stemmann L., Jackson G. A., Ibanez F., Claustre H., Legendre L.,<br />

Picheral M., Gorsky G., 2009. Effects of phytoplankton community on<br />

production, size and export of large aggregates: A world-ocean analysis.<br />

Limnology and Oceanography, 54, pp. 1951-1963.<br />

Hansen P. J., Bjornsen P. K., Hansen B. W., 1997. Zooplankton grazing<br />

and growth – Scaling within the 2-2,000 micrometer body size range.<br />

Limnology and Oceanography, 42, pp. 687-704.<br />

IOCCG, 2011. Bio-Optical <strong>Sensors</strong> on Argo Floats, in: Claustre H. (Ed.),<br />

Reports of the International Ocean-Colour Coordinating Group, No. 11.<br />

IOCCG, Dartmouth, Canada.<br />

Jackson G. A., 1990. A mo<strong>de</strong>l of the <strong>for</strong>mation of marine algal flocs by physical<br />

coagulation processes. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research<br />

Papers, 37, pp. 1197-1211.<br />

Jaffe J. S., Glatts R., Schurgers C., Mirza D., Franks P. J. S., Roberts P., Simonet<br />

F., 2007. AUE: An autonomous float <strong>for</strong> monitoring the upper water<br />

column. Oceans 2007 – Europe, Vols 1-3, pp. 1392-1395.<br />

Jennings S., Warr K. J., 2003. Smaller predator-prey body size ratios in<br />

longer food chains. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270,<br />

pp. 1413-1417.<br />

Johnson K. S., Berelson W. M., Boss E., Chase Z., Claustre H., Emerson<br />

S. R., Gruber N., Kortzinger A., Perry M. J., Riser S. C., 2009. Observing<br />

biogeochemical cycles at global scales with profiling floats and gli<strong>de</strong>rs:<br />

Prospects <strong>for</strong> a global array. Oceanography, 22, pp. 216-225.<br />

Johnson K. S., Coletti L. J., 2002. In situ ultraviolet spectrophotometry <strong>for</strong> high<br />

resolution and long-term monitoring of nitrate, bromi<strong>de</strong> and bisulfi<strong>de</strong> in<br />

the ocean. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 49,<br />

pp. 1291-1305.<br />

Kiørboe T., 2000. Colonization of marine snow aggregates by invertebrate<br />

zooplankton: abundance, scaling, and possible role. Limnology and<br />

Oceanography, 45, pp. 479-484.<br />

Kiørboe T., Grossart H. P., Ploug H., Tang K., 2002. Mechanisms and rates of<br />

bacterial colonization of sinking aggregates. Applied and Environmental<br />

Microbiology, 68, pp. 3996-4006.<br />

Kiørboe T., Grossart H. P., Ploug H., Tang K., Auer B., 2004. Particle-associated<br />

flagellates: swimming patterns, colonization rates, and grazing on attached<br />

bacteria. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 35, pp. 141-152.<br />

Kiørboe T., Thygesen U. H., 2001. Fluid motion and solute distribution around<br />

sinking aggregates. – Implications <strong>for</strong> remote <strong>de</strong>tection by colonizing<br />

zooplankters. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 211, pp. 15-25.


Part IV – Chapter 1 277<br />

Kortzinger A., Schimanski J., Send U., Wallace D., 2004. The ocean takes a<br />

<strong>de</strong>ep breath. Science, 306, pp. 1337-1337.<br />

Kriest I., Evans G. T., 2000. A vertically resolved mo<strong>de</strong>l <strong>for</strong> phytoplankton<br />

aggregation. Proceedings of the Indian Aca<strong>de</strong>my of Sciences, Earth and<br />

Planetary Sciences, 109, pp. 453-469.<br />

Le Quere C., Harrison S. P., Prentice I. C., Buitenhuis E. T., Aumont O., Bopp. L.,<br />

Claustre H., Da Cunha L. C., Gei<strong>de</strong>r R., Giraud X., Klaas C., Kohfeld<br />

K. E., Legendre L., Manizza M., Platt T., Rivkin R. B., Sathyendranath S.,<br />

Uitz J., Watson A. J., Wolf-Gladrow D., 2005. Ecosystem dynamics based<br />

on plankton functional types <strong>for</strong> global ocean biogeochemistry mo<strong>de</strong>ls.<br />

Global Change Biology, 11, pp. 2016-2040.<br />

Martin J. H., Knauer G. A., Karl D. M., Broenkow W. W., 1987. VERTEX:<br />

Carbon cycling in the Northeast Pacific. Deep Sea Research Part I:<br />

Oceanographic Research Papers, 34, pp. 267-285.<br />

McNeil C., D’Asaro E., Johnson B., Horn M. I., 2006. A gas tension <strong>de</strong>vice<br />

with response times of minutes. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic<br />

Technology, 23, pp. 1539-1558.<br />

Niewiadomska K., Claustre H., Prieur L., d’Ortenzio F., 2008. Submesoscale<br />

physical-biogeochemical coupling across the Ligurian Current<br />

(northwestern Mediterranean) using a bio-optical gli<strong>de</strong>r. Limnology and<br />

Oceanography, 53, pp. 2210-2225.<br />

Olson R. J., Sosik H. M., 2007. A submersible imaging-in-flow instrument to<br />

analyze nano-and microplankton: imaging FlowCytobot. Limnology and<br />

Oceanography: Methods, 5, pp. 195-203.<br />

Ploug H., Grossart H. P., 2000. Bacterial growth and grazing on diatom<br />

aggregates: respiratory carbon turnover as a function of aggregate size and<br />

sinking velocity. Limnology and Oceanography, 45, pp. 1467-1475.<br />

Riley G. A., Bumpus D. F., 1946. Phytoplankton-zooplankton relationships on<br />

Georges Bank. Journal of Marine Research, 6, pp. 33-47.<br />

Riley G. A., Stommel H., Bumpus D. F., 1949. Quantitative <strong>ecology</strong> of the<br />

plankton of the western North Atlantic. Bulletin of the Bingham<br />

Oceanographic collection, 12, pp. 1-169.<br />

Riser S. C., Johnson K. S., 2008. Net production of oxygen in the subtropical<br />

ocean. Nature, 451, pp. 323-325.<br />

Roberts P. L. D., Jaffe J. S., 2007. Multiple angle acoustic classification<br />

of zooplankton. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121,<br />

pp. 2060-2070.<br />

Roberts P. L. D., Jaffe J. S., 2008. Classification of live, untethered zooplankton<br />

from observations of multiple-angle acoustic scatter. Journal of the<br />

Acoustical Society of America, 124, pp. 796-802.<br />

Roquet F., Charrassin J. B., Marchand S., Boehme L., Fedak M., Reverdin G.,<br />

Guinet C., 2011. Delayed-mo<strong>de</strong> calibration of hydrographic data obtained<br />

from animal-borne satellite relay data loggers. Journal of Atmospheric and<br />

Oceanic Technology, 28, pp. 787-801.


278 Integrated studies<br />

Sabine C. L., Feely R. A., Gruber N., Key R. M., Lee K., Bullister J. L.,<br />

Wanninkhof R., Wong C. S., Wallace D. W. R., Tilbrook B., Millero<br />

F. J., Peng T. H., Kozyr A., Ono T., Rios A. F., 2004. The oceanic sink <strong>for</strong><br />

anthropogenic CO 2<br />

. Science, 305, pp. 367-371.<br />

Sarmiento J. L., Le Quere C., 1996. Oceanic carbon dioxi<strong>de</strong> uptake in a mo<strong>de</strong>l<br />

of century-scale global warming. Science, 274, pp. 1346-1350.<br />

Scholin C., Doucette G., Jensen S., Roman B., Pargett D., Marin R., Preston<br />

C., Jones W., Feldman J., Everlove C., Harris A., Alvarado N., Massion<br />

E., Birch J., Greenfield D., Vrijenhoek R., Mikulski C., Jones K., 2009.<br />

Remote <strong>de</strong>tection of marine microbes, small invertebrates, harmful<br />

algae, and biotoxins using the environmental sample processor (ESP).<br />

Oceanography, 22 pp. 158-167.<br />

Stemmann L., Boss E., 2012. Plankton and particle size and packaging: from<br />

<strong>de</strong>termining optical properties to driving the biological pump. Annual<br />

Review of Marine Science, 4, in press.<br />

Stemmann L., Jackson G. A., Gorsky G., 2004a. A vertical mo<strong>de</strong>l of particle size<br />

distributions and fluxes in the midwater column that inclu<strong>de</strong>s biological<br />

and physical processes – Part II: application to a three year survey in<br />

the NW Mediterranean Sea. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic<br />

Research Papers, 51, pp. 885-908.<br />

Stemmann L., Jackson G. A., Ianson D., 2004b. A vertical mo<strong>de</strong>l of particle size<br />

distributions and fluxes in the midwater column that inclu<strong>de</strong>s biological<br />

and physical processes – Part I: mo<strong>de</strong>l <strong>for</strong>mulation. Deep Sea Research<br />

Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 51, pp. 865-884.<br />

Suess E., 1980. Particulate organic-carbon flux in the oceans – surface<br />

productivity and oxygen utilization. Nature, 288, pp. 260-263.<br />

Teo S. L. H., Ku<strong>de</strong>la R. M., Rais A., Perle C., Costa D. P., Block B. A., 2009.<br />

Estimating chlorophyll profiles from electronic tags <strong>de</strong>ployed on pelagic<br />

animals. Aquatic Biology, 5, pp. 195-207.<br />

Volk T., Hoffert M. I., 1985. Ocean carbon pumps: analysis of relative strengths<br />

and efficiencies in ocean-driven atmospheric CO 2<br />

changes, in: Sundquist<br />

E. T., Broecker W. S. (Eds.), The carbon cycle and atmospheric CO 2<br />

:<br />

Natural variations archean to present. Geophysical monography series,<br />

pp. 99-110.<br />

Woodward G., Ebenman B., Ernmerson M., Montoya J. M., Olesen J. M.,<br />

Valido A., Warren P. H., 2005. Body size in ecological networks. Trends in<br />

Ecology and Evolution, 20, pp. 402-409.


Chapter 2<br />

Tropical rain <strong>for</strong>est environmental<br />

sensors at the Nouragues experimental<br />

station, French Guiana<br />

Jérôme Chave, Philippe Gaucher, Maël Dewynter<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Although they only cover about 7-10% of landmasses, tropical <strong>for</strong>ests<br />

hold over two thirds of terrestrial biological diversity, and over 40%<br />

of its carbon stocks. It is there<strong>for</strong>e unsurprising that scientists and the<br />

public alike show so much interest in this biome. Historically, however,<br />

active research in tropical <strong>ecology</strong> was restricted to a few well-equipped<br />

research sites where scientists – mostly permanently based in North<br />

America and in Europe – could settle down from a few months to a few<br />

years to conduct their research program. In tropical rain<strong>for</strong>ests, large<br />

scale logging programs have been initiated only since the 1960s, as much<br />

of Europe and North America had already been <strong>de</strong><strong>for</strong>ested centuries<br />

ago. Thus, when it comes to <strong>for</strong>ested ecosystems, the fundamental difference<br />

between the tropical and the temperate zone is that the tropics<br />

still hold unlogged <strong>for</strong>ests, whereas the overall area of unlogged <strong>for</strong>ests<br />

in Europe and North America today cover less than a few hundreds<br />

of hectares. Ecological processes that take place in mixed old-growth,<br />

tropical rain<strong>for</strong>ests are different from that of plantations, and they call<br />

<strong>for</strong> different research methods and measurement techniques. In<strong>de</strong>ed, in<br />

plantations one or a few tree species dominate the ecosystem dynamics,<br />

trees are even-aged, and <strong>de</strong>composition and tree mortality are much<br />

lower than in natural <strong>for</strong>ests. Hence, spatial and temporal heterogeneity<br />

are both lower in plantations than in unmanaged tropical <strong>for</strong>ests<br />

(Ghazoul and Sheil, 2010).


280 Integrated studies<br />

Another peculiarity of the tropics is the prevalence of harmful diseases,<br />

a major impediment to welfare <strong>de</strong>velopment over the 20 th century, with<br />

diseases such as mosquito-borne viruses (yellow fever, <strong>de</strong>ngue fever,<br />

chikungunya) or various malaria strains. Thus epi<strong>de</strong>miological research<br />

has been a major impetus <strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>velopment of research programs in<br />

the tropics. In French Guiana, Institut Pasteur has been established as<br />

early as 1940, when research infrastructure in this French <strong>de</strong>partment<br />

was altogether lacking. Major tropical <strong>ecology</strong> programs were initiated<br />

based on the infrastructure provi<strong>de</strong>d by these epi<strong>de</strong>miological research<br />

programs, such as Panama’s antenna of the Smithsonian Institute first<br />

established on Barro Colorado Island, in an area that was disrupted in<br />

1913 by the flooding of Gatun lake, central Panama. An emerging concern<br />

<strong>for</strong> biological conservation during the 1970s motivated other programs,<br />

such as the Manu Biosphere Reserve, along a tributary of the<br />

rio Madre <strong>de</strong> Dios, South-east Peru, which was originally established to<br />

study the biology of the then endangered black caiman. None of these<br />

initiatives were primarily driven by issues in environmental science.<br />

Capacity building in tropical environmental science was prompted by<br />

a succession of international research programs, which started with the<br />

International biological program (Golley, 1993). Our expertise in this<br />

question lays in the management of the Nouragues ecological research<br />

station, a scientific research station managed by the CNRS since 1986<br />

and located in the tropical rain <strong>for</strong>est of French Guiana, within the<br />

Nouragues natural reserve. At the Nouragues station, research programs<br />

have been <strong>de</strong>ployed to monitor relevant biological and physical<br />

measures to un<strong>de</strong>rstand the ecological dynamics of this important and<br />

endangered ecosystem.<br />

The structural heterogeneity of tropical <strong>for</strong>est ecosystems explain the<br />

difficulties of implementing quantitative research programs in the tropics.<br />

Because of rapid advance in environmental sensors and sampling<br />

technologies, it appears important to review progress in environmental<br />

monitoring and sensing applied to tropical <strong>for</strong>ests. Environmental sensors<br />

have a long history and they have been intensively researched <strong>for</strong><br />

a wi<strong>de</strong> range of applications. Although the focus of this contribution<br />

is on tropical <strong>for</strong>est <strong>ecology</strong> applications of sensors, it seems relevant<br />

to emphasise the major classes of sensors as used in research programs<br />

recently. <strong>Sensors</strong> fall into three main categories (see table 1): physical<br />

environmental sensors, chemical sensors, and biological sensors.<br />

Physical sensors measure micrometeorological variables, including light<br />

intensity, wind speed, and air moisture. Chemical sensors were mostly<br />

<strong>de</strong>veloped <strong>for</strong> monitoring carbon dioxi<strong>de</strong> concentration. However, more<br />

recent applications have expan<strong>de</strong>d its range to nitrous oxi<strong>de</strong>s and to


Part IV – Chapter 2 281<br />

volatile organic compounds. Biological sensors measure a wi<strong>de</strong> array of<br />

biological phenomena (see below).<br />

Table 1. Examples of major sensor modalities with comments<br />

on cost, reliability, and power requirements.<br />

Adapted from Run<strong>de</strong>l et al., 2009.<br />

Sensor<br />

category<br />

Physical<br />

Chemical<br />

Biological<br />

Temperature<br />

Example<br />

Relative humidity<br />

Leaf wetness<br />

Soil moisture<br />

Wind speed and direction<br />

(sonic anemometer)<br />

Atmospheric carbon dioxi<strong>de</strong><br />

Soil carbon dioxi<strong>de</strong><br />

Soil carbon dioxi<strong>de</strong> efflux<br />

Nitrate<br />

Phosphorus<br />

Digital imagers<br />

Minirhizotron cameras<br />

Sap flow sensors<br />

Acoustic sensors<br />

Comments<br />

Inexpensive to intermediate cost,<br />

reliable, low power requirements<br />

Intermediate, reliable, low power<br />

Inexpensive, reliable, low power<br />

Inexpensive to mo<strong>de</strong>rate, issues<br />

with calibration and measurement<br />

units, low power<br />

Intermediate, very reliable,<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>rate power<br />

Expensive, reliable, mo<strong>de</strong>rate<br />

power, requires careful calibration<br />

Intermediate, reliable, low power<br />

Expensive, reliable, mo<strong>de</strong>rate<br />

power, requires careful calibration<br />

Expensive, un<strong>de</strong>r <strong>de</strong>velopment <strong>for</strong><br />

reliable terrestrial <strong>de</strong>ployments<br />

Not available <strong>for</strong> terrestrial<br />

<strong>de</strong>ployments<br />

Mo<strong>de</strong>rately expensive, reliable,<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>rate power<br />

Expensive, variable power<br />

requirements<br />

Commercial probes: mo<strong>de</strong>rately<br />

expensive, calibration issues<br />

Mo<strong>de</strong>rate, reliable, mo<strong>de</strong>rate power<br />

There are several constraints to the implementation of environmental sensors<br />

in the tropics. First, the conditions are not always favourable to a<br />

sensor because of very high moisture levels, temperature exceeding 28°C<br />

most of the day, and the occurrence of frequent thun<strong>de</strong>rstorms – climatic<br />

conditions that may have an adverse effect on electronic components.<br />

Second, electricity and internet connection are not always ensured. At the


282 Integrated studies<br />

Nouragues station, a dual solution of a hydroelectric power plant and solar<br />

panels was chosen, yet we have experienced several episo<strong>de</strong>s of electric<br />

power failure over the past few years. Finally, the maintenance of most<br />

instruments is expensive and difficult because on-site support is lacking <strong>for</strong><br />

many of the sensors. In the <strong>for</strong>thcoming sections, possible options <strong>for</strong> environmental<br />

sensor <strong>de</strong>ployment in the tropical rain <strong>for</strong>est of the Nouragues<br />

station are reviewed.<br />

2. Environmental sensors<br />

2.1. Meteorology<br />

Many projects in <strong>ecology</strong> make direct use of environmental variables.<br />

These encompass climate, major elements in the environment (especially<br />

carbon and nitrogen), the soil, water and air chemistry, and light radiation.<br />

Environmental sensors need to be <strong>de</strong>ployed when these values are<br />

expected to vary at a sufficiently high frequency so as to impact ecological<br />

processes. While the measurement of climatic variables sounds like<br />

a trivial task, specific challenges occur in tropical <strong>for</strong>est environments.<br />

In<strong>de</strong>ed, norms specify that a rainfall gauge should not be placed closer<br />

than 10 times the height of the closest obstacle. In tropical <strong>for</strong>ests, trees<br />

are obvious obstacles, and they commonly grow 40m high or even higher.<br />

Hence, a clear cut of almost 1km² area should be ma<strong>de</strong> to ensure that<br />

the specifications are met. For this reason, it is virtually impossible to<br />

set up rainfall gauges at ground level in closed <strong>for</strong>est environments. One<br />

solution would be to set up the meteorological station atop a tower taller<br />

than the canopy, a difficult challenge in itself. Light measurement (either<br />

photosynthetically active radiation or total intensity), and the other main<br />

meteorological measures (air moisture, air temperature) suffers from the<br />

same limitation.<br />

A direct consequence of this limitation is that climate variables now routinely<br />

used in ecological mo<strong>de</strong>lling are poorly interpolated in many tropical<br />

areas. For instance, the large Worldclim database inclu<strong>de</strong>s only some<br />

10 reference points <strong>for</strong> the whole 83000km² of French Guiana (http://<br />

www.worldclim.org/; Hijmans et al., 2005). The university of East Anglia<br />

CRU Global climate dataset inclu<strong>de</strong>s mean climate variables <strong>for</strong> the<br />

period between 1960 and 1990, and is <strong>de</strong>rived from a global dataset of climatic<br />

normals, numbering 19,295 stations <strong>for</strong> precipitation and 12,092 <strong>for</strong><br />

temperature, and interpolated onto a 0.5° latitu<strong>de</strong> by 0.5° longitu<strong>de</strong> grid<br />

(New et al. 2002). This dataset inclu<strong>de</strong>d less than 30 points of temperature<br />

measurement over Amazonia, and a significantly sparser sampling of rainfall<br />

over the same area. The absence of fine-grained meteorological data


Part IV – Chapter 2 283<br />

limits our capability to draw conclusions about climate change effects in<br />

tropical rain<strong>for</strong>ests. For example, Fonty et al. (2009) reported changes in<br />

floristic composition at the top of the Nouragues inselberg, central French<br />

Guiana, and a staggering 2°C increase of the annual temperature mean in<br />

the village of Régina, around 40 km North East of Nouragues, from the<br />

the Meteo France data set of 1955-2005. These authors conclu<strong>de</strong>d that<br />

climate change was a potential trigger <strong>for</strong> the floristic changes observed<br />

at Nouragues. However, temperatures recor<strong>de</strong>d by the meteorological station<br />

in Regina may have been biased upward by land-use change and<br />

population increase around the municipality of Régina. Temperature<br />

measurements at the Nouragues station failed to <strong>de</strong>tect any significant<br />

trend over the period 1999-2009 (figure 1).<br />

Figure 1: Daily temperature from 1999 to 2009 at the inselberg site, Nouragues<br />

experimental Station. In blue: minimal temperature; in red: maximal temperature;<br />

in black: mean temperature (estimated as the arithmetic mean of minimal and<br />

maximal daily temperatures). Measurements <strong>for</strong> the period 1999-2002 were taken<br />

by an automated meteorological station. Measurements reported <strong>for</strong> the period<br />

2003-2009 were recor<strong>de</strong>d by permanent staff of the station (gaps correspond to<br />

periods of inactivity at the station).


284 Integrated studies<br />

2.2 Eddy flux covariance<br />

Over the past two <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s, an extension of micrometeorological stations<br />

has met with a great success in relation with questions in ecosystem science.<br />

This method, called eddy-flux correlation, makes use of micrometeorological<br />

sensors (including anemometers) coupled with CO 2<br />

concentration<br />

sensors (<strong>for</strong> a <strong>de</strong>tailed theoretical account, see Baldocchi 2003). The i<strong>de</strong>a<br />

is to measure CO 2<br />

concentration below and above any vegetated surface<br />

and eventually to measure the carbon balance of a range of vegetation<br />

types, thus bridging the gap between ecophysiological theories – applied<br />

at the leaf level – and whole ecosystem processes. The gradient in CO 2<br />

concentration is directly related to the net flux of CO 2<br />

between the turbulent<br />

air layer and the insi<strong>de</strong> of the vegetation. More precisely, the vertical<br />

CO 2<br />

flux is proportional to the covariance between fluctuations in the<br />

vertical component of air velocity, w, and the CO 2<br />

mixing ratio c (c = ρc/<br />

ρa where ρc is CO 2<br />

<strong>de</strong>nsity and ρa is air <strong>de</strong>nsity). For a tropical rain <strong>for</strong>est,<br />

it is there<strong>for</strong>e necessary to set up CO 2<br />

sensors below and above the<br />

canopy, and this can only be achieved by the construction of a tower<br />

climbing well above the canopy.<br />

Early attempts to implement this strategy were carried out in Brazil, near<br />

Manaus, by a British group led by Prof John Grace (Grace et al., 1995).<br />

Some technical problems ma<strong>de</strong> the long-term operation of such an instrument<br />

quite difficult (see Carswell et al., 2002). One of them is that the<br />

above-canopy air layer is not turbulent at night, violating one of the main<br />

assumptions of the eddy flux covariance method at night, when the <strong>for</strong>est<br />

is expected to release CO 2<br />

through respiration. The day-night change<br />

in the above-canopy turbulent air profile is far more pronounced in the<br />

tropics than in the temperate zone, making this problem even more acute<br />

than in temperate <strong>for</strong>ests. This bias would result in an un<strong>de</strong>restimation of<br />

the CO 2<br />

out flux at night time, resulting in an overestimation of the CO 2<br />

storage capacity of tropical <strong>for</strong>ests. Statistical methods have been <strong>de</strong>vised<br />

to <strong>de</strong>al with such anomalies, but it is to be expected that they are more<br />

serious when the terrain is hilly than when it is flat, a serious concern in<br />

many cases. In<strong>de</strong>ed, the horizontal flux of CO 2<br />

(CO 2<br />

leakage effect) may<br />

confound the vertical CO 2<br />

balance if the above-canopy air layer is not<br />

turbulent at night. Despite these problems, the technology has met with<br />

a great success over the past <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> and eddy-flux covariance towers are<br />

now part of a worldwi<strong>de</strong> network of sites called Fluxnet to measure global<br />

patterns of exchanges of CO 2<br />

between terrestrial ecosystems and the<br />

atmosphere (Baldocchi et al., 2001).<br />

Because of the logistical <strong>de</strong>mands of such an instrumentation and associated<br />

manpower, an eddy-flux tower has not been established at Nouragues,<br />

but one is operating near the coast, at the Paracou research station, oper-


Part IV – Chapter 2 285<br />

ated by the Institut National <strong>de</strong> la Recherche Scientifique (INRA, Bonal<br />

et al., 2008). Less than 10 eddy-flux covariance towers are now operating<br />

in Amazonia (almost all of them in Brazil), and their number is far less<br />

per unit area than in temperate areas, due to establishment cost and challenging<br />

logistics. Currently, only three sites have sufficient in<strong>for</strong>mation to<br />

fully resolve the carbon balance of an Amazonian rain <strong>for</strong>est.<br />

2.3 Distributed sensor networks<br />

The strategy of measuring meteorological variables by means of a single<br />

station is akin to assuming that fine scale spatial variation in micrometeorology<br />

may be ignored. However, the tropical <strong>for</strong>est environment is<br />

highly heterogeneous and <strong>for</strong> some applications it is critically important<br />

to <strong>de</strong>scribe and monitor this fine-grained variability. Montgomery and<br />

Chazdon (2002), <strong>for</strong> instance, measured with great <strong>de</strong>tails the amount<br />

of light that is available <strong>for</strong> the seedlings of sha<strong>de</strong> tolerant tree species<br />

in the un<strong>de</strong>rstory of a tropical <strong>for</strong>est of Costa Rica. They showed<br />

that light availability was essential to seedling survival and growth,<br />

but that only <strong>de</strong>tailed monitoring of long-term light availability could<br />

<strong>de</strong>termine the status of the plant. The light environment of a <strong>for</strong>est<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rstory is however extremely difficult to measure. One often uses<br />

the technique of hemispherical photographs of the canopy taken from<br />

the ground. These photographs are then analysed so as to threshold<br />

obstacles and measure the overall amount of sky (usually a few percent,<br />

Nor<strong>de</strong>n et al., 2007). This requires consi<strong>de</strong>rable manpower, as these photographs<br />

should be taken at dawn or dusk, so as to avoid the problem of<br />

saturating the image with direct sunlight. Photosynthesis theory tells us<br />

that other variables – among which temperature, soil hygrometry, and<br />

soil chemistry – should be also important in <strong>de</strong>termining the status of<br />

a seedling.<br />

One solution to this problem is to <strong>de</strong>vise networks of environmental<br />

sensors. When sensing a rough environment, it is important to have<br />

many in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt points of measurement. The challenges associated to<br />

this goal are that the no<strong>de</strong>s need to have a good autonomy (low energy<br />

<strong>de</strong>mand and/or solar power availability). They also should preferably be<br />

versatile and allow wireless communication. A cheap technical implementation<br />

of this i<strong>de</strong>a consists in placing small sensors at many points on<br />

the ground level and conducting periodic data collection campaigns. Allin-one<br />

probes are easy to set up and retrieval may be achieved through<br />

a simple USB port. One example is the EL-USB-2 (Lascar Electronics,<br />

Salisbury, UK), a sensor module that sells at about 50€ apiece. Another<br />

promising instrument is the iButton, a rugged and small sensor that easily<br />

withstands the moist and warm conditions of the tropical rain <strong>for</strong>est


286 Integrated studies<br />

environment (produced and sold by Maxim Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA,<br />

figure 2). The iButton may measure basic environmental variables, but<br />

a much larger range of such sensors is available in the market. In<strong>de</strong>ed,<br />

this market is driven by the need <strong>for</strong> continuous monitoring of the storage<br />

conditions <strong>for</strong> food products. Such a technology has a long history,<br />

although its application to a wi<strong>de</strong> array of problems (crop health status,<br />

medical tracking of patients in hospitals, <strong>de</strong>tection of hazards in remote<br />

areas) is recent.<br />

A more advanced version of a distributed sensor network would be to<br />

have the probes exchange in<strong>for</strong>mation between themselves and with a<br />

central monitoring unit. It would then be possible to extend the network<br />

to some arbitrarily large spatial scales and have the measured data<br />

propagate from one sensor to the next up until it reaches the ‘master’<br />

unit. Although the technique <strong>de</strong>scribed seems appealing, because it can<br />

be ma<strong>de</strong> redundant and may be <strong>de</strong>signed to spread over large sampling<br />

areas, no convincing examples are available as of now in the literature.<br />

One company, Crossbow (now purchased by Memsic Andover MA,<br />

USA), has <strong>de</strong>veloped easily <strong>de</strong>ployable sensor networks, the most recent<br />

version being the eko Pro series system (figure 2). Thus far, it has mostly<br />

been used <strong>for</strong> precision agriculture and crop monitoring (especially<br />

wine in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia). one great advantage of the eko Pro series no<strong>de</strong>s is<br />

their versatility: the no<strong>de</strong> can be fitted with four sensors that measure<br />

soil moisture and temperature, soil water content, ambient temperature<br />

and humidity, leaf wetness and solar radiation. A test of this instrument<br />

is un<strong>de</strong>rway in the tropical rain <strong>for</strong>est environment of the Nouragues<br />

experimental research Station.<br />

An extension of the above concept of environmental sensor networks<br />

may be using a relatively low number of sensors but retaining the capacity<br />

to sample large areas by moving sensors insi<strong>de</strong> the study site. One<br />

implementation of this i<strong>de</strong>a is cable-based robotic systems in long term<br />

and rapidly <strong>de</strong>ployable configurations, called networked info-mechanical<br />

systems (Run<strong>de</strong>l et al., 2009). This solution has the advantage of covering<br />

a large area with just one sensor, but it requires a lot of engineering and<br />

wiring, which may make its implementation clumsy in the un<strong>de</strong>rstory<br />

of a tropical rain <strong>for</strong>est. A related i<strong>de</strong>a has been implemented in sensorbearing<br />

robots. However, given the complex environment of tropical rain<br />

<strong>for</strong>ests, it is unlikely that robots will be a useful solution in a <strong>for</strong>eseeable<br />

future.


Part IV – Chapter 2 287<br />

Figure 2: A. The iButton rugged environmental sensor with data transfer <strong>de</strong>vice.<br />

b. The eko Pro series no<strong>de</strong> (yellow box) installed at the blue oak Ranch Reserve,<br />

University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. No<strong>de</strong>s read data from the local weather station and<br />

wirelessly transmit the data to the base radio. The data sent from all no<strong>de</strong>s is<br />

received at the base radio and is <strong>for</strong>war<strong>de</strong>d to the gateway. The gateway then stores<br />

data from the sensor network and makes it accessible via a web GUI interface. © B.<br />

Decencière, © M. Hamilton.


288 Integrated studies<br />

3. Biological monitoring<br />

3.1 Monitoring plant physiology<br />

Plants have also been a prime target <strong>for</strong> monitoring physiological status.<br />

Photosynthetic exchange capacity is now measured through very precise<br />

instrumentation, which gives access to the short-term response of the leaf<br />

to changes in the light and CO 2<br />

microenvironment (LiCOR 6400 photosynthesis<br />

analyser, Lincoln, USA). It is possible to monitor continuously<br />

the leaf assimilation rate of a plant using such instrument. Of course,<br />

such leaf-level measurements are critical to interpret correctly the outputs<br />

of eddy-flux covariance sensors (see section 2.2 above). At a coarser grain<br />

of resolution, it is also useful to get a simple normalised measurement<br />

<strong>for</strong> photosynthetic capacity that may be repeated <strong>for</strong> a large number of<br />

plants or across many plants, so as to assess the acclimation to environmental<br />

conditions. Portable instruments such as the Spad-meter measure<br />

the activity of the photosystem, thus the concentration in chlorophyll<br />

(Coste et al., 2010), in just a few seconds. A related portable instrument,<br />

the Dualex 4, commercialised by the French company Force-A (http://<br />

www.<strong>for</strong>ce-a.eu/) jointly measures chlorophyll content and polyphenol<br />

concentration (especially flavonoids).<br />

It is also possible to measure how fast sap flows from the roots to the leaves<br />

in a woody plant by using the difference of temperature between two thermocouples.<br />

This clever i<strong>de</strong>a was first implemented by André Granier from<br />

INRA Nancy (Granier, 1985), and is now commonly referred to as a Granier<br />

sapflow probe. This method uses two sensors, each containing a thermocouple<br />

inserted perpendicularly into the sapwood. The downstream sensor<br />

is heated and the measured difference in temperature between the sensors<br />

narrows as sap flux <strong>de</strong>nsity increases. Granier (1985) established empirically<br />

the relationship between temperature difference and sap flux <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />

by testing the system in <strong>de</strong>tached stem segments through which water was<br />

allowed to flow at known rates. The Granier probes are now commonplace<br />

in tropical ecosystem science (see O’Brien et al., 2004), and are routinely<br />

coupled with the study of sites equipped with eddy-flux towers. They are<br />

especially useful in tracking the water status of large trees. In<strong>de</strong>ed, plants<br />

un<strong>de</strong>r water stress close their stomata and thus lead to a reduction in sap<br />

flow, resulting in an increase of the plant’s water use efficiency.<br />

A third emerging application in monitoring the biological activity of plants<br />

from the ground is related to the emission of chemical volatile organic compounds<br />

(VOCs). Plants emit VOCs when they are stressed either by peculiar<br />

environmental conditions or by predation. Their flowers also often emit<br />

VOCs to signal their presence to cohorts of pollinators, which may highly be<br />

specialised. The diversity of VOCs is wi<strong>de</strong> and represents a fascinating way


Part IV – Chapter 2 289<br />

by which plants may exchange in<strong>for</strong>mation with their ecological partners<br />

(Raguso, 2008). However, a few molecules contribute to a disproportionate<br />

amount to the chemistry of the atmosphere and <strong>for</strong> this reason are being<br />

studied far more intensively. It is the case of isoprene, a terpene molecule<br />

with five carbon atoms whose half-life in the atmosphere is over 1 hour. It<br />

has been estimated that isoprene alone contributes to almost half of VOC<br />

emissions by vegetation (in mass) at a global scale (Guenther et al., 1995).<br />

Classical methods to monitor VOCs have not ma<strong>de</strong> use of sensors, but<br />

rely on the i<strong>de</strong>a of trapping (in fact adsorbing) VOCs in a physical matrix,<br />

and <strong>de</strong>sorbing the VOCs at high temperature to funnel them into a gas<br />

spectrometer coupled with a molecular analyser. This somewhat cumbersome<br />

procedure does not easily un<strong>de</strong>rgo automation. However, some recent<br />

progress was ma<strong>de</strong>. First, fast isoprene sensors have been <strong>de</strong>veloped based<br />

on the principle of chemiluminescence (Guenther and Hills, 1998) and are<br />

now used <strong>for</strong> monitoring in tropical environments. The second category<br />

of VOC sensors <strong>de</strong>tects and quantifies the presence of all monoterpenes<br />

(carbon based volatiles with 10 carbon atoms). A frontier in this research<br />

on VOC sensors is to retrieve the full in<strong>for</strong>mation about VOC emitted<br />

by the vegetation in real time and in the field. Recent advances inclu<strong>de</strong><br />

the automation of VOC trapping techniques including one method called<br />

relaxed eddy accumulation (REA). Instruments such as those are now being<br />

tested in tropical <strong>for</strong>est environments and one has been mounted atop the<br />

eddy-flux tower in Paracou, French Guiana. Up to now, these methods still<br />

require a downstream <strong>de</strong>sorption of the trapped molecules into a gas chromatographer,<br />

but technological advances may soon make it possible to analyse<br />

the VOCs in real time and without resorting to adsorption.<br />

3.2 Monitoring animal movement and physiological status<br />

Un<strong>de</strong>rstanding the home range and displacement of elusive tropical rain<br />

<strong>for</strong>est animals is one of the most exciting questions in tropical <strong>ecology</strong>. For<br />

this reason, a tremendous amount of research has been <strong>de</strong>voted to <strong>de</strong>velop<br />

technological and statistical techniques to estimate the <strong>de</strong>nsity and biology<br />

of these animals. At the Nouragues experimental research Station, these<br />

animals inclu<strong>de</strong> large mammals such as tapirs, peccaries, <strong>de</strong>er, monkeys<br />

and large birds such as black curassows or gray-winged trumpeters. One<br />

classic method is to survey transects at a slow speed (less than 1km/h)<br />

and observe animals. The distance to the animal, together with the angle,<br />

may be used to estimate population <strong>de</strong>nsity. Of course, other techniques<br />

may be <strong>de</strong>vised. One of them consists in randomly establishing camera<br />

traps in the survey area. Each time an animal crosses the line of a laser<br />

(or other <strong>de</strong>tection techniques), a photograph of the animal is taken. In some<br />

cases, it is possible to i<strong>de</strong>ntify the photographed individual. A long-term


290 Integrated studies<br />

monitoring program <strong>for</strong> large vertebrates based on this technology has<br />

been <strong>de</strong>veloped at the Nouragues station by Cecile Richard-Hansen and<br />

her colleagues from the Office national <strong>de</strong> la chasse et <strong>de</strong> la faune sauvage<br />

(see figure 3). This research group was able to successfully i<strong>de</strong>ntify tapirs<br />

and jaguars multiple times in the study area.<br />

Figure 3: A. C. Richard-Hansen setting up a camera trap. b. Photograph of a tapir<br />

moving in font of a camera trap. C. Camer traps to record animal presence and<br />

movements in the Nouragues experimental station. The camera traps were installed<br />

along walking paths (red lines). © C. Richard-Hansen.


Part IV – Chapter 2 291<br />

In a similar way, vi<strong>de</strong>o surveillance equipment was adapted to record the<br />

behaviour of animals living in the canopy. The equipment used at the<br />

Nouragues station consists of a small waterproof camera connected to a<br />

portable vi<strong>de</strong>o recor<strong>de</strong>r, settled to motion <strong>de</strong>tection, and fitted in a waterproof<br />

case. The electric power is supplied by lihium-ion batteries because<br />

of their lightness with regard to lead-ion batteries at comparable capacity.<br />

This equipment has been successfully used to study the nesting behaviour<br />

of the Red-throated Caracara, Ibycter americanus, one of the rare raptors<br />

living socially in small groups of less than ten individuals. The scientific<br />

knowledge concerning this relatively common species was so poor that<br />

even its nest was unrecor<strong>de</strong>d. It was found out that the dominant female<br />

of the group lays and incubates a unique egg. In addition, all individuals<br />

of the group feed the chick mainly with wasp nests, large millipe<strong>de</strong>s and<br />

fruits (McCann et al. 2010). The next step will be using this vi<strong>de</strong>o equipment<br />

in or<strong>de</strong>r to find out how this bird can avoid the stings when it is<br />

attacking wasp nests.<br />

The equipment was also tested to study the breeding behaviour of nocturnal<br />

and arboreal frogs Trachycephalus resinifictrix which are breeding in<br />

the water holes of canopy trees (Gaucher, unpublished results). A bucket<br />

simulating a water hole used by the male singers in trees was settled 5m<br />

high and equipped with this vi<strong>de</strong>o materiel. A continuous recording <strong>for</strong> a<br />

week shows that the bucket can attract up to four males together which are<br />

fighting to exclu<strong>de</strong> each other. Also, two different species of small snakes<br />

(one diurnal, one nocturnal) were <strong>de</strong>tected, and these fed upon tadpoles.<br />

Finally, one individual of Dendrobates tinctorius <strong>de</strong>posited its tadpole in<br />

the water bucket where it was also feeding on the eggs and tadpoles of<br />

T. resinifictrix.<br />

In non-tropical environments, the preferred method <strong>for</strong> monitoring individuals<br />

of large vertebrate species consists in capturing them and equipping<br />

them with a collar so that the animals can be located by radio-tracking<br />

or satellite tracking (see I, 2). This i<strong>de</strong>a is faced with several problems in<br />

the tropical <strong>for</strong>est environment, among which those caused by missing<br />

data from tracking <strong>de</strong>vices. First, it is quite hard to capture a wild animal,<br />

being rare and skilled at <strong>de</strong>tecting humans. Second, not all sensors can be<br />

used to geo-locate the animal because of the <strong>de</strong>nse <strong>for</strong>est un<strong>de</strong>rstory. One<br />

solution has been implemented by the group of Martin Wikelski, then at<br />

Princeton University. They installed a number of large towers on Barro<br />

Colorado Island, Panama, to follow the movement of a range of animals.<br />

The i<strong>de</strong>a is to set up transmitters on an animal, and to monitor its movement<br />

by triangulation between the antenna-receptor systems. The transmitters<br />

used by this team are less than 1cm long (http://www.princeton.<br />

edu/~wikelski/research/transmitters.htm) and the signal is propagated<br />

through FreeWave radios that ensure proper propagation from the sensors


292 Integrated studies<br />

to the lab (figure 4). Other examples of animal geolocation in tropical<br />

rain <strong>for</strong>ests inclu<strong>de</strong> birds (such as toucan, again in Panama), and bats.<br />

Because of their wi<strong>de</strong> ecological spectrum, their fascinating biology, and<br />

their high diversity in the tropics, bats have especially attracted a lot of<br />

research. Transmitter-equipped bats were followed to <strong>de</strong>tect their nesting<br />

sites, their <strong>for</strong>aging strategy and their metabolic phases (<strong>for</strong> an overview<br />

of the bats of French Guiana, see Charles-Dominique et al., 2001). Similar<br />

techniques could be applied to track the displacement of even tiny objects<br />

such as plants’ seeds (see Wright et al., 2008).<br />

Figure 4: Example of the movement of one radio-tracked agouti (in green), and<br />

of one ocelot (in yellow) in the ca. 15 km2 barro Colorado Island, Panama. The<br />

trajectory of both animals distinctively shows that the agouti was killed and eaten<br />

by the ocelot (red area). Vertical black bar on the background represent the location<br />

of the triangulation antennae. © R. Kays.<br />

Several applications of environmental sensors in animal <strong>ecology</strong> involve<br />

the continuous monitoring of the physiological status of a study animal,<br />

such as heart beat, transpiration, or movement speed (see I, 1). For example,<br />

it is now possible to continuously monitor the blood chemistry in<br />

diving emperor penguins (blood gases, O 2<br />

content, hemoglobin concen-


Part IV – Chapter 2 293<br />

tration, lactate concentration, Ponganis et al., 2007). To our knowledge,<br />

these involved applications <strong>for</strong> monitoring animal biological status still<br />

have to be implemented in tropical terrestrial animals, as these species<br />

need to move in complex environments and cannot be equipped with<br />

heavy instrumentation.<br />

3.3 Monitoring biodiversity<br />

A major frontier in biodiversity research is that long-term species monitoring<br />

was restricted. Long-term data usually are limited to a small number<br />

of emblematic species, often birds or terrestrial mammals, and these data<br />

are almost totally lacking in the tropics. Long term monitoring in the<br />

tropics has focused on frogs (especially in Central America, a hotspot <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>de</strong>ndrobatid frogs), birds (inspired by initiatives that began in temperate<br />

areas such as the breeding bird survey), and trees. Yet, these monitoring<br />

programs require tremendous amounts of manpower and are extremely<br />

expensive. For instance, the census of a large permanent tree sampling<br />

plot with some 10,000 trees mapped, tagged, and measured requires at<br />

least 2 weeks of work <strong>for</strong> an experienced team of approximately 10 technicians.<br />

In French Guina, the most recent census of the 22ha of permanent<br />

plots at Nouragues was conducted in November 2008, and more regular<br />

ones are now being carried out in the Paracou station and at other places<br />

through the Guya<strong>for</strong> project, a joint ef<strong>for</strong>t of Cirad-ONF and CNRS.<br />

Recently, a two-year long research project was conducted at the Nouragues<br />

station to assess the feasibility of a sampling method of abundance and<br />

diversity of common birds based on the French protocol of the “<strong>Suivi</strong><br />

temporel <strong>de</strong>s oiseaux oommuns” (Stoc program). The Stoc program has<br />

been <strong>de</strong>veloped in mainland France during the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> (Julliard et al.,<br />

2004), but had never been implemented in a tropical environment. Mist<br />

nets were set up in the un<strong>de</strong>rstory and monitored since October 2008 and<br />

until April 2010. A total of 453 birds were caught, 367 were ringed (all species<br />

except hummingbirds), and 86 marked animals were recaptured, <strong>for</strong> a<br />

total of 65 bird species. The first results of the Stoc, with a recapture rate<br />

about 20%, are very encouraging. However, this valuable survey had to be<br />

discontinued because of limited manpower at the station.<br />

Would it be possible to <strong>de</strong>vise autonomous instruments to monitor species<br />

diversity at one site in a tropical rain <strong>for</strong>est environment? The challenge is<br />

to screen at a fast pace signals that could be unambiguously assigned to a<br />

species or a taxon. Several options have recently opened up. One of them<br />

is based on the impressive advances offered by high-throughput DNA<br />

sequencing. Sequencing technologies are currently evolving at a fast pace<br />

and should offer unique opportunities to make a significant progress <strong>for</strong><br />

biodiversity surveys in the near future. One i<strong>de</strong>a <strong>de</strong>veloped recently in


294 Integrated studies<br />

the ANR (Agence nationale <strong>de</strong> la recherche) project Metabar led by Pierre<br />

Taberlet from the University of Grenoble and implemented partly in the<br />

tropical environment of Les Nouragues is to combine concepts from<br />

metagenomics (analysis of cellular microbial DNA from the soil) and from<br />

the recently emerged field of DNA barcoding (use of small DNA fragments<br />

that serve to discriminate among species). Virtually any soil contains<br />

enough extracellular DNA from <strong>de</strong>composed tissues (even <strong>de</strong>gra<strong>de</strong>d<br />

and in small quantities) to be extracted, amplified, and sequenced using<br />

next generation sequencers. An analysis of sequence repositories shows<br />

that, <strong>for</strong> most taxonomic groups, it is possible to find small DNA regions<br />

(i<strong>de</strong>ally around 30bp) that will efficiently discriminate across the taxa<br />

(Jørgensen et al., 2011). Using this approach, it should be possible to survey<br />

the diversity of taxa that make a substantial portion of the biomass<br />

in the soil environment, such as termites, earthworms, plants or fungi.<br />

Based on this strategy, a routine protocol could be established to evaluate<br />

the long-term trends, but also inter-annual variations in biodiversity, <strong>for</strong> a<br />

broad range of taxa. Such a DNA-based biodiversity sensor would require<br />

the <strong>de</strong>velopment of semi-automated procedures to extract and preserve<br />

environmental DNA be<strong>for</strong>e the laboratory analysis phase. It would also<br />

need a substantial and long-term financial investment to secure the funds<br />

<strong>for</strong> regular high-throughput sequencing runs.<br />

Another application relies on the sound produced by active animals<br />

such as amphibians, fish, birds, mammals, insects and other arthropods,<br />

all of which use sound <strong>for</strong> communication, navigation or predation.<br />

Bioacoustics is the discipline concerned with the <strong>de</strong>velopment of sensors<br />

specialised in <strong>de</strong>tecting animal sounds (see I, 4) and analysing them <strong>for</strong><br />

their ecological relevance, or as an indication of species occurrence and<br />

as a tool <strong>for</strong> biodiversity studies. Applications of these techniques are routinely<br />

ma<strong>de</strong> in tropical <strong>for</strong>est environments <strong>for</strong> birds (some ornithologists<br />

are able to i<strong>de</strong>ntify virtually all the species based on their song alone),<br />

but also <strong>for</strong> anurans. Automated methods <strong>for</strong> recording were <strong>de</strong>veloped<br />

and implemented in tropical <strong>for</strong>est environments (see II, 1; Acevedo and<br />

Villanueva-Rivera, 2006; see also Pijanowski et al., 2011 <strong>for</strong> a review). One<br />

company is now selling a fully packed solution <strong>for</strong> frog monitoring, called<br />

the froglogger (http://www.frogloggers.com/). We should also emphasise<br />

here that the method may be exten<strong>de</strong>d to the study of ultrasounds emitted<br />

by bats, an important component of the mammal community in neotropical<br />

rain <strong>for</strong>ests. However, more than twenty years after a hallmark publication<br />

of Fenton and Bell (1981), the acoustic i<strong>de</strong>ntification of neotropical<br />

bats is still at the stage of the research. The main problem is to build a reference<br />

library of ultrasound that would characterise the bat species, while<br />

taking in account intraspecific variability, which constitutes a consi<strong>de</strong>rable<br />

challenge. Studies by Michel Barataud and the Groupe chiroptères <strong>de</strong>


Part IV – Chapter 2 295<br />

Guyane have contributed to the <strong>de</strong>velopment of a large data base of sound<br />

sequences in natural conditions of flight. The data collection method uses<br />

<strong>de</strong>tectors of ultrasounds heterodyne–time expansion Pettersson D1000X,<br />

D980 and D 240X (Pettersson Elektronik AB TM ), and digital recor<strong>de</strong>rs on<br />

card (Edirol TM ) or minidisc (Sharp TM ).<br />

4. Remote sensing of the environment<br />

Remote sensing has played a key role in ef<strong>for</strong>ts to un<strong>de</strong>rstand ecological,<br />

hydrological and land-use processes in the tropics. The main advantage<br />

with remote sensing is that observations are ma<strong>de</strong> at a spatial scale and<br />

temporal resolution that captures the regional-level effects, and yet, can<br />

offer an outstanding level of <strong>de</strong>tail. The disadvantage is that the measurements<br />

are sometimes difficult to validate at a scale that matches the<br />

patterns expressed in the satellite observations. Also, it is often difficult<br />

to establish the causal mechanisms contributing to the remotely sensed<br />

patterns.<br />

4.1 Measuring rainfall from space<br />

One approach to bypass the lack on ground-based meteorological measurements<br />

makes use of remote sensing instrumentation embarked in the<br />

tropical rainfall monitoring mission (TRMM, Kummerow et al., 2000),<br />

with a wall-to-wall coverage, but a relatively coarse spatial resolution.<br />

Gaining a better knowledge on the climatic environment of the tropical<br />

<strong>for</strong>est biome still represents an important challenge because many of<br />

the climatic processes observed in the tropical belt have no equivalent in<br />

temperate zones, and are thus un<strong>de</strong>rstudied, in spite of their critical relevance<br />

to human welfare. This notably inclu<strong>de</strong>s quantitative data on the<br />

El Nino southern oscillation phenomenon, which causes serious droughts<br />

and associated fires quite regularly in South East Asia and America.<br />

Consequences <strong>for</strong> the flora and the fauna of tropical rain <strong>for</strong>ests are also<br />

important, as the lack of rain may result in a limited fruit <strong>de</strong>velopment in<br />

many keystone species, and thus lead the animal that feed upon it to starvation,<br />

as was first documented by Robin Foster (see Wright et al., 1999<br />

<strong>for</strong> a more quantitative and updated <strong>de</strong>scription). The TRMM produces<br />

a best-estimate precipitation rate within grids of 0.25° by 0.25° in a global<br />

band extending from 50 <strong>de</strong>grees South to 50 <strong>de</strong>grees North latitu<strong>de</strong>. The<br />

satellite has onboard a 2.3cm wavelength radar, called precipitation radar,<br />

that provi<strong>de</strong>s a global image of rainfall accumulation every three hours in<br />

pixels of about 1° in latitu<strong>de</strong> and longitu<strong>de</strong>. These values may be cumulated<br />

at a daily or monthly basis (see figure 5 <strong>for</strong> a long-term average).


296 Integrated studies<br />

Figure 5: Average rainfall in millimeters per day over the period 1998-2011 across<br />

the tropics. High rainfall zones are evi<strong>de</strong>nt in the Choco area in Colombia, in<br />

Papua New Guinea, and western borneo. A mean rainfall of 8mm/day (or about<br />

3,000mm/yr) is observed over most of Amazonia. © Tropical Rainfall Monitoring<br />

Mission’s website (http://trmm.gsfc.nasa.gov/).<br />

4.2 Measuring <strong>for</strong>est status from space<br />

Remote sensing of the biosphere has a long history which may be traced<br />

back to the very birth of the history of photography itself. In<strong>de</strong>ed the<br />

photographer Gaspard-Félix Tournachon (also known as Nadar) photographed<br />

the Petit bicêtre (nowadays Petit Clamart) from a captive balloon<br />

as early as 1858. However, the technology was largely <strong>de</strong>veloped <strong>for</strong> military<br />

purposes during the great wars, and resulted in a range of applications<br />

in the visible range, that culminated with Landsat and Spot instruments<br />

in the 70s. Both instruments passively record a few bands in the visible<br />

range (plus one in the infrared) and this signal may be related to the<br />

activity of the vegetation because of the absorbance spectrum of photosynthesis.<br />

One measurement of the vegetation activity is the normalised<br />

difference vegetation in<strong>de</strong>x (NDVI), which was successfully used to map<br />

the world-wi<strong>de</strong> extent of terrestrial biomes over the 1980s and well into<br />

the 1990s (see III, 4). Mapping ecosystems is of crucial importance, especially<br />

to un<strong>de</strong>rstand potential routes of dispersal, suitability of habitats,<br />

and other ecological features. One outstanding contribution to geographers<br />

and ecologists alike is due to the group led by Valéry Gond from<br />

Montpellier, who recently provi<strong>de</strong>d a <strong>de</strong>tailed map of the Guiana Shield<br />

based on optical remotely sensed instruments (figure 6, adapted from<br />

Gond et al., 2011). Not only does this map clearly shows the great heterogeneity<br />

of the Guiana Shield, which expands from Southern Colombia<br />

to French Guiana, and inclu<strong>de</strong>s a significant part of the Amazon and<br />

Orinoco watersheds, but it also evi<strong>de</strong>nces the presence of dry areas along<br />

the so-called Roraima corridor, which connects the Venezuelan llanos to<br />

the Serra dos Carajás in brazil, through the Rupununi of Guyana and the<br />

Sipaliwini savanna, South of Surinam.


Part IV – Chapter 2 297<br />

Low <strong>de</strong>nse <strong>for</strong>est / inclu<strong>de</strong>d savanna<br />

on poor drainage soils (RSLC 18)<br />

Tree / savanna<br />

(RSLC 25 and RSLC 26)<br />

High <strong>for</strong>est with regular canopy<br />

mostly on terra firme (RSLC 19)<br />

High <strong>for</strong>est with disrupted canopy<br />

(RSLC 20)<br />

Agriculture settlement / city<br />

(RSLC 32)<br />

Mixed high and open <strong>for</strong>est<br />

(RSLC 21)<br />

Open <strong>for</strong>est / euterpe palm <strong>for</strong>est<br />

(RSLC 22)<br />

Permanent / temporary waterbody<br />

(from RSLC 2 to RSLC 13 and RSLC 27,<br />

RSLC 29, RSLC 31 and RSLC 33)<br />

Figure 6: Map of landscape types of the Guiana Shield based on a classification<br />

of 1-km 2 remotely sensed pixels recor<strong>de</strong>d by the VEGETATIoN sensor onboard<br />

the Spot-4 satellite covering a period of 12 months. In the legend, RSLC stands <strong>for</strong><br />

remotely sensed landscape classes. The maroon and green color scale represents the<br />

five dominant <strong>for</strong>est landscape types. © V. Gond (see Gond et al., 2011 <strong>for</strong> a full<br />

review).<br />

Another important application of remote sensing is monitoring the status<br />

of vegetation as a response to changing climates. This is a difficult task<br />

however, as the controversy initiated by the publication by Scott Saleska<br />

and colleagues (Saleska et al., 2007) emphasises. These authors used<br />

NASA’s Terra satellite to argue that the canopy of the Amazon rain <strong>for</strong>est<br />

greened up during the 2005 drought, which affected much of the Amazon<br />

watershed. They inferred that the rain <strong>for</strong>est could be resilient to dryness,<br />

at least <strong>for</strong> short periods, and un<strong>de</strong>rmined in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt evi<strong>de</strong>nce that


298 Integrated studies<br />

Amazonian trees may have suffered directly from this drought (Phillips<br />

et al., 2009). However, Saleska et al’s discovery has been criticised because<br />

their methodology and data were inappropriate, and led to flawed conclusions<br />

(Samanta et al., 2010). In<strong>de</strong>ed, interpretation of satellite imagery<br />

in the visible spectrum may be contaminated by atmospheric aerosol,<br />

water vapour and sub-pixel cloud hazes.<br />

Because most remote sensors are able to <strong>de</strong>tect the roughness of a surface<br />

or its optical spectrum, what happens below the canopy of a <strong>for</strong>est is seldom<br />

visible. This causes serious problems <strong>for</strong> applications involving GPS<br />

units (though these have significantly improved over the past years), and<br />

also <strong>for</strong> measuring <strong>for</strong>est structure. A technique to scan below the canopy<br />

is the light <strong>de</strong>tection and ranging application (Lidar), which measures the<br />

distance from a source to a point based on the return time of a laser pulse,<br />

at a high frequency. Aircraft-borne instruments have been used to measure<br />

the topography of terrain below the canopy, because a fraction of the<br />

pulses reach the ground level. In 2007, canopy height has been measured<br />

over 600ha at the Nouragues station through a simple difference of canopy<br />

altitu<strong>de</strong> and ground altitu<strong>de</strong> as measured by a helicopter-borne Lidar<br />

instrument. Using these data, one can monitor the large-scale <strong>for</strong>est structure,<br />

locate treefall gaps and even the dynamics of treefall gap <strong>for</strong>mation,<br />

and better un<strong>de</strong>rstand the landscape-scale variation of ecosystem features.<br />

One of the grails of tropical <strong>for</strong>est science is to be able to measure biomass<br />

stocks in tropical <strong>for</strong>ests, because tropical <strong>for</strong>ests represent an important<br />

carbon stock and these stocks are in the process of being incorporated<br />

in financial markets through schemes such as reducing emissions from<br />

<strong>de</strong><strong>for</strong>estation and <strong>for</strong>est <strong>de</strong>gradation. Some proposals were ma<strong>de</strong> to<br />

relate canopy height to biomass stocks, and they show some promise<br />

at the landscape scale (Asner et al., 2010). However, other techniques<br />

were proposed as alternatives, including a radar sensor operating at the<br />

P band that may equip a future satellite currently in discussion at the<br />

European space agency, and called BIOMASS (http://www.esa.int/esaLP/<br />

SEMFCJ9RR1F_in<strong>de</strong>x_0.html). Some preliminary tests of this instrument<br />

were per<strong>for</strong>med in 2009 in French Guiana, through collaboration<br />

between Onera, ESA and the local French research teams. Flights over the<br />

Paracou station and over the Nouragues station yiel<strong>de</strong>d fascinating results,<br />

some of which are still being processed.<br />

4.3 Measuring biodiversity from space<br />

One of the dreams of remote sensing science is to <strong>de</strong>tect more subtle patterns<br />

than geographical or physical ones. This may be more than sciencefiction<br />

today but the use of hyperspectral sensors may help to achieve<br />

this goal. Hyperspectral sensors retrieve the reflection of a surface, not


Part IV – Chapter 2 299<br />

with a few wavelengths like in classical remote sensing imagery, but with<br />

hundreds of wavelengths. In section 3.2, we mentioned that the absorption<br />

pattern of light in the UV spectrum and in red could be jointly used<br />

to assess the concentration of chlorophyll and of flavonoids, one important<br />

class of secondary compounds in plant tissue. In fact, the continuous<br />

absorption spectrum of vegetation may yield bands that are typical to<br />

other compounds, and there<strong>for</strong>e be able to <strong>de</strong>tect part of the chemical<br />

composition of the canopy from a remote sensor. A research program on<br />

this issue has been implemented by Asner’s group at the Carnegie institution<br />

<strong>for</strong> science (Asner and Martin, 2011). by focusing a beam to single<br />

canopy, their technology is now able to retrieve part of the chemical composition,<br />

but also biophysical parameters, and possibly provi<strong>de</strong> a fast in<strong>de</strong>x<br />

of functional diversity in tropical <strong>for</strong>est environments (Asner et al., 2011).<br />

5. Conclusion<br />

Many of the techniques briefly presented here are by no means unique to<br />

tropical <strong>for</strong>est environments, but they share some features. These environmental<br />

sensors are comparatively simpler and more rugged than in many<br />

temperate applications. One critical factor is obviously the moisture of<br />

the tropical environment that has a <strong>de</strong>leterious effect on the electronics<br />

of many components of the sensor. Another constraint is the topic of<br />

research. While much of mo<strong>de</strong>rn <strong>ecology</strong> in the temperate zone <strong>de</strong>als with<br />

ecosystem science (with a strong focus on the measurement of fluxes),<br />

and experimental approaches (hypothesis testing on mo<strong>de</strong>l species), the<br />

breadth of research topics in the tropics inclu<strong>de</strong>s also an important but<br />

exceedingly difficult part: the documentation of basic patterns of diversity.<br />

Thus programs aimed at <strong>de</strong>veloping environmental sensors in the<br />

tropics should acknowledge this fact and strive to provi<strong>de</strong> tools adapted<br />

to documenting the environment in which species live (i.e. their niche).<br />

Many of these sensors are aimed at measuring physiological or chemical<br />

processes <strong>for</strong> specific species. While the <strong>de</strong>velopment of such sensors<br />

would seem like a natural outgrowth of fundamental research programs,<br />

it appears that the link between basic science and sensor <strong>de</strong>velopment<br />

remains loose in <strong>ecology</strong> and evolutionary biology (with a few noticeable<br />

exceptions). Finally, we have emphasised several possibilities towards the<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment of biodiversity sensors, i.e. semi-automated instruments that<br />

would provi<strong>de</strong> partial in<strong>for</strong>mation on the status of biodiversity, but that<br />

could be maintained <strong>for</strong> long time scales, so that early-warning signals to<br />

radical changes on biodiversity could be <strong>de</strong>tected early on.


300 Integrated studies<br />

Authors’ references<br />

Jérôme Chave:<br />

Université Paul Sabatier, Laboratoire Évolution et diversité biologique,<br />

UPS-CNRS-ENFA UMR 5174, Toulouse, France<br />

Philippe Gaucher:<br />

CNRS-Guyane, USR 3456, Cayenne, France<br />

Maël Dewynter:<br />

Office National <strong>de</strong>s Forêts, Réserve <strong>de</strong> Montabo, Cayenne, France<br />

Corresponding author: Jérôme Chave, jerome.chave@univ-tlse3.fr<br />

References<br />

Acevedo M. A., Villanueva-Rivera L. J., 2006. Using automated digital recording<br />

systems as effective tools <strong>for</strong> the monitoring of birds and amphibians.<br />

Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34, pp. 211-214.<br />

Asner G. P., Martin R. E., 2011. Canopy phylogenetic, chemical and spectral<br />

assembly in a lowland Amazon <strong>for</strong>est. New Phytologist, 189, pp. 999-1012.<br />

Asner G. P., Martin R. E., Tupayachi R., Emerson R., Martinez P., Sinca F.,<br />

Powell G. V. N, Wright J., Lugo A., 2011. Taxonomy and remote sensing of<br />

leaf mass per area (LMA) in humid tropical <strong>for</strong>ests. Ecological Applications,<br />

21, pp. 85-98.<br />

Baldocchi D. D., 2003. Assessing the eddy covariance technique <strong>for</strong> evaluating<br />

carbon dioxi<strong>de</strong> exchanges rates of ecosystem: past, present and future.<br />

Global Change Biology, 9, pp. 479-492.<br />

Bonal D., Bosc A., Ponton S., Goret J.-Y., Burban B., Gross P., Bonnefond J.M.,<br />

Elbers J., Longdoz B., Epron D., Guehl J.-M., Granier A., 2008. Impact of<br />

severe dry season on net ecosystem exchange in the Neotropical rain<strong>for</strong>est<br />

of French Guiana. Global Change Biology, 14, pp. 1917-1933.<br />

Carswell F. E., Costa A. L., Palheta M., Malhi Y., Meir P., Costa J. <strong>de</strong> P. R.,<br />

Ruivo M. <strong>de</strong> L., Leal L. do S. M., Costa J. M. N., Clement R. J., Grace<br />

J., 2002. Seasonality in CO 2<br />

and H 2<br />

O flux at an eastern Amazonian rain<br />

<strong>for</strong>est. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107, 43, pp. 1-16.<br />

Charles-Dominique P., Brosset A., and Jouard S., 2001. Les chauves-souris <strong>de</strong><br />

Guyane. Patrimoines Naturels, 49, pp. 1-150.<br />

Coste S., Baraloto C., Leroy C., Marcon E., Renaud A., Richardson A. D.,<br />

Roggy J.-C., Schimann H., Uddling J., Hérault B., 2010. Assessing foliar<br />

chlorophyll contents with the SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter: a calibration<br />

test with thirteen tree species of tropical rain<strong>for</strong>est in French Guiana.<br />

Annals of Forest Science, 67, pp. 607.


Part IV – Chapter 2 301<br />

Fenton M. B. and Bell G. P., 1981. Recognition of species of insectivorous bats<br />

by their their echolocation calls. Journal of Mammalogy, 62, pp. 233-243.<br />

Fonty E., Sarthou C., Larpin D., Ponge J.-F., 2009. A 10-year <strong>de</strong>crease in plant<br />

species richness on a neotropical inselberg: <strong>de</strong>trimental effects of global<br />

warming? Global Change Biology, 15, pp. 2360-2374.<br />

Ghazoul J., Sheil D., 2010. Tropical Rain Forest Ecology, Diversity, and<br />

Conservation. Ox<strong>for</strong>d University Press, New York, USA.<br />

Golley F. B., 1993. A History of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology, More than<br />

the sum of the parts. Yale University Press, New Haven, USA.<br />

Gond V., Freycon V., Molino J.-F., Brunaux O., Ingrassia F., Joubert P., Pekel<br />

J.-F., Prévost M.-F., Thierron V., Trombe P.-J., Sabatier D., 2011. Broadscale<br />

spatial pattern of <strong>for</strong>est landscape types in the Guiana Shield.<br />

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoin<strong>for</strong>mation,<br />

13, pp. 357–367.<br />

Grace J., Lloyd J., McIntyre J., Miranda A. C., Meir P., Miranda H. S., Nobre<br />

C., Moncrieff J., Masshe<strong>de</strong>r J., Malhi Y., Wright I., Gash J., 1995. Carbon<br />

dioxi<strong>de</strong> uptake by an undisturbed tropical rain <strong>for</strong>est in Southwest<br />

Amazonia, 1992 to 1993. Science, 270, pp. 778-780.<br />

Granier A., 1985. Une nouvelle métho<strong>de</strong> pour la mesure du flux <strong>de</strong> sève brute<br />

dans le tronc <strong>de</strong>s arbres. Annales <strong>de</strong>s Sciences Forestières, 42, pp. 193-200.<br />

Guenther A., Hewitt C. N., Erickson D., Fall R., Geron C., Grae<strong>de</strong>l T., Harley<br />

P., Klinger L., Lerdau M., Mckay W. A., Pierce T., Scholes B., Steinbrecher<br />

R., Tallamraju R., Taylor J., Zimmerman P., 1995. A global mo<strong>de</strong>l of natural<br />

volatile organic compound emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research,<br />

100, pp. 8873-8892.<br />

Guenther A. B., Hills A. J., 1998. Eddy covariance measurement of isoprene<br />

fluxes. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103, pp. 13145-13152.<br />

Hijmans R. J., Cameron S. E., Parra J. L., Jones P. G. Jarvis A., 2005. Very high<br />

resolution interpolated climate surfaces <strong>for</strong> global land areas. International<br />

Journal of Climatology, 25, pp. 965-1978.<br />

Jørgensen T., Kjaer K. H., Haile J., Rasmussen M., boessenkoel S., An<strong>de</strong>rsen K.,<br />

Coissac E., Taberlet P., brochmann C., orlando L., Gilbert M. P. T., Willerslev<br />

E., 2011. Islands in the ice: <strong>de</strong>tecting past vegetation on Greenlandic nunataks<br />

using historical records and sedimentary ancient DNA Meta-barcoding.<br />

Molecular Ecology, in press. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05278.x.<br />

Julliard R., Jiguet F., Couvet D., 2004. Evi<strong>de</strong>nce <strong>for</strong> the impact of global warming<br />

on the long-term population dynamics of common birds. Proceedings of<br />

the Royal Society of London B, 271, pp. 490-492.<br />

Kummerow C., Simpson J., Thiele O., Barnes W., Chang A. T. C., Stocker<br />

E., Adler R. F., Hou A., Kakar R., Wentz F., Ashcroft P., Kozu T., Hong<br />

Y., Okamoto K., Iguchi T., Kuroiwa H., Im E., Haddad Z., Huffman G.,<br />

Ferrier B., Olson W. S., Zipser E., Smith E. A., Wilheit T. T., North G.,<br />

Krishnamurti T., Nakamura K., 2000. The status of the tropical rainfall<br />

measuring mission (TRMM) after two years in orbit. Journal of Applied<br />

Meteorology, 39, pp. 1965-1982.


302 Integrated studies<br />

McCann S., Moeri O., Jones T., O’Donnell S. and Gries G., 2010. Nesting<br />

and nest provisioning of the Red-throated Caracara (Ibycter americanus) in<br />

central French Guiana. Journal of Raptor Research, 44, pp. 236-240.<br />

Montgomery R. A., Chazdon R. L., 2002. Light gradient partitioning by tropical<br />

tree seedlings in the absence of canopy gaps. Oecologia, 131, pp. 165-174.<br />

New M., Lister D., Hulme M., Makin I., 2002. A high-resolution data set of<br />

surface climate over global land areas. Climate Research, 21, pp. 1-25.<br />

Nor<strong>de</strong>n N., Chave J., Caubère A., Châtelet P., Ferroni N., Forget P.-M., Thébaud<br />

C., 2007. Is temporal variation of seedling communities <strong>de</strong>termined by<br />

environment or by seed arrival? Journal of Ecology, 95, pp. 507-516.<br />

O’Brien J. J., Oberbauer S. F., Clark D. B., 2004. Whole tree xylem sap flow<br />

responses to multiple environmental variables in a wet tropical <strong>for</strong>est.<br />

Plant, Cell and Environment, 27, pp. 551-567.<br />

Phillips O. L., Aragão L. E. O. C, Lewis S. L., Fisher J. B., Lloyd J., López-<br />

González G., Malhi Y., Monteagudo A., Peacock J., Quesada C. A., van<br />

<strong>de</strong>r Heij<strong>de</strong>n G., Almeida S., Amaral I., Arroyo L., Aymard G., Baker T. R.,<br />

Bánki O., Blanc L., Bonal D., Brando P., Chave J., Alves <strong>de</strong> Oliveira A. C.,<br />

Cardozo N. D., Czimczik C. I., Feldpausch T. R., Freitas M. A., Gloor E.,<br />

Niro Higuchi, Jiménez E., Lloyd G., Meir P., Mendoza C., Morel A., Neill<br />

D. A., Nepstad D., Patiño S., Peñuela M. C., Prieto A., Ramírez F., Schwarz<br />

M., Silva J., Silveira M., Thomas A. S., ter Steege H., Stropp. J., Vásquez<br />

R., Zelazowski P., Dávila E. A., An<strong>de</strong>lman S., Andra<strong>de</strong> A., Chao K.-J.,<br />

Erwin T., Di Fiore A., Honorio E. C., Keeling H., Killeen T. J., Laurance<br />

W. F., Peña Cruz A., Pitman N. C. A., Núñez Vargas P., Ramírez-Angulo<br />

H., Rudas A., Salamão R., Silva N., Terborgh J., Torres-Lezama A., 2009.<br />

Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rain<strong>for</strong>est. Science, 323, pp1344-1347.<br />

Pijanowski B. C., Villanueva-Rivera L. J., Dumyahn S., Farina A., Krause<br />

B., Napoleta B., Gage S. and Pieretti N., 2011. Soundscape <strong>ecology</strong>: the<br />

science of sound in landscape. BioScience, 61, pp. 203-216.<br />

Ponganis P. J., Stockard T. K., Meir J. U., Williams C. L., Ponganis K. V.,<br />

van Dam R. P., Howard R., 2007. Returning on empty: extreme blood<br />

O 2<br />

<strong>de</strong>pletion un<strong>de</strong>rlies dive capacity of emperor penguins. Journal of<br />

Experimental Biology, 210, pp. 4279-4285.<br />

Raguso R. A., 2008. Start making scents: the challenge of integrating chemistry<br />

into pollination <strong>ecology</strong>. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 128,<br />

pp. 196-207.<br />

Run<strong>de</strong>l P. W., Graham E. A., Allen M. F., Fisher J. C., Harmon T. C., 2009.<br />

Environmental sensor networks in ecological research. New Phytologist,<br />

182, pp. 589-607.<br />

Saleska S. R., Didan K., Huete A. R., Da Rocha H. R., 2007. Amazon <strong>for</strong>ests<br />

green-up during 2005 drought. Science, 378, pp. 612.<br />

Samanta A., Ganguly S., Hashimoto H., Devadiga S., Vermote E., Knyazikhin<br />

Y., Nemani R. R., Myneni R. B., 2010. Amazon <strong>for</strong>ests did not green-up<br />

during the 2005 drought. Geophysical Research Letters, 37.


Part IV – Chapter 2 303<br />

Wright S. J., Trakhtenbrot A., Bohrer G., Detto M., Katul G. G., Horvitz<br />

N., Muller-Landau H. C., Jones F. A., Nathan R., 2008. Un<strong>de</strong>rstanding<br />

strategies <strong>for</strong> seed dispersal by wind un<strong>de</strong>r contrasting atmospheric<br />

conditions. Proceedings of the National Aca<strong>de</strong>my of Sciences of the USA,<br />

105, pp. 19084-19089.<br />

Wright S. J., Carrasco C., Cal<strong>de</strong>rón O., Paton S., 1999. The El Niño southern<br />

oscillation, variable fruit production, and famine in a tropical <strong>for</strong>est.<br />

Ecology 80, pp. 1632-1647.


Chapter 3<br />

Use of sensors in marine mesocosm<br />

experiments to study the effect of<br />

environmental changes on planktonic<br />

food webs<br />

Behzad Mostajir, Jean Nouguier, Emilie Le Floc’h, Sébastien Mas, Romain Pete,<br />

David Parin, Francesca Vidussi<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Marine ecosystems, and their biological components in particular, play<br />

a crucial role in the regulation of Earth climate and in the biogeochemical<br />

cycles of major elements such as carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, or<br />

sulphur (Pielke, 2008). Moreover, marine ecosystems are reservoirs<br />

of biodiversity that remain partially undiscovered (Webb et al., 2010).<br />

In addition, these ecosystems, in particular coastal zones, provi<strong>de</strong> a<br />

large variety of ecological services to our society. In the context of a<br />

changing environment at global and local scales, studying the ecological<br />

and evolutionary responses of marine organisms, from cell to population<br />

level and from communities to food web level, becomes more than ever<br />

essential.<br />

The observation of marine ecosystem from permanent fixed observatory<br />

systems provi<strong>de</strong>s essential in<strong>for</strong>mation about ecosystem variability<br />

at local or regional scales. These observatory systems can be linked<br />

together and <strong>for</strong>m a web to gather data that can be interpreted at large<br />

spatial and temporal scales and coupled with remote-sensing data from<br />

satellites (see III, 3 and II, 2). However, it is necessary to complement<br />

these large-scale field studies with observations and experiments of isolated<br />

assemblages of marine micro-organisms. The isolation of a portion<br />

of water mass including associated plankton assemblages can be realised


306 Integrated studies<br />

into an enclosed experimental unit (e.g. a mesocosm) to study ecological<br />

processes from cells to communities and food webs. The confined<br />

organisms and associated water mass can also be subjected to different<br />

experimental treatments in or<strong>de</strong>r to study responses to known <strong>for</strong>cing<br />

factors.<br />

This mesocosm experimental approach, complementary to the observational<br />

approach, provi<strong>de</strong>s additional fundamental in<strong>for</strong>mation about<br />

the <strong>ecology</strong> of organisms and their interactions with biotic and abiotic<br />

factors. In<strong>for</strong>mation from field observation and from experimentation<br />

can be merged and used <strong>for</strong> predictive mo<strong>de</strong>lling. The main objective<br />

of this chapter is to illustrate and discuss the use of sensors to study<br />

physico-chemical and biological variables as well as sensors used to<br />

apply treatments in marine mesocosm experiments. These sensors can<br />

also be used as feedback controls of the applied treatments in marine<br />

mesocosm experiments. Some of these sensors are also used in marine<br />

observatories and have been presented elsewhere in the context of other<br />

methodological approaches (see II, 2 and III, 1). However, we focus<br />

here on constraints from using these sensors in mesocosm experimentation<br />

to study confined planktonic assemblages and obtain <strong>de</strong>tailed<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation on ecosystem functioning. It is necessary to stress out that<br />

some of the sensors and automated systems presented in this chapter<br />

were <strong>de</strong>veloped <strong>for</strong> specific objectives within the framework of our<br />

scientific projects.<br />

2. Experimental marine <strong>ecology</strong> using mesocosm approach<br />

A major concern in environmental marine science is to <strong>de</strong>termine and<br />

predict the response of pelagic ecosystems to factors such as increasing<br />

pCO 2<br />

and consequent <strong>de</strong>crease of water pH as well as increasing temperature<br />

and stratification, influencing both light and nutrient availabilities.<br />

At the same time, in applied aquatic science, the means to preserve or<br />

restore coastal and marine environments to ensure their sustainable ecological<br />

services attract an increasing attention. In addition, it is becoming<br />

more and more important to un<strong>de</strong>rstand how some marine resources can<br />

be newly produced and sustainably exploited, including microalgae used<br />

<strong>for</strong> biofuel production, <strong>for</strong> example.<br />

The water column of marine ecosystems is a natural habitat <strong>for</strong> many<br />

organisms that have adopted the planktonic life mo<strong>de</strong> <strong>for</strong> the main part<br />

of their life cycle (see II, 2). Although the planktonic organisms can<br />

move in the water column, these organisms cannot actively swim like<br />

fish and their movement is rather dictated by water mass advection.


Part IV – Chapter 3 307<br />

Plankton microbial organisms ensure the most fundamental functions<br />

in marine ecosystems such as primary production and remineralisation,<br />

and play a key role in the biogeochemical cycles of major elements on<br />

Earth (Falkowski et al., 2008; Falkowski, 1994; Falkowski and Woodhead,<br />

1992). Study of microbial planktonic processes such as nutrient assimilation,<br />

production, growth, and respiration, as well as investigation of their<br />

interaction with other plankton assemblages are most of the time carried<br />

out in the microcosms.<br />

Figure 1: Relationship between the size of a marine organism (adapted from<br />

Sieburth et al., 1978) and the water volume required <strong>for</strong> studying a community<br />

assemblage. The most important organisms in the marine ecosystem functioning<br />

are Femto-plankton (0.02-0.2µm, viruses and small heterotrophic Archea and<br />

bacteria), Pico-plankton (0.2-2µm, larger heterotrophic bacteria, cyanobacteria,<br />

small eukaryotic phototrophs, and heterotrophic flagellates), Nano-plankton<br />

(2-20µm, most of phytoplankton assemblages, large heterotrophic flagellates<br />

and small ciliates), Micro-plankton (20-200µm, large phytoplankton, large<br />

ciliates including thintini<strong>de</strong>s, and different stages of metazooplankton including<br />

copepods), Meso-plankton (0.2-20mm, large phytoplankton, protozooplankton<br />

and metazooplankton), Macro-plankton (2-20cm) and Mega-plankton<br />

(20-200cm).<br />

As an operational way to study planktonic assemblages, Sieburth et<br />

al. (1978) distinguished these assemblages according to their sizes (see


308 Integrated studies<br />

figure 1). To investigate physiology, life cycle and interaction between<br />

femto-, pico-, nano- and micro-plankton the experiments can be conducted<br />

in the laboratory using some litres of water containing all these<br />

assemblages (i.e. microcosm experiments). However, experimental systems<br />

of community responses to perturbations should inclu<strong>de</strong> most<br />

of the components of the food web to investigate both direct effects<br />

of the studied stressors on organisms and indirect effects through trophic<br />

responses, <strong>for</strong> example trophic casca<strong>de</strong>s (e.g., Vidussi et al., 2011).<br />

For this, an experimental water volume of at least thousand litres (i.e.<br />

mesocosm) that contain all or most of the biological components of<br />

the plankton food web (virus, bacteria, phyto and zoo-plankton, fish<br />

larvae) is necessary (figure 1). Mesocosms can also host benthic organisms<br />

interacting with the plankton (i.e. filters fee<strong>de</strong>rs) or small fish (i.e.<br />

plankton fee<strong>de</strong>rs).<br />

The utilisation of mesocosms has proved essential to provi<strong>de</strong> new results<br />

on the topics of global change effect on marine systems, such as the<br />

study of the effects of increasing ultraviolet B radiation (e.g. Mostajir<br />

et al., 1999), the increase of CO 2<br />

and acidification (e.g. Riebesell et<br />

al., 2007), the increase of water temperature (e.g. Lewandowska and<br />

Sommer, 2010), and simultaneous increases of water temperature and<br />

ultraviolet B radiation (Vidussi et al., 2011). New fundamental concepts<br />

have emerged from mesocosm experiments (i.e. concerning food web<br />

functioning, Thingstad et al., 2007), and mesocosm experiments are<br />

also an essential tool in eco-toxicology (e.g. Sargian et al., 2005; Pestana,<br />

2009). Until now, studies of marine ecosystems in the water column of<br />

the mesocosms have been generally per<strong>for</strong>med from discrete samplings<br />

at different time interval from hours to days or weeks. Yet, ecological<br />

processes at the microbial level can occur at short time scales in the<br />

or<strong>de</strong>r of hours, and the absence of a<strong>de</strong>quate high-frequency sampling<br />

can hi<strong>de</strong> some fundamental processes taking place between two discrete<br />

sampling episo<strong>de</strong>s. Thus, automated sensors in mesocosm experiments<br />

have been used recently to monitor physicochemical and biological variables<br />

and hence provi<strong>de</strong> fundamental in<strong>for</strong>mation at high frequency<br />

with little perturbation of mesocosms and a reduced human ef<strong>for</strong>t<br />

(Vidussi et al., 2011). Another fundamental advantage of using automated<br />

sensors is that they allow regulation and realistic simulation of<br />

some experimental treatments including climatic variables (Nouguier et<br />

al., 2007). We present in this chapter different sensors that can be used<br />

in mesocosm experiments. Most examples and related data presented<br />

here are from experiments carried out in the Mediterranean centre <strong>for</strong><br />

marine ecosystem experimental research operated jointly by the CNRS<br />

and the University of Montpellier 2 (Medimeer, http://www.medimeer.<br />

univ-montp2.fr/, see figure 2).


Part IV – Chapter 3 309<br />

Figure 2: In situ moored mesocosms (up to 12) around the Medimeer floating<br />

plat<strong>for</strong>m (ca. 30m) installed in Thau lagoon (Mediterranean coastal lagoon, South<br />

of France).<br />

3. <strong>Sensors</strong> to monitor ecological variables in marine mesocosms<br />

Several variables in the water column can be studied during the mesocosm<br />

experiments. These environmental variables inclu<strong>de</strong> the water column<br />

physical properties (e.g. temperature, salinity, and light radiation), the biogeochemical<br />

properties (e.g. dissolved nutrients, oxygen concentration,<br />

and particle load), and proxies of biological components (e.g. fluorescence<br />

of phytoplankton). These variables can be continuously monitored at a<br />

high resolution by a set of automated in situ sensors.<br />

3.1. Monitoring of the water column physico-chemical properties<br />

and variability<br />

3.1.1. Water temperature<br />

The monitoring of temperature along a vertical profile within a mesocosm<br />

gives in<strong>for</strong>mation on the <strong>de</strong>gree of stratification or homogenisation of the<br />

water column. Moreover, because biological processes are temperature<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt,<br />

monitoring of water temperature can contribute to un<strong>de</strong>rstand


310 Integrated studies<br />

responses of organisms to experimental treatments. Among the usual temperature<br />

sensors, such as thermocouple and platinum resistor (Pt100 and<br />

Pt1000), thermistors are well adapted to the measurement of natural water<br />

temperature. Their resistance varies inversely with temperature, but, more<br />

importantly, their baseline resistance value and coefficient of variation are<br />

generally large. This permits the use of long cables and allows an easy half<br />

bridge measurement on data loggers <strong>for</strong> the long term recording of numerous<br />

temperature channels. An improvement by a software correction is<br />

used to minimise linearisation errors and obtain measurements from 0 to<br />

40°C with an accuracy from 0.01 to 0.02°C. Figure 3A shows an example<br />

of water temperature monitored at three <strong>de</strong>pths during a mesocosm experiment.<br />

This shows firstly the daily variations of water temperature in the<br />

mesocosm, and also <strong>de</strong>monstrates the efficiency of water mass mixing done<br />

with a pump in the mesocosm. Diel variations of water column temperature<br />

tend to follow the variation of atmospheric temperature.<br />

3.1.2. Conductivity<br />

The conductivity of water is its ability to transmit the electric current.<br />

The electrically charged ions move in presence of an electrical field or an<br />

alternative magnetic field (see III, 1). To measure the water conductivity<br />

in aquatic environments, two techniques are available. The first one is<br />

the electro<strong>de</strong> cell method that is mostly used <strong>for</strong> measuring low conductivities<br />

in pristine environments. Here, the conductivity is obtained from<br />

measurement of the electric current generated by an alternative electric<br />

field between the electro<strong>de</strong>s of the cell. The second one relies on the electromagnetic<br />

induction method, which is used <strong>for</strong> high conductivity measurements<br />

in various types of marine environments. <strong>Sensors</strong> using this<br />

method are rather immune to biofouling, and the measured electric current<br />

flowing through the water is generated by the alternative electric field<br />

from a ring trans<strong>for</strong>mer. As the relative proportions of the main ionic constituents<br />

are nearly constant, the conductivity can be directly converted<br />

to salinity <strong>for</strong> a given temperature using available standards (Weyl, 1964).<br />

During the mesocosm experiments, conductivity measurements were conducted<br />

with AADI Aan<strong>de</strong>raa CS3119 AIW (Aan<strong>de</strong>raa Data Instrument<br />

AS, Norway) to monitor the temporal variations of salinity (figure 3B).<br />

The trend after one day of measurement shows a salinity increase in surface<br />

waters, indicating the occurrence of evaporation.<br />

3.1.3. Nutrients concentrations<br />

The nutrients commonly measured during experiments are nitrate, nitrite,<br />

ammonia, phosphate, silicate, dissolved organic nitrogen and phosphorus<br />

species. Nutrients are one of the essential elements <strong>for</strong> the growth of


Part IV – Chapter 3 311<br />

Figure 3: In situ sensors installed on the Medimeer plat<strong>for</strong>m. A. Monitoring of<br />

daily variations of water temperature measured every 2 minutes at three <strong>de</strong>pths<br />

during a mesocosm experiment. B. Monitoring of salinity in the surface water of a<br />

mesocosm measured every 2 minutes.<br />

phytoplankton and bacteria. The continuous nutrient concentration<br />

monitoring in real time by in situ nutrient analyser probes allows <strong>de</strong>termining<br />

sources, sinks, and dynamics of different nutrients in natural environments<br />

(Vuillemin et al., 2009) and can be adapted <strong>for</strong> the mesocosm<br />

experiment. This permits <strong>for</strong> example long-term study of water quality<br />

regarding pollutants, effluents and nutrient loads. In<strong>de</strong>ed, a continuous<br />

measurement of nutrient concentrations helps to i<strong>de</strong>ntify the effect of<br />

anthropogenic nutrient sources on planktonic communities including the<br />

triggering of blooms by the nutrient load of continental waters (Lefebvre,<br />

2006). Most in situ nutrients analyser-probes, such as SubChem Analyzer<br />

and Wiz probes, measure automatically various dissolved chemical species,<br />

using wet chemical techniques of in-flow analysis based on standard<br />

laboratory analytical methods (spectrophotometry and fluorimetry)<br />

<strong>de</strong>veloped as long as a century ago (Varney, 2000; Thouron et al., 2003).<br />

These analytical probes are equipped with one or multiple reagent-<strong>de</strong>livering<br />

modules and standards, and one or mutiple electro-optical <strong>de</strong>tectors<br />

– their number <strong>de</strong>pends on the measurement of one or several nutrients<br />

(nitrate, nitrite, phosphate, ammonia, see Blain et al., 2004; Lefebvre,<br />

2006). The frequency of measurement <strong>de</strong>pends on the amount of reagent<br />

and standard loa<strong>de</strong>d in the probe, and the number of nutrients measured<br />

by the probes. To avoid the drifts and the <strong>de</strong>gradation of optics, reagents,<br />

calibration standards, and also biofouling in the sensor sampling line, a<br />

frequent maintenance is necessary, which inclu<strong>de</strong>s reagents and standards<br />

change, complete clean up and in situ recalibration of the probe.


312 Integrated studies<br />

3.1.4. Turbulence<br />

In natural aquatic environments, turbulence is created by wind shear at<br />

the surface, horizontal shear at the pycnocline (i.e., <strong>de</strong>nsity gradient) and<br />

sediment surface, breaking surface and internal waves, and buoyancy<br />

effects such as convection. Turbulent mixing at a small scale can influence<br />

predator-prey interactions (Rothschild and Osborn, 1988; Browman,<br />

1996; Dower et al., 1997), particle capture (Shimeta and Jumars, 1991),<br />

aggregation and disaggregation (MacIntyre et al., 1995), small-scale<br />

patchiness (Moore et al., 1992; Squires and Yamazaki, 1995), and species-specific<br />

growth inhibition (Gibson and Thomas, 1995). However,<br />

turbulence is also important <strong>for</strong> mixing large water masses with distinct<br />

physical properties or nutrient flux in the same water column (Jørgensen<br />

and Revsbech, 1985; Da<strong>de</strong>, 1993; Denman and Gargett, 1995; Karp-Boss<br />

et al., 1996). There<strong>for</strong>e, in the aquatic ecosystems, turbulence is one of the<br />

significant environmental factors influencing the plankton <strong>ecology</strong>.<br />

In mesocosm experiments, turbulence regimes can be simulated to adjust<br />

fluxes of nutrients, dissolved gases and particle aggregations and disintegrations.<br />

There are various techniques ensuring turbulent mixing in the<br />

mesocosms such as rotating paddles and oscillating grids in tanks, flexiblewalled<br />

in situ enclosures (Menzel and Case, 1977; Grice and Reeve, 1982)<br />

and other mixing schemes including bubbling (Eppley et al., 1978; Sonntag<br />

and Parsons, 1979) and pumping (Kotak and Robinson, 1991). These techniques<br />

can provi<strong>de</strong> reasonable representation of some aspects of natural<br />

turbulent mixing but usually not all of them (San<strong>for</strong>d, 1997). In<strong>de</strong>ed, it is<br />

not expected that any single mixing <strong>de</strong>sign <strong>for</strong> a mesocosm experiment will<br />

reproduce all aspects of natural turbulence. Hence significant differences<br />

between natural turbulence and that generated in the water column of a<br />

mesocosm are frequent (Brumley and Jirka, 1987; Fernando, 1991).<br />

Turbulent mixing can be monitored during experiments by using several<br />

types of sensors including laser doppler velocimeters (Hill et al., 1992),<br />

small acoustic (Kraus et al., 1994; Trivett and Snow, 1995) and electromagnetic<br />

velocity sensors (Howarth et al., 1993), flow meters and particle<br />

image velocimetry. In particular, the particle image velocimetry system,<br />

<strong>de</strong>veloped <strong>for</strong> fluid dynamics studies (Gray and Bruce, 1995) and based<br />

on the assumption that the particles follow the flow, allows estimating<br />

accurately the velocity field and the small-scale distribution of flow and<br />

turbulence by tracking small particle movement through series of frame.<br />

Fluorometers are also wi<strong>de</strong>ly used to study processes of diffusion and<br />

mixing based on dye dispersion technique, since fluorescent dyes such<br />

as rhodamine and fluoresceine are <strong>de</strong>tectable at very low concentrations.<br />

This dye dispersion technique consists in injecting a small amount of a<br />

fluorescent neutrally buoyant dye either into the surface or mid-<strong>de</strong>pth,<br />

and measuring fluorescence at several locations in the mesocosms over


Part IV – Chapter 3 313<br />

time. The mixing time and velocity are <strong>de</strong>fined by tracer concentration<br />

reaching a specified <strong>de</strong>gree of uni<strong>for</strong>mity insi<strong>de</strong> the mesocosm.<br />

3.2. Monitoring the plankton food web components<br />

3.2.1. Chlorophyll and phycoerythrin concentrations<br />

Measurements of fluorescence have been used <strong>for</strong> many years in marine<br />

science to measure concentrations of chlorophyll (Lorenzen, 1966; Mignot<br />

et al., 2011). Phytoplankton species have specific pigments and the <strong>de</strong>tection<br />

of some of these pigments gives in<strong>for</strong>mation about their concentrations,<br />

as well as phytoplankton biomasses and diversity. The fluorescence<br />

level can be monitored by sensors and mo<strong>de</strong>rn compact ones have a wi<strong>de</strong><br />

range of optical configurations and a wi<strong>de</strong> range of wavebands to measure<br />

chlorophyll a (phycoerythrin and phycocyanin) and other pigments. This<br />

has paved the way <strong>for</strong> new <strong>de</strong>velopments such as use of multiples excitation<br />

wavelengths <strong>for</strong> discriminating between phytoplankton taxa (Paresys<br />

et al., 2005). In the mesocosm experiment, the continuous measurement<br />

of chlorophyll a and phycoerythrin concentrations by fluorescence sensors<br />

is used to monitor the presence and the temporal dynamic of the algal<br />

bloom (chlorophyll a measurement) or cyanobacteria (phycoerythrin<br />

measurement). It is also used to <strong>de</strong>termine the diel variations of pigment<br />

concentration (particularly chlorophyll a), which is affected by change of<br />

phytoplanktonic biomass and photoacclimation processes. Figure 4 shows<br />

an example of diel variations <strong>for</strong> chlorophyll a concentration monitored<br />

<strong>for</strong> the first time during a mesocosm experiment.<br />

Figure 4: Diel variations of chlorophyll a concentration monitored every 2 minutes<br />

by a Wetlabs sensor in a mesocosm experiment.


314 Integrated studies<br />

3.2.2. Particulate organic carbon of small particles<br />

In open ocean waters, particulate organic carbon (POC) is the main<br />

source of particles (see III, 3 and IV, 1). Particle load is the main driver<br />

of water turbidity in the open ocean, which can be quantified by the<br />

backscattering coefficient measurement with backscattering meter. The<br />

bulk backscattering coefficient (b bp<br />

) measurements are affected by particle<br />

size distribution and composition of seawater constituents (colloids,<br />

bacteria, phytoplankton, biogenic <strong>de</strong>tritus, minerogenic particles, and<br />

bubbles). Recent studies have shown that the POC concentration of<br />

small particles can be estimated with reasonable accuracy from particle<br />

backscattering coefficient at 470 or 510nm, provi<strong>de</strong>d mineral particles<br />

are absent (Stramski et al., 1999; Loisel et al., 2001; Balch et al., 2005).<br />

Some optical sensors measure the backscattering coefficient at different<br />

wavelengths and, through some calculations, give the spectral slope γ of<br />

the particulate backscattering coefficient. Based on theoretical and in situ<br />

studies (e.g. Reynolds et al., 2001; Stramska et al., 2003), the γ slope has<br />

been proposed as a proxy of the suspen<strong>de</strong>d marine particle size distribution<br />

<strong>for</strong> particles smaller than 10µm (Loisel et al., 2006). backscattering<br />

coefficient measurements at high frequency can be per<strong>for</strong>med during<br />

mesocosm experiments using commercial sensors such as the Wetlabs<br />

Eco-Triplet sensors, which operates at 470, 532, 650 and/or 880nm. These<br />

sensors were used to <strong>de</strong>termine the dynamic of organic particles smaller<br />

than 10µm during two mesocosm experiments in the Medimeer plat<strong>for</strong>m<br />

(data not shown).<br />

3.2.3. Plankton i<strong>de</strong>ntification, size and abundance<br />

Plankton is the main component of the pelagic food web and is an indicator<br />

of the ecological status of water masses (Manizza et al., 2005; Wyatt<br />

and Ribera d’Alcala, 2006). Plankton is also an indicator of water quality<br />

and is influenced by natural and anthropogenic changes in the environment<br />

(Belin and Berthome, 1991). Apart from the possibility to use in<br />

situ imagery system <strong>for</strong> observations and i<strong>de</strong>ntifications of marine zooplankton<br />

and particles (see II, 2), in situ flow cytometry is a powerful<br />

tool to investigate microorganisms such as phytoplankton in their natural<br />

environment (Dubelaar et al., 1999; Olson et al., 2003; Sosik et al.,<br />

2003; Dubelaar et al., 2004; Thyssen et al., 2008). One of the first in<br />

situ flow cytometer, the FlowCytobot was <strong>de</strong>signed to cover the full-size<br />

range of phytoplankton (from 1µm up to several 100µm) during several<br />

month <strong>de</strong>ployments (Olson et al., 2003; Sosik et al., 2003). The first generation<br />

of FlowCytobot was optimised <strong>for</strong> the analysis of pico- and small<br />

nanoplankton (around 1 to 10μm) and used fluorescence and light scattering<br />

signals from a laser beam (Olson et al., 2003; Sosik et al., 2003).


Part IV – Chapter 3 315<br />

To complement this <strong>de</strong>vice, a submersible imaging FlowCytobot (Olson<br />

and Sosik, 2007) has been <strong>de</strong>veloped to i<strong>de</strong>ntify the taxonomy of natural<br />

plankton assemblages (nano- and microplanktonic organisms and <strong>de</strong>tritus)<br />

in the size range from around 10 to 100μm. This new generation combines<br />

a vi<strong>de</strong>o and image in-flow system to cover the size range from 10 to<br />

100µm (Olson and Sosik, 2007; Sosik and Olson, 2007) and a flow cytometric<br />

technology to both capture images of organisms <strong>for</strong> i<strong>de</strong>ntification<br />

and measure chlorophyll fluorescence associated with each image. Like<br />

the laboratory-based FlowCam (Sieracki et al., 1998), the automatic classification<br />

procedures of the various plankton types uses an approach based<br />

on a combination of image feature types including size, shape, symmetry,<br />

and texture characteristics, as well as orientation invariant moments, diffraction<br />

pattern sampling, and co-occurrence matrix statistics (Sosik and<br />

Olson, 2007). Moreover, the measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence<br />

allow to discriminate phototrophic (i.e. phytoplankton) from heterotrophic<br />

cells.<br />

The fully automated CytoBuoy is another submersible flow cytometer<br />

that <strong>de</strong>livers data in real-time when operated online (Dubelaar et al.,<br />

1999; Cunningham et al., 2003; Dubelaar and Jonker, 2000). CytoBuoy<br />

allows estimating phytoplankton biomass and discriminating between<br />

different phytoplankton groups with an approach that combines the<br />

morphological, pulse-shape (large horizontal to vertical aspect ratio)<br />

and high-frequency analysis of particle crossing a laser beam. With<br />

additional ef<strong>for</strong>ts in sensor miniaturisation and in reduction of power<br />

consumptions, the continuous and long-term use of a submersible flow<br />

cytometer will be soon possible during mesocosm experiments.<br />

We have not used a submersible flow cytometer yet in the Medimeer’s<br />

mesocosms. This instrument is still too large and it is difficult to immerse<br />

it in the mesocosms where different treatments are applied without<br />

increasing disturbance or contamination. Also, the cost of the system is<br />

still prohibitive when one wants to replicate sensors across mesocosms.<br />

An alternative solution could be to use an automated pumping system to<br />

provi<strong>de</strong> the water sample from different mesocosms to a flow cytometer<br />

installed in the laboratory nearby the mesocosm plat<strong>for</strong>m. This would<br />

allow to per<strong>for</strong>m continuous plankton monitoring with minimal cost<br />

and disturbance.<br />

3.3. Assessment of the food web functioning<br />

In aquatic <strong>ecology</strong>, mesocosm experimentations are per<strong>for</strong>med in or<strong>de</strong>r<br />

to assess the functioning of the food web and the web energy transfer. To<br />

characterise the resilience of the ecosystem studied, the direct and indirect<br />

effects of biological and environmental interactions (trophic casca<strong>de</strong>s,


316 Integrated studies<br />

feedbacks) on the ecosystem functioning (e.g. CO 2<br />

exchanges, nitrogen<br />

or phosphorus cycles, aerosols production) should be assessed. Currently,<br />

only few sensors are <strong>de</strong>veloped and used to automatically monitor such<br />

parameters and these sensors focus on net O 2<br />

exchanges or bivalve filtration<br />

activity.<br />

3.3.1. Dissolved oxygen concentration and community oxygen<br />

metabolism<br />

Oxygen is involved in most of biological and chemical processes in aquatic<br />

systems. The net O 2<br />

production and respiration rates can be calculated by<br />

measuring the changes in the dissolved O 2<br />

concentrations in the course<br />

of the experiment during day-time and night-time respectively. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

the dissolved O 2<br />

can be used as a proxy of the net community oxygen production.<br />

Moreover, as photosynthesis and respiration stoichiometrically<br />

relate on oxygen and carbon fluxes, the net O 2<br />

production and respiration<br />

rates can be converted into net carbon production and respiration rates by<br />

using equations with photosynthetic and respiratory quotients of conversion<br />

(Dickson and Orchardo, 2001). The photosynthetic quotients are<br />

various, because they have been calculated on the basis of the biochemical<br />

composition of phytoplankton (Laws, 1991), direct measurements of<br />

natural communities (Williams and Robertson, 1991; DeGrandpre et al.,<br />

1997) and mo<strong>de</strong>lling studies (Williams, 1993).<br />

Two families of sensors are used to measure dissolved oxygen (see III, 1).<br />

The sensors based on galvanic or polarographic oxygen electro<strong>de</strong>s are generally<br />

used <strong>for</strong> short-term measurements because frequent changes of the<br />

membrane and calibration are necessary. Thus, most of the oxygen sensors<br />

used in marine mesocosm experiments are based on oxygen dynamic<br />

luminescence quenching of a platinum porphyries complex. These opto<strong>de</strong><br />

sensors are used <strong>for</strong> long term recording of dissolved O 2<br />

in marine and<br />

brackish waters because of their strength, their immunity to biofouling<br />

and their easiness of cleaning. Since salinity and water temperature influence<br />

the dissolved O 2<br />

concentration in marine system, O 2<br />

sensor is generally<br />

associated with a temperature sensor and a conductivity or salinity<br />

sensor via a data logger in or<strong>de</strong>r to realise the necessary correction in real<br />

time.<br />

In flow-through mesocosms, flow-respirometry technique is applied by<br />

measuring difference in concentration in the outflowing water compared<br />

to the inflowing water (Griffith et al., 1987). In open-top mesocosms,<br />

sea-air exchange has to be taken into account and the assumption<br />

that the respiration rate is constant in the light and in the dark has to<br />

be ma<strong>de</strong> (Leclerc et al., 1999). The common gross photosynthesis and<br />

respiration <strong>for</strong> a community can then be calculated based on ampero-


Part IV – Chapter 3 317<br />

polarographic electro<strong>de</strong> measurements over 24 hours and by using a<br />

multiple regression method. Figure 5 shows an example of dissolved<br />

O 2<br />

concentrations monitoring at high frequency during a mesocosm<br />

experiment per<strong>for</strong>med in Medimeer. The dissolved O 2<br />

concentration<br />

increase during light period indicates that phytoplanktonic O 2<br />

production<br />

excee<strong>de</strong>d plankton community respiration, whereas the O 2<br />

concentration<br />

<strong>de</strong>crease during dark period suggests an important community<br />

respiration activity.<br />

Figure 5: Monitoring of oxygen saturation every 2 minutes in the water column of<br />

a mesocosm. Oxygen saturation was measured with an opto<strong>de</strong> sensor.<br />

3.3.2. Bivalve activity in relation with plankton communities<br />

In coastal marine environments, filter fee<strong>de</strong>rs such as bivalves can control<br />

the planktonic communities by filtering their surrounding water including<br />

small living and non-living particles. To study the relationship between<br />

plankton dynamics and bivalve filtration, it is necessary to be sure that<br />

the bivalves are alive and physiologically active. The bivalve physiological<br />

activity can be assessed continuously by measuring the frequency of valve<br />

gape. For mussels, valve gape is measured by automated remote-sensing<br />

technologies such as fiber-optic imaging (Franck et al., 2007) or Hall<br />

effect sensor system (Robson et al., 2007). Robson et al. (2009) also used a<br />

Hall effect sensor system to measure the pumping flux from the exhalant<br />

siphon. A Hall effect sensor is a transducer that varies its output voltage<br />

in response to changes in a magnetic field. These changes are induced by<br />

changes in the distance between the sensor and a magnet positioned few<br />

millimetres away.


318 Integrated studies<br />

Figure 6: Monitoring of oyster valve gape every 2 seconds at the beginning (day 1,<br />

dash black line) and at the end (day 9, plain grey line) of a mesocosm experiment.<br />

The oyster Crassostrea gigas remains open most of the time at the beginning while its<br />

periods of activity are shortened at the end of the experiment (with fewer opening<br />

period).<br />

The Hall effect sensor was used in a gape activity measurement system<br />

during a mesocosm study carried out on Medimeer in or<strong>de</strong>r to measure<br />

oysters (Crassostrea gigas) filtration pressure (Mostajir et al., unpublished<br />

data). During this experiment, each oyster resting on its bottom shell was<br />

glued on a PVC plate where a hall sensor was inserted. The other part of<br />

the hall sensor system was a magnet attached on a PVC stick glued on the<br />

oyster top shell. In this way, changes in magnetic field were produced by<br />

variations in the distance between the sensor and this magnet. Twenty<br />

oysters were introduced to two mesocosms and sensors were connected to<br />

a data logger (CR23X, Campbell Scientific). The signal (output voltage)<br />

was sampled every 2 seconds. The physiological activity of the twenty<br />

oysters, related to the <strong>de</strong>gree of valve aperture at two levels (open and<br />

close), was monitored continuously over the nine days of the experiment<br />

(figure 6). The results highlighted that oyster behaviour of particle filtration,<br />

as indicated by duration of valve aperture, correlated with plankton<br />

abundances. At the beginning of the experiment (day 1), plankton was<br />

abundant and valves were opened all day long. When food became scarce<br />

at the end of the experiment (day 9) valves remained closed some hours<br />

per days (Mostajir et al., unpublished data).


Part IV – Chapter 3 319<br />

4. Automated sensors to regulate marine mesocosm experiments<br />

<strong>Sensors</strong> in aquatic mesocosm studies can also used <strong>for</strong> the automated<br />

feedback control of the experimental conditions. Automatic regulation is<br />

crucial <strong>for</strong> the long-term and continuous control of marine mesocosms,<br />

and to ensure a good repeatability between treatments. Automated sensors<br />

are wi<strong>de</strong>ly used in indoor mesocosm facilities. For example, automated<br />

sensors control the chemical doses of pollutants and stressors in<br />

the Experimental stream facility (U.S. Environmental protection agency,<br />

USA), the water level in the Multiscale experimental ecosystem research<br />

center facility (University of Maryland, USA), and the water motion insi<strong>de</strong><br />

a mesocosm (Falter et al., 2006).<br />

In outdoor mesocosms, especially those immersed in the sea, regulation<br />

of the experimental conditions is more problematic than in indoor mesocosms<br />

because of their higher temporal variability and because of stronger<br />

constraints on accessing an energy source. Still, the mixing turn-over time<br />

generated by a pump of which flow rate is controlled by voltage input<br />

can be automated using the feedback of a flow meter set in the outflow<br />

circuitry (Medimeer team, unpublished data). In addition, recent <strong>de</strong>velopments<br />

have focused on sensor-based regulation systems of different global<br />

changes scenarios. Up to now, the feedback control <strong>de</strong>vice focused on<br />

increase of carbon dioxi<strong>de</strong> (CO 2<br />

), temperature and ultraviolet B radiation<br />

(UVBR: 280-320nm). Regulation of these variables is important to<br />

elucidate the response of marine organisms as well as those of the whole<br />

food web to these stressors, as they are expected to change in the near<br />

feature from global anthropogenic changes. Mo<strong>de</strong>ls predict an increase<br />

of average atmospheric pCO 2<br />

which induces marine acidification (IPCC,<br />

2007). Water temperature is also expected to increase as a consequence of<br />

global warming, and inci<strong>de</strong>nt UVBR at the sea surface are expected to be<br />

modified as a concomitant effect of ozone <strong>de</strong>pletion and global warming<br />

(Weatherhead and An<strong>de</strong>rsen, 2006; IPCC, 2007).<br />

Kim et al. (2008) <strong>de</strong>signed an in situ mesocom facility <strong>for</strong> CO 2<br />

enhancement<br />

studies by adapting the set up used in previous experiments (Engel et<br />

al., 2005; Delille et al., 2005; Kim et al., 2006). The continuous feedback<br />

control only concerned the gas concentration in the headspace above the<br />

mesocosm measured with online infrared analysers (LI-COR 820). Other<br />

experimental setups focused only either on temperature (Liboriussen et al.,<br />

2005) or on UVBR (Roy et al., 2006). Here, we present a set-up of sensors<br />

used in the combined regulation of UVBR and water temperature increase<br />

in the outdoor immersed mesocosms of Medimeer. The experiment and<br />

technical set up are thoroughly <strong>de</strong>scribed in our previously published articles<br />

(Nouguier et al., 2007; Vidussi et al., 2011). The <strong>de</strong>veloped setup aimed<br />

to maintain a proportional enhancement between the control mesocosms


320 Integrated studies<br />

and the treatment mesocosms, where an increase of 3.1°C was applied<br />

<strong>for</strong> the temperature and an increase of 20% was applied <strong>for</strong> the UVBR.<br />

The main objective was to ensure that the enhanced treatments perfectly<br />

tracked natural temporal variations in temperatures and inci<strong>de</strong>nt UVBR<br />

in real-time. A data logger (CR23X, Campbell Scientific) monitored the<br />

reference measurements, the feedback control measurements, calculated the<br />

<strong>de</strong>viation between the measured values and the target values, and sent a<br />

proportional command to heating elements and UV lamps (figure 7).<br />

For the two temperature-increased mesocosms, the reference temperature<br />

was calculated from the mean of the temperature measured every 30 seconds<br />

at three <strong>de</strong>pths in the control mesocosms using thermistor probes<br />

(Campbell Scientific 107). Changes in the reference temperature comman<strong>de</strong>d<br />

the functioning of a submersible heating element insi<strong>de</strong> treatment<br />

mesoscosms (Galvatec, France). The feedback control temperature was calculated<br />

<strong>for</strong> warmed mesocosms from the mean temperature measured at 3<br />

<strong>de</strong>pths by using thermistors probes. As shown on figure 8A, the variations<br />

Figure 7: Scheme of the experimental <strong>de</strong>sign <strong>for</strong> increasing UVBR and water<br />

temperature in the mesocosm relative to water temperature and inci<strong>de</strong>nt UVBR<br />

measured in the control mesocosms (without heating and UVBR increase). For<br />

further in<strong>for</strong>mation see Nouguier et al. (2007).


Part IV – Chapter 3 321<br />

of the temperature in the warmed mesocosm matched the variations in the<br />

control mesocosms and a constant difference of 3.1°C was maintained.<br />

For the UVBR enhanced treatments, the reference inci<strong>de</strong>nt irradiance<br />

was measured every 30 seconds by an ultraviolet B sensor SKU 430 (Skye<br />

Instruments) situated outsi<strong>de</strong> and corrected with a set coefficient taking<br />

into account shading and transmission reduction at the centre of the<br />

mesocosms. Variations in inci<strong>de</strong>nt UVBR comman<strong>de</strong>d the regulation of<br />

ultraviolet b fluorescent lamps (Philips TL20RS/01) controlled by electronic<br />

ballasts (bAG electronics AD18.22310) and allowed to maintain<br />

a constant +20% increase of UVBR in UVBR enhanced treatments. The<br />

stability of the +20% constraint is achieved thanks to a ultraviolet B sensor<br />

SKU 430 (Skye Instruments) positioned indoor in a structure imitating<br />

the upper part of the treatment mesocosms. This latter structure<br />

and controlling sensor receive the same regulation command from the<br />

immersed mesocosms. It was placed in the workshop of Medimeer to<br />

accurately measure the radiation <strong>de</strong>livered by the ultraviolet B lamps as<br />

the sensor needs to be set on a stable plane surface. In addition, the correct<br />

functioning of the ultraviolet B lamps is checked in real-time <strong>for</strong> each<br />

lamp by a custom-built photodio<strong>de</strong> system (sglux TW30DZ). As shown<br />

on figure 8B, the variations of the UVBR in the illuminated mesocosm<br />

matched the variations in the control mesocosm and a constant enhancement<br />

of 20% was maintained during the day.<br />

Figure 8: Use of sensors to manipulate environmental conditions in a mesocosm<br />

experiment. A. In the mesocosm experiment carried out in April 2005, after the<br />

heating started (1), the temperature gradually increased over 2 hours until an<br />

enhancement of 3°C is reached. The temperature regulation (2) was then fully<br />

in operation maintaining a difference on 3.1°C on average and tracking perfectly<br />

the variations of the temperature in the control mesocosm. Water temperature of<br />

mesocosms was monitored every 30 seconds. B. Data from a mesocosm experiment<br />

carried out in April 2005 <strong>de</strong>monstrate that the UV regulation running from 9:45<br />

to 17:45 controlled the 20% enhancement <strong>de</strong>livered by UVB lamps: the artificial<br />

UVBR intensity (black line) followed the short-term variations in the natural<br />

inci<strong>de</strong>nt UVBR. UVBR was monitored every 30 seconds.


322 Integrated studies<br />

5. Towards a new generation of sensors<br />

In marine mesocosm experiments, several environmental parameters can<br />

be monitored with the use of automated sensors as <strong>de</strong>scribed in section 3.<br />

Some of these sensors are voluminous (sometimes 0.5m high) and difficult<br />

to <strong>de</strong>ploy in relatively small mesocosms (around 1m of diametre<br />

and 1m 3 water volume). There is there<strong>for</strong>e a need to reduce the size of<br />

the current sensors <strong>for</strong> future applications in mesocosm experiments. In<br />

addition, several measurement biases may arise from biofouling. This is<br />

the case in particular <strong>for</strong> fluorescence sensor, which will require frequent<br />

cleaning especially in eutrophic waters where biofilm <strong>de</strong>velopment can<br />

be very fast. In this case, a sensor with a wiper should be used such as<br />

the Wetlabs fluorescence sensors. Additional ef<strong>for</strong>ts in the equipment of<br />

copper wired filter avoiding the creation of biofouling may also be recommen<strong>de</strong>d.<br />

Finally, a reduction of the power and reagents consumption of<br />

some chemical sensors is necessary to enable their routine use in oceanic<br />

monitoring during long-term <strong>de</strong>ployments.<br />

As previously mentioned, data coming from the use of several sensors<br />

insi<strong>de</strong> mesocosms can be combined to investigate the global characteristics<br />

or responses of the food web components un<strong>de</strong>r a simulated perturbation.<br />

Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, there are still obvious lacks in the availability<br />

of sensors providing key in<strong>for</strong> mation about the diversity and dynamics<br />

of aquatic microorganisms. Some miniaturised geno-sensors <strong>de</strong>dicated to<br />

the i<strong>de</strong>ntification of microorganisms can distinguish species or groups of<br />

microorganisms, and would provi<strong>de</strong> very useful in<strong>for</strong>mation about the<br />

food web dynamics in the mesocom experiments (see II, 3 <strong>for</strong> toxic algae).<br />

Miniaturised camera sensors with associated software allowing image<br />

analysis would also be useful to study the interaction between microorganisms<br />

or between microorganisms and metazooplankton such as predation<br />

(see II, 2). More generally, the <strong>de</strong>velopment of the next generation<br />

of biological sensors and their use in mesocosm experiments would help<br />

to bring a huge step <strong>for</strong>ward regarding our knowledge in marine <strong>ecology</strong>.<br />

This is likely to be the case regarding urgent scientific questions about the<br />

consequences of anthropogenic changes on the local and global scales.<br />

Authors’ references<br />

Behzad Mostajir, Emilie Le Floc’h, Sébastien Mas, David Parin:<br />

Université <strong>de</strong> Montpellier 2, Centre d’écologie marine expérimentale<br />

Medimeer (Mediterranean centre <strong>for</strong> marine ecosystem experimental<br />

research), CNRS UMS 3301, Montpellier, France.


Part IV – Chapter 3 323<br />

Behzad Mostajir, Jean Nouguier, Romain Pete, Francesca Vidussi:<br />

Université <strong>de</strong> Montpellier 2, Écologie <strong>de</strong>s systèmes marins côtiers<br />

(Ecosym), CNRS, IRD, IFREMER, Université Montpellier 1 UMR 5119,<br />

Montpellier, France<br />

Corresponding author: Behzad Mostajir, bmostajir@univ-montp2.fr<br />

Aknowledgement<br />

MEDIMEER was fun<strong>de</strong>d by ECOSYM laboratory, CNRS INEE, Institut<br />

Fédératif <strong>de</strong> Recherche 129 Armand Sabatier, CNRS-GDR 2476, and<br />

Région Languedoc-Roussillon. We acknowledge support of the European<br />

project MESOAQUA, Grant agreement n° 22822, to provi<strong>de</strong> some of the<br />

sensors and some of the related mesocosm experiments from which some<br />

data are presented here. The UV-B and temperature increase mesocosm<br />

experiment (UVTEMP project) and the Oyster mesocosm experiment<br />

(Oyster and Fish project) were foun<strong>de</strong>d by the French National Program<br />

in Coastal Science (PNEC-Chantier Lagunes Mediterréennes). Special<br />

thanks to Eric Fouilland <strong>for</strong> the constructive comments in the first version<br />

of the manuscript.<br />

References<br />

Balch W. M., Gordon H. R., Bowler B. C., Drapeau D. T., Booth E. S., 2005.<br />

Calcium carbonate measurements in the surface global ocean based<br />

on mo<strong>de</strong>rate-resolution imaging spectro-radiometer data. Journal of<br />

Geophysical Research, 110, pp. 1-21.<br />

Belin C., Berthome J. P., 1991. REPHY: the French monitoring network of<br />

phytoplankton, in: Fremy J. M. (Ed), Proceedings of Symposium on<br />

Marine biotoxins. Centre national d’étu<strong>de</strong>s vétérinaires et alimentaires,<br />

Paris, pp. 189-194.<br />

Blain S., Guillou P., Tréguer P., Woerther P., Delauney L., Follenfant E., Gontier<br />

O., Hamon M., Leildé B., Masson A., Tartu C., Vuillemin R., 2004. High<br />

frequency monitoring of coastal marine environment using Marel buoy.<br />

Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 6, pp. 569-575.<br />

Browman H. I., 1996. Predator-prey interactions in the sea: commentaries on<br />

the role of turbulence. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 139, pp. 301-302.<br />

Brumley B. H., Jirka G. H. 1987. Near-surface turbulence in a grid-stirred tank.<br />

Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 183, pp. 235-263.<br />

Cunningham A., McKee D., Craig S., Tarran G., Widdicombe C., 2003. Finescale<br />

variability in phytoplankton community structure and inherent


324 Integrated studies<br />

optical properties measured from an autonomous un<strong>de</strong>rwater vehicle.<br />

Journal Marine System, 43, pp. 51-59.<br />

Da<strong>de</strong> W. B., 1993. Near-bed turbulence and hydrodynamic control of<br />

diffusional mass transfer at the sea floor. Limnology and Oceanography,<br />

38, pp. 52-69.<br />

DeGrandpre M. D., Hammar T. R., Wallace D. W. R., Wirick C. D., 1997.<br />

Simultaneous mooring-based measurements of seawater CO 2<br />

and O 2<br />

off Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. Limnology and Oceanography, 42,<br />

pp. 21-28.<br />

Delille B., Harlay J., Zon<strong>de</strong>rvan I., Jacquet S., Chou L., Wollast R., Bellerby<br />

R.G.J., Frankignoulle M., Viera Borges A., Riebesell U., Gattuso J.-P., 2005.<br />

Response of primary production and calcification to changes of pCO2<br />

during experimental blooms of the coccolithophorid Emiliania huxleyi.<br />

Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 19, pp. 1-14.<br />

Denman K. L., Gargett A. E., 1995. Biological-physical interactions in the upper<br />

ocean: the role of vertical and small scale transport processes. Annual<br />

Review of Fluid Mechanics, 27, pp. 225-256.<br />

Dickson M.-L., Orchardo J., 2001. Oxygen production and respiration in<br />

the Antarctic Polar Front region during the austral spring and summer.<br />

Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in oceanography, 48,<br />

pp. 4101-4126.<br />

Dower J. F., Miller T. J., Leggett W. C., 1997. The role of microscale turbulence<br />

in the feeding <strong>ecology</strong> of larval fish. Advances in Marine Biology, 31,<br />

pp. 169-220.<br />

Dubelaar G. B. J., Geer<strong>de</strong>rs P. J. F., Jonker R. R., 2004. High frequency<br />

monitoring reveals phytoplankton dynamics. Journal of Environmental<br />

Monitoring, 6, pp. 946-952.<br />

Dubelaar G. B. J., Gerritzen P., Beeker A. E. R., Jonker R. R., Tangen K., 1999.<br />

Design and first results of Cytobuoy: a wireless flow cytometer <strong>for</strong> in situ<br />

analysis of marine and fresh waters. Cytometry, 37, pp. 247-254.<br />

Dubelaar G. B. J., Jonker R. R., 2000. Flow cytometry as a tool <strong>for</strong> the study of<br />

phytoplankton. Scientia Marina, 64, pp. 135-156.<br />

Engel A., Zon<strong>de</strong>rvan I., Aerts K., Beau<strong>for</strong>t L., Benthien A., Chou L., Delille B.,<br />

Gattuso J.-P., Harlay J., Heemann C., Hoffmann L., Jacquet S., Nejstgaard<br />

J., Pizay M.-D., Rochelle-Newall E., Schnei<strong>de</strong>r U., Terbrueggen A., Riebesell<br />

U., 2005. Testing the direct effect of CO2 concentration on a bloom of the<br />

coccolithophorid Emiliania huxleyi in mesocosm experiments. Limnology<br />

and Oceanography, 50, pp. 493-507.<br />

Eppley R. W., Loeller P., Wallace J. G. T., 1978. Stirring influences the<br />

phytoplankton species composition within enclosed columns of coastal<br />

sea water. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 32,<br />

pp. 219-239.<br />

Falkowski P. G., 1994. The role of phytoplankton photosynthesis in global<br />

biogeochemical cycles. Photosynthesis Research, 39, pp. 235-258.


Part IV – Chapter 3 325<br />

Falkowski P. G., Woodhead A. D., 1992. Primary productivity and<br />

biogeochemical cycles in the sea. Plenum Press, New York, USA.<br />

Falkowski, P.G., Fenchel T., Delong E.F., 2008. The microbial engines that<br />

drive Earth’s biogeochemical cycles. Science 320, pp. 1034-1039.<br />

Falter J. L., Atkinson M. J., Fleming J. H., Bos M. M., Lowe R. J., Koseff J. R.,<br />

Monismith S. G., 2006. A novel flume <strong>for</strong> simulating the effects of wavedriven<br />

water motion on the biogeochemistry of benthic reef communities.<br />

Limonlogy and Oceanography: Methods, 4, pp. 68-79.<br />

Fernando H. J. S., 1991. Turbulent mixing in stratified fluids. Annual Review<br />

of Fluid Mechanics, 23, pp. 455-493.<br />

Franck D. M., Hamilton J. F., Ward J. E., Shumay S. E., 2007. A fiber optic sensor<br />

<strong>for</strong> high resolution measurement and continuous monitoring of valve gape<br />

in bivalve molluscs. Journal of Shellfish Research, 26, pp. 575-580.<br />

Gibson C. H., Thomas W. H., 1995. Effects of turbulence intermittency on<br />

growth inhibition of a red ti<strong>de</strong> dinoflagellate Gonyaulax Polyedra stein.<br />

Journal of Geophysical Research, 100, pp. 24841-24846.<br />

Gray C., Bruce T., 1995. The application of particle image velocimetry (PIV) to<br />

offshore engineering, in: Proceedings of the 5th international offshore and<br />

polar engineering conference, The Hague, 11-16 June 1995. International<br />

society of offshore and polar engineers (Isope), 3, pp. 701-708.<br />

Grice G. D., Reeve M. R., 1982. Introduction and <strong>de</strong>scription of experimental<br />

ecosystems, in: Grice G. D., Reeve M. R. (Eds) Marine mesocosms.<br />

Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 1-9.<br />

Griffith P. C., Cubit J. D., A<strong>de</strong>y W. H., Norris J. N., 1987. Computer-automated<br />

flow respirometry: metabolism measurements on a Caribbean reef and in<br />

a microcosm. Limnology and Oceanography, 32, pp. 442-451.<br />

Hill P. S., Nowell A. R. M., Jumars P. A., 1992. Encounter rate by turbulent<br />

shear of particles similar in diameter to the Kolmogorov scale. Journal of<br />

Marine Research, 50, pp. 643-668.<br />

Howarth R. W., Butler T., Lun<strong>de</strong> K., Swaney D., Chu C. R., 1993. Turbulence<br />

and planktonic nitrogen fixation: a mesocosm experiment. Limnology<br />

and Oceanography, 38, pp. 1696-1711.<br />

Intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC), 2007. Climate Change<br />

2007: The physical science basis, Contribution of working group I to<br />

the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental panel on climate<br />

change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.<br />

Jørgensen B. B., Revsbech N. P., 1985. Diffusive boundary layers and the<br />

oxygen uptake of sediments and <strong>de</strong>tritus. Limnology and Oceanography,<br />

30, pp. 111-122.<br />

Karp-Boss L., Boss E., Jumars P. A., 1996. Nutrient fluxes to planktonic<br />

osmotrophs in the presence of fluid motion. Oceanography and Marine<br />

Biology, 34, pp. 71-107.


326 Integrated studies<br />

Kim J. A., Lee K., Shin K., Kang J. H., Lee H. W., Kim M., Jang P. G., Jang<br />

M. C., 2006. The effect of seawater CO 2<br />

concentration on growth of a<br />

natural phytoplankton assemblage in a controlled mesocosm experiment.<br />

Limnology and Oceanography, 51, pp. 1629-1636.<br />

Kim J. A., Shin K., Lee K., Park b. K., 2008. In situ ecosystem-based carbon<br />

dioxi<strong>de</strong> perturbation experiments: <strong>de</strong>sign and per<strong>for</strong>mance evaluation of a<br />

mesocosm facility. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 6, pp. 208-217.<br />

Kotak B. G., Robinson G. G. C., 1991. Artificially-induced water turbulence<br />

and the physical and biological features within small enclosures. Archiv<br />

fur Hydrobiologie, 122, pp. 335-349.<br />

Kraus N. C., Lohrmann A., Cabrera R., 1994. New acoustic meter <strong>for</strong> measuring<br />

3D laboratory flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 120, pp. 406-412.<br />

Laws E. A., 1991. Photosynthetic quotients, new production, net community<br />

production in the open ocean. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic<br />

Research Papers, 38, pp. 143-167.<br />

Leclerc N., Gattuso J.-P., Jaubert J., 1999. Measurement of oxygen metabolism<br />

in open-top aquatic mesocosms: application to a coral reef community.<br />

Marine Ecology Progress Series, 177, pp. 299-304.<br />

Lefebvre A., 2006. Rapport Marel Carnot 2006, Ifremer internal report.<br />

Laboratoire côtier Environnement, littoral et ressources aquacoles,<br />

Boulogne-sur-Mer.<br />

Lewandowska A., Sommer U., 2010. Climate change and the spring bloom:<br />

a mesocosm study on the influence of light and temperature on<br />

phytoplankton and mesozooplankton. Marine Ecology Progress Series,<br />

405, pp. 101-111.<br />

Liboriussen L., Landkil<strong>de</strong>hus F., Meerhoff M., Bramm M. E., Son<strong>de</strong>rgaard<br />

M., Christoffersen K., Richardson K., Son<strong>de</strong>rgaard M., Lauridsen T. L.,<br />

Jeppesen E., 2005. Global warming: <strong>de</strong>sign of a flow-through shallow lake<br />

mesocosm climate experiment. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods,<br />

3, pp. 1-9.<br />

Loisel H., Bosc E., Stramski D., Oubelkheir K., Deschamps P.-Y., 2001. Seasonal<br />

variability of the backscattering coefficients in the Mediterranean Sea<br />

based on Satellite SeaWIFS imagery. Geophysical Research Letters, 28,<br />

pp. 4203-4206.<br />

Loisel H., Nicolas J. M., Sciandra A., Stramski D., Poteau A., 2006. Spectral<br />

<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ncy of optical backscattering by marine particles from satellite<br />

remote sensing of the global ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111,<br />

pp. 1-14.<br />

Lorenzen C. J., 1966 A method <strong>for</strong> the continuous measurement of in vivo<br />

chlorophyll concentration. Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic<br />

Abstracts, 13, pp. 223-227.<br />

MacIntyre S., Alldredge A. L., Gotschalk C. C., 1995. Accumulation of marine<br />

snow at <strong>de</strong>nsity discontinuities in the water column. Limnology and<br />

Oceanography, 40, pp. 449-468.


Part IV – Chapter 3 327<br />

Manizza M., Le Quere C., Watson A. J., Buitenhuis E. T., 2005. Bio-optical<br />

feedbacks among phytoplankton, upper ocean physics and sea-ice in a<br />

global mo<strong>de</strong>l. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, pp. 1-5.<br />

Menzel D. W., Case J., 1977. Concept and <strong>de</strong>sign: controlled ecosystem<br />

pollution experiment. Bulletin of Marine Science, 27, pp. l-7.<br />

Mignot A., Claustre H., D’Ortenzio F., Xing X., Poteau A., Ras J., 2011. From<br />

the shape of the vertical profile of in vivo fluorescence to Chlorophyll-a<br />

concentration. Biogeosciences, 8, pp. 2391-2406.<br />

Moore P. A., Zimmer-Faust R. K., Bement S. L., Weissburg M. J., Parrish J.M.,<br />

Gerhardt G. A., 1992. Measurement of microscale patchiness in a turbulent<br />

aquatic odor plume using a semi-conductor-based microprobe. Biological<br />

bulletin, 183, 138-142.<br />

Mostajir B., Demers S., De Mora S., Belzile C., Chanut J.-P., Gosselin M., Roy<br />

S., Fauchot J., Villegas P. Z., Bouchard J., Bird D., Mon<strong>for</strong>t P., Levasseur<br />

M., 1999. Experimental test of the effect of ultraviolet-B radiation in a<br />

planktonic community. Limnology and Oceanography, 44, pp. 586-596.<br />

Nouguier J., Mostajir B., Le Floc’h E., Vidussi F., 2007. An automatically<br />

operated system <strong>for</strong> simulating global change temperature and ultraviolet<br />

B radiation increases: application to the study of aquatic ecosystem<br />

responses in mesocosm experiments. Limnology and Oceanography:<br />

Methods, 5, pp. 269-279<br />

Olson R. J., Shalapyonok A., Sosik H. M., 2003. An automated submersible<br />

flow cytometer <strong>for</strong> analyzing pico- and nanophytoplankton: FlowCytobot.<br />

Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 50, pp. 301-315.<br />

Olson R. J., Sosik H. M., 2007. A submersible imaging-in-flow instrument to<br />

analyze nano and microplankton: Imaging FlowCytobot. Limnology and<br />

Oceanography: Method, 5, pp. 193-203.<br />

Paresys G., Rigart C., Rousseau B., Wong A. W. M., Fan F., Barbier J.-P.,<br />

Lavaud J., 2005. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of phytoplankton<br />

communities by trichromatic chlorophyll fluorescence excitation with<br />

special focus on cyanobacteria. Water Research, 39, pp. 911-921.<br />

Pestana J. L. T., Alexan<strong>de</strong>r A. C., Culp J. M., Baird D. J., Cessna A. J., Soares A. M.<br />

V. M., 2009. Structural and functional responses of benthic invertebrates<br />

to imidacloprid in outdoor stream mesocosms. Environmental Pollution,<br />

157, pp. 2328-2334.<br />

Pielke Sr R. A., 2008. A broa<strong>de</strong>r view of the role of humans in the climate<br />

system. Physics Today, 61, pp. 54-55.<br />

Reynolds R. A., Stramski D., Mitchell B. G., 2001. A chlorophyll-<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt<br />

semi-analytical reflectance mo<strong>de</strong>l <strong>de</strong>rived from field measurements of<br />

absorption and backscattering coefficients within the Southern Ocean.<br />

Journal of Geophysical Research, 106, pp. 7125-7138.<br />

Riebesell U., Schulz K. G., Bellerby R. G. J., Botros M., Fritsche P., Meyerhöfer<br />

F., Neill C., Nondal G., Oschlies A., Wohlers J., Zöllner E., 2007.<br />

Enhanced biological carbon consumption in a high CO 2<br />

ocean. Nature,<br />

450, pp. 545-548.


328 Integrated studies<br />

Robson A. A., Wilson R. P., Garcia <strong>de</strong> Leaniz C., 2007. Mussels flexing their<br />

muscles: a new method <strong>for</strong> quantifying bivalve behaviour. Marine Biology,<br />

151, pp. 1195-1204.<br />

Robson A. A., Thomas G. R., Garcia <strong>de</strong> Leaniz C., Wilson R. P., 2009. Valve<br />

gape and exhalant pumping in bivalves: optimization of measurement.<br />

Aquatic Biology, 6, pp. 191-200.<br />

Rothschild B. J., Osborn T. R., 1988. Small-scale turbulence and plankton<br />

contact rates. Journal of Plankton Research, 10, pp. 465-474.<br />

Roy S., Mohovic B., Gianesella S. M. F., Schloss I., Ferrario M., Demers S.,<br />

2006. Effects of enhanced UVB on pigment-based phytoplankton biomass<br />

and composition of mesocosm-enclosed natural marine communities<br />

from three latitu<strong>de</strong>s. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 82, pp. 909-922.<br />

San<strong>for</strong>d L. P., 1997. Turbulent mixing in experimental ecosystem studies.<br />

Marine Ecology Progress Series, 161, pp. 265-293.<br />

Sargian P., Mostajir B., Chatila K., Ferrayra G., Pelletier E., Demers S., 2005.<br />

Non-synergistic effects of water soluble cru<strong>de</strong> oil and enhanced ultraviolet-B<br />

radiation on a natural planktonic assemblage. Marine Ecology Progress<br />

Series, 294, pp. 63-77.<br />

Shimeta J., Jumars P. A., 1991. Physical mechanisms and rates of particle capture<br />

by suspension-fee<strong>de</strong>rs. Oceanography and Marine Biology, 29, pp. 191-257.<br />

Sieburth J. Mc. N., Smetacek V., Lenz J., 1978. Pelagic ecosystem structure:<br />

heterotrophic compartments of the plankton and their relationship to<br />

plankton size fractions. Limnology and Oceanography, 23, pp. 1256-1263.<br />

Sieracki C. K., Sieracki M. E., Yentsch C. M., 1998. An imaging in flow system<br />

<strong>for</strong> automated analysis of microplankton. Marine Ecology Progress Series,<br />

168, pp. 285-296.<br />

Sonntag N. C., Parsons T. R., 1979. Mixing an enclosed, 1300 cubic meter<br />

water column: effects on the planktonic food web. Journal of Plankton<br />

Research, 1, pp. 85-102.<br />

Sosik H. M., Olson R. J., 2007. Automated taxonomic classification of<br />

phytoplankton sampled with imaging-in-flow cytometry. Limnology and<br />

Oceanography: Methods, 5, pp. 204-216.<br />

Sosik H. M., Olson R. J., Neubert M. G. Shalapyonok A., Solow A. R., 2003<br />

Growth rates of coastal phytoplankton from time-series measurements<br />

with a submersible flow cytometer. Limnology and Ocenaography, 48,<br />

pp. 1756 -1765.<br />

Squires K. D., Yamazaki H., 1995. Preferential concentration of marine<br />

particles in isotropic turbulence. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic<br />

Research Papers, 42, pp. 1989-2004.<br />

Stramska M., Stramski D., Hapter R., Kaezmarek S., Ston J., 2003. Bio-optical<br />

relationships and ocean colour algorithms <strong>for</strong> the north polar region of the<br />

Atlantic. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, pp. 3143-3159.<br />

Stramski D., Reynolds R. A., Kahru M., Mitchell B. G., 1999. Estimation of<br />

particulate organic carbon in the ocean from satellite remote sensing.<br />

Science, 285, pp. 239-242.


Part IV – Chapter 3 329<br />

Thingstad T. F., Havskum H., Zweifel U. L., Berdalet E., Sala M. M., Peters F.,<br />

Alcaraz M., Scharek R., Perez M., Jacquet S., Flaten F. G. A., Dolan J. R.,<br />

Marrasé C., Rassoulza<strong>de</strong>gan F., Hagstrom A., Vaulot D., 2007. Ability of<br />

a “minimum” microbial food web mo<strong>de</strong>l to reproduce response patterns<br />

observed in mesocosms manipulated with N and P, glucose, and Si. Journal<br />

of Marine Systems, 64, pp. 15-34.<br />

Thouron D., Vuillemin R., Philippon X., Lourenco A., Provost C., Cruzado A.,<br />

Garçon V., 2003. An autonomous nutrient analyzer <strong>for</strong> oceanic long-term in<br />

situ biogeochemical monitoring. Analytical Chemistry, 75, pp. 2601-2609.<br />

Thyssen M., Tarran G. A., Zubkov M. V. Holland R. J., Gregori G., Burkill<br />

P. H., Denis M., 2008. The emergence of automated high frequency flow<br />

cytometry: revealing temporal and spatial phytoplankton variability.<br />

Journal of Plankton Research, 30, pp. 333-343.<br />

Trivett D. A., Snow J. W., 1995. Combined velocity-<strong>de</strong>nsity-vorticity sensor:<br />

fully three-dimensional acoustic flow sensor measures small-scale velocities,<br />

physical measurements simultaneously. Sea Technology, 36, pp. 27-32.<br />

Varney M. S., 2000. Chemical <strong>Sensors</strong> in Oceanography. Gordon and Breach<br />

Sciences publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.<br />

Vidussi F., Mostajir B., Fouilland E., Le Floc’h E., Nouguier J., Roques C., Got<br />

P., Thibault-Botha D., Bouvier T., Troussellier M., 2011. Mediterranean<br />

plankton food web responses to experimental warming and ultraviolet B<br />

increases. Limnology and Oceanography, 56, pp. 206-218.<br />

Vuillemin R., Sanfilippo L., Moscetta P., Zudaire L., Carbones E., Maria E.,<br />

Tricoire C., Oriol L., Blain S., Le Bris N., Lebaron P., 2009. Continuous<br />

nutrient automated monitoring on the Mediterranean Sea using in situ flow<br />

analyser, in: Proceedings of Oceans 2009. MTS/IEEE, 1-3, pp. 517-524.<br />

Weatherhead E. C., An<strong>de</strong>rsen S. B., 2006. The search <strong>for</strong> a sign of recovery of<br />

ozone layer. Nature, 441, pp. 39-45.<br />

Webb T. J., Van<strong>de</strong>n Berghe E., O’Dor R., 2010. Biodiversity’s big wet secret:<br />

the global distribution of marine biological records reveals chronic un<strong>de</strong>rexploration<br />

of the <strong>de</strong>ep pelagic ocean. PloS One, 5, e10223.<br />

Weyl P. K., 1964. On the change in electrical conductance of seawater with<br />

temperature. Limnology and Oceanography, 9, pp. 75-78.<br />

Williams P. J. le B., 1993. Chemical and tracer methods of measuring plankton<br />

production. ICES Marine Science Symposia, 197, pp. 20-36.<br />

Williams P. J. le B, Robertson J. E., 1991. Overall planktonic oxygen and<br />

carbon dioxi<strong>de</strong> metabolisms: the problem of reconciling observations and<br />

calculations of photosynthetic quotients. Journal of Plankton Research,<br />

13, pp. 153-169.<br />

Wyatt T., Ribera d’Alcala M., 2006. Dissolved organic matter and planktonic<br />

engineering, in: Production and fate of dissolved organic matter in the<br />

Mediterranean Sea. CIESM Workshop Monographs, 28, pp. 13-24.


Synthesis and conclusion<br />

Jean-François Le Galliard, Jean-Marc Guarini and Françoise Gaill<br />

1. Finale<br />

Advances in ecological sciences <strong>de</strong>pend on a tight interaction between<br />

observation of nature, experimentation, and mo<strong>de</strong>lling. Relevant to all<br />

three approaches is the availability of high-quality data about physical,<br />

chemical and biological variables, and there<strong>for</strong>e the <strong>de</strong>velopment of<br />

appropriate instruments and sensors. The content of this book <strong>de</strong>monstrates<br />

that the use of sensors has allowed great conceptual progresses<br />

including un<strong>de</strong>rstanding animal physiology and behaviour, assessing<br />

biodiversity and quantifying states and processes of entire ecosystems.<br />

<strong>Sensors</strong> are now critical to explore ecological systems that remain difficult<br />

to access or sample. For example, sensors were necessary to the discovery<br />

and <strong>de</strong>scription of new life supports un<strong>de</strong>r “extreme” environmental<br />

conditions such as <strong>de</strong>ep-sea ecosystems, the analysis of physiological and<br />

behavioural adaptations of animals in polar conditions, or the observation<br />

from space of global surface compartments of marine ecosystems.<br />

One of the most recent outcomes concerns the quantification of the biological<br />

diversity in its broa<strong>de</strong>st ecological sense, encompassing both the<br />

number and abundance of species and intra-specific variation in the <strong>for</strong>m<br />

and life-history of organisms (see section II). The ability to i<strong>de</strong>ntify automatically,<br />

to locate and to count organisms is clearly a major improvement<br />

in the “toolbox” of <strong>ecology</strong>. However, there is still a long way to<br />

go to <strong>de</strong>sign shared procedures and fully autonomous plat<strong>for</strong>ms as those<br />

required <strong>for</strong> marine pelagic environments. <strong>Sensors</strong> play a critical role in<br />

ecosystem studies focusing on measuring stocks (e.g., plant, soil, or carbon<br />

biomass), fluxes of molecules in solid, liquid or gaseous media, and functional<br />

processes (e.g., photosynthesis). In these perspectives, sensors have<br />

greatly improved both in terms of quality and diversity over the past last<br />

years. They enable faster, more accurate and less invasive quantification<br />

of whole-ecosystem components in the field (section III). Once again, the<br />

trends and needs are in the <strong>de</strong>velopment of autonomous plat<strong>for</strong>ms based


332 Synthesis and conclusion<br />

on networks of sensors. This is clearly an important step that needs to<br />

be fulfilled to be able to <strong>de</strong>scribe and mo<strong>de</strong>l entire ecosystems at local,<br />

regional or global scales, or un<strong>de</strong>r experimental conditions (section IV).<br />

2. Next generation sensors: synthesis<br />

2.1. Bio-logging and bio-tracking<br />

Technological advances in the fields of material <strong>de</strong>sign, optics and<br />

imagery, chemistry, communications, and computers have sped up the<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment of next generation sensors providing higher quality as<br />

well as new types of data (Benson et al., 2010; Porter et al., 2009). Yan<br />

Ropert-Cou<strong>de</strong>rt et al. (I, 1) have <strong>de</strong>monstrated this very clearly regarding<br />

bio-logging, which focuses on measuring physiological and behavioural<br />

variables of animals in their natural environment. For this, they used sensors<br />

and loggers that were directly attached on the animal (i.e. bio-loggers).<br />

The quantity and quality of variables that mo<strong>de</strong>rn bio-loggers can<br />

record has steadily increased, because technology improved at the same<br />

time power sources, data storage capacities, sensors characteristics and<br />

communication <strong>de</strong>vices, allowing trends towards smaller dimensions and<br />

lighter weight. New technologies recently <strong>de</strong>veloped in other disciplines<br />

(image and vi<strong>de</strong>o acquisition <strong>de</strong>vices, miniaturised GPS, biomedical sensors)<br />

are also ad<strong>de</strong>d on mo<strong>de</strong>rn bio-loggers. Nowadays, the community<br />

of bio-logging is equipped with a broad range of sensors that started a<br />

conceptual revolution in eco-physiological studies. The next steps in this<br />

field of <strong>ecology</strong> will be to <strong>de</strong>velop smaller bio-loggers able to track and<br />

study smaller animals, as stressed by Guillaume et al. (II, 2). This is a<br />

relevant point <strong>for</strong> a large community of researchers who addresses already<br />

many key issues (e.g., surveys of avian migration or <strong>de</strong>cline of pollinators),<br />

<strong>for</strong> which mo<strong>de</strong>l species are still too small to be equipped with the<br />

bio-loggers currently available (Bridge et al., 2011). Another important<br />

step <strong>for</strong>ward in eco-physiology is the <strong>de</strong>velopment of non invasive remote<br />

sensing techniques that can <strong>de</strong>tect movement, behaviour, or physiological<br />

state of animals without interfering with their normal behaviour. Samaran<br />

et al. (I, 3) as well as Huetz and Aubin (I, 4) have <strong>de</strong>monstrated how<br />

passive acoustic sensors can be used to i<strong>de</strong>ntify species, track animals<br />

and study their behaviour in both aquatic and terrestrial environments.<br />

Similar progresses in animal behaviour and physiology have been ma<strong>de</strong><br />

recently using other techniques like remote image sensing, vi<strong>de</strong>o analyses<br />

and thermography (McCafferty et al., 2011).


Synthesis and conclusion 333<br />

2.2. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning<br />

Working out accurate biodiversity scenarios and un<strong>de</strong>rstanding the coupling<br />

between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning are two of the great<br />

challenges of mo<strong>de</strong>rn <strong>ecology</strong> (Leadley et al., 2010; Loreau, 2010). A large<br />

range of advanced physical, chemical and biological sensors are now available<br />

to measure eco-geochemical processes (Benson et al., 2010; Porter et<br />

al., 2009). Today, technological advances emphasise autonomy, ruggedness,<br />

and resistance to drift of standard “lab-benched” analytical sensors<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e their <strong>de</strong>ployment in the field. The chapters by Le Bris et al. (III,<br />

1 and III, 2) and that of Mostajir et al. (IV, 3) advocate <strong>for</strong> more autonomous<br />

and less invasive sensors because it is critical to study the short<br />

scale spatial heterogeneity and temporal variability of chemical gradients.<br />

However, these authors also pointed out that there are still critical limits<br />

against the long-term <strong>de</strong>ployment of chemical sensors in the field, and the<br />

quantity of environmental factors that can be recor<strong>de</strong>d <strong>for</strong> the purpose of<br />

long-term monitoring programs often remains small.<br />

The i<strong>de</strong>a to measure and monitor proxies of biodiversity automatically has<br />

led to the <strong>de</strong>velopment of a new generation of “biodiversity sensors” during<br />

the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> (this book). I<strong>de</strong>ally, these sensors should be able to track<br />

automatically species or morph abundance and diversity in space and time,<br />

and could also be used to quantify biodiversity below the species taxonomic<br />

level accurately. As exemplified in the four chapters specifically <strong>de</strong>dicated to<br />

biodiversity and in other chapters alluding to the same matter throughout<br />

the book, this i<strong>de</strong>a will require the use of multi-source data from remote<br />

sensing methods, image analyses, or genosensors. Sueur et al. (II, 1) reviewed<br />

advanced acoustic methods to estimate the species diversity of singing<br />

amphibians, birds and insects. Imagery and spectrometry sensors carried<br />

into aircrafts and satellites are also used routinely to study biodiversity (see<br />

III, 3 and IV, 2). The more advanced instruments are characterised by greater<br />

spatial and spectral resolutions (Ustin et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2010). For<br />

example, imaging spectroscopy of ground surfaces at high resolutions (less<br />

than 10m and with bandwidths of 10-20 nms) can be used to i<strong>de</strong>ntify tree<br />

species, to map vegetation and land covers, or to track invasive plant species.<br />

With standard multispectral sensors such as those implemented on<br />

Landsat or Modis satellites, a new range of analytical imagery solutions<br />

help to <strong>de</strong>convulate the spectral signals in or<strong>de</strong>r to <strong>de</strong>tect additional biological<br />

items. Alvain et al. (III, 3) have <strong>de</strong>monstrated how such analytical<br />

progresses have led to build accurate maps of major phytoplanktonic<br />

groups at the surface of the global ocean. Moreover, the use of remote<br />

sensing imagery is not limited to the taxonomic i<strong>de</strong>ntification and biodiversity<br />

mapping only, but expands rapidly toward the <strong>de</strong>velopment of<br />

indices of carbon or dry matter stocks, estimates of biochemical variables,


334 Synthesis and conclusion<br />

and calculation of functional processes (e.g., Kokaly et al., 2009). This<br />

trend is discussed using data from satellite imagery, light <strong>de</strong>tection and<br />

ranging application (LIDAR), or radar satellites in two chapters, the first<br />

one by Alvain et al. (III, 3) on oceanic ecosystems and the second one<br />

by Chave et al. (IV, 2) proposing a review on tropical rain<strong>for</strong>ests studies.<br />

Pontallier and Soudani (III, 4) have shown that remote sensing technologies<br />

from space also stimulate the <strong>de</strong>velopment of in situ sensors that can<br />

be <strong>de</strong>ployed above plant canopy, on flux towers <strong>for</strong> example. These in situ<br />

sensors have a great potential to characterise the dynamics of vegetation<br />

in real time with limited costs and maintenance.<br />

Another application of “digital eyes” technology is the pattern recognition<br />

in natural samples. The cameras <strong>de</strong>veloped by Gorsky, Stemman and their<br />

research group (II, 2) are, <strong>for</strong> instance, capable of sorting particles from<br />

pelagic oceanic samples by type and by size, including <strong>de</strong>tecting nonliving<br />

particles and i<strong>de</strong>ntifying a substantial fraction of marine zooplankton.<br />

This technological improvement has led to a tremendous change in<br />

the capacity to quantify marine particles compared to what was done with<br />

sediment traps or discrete sampling in the water column. Pattern recognition<br />

techniques are also used in plant physiology, agronomy and eco-morphology<br />

to measure the <strong>for</strong>m of plants and animals, and are sometimes<br />

grouped together with eco-physiology, functional genomics and metabolomics<br />

into the so-called “phenomics” techniques of biotechnology. Plant<br />

phenomics is un<strong>de</strong>r rapid <strong>de</strong>velopment in agronomy but relies on greenhouse<br />

protocols that are ina<strong>de</strong>quate <strong>for</strong> ecological studies and use imagery<br />

techniques that still require to be tested in the field (Eberius and Lima-<br />

Guerra, 2009). Yet, the transfer of lab-benched phenomics into field conditions<br />

holds much promise <strong>for</strong> those interested in the un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of<br />

phenotypic diversity and biological adaptations (Houle, 2010). Mallard et<br />

al. (II, 4) <strong>de</strong>scribes how a simple pattern recognition method can be used<br />

in microcosms to locate, count and measure the size of individual arthropods.<br />

Similar approaches need to be tested and implemented in the field<br />

and should be exten<strong>de</strong>d to study other taxonomic groups.<br />

Concerning the characterisation of biodiversity, an alternative to remote<br />

sensing and image analysis mentioned above is the use of genetic barco<strong>de</strong>s<br />

from water or soil samples, or living tissues. A first approach, called<br />

environmental metabarcoding, requires the sampling, extraction and<br />

amplification of multiple barco<strong>de</strong>s and the subsequent sequencing with<br />

high throughput technologies (Jørgensen et al., 2012). However, metabarcoding<br />

techniques are difficult to adapt into autonomous sensors in the<br />

field. Some laboratory-based alternatives allow near-real-time <strong>de</strong>tection<br />

of toxic marine algae and other microorganisms. They have the potential<br />

to be <strong>de</strong>ployed in the field in a near future, and were <strong>de</strong>scribed here by<br />

Orozco et al. (II, 3). These alternatives rely on the existence of taxon-


Synthesis and conclusion 335<br />

specific genetic barco<strong>de</strong>s, but seek <strong>for</strong> <strong>de</strong>tecting these barco<strong>de</strong>s (using<br />

amplification or hybridisation techniques) rather than sequencing them<br />

exhaustively. The field portable versions of these lab-benched techniques<br />

are called genosensors and some of them are un<strong>de</strong>r <strong>de</strong>velopment <strong>for</strong> few<br />

years in marine <strong>ecology</strong> (Paul et al., 2007; Scholin, 2010). This inclu<strong>de</strong>s<br />

the autonomous microbial genosensor (AMG) and the environmental<br />

sample processor (ESP) used <strong>for</strong> real-time studies of bacterioplankton and<br />

invertebrates (figure 1). Jahir orozco et al. (II, 3) have <strong>de</strong>monstrated that<br />

it is still extremely difficult to standardise genetic protocols when the<br />

interest is to calculate real cell counts. In addition, the method is suitable<br />

<strong>for</strong> fluids, but it is not easy to implement in hard substrates, such as soils<br />

and benthic sediments. There<strong>for</strong>e, much progress remains to be done to<br />

import genetic methods into autonomous sensors installed in the field.<br />

Figure 1: This field-portable genosensor, called the environmental sample processor<br />

(ESP), can be <strong>de</strong>ployed during several months to monitor the diversity and toxicity<br />

of marine bacterioplankton. The ESP is a collaborative project coordinated by<br />

Christopher Scholin and fun<strong>de</strong>d by the Monterey bay Aquarium Research Institute,<br />

National Science Foundation, and NASA. It is based on the electrochemical biosensor<br />

based methods <strong>de</strong>scribed by Jahir orozco et al. in this book, and allows real-time<br />

monitoring of a diversity of marine species. © Kim Fulton-bennet/2006 MAbRI.


336 Synthesis and conclusion<br />

2.3. Towards integrated knowledge of ecosystems<br />

Despite strong differences among sensor types and technologies, several<br />

authors of this book drew similar perspectives <strong>for</strong> the future. The first<br />

shared opinion is that recent progresses in <strong>ecology</strong> have been achieved<br />

through similar technological improvements including increased miniaturisation,<br />

increased autonomy, and increased communication capacities.<br />

The need <strong>for</strong> sensors that present these three traits is critical in <strong>ecology</strong><br />

when observations must be conducted <strong>for</strong> long periods of time in remote<br />

areas (Porter et al., 2009) and must be as non-invasive as possible. There<br />

is however an obvious tra<strong>de</strong>-off between miniaturisation and increased<br />

communication capacities on one si<strong>de</strong> and autonomy on the other si<strong>de</strong>.<br />

Various alternatives exist to reduce consumption (including pre-programmation<br />

of sampling and communication rates) and to increase power<br />

capacities (including renewable energy sources as solar panels and wind or<br />

hydro-turbines). Miniaturisation is also important because the smaller the<br />

sensors the less they interfere with the dynamics or the behaviour of the<br />

studied systems. Most <strong>ecology</strong> laboratories in France are far from reaching<br />

the ability to address all of these technological challenges when <strong>de</strong>signing<br />

and constructing sensors. There<strong>for</strong>e, a stronger priority must be given to<br />

collaborative research and <strong>de</strong>velopment projects involving environmental<br />

scientists, engineers and specialists in in<strong>for</strong>matics or telecommunication.<br />

Most studies also emphasise the need <strong>for</strong> a<strong>de</strong>quate and representative spatial<br />

coverage to study spatial ecological processes. Even if it is not a major<br />

issue <strong>for</strong> remote sensing from space, the question of ina<strong>de</strong>quate spatial coverage<br />

raises serious concerns to interpretation and analysis of data collected<br />

by in situ sensors. The challenge rests on the fact that most ecological phenomena<br />

exhibit spatial structures at multiple scales from a few millimetres<br />

to hundreds of kilometres, and that most ecological systems <strong>de</strong>monstrate<br />

characteristic patterns only at certain spatial scales (Levin, 1992; Wiens,<br />

1989). Several technological solutions are now available to cope with this<br />

problem, <strong>de</strong>pending on the spatial scale of investigation. At broad spatial<br />

scales (i.e. hundreds of kilometres range), ecological patterns are best<br />

addressed by remote sensing and network of autonomous stations such as<br />

buoys on oceans and towers on continents. These types of measurements<br />

have a long tradition in oceanography, <strong>for</strong>estry and hydrology. At regional<br />

and local scales, standard networks of sensors typically had small spatial<br />

and temporal resolution until the recent <strong>de</strong>velopment of wireless technologies<br />

(Porter et al., 2005). The wireless network technology, of which Chave<br />

et al. discuss one potential application (IV, 2), allows high-frequency observations,<br />

intensive and inexpensive sampling over large areas up to tens of<br />

kilometres, non-intrusive sampling of study sites, and real-time reactions<br />

(figure 2). Generally speaking, long-term approaches conducted at large<br />

spatial scales are beyond the scope of a single laboratory program and


Synthesis and conclusion 337<br />

require coordination and shared procedures among an entire international<br />

community of scientists. This is well <strong>de</strong>monstrated by the Argos oceanographic<br />

network <strong>de</strong>scribed by Stemmann et al. (IV, 1).<br />

Figure 2. A wireless network of sensors <strong>de</strong>veloped by the Fraunhofer Institute <strong>for</strong><br />

Microelectronic Circuits and Systems (IMS, Germany) installed on the grounds of<br />

the Northwest German Forestry Testing Facility in Göttingen. The wireless network<br />

enables real-time measurements of environmental data during a <strong>de</strong>ployment period<br />

of up to 12 months. © Fraunhofer IMS.<br />

In addition to specific requirements of temporal and spatial coverage,<br />

most ecologists emphasise the strong need to integrate multiple types of<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation, which usually implies to collect at the same time and in<br />

the same place both physical, chemical and biological data (e.g. Sagarin<br />

and Pauchard, 2010). The integration of multiple sensors is an extremely<br />

difficult task, given the costs, amount of data types and need <strong>for</strong> evolvability<br />

of multi-sensor plat<strong>for</strong>ms. Modular equipments provi<strong>de</strong> the best<br />

solution to accommodate multiple sensor types and anticipate technological<br />

changes. Strong improvements in data streaming, data processing and<br />

storing capacities must be achieved compared to standard procedures to<br />

customise multi-sensors network. Priority must be given to real-time acquisition<br />

and processing, open source tools, and freely available data sets,<br />

which requires a strong cooperation with computer scientists (Benson et<br />

al., 2010). This book <strong>de</strong>monstrates the feasibility and usefulness of some<br />

sensor networks that collect physical and chemical data in oceanography


338 Synthesis and conclusion<br />

or <strong>for</strong>estry (Le Bris et al., III, 1; Stemman et al., IV, 1; Chave et al., IV, 2).<br />

There is now a clear need to expand these networks in or<strong>de</strong>r to collect at<br />

the same time biological data on the presence and abundance of species<br />

of interest (see section IV).<br />

4. Next generation sensors: perspectives <strong>for</strong> infrastructures<br />

Well-organised networks of observational and experimental infrastructures<br />

are critical <strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>velopment and use of next generation sensors.<br />

These infrastructures can help to <strong>de</strong>sign and test new types of sensor and<br />

are i<strong>de</strong>al places to promote the long-term <strong>de</strong>ployment of sensors and to<br />

test the relevance of integrated in<strong>for</strong>mation from multiple sensors types.<br />

For example, observational and experimental programs conducted in the<br />

Long-term Ecological Research (LTER) network, National Ecological<br />

Observatory Network (NEON) and ocean observatories initiative in the<br />

USA have all been <strong>de</strong>voted to the <strong>de</strong>velopment of new sensors technology<br />

(Benson et al., 2010; Porter et al., 2009).<br />

Several authors of this book are involved in similar infrastructures at a<br />

national or international level. For the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>, the CNRS in France<br />

has promoted a range of observational and experimental infrastructures,<br />

which should <strong>for</strong>m the basis <strong>for</strong> the <strong>de</strong>velopment of next generation sensors<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>ecology</strong>. Regarding observational infrastructures, various specialised<br />

environmental science observatory networks managed or supported<br />

by the CNRS exist, including a network <strong>de</strong>dicated to greenhouse gas<br />

monitoring (Icos, http://www.icos-infrastructure.eu/), a critical zone<br />

exploration network <strong>de</strong>dicated to geochemical and hydrological processes<br />

on continents (http://www.czen.org/), and several national and international<br />

oceanographic networks such as the Naos project coordinated by<br />

Ifremer (http://www.naos-equipex.fr/). In addition, the CNRS is strongly<br />

involved in the management and support of a LTER-like network that<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>s 10 study sites scattered in France and overseas (http://www.cnrs.<br />

fr/inee/outils/za.htm). This network inclu<strong>de</strong>s regional study sites where<br />

the coupled dynamics of ecosystems and societies are investigated on the<br />

long-term with a multidisciplinary approach. All these study sites rely<br />

strongly on sensor networks <strong>for</strong> monitoring the environmental and ecosystem<br />

processes.<br />

Regarding experimental infrastructures, the project ANAEE (analysis and<br />

experimentation on ecosystem), supported by the CNRS in partnership<br />

with INRA, is registered on the roadmap of the European ESFRI program<br />

with a preparation phase planned from 2011 to 2014 (http://www.anaee.<br />

com/). It will bring together the major experimental facilities in continental


Synthesis and conclusion 339<br />

Figure 3: Infrastructures in experimental <strong>ecology</strong> managed by the Institute Ecology<br />

and Environment of the CNRS in France belong to the ANAEE European research<br />

infrastructure. In ANAEE, research infrastructures encompass in vivo approaches<br />

(small scale, high manipulative power of Ecotrons), semi-natural situations<br />

(intermediate scales, medium manipulative power), and natural situations (larger<br />

spatio-temporal scales, low manipulative power). A-b. Ecotrons are newly created<br />

infrastructures that enable highly controlled manipulation of terrestrial and aquatic<br />

organisms, communities and ecosystems. In France, this infrastructure consists in the<br />

Ecotron <strong>de</strong> Montpellier (A) specialised in the analysis of terrestrial ecosystems, and the<br />

Ecotron Ile-<strong>de</strong>-France (B) specialised in the analysis of aquatic ecosystems. C-D. The<br />

semi-natural plat<strong>for</strong>m inclu<strong>de</strong>s facilities that enable manipulation of terrestrial and<br />

aquatic organisms, communities and ecosystems un<strong>de</strong>r partially controlled situations.<br />

In France, it inclu<strong>de</strong>s of the national aquatic <strong>ecology</strong> plat<strong>for</strong>m (C) located nearby Paris,<br />

and a large infrastructure of experimental meta-ecosystems located nearby Toulouse<br />

(D). E-F. In natura experimental sites are long-term experimental facilities allowing<br />

simultaneous measurements of key ecosystem variables and parameters through<br />

a multi-disciplinary approach. They inclu<strong>de</strong> experimental grasslands and <strong>for</strong>ests<br />

supported by the CNRS and several other institutional partners such as the Nouragues<br />

tropical rain<strong>for</strong>est (E) and the alpine grasslands of the Lautaret (F). © CNRS.


340 Synthesis and conclusion<br />

ecosystem sciences in a distributed and coordinated network (Lemaire,<br />

2008). Selected experimental plat<strong>for</strong>ms from ANAEE will allow simultaneous<br />

manipulation and monitoring of ecosystem processes by collaborative<br />

approaches. Meeting the challenges of ANAEE requires a sustained<br />

research ef<strong>for</strong>t with a range of complementary approaches from highly<br />

controlled facilities to natural systems (see Figure 3). We anticipate that<br />

the financial support provi<strong>de</strong>d <strong>for</strong> these sites will stimulate collaborations<br />

and programs to <strong>de</strong>velop sensors that ecologists will use to explore natural<br />

ecosystems, test ecological theories, and <strong>de</strong>velop predictive mo<strong>de</strong>ls.<br />

Authors’ references<br />

Jean-François Le Galliard:<br />

Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Laboratoire Écologie et Évolution,<br />

CNRS-UPMC-ENS UMR 7625, Paris, France École normale supérieure,<br />

CEREEP – Écotron Ile-<strong>de</strong>-France, CNRS-ENS, UMS 3194, Saint-Pierrelès-Nemours,<br />

France<br />

Jean-Marc Guarini:<br />

Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Laboratoire d’Écogéochimie <strong>de</strong>s<br />

Environnements Benthiques, CNRS-UPMC, FRE 3350, Banyuls-sur-Mer,<br />

France<br />

Françoise Gaill:<br />

CNRS, Institut Écologie et Environnement, Paris, France<br />

Corresponding author: Jean-François Le Galliard, galliard@biologie.<br />

ens.fr<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

Jean-François Le Galliard acknowledges the support of the TGIR Eco trons<br />

program, and of the ANR program “Investissement d’avenir: Equipement<br />

d’excellence” (ANR PLANAQUA 10-EQPX-13-01) coordinated by UMS<br />

3194 CEREEP-Ecotron IleDeFrance.


Synthesis and conclusion 341<br />

References<br />

Benson B.J., Bond B.J., Hamilton M.P., Monson R.K., Hans R., 2010.<br />

Perspectives on next-generation technology <strong>for</strong> environmental sensor<br />

networks. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8 (4), pp. 193-200.<br />

Bridge E.S., Thorup K., Bowlin M.S., Chilson P.B., Diehl R.H., Fleron R.W.,<br />

Hartl P., Kays R., Kelly J.F., Robinson W.D., Wikelski M., 2011. Technology<br />

on the move: recent and <strong>for</strong>thcoming innovations <strong>for</strong> tracking migratory<br />

birds. Bioscience, 61 (9), pp. 689-698.<br />

Eberius M., Lima-Guerra J., 2009. High-throughput plant phenotyping – data<br />

acquisition, trans<strong>for</strong>mation, and analysis. In: Edwards, D., Stajich, J.,<br />

Hansen, D. (Eds.), Bioin<strong>for</strong>matics. Springer, New York, pp. 259-278.<br />

Houle D., 2010. Numbering the hairs on our heads: The shared challenge and<br />

promise of phenomics. Proceedings of the National Aca<strong>de</strong>my of Sciences<br />

of the United States of America, 107, pp. 1793-1799.<br />

Jørgensen T., Kjaer K.H., Haile J., Rasmussen M., boessenkool S.,<br />

An<strong>de</strong>rsen K., Coissac E., Taberlet P., brochmann C., orlando L.,<br />

Gilbert M.T.P., Willerslev E., 2012. Islands in the ice: <strong>de</strong>tecting past<br />

vegetation on Greenlandic nunataks using historical records and<br />

sedimentary ancient DNA Meta-barcoding. Molecular Ecology. doi:<br />

10.1111/j.1365 -294X.2011.05278.x.<br />

Kokaly R.F., Asner G.P., Ollinger S.V., Martin M.E., Wessman C.A., 2009.<br />

Characterizing canopy biochemistry from imaging spectroscopy and its<br />

application to ecosystem studies. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113,<br />

pp. S78-S91.<br />

Leadley P., Pereira H.M., Alkema<strong>de</strong> R., Fernan<strong>de</strong>z-Manjarrés J.F., Proença V.,<br />

Scharlemann J.P.W., Walpole M.J., 2010. Biodiversity Scenarios: Projections<br />

of 21st century change in biodiversity and associated ecosystem services.<br />

Technical Series Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity,<br />

Montreal, p. 132.<br />

Lemaire G., 2008. ANAEE: an innovative concept <strong>for</strong> integrated continental<br />

biosphere research In: Christensen, B.T., Petersen, J., Schacht, M. (Eds.),<br />

Long-term field experiments – a unique research plat<strong>for</strong>m. University<br />

of Aarhus, Askov Experimental Station and Sandbjerg Estat, Denmark,<br />

pp. 80-83.<br />

Levin S.A., 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in <strong>ecology</strong>. Ecology, 73 (6),<br />

pp. 1943-1967.<br />

Loreau M., 2010. From populations to ecosystems: theoretical foundations <strong>for</strong><br />

a new ecological synthesis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.<br />

McCafferty D.J., Gilbert C., Paterson W., Pomeroy P.P., Thompson D., Currie<br />

J.I., Ancel A., 2011. Estimating metabolic heat loss in birds and mammals<br />

by combining infrared thermography with biophysical mo<strong>de</strong>lling.<br />

Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology – Part A: Molecular &<br />

Integrative Physiology, 158 (3), pp. 337-345.


342 Synthesis and conclusion<br />

Paul C., Scholin C., Van Den Engh G., Perry M.J., 2007. In situ instrumentation.<br />

Oceanography, 20 (2), pp. 70-78.<br />

Porter J., Arzberger P., Braun H.W., Bryant P., Gage S., Hansen T., Hanson P.,<br />

Lin C.C., Lin F.P., Kratz T., Michener W., Shapiro S., Williams T., 2005.<br />

Wireless sensor networks <strong>for</strong> <strong>ecology</strong>. Bioscience, 55 (7), pp. 561-572.<br />

Porter J.H., Nagy E., Kratz T.K., Hanson P., Collins S.L., Arzberger P., 2009.<br />

New eyes on the world: advanced sensors <strong>for</strong> <strong>ecology</strong>. Bioscience, 59 (5),<br />

pp. 385-397.<br />

Sagarin R., Pauchard A., 2010. Observational approaches in <strong>ecology</strong> open new<br />

ground in a changing world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,<br />

8 (7), pp. 379-386.<br />

Scholin C.A., 2010. What are “ecogenomic sensors?” A review and thoughts <strong>for</strong><br />

the future. Ocean Science, 6 (1), pp. 51-60.<br />

Ustin S.L., Roberts D.A., Gamon J.A., Asner G.P., Green R.O., 2004. Using<br />

imaging spectroscopy to study ecosystem processes and properties.<br />

Bioscience, 54 (6), pp. 523-534.<br />

Wang K., Franklin S.E., Guo X.L., Cattet M., 2010. Remote sensing of <strong>ecology</strong>,<br />

biodiversity and conservation: a review from the perspective of remote<br />

sensing specialists. <strong>Sensors</strong>, 10 (11), pp. 9647-9667.<br />

Wiens J.A., 1989. Spatial scaling in <strong>ecology</strong>. Functional Ecology, 3, pp. 385-397.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!