26.10.2014 Views

Mehran Midia - The Canadian Pain Society

Mehran Midia - The Canadian Pain Society

Mehran Midia - The Canadian Pain Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Anatomy of Imaging <strong>Pain</strong>ful Spine<br />

In order to utilize appropriate imaging tools in order to diagnose and treat patients with<br />

acute or chronic spinal pain it is essential to:<br />

A. Be familiar with spinal anatomy and pain generators in the spine<br />

B. Have a clear understanding of indication of imaging<br />

C. Order appropriate imaging tool depend on anatomy and etiology in question<br />

D. Understand the limitation of the individual test and interpretation<br />

E. Be systematic and methodical in approaching the clinical question and the<br />

evidence<br />

A- Cause of spinal pain can be divided based on:<br />

Location: Disc, nerve, facet, ligamentum flavum<br />

Etiology: Degenerative, infectious, inflammatory, neoplastic, iatrogenic, etc<br />

And further more could be:<br />

a. Discogenic Due to<br />

a. Expression of inflammatory degenerative disc by-products<br />

b. Direct annular innervations by nociceptive fibers<br />

b. Encroachment of the nerve roots<br />

a. Radiculopathy (disc, facet, lig, muscle)<br />

b. Lateral recess stenosis<br />

c. Neural foraminal stenosis<br />

d. Extra-foraminal (piriformis synd)<br />

e. Spinal canal narrowing (pseudoclaudication)<br />

c. <strong>Pain</strong> from the affected spinal element<br />

a. Facet arthropathy, spinous process<br />

d. Sacroiliac Joint<br />

e. Motion and instability


B- "<strong>The</strong> wise man doesn't give the right answers, he poses the right questions." Claude<br />

Levi-Strauss<br />

“You can tell whether a man is clever by his answers. You can tell whether a man is wise<br />

by his questions." Naguib Mahfouz<br />

In order to get the best out of imaging consultation it is prudent for the refereeing<br />

physician to have taken a full history and examined his or her patient thoroughly and to<br />

communicate their findings to the radiologist.<br />

Imaging yield increases if ordering physician is able to generate and communicate a<br />

specific question or concern rather than working on shut gun approach (GIGO). Also<br />

having more information is helpful for the radiologist to use proper protocol for imaging<br />

and make suggestion for additional imaging if needed.<br />

Question that often arise can be divided into:<br />

1- Confirmation of clinical judgment and establish cause<br />

2- Exclusion of sinister or treatable disease<br />

3- Guide treatment<br />

4- Assess for complications<br />

Social indication of imaging often results in imaging reports with little benefit in overall<br />

patient care and may cause delay in diagnosis if it is not appropriately used.<br />

1- Reassure patient<br />

2- Defensive medicine and medicolegal concerns<br />

3- Buy time<br />

C- Spine can be imaged using conventional x-ray, CT, MRI, Bone Scan, Myelogrpahy,<br />

Discography and Bone Densitometry. <strong>The</strong>se tests could be used stand-alone or in<br />

combination depend on the specific question that is needed to be answered, structure in<br />

question and potential etiology that is being entertained. Conventional x-ray and CT are<br />

useful to assess osseous structures. MRI is essential for assessment of soft tissues and is<br />

the workhorse of spinal imaging for variety of conditions. Intravenous contrast is helpful<br />

when assessing for post surgical scar, infection, tumor or arachnoiditis. CT myelography<br />

is only indicated in assessing patient with spinal hard ware in place when conventional<br />

CT or MR is inconclusive.<br />

D- <strong>The</strong> physician ordering the test should have an understanding of indication and<br />

contraindication of each test, limitations due to inherent techniques, sensitivity,<br />

specificity, accuracy positive and negative predictive value, intra and inter observer<br />

variability of the test they order.<br />

Not knowing these limitations and omitting to investigate the correct piece of anatomy<br />

with the correct investigation could result in sense of false security and significant delay<br />

in proper treatment of their patients. It also this could result in many incidental finding<br />

that could trigger a battery of unnecessary and related investigation.


Always do remember that spine is a window to the spinal cord and is a part of nervous<br />

system. It is wise to look up and down!<br />

E- Following a systematic checklist could be helpful for physicians when reviewing<br />

imaging of their patient presenting with spinal pain.<br />

Using ABCDEFs Spine imaging makes interpreting imaging easy.<br />

Alignment<br />

Bone Density, Bone Marrow<br />

Canal, Cord, Conus Medullaris, Cauda Equina<br />

Disc<br />

Epidural, Extraforaminal, Enhancement<br />

Foramina, Facet, Lig Flavum, Fracture<br />

IJ, Sacrum<br />

Patient with prior back surgery often seek medical attention with persistent or recurrent<br />

symptoms. <strong>The</strong> causes of failed back surgery are as follows:<br />

Early: Hematoma, infection, insufficient decompression, nerve root trauma,<br />

unrecognized disc fragment, Sx at wrong level<br />

Late: Arachnoiditis, Epidural fibrosis, Facet Degeneration, instability, new or<br />

recurrent disc herniation, pseudomenigocele, spinal stenosis, osteomyelitis<br />

In Conclusion:<br />

“<strong>The</strong> radiologist who takes a superficial history and allows it to influence his diagnosis is<br />

a menace. Certain x-ray appearance makes operation desirable, regardless of the<br />

diagnosis suggested by classical clinical medicine. On the other hand, the clinician cannot<br />

shift his/her responsibility to the radiologist. It is his/her duty to ask himself weather the<br />

symptoms can be explained based on the x-ray findings or weather an alternative<br />

explanation is essential. <strong>The</strong> x-ray department can be as good as the clinician it allows it<br />

to be, without the fullest collaboration mistakes and mutual recriminations are<br />

inevitable,”<br />

Book Summary from British Medical Journal page 914 Oct. 22 nd 1949. “Radiologist and<br />

Clinicians” By De M, Chiray et al. Paris 1949.<br />

D. A Jennings

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!