Monitoring Standards & State Self-Assessment Tool - NASCSP
Monitoring Standards & State Self-Assessment Tool - NASCSP Monitoring Standards & State Self-Assessment Tool - NASCSP
IM 82 “State CSBG officials should meet routinely with Boards as part of their overall monitoring of local agencies to determine the extent to which the Boards are aware of, and are carrying out, their responsibilities”
IM 94 “… is an understanding that community action is one agency with one mission - to reduce poverty among low-income people and improve opportunities for their success in their communities. To be effective, all staff, all programs, all Board Members, and all community partners need to work in unison toward this common mission and goal.”
- Page 1 and 2: Monitoring Standards and State Self
- Page 3 and 4: NASCSP Monitoring Workgroup Therefo
- Page 5 and 6: About the CSBG Monitoring Standards
- Page 7 and 8: Monitoring PRACTICES - Monitors sho
- Page 9 and 10: Review Topic Areas Governance Plann
- Page 11 and 12: NASCSP‟s Standard Monitoring Prin
- Page 13 and 14: Success Factors cont. Review audit,
- Page 15 and 16: Success Factors cont. Understand th
- Page 17: IM 49, cont. In IM 49 OCS committed
- Page 21 and 22: IM 94, cont. “…the Community Se
- Page 23 and 24: Assessing Your State‟s Monitoring
- Page 25: QUESTIONS? Credits: Sue Buckley and
IM 82<br />
“<strong>State</strong> CSBG officials should meet<br />
routinely with Boards as part of their<br />
overall monitoring of local agencies to<br />
determine the extent to which the<br />
Boards are aware of, and are carrying<br />
out, their responsibilities”
Change language