Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Panels <strong>we</strong>re chaired by <strong>the</strong> panel chairs appo<strong>in</strong>ted for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Diabetes</strong> Enquiry or by <strong>the</strong> CEMACH regional<br />
manager of that region. Six cases <strong>we</strong>re revie<strong>we</strong>d at each meet<strong>in</strong>g. Cases revie<strong>we</strong>d <strong>we</strong>re selected from<br />
a national pool exclud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> region of <strong>the</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g panel, to ensure an <strong>in</strong>dependent assessment of <strong>the</strong><br />
c<strong>are</strong> provided. Each panel was provided with neonatal records and charts perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> fi rst three days<br />
after delivery, discharge summaries, <strong>the</strong> postnatal maternity notes, any relevant correspondence<br />
and hospital protocols.<br />
12.2.2 Enquiry pro forma<br />
Cl<strong>in</strong>ical guidance for <strong>the</strong> neonatal enquiry was provided by a steer<strong>in</strong>g group of cl<strong>in</strong>icians with specifi c<br />
experience <strong>in</strong> neonatal c<strong>are</strong> for babies of women with diabetes (Appendix F). A structured enquiry pro<br />
forma (accessible at www.cemach.org.uk) was developed <strong>in</strong> consultation with members of <strong>the</strong> steer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
group. This pro forma was designed to assess neonatal c<strong>are</strong> provided on <strong>the</strong> labour ward, <strong>the</strong> postnatal<br />
ward or on <strong>the</strong> neonatal unit.<br />
12.2.3 Standards of c<strong>are</strong><br />
C<strong>are</strong> was assessed aga<strong>in</strong>st standards relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> location of c<strong>are</strong>, blood glucose monitor<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
temperature management and feed<strong>in</strong>g. The cl<strong>in</strong>ical standards for this enquiry <strong>we</strong>re those used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
CEMACH <strong>Diabetes</strong> Programme (accessible at www.cemach.org.uk), with some additional standards<br />
from <strong>the</strong> Baby Friendly Initiative. 3<br />
12.2.4 Enquiry sample<br />
In <strong>the</strong> neonatal enquiry, pregnancies <strong>we</strong>re randomly sampled from <strong>the</strong> diabetes cohort database of 3808<br />
pregnancies after exclud<strong>in</strong>g deaths, fetal congenital anomalies, multiple births and gestation at delivery<br />
less than 37+0 <strong>we</strong>eks. The case defi nition for <strong>the</strong> neonatal enquiry was <strong>the</strong>refore all term pregnancies <strong>in</strong><br />
women with diabetes result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a normally formed baby surviv<strong>in</strong>g to 28 days after delivery. One hundred<br />
and thirty two babies met this case defi nition. Neonatal medical records <strong>we</strong>re not available for 13 babies,<br />
leav<strong>in</strong>g 119 babies for enquiry. These babies <strong>we</strong>re <strong>the</strong>n divided <strong>in</strong>to two groups for fur<strong>the</strong>r comparative<br />
analysis:<br />
• babies who <strong>we</strong>re <strong>in</strong>itially admitted with <strong>the</strong>ir mo<strong>the</strong>r to <strong>the</strong> postnatal ward or to a transitional c<strong>are</strong><br />
unit a , or who stayed with <strong>the</strong>ir mo<strong>the</strong>r on <strong>the</strong> labour ward or a maternal high dependency unit<br />
• babies who <strong>we</strong>re <strong>in</strong>itially admitted to a neonatal unit for special c<strong>are</strong>. b<br />
a<br />
defi ned as units where, if baby needs non <strong>in</strong>tensive treatment and monitor<strong>in</strong>g, mo<strong>the</strong>rs and babies can be c<strong>are</strong>d for toge<strong>the</strong>r under<br />
supervision of neonatal staff.<br />
b<br />
C<strong>are</strong> provided for all babies not receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensive or high dependency c<strong>are</strong> but whose c<strong>are</strong>rs could not reasonably be expected to<br />
look after <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong> hospital or at home (British Association of Per<strong>in</strong>atal Medic<strong>in</strong>e 2001).<br />
83