Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
11.4 Preconception behaviour<br />
The CEMACH report on 3808 pregnancies <strong>in</strong> women with pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g diabetes found a poor level of<br />
<strong>pregnancy</strong> preparation, which was more marked for women with type 2 diabetes. 2 The enquiry module<br />
provided <strong>the</strong> opportunity to exam<strong>in</strong>e differences <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r aspects of preconception behaviour.<br />
11.4.1 Planned <strong>pregnancy</strong> and contraceptive use<br />
Planned <strong>pregnancy</strong> rates <strong>we</strong>re similar for women with type 1 diabetes (60% of 121 women) and type 2<br />
diabetes (62% of 84 women) (p=0.73, table 11.5), comp<strong>are</strong>d to a planned <strong>pregnancy</strong> rate of 58% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
UK <strong>in</strong> 2001-2002. 6 Ho<strong>we</strong>ver, fe<strong>we</strong>r women with type 2 diabetes had evidence of contraceptive use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
12 months prior to <strong>pregnancy</strong> (p=0.001, table 11.5). This suggests that for women with type 2 diabetes,<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g a <strong>pregnancy</strong> does not necessarily equate to <strong>the</strong> use of contraception when not actively try<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
conceive. This may be l<strong>in</strong>ked to cultural beliefs and attitudes, and health professionals need to explore<br />
<strong>the</strong>se issues dur<strong>in</strong>g annual diabetes reviews and pre-<strong>pregnancy</strong> counsell<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
11.4.2 Folic acid<br />
In <strong>the</strong> 2005 CEMACH report, 39% of all women <strong>we</strong>re documented <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> maternity notes or medical<br />
professional correspondence to have commenced folic acid before <strong>pregnancy</strong>, with fe<strong>we</strong>r women with<br />
type 2 diabetes documented to have started folic acid <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preconception period. 2 For <strong>the</strong> enquiry<br />
module, general practitioners and <strong>the</strong> adult diabetes service <strong>we</strong>re asked to provide <strong>in</strong>formation on folic<br />
acid use before <strong>pregnancy</strong>. A higher rate of preconception folic acid use than for <strong>the</strong> full cohort was<br />
reported (49% of women with type 1 diabetes and 45% of women with type 2 diabetes), and <strong>the</strong>re was<br />
no observed difference bet<strong>we</strong>en folic acid use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> two groups of women (p=0.60, Table 11.5).<br />
The difference <strong>in</strong> fi nd<strong>in</strong>gs bet<strong>we</strong>en <strong>the</strong> descriptive study and <strong>the</strong> enquiry may be due to <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>formation on folic acid <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> descriptive study was dependent on documentation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> maternity notes,<br />
whereas <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> enquiry, adult diabetes services and general practitioners <strong>we</strong>re approached for <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
It is also possible that health professionals <strong>we</strong>re less likely to document folic acid use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> maternity<br />
notes or general medical records for women with type 2 diabetes than for women with type 1 diabetes,<br />
perhaps due to issues such as language diffi culties.<br />
Table 11.5<br />
Preconception behaviour <strong>in</strong> women with pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g diabetes<br />
Women with type 1 diabetes<br />
n/N (%)<br />
Women with type 2 diabetes<br />
n/N (%)<br />
p-value<br />
Planned <strong>pregnancy</strong> 72/121 (60) 52/84 (62) 0.73<br />
Evidence of contraceptive use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 12<br />
months prior to <strong>pregnancy</strong> 61/104 (59) 21/65 (32) 0.001<br />
Evidence of preconception folic acid 54/110 (49) 32/71 (45) 0.60<br />
Smok<strong>in</strong>g 41/150 (27) 22/108 (20) 0.20<br />
Assessment of suboptimal approach of<br />
<strong>the</strong> woman to manag<strong>in</strong>g her diabetes<br />
83/135 (61) 51/88 (60) 0.60<br />
before <strong>pregnancy</strong><br />
Assessment of suboptimal approach of<br />
<strong>the</strong> woman to manag<strong>in</strong>g her diabetes<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong><br />
50/171 (29) 36/124 (29) 0.97<br />
75