25.10.2014 Views

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11.4 Preconception behaviour<br />

The CEMACH report on 3808 pregnancies <strong>in</strong> women with pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g diabetes found a poor level of<br />

<strong>pregnancy</strong> preparation, which was more marked for women with type 2 diabetes. 2 The enquiry module<br />

provided <strong>the</strong> opportunity to exam<strong>in</strong>e differences <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r aspects of preconception behaviour.<br />

11.4.1 Planned <strong>pregnancy</strong> and contraceptive use<br />

Planned <strong>pregnancy</strong> rates <strong>we</strong>re similar for women with type 1 diabetes (60% of 121 women) and type 2<br />

diabetes (62% of 84 women) (p=0.73, table 11.5), comp<strong>are</strong>d to a planned <strong>pregnancy</strong> rate of 58% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

UK <strong>in</strong> 2001-2002. 6 Ho<strong>we</strong>ver, fe<strong>we</strong>r women with type 2 diabetes had evidence of contraceptive use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

12 months prior to <strong>pregnancy</strong> (p=0.001, table 11.5). This suggests that for women with type 2 diabetes,<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g a <strong>pregnancy</strong> does not necessarily equate to <strong>the</strong> use of contraception when not actively try<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

conceive. This may be l<strong>in</strong>ked to cultural beliefs and attitudes, and health professionals need to explore<br />

<strong>the</strong>se issues dur<strong>in</strong>g annual diabetes reviews and pre-<strong>pregnancy</strong> counsell<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

11.4.2 Folic acid<br />

In <strong>the</strong> 2005 CEMACH report, 39% of all women <strong>we</strong>re documented <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> maternity notes or medical<br />

professional correspondence to have commenced folic acid before <strong>pregnancy</strong>, with fe<strong>we</strong>r women with<br />

type 2 diabetes documented to have started folic acid <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preconception period. 2 For <strong>the</strong> enquiry<br />

module, general practitioners and <strong>the</strong> adult diabetes service <strong>we</strong>re asked to provide <strong>in</strong>formation on folic<br />

acid use before <strong>pregnancy</strong>. A higher rate of preconception folic acid use than for <strong>the</strong> full cohort was<br />

reported (49% of women with type 1 diabetes and 45% of women with type 2 diabetes), and <strong>the</strong>re was<br />

no observed difference bet<strong>we</strong>en folic acid use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> two groups of women (p=0.60, Table 11.5).<br />

The difference <strong>in</strong> fi nd<strong>in</strong>gs bet<strong>we</strong>en <strong>the</strong> descriptive study and <strong>the</strong> enquiry may be due to <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>formation on folic acid <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> descriptive study was dependent on documentation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> maternity notes,<br />

whereas <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> enquiry, adult diabetes services and general practitioners <strong>we</strong>re approached for <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

It is also possible that health professionals <strong>we</strong>re less likely to document folic acid use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> maternity<br />

notes or general medical records for women with type 2 diabetes than for women with type 1 diabetes,<br />

perhaps due to issues such as language diffi culties.<br />

Table 11.5<br />

Preconception behaviour <strong>in</strong> women with pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g diabetes<br />

Women with type 1 diabetes<br />

n/N (%)<br />

Women with type 2 diabetes<br />

n/N (%)<br />

p-value<br />

Planned <strong>pregnancy</strong> 72/121 (60) 52/84 (62) 0.73<br />

Evidence of contraceptive use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 12<br />

months prior to <strong>pregnancy</strong> 61/104 (59) 21/65 (32) 0.001<br />

Evidence of preconception folic acid 54/110 (49) 32/71 (45) 0.60<br />

Smok<strong>in</strong>g 41/150 (27) 22/108 (20) 0.20<br />

Assessment of suboptimal approach of<br />

<strong>the</strong> woman to manag<strong>in</strong>g her diabetes<br />

83/135 (61) 51/88 (60) 0.60<br />

before <strong>pregnancy</strong><br />

Assessment of suboptimal approach of<br />

<strong>the</strong> woman to manag<strong>in</strong>g her diabetes<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong><br />

50/171 (29) 36/124 (29) 0.97<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!