25.10.2014 Views

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11. A comparison of type 1 and type 2 diabetes<br />

Learn<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

• Women with type 2 diabetes <strong>in</strong> <strong>pregnancy</strong> <strong>we</strong>re more likely to be obese comp<strong>are</strong>d to women<br />

with type 1 diabetes.<br />

• Planned <strong>pregnancy</strong> rates <strong>we</strong>re similar for women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes but women<br />

with type 2 diabetes <strong>we</strong>re less likely to have evidence of contraceptive use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 12 months<br />

before <strong>pregnancy</strong>.<br />

• Women with type 2 diabetes <strong>we</strong>re less likely than women with type 1 diabetes to have had<br />

a ret<strong>in</strong>al assessment or test for album<strong>in</strong>uria <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 12 months before <strong>pregnancy</strong>.<br />

• Women with type 1 diabetes <strong>in</strong> <strong>pregnancy</strong> <strong>we</strong>re more likely to have ret<strong>in</strong>opathy, recurrent<br />

hypoglycaemia and severe hypoglycaemic episodes than women with type 2 diabetes.<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less, a fi fth of women with type 2 diabetes had recurrent hypoglycaemia and<br />

5% had new ret<strong>in</strong>opathy <strong>in</strong> <strong>pregnancy</strong>.<br />

• Women with type 2 diabetes <strong>we</strong>re less likely than women with type 1 diabetes to have<br />

a ret<strong>in</strong>al assessment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fi rst trimester of <strong>pregnancy</strong> and less likely to receive postnatal<br />

contraceptive advice.<br />

11.1 Introduction<br />

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g 1 and <strong>the</strong> CEMACH report on 3808 pregnancies <strong>in</strong> women<br />

with pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g diabetes <strong>in</strong> England, Wales and Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Ireland found that more than a quarter (27%)<br />

of women with pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g diabetes had type 2 diabetes. 2 Women with type 2 diabetes <strong>we</strong>re a very<br />

different group to women with type 1 diabetes be<strong>in</strong>g more likely to be older, multiparous, from a Black,<br />

Asian and O<strong>the</strong>r ethnic m<strong>in</strong>ority group and resident <strong>in</strong> an <strong>are</strong>a of social deprivation. 2 Women with<br />

type 2 diabetes <strong>we</strong>re also less likely to have had pre-<strong>pregnancy</strong> counsell<strong>in</strong>g, preconception folic acid<br />

and a test of glycaemic control <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 6 months before <strong>pregnancy</strong>. 2<br />

The enquiry module of <strong>the</strong> CEMACH <strong>Diabetes</strong> programme <strong>the</strong>refore set out to provide additional<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>the</strong> differences bet<strong>we</strong>en women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, <strong>in</strong> terms of cl<strong>in</strong>ical<br />

characteristics, social and lifestyle issues, and <strong>the</strong> c<strong>are</strong> provided to women.<br />

11.2 Methodology<br />

All women selected for <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> enquiry as <strong>the</strong> control group (n=220) <strong>we</strong>re <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> analyses for this<br />

chapter. In addition, 79 extra type 2 diabetic pregnancies result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a good outcome <strong>we</strong>re also <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />

(see Chapter 4). This gave a total of 170 women with type 1 diabetes and 127 women with type 2 diabetes,<br />

which represented 7.2% and 14.4% of all women with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes respectively<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g a good <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> full descriptive study population of 3808 pregnancies. In order<br />

to analyse a representative sample of women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes from <strong>the</strong> descriptive study,<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!