25.10.2014 Views

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cl<strong>in</strong>ical governance<br />

10.5 Maternity unit guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />

CNST emphasises <strong>the</strong> importance of evidence-based, referenced, multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary guidel<strong>in</strong>es which <strong>are</strong><br />

easily accessible to <strong>the</strong> health professionals provid<strong>in</strong>g c<strong>are</strong>. 4 For each woman <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> enquiry, panels <strong>we</strong>re<br />

asked to review <strong>the</strong> local maternity unit’s diabetes guidel<strong>in</strong>e (contemporaneous for 2002-2003) when <strong>the</strong>se<br />

had been provided by <strong>the</strong> unit. An <strong>in</strong>dividual unit’s guidel<strong>in</strong>e may have been revie<strong>we</strong>d more than once by<br />

panels, and <strong>the</strong> results <strong>are</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore presented as <strong>the</strong> proportion of women to whom any concerns related.<br />

Enquiry panels had concerns about local maternity units’ diabetes guidel<strong>in</strong>es for nearly three quarters<br />

(72%) of 386 women where unit guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>we</strong>re available.<br />

10.5.1 Panel comments on maternity unit diabetes guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Panels made 386 comments about <strong>the</strong> local diabetes guidel<strong>in</strong>es for 278 women. The two most frequent<br />

issues cited <strong>we</strong>re no antenatal guidel<strong>in</strong>es and lack of clarity or <strong>in</strong>suffi cient detail (table 10.2). For nearly a<br />

quarter of <strong>the</strong> women, <strong>the</strong> panels’ view was that <strong>in</strong>travenous <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> regimes for labour <strong>we</strong>re <strong>in</strong>adequate,<br />

and for approximately a fi fth of <strong>the</strong> women <strong>the</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>e did not <strong>in</strong>clude blood glucose targets. There was<br />

considered to be wrong or <strong>in</strong>appropriate advice <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>es for more than a tenth of women assessed<br />

to have suboptimal local guidel<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

Table 10.2<br />

Panel comments on suboptimal maternity unit diabetes guidel<strong>in</strong>es (table conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>formation follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

categorisation of free text)<br />

Number of women with suboptimal local<br />

guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />

(N=278)<br />

No. of comments<br />

% of women<br />

Total comments* 386 -<br />

No antenatal guidel<strong>in</strong>e 80 29<br />

Not enough detail/not clear 70 25<br />

Inadequate <strong>in</strong>travenous <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> regime for labour 64 23<br />

Blood glucose issues (ma<strong>in</strong>ly no targets set) 57 21<br />

Wrong/<strong>in</strong>appropriate advice <strong>in</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>e 35 13<br />

No postnatal guidel<strong>in</strong>e 24 9<br />

Out of date 19 7<br />

No guidance on management dur<strong>in</strong>g antenatal<br />

steroid adm<strong>in</strong>istration 16 6<br />

No advice on screen<strong>in</strong>g or management<br />

of diabetes complications 9 3<br />

Not referenced 6 2<br />

Recommends rout<strong>in</strong>e admission of baby to neonatal unit 6 2<br />

* hospital protocols not available or data miss<strong>in</strong>g for 56 women.<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!