Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Cl<strong>in</strong>ical governance<br />
10.5 Maternity unit guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />
CNST emphasises <strong>the</strong> importance of evidence-based, referenced, multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary guidel<strong>in</strong>es which <strong>are</strong><br />
easily accessible to <strong>the</strong> health professionals provid<strong>in</strong>g c<strong>are</strong>. 4 For each woman <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> enquiry, panels <strong>we</strong>re<br />
asked to review <strong>the</strong> local maternity unit’s diabetes guidel<strong>in</strong>e (contemporaneous for 2002-2003) when <strong>the</strong>se<br />
had been provided by <strong>the</strong> unit. An <strong>in</strong>dividual unit’s guidel<strong>in</strong>e may have been revie<strong>we</strong>d more than once by<br />
panels, and <strong>the</strong> results <strong>are</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore presented as <strong>the</strong> proportion of women to whom any concerns related.<br />
Enquiry panels had concerns about local maternity units’ diabetes guidel<strong>in</strong>es for nearly three quarters<br />
(72%) of 386 women where unit guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>we</strong>re available.<br />
10.5.1 Panel comments on maternity unit diabetes guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Panels made 386 comments about <strong>the</strong> local diabetes guidel<strong>in</strong>es for 278 women. The two most frequent<br />
issues cited <strong>we</strong>re no antenatal guidel<strong>in</strong>es and lack of clarity or <strong>in</strong>suffi cient detail (table 10.2). For nearly a<br />
quarter of <strong>the</strong> women, <strong>the</strong> panels’ view was that <strong>in</strong>travenous <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> regimes for labour <strong>we</strong>re <strong>in</strong>adequate,<br />
and for approximately a fi fth of <strong>the</strong> women <strong>the</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>e did not <strong>in</strong>clude blood glucose targets. There was<br />
considered to be wrong or <strong>in</strong>appropriate advice <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>es for more than a tenth of women assessed<br />
to have suboptimal local guidel<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Table 10.2<br />
Panel comments on suboptimal maternity unit diabetes guidel<strong>in</strong>es (table conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>formation follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
categorisation of free text)<br />
Number of women with suboptimal local<br />
guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />
(N=278)<br />
No. of comments<br />
% of women<br />
Total comments* 386 -<br />
No antenatal guidel<strong>in</strong>e 80 29<br />
Not enough detail/not clear 70 25<br />
Inadequate <strong>in</strong>travenous <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> regime for labour 64 23<br />
Blood glucose issues (ma<strong>in</strong>ly no targets set) 57 21<br />
Wrong/<strong>in</strong>appropriate advice <strong>in</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>e 35 13<br />
No postnatal guidel<strong>in</strong>e 24 9<br />
Out of date 19 7<br />
No guidance on management dur<strong>in</strong>g antenatal<br />
steroid adm<strong>in</strong>istration 16 6<br />
No advice on screen<strong>in</strong>g or management<br />
of diabetes complications 9 3<br />
Not referenced 6 2<br />
Recommends rout<strong>in</strong>e admission of baby to neonatal unit 6 2<br />
* hospital protocols not available or data miss<strong>in</strong>g for 56 women.<br />
66