25.10.2014 Views

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cl<strong>in</strong>ical c<strong>are</strong> issues: <strong>pregnancy</strong><br />

Ho<strong>we</strong>ver, <strong>the</strong>re <strong>we</strong>re a number of concerns about cl<strong>in</strong>ical c<strong>are</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong>. Nearly half of women<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> enquiry did not have a ret<strong>in</strong>al exam<strong>in</strong>ation dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fi rst trimester and <strong>the</strong>re <strong>we</strong>re concerns about<br />

failure to change <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> regimes to achieve good glycaemic control, and a non-responsive local strategy<br />

of diabetes antenatal c<strong>are</strong>. A tenth of women did not have any additional <strong>in</strong>terventions to ensure good<br />

glycaemic control dur<strong>in</strong>g antenatal steroid adm<strong>in</strong>istration. Fetal surveillance was suboptimal for nearly half<br />

of babies with antenatal evidence of macrosomia, and this was associated with poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome,<br />

specifi cally fetal or neonatal death from 20 <strong>we</strong>eks gestation (see Chapter 6 and Appendices C, D and E).<br />

It is disappo<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g that women who had a poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome <strong>we</strong>re more likely to have suboptimal<br />

diabetes c<strong>are</strong> after delivery and <strong>we</strong>re less likely to receive contraceptive advice prior to discharge<br />

from hospital. It is recognised that cl<strong>in</strong>icians <strong>are</strong> likely to need to provide more <strong>in</strong>tensive counsell<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

women who have had a fetal loss, stillbirth or a baby born with a congenital anomaly, and discussion<br />

about contraception <strong>in</strong> this situation can be diffi cult. Ho<strong>we</strong>ver, it is important that diabetes c<strong>are</strong> is not<br />

compromised for <strong>the</strong>se women, and discussion about future <strong>pregnancy</strong> preparation may help to m<strong>in</strong>imise<br />

<strong>the</strong> risk of adverse <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> future.<br />

Some quotes from <strong>the</strong> panel discussions<br />

Suboptimal glycaemic control dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong>:<br />

• 'HbA1C 10.7% - should have been put on <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>.'<br />

• 'At 36 <strong>we</strong>eks HbA1c 8.6%. Insul<strong>in</strong> was changed to QDS at 28 <strong>we</strong>eks this should have<br />

been sooner.'<br />

• 'Fragmented C<strong>are</strong>, locum consultants. No notes from Diabetologist.'<br />

Suboptimal glycaemic control dur<strong>in</strong>g labour and delivery:<br />

• 'Slid<strong>in</strong>g scale not commenced until <strong>we</strong>ll established <strong>in</strong> labour and blood glucose high. Fixed<br />

slid<strong>in</strong>g scale that did not adequately ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> blood glucose at acceptable levels.'<br />

• 'The pump became disconnected, <strong>the</strong> 3 way tap was turned off. No one noticed for some time<br />

until her BMs <strong>we</strong>nt up considerably.'<br />

<strong>Diabetes</strong> c<strong>are</strong> (exclud<strong>in</strong>g glycaemic control):<br />

• ‘Inadequate nephropathy monitor<strong>in</strong>g - no regular ur<strong>in</strong>e test<strong>in</strong>g, only 2 dipstick ur<strong>in</strong>e tests.<br />

No ret<strong>in</strong>al screen<strong>in</strong>g after 13 <strong>we</strong>eks.’<br />

• ‘Lack of evidence of holistic c<strong>are</strong>, seemed to be outside multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary service, no <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

about diabetes nurse specialist, dietetic or community team’s <strong>in</strong>put, no jo<strong>in</strong>t cl<strong>in</strong>ic.’<br />

Antenatal fetal surveillance:<br />

• ‘Noted <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> abdom<strong>in</strong>al circumference with previous history of IUD and <strong>the</strong> next scan<br />

is arranged for 4 <strong>we</strong>eks. There should have been <strong>in</strong>creased surveillance.’<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!