Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Cl<strong>in</strong>ical c<strong>are</strong> issues: <strong>pregnancy</strong><br />
Table 9.3<br />
Panel comments on suboptimal diabetes c<strong>are</strong> (exclud<strong>in</strong>g glycaemic control) <strong>in</strong> <strong>pregnancy</strong> (table conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g categorisation of free text)<br />
Women assessed to have suboptimal diabetes c<strong>are</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>pregnancy</strong><br />
Good <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome<br />
n=118<br />
Poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome<br />
n=146<br />
No. of comments % of women No. of comments % of women<br />
Total comments* 174 - 224 -<br />
Suboptimal cl<strong>in</strong>ical practice 159 196<br />
Lack of /suboptimal ret<strong>in</strong>al screen<strong>in</strong>g/<br />
management 72 61 71 49<br />
Suboptimal renal function monitor<strong>in</strong>g/<br />
management 38 32 49 34<br />
Lack of multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>in</strong>volvement 25 21 31 21<br />
Lack of senior <strong>in</strong>put 2 2 7 5<br />
Poor management of glycaemic control<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g steroid adm<strong>in</strong>istration 1 1 1 1<br />
Suboptimal management of<br />
pre-<strong>pregnancy</strong> medication 0 0 2 1<br />
Suboptimal management of o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
complications e.g. prote<strong>in</strong>uria +/-BP,<br />
6 5 12 8<br />
ketonuria<br />
Infrequent cl<strong>in</strong>ic appo<strong>in</strong>tments 2 2 9 6<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r 13 11 14 10<br />
Communication issues 5 4 9 6<br />
Patient factors 10 8 19 13<br />
* 34 comments <strong>we</strong>re about social and lifestyle issues.<br />
9.5 Antenatal fetal surveillance<br />
C<strong>are</strong>ful fetal surveillance is important <strong>in</strong> diabetic <strong>pregnancy</strong>, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g serial ultrasound scans for fetal<br />
growth dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> third trimester and consideration of cardiotocograph monitor<strong>in</strong>g from 36 <strong>we</strong>eks. 7 Enquiry<br />
panels assessed that fetal surveillance was suboptimal for 20% of 37 babies with antenatal evidence of<br />
fetal growth restriction and for 45% of 129 babies with antenatal evidence of macrosomia (defi ned for<br />
panel enquiries as fetal size >90th centile). For babies with antenatal evidence of macrosomia, suboptimal<br />
fetal surveillance was associated with poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome (OR 5.3, 95% CI 2.4 -12.0, adjusted for<br />
maternal age and deprivation, see Chapter 6). Additional case-control analysis (see Appendices C, D<br />
and E) sho<strong>we</strong>d an association with fetal or neonatal death after 20 <strong>we</strong>eks gestation and not with fetal<br />
congenital anomaly.<br />
54