25.10.2014 Views

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9. Cl<strong>in</strong>ical c<strong>are</strong> issues: <strong>pregnancy</strong><br />

Learn<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

• Suboptimal glycaemic control dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong> was associated with poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical issues identifi ed <strong>we</strong>re failure to change <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> regimes to achieve good<br />

glycaemic control, and a non-responsive local strategy of diabetes antenatal c<strong>are</strong>.<br />

• Suboptimal maternity c<strong>are</strong> and diabetes c<strong>are</strong> (exclud<strong>in</strong>g glycaemic control) dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong><br />

was associated with poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome. Underly<strong>in</strong>g issues <strong>in</strong>cluded suboptimal fetal and<br />

maternal surveillance and suboptimal monitor<strong>in</strong>g of diabetes complications.<br />

• For babies with antenatal evidence of macrosomia, suboptimal antenatal fetal surveillance was<br />

associated with poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome, with <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> issues be<strong>in</strong>g lack of timely follow up and<br />

poor <strong>in</strong>terpretation of ultrasound scans.<br />

• Women who had a poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome <strong>we</strong>re more likely not to receive postnatal<br />

contraceptive advice and more likely to have suboptimal postnatal diabetes c<strong>are</strong>.<br />

9.1 Introduction<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong>, <strong>the</strong>re <strong>are</strong> often rapid changes <strong>in</strong> glycaemic control due to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> resistance.<br />

Suboptimal glycaemic control has been associated with fetal congenital anomaly, 1 an <strong>in</strong>creased risk of<br />

miscarriage 2 and fetal macrosomia; 3 and <strong>the</strong>re may also be placental <strong>in</strong>sufficiency (particularly associated<br />

with nephropathy) result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> fetal growth restriction. Women <strong>the</strong>mselves may have complications<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g hypoglycaemia, ret<strong>in</strong>opathy, nephropathy, diabetic ketoacidosis and pre-eclampsia. Cl<strong>in</strong>icians and<br />

health services have an important role <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g relationships with women before and dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong>,<br />

empo<strong>we</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m to manage <strong>the</strong>ir diabetes, and provid<strong>in</strong>g effective maternal and fetal surveillance.<br />

9.2 Glycaemic control dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong>, labour and delivery<br />

Tight glycaemic control dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong> is one of <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of management for women with<br />

pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g diabetes. Dur<strong>in</strong>g labour and delivery, good glycaemic control should be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed to reduce<br />

<strong>the</strong> risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia. 4<br />

The 2005 CEMACH report 5 on pregnant women with pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g diabetes found that although<br />

approximately three quarters of 2732 women had a glycosylated haemoglob<strong>in</strong> test (HbA1c) performed<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fi rst trimester of <strong>pregnancy</strong>, just over a third of <strong>the</strong>se women achieved an HbA1c value less<br />

than 7%. This improved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second and third trimesters, with two thirds of women with an HbA1c test<br />

achiev<strong>in</strong>g a result less than 7%.<br />

9.2.1 Enquiry fi nd<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Enquiry panels assessed that <strong>the</strong> majority of women <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> enquiry had suboptimal glycaemic control<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong> (84% of 204 cases and 61% of 192 controls <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fi rst trimester; 71% of 205 cases and<br />

37% of 209 controls after <strong>the</strong> fi rst trimester). Suboptimal glycaemic control at any time dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong><br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!