Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Cl<strong>in</strong>ical c<strong>are</strong> issues: preconception<br />
Table 8.3<br />
Panel comments about cl<strong>in</strong>ical c<strong>are</strong> issues related to suboptimal preconception glycaemic control (table conta<strong>in</strong>s<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation follow<strong>in</strong>g categorisation of free text)<br />
Women assessed to have suboptimal<br />
preconception glycaemic control<br />
Good <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome<br />
(N=115)<br />
Poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome<br />
(N=165)<br />
No. of comments % of women No. of comments % of women<br />
Total comments* † 20 28<br />
Suboptimal cl<strong>in</strong>ical practice 15 13 11 7<br />
Suboptimal communication 5 4 16 10<br />
Miscellaneous 0 0 1 1<br />
* There <strong>we</strong>re 81 comments where <strong>the</strong> issues <strong>we</strong>re not described by panels and 18 comments where <strong>the</strong>re was a lack of<br />
preconception c<strong>are</strong> with <strong>the</strong> reason be<strong>in</strong>g unclear to panels; <strong>the</strong>se comments <strong>are</strong> not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this table.<br />
† 187 comments <strong>we</strong>re made on social and lifestyle issues; <strong>the</strong>se <strong>are</strong> described <strong>in</strong> Chapter 7.<br />
8.8 Conclusions<br />
Prior to <strong>pregnancy</strong>, cl<strong>in</strong>ical support and <strong>in</strong>formation for women appe<strong>are</strong>d to be poor:<br />
• Just over half of women had a ret<strong>in</strong>al exam<strong>in</strong>ation and a renal function test <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 12 months before<br />
<strong>pregnancy</strong>.<br />
• Only a quarter of women had evidence of glycaemic control targets be<strong>in</strong>g set and just over half<br />
had documented evidence of a discussion about glycaemic control <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 12 months prior to<br />
<strong>pregnancy</strong>.<br />
• Less than half of women had documented evidence that diet, contraception, or diabetes<br />
complications had been discussed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 12 months before <strong>pregnancy</strong>.<br />
• Less than half of women <strong>we</strong>re documented to be <strong>in</strong>formed about fetal risks, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased chance<br />
of <strong>in</strong>duction of labour and <strong>the</strong> possibility of caes<strong>are</strong>an delivery.<br />
• Documentation of pre-<strong>pregnancy</strong> counsell<strong>in</strong>g was poor.<br />
Enquiry panels found that health professionals often missed <strong>the</strong> opportunity to provide pre-<strong>pregnancy</strong><br />
counsell<strong>in</strong>g, and did not appear to advise about or prescribe folic acid or contraception before <strong>pregnancy</strong>.<br />
There <strong>we</strong>re also concerns about a lack of timely <strong>in</strong>put by <strong>the</strong> diabetes team and whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> regimes <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> preconception period <strong>we</strong>re appropriate to achieve tight glycaemic control.<br />
These fi nd<strong>in</strong>gs suggest that <strong>the</strong> majority of women with diabetes <strong>are</strong> not hav<strong>in</strong>g effective annual diabetes<br />
reviews, and that <strong>the</strong> maternity component of preconception c<strong>are</strong> (contraception, folic acid, <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
about <strong>the</strong> impact of diabetes on <strong>pregnancy</strong>) is miss<strong>in</strong>g for many women.<br />
46