25.10.2014 Views

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Factors associated with poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome<br />

<strong>in</strong> women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes<br />

Table 6.6<br />

Association of diabetes c<strong>are</strong> factors (exclud<strong>in</strong>g glycaemic control) <strong>in</strong> women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes,<br />

with poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome<br />

<strong>Diabetes</strong> c<strong>are</strong> factor<br />

Cases<br />

n/N (%)<br />

Controls<br />

n/N (%)<br />

Crude OR<br />

[95% CI]<br />

Adjusted OR a<br />

[95% CI]<br />

No ret<strong>in</strong>al assessment dur<strong>in</strong>g fi rst trimester<br />

or at book<strong>in</strong>g if later 70/194 (36) 49/183 (27) 1.5 [1.0, 2.4] 1.4 [0.9, 2.2]<br />

No referral to ophthalmologist<br />

(if ret<strong>in</strong>opathy present) 10/45 (22) 21/44 (48) 0.3 [0.1, 0.8] 0.2 [0.1, 0.7]<br />

No monitor<strong>in</strong>g for nephropathy 46/209 (22) 26/206 (13) 2.0 [1.2, 3.3] 1.9 [1.1, 3.3]<br />

No test of renal function<br />

(if nephropathy present) 12/26 (46) 5/14 (36) 1.5 [0.4, 6.0] 1.9 [0.3, 6.0]<br />

Assessment of suboptimal diabetes<br />

c<strong>are</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong> 146/204 (72) 118/204 (58) 1.8 [1.2, 2.8] 1.7 [1.1, 2.6]<br />

a<br />

adjusted for maternal age and deprivation.<br />

6.3.7 Maternity c<strong>are</strong><br />

The association of maternity c<strong>are</strong> factors with poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome <strong>are</strong> shown <strong>in</strong> table 6.7. It is of<br />

concern that suboptimal maternity c<strong>are</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong> and suboptimal antenatal fetal surveillance of big<br />

babies <strong>we</strong>re associated with poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome. This, toge<strong>the</strong>r with issues relat<strong>in</strong>g to discussion of<br />

mode and tim<strong>in</strong>g of delivery, <strong>are</strong> discussed fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> Chapter 9.<br />

Table 6.7<br />

Association of maternity c<strong>are</strong> factors <strong>in</strong> women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes with poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome<br />

Maternity c<strong>are</strong> factor<br />

Cases<br />

n/N (%)<br />

Controls<br />

n/N (%)<br />

Crude OR<br />

[95% CI]<br />

Adjusted OR<br />

[95% CI]<br />

Assessment of suboptimal fetal<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g (with antenatal evidence<br />

6/24 (25) 1/11 (9) 3.3 [0.3, 34.1] 2.3 [0.2, 26.3]<br />

of growth restricted baby)<br />

Assessment of suboptimal fetal<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g (with antenatal evidence<br />

35/52 (67) 27/73 (37) 3.5 [1.7, 7.4] 5.3 [2.4, 12.0]<br />

of fetal size > 90th centile)<br />

No discussion of mode and tim<strong>in</strong>g of delivery 15/178 (8) 4/202 (2) 4.6 [1.5, 14.2] 4.0 [1.2, 12.7]<br />

No adm<strong>in</strong>istration of antenatal corticosteroids b 14/41 (34) 12/33 (36) 0.9 [0.4, 2.4] 0.9 [0.3, 2.5]<br />

Assessment of suboptimal maternity<br />

c<strong>are</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> antenatal period 125/215 (58) 95/215 (44) 1.8 [1.2, 2.6] 1.9 [1.2, 2.8]<br />

Assessment of suboptimal maternity<br />

c<strong>are</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g labour and delivery 78/199 (39) 72/213 (34) 1.3 [0.8, 1.9] 1.3 [0.8, 1.9]<br />

a<br />

adjusted for maternal age and deprivation.<br />

b<br />

Analysis restricted to babies deliver<strong>in</strong>g from 24+0 to 35+6 <strong>we</strong>eks gestation and exclud<strong>in</strong>g antepartum stillbirths.<br />

6.3.8 Postnatal c<strong>are</strong><br />

Although postnatal c<strong>are</strong> factors could not have been causative to poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome, women who<br />

had a poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome <strong>we</strong>re more likely to have suboptimal postnatal diabetes c<strong>are</strong> and no<br />

contraceptive advice before discharge from hospital (table 6.8). This is discussed fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> Chapter 9.<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!