Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4. Methodology<br />
4.1 Introduction<br />
The enquiry module of <strong>the</strong> CEMACH diabetes programme encompassed a case-control study,<br />
a comparison of type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and an audit of c<strong>are</strong>:<br />
• A case-control analysis to exam<strong>in</strong>e any differences <strong>in</strong> demographic factors, social and lifestyle<br />
issues, and cl<strong>in</strong>ical c<strong>are</strong> bet<strong>we</strong>en a) pregnancies result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> adverse <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome (deaths<br />
from 20 <strong>we</strong>eks gestation up to 28 days after delivery or major fetal congenital anomaly at any<br />
gestation) and b) pregnancies result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a normally formed baby surviv<strong>in</strong>g to 28 days of life.<br />
• A comparison of any differences <strong>in</strong> demographic factors, social and lifestyle issues, and cl<strong>in</strong>ical<br />
c<strong>are</strong> bet<strong>we</strong>en women with a) type 1 and b) type 2 diabetes.<br />
• An audit of <strong>the</strong> c<strong>are</strong> received before, dur<strong>in</strong>g and after <strong>pregnancy</strong> by a subset of women with<strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> whole study population of <strong>the</strong> CEMACH diabetes programme.<br />
4.2 Selection of pregnancies for enquiry<br />
To enable <strong>the</strong> audit of c<strong>are</strong> and case-control analysis to be conducted, four groups of pregnancies <strong>we</strong>re<br />
selected for enquiry:<br />
1. Anomalies – <strong>pregnancy</strong> to a woman with type 1 or type 2 diabetes result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gleton baby<br />
(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>ations of <strong>pregnancy</strong> at any gestation, late fetal losses, stillbirths and live births)<br />
with a confi rmed major congenital anomaly, diagnosed up to 28 days of life.<br />
2. Deaths – <strong>pregnancy</strong> to a woman with type 1 or type 2 diabetes result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> death of a s<strong>in</strong>gleton baby<br />
from 20 <strong>we</strong>eks of gestation up to 28 days after delivery, exclud<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>ations of <strong>pregnancy</strong> and<br />
confi rmed congenital anomalies.<br />
3. Controls – <strong>pregnancy</strong> to a woman with type 1 or type 2 diabetes result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gleton birth<br />
deliver<strong>in</strong>g at 20 <strong>we</strong>eks of gestation onwards and surviv<strong>in</strong>g to 28 days of life, exclud<strong>in</strong>g those with<br />
a confi rmed congenital anomaly.<br />
Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary fi nd<strong>in</strong>gs from <strong>the</strong> CEMACH descriptive study of 3808 pregnancies to women with diabetes<br />
<strong>in</strong> England, Wales and Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Ireland <strong>in</strong> 2002-03 sho<strong>we</strong>d that women with type 2 diabetes appe<strong>are</strong>d<br />
to be more poorly prep<strong>are</strong>d for <strong>pregnancy</strong> and also had an equivalent risk of adverse <strong>pregnancy</strong><br />
outcome to women with type 1 diabetes. 1,2 It was <strong>the</strong>refore decided to enquire on an additional sample<br />
of pregnancies of women with type 2 diabetes to enable a more thorough <strong>in</strong>vestigation of <strong>the</strong> c<strong>are</strong><br />
received by <strong>the</strong>se women.<br />
4. Additional type 2 sample – <strong>pregnancy</strong> to a woman with type 2 diabetes result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gleton<br />
birth deliver<strong>in</strong>g at 20 <strong>we</strong>eks of gestation onwards and surviv<strong>in</strong>g to 28 days of life, exclud<strong>in</strong>g those<br />
with a confi rmed congenital anomaly.<br />
All pregnancies meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> defi nition of anomaly or death with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CEMACH descriptive study <strong>we</strong>re<br />
selected to form <strong>the</strong> cases for <strong>the</strong> case-control analysis. Controls <strong>we</strong>re randomly sampled from <strong>the</strong><br />
group of pregnancies reported <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CEMACH descriptive study fi tt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> defi nition of a control <strong>in</strong><br />
order to sample one control per case. The additional type 2 pregnancies <strong>we</strong>re randomly sampled from<br />
10