25.10.2014 Views

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Key fi nd<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> CEMACH <strong>Diabetes</strong> Programme<br />

2.4 Preconception c<strong>are</strong><br />

In <strong>the</strong> CEMACH survey of maternity services, less than a fi fth of maternity units <strong>in</strong> England, Wales and<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Ireland provided structured multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary preconception c<strong>are</strong> for women with diabetes. 5<br />

Women with diabetes <strong>we</strong>re poorly prep<strong>are</strong>d for <strong>pregnancy</strong>:<br />

• Less than half <strong>we</strong>re recorded to take folic acid supplements prior to <strong>pregnancy</strong><br />

• Less than half <strong>we</strong>re recorded to have had preconception counsell<strong>in</strong>g regard<strong>in</strong>g glycaemic control,<br />

diet, contraception, diabetes complications and alcohol <strong>in</strong>take<br />

• A third <strong>we</strong>re recorded to have a test of glycaemic control <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 6 months before <strong>pregnancy</strong> 1<br />

• Two-thirds had evidence of suboptimal glycaemic control before conception and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fi rst<br />

trimester of <strong>pregnancy</strong>.<br />

Suboptimal preconception c<strong>are</strong>, glycaemic control before and dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong> and approach of <strong>the</strong><br />

woman to manag<strong>in</strong>g her diabetes <strong>we</strong>re all associated with poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome.<br />

One of <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> underly<strong>in</strong>g factors to suboptimal preconception c<strong>are</strong> was failure of provision of appropriate<br />

c<strong>are</strong> by health professionals: preconception counsell<strong>in</strong>g, contraceptive advice, provision of high dose folic<br />

acid, and appropriate screen<strong>in</strong>g and management of diabetes complications.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> factors underly<strong>in</strong>g suboptimal glycaemic control and a suboptimal approach to manag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

diabetes <strong>we</strong>re social and lifestyle issues: non-attendance of women at planned appo<strong>in</strong>tments, nonadherence<br />

to medical advice about diabetes management, unplanned <strong>pregnancy</strong> and social factors<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g language diffi culties, diffi cult domestic circumstances and erratic or busy lifestyles.<br />

Only a m<strong>in</strong>ority of women <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> enquiry appe<strong>are</strong>d to be us<strong>in</strong>g any form of contraception <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 12 months<br />

before <strong>pregnancy</strong>, based on documentation by adult diabetes services and primary c<strong>are</strong>. This suggests<br />

that women <strong>are</strong> not aw<strong>are</strong> of <strong>the</strong> importance of cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g effective contraception until <strong>the</strong>ir glycaemic<br />

control is as near-normal as possible.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> enquiry, a m<strong>in</strong>ority of women <strong>we</strong>re documented to be on high dose (5mg) folic acid<br />

before <strong>pregnancy</strong>.<br />

There was poor documentation of preconception c<strong>are</strong> and advice given.<br />

2.5 Cl<strong>in</strong>ical c<strong>are</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong><br />

Suboptimal maternity c<strong>are</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong> was associated with poor <strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome. Underly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

issues identifi ed <strong>in</strong>cluded suboptimal fetal surveillance (both cardiotocograph and ultrasound monitor<strong>in</strong>g)<br />

and poor management of maternal risks identifi ed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> course of <strong>pregnancy</strong>.<br />

Suboptimal diabetes c<strong>are</strong> (exclud<strong>in</strong>g glycaemic control) dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong> was associated with poor<br />

<strong>pregnancy</strong> outcome.<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!