Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Association bet<strong>we</strong>en diabetes c<strong>are</strong> factors of fetal and neonatal deaths (exclud<strong>in</strong>g major fetal congenital anomaly)<br />
from 20 <strong>we</strong>eks gestation <strong>in</strong> babies of women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes<br />
<strong>Diabetes</strong> c<strong>are</strong> factor<br />
No referral to ophthalmologist<br />
(if ret<strong>in</strong>opathy present)<br />
No monitor<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
nephropathy<br />
No test of renal function (if<br />
nephropathy present)<br />
Assessment of suboptimal<br />
diabetes c<strong>are</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>pregnancy</strong><br />
a<br />
Adjusted for maternal age and deprivation.<br />
Cases<br />
n/N (%)<br />
Controls<br />
n/N (%)<br />
Crude OR [95% CI]<br />
Adjusted OR a<br />
27/83 (33) 49/183 (27) 1.3 [0.8, 2.3] 1.2 [0.7, 2.2]<br />
6/16 (38) 21/44 (48) 0.7 [0.2, 2.2] 0.6 [0.2, 2.3]<br />
19/91 (21) 26/206 (13) 1.8 [1.0, 3.5] 1.8 [0.9, 3.5]<br />
8/14 (58) 5/14 (36) 2.4 [0.5, 11.7] 2.9 [0.5, 15.8]<br />
67/91 (74) 112/204 (55) 2.3 [1.3, 4.0] 2.2 [1.3, 3.9]<br />
Association bet<strong>we</strong>en maternity c<strong>are</strong> factors of fetal and neonatal deaths (exclud<strong>in</strong>g major fetal congenital anomaly)<br />
from 20 <strong>we</strong>eks gestation <strong>in</strong> babies of women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes<br />
Maternity c<strong>are</strong> factor<br />
Assessment of suboptimal<br />
fetal monitor<strong>in</strong>g (with<br />
antenatal evidence of<br />
growth restricted baby)<br />
Assessment of suboptimal<br />
fetal monitor<strong>in</strong>g (with<br />
antenatal evidence of fetal<br />
size >90th centile)<br />
Cases<br />
n/N (%)<br />
Controls<br />
n/N (%)<br />
Crude OR<br />
[95% CI]<br />
Adjusted OR a<br />
5/11 (45) 1/11 (9) 8.3 [0.6, 119.3] 5.2 [0.4, 62.8]<br />
28/32 (88) 27/73 (37) 15.2 [3.9, 59.2] 17.7 [5.4, 57.6]<br />
No discussion of mode and<br />
tim<strong>in</strong>g of delivery<br />
9/79 (12) 4/202 (2) 6.7 [1.9, 23.0] 5.9 [1.7, 20.7]<br />
No adm<strong>in</strong>istration of<br />
antenatal corticosteroids b 2/7 (29) 12/33 (36) 0.7 [0.1, 4.3] 0.4 [0.0, 4.1]<br />
Assessment of suboptimal<br />
maternity c<strong>are</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 68/90 (76) 95/215 (44) 3.9 [2.2, 7.0] 4.2 [2.3, 7.4]<br />
antenatal period<br />
Assessment of suboptimal<br />
maternity c<strong>are</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g labour<br />
and delivery<br />
34/88 (39) 72/213 (34) 1.2 [0.7, 2.1] 1.2 [0.7, 2.1]<br />
a<br />
Adjusted for maternal age and deprivation.<br />
b<br />
Analysis restricted to babies deliver<strong>in</strong>g from 24+0 to 35+6 <strong>we</strong>eks gestation and exclud<strong>in</strong>g antepartum stillbirths.<br />
133