25.10.2014 Views

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix D<br />

Association of diabetes c<strong>are</strong> factors with fetal and neonatal death from 20 <strong>we</strong>eks gestation <strong>in</strong> babies of women with<br />

type 1 and type 2 diabetes<br />

<strong>Diabetes</strong> c<strong>are</strong> factor<br />

Cases<br />

n/N (%)<br />

Controls<br />

n/N (%)<br />

Crude OR<br />

[95% CI]<br />

Adjusted OR a<br />

No ret<strong>in</strong>al assessment dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

1st trimester or at book<strong>in</strong>g if 43/120 (36) 49/183 (27) 1.5 [0.9, 2.5] 1.4 [0.8, 2.3]<br />

later<br />

No referral to ophthalmologist<br />

(if ret<strong>in</strong>opathy present)<br />

9/26 (35) 21/44 (48) 0.6 [0.2, 1.6] 0.4 [0.1, 1.3]<br />

No monitor<strong>in</strong>g for nephropathy 27/130 (21) 26/206 (13) 1.8 [1.0, 3.3] 1.8 [1.0, 3.2]<br />

No test of renal function (if<br />

nephropathy present)<br />

9/16 (56) 5/14 (36) 2.3 [0.5, 10.7] 2.7 [0.5, 13.8]<br />

Assessment of suboptimal<br />

diabetes c<strong>are</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>pregnancy</strong><br />

90/128 (70) 112/204 (55) 2.0 [1.2, 3.1] 1.8 [1.1, 3.0]<br />

a<br />

adjusted for maternal age and deprivation.<br />

Association of maternity c<strong>are</strong> factors with fetal and neonatal death from 20 <strong>we</strong>eks gestation <strong>in</strong> babies of women with<br />

type 1 and type 2 diabetes<br />

Maternity c<strong>are</strong> factor<br />

Assessment of suboptimal<br />

fetal monitor<strong>in</strong>g (with<br />

antenatal evidence of growth<br />

restricted baby)<br />

Assessment of suboptimal<br />

fetal monitor<strong>in</strong>g (with<br />

antenatal evidence of fetal<br />

size >90th centile)<br />

Cases<br />

n/N (%)<br />

Controls<br />

n/N (%)<br />

Crude OR<br />

[95% CI]<br />

Adjusted OR a<br />

6/14 (43) 1/11 (9) 7.5 [0.6, 95.5] 4.4 [0.4, 49.9]<br />

29/33 (88) 27/73 (37) 15.8 [4.0, 61.5] 18.3 [5.6, 59.6]<br />

No discussion of mode and<br />

tim<strong>in</strong>g of delivery<br />

11/111 (10) 4/202 (2) 5.45 [1.7, 17.9] 5.0 [1.5, 16.5]<br />

No adm<strong>in</strong>istration of antenatal<br />

corticosteroids b 6/14 (43) 12/33 (36) 1.3 [0.4, 4.8] 1.1 [0.3, 4.4]<br />

Assessment of suboptimal<br />

maternity c<strong>are</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 91/132 (69) 95/215 (44) 2.8 [1.8, 4.5] 2.9 [1.8, 4.7]<br />

antenatal period<br />

Assessment of suboptimal<br />

maternity c<strong>are</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g labour<br />

and delivery<br />

51/125 (41) 72/213 (34) 1.4 [0.9, 2.1] 1.3 [0.8, 2.2]<br />

a<br />

Adjusted for maternal age and deprivation.<br />

b<br />

Analysis restricted to babies deliver<strong>in</strong>g from 24+0 to 35+6 <strong>we</strong>eks gestation and exclud<strong>in</strong>g antepartum stillbirths.<br />

128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!