Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Diabetes in pregnancy: are we providing the best care ... - HQIP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Association of diabetes c<strong>are</strong> factors (exclud<strong>in</strong>g glycaemic control) with major fetal congenital anomaly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
offspr<strong>in</strong>g of women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes<br />
<strong>Diabetes</strong> c<strong>are</strong> factor<br />
Cases<br />
n/N (%)<br />
Controls<br />
n/N (%)<br />
Crude OR<br />
[95% CI]<br />
Adjusted OR a<br />
No ret<strong>in</strong>al assessment dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
1st trimester or at book<strong>in</strong>g if later 43/111 (39) 49/183 (27) 1.7 [1.0, 2.9] 1.5 [0.9, 2.6]<br />
No referral to ophthalmologist<br />
(if ret<strong>in</strong>opathy present) 4/29 (14) 21/44 (48) 0.2 [0.1, 0.6] 0.1 [0.0, 0.4]<br />
No monitor<strong>in</strong>g for nephropathy 27/118 (23) 26/206 (13) 2.1 [1.1, 3.8] 2.0 [1.1, 3.7]<br />
No test of renal function<br />
(if nephropathy present) 4/12 (33) 5/14 (36) 0.9 [0.2, 4.7] 0.4 [0.1, 3.2]<br />
Assessment of suboptimal diabetes<br />
c<strong>are</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pregnancy</strong> 74/113 (65) 112/204 (55) 1.6 [1.0, 2.5] 1.4 [0.9, 2.3]<br />
a<br />
Adjusted for maternal age and deprivation.<br />
Association of maternity c<strong>are</strong> factors with major fetal congenital anomaly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> offspr<strong>in</strong>g of women with type 1 and<br />
type 2 diabetes<br />
Maternity c<strong>are</strong> factor<br />
Cases<br />
n/N (%)<br />
Controls<br />
n/N (%)<br />
Crude OR<br />
[95% CI]<br />
Adjusted OR a<br />
Assessment of suboptimal fetal<br />
monitor<strong>in</strong>g (with antenatal evidence<br />
1/13 (8) 1/11 (9) 0.8 [0.0, 16.1] 0.4 [0.0, 8.0]<br />
of growth restricted baby)<br />
Assessment of suboptimal fetal<br />
monitor<strong>in</strong>g (with antenatal evidence<br />
7/20 (35) 27/73 (37) 1.2 [0.4, 3.3] 1.1 [0.3, 3.7]<br />
of fetal size >90th centile)<br />
No discussion of mode and<br />
tim<strong>in</strong>g of delivery 6/102 (6) 4/202 (2) 3.1 [0.9, 11.3] 2.5 [0.6, 9.8]<br />
No adm<strong>in</strong>istration of antenatal<br />
corticosteroids b 12/34 (35) 12/33 (36) 1.0 [0.4, 2.6] 1.0 [0.3, 2.9]<br />
Assessment of suboptimal maternity<br />
c<strong>are</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> antenatal period 57/125 (46) 95/215 (44) 1.1 [0.7, 1.7] 1.1 [0.7, 1.8]<br />
Assessment of suboptimal maternity<br />
c<strong>are</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g labour and delivery 44/111 (40) 72/213 (34) 1.3 [0.8, 2.1] 1.3 [0.8, 2.1]<br />
a<br />
Adjusted for maternal age and deprivation.<br />
b<br />
Analysis restricted to babies deliver<strong>in</strong>g from 24+0 to 35+6 <strong>we</strong>eks gestation and exclud<strong>in</strong>g antepartum stillbirths.<br />
123