25.10.2014 Views

European Property Rights and Wrongs - Diana Wallis MEP

European Property Rights and Wrongs - Diana Wallis MEP

European Property Rights and Wrongs - Diana Wallis MEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

egions. For example in Spain, communities can legislate on this issue depending<br />

on their degree of independence. It is also the case in Belgium because rules can<br />

vary between regions on registration law <strong>and</strong> inheritance law.<br />

Council Regulation number 44/2001, known as Brussels I 44 , is the instrument that<br />

governs the attribution of international competences between Member States of<br />

the <strong>European</strong> Union, <strong>and</strong> the conditions <strong>and</strong> methods of recognition <strong>and</strong> enforcement<br />

of judgements given in Member States as well as relating to deeds to ownership.<br />

In most Member States this convention replaces the 1968 Brussels convention.<br />

Another difficulty relating to this issue relates to the professionals involved, their<br />

competences <strong>and</strong> their powers, because these can vary between Member States.<br />

In Belgium the notary is the main figure who authenticates property contracts,<br />

in France it would be a lawyer <strong>and</strong> other states differ again <strong>and</strong> the roles <strong>and</strong><br />

expectations of professionals can vary considerably.<br />

Now for consumers, the main issue here relates to access to information. This<br />

is the main obstacle, particularly if we add the issue of languages, a point also<br />

noted by ELRA. You can imagine this can be very tough, <strong>and</strong> there is the status<br />

of estate agents <strong>and</strong> the various professionals involved, which can change from<br />

country to country.<br />

I can give two practical examples from my files. The first case relates to an Italian<br />

company which decided to rent a building in Nivelles, the town I come from,<br />

which is near Brussels. They rented it from a Belgian company which owns the<br />

building. Now the Italian company’s business did not go well, so they decided to<br />

leave the Belgian property, <strong>and</strong> they literally ab<strong>and</strong>oned it, leaving the owner with<br />

a pretty heavy bill. The Brussels I Regulation meant that the dispute was taken to<br />

the Nivelles Justice of the Peace, as the building is located in Nivelle. The decision<br />

was reached, <strong>and</strong> the decision needed to be enforced in Italy. Now it has been<br />

my experience that the Belgian legal system can be slow, but sometimes you find<br />

that other systems are even slower. Nevertheless, it took me a year to get the<br />

Court of Appeal of Florence to say that the Belgian decree was valid. All that was<br />

44 Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction <strong>and</strong> the recognition <strong>and</strong> enforcement<br />

of judgments in civil <strong>and</strong> commercial matters.<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!