25.10.2014 Views

European Property Rights and Wrongs - Diana Wallis MEP

European Property Rights and Wrongs - Diana Wallis MEP

European Property Rights and Wrongs - Diana Wallis MEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A lawyer equipped to h<strong>and</strong>le the first aspect may not do well with the second.<br />

In many Spanish ‘l<strong>and</strong> grab’ cases the second aspect predominates <strong>and</strong> some<br />

at least of the buyers were not made aware of the potential infrastructure costs.<br />

Conveyancing is compartmentalised because property transactions <strong>and</strong> probate<br />

can be, <strong>and</strong> invariably are, reserved for notaries recognised nationally. In the<br />

short term this is the single biggest factor militating against the emergence of a<br />

single Europe-wide property law. UK law firms are much more anxious to embrace<br />

change, believing that wider markets means more business not less. The EU treaties<br />

enshrine the monopoly of national notarial professions <strong>and</strong> this precludes the<br />

emergence of a single market in legal probate <strong>and</strong> conveyancing services. The<br />

Spanish experience shows how unsatisfactory this can be. Spanish notaries advised<br />

buyers according to Spanish professional st<strong>and</strong>ards, <strong>and</strong> yet the information<br />

supplied was clearly inadequate to the needs of many foreign buyers. In the long<br />

run, the notarial monopoly is as unsustainable as the monopoly over conveyancing<br />

once enjoyed by high street solicitors in the UK, <strong>and</strong> the ultimate solution is<br />

the <strong>European</strong> conveyancer. This new profession cannot emerge under current EU<br />

law, but the Valencian saga suggests that this matter is urgent.<br />

Towards a wider <strong>European</strong> l<strong>and</strong> law<br />

L<strong>and</strong> law is essentially a matter for each Member State. Three processes seem<br />

to be at work to create a <strong>European</strong> l<strong>and</strong> law. (1) There is a gradual evolution<br />

of a <strong>European</strong> transactional law as a response to the large volume of crossborder<br />

purchases. (2) An increasing convergence of property systems operating<br />

within the same basic traditions, but that this form of soft harmonisation cannot<br />

overcome the basic structural dislocations between the common law, French,<br />

Germanic <strong>and</strong> Nordic systems. A particular driver is the evolution of computerised<br />

registration systems <strong>and</strong> efforts to ensure their mutual compatibility. (3)<br />

Moves towards a common contract law which might include a <strong>European</strong> code<br />

for the passing of property when goods are bought <strong>and</strong> sold. A proposal is circulating<br />

in the shape of the Draft Common Frame of Reference, though it seems<br />

unlikely that there is the political will for its adoption <strong>and</strong> it is extremely unlikely<br />

that the UK would participate in even the mildest reworking of this proposal. .<br />

Any move to harmonise contract law calls for a knock on reform of l<strong>and</strong> law.<br />

L<strong>and</strong> would be excluded but it is by no means easy to draft an adequate exclu-<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!