Download Guidebook as .pdf (29.1 Mb) - Carolina Geological Society
Download Guidebook as .pdf (29.1 Mb) - Carolina Geological Society Download Guidebook as .pdf (29.1 Mb) - Carolina Geological Society
GEOLOGY OF THE WESTERN PART OF THE CAROLINA TERRANE IN NORTHWESTERN SOUTH CAROLINA Table 1. Uranium-Lead Isotopic Dada 45
Allen J. Dennis and Others The unnamed granite is interpreted to cut the central Piedmont suture. Thus, the central Piedmont suture in this area is a pre-Alleghanian feature. The lineation, a magmatic to submagmatic fabric, and possible some penetrative, solidstate deformation are here interpreted to be related to northwest-vergent Alleghanian folding and what Dennis (1995) interprets to be no more than minor ductile motion along the 50 km N-S trending segment of he central Piedmont suture between Spartanburg and Clinton. The central Piedmont suture is interpreted to have controlled the location of the intrusion. Alternatively, the granitoid may be related to augen gneisses of the Inner Piedmont recognized 2 km southwest of this outcrop on Trail Branch. However, the existence of Carboniferous orthogneisses in the eastern part of the Inner Piedmont has not been documented. Finally we note the lack of a xenocrystic zircon component or evidence of inheritance in these isotopic data. The origin of the southern Appalachian Alleghanian granites is a popular topic for speculation (e.g., Sacks and Secor, 1990; Speer and others, 1994). The data from these plutons does not indicate an origin in crustal anatexis or remobilization of Carolina terrane basement. Figure 2. Concordia diagrams for unnamed granitoid (AD- 1823) and Bald Rock granite (AD-HYDER) Alleghanian granite and that the Bald Rock pluton belongs in the western group of Alleghanian granites (York-High Shoals-Churchland; e.g., Horton and others, 1987). A Late Paleozoic tectonothermal event has been identified in the central Piedmont on the basis of 40 Ar/ 39 Ar mineral ages (Dalmeyer and others, 1986; Horton and others, 1987). The relationship between this event and plutonism in the central Piedmont is most clearly displayed in the vicinity of the High Shoals granite (Horton and others, 1987); elsewhere this relation is less clear. Intrusion of the Bald Rock and other Alleghanian plutons may be responsible for the “annealed” country rock fabric described by Dennis and Shervais (1991). It is suggested that the location of the Bald Rock may have been controlled by existing faults, especially given the contrast in grade and/or structural style between the country rock on the east and west sides of the pluton. CONCLUSIONS We have documented two Carboniferous plutons in the western Carolina terrane of northwestern South Carolina. Three size fractions of zircon from an unnamed granitoid that intrudes the central Piedmont suture in the Glenn Springs quadrangle yield an upper intercept at 326±3 Ma. Thus, in the Carolina terrane adjacent to the central Piedmont suture between Spartanburg and Union, three episodes of plutonism are identified. In the Late Precambrian-Early Cambrian (Mean Crossroads complex) ultramafic-intermediate composition intrusive rocks record the rifting of the Carolina arc at which time deep-seated faulting allowed highly magnesian magmas to ascend with little fractionation. In the Devonian the Pacolet granite and Buffalo gabbro intruded as parts of a linear, post-metamorphic array of gabbros and granitoids that is largely restricted to the area just south and east of the central Piedmont suture. In the Carboniferous the Bald Rock and unnamed granite are part of the well known group of granitic plutons that cover the entire age range of the Alleghanian orogeny mapped in the Carolina terrane and are related to that collision. The unnamed granite crosscuts the central Piedmont suture and provides an upper limit on timing of ductile motion on this fault. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Support for U-Pb geochronologic studies was provided by the South Carolina Universities Research and Education Foundation (Task 14) and NSF EAR 91-17915. thanks to John Shervais for his helpful review. 46
- Page 3 and 4: CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY 1995 OF
- Page 5 and 6: Mafic mineral crystallization in So
- Page 7 and 8: Allen J. Dennis and Others Turn rig
- Page 9 and 10: Allen J. Dennis and Others Fig 4. V
- Page 11 and 12: Allen J. Dennis and Others and a nu
- Page 13 and 14: Allen J. Dennis and Others Fig. 8.
- Page 15 and 16: Allen J. Dennis and Others Fig. 10.
- Page 17 and 18: Allen J. Dennis and Others graphic
- Page 19 and 20: Allen J. Dennis and Others group) o
- Page 21 and 22: Allen J. Dennis and Others includes
- Page 23 and 24: Allen J. Dennis and Others grey roc
- Page 25 and 26: Allen J. Dennis and Others lel to t
- Page 27 and 28: CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Guidebo
- Page 29 and 30: GEOLOGIC CONTRASTS ACROSS THE CENTR
- Page 31 and 32: GEOLOGIC CONTRASTS ACROSS THE CENTR
- Page 33 and 34: GEOLOGIC CONTRASTS ACROSS THE CENTR
- Page 35 and 36: CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Guidebo
- Page 37 and 38: GOLD DEPOSITS OF THE WEST SPRINGS A
- Page 39 and 40: GOLD DEPOSITS OF THE WEST SPRINGS A
- Page 41 and 42: GOLD DEPOSITS OF THE WEST SPRINGS A
- Page 43 and 44: GOLD DEPOSITS OF THE WEST SPRINGS A
- Page 45: Allen J. Dennis and Others Figure 1
- Page 49 and 50: CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Guidebo
- Page 51 and 52: GEOLOGY OF THE WESTERN PART OF THE
- Page 53 and 54: GEOLOGY OF THE WESTERN PART OF THE
- Page 55 and 56: GEOLOGY OF THE WESTERN PART OF THE
- Page 57 and 58: Richard D. Warner, Nicholas B. Kidd
- Page 59 and 60: Richard D. Warner, Nicholas B. Kidd
- Page 61 and 62: Richard D. Warner, Nicholas B. Kidd
- Page 63 and 64: Richard D. Warner, Nicholas B. Kidd
- Page 65 and 66: Richard D. Warner, Nicholas B. Kidd
- Page 67 and 68: Richard D. Warner, Nicholas B. Kidd
- Page 69 and 70: CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Guidebo
- Page 71 and 72: PETROGRAPHIC AND GEOCHEMICAL STUDY
- Page 73 and 74: PETROGRAPHIC AND GEOCHEMICAL STUDY
- Page 75 and 76: CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Guidebo
- Page 77 and 78: STRUCTURAL CONTRASTS OF THE CAROLIN
- Page 79 and 80: STRUCTURAL CONTRASTS OF THE CAROLIN
- Page 81 and 82: STRUCTURAL CONTRASTS OF THE CAROLIN
- Page 83 and 84: STRUCTURAL CONTRASTS OF THE CAROLIN
- Page 85 and 86: GILES ALLARD AND JAMES WHITNEY disc
- Page 87 and 88: GILES ALLARD AND JAMES WHITNEY and
- Page 89 and 90: GILES ALLARD AND JAMES WHITNEY W.,
- Page 91 and 92: JEFFREY E. CLIPPARD AND ROBERT B. H
- Page 93 and 94: JEFFREY E. CLIPPARD AND ROBERT B. H
- Page 95 and 96: JEFFREY E. CLIPPARD AND ROBERT B. H
Allen J. Dennis and Others<br />
The unnamed granite is interpreted to cut the central<br />
Piedmont suture. Thus, the central Piedmont suture in this<br />
area is a pre-Alleghanian feature. The lineation, a magmatic<br />
to submagmatic fabric, and possible some penetrative, solidstate<br />
deformation are here interpreted to be related to northwest-vergent<br />
Alleghanian folding and what Dennis (1995)<br />
interprets to be no more than minor ductile motion along the<br />
50 km N-S trending segment of he central Piedmont suture<br />
between Spartanburg and Clinton. The central Piedmont<br />
suture is interpreted to have controlled the location of the<br />
intrusion. Alternatively, the granitoid may be related to<br />
augen gneisses of the Inner Piedmont recognized 2 km<br />
southwest of this outcrop on Trail Branch. However, the<br />
existence of Carboniferous orthogneisses in the e<strong>as</strong>tern part<br />
of the Inner Piedmont h<strong>as</strong> not been documented.<br />
Finally we note the lack of a xenocrystic zircon component<br />
or evidence of inheritance in these isotopic data. The<br />
origin of the southern Appalachian Alleghanian granites is a<br />
popular topic for speculation (e.g., Sacks and Secor, 1990;<br />
Speer and others, 1994). The data from these plutons does<br />
not indicate an origin in crustal anatexis or remobilization of<br />
<strong>Carolina</strong> terrane b<strong>as</strong>ement.<br />
Figure 2. Concordia diagrams for unnamed granitoid (AD-<br />
1823) and Bald Rock granite (AD-HYDER)<br />
Alleghanian granite and that the Bald Rock pluton belongs in<br />
the western group of Alleghanian granites (York-High<br />
Shoals-Churchland; e.g., Horton and others, 1987). A Late<br />
Paleozoic tectonothermal event h<strong>as</strong> been identified in the<br />
central Piedmont on the b<strong>as</strong>is of 40 Ar/ 39 Ar mineral ages<br />
(Dalmeyer and others, 1986; Horton and others, 1987).<br />
The relationship between this event and plutonism in the<br />
central Piedmont is most clearly displayed in the vicinity of<br />
the High Shoals granite (Horton and others, 1987); elsewhere<br />
this relation is less clear. Intrusion of the Bald Rock<br />
and other Alleghanian plutons may be responsible for the<br />
“annealed” country rock fabric described by Dennis and<br />
Shervais (1991). It is suggested that the location of the Bald<br />
Rock may have been controlled by existing faults, especially<br />
given the contr<strong>as</strong>t in grade and/or structural style between<br />
the country rock on the e<strong>as</strong>t and west sides of the pluton.<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
We have documented two Carboniferous plutons in the<br />
western <strong>Carolina</strong> terrane of northwestern South <strong>Carolina</strong>.<br />
Three size fractions of zircon from an unnamed granitoid<br />
that intrudes the central Piedmont suture in the Glenn<br />
Springs quadrangle yield an upper intercept at 326±3 Ma.<br />
Thus, in the <strong>Carolina</strong> terrane adjacent to the central Piedmont<br />
suture between Spartanburg and Union, three episodes<br />
of plutonism are identified. In the Late Precambrian-Early<br />
Cambrian (Mean Crossroads complex) ultramafic-intermediate<br />
composition intrusive rocks record the rifting of the<br />
<strong>Carolina</strong> arc at which time deep-seated faulting allowed<br />
highly magnesian magm<strong>as</strong> to <strong>as</strong>cend with little fractionation.<br />
In the Devonian the Pacolet granite and Buffalo gabbro<br />
intruded <strong>as</strong> parts of a linear, post-metamorphic array of gabbros<br />
and granitoids that is largely restricted to the area just<br />
south and e<strong>as</strong>t of the central Piedmont suture. In the Carboniferous<br />
the Bald Rock and unnamed granite are part of the<br />
well known group of granitic plutons that cover the entire<br />
age range of the Alleghanian orogeny mapped in the <strong>Carolina</strong><br />
terrane and are related to that collision. The unnamed<br />
granite crosscuts the central Piedmont suture and provides an<br />
upper limit on timing of ductile motion on this fault.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
Support for U-Pb geochronologic studies w<strong>as</strong> provided<br />
by the South <strong>Carolina</strong> Universities Research and Education<br />
Foundation (T<strong>as</strong>k 14) and NSF EAR 91-17915. thanks to<br />
John Shervais for his helpful review.<br />
46