24.10.2014 Views

Download Guidebook as .pdf (29.1 Mb) - Carolina Geological Society

Download Guidebook as .pdf (29.1 Mb) - Carolina Geological Society

Download Guidebook as .pdf (29.1 Mb) - Carolina Geological Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY<br />

<strong>Guidebook</strong> for 1995 Annual Meeting<br />

Pages 25-32<br />

GEOLOGIC CONTRASTS ACROSS THE CENTRAL PIEDMONT SUTURE IN NORTH – CENTRAL NORTH<br />

CAROLINA<br />

James K. Wilkins, Glenn S. Shell, and James P. Hibbard<br />

Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences<br />

N.C. State University<br />

Raleigh, NC 27695<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The central Piedmont suture (CPS) marks the boundary<br />

between two distinct tectonostratigraphic packages in the<br />

southern Appalachians, the Piedmont zone and the <strong>Carolina</strong><br />

zone (Figure 1, Hatcher and Zeitz, 1980; for zonation terminology,<br />

see Hibbard and Samson, 1995). This first-order<br />

boundary is recognized along much of its length in Georgia<br />

to South <strong>Carolina</strong> by the transition from high grade schists<br />

and gneisses with gently dipping foliations in the Piedmont<br />

zone (primarily the Inner Piedmont in this region) into lower<br />

grade, late Precambrian-Cambrian metaigneous and<br />

met<strong>as</strong>edimentary rocks with steeply dipping foliations in the<br />

<strong>Carolina</strong> zone (primarily the <strong>Carolina</strong> slate belt and the<br />

Charlotte belt). Accompanying this transition is a change in<br />

the geophysical signature within each belt (Hatcher and<br />

Zietz, 1980). In particular, magnetic signatures in the Piedmont<br />

zone are characterized by low frequency patterns relative<br />

to higher frequency patterns within the <strong>Carolina</strong> zone.<br />

Similar contr<strong>as</strong>ts in lithologies, structural style, and geophysical<br />

signature have recently been recognized across a<br />

shear zone separating high grade gneisses from the <strong>Carolina</strong><br />

zone of north-central North <strong>Carolina</strong>. These findings have<br />

led to a proposal that this boundary represents the northern<br />

extension of the CPS (Hibbard, 1993).<br />

In many are<strong>as</strong> the CPS h<strong>as</strong> been affected by later deformation,<br />

the effects of which vary quite dramatically. For<br />

example, in north-central South <strong>Carolina</strong> the CPS is<br />

deformed into upright, tight folds (Hatcher and others, 1988;<br />

Dennis, 1991). Elsewhere the CPS h<strong>as</strong> been overprinted by<br />

Alleghanian dextral shear zones (Hooper and Hacher, 1989;<br />

Figure 1. Regional map of the four tectonostratigraphic zones of the southern Appalachians, the black box denotes the study area;<br />

K= Kiokee belt, PMB = Pine Mtn. Elt, SMA = Sauratown Mtns. Anticlinorium’s, U = Uchee belt (after Hibbard and Samson, 1995).<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!