GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT - CRC LEME

GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT - CRC LEME GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT - CRC LEME

crcleme.org.au
from crcleme.org.au More from this publisher
23.10.2014 Views

6.2 EC and pH 6.2.1 Methodology Soil electrical conductivities were measured to determine the conductivity, salt content and salt load of the surface materials within 30 cm of the surface. Conductivity also provided a measure of soil development in landform units of different ages. Measuring pH quantitatively provides a cross check on field determinations and another way of determining soil evolution in differently aged landform units. Measuring salinity and pH in soil was carried out using the 1:5 method. With this method, 10ml of distilled water is placed in a measuring container and small soil particles added until the volume of the contents of the container increased by 5ml to bring the volume to 15ml. Additional water is then added to bring the total volume to 30ml. the sample is shaken intermittently for five minutes and allow it to settle for five minutes. EC and pH probes are dipped into the solution and readings taken. 6.2.2 Results The measured EC values ranged between 0.036 and 4.4 dS/m, with the majority (all but seven) falling below 1.0 dS/m. There is no good trend between conductivity and geomorphic unit relatively high conductivities (>1.0) are found in units Fs, Fm1, Fm3, and T. However, the terrace (T) units are on average more saline than those of the floodplain and uplands. Measured pH values range between 4.45 and 9.45, with the majority of the samples being acidic. There is a clear trend between increasing age of geomorphic unit and increasing pH. The youngest geomorphic units are almost entirely acidic, including almost all examples of unit Fm1. Soils from the terrace unit and uplands are near neutral to alkaline ( 17

Table 2). Mean pH and EC profiles are shown in Figure 11 and Figure , respectively. pH was lowest in the Fm1 unit at all depths, and increased with increasing age of floodplain units. This may be due to leaching of base cations as a result of the sandier textures of the Fm1 unit. The Uplands had the highest pH at all depths. EC was highly variable within each geomorphic unit and between geomorphic units (Figure 3). However, the Terrace unit showed the highest EC at all depths. 0 pH 1:5 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Depth (m) 0.1 0.2 Fm1 Fm2 Fm3 T U 0.3 Figure 11. Mean pH profiles from each geomorphic unit. Note: horizontal bars indicate the standard error or the mean. 0 EC 1:5 (dS/m) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Depth (m) 0.1 0.2 0.3 Fm1 Fm2 Fm3 T U Figure 18. Mean EC profiles from each geomorphic unit. Note: horizontal bars indicate the standard error of the mean. 18

Table 2).<br />

Mean pH and EC profiles are shown in Figure 11 and Figure , respectively. pH was lowest in<br />

the Fm1 unit at all depths, and increased with increasing age of floodplain units. This may be<br />

due to leaching of base cations as a result of the sandier textures of the Fm1 unit. The Uplands<br />

had the highest pH at all depths. EC was highly variable within each geomorphic unit and<br />

between geomorphic units (Figure 3). However, the Terrace unit showed the highest EC at all<br />

depths.<br />

0<br />

pH 1:5<br />

3 4 5 6 7 8 9<br />

Depth (m)<br />

0.1<br />

0.2<br />

Fm1<br />

Fm2<br />

Fm3<br />

T<br />

U<br />

0.3<br />

Figure 11. Mean pH profiles from each geomorphic unit. Note: horizontal bars indicate the<br />

standard error or the mean.<br />

0<br />

EC 1:5 (dS/m)<br />

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0<br />

Depth (m)<br />

0.1<br />

0.2<br />

0.3<br />

Fm1<br />

Fm2<br />

Fm3<br />

T<br />

U<br />

Figure 18. Mean EC profiles from each geomorphic unit. Note: horizontal bars indicate the<br />

standard error of the mean.<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!