23.10.2014 Views

GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT - CRC LEME

GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT - CRC LEME

GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT - CRC LEME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 METHODOLOGY<br />

4.1 Basic method and rationale<br />

Mapping was done on transparent overlays at 1:25,000 scale and digitally converted into<br />

electronic maps. The main presentation of the data was at 1:100,000 scale, mapping at<br />

1:25,000 scale ensured that there was sufficient detail.<br />

Landform mapping was carried out primarily by one of us (JC) using the LIDAR DEM where<br />

possible. This was supplemented by lower resolution DEM data when the LIDAR was not<br />

available, and compared against satellite imagery. DG carried out most of the mapping in the<br />

areas with lower resolution. The landforms provided information on the spatial and<br />

chronological relationships between different surface units.<br />

Surface properties were mapped using ASTER by another one of us (VW), who also mapped<br />

vegetation patterns from SPOT images. Gamma ray ternary radiometric images were used by<br />

JC to differentiate surface material types where interpretation was difficult. Surface materials<br />

provide information in the hydrologic properties, in particular recharge and salt load.<br />

The polygons were field checked by JC and V Wong by vehicular traverses along various<br />

tracks. Soil pits were dug and sampled, with field descriptions providing preliminary data on<br />

soil properties (Appendix 6). These were followed by quantitative analyses (Appendix 7).<br />

The maps were entered into the GIS by HA and JL, and the work was scientifically reviewed<br />

by CP and KL.<br />

4.2 Data Availability and Quality<br />

4.2.1 Satellite imagery<br />

The primary satellite images used to compile surface polygons were those from ASTER and<br />

SPOT. LANDSAT images were used for comparison and infill, but were not normally<br />

interpreted as SPOT and ASTER coverage was generally adequate for the project area.<br />

ASTER interpretation is shown in Appendix 1), while SPOT interpretation is shown in<br />

Appendix 2.<br />

Three ASTER scenes (with 15m resolution) covered most of the Lindsay-Wallpolla and Lake<br />

Victoria-Darling Anabranch area. The scenes, the only ones available, were acquired from<br />

ACRES in GA. Two scenes were dated 14 Jan 2001 and one was dated 20 Nov 2000, with the<br />

last scene unfortunately having a large section of cloud cover. The ASTER is displayed as a<br />

composite RGB image using the visible and near infrared radiation (VNIR) bands 3, 2 and 1.<br />

Four pan-sharpened pseudo natural colour SPOT scenes (with 2.5m resolution) dated 09 Jan<br />

2005, 25 Feb 2005, 5 July 2005 and 24 Nov 2004 were also acquired from GA. Bands 3, 2<br />

and 1 were displayed in a composite RGB image. Two Landsat-7 ETM ortho-corrected<br />

images (30m resolution) used in the project were acquired on the 15 Mar 2002 and 4 April<br />

2001.<br />

4.2.2 Digital Elevation Models<br />

DEM coverages are shown in Figure 5. Three coverages were used:<br />

• LIDAR<br />

• Elevation models fro digitised topographic maps<br />

• SRTM data<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!