GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT - CRC LEME
GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT - CRC LEME
GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT - CRC LEME
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4 METHODOLOGY<br />
4.1 Basic method and rationale<br />
Mapping was done on transparent overlays at 1:25,000 scale and digitally converted into<br />
electronic maps. The main presentation of the data was at 1:100,000 scale, mapping at<br />
1:25,000 scale ensured that there was sufficient detail.<br />
Landform mapping was carried out primarily by one of us (JC) using the LIDAR DEM where<br />
possible. This was supplemented by lower resolution DEM data when the LIDAR was not<br />
available, and compared against satellite imagery. DG carried out most of the mapping in the<br />
areas with lower resolution. The landforms provided information on the spatial and<br />
chronological relationships between different surface units.<br />
Surface properties were mapped using ASTER by another one of us (VW), who also mapped<br />
vegetation patterns from SPOT images. Gamma ray ternary radiometric images were used by<br />
JC to differentiate surface material types where interpretation was difficult. Surface materials<br />
provide information in the hydrologic properties, in particular recharge and salt load.<br />
The polygons were field checked by JC and V Wong by vehicular traverses along various<br />
tracks. Soil pits were dug and sampled, with field descriptions providing preliminary data on<br />
soil properties (Appendix 6). These were followed by quantitative analyses (Appendix 7).<br />
The maps were entered into the GIS by HA and JL, and the work was scientifically reviewed<br />
by CP and KL.<br />
4.2 Data Availability and Quality<br />
4.2.1 Satellite imagery<br />
The primary satellite images used to compile surface polygons were those from ASTER and<br />
SPOT. LANDSAT images were used for comparison and infill, but were not normally<br />
interpreted as SPOT and ASTER coverage was generally adequate for the project area.<br />
ASTER interpretation is shown in Appendix 1), while SPOT interpretation is shown in<br />
Appendix 2.<br />
Three ASTER scenes (with 15m resolution) covered most of the Lindsay-Wallpolla and Lake<br />
Victoria-Darling Anabranch area. The scenes, the only ones available, were acquired from<br />
ACRES in GA. Two scenes were dated 14 Jan 2001 and one was dated 20 Nov 2000, with the<br />
last scene unfortunately having a large section of cloud cover. The ASTER is displayed as a<br />
composite RGB image using the visible and near infrared radiation (VNIR) bands 3, 2 and 1.<br />
Four pan-sharpened pseudo natural colour SPOT scenes (with 2.5m resolution) dated 09 Jan<br />
2005, 25 Feb 2005, 5 July 2005 and 24 Nov 2004 were also acquired from GA. Bands 3, 2<br />
and 1 were displayed in a composite RGB image. Two Landsat-7 ETM ortho-corrected<br />
images (30m resolution) used in the project were acquired on the 15 Mar 2002 and 4 April<br />
2001.<br />
4.2.2 Digital Elevation Models<br />
DEM coverages are shown in Figure 5. Three coverages were used:<br />
• LIDAR<br />
• Elevation models fro digitised topographic maps<br />
• SRTM data<br />
5