23.10.2014 Views

Drainage Design Manual, Hydrology - Flood Control District of ...

Drainage Design Manual, Hydrology - Flood Control District of ...

Drainage Design Manual, Hydrology - Flood Control District of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Drainage</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> for Maricopa County<br />

<strong>Hydrology</strong>: Rainfall<br />

2.2 RAINFALL DEPTH<br />

The most commonly used descriptor <strong>of</strong> rainfall is the rainfall depth; however, for modeling purposes,<br />

two other rainfall descriptors must be defined. First, the rainfall duration and frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> rainfall depth for that duration must be assigned. Second, since the rainfall depth<br />

is a descriptor <strong>of</strong> the rainfall occurrence at a point in space, both the spatial and the temporal distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> the rainfall depth must be defined. In this section, the rainfall depth-duration-frequency<br />

statistics for use in Maricopa County are described. Subsequent sections describe the<br />

spatial and temporal distributions that are to be applied for the 6-hour local storm, the 24-hour<br />

general storm, and the temporal distribution for the 100-year, 2-hour storm.<br />

2.2.1 Data Source<br />

The most comprehensive and available source <strong>of</strong> rainfall data analysis for Maricopa County is<br />

the NOAA Atlas 14, Precipitation-Frequency Atlas <strong>of</strong> the United States, Volume 1: Semiarid<br />

Southwest (NOAA Atlas 14) (Arizona, Southeast California, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah) (Bonnin<br />

et al, 2004). The NOAA Atlas 14 is to be used for all drainage design purposes in Maricopa<br />

County. The <strong>District</strong> has elected to use the mean partial duration time series point precipitation<br />

values from NOAA Atlas 14 rather than the values for the upper or lower bound <strong>of</strong> the 90 percent<br />

confidence intervals. For critical projects that can significantly affect public safety, health and<br />

welfare, including floodplain delineation and dam safety studies, the engineer/hydrologist should<br />

check model results against indirect methods as defined in Chapter 8. These analyses should<br />

include performance <strong>of</strong> parameter sensitivity analyses, including the use <strong>of</strong> the upper bound <strong>of</strong><br />

the 90 percent confidence interval point precipitation data, to ensure the model results are reasonable<br />

in comparison with available historic gage data for the watershed or hydrologically similar<br />

watersheds. As a result <strong>of</strong> such analyses, the engineer/hydrologist may elect to use the point<br />

precipitation values from the upper bound <strong>of</strong> the 90 percent confidence interval instead <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mean values, in order to better conform with available appropriate gage data. This application<br />

will be acceptable to the <strong>District</strong>. Use <strong>of</strong> the values for lower bound <strong>of</strong> the 90 percent confidence<br />

interval is not recommended.<br />

The NOAA Atlas 14 data available through the NOAA Atlas 14 web site are not to be used for<br />

studies in Maricopa County. Instead, the NOAA Atlas 14 maps in Appendix A.1, the ESRI ASCII<br />

Grid data files available on the <strong>District</strong>’s web site, or the data supplied with the <strong>District</strong>’s DDMSW<br />

computer program are to be used. This data was taken from NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 1, Version<br />

4.0, dated June 19, 2006. This is the version the <strong>District</strong> has reviewed and accepted for use in<br />

Maricopa County. Subsequent versions published by NOAA shall not be used until the <strong>District</strong><br />

has reviewed the data, formally adopted its use by revising this document, or issued an addendum<br />

to this document, posted the new version on the <strong>District</strong> web site, and updated DDMSW.<br />

2-4 August 15, 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!