Drainage Design Manual, Hydrology - Flood Control District of ...
Drainage Design Manual, Hydrology - Flood Control District of ... Drainage Design Manual, Hydrology - Flood Control District of ...
Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa County Hydrology: Application 9.5.3 Application of Muskingum Routing 1. The Muskingum Routing method can be used where flood peak attenuation is expected. The best application of this method is for larger rivers with relatively flat slopes. 2. The parameters, K and X, are best determined by the analysis of stream gage data, if available. Where such data are available, K and X can be determined by analytic methods as presented in many hydrology textbooks, or the HEC-1 parameter optimization option can be used. Other regional flood studies (by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others) may contain the results of such analyses for larger rivers in the County. 3. The following parameter estimation procedures apply primarily to natural stream channels which convey a significant amount of flow in the overbank areas during design-frequency events: a. NSTPS: The choice of a number of subreaches for a particular stream reach can be checked for computational stability using the following equation from the HEC-1 Manual: 1 -------------------- 21 ( – X) ≤ K × 60 1 ---------------------------------------- NSTPS × NMIN ≤ 2 ----------- ( X) where: (9.2) K = the travel time through the entire reach, in hours, X = Muskingum ‘X’, NMIN = the computational time step, (in hours) and NSTPS = the integer number of subreaches. b. K: K is the travel time of the floodwave peak through the entire reach. Calculation using Manning’s equation is usually an appropriate method for estimating the floodwave velocity, V m , with the following provisions: i. Use an average channel area and wetted perimeter for the reach, assuming bankfull conditions. ii. Choose an ‘n’ value representative of the main channel only. Do not include the overbank roughness in a weighted average. iii. Calculate an average flow velocity for the reach ( V ). 9-64 August 15, 2013
Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa County Hydrology: Application iv. Use the following ratios (Cudworth, 1989) to estimate V m , the velocity of the floodwave: Channel Geometry V m V Wide rectangular 1.67 Wide parabolic 1.44 Triangular 1.33 The value of K is then estimated by dividing the reach length by V m . c. X: For wide, shallow channels with low to moderate slopes and significant overbank flow during the design flood being modeled, choose X = 0.15 to 0.25. For steep to very steep, narrow, deep channels with little overbank flow, choose X = 0.25 to 0.40. 9.5.4 Application of Muskingum-Cunge Routing 1. For constructed channels and some natural channels, this routing option can be used by providing all input on the RD record only. This requires selection of a predetermined channel shape (see the HEC-1 User’s Manual). Complex channel geometry and/or variable channel roughness (channel and overbank) can be modeled with the additional use of RC, RX and RY records. An eight-point cross section is input on the RX and RY records to describe the representative channel geometry. 2. Execution of the HEC-1 program may terminate with a math error message if the inflow to the routing reach is zero (no runoff generated from the upstream watershed). This may occur in situations that have either very low rainfall depth (intensities) or exceptionally high rainfall losses, or zero diversion (most often). 9.6 INDIRECT METHODS 9.6.1 Procedures The following instructions should be followed for verifying peak discharges that are derived by analytic methods (Rational Method or rainfall-runoff modeling). A. Verification with Unit Peak Discharge Curves: 1. For a given watershed of drainage area (A), in square miles, divide the 100-year primary peak discharge estimate by A. August 15, 2013 9-65
- Page 156 and 157: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 158 and 159: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 160 and 161: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 162 and 163: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 164 and 165: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 166 and 167: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 168 and 169: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 170 and 171: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 172 and 173: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 174 and 175: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 176 and 177: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 178 and 179: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 180 and 181: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 182 and 183: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 184 and 185: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 186 and 187: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 188 and 189: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 190 and 191: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 192 and 193: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 194 and 195: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 196 and 197: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 198 and 199: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 200 and 201: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 202 and 203: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 204 and 205: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 208 and 209: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 210 and 211: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 212 and 213: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 214 and 215: Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa
- Page 216 and 217: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 218 and 219: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 220 and 221: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 222 and 223: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 224 and 225: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 226 and 227: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 228 and 229: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 230 and 231: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 232 and 233: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 234 and 235: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 236 and 237: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 238 and 239: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 240 and 241: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 242 and 243: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 244 and 245: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 246 and 247: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 248 and 249: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 250 and 251: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 252 and 253: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
- Page 254 and 255: R09E R10E T02S R07E R01W R04E R06E
<strong>Drainage</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> for Maricopa County<br />
<strong>Hydrology</strong>: Application<br />
iv. Use the following ratios (Cudworth, 1989) to estimate V m , the velocity<br />
<strong>of</strong> the floodwave:<br />
Channel Geometry<br />
V m<br />
V<br />
Wide rectangular 1.67<br />
Wide parabolic 1.44<br />
Triangular 1.33<br />
The value <strong>of</strong> K is then estimated by dividing the reach length by V m .<br />
c. X: For wide, shallow channels with low to moderate slopes and significant<br />
overbank flow during the design flood being modeled, choose X = 0.15 to<br />
0.25. For steep to very steep, narrow, deep channels with little overbank flow,<br />
choose X = 0.25 to 0.40.<br />
9.5.4 Application <strong>of</strong> Muskingum-Cunge Routing<br />
1. For constructed channels and some natural channels, this routing option can be used<br />
by providing all input on the RD record only. This requires selection <strong>of</strong> a predetermined<br />
channel shape (see the HEC-1 User’s <strong>Manual</strong>). Complex channel geometry<br />
and/or variable channel roughness (channel and overbank) can be modeled with the<br />
additional use <strong>of</strong> RC, RX and RY records. An eight-point cross section is input on the<br />
RX and RY records to describe the representative channel geometry.<br />
2. Execution <strong>of</strong> the HEC-1 program may terminate with a math error message if the<br />
inflow to the routing reach is zero (no run<strong>of</strong>f generated from the upstream watershed).<br />
This may occur in situations that have either very low rainfall depth (intensities) or<br />
exceptionally high rainfall losses, or zero diversion (most <strong>of</strong>ten).<br />
9.6 INDIRECT METHODS<br />
9.6.1 Procedures<br />
The following instructions should be followed for verifying peak discharges that are derived by<br />
analytic methods (Rational Method or rainfall-run<strong>of</strong>f modeling).<br />
A. Verification with Unit Peak Discharge Curves:<br />
1. For a given watershed <strong>of</strong> drainage area (A), in square miles, divide the 100-year primary<br />
peak discharge estimate by A.<br />
August 15, 2013 9-65