23.10.2014 Views

Drainage Design Manual, Hydrology - Flood Control District of ...

Drainage Design Manual, Hydrology - Flood Control District of ...

Drainage Design Manual, Hydrology - Flood Control District of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Drainage</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> for Maricopa County<br />

<strong>Hydrology</strong>: Application<br />

9.2.2 Procedures for Volume Calculations<br />

Volume calculations should be done by applying the following equation:<br />

V<br />

P <br />

= C<br />

A<br />

12<br />

<br />

where:<br />

(3.3)<br />

V = calculated volume in, acre-feet.<br />

C = run<strong>of</strong>f coefficient from Table 3.2.<br />

P = rainfall depth, in inches.<br />

A = drainage area, in acres.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> volume calculations for stormwater storage facility design, P equals the 100-year,<br />

2-hour depth, in inches, as discussed in Section 2.2, and is determined from Figure A.56 <strong>of</strong><br />

Appendix A.1.<br />

9.2.3 Procedures for the Multiple Basin Approach<br />

The Rational Method can be used to compute peak discharges at intermediate locations within a<br />

drainage area less than 160 acres in size. A typical application <strong>of</strong> this approach is a local storm<br />

drain system where multiple subbasins are necessary to compute a peak discharge at each proposed<br />

inlet location. Consider the schematic example watershed shown in Figure 9.2. A peak<br />

discharge is needed for all three individual subareas, subareas A and B combined at Concentration<br />

Point 1 and subareas A, B and C combined at Concentration Point 2.<br />

There are two accepted methods for computing peak discharges for multiple basins using the<br />

Rational Method. The first method is the traditional approach that relies upon combining the subbasin<br />

areas into a single watershed, computing a new T c , an arithmetically area-weighted value<br />

<strong>of</strong> C for combined sub-basins, and then computing the peak discharge. This approach is<br />

referred to as the “Combined Watershed Method.” The second method is the “Triangular Hydrograph<br />

Method.” For this method, a triangular hydrograph is created for each sub-basin where the<br />

time-to-peak is assumed equal to T c and the hydrograph time base is equal to 2.67T c , as shown<br />

on Figure 3.2. Referring to Figure 9.2, the ordinates <strong>of</strong> hydrographs A and B at CP 1 are added<br />

to obtain the total flow hydrograph. That hydrograph is then lagged downstream to CP 2 by the<br />

estimated travel time in the roadway, pipe, or channel. The lagged hydrograph is then added to<br />

the sub-basin C hydrograph to obtain the peak discharge at CP 2. The triangular hydrograph<br />

method is incorporated in the DDMSW computer program, but the combined hydrograph method<br />

is not. The combined hydrograph method is intended for use by engineers/hydrologists without<br />

access to a computer and DDMSW. Either method may be used but the engineer/hydrologist<br />

9-10 August 15, 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!